Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 137 references

Fast Radio Burst Cosmology: Hubble Tension and Dark Energy

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Fast radio bursts measure the Hubble constant independently at low redshifts via their dispersion measure to redshift relation and constrain dark energy parameters.

desk verdict This is a review that compiles existing FRB cosmology work on H0 and dark energy but adds no new data or derivations. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.22390 v1 pith:S44MGPX2 submitted 2026-06-21 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.HE

Fayin Wang , Xuandong Jia , Daohong Gao , Zigao Dai This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COastro-ph.HE
keywords fastradioburstsHubbleconstantdarkenergydispersionmeasureintergalacticmediumcosmologicalprobescosmicexpansiontension
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reviews how fast radio bursts function as a cosmological probe by using the integrated electron density along lines of sight to link dispersion measure directly to redshift. This enables independent H0 measurements that compete with existing methods and allows FRBs to trace the equation-of-state parameters of dark energy. The review covers current sample results, discusses limiting uncertainties from electron density models and intergalactic medium structure, and outlines how larger localized samples from future surveys will tighten constraints on late-time cosmic acceleration and baryon content.

What carries the argument

The dispersion measure-redshift relation of FRBs, which integrates free-electron density through the intergalactic medium to provide a direct distance tracer independent of luminosity or angular size.

What would settle it

A catalog of hundreds of localized FRBs that produces an H0 value discrepant at several sigma from both local distance-ladder and CMB-inferred values while the same sample fails to improve dark energy constraints beyond current supernova or BAO bounds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Localized FRBs supply a precise dispersion measure-redshift relation that models the intergalactic medium electron density tightly enough to deliver independent low-redshift H0 values competitive with other probes and to constrain dark energy equation-of-state parameters, while current samples already demonstrate this utility and future surveys will deliver more stringent limits on cosmic acceleration.

Load-bearing premise

Uncertainties in Galactic and host galaxy electron density models and intergalactic medium inhomogeneities can be controlled sufficiently for high-precision cosmological constraints.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Current localized and non-localized FRB samples already yield competitive constraints on H0.
  • FRBs act as effective tracers for the dark energy equation-of-state parameters.
  • Uncertainties in Galactic and host-galaxy electron density models plus IGM inhomogeneities remain the main precision limiters.
  • Rapid growth in high-precision surveys and localized samples will produce stringent limits on late-time acceleration, dark energy evolution, and cosmic baryons.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If FRB-derived H0 values converge on the local ladder result while disagreeing with CMB inferences, the method could help isolate whether the Hubble tension arises from early- or late-universe physics.
  • FRB sightlines could map the spatial distribution of baryons in the IGM on large scales once electron-density models improve.
  • Combining FRB data with supernova or BAO measurements in joint analyses might break degeneracies in dark energy models that single probes cannot resolve.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. This review summarizes the cosmological applications of fast radio bursts (FRBs), emphasizing their use via the dispersion measure (DM)-redshift relation to obtain independent low-redshift H0 measurements and to constrain dark energy equation-of-state parameters. It states that current localized and non-localized FRB samples already yield competitive H0 constraints, positions FRBs as effective tracers for dark energy, identifies key systematics (Galactic/host electron density models and IGM inhomogeneities), and argues that future high-precision surveys will deliver stringent constraints on late-time acceleration and cosmic baryons.

Significance. If the cited literature is represented accurately and comprehensively, the manuscript provides a useful compilation of FRB cosmology results that highlights their complementary strengths relative to SN Ia, BAO, and CMB probes. The explicit identification of dominant systematics in the abstract and throughout is a strength, as is the forward-looking discussion of survey prospects. No new derivations or fits are introduced, so the paper's value lies in synthesis rather than novel claims.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'current FRB samples' providing 'competitive H0 constraints' without quoting specific numerical values or citing the particular analyses (e.g., which localized sample yields what H0 uncertainty); adding one or two representative numbers would improve immediate readability.
  2. [Introduction] Section headings and the overall structure are not visible in the provided excerpt, but the transition from H0 discussion to dark-energy constraints to systematics would benefit from an explicit roadmap paragraph at the end of the introduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. No major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Review paper; no derivations or fits introduced by authors

