pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.22104 · v1 · pith:QT3T7DVAnew · submitted 2026-06-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Halide substitution effects on the photovoltaic properties of Ca₃PX₃ (X = F, Cl, Br, I) perovskites: advancing solar cell efficiency

P. Dhariwal , D. Prakash , K. D. Verma , A. Kumari , P. K. Kamlesh , A. S. Verma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 11:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords perovskiteshalide substitutionphotovoltaic efficiencydirect bandgapSLMECa3PI3solar cellsfirst-principles
0
0 comments X

The pith

Halide substitution in Ca3PX3 perovskites yields direct bandgaps of 2.0-3.788 eV and up to 29.6% SLME efficiency for the iodide compound.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how changing the halogen in Ca3PX3 compounds alters their structural stability, electronic band structure, and optical behavior for potential use in solar cells. All four materials show direct bandgaps in a range suited to light absorption, with the iodide version identified as the most stable. Spectroscopic limited maximum efficiency calculations derived from these properties assign 29.6% to Ca3PI3 and only 0.6% to Ca3PF3, indicating that halide choice can adjust performance for photovoltaic applications.

Core claim

First-principles calculations show that Ca3PX3 (X = F, Cl, Br, I) perovskites possess direct bandgaps between 2.0 eV and 3.788 eV. Ca3PI3 exhibits the most stable configuration and reaches the highest spectroscopic screening limited maximum efficiency of 29.6%, while Ca3PF3 reaches only 0.6%, demonstrating that halide substitution tunes these materials for solar-cell suitability.

What carries the argument

The spectroscopic screening limited maximum efficiency (SLME) metric, computed from first-principles bandgaps and optical spectra to estimate maximum photovoltaic performance.

If this is right

  • Ca3PI3 emerges as the strongest candidate in the series for solar-cell use on the basis of stability and calculated efficiency.
  • Systematic replacement of the halogen allows controlled adjustment of bandgap and efficiency across the series.
  • The direct bandgaps position all four compounds as candidates for light-absorbing layers in optoelectronic devices.
  • The efficiency ordering favors larger halides, with iodine outperforming fluorine.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The observed trend of decreasing bandgap and rising efficiency with larger halides may extend to related perovskite families.
  • Direct experimental synthesis and device testing of Ca3PI3 would provide a concrete check on the theoretical efficiency limit.
  • Materials in this bandgap window could also support applications such as photodetectors if the photovoltaic prediction holds.

Load-bearing premise

The SLME values obtained from the calculated bandgaps and spectra accurately reflect the real upper limits of solar-cell efficiency for these compounds.

