Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 minor 73 references

UNSEEN: Uncertainty-aware Navigation via Sparse Estimation in Unknown Environments

T0 review · 0 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read UNSEEN couples localization, mapping, and planning in one uncertainty-aware loop that uses only a monocular camera to optimize both task progress and future estimation accuracy.

desk verdict UNSEEN couples sparse visual SLAM with uncertainty-aware receding-horizon planning in a monocular setup and shows real-world gains, though the improvements stay modest. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.20755 v1 pith:PXQUM3QM submitted 2026-06-18 cs.RO

Tommaso Faraci , Marco Camurri , Daniele Fontanelli , Luigi Palopoli This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.RO
keywords uncertainty-awarenavigationvisualSLAMperception-awareplanningsparsemappingreceding-horizonoptimizationmonocularcameraunknownenvironmentsrobot
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces a navigation framework that keeps localization, mapping, and motion planning tightly linked instead of treating them as separate modules. It runs a sparse visual estimator at 6 Hz that tracks both robot poses and map points together with their uncertainty. These uncertainty values then drive a receding-horizon planner that selects trajectories balancing goal-directed motion against the need for better future observations. The result is reported as lower pose error, higher estimation quality, and full task completion in real unknown environments where vision-only methods usually fail. A sympathetic reader cares because most current stacks lose performance when perception quality drops, precisely because uncertainty never flows back to influence the planned path.

What carries the argument

Receding-horizon planner that receives uncertainty estimates from a sparse visual SLAM front-end and selects trajectories to maximize a combined cost of task progress and expected future estimation quality.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment in which the coupled planner produces trajectories whose realized localization error exceeds that of a decoupled baseline under identical camera input and environment conditions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

UNSEEN is a unified uncertainty- and perception-aware navigation framework that explicitly couples localization, mapping, and planning using only a front-mounted camera. It estimates sparse maps and robot poses with associated uncertainties at 6 Hz and leverages them to plan trajectories that jointly optimize task progress and estimation accuracy in receding-horizon fashion. Simulations and real-world experiments show UNSEEN-SLAM reduces absolute translational error by 9.8 percent and UNSEEN-Plan improves estimation accuracy by up to 45 percent relative to prior methods while maintaining 100 percent task success.

Load-bearing premise

Uncertainty values computed by the sparse visual estimator can be propagated forward through the planner without extra assumptions on scene texture, lighting, or camera motion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Consistent uncertainty flow across the stack reduces the need for multi-modal sensors or strong environmental priors.
  • Joint optimization of motion and estimation produces paths that actively improve localization while still reaching the goal.
  • The 6 Hz sparse estimation rate supports real-time operation on resource-limited platforms.
  • Reported gains hold across both simulation and extensive real-world trials in unknown spaces.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same coupling structure could be tested with other sparse estimators to check whether the accuracy gains depend on the specific SLAM implementation.
  • Extending the horizon length or cost weights might trade off more aggressively between speed and map quality in long corridors.
  • Because the method avoids strong scene assumptions, it may degrade gracefully when texture vanishes if the uncertainty model remains calibrated.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces UNSEEN, a vision-only navigation framework for unknown environments that tightly couples sparse map and pose estimation (with uncertainties) running at 6 Hz to receding-horizon planning. The planner jointly optimizes task progress and estimation accuracy. Simulations and real-world experiments are reported to show UNSEEN-SLAM reducing absolute translational error by 9.8 %, UNSEEN-Plan improving estimation accuracy by up to 45 %, and 100 % task success rate versus state-of-the-art baselines.

Significance. If the empirical results and uncertainty propagation hold, the work is significant because it offers a lightweight, single-camera alternative to modular or multi-modal pipelines while explicitly propagating uncertainty across the full navigation stack. The reported gains in accuracy and task completion under challenging conditions (motion blur, low texture) would be a practical contribution for resource-constrained platforms.