full rationale

The manuscript is explicitly a review that summarizes external literature on FRB applications to cosmology. Its strongest claims rest on cited prior analyses of localized FRB samples for H0 and dark-energy constraints. No new equations, parameter fits, or modeling assumptions are derived within the paper itself. The abstract and structure flag systematics (Galactic/host DM, IGM inhomogeneity) as external limiting factors without introducing author-defined quantities that are then re-used as predictions. No self-citation chain, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of results occurs. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and exhibits no circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors. The work relies on standard cosmological assumptions and electron density models from prior literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fast Radio Burst Cosmology: Hubble Tension and Dark Energy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S44MGPX2

@misc{pith2026260622390,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fast Radio Burst Cosmology: Hubble Tension and Dark Energy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S44MGPX2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.22390}
}
abstract

Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are luminous, millisecond-duration extragalactic radio transients that have emerged as a powerful, complementary cosmological probe for investigating the late-time cosmic evolution, offering unique advantages over conventional probes such as Type Ia supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations, and cosmic microwave background radiation. This review systematically summarizes the cosmological applications of FRBs, focusing on their critical roles in measuring the Hubble constant ($H_0$) and constraining dark energy properties. Benefiting from the precise dispersion measure (DM) - redshift relation of localized FRBs, the integrated electron density of the intergalactic medium (IGM) along the line of sight can be tightly modeled, enabling independent and low-redshift measurements of the cosmic expansion rate. Current FRB samples consisting of localized and non-localized events provide competitive $H_0$ constraints, offering an independent method to measure $H_0$. FRBs also serve as effective tracers to constrain dark energy equation-of-state parameters. We comprehensively discuss key limiting factors for FRB cosmological precision, including uncertainties in Galactic and host galaxy electron density models, and IGM inhomogeneities. With the rapid growth of high-precision FRB surveys and localized FRB samples, FRBs are promising to provide stringent constraints on late-time cosmic acceleration, dark energy evolution and cosmic baryons.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22390 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The quasi-Gaussian distribution of DMIGM (left panel) and lognormal distribution of DMhost (right panel) from IllustrisTNG simulation. Dashed lines in the left panel are DMIGM distributions derived from IllustrisTNG simulations and solid lines are the fitting results using Equation (5). The red line in the right panel shows the best-fitting result of DMhost for repeating FRBs like FRB 20121102, and the blue shaded r… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The latest DM-z relation with localized FRBs. The red dots show 108 localized FRBs. The blue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The probability density function and cumulative distribution function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Summary of representative works using FRBs to constrain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: H0 measurements from H0LiCOW. The declining trend of H0 value with increasing lens redshift has significance levels of 1.7σ. More details can be seen in Ref. Millon et al. (2020). identified with a confidence level of approximately 2.1σ (Krishnan et al. 2020). Furtherm…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison between the Hubble parameter H(z) in the standard ΛCDM model and that derived from Equation (12). H0 = H0,zi = 70 km s−1 Mpc−1 , Ωk0 = 0, and Ωm0 = 0.3 are assumed. More details can be seen in Ref. Jia et al. (2023). With the availability of additional obser…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Fitting results for H0(z) using equal-width binning across ten redshift intervals. Left panel: H0(z) as a function of redshift. A clear decreasing trend is observed, with a significance of 5.6σ at z > 0.3. Right panel: Normalized probability distributions of H0(z) for …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Predictions of H0(zmax) derived from a sample of 36 H(z) measurements (31 CC + 5 BAO). Here, H0(zmax) denotes the Hubble constant inferred from a dataset truncated at a maximum redshift zmax. The red points represent the predicted values of H0(zmax). The gray and purpl…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The descending trend of the Hubble constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

137 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2025, Physical Review D, 112, 083515 3, 13

    Abdul Karim, M., Aguilar, J., Ahlen, S., et al. 2025, Physical Review D, 112, 083515 3, 13

    2025

  2. [2]

    K., & Beniamini, P

    Acharya, S. K., & Beniamini, P. 2025, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2025, 073 9