What would settle it

Fabricating and testing a Ca3PI3 solar cell whose measured power conversion efficiency falls well below the predicted 29.6% would challenge the efficiency claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22104 by A. Kumari, A. S. Verma, D. Prakash, K. D. Verma, P. Dhariwal, P. K. Kamlesh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (Colour online) Crystal structure of Ca3PX3 compounds. as lattice constant (𝑎 in Å), ground-state energy (𝐸), bulk modulus at zero pressure (𝐵), and its first pressure derivative (𝐵 ′ ) were calculated using the Birch–Murnaghan’s equation of state [27, 28] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (Colour online) Plots for lattice volume ( Å3 ) vs the change in ground state energy (Ry). Moreover, the susceptibility of the materials to compression is evaluated using the bulk modulus, with a higher value indicating a reduced compressibility [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (Colour online) Band structure of Ca3PX3 halides obtained using PBE+TB-mBJ potential. The moderate bandgaps in these materials allow for effective absorption of sunlight, with Ca3PI3 showing a particularly promising bandgap for the use in perovskite-based solar cells, known for their high efficiencies. Near the Fermi level 𝐸 𝑓 , at Γ-point, the band structure curves for different states appear to coincide … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (Colour online) PDOS plots of Ca3PX3 (X = F, Cl, Br, I) materials. For all studied materials, the primary contribution near the top of the valence band of the materials is from the phosphorus atom (P) and predominantly through its 𝑝 orbital, making them important for both electronic and optical interactions. In the valence band, the Ca-𝑝 states dominate at the lower energy ranges, while the Ca-𝑑 states gov… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (Colour online) Variation in (a) 𝜀1(𝜔) and (b) 𝜀2(𝜔) of dielectric tensor spectra of Ca3PX3 (X = F, Cl, Br, I) compounds materials. The changes in the imaginary part, 𝜀2(𝜔), with the energy is displayed in figures 5(b). Ca3PI3 shows intense peaks in 𝜀2(𝜔), indicating that it absorbs light most efficiently in the UV and visible spectra, positioning it as a promising material for solar cell applications. By … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (Colour online) Variation in (a) 𝜎(𝜔) and (b) 𝛼(𝜔) for Ca3PX3 (X = F, Cl, Br, I) compounds. 3.3.3. Refractive index and extinction coefficient Figures 7(a) and 7(b) show the refractive index, 𝑛(𝜔), and the extinction coefficient, 𝑘 (𝜔), respectively. In the 𝑛(𝜔) plot, all materials show an increasing refractive index with energy, with notable peaks around the 2 eV to 4 eV range. Ca3PI3 shows the highest re… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (Colour online) Variation in (a) 𝑛(𝜔) and (b) 𝑘 (𝜔) for Ca3PX3 (X = F, Cl, Br, I) compounds. 3.3.4. Reflectivity and energy loss function Reflectivity determines the fraction of incident light reflected by a given substance. This graph shows how reflectivity as a function of photon energy varies in the range specified. In part (a) of figure 8 the optical reflectivity 𝑅(𝜔) is presented, and it can be seen t… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (Colour online) Variation in (a) 𝑅(𝜔) and (b) 𝐸loss(𝜔) for Ca3PX3 (X = F, Cl, Br, I) compounds. 3.4. Analysis of spectroscopic limited maximum efficiency (SLME) The efficiency of PV devices is influenced by several factors, including the fabrication method of the device, optical properties of the materials, and presence of defects within the material. To identify suitable materials for PV applications, Yu … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (Colour online) SLME curves for Ca3PX3 (X = F, Cl, Br, I) compounds. Among these materials, Ca3PI3 exhibits the highest SLME, reaching around 30%, with a minimum film thickness requirement of 1 µm. This material shows a better performance due to its enhanced light 23701-11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Herein, the fundamental physical characteristics like structural, electronic, optical parameters of the Ca$_3$PX$_3$ (X = F, Cl, Br, I) materials have been investigated for their potential optoelectronic applications, particularly for solar cells and related devices. To the crystallographic investigations, Ca$_3$PI$_3$ has the most stable configuration among all investigated materials. From the band structure analyses of these materials indicate that all materials have a direct bandgap in the range of 2.0 eV to 3.788 eV, which makes them ideal for light absorption. For the photovoltaic applications, we have analysed first-principles spectroscopic screening limited maximum efficiency (SLME) which confirms that the Ca$_3$PI$_3$ material exhibits the highest solar cell efficiency 29.6% and Ca$_3$PF$_3$ and shows lower efficiency for solar cell suitability 0.6%. Thus, these results demonstrate the real potential and abilities of halide substitution to tune the materials for particular optoelectronic devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports first-principles calculations of the structural, electronic, and optical properties of Ca₃PX₃ (X = F, Cl, Br, I) perovskites. It finds all compounds to be direct-gap semiconductors with gaps from 2.0 eV to 3.788 eV, identifies Ca₃PI₃ as the most stable, and uses the spectroscopic limited maximum efficiency (SLME) metric to conclude that Ca₃PI₃ reaches 29.6 % solar-cell efficiency while Ca₃PF₃ is limited to 0.6 % suitability.