minor comments (3)
  1. Abstract and results sections report percentage improvements (9.8 %, 45 %) without accompanying error bars, number of trials, or statistical tests; adding these would strengthen the empirical claims.
  2. The 6 Hz rate is stated without reference to the hardware platform or breakdown of timing for estimation versus planning; a table or paragraph with these details would improve reproducibility.
  3. Notation for uncertainty (e.g., covariance representations) should be introduced consistently in the methods section and cross-referenced in the planning formulation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive review, accurate summary of UNSEEN, and recommendation for minor revision. The significance assessment aligns with our goals of a lightweight, uncertainty-propagating vision-only navigation stack. No major comments were provided in the report, so we have no points requiring detailed rebuttal or manuscript changes at this stage. We will address any minor suggestions during revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity

full rationale

The provided abstract and description contain no equations, derivations, or claimed first-principles results. All performance claims (9.8% ATE reduction, 45% estimation improvement, 100% success) are presented as outcomes of simulations and real-world experiments. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the text. The framework is described as coupling modules empirically without reducing to tautological inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities described beyond the high-level framework claim.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of UNSEEN: Uncertainty-aware Navigation via Sparse Estimation in Unknown Environments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PXQUM3QM

@misc{pith2026260620755,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: UNSEEN: Uncertainty-aware Navigation via Sparse Estimation in Unknown Environments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PXQUM3QM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.20755}
}
read the original abstract

Visual navigation in unknown environments remains a core challenge in mobile robotics, especially for resource-constrained platforms. Most existing approaches rely on loosely coupled modular pipelines and strong assumptions on perception quality or environmental structure, often resorting to multi-modal sensor suites that increase system complexity and deployment cost. Vision-only navigation offers a lightweight alternative, but its performance degrades severely under motion blur, low texture, and illumination changes, largely because they neglect the tight coupling between commanded motion and perception. While perception-aware methods partially address this issue, they typically optimize individual modules and fail to propagate uncertainty consistently across the navigation stack. In this paper, we present UNSEEN, a unified uncertainty- and perception-aware navigation framework that explicitly couples localization, mapping, and planning using only a front-mounted camera. UNSEEN estimates sparse maps and robot poses with associated uncertainties at 6Hz, and leverages them to plan trajectories that jointly optimize task progress and estimation accuracy in receding-horizon. Simulations and extensive real-world experiments in unknown environments demonstrate the robustness of the proposed approach, with UNSEEN-SLAM reducing absolute translational error by 9.8% and UNSEEN-Plan improving estimation accuracy by up to 45% compared to state-of-the-art methods, while achieving a 100% task success rate.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20755 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. UNSEEN executing a trajectory in an unknown environment containing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Outline of the UNSEENframework. The method relies solely on camera images to perform SLAM and Planning in receding horizon. The obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Unseen SLAM multithreaded structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Quadtree toy example of occupancy mapping. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: UNSEEN Occupancy mapping and planning logic. (a) Textured objects [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Experimental scenarios [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Experimental platform: a Holybro X500 v2 equipped with an Intel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Resulting path delivered by UNSEEN in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Cube Benchmark scenario. Only the cube has been resolved, the reconstruction of the walls is not possible due to lack of texture. (a) Point cloud map from RGB images. (b) Depth point cloud. environment is assumed to be already known at planning time and no exploration …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison of APACE and UNSEEN-Plan trajectories in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Computation times against map size for the Cube benchmark. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Performance of Visual SLAM in a Hard Narrow Passage experiment. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Sequential snapshots of a flight performed with UNSEEN, from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    PANTHER: Perception-Aware Trajectory Planner in Dynamic Environments,

    J. Tordesillas and J. P. How, “PANTHER: Perception-Aware Trajectory Planner in Dynamic Environments,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 22 662– 22 677, 2022

    2022

  2. [2]

    Semantic-aware Active Perception for UA Vs using Deep Reinforcement Learning,

    L. Bartolomei, L. Teixeira, and M. Chli, “Semantic-aware Active Perception for UA Vs using Deep Reinforcement Learning,” in2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Sep. 2021, pp. 3101–3108

    2021

  3. [3]

    Fuel: Fast uav exploration using incremental frontier structure and hierarchical planning,

    B. Zhou, Y . Zhang, X. Chen, and S. Shen, “Fuel: Fast uav exploration using incremental frontier structure and hierarchical planning,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 779–786, 2021

    2021

  4. [4]