    2025

  3. [3]

    G., Aguilar, J., Ahlen, S., et al

    Adame, A. G., Aguilar, J., Ahlen, S., et al. 2025, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2025, 021 3, 13

    2025

  4. [4]

    2023, Science, 380, 599 13

    Anna-Thomas, R., Connor, L., Dai, S., et al. 2023, Science, 380, 599 13

    2023

  5. [5]

    2026, Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, 56, 239601 9

    Bao, W., Yang, L., & JunJie, W. 2026, Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, 56, 239601 9

    2026

  6. [6]

    2021, Universe, 7, 85 4, 10

    Bhandari, S., & Flynn, C. 2021, Universe, 7, 85 4, 10

    2021

  7. [7]

    Y ., et al

    Bhardwaj, M., Michilli, D., Kirichenko, A. Y ., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, L51 7

    2024

  8. [8]

    Bhattacharya, M., Kumar, P., & Linder, E. V . 2021, Phys. Rev. D, 103, 103526 4

    2021

Show all 137 references
  1. [9]

    2025, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 695, L12 7

    Bruni, G., Piro, L., Yang, Y .-P., et al. 2025, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 695, L12 7

    2025

  2. [10]

    2025, MNRAS, 537, L61 11

    Chang, C., Zhang, S., Xiao, D., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 537, L61 11

    2025

  3. [11]

    J., Wharton, R

    Chatterjee, S., Law, C. J., Wharton, R. S., et al. 2017, Nature, 541, 58 3, 7

    2017

  4. [12]

    H., Jia, X

    Chen, J. H., Jia, X. D., Dong, X. F., & Wang, F. Y . 2024, ApJ, 973, L54 14 CHIME Collaboration, Amiri, M., Bandura, K., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 261, 29 3 CHIME/FRB Collaboration, Amiri, M., Andersen, B. C., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 59 3, 10 Ch...

    2024

  5. [13]

    2023, MNRAS, 521, 4024 11

    Connor, L., & Ravi, V . 2023, MNRAS, 521, 4024 11

    2023

  6. [14]

    2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 1226–1239 4, 7, 10

    Connor, L., Ravi, V ., Sharma, K., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 1226–1239 4, 7, 10

    2025

  7. [15]

    M., & Lazio, T

    Cordes, J. M., & Lazio, T. J. W. 2002, arXiv e-prints, astroph/0207156 5

    2002

  8. [16]

    2022, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 8, 011019 19

    Crichton, D., Aich, M., Amara, A., et al. 2022, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 8, 011019 19

    2022

  9. [17]

    2026, Phys

    Dai, X., Yang, Y ., Wang, Y ., et al. 2026, Phys. Rev. D, 113, 063514 15

    2026

  10. [18]

    G., De Simone, B

    Dainotti, M. G., De Simone, B. D., Schiavone, T., et al. 2022, Galaxies, 10, 24 15

    2022

  11. [19]

    G., De Simone, B., Schiavone, T., et al

    Dainotti, M. G., De Simone, B., Schiavone, T., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 912, 150 15

    2021

  12. [20]

    2014, ApJ, 783, L35 5 DES Collaboration, Abbott, T

    Deng, W., & Zhang, B. 2014, ApJ, 783, L35 5 DES Collaboration, Abbott, T. M. C., Acevedo, M., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, L14 14 Di Valentino, E., Said, J. L., Riess, A., Pollo, A., & Poulin, G. 2025, Physics of the Dark Universe, 49, 101965 13, 14 Di Valentino, E., Mena, O., Pan, ...