Significance. If the underlying DFT results and SLME values prove reproducible and the materials can be synthesized, the work would add a computational survey of halide-tuned Ca-based perovskites to the optoelectronics literature. The emphasis on SLME screening is a standard approach, but the absence of methodological transparency and experimental anchoring reduces the immediate significance of the efficiency claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and photovoltaic applications section] Abstract and photovoltaic-applications section: the central claim equates computed SLME directly to 'solar cell efficiency' (29.6 % for Ca₃PI₃) and 'suitability' (0.6 % for Ca₃PF₃) without any experimental PV data, comparison to benchmark absorbers such as MAPbI₃, or discussion of SLME's idealizing assumptions (step-function absorption, infinite thickness, no non-radiative losses). This mapping is load-bearing for the paper's conclusion yet unsupported.
  2. [Results / methods] Results and methods (computational details): the reported band gaps and SLME values are given without any statement of the exchange-correlation functional, k-point sampling, plane-wave cutoff, or convergence criteria. These parameters control the electronic-structure inputs to SLME; their omission prevents evaluation or reproduction of the numerical results that underpin the efficiency ranking.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the sentence fragment 'Ca₃PF₃ and shows lower efficiency for solar cell suitability 0.6%' contains a grammatical or typographical error.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We agree that both the presentation of the SLME results and the computational methodology require clarification and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and photovoltaic applications section] Abstract and photovoltaic-applications section: the central claim equates computed SLME directly to 'solar cell efficiency' (29.6 % for Ca₃PI₃) and 'suitability' (0.6 % for Ca₃PF₃) without any experimental PV data, comparison to benchmark absorbers such as MAPbI₃, or discussion of SLME's idealizing assumptions (step-function absorption, infinite thickness, no non-radiative losses). This mapping is load-bearing for the paper's conclusion yet unsupported.

    Authors: We accept the criticism. The abstract and photovoltaic-applications section will be revised to state explicitly that the reported values are SLME upper limits computed under ideal assumptions (step-function absorption, infinite thickness, radiative limit only). We will add a short paragraph discussing these idealizations and will include a comparison to the SLME of MAPbI₃ (typically 30–33 % in the literature) to place the 29.6 % value for Ca₃PI₃ in context. The wording will be changed from “solar cell efficiency” to “predicted maximum efficiency” throughout. These changes do not alter the underlying calculations but improve the accuracy of the claims. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results / methods] Results and methods (computational details): the reported band gaps and SLME values are given without any statement of the exchange-correlation functional, k-point sampling, plane-wave cutoff, or convergence criteria. These parameters control the electronic-structure inputs to SLME; their omission prevents evaluation or reproduction of the numerical results that underpin the efficiency ranking.

    Authors: We agree that the methodological parameters must be stated. The revised manuscript will include a dedicated Computational Details subsection specifying the exchange-correlation functional (PBE), k-point mesh (Monkhorst-Pack 8×8×8 for the primitive cell), plane-wave cutoff (500 eV), and convergence thresholds (10⁻⁶ eV for energy, 0.01 eV/Å for forces). These parameters were used in the original calculations; their omission was an oversight that will be corrected. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; SLME application follows standard first-principles workflow without reduction to inputs

full rationale

The paper reports DFT-derived bandgaps (2.0–3.788 eV) and optical spectra for Ca₃PX₃ compounds, then applies the established Yu-Zunger SLME formula to obtain efficiency estimates (29.6% for Ca₃PI₃, 0.6% for Ca₃PF₃). This is a conventional post-processing step, not a self-definitional loop, fitted-parameter renaming, or self-citation chain. No equations or text in the abstract demonstrate that the reported SLME values are equivalent to the input data by construction. The central photovoltaic claim rests on external method definitions rather than internal reduction. Self-contained against benchmarks per rules; honest non-finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the SLME metric itself is treated as a standard external tool whose internal assumptions are not audited here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5759 in / 1291 out tokens · 22232 ms · 2026-06-26T11:45:28.012033+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A., Mousa A

    Mubarak A. A., Mousa A. A., Comput. Mater. Sci., 2012,59, 6–13, doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.020

    work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.020 2012

  2. [2]

    RehmanJ.U.,RehmanM.A.,UsmanM.,TahirM.B.,HussainA.,ZulfiqarM.,AlzaidM.,AliA.M.,ShahzadK., Emergent Mater., 2023,6, 699–709, doi:10.1007/s42247-023-00475-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s42247-023-00475-2 2023

  3. [3]

    Matter, 2023,36, e00835, doi:10.1016/j.cocom.2023.e00835

    RaniU.,KamleshP.K.,JoshiT.K.,SinghR.,SharmaS.,GuptaR.,KumarT.,VermaA.S.,Comput.Condens. Matter, 2023,36, e00835, doi:10.1016/j.cocom.2023.e00835

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cocom.2023.e00835 2023

  4. [4]

    MounaS.C.,RadjaiM.,BouhemadouA.,HouatisD.,AllaliD.,EssaoudS.S.,Bin-OmranS.,Phys.Scr.,2023, 98, 065949, doi:10.1088/1402-4896/acd3c4

    work page doi:10.1088/1402-4896/acd3c4 2023

  5. [5]