    Puma: Fully decentralized uncertainty-aware multiagent trajectory planner with real-time image segmentation-based frame alignment,

    K. Kondo, C. T. Tewari, M. B. Peterson, A. Thomas, J. Kinnari, A. Tagliabue, and J. P. How, “Puma: Fully decentralized uncertainty-aware multiagent trajectory planner with real-time image segmentation-based frame alignment,” in2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2024, pp. 13 961–13 967

    2024

  5. [6]

    Dynus: Uncertainty-aware trajectory planner in dynamic unknown environments,

    K. Kondo, M. Peterson, N. Rober, J. R. Viso, L. Jia, J. Chen, H. Merton, and J. P. How, “Dynus: Uncertainty-aware trajectory planner in dynamic unknown environments,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16734, 2025. 16 Fig. 13. Sequential snapshots of a flight performed with UNSEEN, from beginning (top) to end (bottom). Ground Truth trajectory, reconstruction and cu...

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [7]

    Localization-aware trajectory planning on se(3) for intravehicular robots,

    C. Specht, T. Faraci, V . Kowalski Martins, and R. Lampariello, “Localization-aware trajectory planning on se(3) for intravehicular robots,” in2025 International Conference on Space Robotics, iSpaRo 2025, 2025

    2025

  7. [8]

    Apace: Agile and perception- aware trajectory generation for quadrotor flights,

    X. Chen, Y . Zhang, B. Zhou, and S. Shen, “Apace: Agile and perception- aware trajectory generation for quadrotor flights,” in2024 IEEE Inter- national Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2024, pp. 17 858–17 864

    2024

  8. [9]

    Learning high-speed flight in the wild,

    A. Loquercio, E. Kaufmann, R. Ranftl, M. M ¨uller, V . Koltun, and D. Scaramuzza, “Learning high-speed flight in the wild,”Science Robotics, vol. 6, no. 59, p. eabg5810, 2021

    2021

Show all 73 references
  1. [10]

    Champion-level drone racing using deep reinforcement learning,

    E. Kaufmann, L. Bauersfeld, A. Loquercio, M. M ¨uller, V . Koltun, and D. Scaramuzza, “Champion-level drone racing using deep reinforcement learning,”Nature, vol. 620, no. 7976, pp. 982–987, Aug. 2023

    2023

  2. [11]

    Monoslam: Real-time single camera slam,

    A. J. Davison, I. D. Reid, N. D. Molton, and O. Stasse, “Monoslam: Real-time single camera slam,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1052–1067, 2007. 0 50 100 t (s) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 APE ( m) Mean RMSE Med. (a) 0 50 100 t (s) 0.0 0...

    2007

  3. [12]

    Iterated extended kalman filter based visual-inertial odometry using direct photometric feedback,

    M. Bloesch, M. Burri, S. Omari, M. Hutter, and R. Siegwart, “Iterated extended kalman filter based visual-inertial odometry using direct photometric feedback,”The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1053–1072, 2017

    2017

  4. [13]

    Openvins: A research platform for visual-inertial estimation,

    P. Geneva, K. Eckenhoff, W. Lee, Y . Yang, and G. Huang, “Openvins: A research platform for visual-inertial estimation,” in2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2020, pp. 4666–4672

    2020

  5. [14]

    A multi-state constraint kalman filter for vision-aided inertial navigation,

    A. I. Mourikis and S. I. Roumeliotis, “A multi-state constraint kalman filter for vision-aided inertial navigation,” inProceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2007, pp. 3565– 3572

    2007

  6. [15]

    Kimera: an open- source library for real-time metric-semantic localization and mapping,

    A. Rosinol, M. Abate, Y . Chang, and L. Carlone, “Kimera: an open- source library for real-time metric-semantic localization and mapping,” in2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2020, pp. 1689–1696

    2020

  7. [16]

    Okvis2: Realtime scalable visual-inertial slam with loop closure,

    S. Leutenegger, “Okvis2: Realtime scalable visual-inertial slam with loop closure,” 2022

    2022

  8. [17]

    A general optimisation-based framework for global pose estimation with multiple sensors,

    T. Qin, S. Cao, J. Pan, and S. Shen, “A general optimisation-based framework for global pose estimation with multiple sensors,”IET Cyber- Systems and Robotics, vol. 7, no. 1, p. e70023, 2025