    2014

  13. [21]

    2017, ApJ, 846, L27 19 22 F

    Fialkov, A., & Loeb, A. 2017, ApJ, 846, L27 19 22 F. Y . Wang, D. H. Gao, X. D. Jia & Z. G. Dai

    2017

  14. [22]

    Fortunato, J. A. S., Bacon, D. J., Hip ´olito-Ricaldi, W. S., & Wands, D. 2025, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2025, 018 10

    2025

  15. [23]

    Fortunato, J. A. S., Kalita, S., & Weltman, A. 2026b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.16869 9

  16. [24]

    2014, ApJ, 788, 189 13, 14

    Gao, H., Li, Z., & Zhang, B. 2014, ApJ, 788, 189 13, 14

    2014

  17. [25]

    2022, MNRAS, 516, 1977 11

    Gao, R., Li, Z., & Gao, H. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 1977 11

    2022

  18. [26]

    Giar`e, W., Najafi, M., Pan, S., Di Valentino, E., & Firouzjaee, J. T. 2024, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2024, 035 13 G´omez-Valent, A., & Amendola, L. 2018, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2018, 051 17

    2024

  19. [27]

    Hackstein, S., Br ¨uggen, M., Vazza, F., & Rodrigues, L. F. S. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 498, 4811 10

    2020

  20. [28]

    2022, MNRAS, 511, 662 4, 7, 9

    Hagstotz, S., Reischke, R., & Lilow, R. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 662 4, 7, 9

    2022

  21. [29]

    2019, Bulletin of the AAS, 51, https://baas.aas.org/pub/2020n7i255 19

    Hallinan, G., Ravi, V ., Weinreb, S., et al. 2019, Bulletin of the AAS, 51, https://baas.aas.org/pub/2020n7i255 19

    2019

  22. [30]

    W., Qiu, H., et al

    Hoffmann, J., James, C. W., Qiu, H., et al. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 528, 1583 10

    2024

  23. [31]

    Horstmann, N., Pietschke, Y ., & Schwarz, D. J. 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 668, A34 15

    2022

  24. [32]

    W., Bunton, J

    Hotan, A. W., Bunton, J. D., Chippendale, A. P., et al. 2021, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 38, e009 3

    2021

  25. [33]

    P., Jia, X

    Hu, J. P., Jia, X. D., Gao, D. H., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 542, 1063 13

    2025

  26. [34]

    P., & Wang, F

    Hu, J. P., & Wang, F. Y . 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 517, 576 18

    2022

  27. [35]

    2023, Universe, 9, 94 9, 13

    Hu, J.-P., & Wang, F.-Y . 2023, Universe, 9, 94 9, 13

    2023

  28. [36]

    P., Wang, F

    Hu, J. P., Wang, F. Y ., & Dai, Z. G. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 507, 730 18

    2021

  29. [37]

    2005, Physical Review D, 71, 023506 15, 16

    Huterer, D., & Cooray, A. 2005, Physical Review D, 71, 023506 15, 16

    2005

  30. [38]

    L., Drout, M

    Ibik, A. L., Drout, M. R., Gaensler, B. M., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 99 7

    2024

  31. [39]

    2004, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 348, 999 5

    Inoue, S. 2004, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 348, 999 5

    2004

  32. [40]

    2003, The Astrophysical Journal, 598, L79 5

    Ioka, K. 2003, The Astrophysical Journal, 598, L79 5

    2003

  33. [41]

    N., & Spitler, L

    Jahns-Schindler, J. N., & Spitler, L. G. 2025, Physical Review D, 112, 103541 9

    2025

  34. [42]

    W., Ghosh, E

    James, C. W., Ghosh, E. M., Prochaska, J. X., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 4862 4, 7, 9

    2022

  35. [43]

    D., Gao, D

    Jia, X. D., Gao, D. H., Chen, J. H., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1003, 179 14

    2026

  36. [44]

    D., Hu, J

    Jia, X. D., Hu, J. P., & Wang, F. Y . 2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 674, A45 15, 17

    2023

  37. [45]

    2025, Phys

    Kalita, S., Bhatporia, S., & Weltman, A. 2025, Phys. Dark Univ., 48, 101926 4, 7

    2025

  38. [46]

    2026, ApJ, 996, 50 10, 19 FRB Cosmology: Hubble tension and dark energy 23

    Kalita, S., Uniyal, A., Bulik, T., & Mizuno, Y . 2026, ApJ, 996, 50 10, 19 FRB Cosmology: Hubble tension and dark energy 23

    2026

  39. [47]

    F., Stappers, B

    Keane, E. F., Stappers, B. W., Kramer, M., & Lyne, A. G. 2012, MNRAS, 425, L71 3

    2012

  40. [48]