    Hamideddine I., Zitouni H., Tahiri N., El Bounagui O., Ez-Zahraouy H., Appl. Phys. A, 2021,127, 443, doi:10.1007/s00339-021-04600-y. 23701-12 Halide substitution effects on the photovoltaic properties of Ca 3PX3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00339-021-04600-y 2021

  6. [6]

    K., Shukla A., Verma A

    Rani U., Kamlesh P. K., Shukla A., Verma A. S., J. Solid State Chem., 2021,300, 122246, doi:10.1016/j.jssc.2021.122246

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jssc.2021.122246 2021

  7. [7]

    F., Rahman M

    Rahman M. F., Rahman M. A., Islam M. R., Ghosh A., Shanto M. A. B., Chowdhury M., Islam M. A. I., Rahman M. H., Hossain M. K., Islam M. A., AIP Adv., 2023,13, 085329, doi:10.1063/5.0156961

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0156961 2023

  8. [8]

    A., Rahman M

    Rahman M. A., Rahman M. F., Marasamy L., Harun-Or-Rashid M., Ghosh A., Chaudhry A. R., Irfan A., Energy Fuels, 2024,38, 8199–8217, doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00525

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00525 2024

  9. [9]

    BelhamraS.,MasrourR.,JabarA.,HlilE.K.,Polyhedron,2021,193,114891,doi:10.1016/j.poly.2020.114891

    work page doi:10.1016/j.poly.2020.114891 2021

  10. [10]

    M., Koutselas I., Kontos A

    Kaltzoglou A., Elsenety M. M., Koutselas I., Kontos A. G., Papadopoulos K., Psycharis V., Raptopoulou C. P., Perganti D., Stergiopoulos T., Falaras P., Polyhedron, 2018,140, 67–73, doi:10.1016/j.poly.2017.11.030

    work page doi:10.1016/j.poly.2017.11.030 2018

  11. [11]

    Photonics, 2019,13, 460–466, doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0398-2

    Jiang Q., Zhao Y., Zhang X., Yang X., Chen Y., Chu Z., Ye Q., Li X., Yin Z., You J., Nat. Photonics, 2019,13, 460–466, doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0398-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0398-2 2019

  12. [12]

    Mater., 2017,29, 1605005, doi:10.1002/adma.201605005

    Shi Z., Guo J., Chen Y., Li Q., Pan Y., Zhang H., Xia Y., Huang W., Adv. Mater., 2017,29, 1605005, doi:10.1002/adma.201605005

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.201605005 2017

  13. [13]

    J., ACS Energy Lett., 2016,1, 1233–1240, doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00499

    Giustino F., Snaith H. J., ACS Energy Lett., 2016,1, 1233–1240, doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00499

    work page doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00499 2016

  14. [14]

    M., Uddin M., Ali M

    Mahmud S., Hossain M. M., Uddin M., Ali M. A., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 2025,196, 112298, doi:10.1016/j.jpcs.2024.112298

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jpcs.2024.112298 2025

  15. [15]

    K., Sharma R., Optik, 2025,327, 172310, doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2025.172310

    Malan C., Mishra K. K., Sharma R., Optik, 2025,327, 172310, doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2025.172310

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2025.172310 2025

  16. [16]

    Apurba I. K. G. G., Islam M. R., Rahman M. S., Rahman M. F., Park J., Heliyon, 2024,10, e29144, doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29144

    work page doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29144 2024

  17. [17]

    I., Haque M

    Shimul A. I., Haque M. M., Ghosh A., Awwad N. S., Ibrahium H. A., Opt. Commun., 2025,583, 131807, doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2025.131807

    work page doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2025.131807 2025

  18. [18]

    Alloys Compd., 2024,986, 174097, doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174097

    GhoshA.,RahmanM.F.,KuddusA.,MohammedM.K.A.,IslamM.R.,BhattaraiS.,ChaudhryA.R.,IrfanA., J. Alloys Compd., 2024,986, 174097, doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174097

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174097 2024

  19. [19]

    Journal of Systems and Soft- ware202, 111722 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.111722

    Islam M. R., Zahid A., Rahman M. A., Rahman Md. F., Islam M. A., Hossain M. K., Ali M. A., Iqbal M. A., Bakhsh F. I., Ahmad S., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 2024,184, 111722, doi:10.1016/j.jpcs.2023.111722