    2025

  9. [18]

    G2o: A general framework for graph optimization,

    R. K ¨ummerle, G. Grisetti, H. Strasdat, K. Konolige, and W. Burgard, “G2o: A general framework for graph optimization,” in2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2011, pp. 3607– 3613

    2011

  10. [19]

    isam2: Incremental smoothing and mapping with fluid relinearization and incremental variable reordering,

    M. Kaess, H. Johannsson, R. Roberts, V . Ila, J. Leonard, and F. Dellaert, “isam2: Incremental smoothing and mapping with fluid relinearization and incremental variable reordering,” in2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2011, pp. 3281–3288

    2011

  11. [20]

    Factor graphs for robot perception,

    F. Dellaert and M. Kaess, “Factor graphs for robot perception,”Founda- tions and Trends® in Robotics, vol. 6, no. 1-2, pp. 1–139, 2017

    2017

  12. [21]

    Orb-slam: A versatile and accurate monocular slam system,

    R. Mur-Artal, J. M. M. Montiel, and J. D. Tard ´os, “Orb-slam: A versatile and accurate monocular slam system,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1147–1163, 2015

    2015

  13. [22]

    ORB-SLAM2: an open-source SLAM system for monocular, stereo and RGB-D cameras,

    R. Mur-Artal and J. D. Tard ´os, “ORB-SLAM2: an open-source SLAM system for monocular, stereo and RGB-D cameras,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1255–1262, 2017

    2017

  14. [23]

    Orb-slam3: An accurate open-source library for visual, 17 visual–inertial, and multimap slam,

    C. Campos, R. Elvira, J. J. G. Rodr ´ıguez, J. M. M. Montiel, and J. D. Tard ´os, “Orb-slam3: An accurate open-source library for visual, 17 visual–inertial, and multimap slam,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2021

    2021

  15. [24]

    Dtam: Dense tracking and mapping in real-time,

    R. A. Newcombe, S. J. Lovegrove, and A. J. Davison, “Dtam: Dense tracking and mapping in real-time,” in2011 International Conference on Computer Vision, 2011, pp. 2320–2327

    2011

  16. [25]

    Large-scale direct slam with stereo cameras,

    J. Engel, J. St ¨uckler, and D. Cremers, “Large-scale direct slam with stereo cameras,” in2015 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS). IEEE, 2015, pp. 1935–1942

    2015

  17. [26]

    Kinectfusion: Real-time dense surface mapping and tracking,

    R. A. Newcombe, S. Izadi, O. Hilliges, D. Molyneaux, D. Kim, A. J. Davison, P. Kohi, J. Shotton, S. Hodges, and A. Fitzgibbon, “Kinectfusion: Real-time dense surface mapping and tracking,” in2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2011, pp. 127–136

    2011

  18. [27]

    Elasticfusion: Real-time dense slam and light source estimation,

    T. Whelan, R. F. Salas-Moreno, B. Glocker, A. J. Davison, and S. Leutenegger, “Elasticfusion: Real-time dense slam and light source estimation,”The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 35, no. 14, pp. 1697–1716, 2016

    2016

  19. [28]

    Fiesta: Fast incremental euclidean distance fields for online motion planning of aerial robots,

    L. Han, F. Gao, B. Zhou, and S. Shen, “Fiesta: Fast incremental euclidean distance fields for online motion planning of aerial robots,” in2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2019, pp. 4423–4430

    2019

  20. [29]

    Octomap: an efficient probabilistic 3d mapping framework based on octrees,

    A. Hornung, K. M. Wurm, M. Bennewitz, C. Stachniss, and W. Burgard, “Octomap: an efficient probabilistic 3d mapping framework based on octrees,”Autonomous Robots, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 189–206, Apr 2013

    2013

  21. [30]

    Efficient submap-based autonomous mav exploration using visual-inertial slam configurable for lidars or depth cameras,

    S. Papatheodorou, S. Boche, S. B. Laina, and S. Leutenegger, “Efficient submap-based autonomous mav exploration using visual-inertial slam configurable for lidars or depth cameras,” in2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2025, pp. 7284–7290