    C., & Pen, U.-L

    Keating, L. C., & Pen, U.-L. 2020, MNRAS, 496, L106 5

    2020

  41. [49]

    ´O., Ruchika, Sen, A

    Krishnan, C., Colg ´ain, E. ´O., Ruchika, Sen, A. A., Sheikh-Jabbari, M. M., & Yang, T. 2020, Physical Review D, 102, 103525 15

    2020

  42. [50]

    M., & Yang, T

    Krishnan, C., ´O Colg´ain, E., Sheikh-Jabbari, M. M., & Yang, T. 2021, Physical Review D, 103, 103509 15, 18

    2021

  43. [51]

    Krochek, K., & Kovetz, E. D. 2022, Physical Review D, 105, 103528 11

    2022

  44. [52]

    Kumar, P., & Linder, E. V . 2019, Phys. Rev. D, 100, 083533 12

    2019

  45. [53]

    2020, Phys

    Laha, R. 2020, Phys. Rev. D, 102, 023016 4

    2020

  46. [54]

    J., Sharma, K., Ravi, V ., et al

    Law, C. J., Sharma, K., Ravi, V ., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 967, 29 3

    2024

  47. [55]

    W., et al

    Leung, C., Borrow, J., Masui, K. W., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.19514 7

    2025

  48. [56]

    W., et al

    Li, D., Wang, P., Zhu, W. W., et al. 2021, Nature, 598, 267 4

    2021

  49. [57]

    B., Yang, Y

    Li, Y ., Zhang, S. B., Yang, Y . P., et al. 2026, Science, 391, 280 4

    2026

  50. [58]

    2018, Nature Communications, 9, 3833 11

    Li, Z.-X., Gao, H., Ding, X.-H., Wang, G.-J., & Zhang, B. 2018, Nature Communications, 9, 3833 11

    2018

  51. [59]

    E., & Linder, E

    Liao, K., Shafieloo, A., Keeley, R. E., & Linder, E. V . 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 886, L23 17

    2019

  52. [60]

    E., & Linder, E

    Liao, K., Shafieloo, A., Keeley, R. E., & Linder, E. V . 2020, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 895, L29 17

    2020

  53. [61]

    2023, MNRAS, 520, 1324 4

    Lin, H.-N., Tang, L., & Zou, R. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 1324 4

    2023

  54. [62]

    2023, MNRAS, 520, 6237 4, 7

    Lin, H.-N., & Zou, R. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 6237 4, 7

    2023

  55. [63]

    Linder, E. V . 2003, Phys. Rev. Lett., 90, 091301 13

    2003

  56. [64]

    2025, Phys

    Ling, J.-L., Du, G.-H., Li, T.-N., et al. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 112, 083528 13

    2025

  57. [65]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.03769 10

    Liu, Y ., Wei, J.-J., Wu, P., & Wu, X.-F. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.03769 10

    2026 arXiv

  58. [66]

    2023, ApJ, 946, L49 7, 9

    Liu, Y ., Yu, H., & Wu, P. 2023, ApJ, 946, L49 7, 9

    2023

  59. [67]

    R., Bailes, M., McLaughlin, M

    Lorimer, D. R., Bailes, M., McLaughlin, M. A., Narkevic, D. J., & Crawford, F. 2007, Science, 318, 777 3

    2007

  60. [68]

    J., Men, Y

    Luo, R., Wang, B. J., Men, Y . P., et al. 2020, Nature, 586, 693 4

    2020

  61. [69]

    P., Prochaska, J

    Macquart, J. P., Prochaska, J. X., McQuinn, M., et al. 2020, Nature, 581, 391 4, 5, 7, 9

    2020

  62. [70]

    2025, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 536, 3232 19

    Mazurenko, S., Banik, I., & Kroupa, P. 2025, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 536, 3232 19

    2025

  63. [71]

    2014, ApJ, 780, L33 5

    McQuinn, M. 2014, ApJ, 780, L33 5

    2014

  64. [72]

    2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 639, A101 14, 15 Mu˜noz, J