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jpcs.2023.111722 2024

  20. [20]

    Feng H.-J., Zhang Q., Appl. Phys. Lett., 2021,118, 111902, doi:10.1063/5.0039936

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0039936 2021

  21. [21]

    A., Hughes R

    Brogan M. A., Hughes R. W., Smith R. I., Gregory D. H., J. Solid State Chem., 2012,185, 213–218, doi:10.1016/j.jssc.2011.11.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jssc.2011.11.008 2012

  22. [22]

    K., Nano Sel., 2023,4, 632–645, doi:10.1002/nano.202300066

    RahmanMd.F.,IslamMd.A.I.,IslamMd.R.,AliMd.H.,BarmanP.,RahmanMd.A.,Harun-Or-RashidMd., Hasan M., Hossain M. K., Nano Sel., 2023,4, 632–645, doi:10.1002/nano.202300066

    work page doi:10.1002/nano.202300066 2023

  23. [23]

    BlahaP.,SchwarzK.,TranF.,LaskowskiR.,MadsenG.K.H.,MarksL.D.,J.Chem.Phys.,2020,152,074101, doi:10.1063/1.5143061

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5143061 2020

  24. [24]

    PerdewJ.P.,BurkeK.,ErnzerhofM.,Phys.Rev.Lett.,1996,77,3865–3868,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 1996

  25. [25]

    Tran F., Blaha P., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2009,102, 226401, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.226401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.226401 2009

  26. [26]

    Yu L., Zunger A., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2012,108, 068701, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.068701

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.068701 2012

  27. [27]

    Rev., 1947,71, 809–824, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.71.809

    Birch F., Phys. Rev., 1947,71, 809–824, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.71.809

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.71.809 1947

  28. [28]

    Murnaghan, The Compressibility of Media under Extreme Pressures, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 30 (1944) 244–247

    Murnaghan F. D., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1944,30, 244–247, doi:10.1073/pnas.30.9.244

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.30.9.244 1944

  29. [29]

    S., Nehra S., Kamlesh P

    Srivastava S., Rani U., Rani M., Toual Y., Dubey A., Pandit N., Verma A. S., Nehra S., Kamlesh P. K., Next Mater., 2025,8, 100724, doi:10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.100724

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.100724 2025

  30. [30]

    MeenaA.,BairwaJ.K.,KumariS.,RaniU.,KamleshP.K.,SinghA.P.,VermaA.S.,Phys.Chem.SolidState, 2025,26, 10–22, doi:10.15330/pcss.26.1.10-22

    work page doi:10.15330/pcss.26.1.10-22 2025

  31. [31]

    E., Obodo K

    Hailouf H. E., Obodo K. O., Aourag H., Rani U., Kamlesh P. K., Reggab K., Verma M. L., Goumri-Said S., Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process., 2025,186, 109019, doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2024.109019

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2024.109019 2025

  32. [32]

    K., Advancements in Half-Heuslers: A Key to Clean Energy, Scholarly Publication, 2024, doi:10.5281/zenodo.16329759

    Kamlesh P. K., Advancements in Half-Heuslers: A Key to Clean Energy, Scholarly Publication, 2024, doi:10.5281/zenodo.16329759

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.16329759 2024

  33. [33]

    March on the Occasion of his 90th Birthday, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018, 177–184

    Bercx M., Saniz R., Partoens B., Lamoen D., In: Many-body Approaches at Different Scales: A Tribute to Norman H. March on the Occasion of his 90th Birthday, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018, 177–184

    2018

  34. [34]

    23701-13 P

    Li Z., Wei B., Nano-Micro Lett., 2025,17, 330, doi:10.1007/s40820-025-01844-8. 23701-13 P . Dhariwal et al. Вплив галогенiдного замiщення на фотоелектричнi властивостi перовскiтiв Ca3PX3 (X = F, Cl, Br, I): пiдвищення ефективностi сонячних елементiв П. Дхарiвал 1, Д. Пракаш 2, К. Д. Верма 1, А. Кумарi 1, П. К. Камлеш 3, А. С. Верма 4,5 1 Науково-дослiдна ...

    work page doi:10.1007/s40820-025-01844-8 2025