    2025

  22. [31]

    Droid-slam: Deep visual slam for monocular, stereo, and rgb-d cameras,

    Z. Teed and J. Deng, “Droid-slam: Deep visual slam for monocular, stereo, and rgb-d cameras,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 34, pp. 16 558–16 569, 2021

    2021

  23. [32]

    Mac-vo: Metrics-aware covariance for learning-based stereo visual odometry mac- vo.github.io,

    Y . Qiu, Y . Chen, Z. Zhang, W. Wang, and S. Scherer, “Mac-vo: Metrics-aware covariance for learning-based stereo visual odometry mac- vo.github.io,” in2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2025, pp. 3803–3814

    2025

  24. [33]

    Autonomous navigation in unknown environments with sparse bayesian kernel-based occupancy mapping,

    T. Duong, M. Yip, and N. Atanasov, “Autonomous navigation in unknown environments with sparse bayesian kernel-based occupancy mapping,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 3694–3712, 2022

    2022

  25. [34]

    Online mapping and motion planning under uncertainty for safe navigation in unknown environments,

    `E. Pairet, J. D. Hern ´andez, M. Carreras, Y . Petillot, and M. Lahijanian, “Online mapping and motion planning under uncertainty for safe navigation in unknown environments,”IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 3356–3378, 2022

    2022

  26. [35]

    V oxblox: Incremental 3d euclidean signed distance fields for on-board MA V planning,

    H. Oleynikova, Z. Taylor, M. Fehr, R. Siegwart, and J. I. Nieto, “V oxblox: Incremental 3d euclidean signed distance fields for on-board MA V planning,” in2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, September 24-2...

    2017

  27. [36]

    Efficient octree-based volumetric slam supporting signed-distance and occupancy mapping,

    E. Vespa, N. Nikolov, M. Grimm, L. Nardi, P. H. J. Kelly, and S. Leutenegger, “Efficient octree-based volumetric slam supporting signed-distance and occupancy mapping,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1144–1151, 2018

    2018

  28. [37]

    Ufomap: An efficient probabilistic 3d mapping framework that embraces the unknown,

    D. Duberg and P. Jensfelt, “Ufomap: An efficient probabilistic 3d mapping framework that embraces the unknown,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 6411–6418, 2020

    2020

  29. [38]

    Efficient volumetric mapping of multi-scale environments using wavelet-based compression,

    V . Reijgwart, C. Cadena, R. Siegwart, and L. Ott, “Efficient volumetric mapping of multi-scale environments using wavelet-based compression,” inProceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems, Daegu, Republic of Korea, July 2023

    2023

  30. [39]

    Fast, autonomous flight in gps-denied and cluttered environments,

    K. Mohta, M. Watterson, Y . Mulgaonkar, S. Liu, C. Qu, A. Makineni, K. Saulnier, K. Sun, A. Zhu, J. Delmerico, K. Karydis, N. Atanasov, G. Loianno, D. Scaramuzza, K. Daniilidis, C. J. Taylor, and V . Kumar, “Fast, autonomous flight in gps-denied and cluttered environments,” Jo...

    2018

  31. [40]

    Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning,

    S. Karaman and E. Frazzoli, “Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning,”The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 846–894, 2011

    2011

  32. [41]

    Chomp: Covariant hamiltonian optimization for motion planning,

    M. Zucker, N. Ratliff, A. D. Dragan, M. Pivtoraiko, M. Klingensmith, C. M. Dellin, J. A. Bagnell, and S. S. Srinivasa, “Chomp: Covariant hamiltonian optimization for motion planning,”The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 32, no. 9-10, pp. 1164–1193, 2013

    2013

  33. [42]

    An open-source system for vision-based micro-aerial vehicle mapping, planning, and flight in cluttered environments,

    H. Oleynikova, C. Lanegger, Z. Taylor, M. Pantic, A. Millane, R. Siegwart, and J. Nieto, “An open-source system for vision-based micro-aerial vehicle mapping, planning, and flight in cluttered environments,”Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 642–666, 2020

    2020

  34. [43]

    Navigable space construction from sparse noisy point clouds,

    Z. Chen and L. Liu, “Navigable space construction from sparse noisy point clouds,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 4720–4727, 2021