    Millon, M., Galan, A., Courbin, F., et al. 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 639, A101 14, 15 Mu˜noz, J. B., Kovetz, E. D., Dai, L., & Kamionkowski, M. 2016, Phys. Rev. Lett., 117, 091301 4, 11

    2020

  65. [73]

    Najafi, M., Pan, S., Di Valentino, E., & Firouzjaee, J. T. 2024, Physics of the Dark Universe, 45, 101539 13

    2024

  66. [74]

    2022, Nature, 606, 873 7 ´O Colg ´ain, E., Dainotti, M

    Niu, C.-H., Aggarwal, K., Li, D., et al. 2022, Nature, 606, 873 7 ´O Colg ´ain, E., Dainotti, M. G., Capozziello, S., et al. 2026, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 49, 100428 13 ´O Colg´ain, E. ´O., & Sheikh-Jabbari, M. M. 2025, MNRAS, 542, L24 13 ´O Colg´ain, E., Sheikh-J...

    2022

  67. [75]

    K., & Cordes, J

    Ocker, S. K., & Cordes, J. M. 2026, ApJ, 1002, 3 5 24 F. Y . Wang, D. H. Gao, X. D. Jia & Z. G. Dai

    2026

  68. [76]

    2025, Phys

    Pang, Y .-H., Zhang, X., & Huang, Q.-G. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 111, 123504 13

    2025

  69. [77]

    Park, C.-G., P´erez, J. d. C., & Ratra, B. 2024, Phys. Rev. D, 110, 123533 13

    2024

  70. [78]

    2025, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 34, 2550061 13

    Park, C.-G., & Ratra, B. 2025, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 34, 2550061 13

    2025

  71. [79]

    2022, New Astronomy Reviews, 95, 101659 14

    Perivolaropoulos, L., & Skara, F. 2022, New Astronomy Reviews, 95, 101659 14

    2022

  72. [80]

    Petroff, E., Hessels, J. W. T., & Lorimer, D. R. 2022, A&A Rev., 30, 2 4, 19

    2022

  73. [81]

    L., & Gaensler, B

    Piro, A. L., & Gaensler, B. M. 2018, ApJ, 861, 150 6, 7 Planck Collaboration. 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641, A6 3, 12, 16, 19

    2018

  74. [82]

    X., & Zheng, Y

    Prochaska, J. X., & Zheng, Y . 2019, MNRAS, 485, 648 5

    2019

  75. [83]

    2022, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2022, 040 10

    Qiang, D.-C., Li, S.-L., & Wei, H. 2022, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2022, 040 10

    2022

  76. [84]

    Qiu, X.-W., Zhao, Z.-W., Wang, L.-F., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. 2022, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2022, 006 13

    2022

  77. [85]

    2000, The Astrophysical Journal, 545, 842 8

    Quataert, E., & Gruzinov, A. 2000, The Astrophysical Journal, 545, 842 8

    2000

  78. [86]

    G., Yuan, W., Macri, L

    Riess, A. G., Yuan, W., Macri, L. M., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 934, L7 3, 12, 16, 19

    2022

  79. [87]

    2025, ApJ, 986, 231 14

    Rubin, D., Aldering, G., Betoule, M., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 231 14

    2025

  80. [88]

    E., & Zengin, B

    Salti, M., Ciger, E., Kangal, E. E., & Zengin, B. 2022, Physica Scripta, 97, 085011 17

    2022

  81. [89]

    2022, ApJ, 938, 113 14

    Scolnic, D., Brout, D., Carr, A., et al. 2022, ApJ, 938, 113 14

    2022

  82. [90]

    2021, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 29, 9 14

    Shah, P., Lemos, P., & Lahav, O. 2021, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 29, 9 14

    2021

  83. [91]

    J., Birrer, S., Treu, T., et al

    Shajib, A. J., Birrer, S., Treu, T., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 494, 6072 14

    2020

  84. [92]

    2024, Nature, 635, 61 6, 10

    Sharma, K., Ravi, V ., Connor, L., et al. 2024, Nature, 635, 61 6, 10

    2024

  85. [93]

    G., Scholz, P., Hessels, J

    Spitler, L. G., Scholz, P., Hessels, J. W. T., et al. 2016, Nature, 531, 202 3

    2016

  86. [94]

    2023, Chin

    Tang, L., Lin, H.-N., & Li, X. 2023, Chin. Phys. C, 47, 085105 10

    2023

  87. [95]

    P., Bassa, C

    Tendulkar, S. P., Bassa, C. G., Cordes, J. M., et al. 2017, ApJ, 834, L7 3

    2017

  88. [96]

    2013, Science, 341, 53 3

    Thornton, D., Stappers, B., Bailes, M., et al. 2013, Science, 341, 53 3

    2013

  89. [97]

    2019, in Canadian Long Range Plan for Astronomy and Astrophysics White Papers, V ol

    Vanderlinde, K., Liu, A., Gaensler, B., et al. 2019, in Canadian Long Range Plan for Astronomy and Astrophysics White Papers, V ol. 2020, 28 19

    2019

  90. [98]

    M., Ma, Y .-Z., & Witzemann, A

    Walters, A., Weltman, A., Gaensler, B. M., Ma, Y .-Z., & Witzemann, A. 2018, ApJ, 856, 65 4, 13, 14

    2018

  91. [99]

    2023, ApJ, 944, 50 4

    Wang, B., & Wei, J.-J. 2023, ApJ, 944, 50 4

    2023

  92. [100]

    Y ., Lan, H

    Wang, F. Y ., Lan, H. T., Zhao, Z. Y ., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.07140 6

  93. [101]

    Y ., Zhang, G

    Wang, F. Y ., Zhang, G. Q., Dai, Z. G., & Cheng, K. S. 2022, Nature Communications, 13, 4382 4

    2022

  94. [102]

    2021, Physics Letters B, 820, 136596 4

    Wang, H., Miao, X., & Shao, L. 2021, Physics Letters B, 820, 136596 4

    2021

  95. [103]

    2024, ApJ, 965, 38 4

    Wang, Y .-B., Zhou, X., Kurban, A., & Wang, F.-Y . 2024, ApJ, 965, 38 4

    2024

  96. [104]

    K., & Wang, F

    Wang, Y . K., & Wang, F. Y . 2018, A&A, 614, A50 4, 11

    2018

  97. [105]

    2023, ApJ, 955, 101 4, 9

    Wei, J.-J., & Melia, F. 2023, ApJ, 955, 101 4, 9

    2023

  98. [106]

    C., Suyu, S

    Wong, K. C., Suyu, S. H., Chen, G. C. F., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 498, 1420 14 FRB Cosmology: Hubble tension and dark energy 25

    2020

  99. [107]

    2023, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2023, 052 10

    Wu, P.-J., Shao, Y ., Jin, S.-J., & Zhang, X. 2023, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2023, 052 10

    2023

  100. [108]

    2024, Chin

    Wu, Q., & Wang, F.-Y . 2024, Chin. Phys. Lett., 41, 119801 4, 7, 10

    2024

  101. [109]

    Wu, Q., Yu, H., & Wang, F. Y . 2020, ApJ, 895, 33 4, 9

    2020

  102. [110]

    2022, MNRAS, 515, L1 4, 7, 9, 12

    Wu, Q., Zhang, G.-Q., & Wang, F.-Y . 2022, MNRAS, 515, L1 4, 7, 9, 12

    2022

  103. [111]

    G., & Pen, U.-L

    Wucknitz, O., Spitler, L. G., & Pen, U.-L. 2021, A&A, 645, A44 11

    2021

  104. [112]

    2021, Sci

    Xiao, D., Wang, F., & Dai, Z. 2021, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 64, 249501 4

    2021

  105. [113]

    2026, ApJ, 996, 29 11

    Xiong, S.-W., Xiao, S., Jiang, Z.-H., et al. 2026, ApJ, 996, 29 11

    2026

  106. [114]

    2025, ApJ, 988, 177 4, 9

    Xu, C., Feng, Y ., & Xu, J. 2025, ApJ, 988, 177 4, 9

    2025

  107. [115]