    2021

  35. [44]

    Receding horizon

    A. Bircher, M. Kamel, K. Alexis, H. Oleynikova, and R. Siegwart, “Receding horizon ”next-best-view” planner for 3d exploration,” in2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2016, pp. 1462–1468

    2016

  36. [45]

    Rapid exploration with multi-rotors: A frontier selection method for high speed flight,

    T. Cieslewski, E. Kaufmann, and D. Scaramuzza, “Rapid exploration with multi-rotors: A frontier selection method for high speed flight,” in2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2017, pp. 2135–2142

    2017

  37. [46]

    Motion primitives-based path planning for fast and agile exploration using aerial robots,

    M. Dharmadhikari, T. Dang, L. Solanka, J. Loje, H. Nguyen, N. Khedekar, and K. Alexis, “Motion primitives-based path planning for fast and agile exploration using aerial robots,” in2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2020, pp. 179–185

    2020

  38. [47]

    Echo: An efficient heuristic view- point determination method on frontier-based autonomous exploration for quadrotors,

    J. Yu, H. Shen, J. Xu, and T. Zhang, “Echo: An efficient heuristic view- point determination method on frontier-based autonomous exploration for quadrotors,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2023

    2023

  39. [48]

    Yoder and S

    L. Yoder and S. Scherer,Autonomous Exploration for Infrastructure Modeling with a Micro Aerial Vehicle. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 427–440

    2016

  40. [49]

    An efficient sampling-based method for online informative path planning in unknown environments,

    L. Schmid, M. Pantic, R. Khanna, L. Ott, R. Siegwart, and J. Nieto, “An efficient sampling-based method for online informative path planning in unknown environments,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1500–1507, 2020

    2020

  41. [50]

    Fast and Compute-Efficient Sampling-Based Local Exploration Planning via Distribution Learning,

    L. Schmid, C. Ni, Y . Zhong, R. Siegwart, and O. Andersson, “Fast and Compute-Efficient Sampling-Based Local Exploration Planning via Distribution Learning,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 7810–7817, Jul. 2022

    2022

  42. [51]

    Exploration with global consistency using real-time re-integration and active loop closure,

    Y . Zhang, B. Zhou, L. Wang, and S. Shen, “Exploration with global consistency using real-time re-integration and active loop closure,” in 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2022, pp. 9682–9688

    2022

  43. [52]

    Learning perception- aware agile flight in cluttered environments,

    Y . Song, K. Shi, R. Penicka, and D. Scaramuzza, “Learning perception- aware agile flight in cluttered environments,” in2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2023, pp. 1989–1995

    2023

  44. [53]

    An Efficient Sampling-Based Method for Online Informative Path Planning in Unknown Environments,

    L. Schmid, M. Pantic, R. Khanna, L. Ott, R. Siegwart, and J. Nieto, “An Efficient Sampling-Based Method for Online Informative Path Planning in Unknown Environments,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1500–1507, Apr. 2020

    2020

  45. [54]

    Ia-tigris: An incremental and adaptive sampling-based planner for online informative path planning,

    B. Moon, N. Suvarna, A. Jong, S. Chatterjee, J. Yuan, M. Cao, and S. Scherer, “Ia-tigris: An incremental and adaptive sampling-based planner for online informative path planning,” 2025

    2025

  46. [55]

    Effective exploration for mavs based on the expected information gain,

    E. Palazzolo and C. Stachniss, “Effective exploration for mavs based on the expected information gain,”Drones, 2018

    2018

  47. [56]

    Uncertainty-aware receding horizon exploration and mapping using aerial robots,

    C. Papachristos, S. Khattak, and K. Alexis, “Uncertainty-aware receding horizon exploration and mapping using aerial robots,” in2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2017

    2017

  48. [57]

    Localization uncertainty-aware autonomous exploration and mapping with aerial robots using receding horizon path-planning,

    C. Papachristos, F. Mascarich, S. Khattak, T. Dang, and K. Alexis, “Localization uncertainty-aware autonomous exploration and mapping with aerial robots using receding horizon path-planning,”Autonomous Robots, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 2131–2161, Dec 2019

    2019

  49. [58]