    R., Chen, P., et al

    Xu, H., Niu, J. R., Chen, P., et al. 2022, Nature, 609, 685 4

    2022

  108. [116]

    2025, Chinese Physics C, 49, 115109 14

    Yan, H., Pan, Y ., Wang, J.-X., Xu, W.-X., & Peng, Z.-H. 2025, Chinese Physics C, 49, 115109 14

    2025

  109. [117]

    B., Wu, Q., & Wang, F

    Yang, K. B., Wu, Q., & Wang, F. Y . 2022, ApJ, 940, L29 4, 8

    2022

  110. [118]

    2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 895, 7 7, 8, 12

    Yang, Y .-P., Li, Q.-C., & Zhang, B. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 895, 7 7, 8, 12

    2020

  111. [119]

    2017, ApJ, 847, 22 6

    Yang, Y .-P., & Zhang, B. 2017, ApJ, 847, 22 6

    2017

  112. [120]

    M., Manchester, R

    Yao, J. M., Manchester, R. N., & Wang, N. 2017, ApJ, 835, 29 5

    2017

  113. [121]

    2025, Phys

    Ye, G., Martinelli, M., Hu, B., & Silvestri, A. 2025, Phys. Rev. Lett., 134, 181002 13

    2025

  114. [122]

    2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 856, 3 17

    Yu, H., Ratra, B., & Wang, F.-Y . 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 856, 3 17

    2018

  115. [123]

    2023, Rev

    Zhang, B. 2023, Rev. Mod. Phys., 95, 035005 4, 19

    2023

  116. [124]

    Q., Yu, H., He, J

    Zhang, G. Q., Yu, H., He, J. H., & Wang, F. Y . 2020, ApJ, 900, 170 6, 9

    2020

  117. [125]

    2025, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 68, 280406 10

    Zhang, J.-G., Jiang, Y .-F., Zhao, Z.-W., et al. 2025, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 68, 280406 10

    2025

  118. [126]

    2023, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 66, 120412 14

    Zhang, J.-G., Zhao, Z.-W., Li, Y ., et al. 2023, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 66, 120412 14

    2023

  119. [127]

    C., Zhang, B., Li, Y ., & Lorimer, D

    Zhang, R. C., Zhang, B., Li, Y ., & Lorimer, D. R. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 501, 157 10

    2021

  120. [128]

    J., Yan, K., Li, C

    Zhang, Z. J., Yan, K., Li, C. M., Zhang, G. Q., & Wang, F. Y . 2021, ApJ, 906, 49 4, 6, 9

    2021

  121. [129]

    2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 984, L40 7, 8, 12

    Zhang, Z.-L., & Zhang, B. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 984, L40 7, 8, 12

    2025

  122. [130]

    2020, ApJ, 903, 83 13, 14

    Zhao, Z.-W., Li, Z.-X., Qi, J.-Z., et al. 2020, ApJ, 903, 83 13, 14

    2020

  123. [131]

    Zhao, Z.-W., Wang, L.-F., Zhang, J.-G., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. 2023, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2023, 022 13, 14

    2023

  124. [132]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2212.13433 10

    Zhao, Z.-W., Zhang, J.-G., Li, Y ., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2212.13433 10

    2022

  125. [133]

    Y ., & Wang, F

    Zhao, Z. Y ., & Wang, F. Y . 2021, ApJ, 923, L17 6, 7

    2021

  126. [134]

    Y ., Wang, F

    Zhao, Z. Y ., Wang, F. Y ., & Dai, Z. G. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.23144 7

    2026

  127. [135]

    2014, Phys

    Zhou, B., Li, X., Wang, T., Fan, Y .-Z., & Wei, D.-M. 2014, Phys. Rev. D, 89, 107303 4, 13, 14

    2014

  128. [136]

    2022, ApJ, 928, 124 4

    Zhou, H., Li, Z., Liao, K., et al. 2022, ApJ, 928, 124 4

    2022

  129. [137]

    2026, The Astrophysical Journal, 996, 66 10, 12

    Zhuge, J., Kalomenopoulos, M., & Zhang, B. 2026, The Astrophysical Journal, 996, 66 10, 12

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.