    Perception-aware receding horizon navigation for mavs,

    Z. Zhang and D. Scaramuzza, “Perception-aware receding horizon navigation for mavs,” in2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2018

    2018

  50. [59]

    Perception-aware Path Planning for UA Vs using Semantic Segmentation,

    L. Bartolomei, L. Teixeira, and M. Chli, “Perception-aware Path Planning for UA Vs using Semantic Segmentation,” in2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Oct. 2020, pp. 5808–5815

    2020

  51. [60]

    Perception-aware trajectory generation for aggressive quadrotor flight using differential flatness,

    V . Murali, I. Spasojevic, W. Guerra, and S. Karaman, “Perception-aware trajectory generation for aggressive quadrotor flight using differential flatness,” in2019 American Control Conference (ACC), 2019, pp. 3936– 3943

    2019

  52. [61]

    Perception-aware time optimal path parameterization for quadrotors,

    I. Spasojevic, V . Murali, and S. Karaman, “Perception-aware time optimal path parameterization for quadrotors,” in2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2020, pp. 3213–3219

    2020

  53. [62]

    Okvis2-x: Open keyframe-based visual-inertial slam configurable with dense depth or lidar, and gnss,

    S. Boche, J. Jung, S. B. Laina, and S. Leutenegger, “Okvis2-x: Open keyframe-based visual-inertial slam configurable with dense depth or lidar, and gnss,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 41, p. 6064–6083, 2025

    2025

  54. [63]

    Falcon: Fast autonomous aerial exploration using coverage path guidance,

    Y . Zhang, X. Chen, C. Feng, B. Zhou, and S. Shen, “Falcon: Fast autonomous aerial exploration using coverage path guidance,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 41, pp. 1365–1385, 2025

    2025

  55. [64]

    High-order regularization dealing with ill- conditioned robot localization problems,

    X. Liu and M. Cao, “High-order regularization dealing with ill- conditioned robot localization problems,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 41, pp. 3539–3555, 2025

    2025

  56. [65]

    On-manifold preintegration for real-time visual-inertial odometry,

    C. Forster, L. Carlone, F. Dellaert, and D. Scaramuzza, “On-manifold preintegration for real-time visual-inertial odometry,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2016. 18

    2016

  57. [66]

    Hartley and A

    R. Hartley and A. Zisserman,Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2004

    2004

  58. [67]

    Herlihy and N

    M. Herlihy and N. Shavit,The Art of Multiprocessor Programming, Revised Reprint, 1st ed. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 2012

    2012

  59. [68]

    The open motion planning library,

    I. A. Sucan, M. Moll, and L. E. Kavraki, “The open motion planning library,”IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 72–82, 2012

    2012

  60. [69]

    Planning dynamically feasible trajectories for quadrotors using safe flight corridors in 3-d complex environments,

    S. Liu, M. Watterson, K. Mohta, K. Sun, S. Bhattacharya, C. J. Taylor, and V . Kumar, “Planning dynamically feasible trajectories for quadrotors using safe flight corridors in 3-d complex environments,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1688–1695, 2017

    2017

  61. [70]

    On the fisher–bingham distribution,

    A. Kume and T. Sei, “On the fisher–bingham distribution,”Statistics and Computing, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 167–172, 2009

    2009

  62. [71]

    Brady,Robot motion: Planning and control

    M. Brady,Robot motion: Planning and control. MIT press, 1982

    1982

  63. [72]

    Reachability-guaranteed optimal control for the interception of dynamic targets under uncertainty,

    T. Faraci and R. Lampariello, “Reachability-guaranteed optimal control for the interception of dynamic targets under uncertainty,” in2025 European Control Conference (ECC), 2025, pp. 2824–2831

    2025

  64. [73]

    Efficient derivative computation for cumulative b-splines on lie groups,

    C. Sommer, V . Usenko, D. Schubert, N. Demmel, and D. Cremers, “Efficient derivative computation for cumulative b-splines on lie groups,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2020, pp. 11 148–11 156

    2020

  65. [74]

    Rossmann,Lie Groups: An Introduction Through Linear Groups

    W. Rossmann,Lie Groups: An Introduction Through Linear Groups. Oxford University Press, 01 2002

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.