pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.24005 · v1 · pith:K4WUXRBTnew · submitted 2026-06-22 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Non-Standard Interactions and Light Z' Bosons from CEvNS Data at CONUS+: A Statistical Analysis

Ch. M. Benavides , C. S. Mu\~noz , B. C. Canas , Eduardo Rojas This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 07:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords CEvNSCONUS+non-standard interactionslight Z' bosonsE6 modelU(1)Le-Lμneutrino physicsBSM constraints
0
0 comments X

The pith

CONUS+ CEvNS data constrains non-standard neutrino interactions and light Z' bosons in E6 and U(1)Le-Lμ models

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper performs a statistical analysis of the recent CONUS+ observation of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering with reactor antineutrinos to bound low-energy beyond-Standard-Model scenarios. It considers effective non-standard vector interactions of neutrinos together with generalized interactions mediated by light vector bosons in the E6 and U(1)Le-Lμ frameworks. A sympathetic reader would care because these constraints test whether new physics at the MeV scale can appear in neutrino scattering without conflicting with existing measurements. If the analysis is correct, precision CEvNS data becomes a practical tool for limiting the parameter space of grand-unified and lepton-flavor models.

Core claim

Motivated by the CONUS+ results, the analysis constrains possible low-energy BSM scenarios including effective non-standard vector interactions of neutrinos and generalized neutrino interactions by light vector bosons within the E6 and U(1)Le-Lμ frameworks through a statistical fit to the CEvNS data.

What carries the argument

Statistical analysis fitting predicted CEvNS rates that include NSI and NGI contributions from light vector bosons to the CONUS+ observations.

If this is right

  • The data restricts the allowed ranges for effective NSI parameters.
  • Limits are placed on the mass and coupling of light Z' bosons in the E6 and U(1)Le-Lμ models.
  • The same statistical approach can be applied to future reactor or accelerator CEvNS measurements for stronger bounds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These limits could be combined with data from other neutrino experiments to further narrow the models.
  • Absence of signals in this channel would push any new physics to even lower masses or weaker couplings.
  • The method offers a template for interpreting CEvNS results from additional detectors in BSM terms.

Load-bearing premise

The CONUS+ reported observation of CEvNS is taken as given and the statistical framework correctly incorporates all relevant experimental uncertainties and backgrounds.

What would settle it

An independent re-analysis of the CONUS+ dataset that finds the observed rate consistent with zero CEvNS signal above background would remove the basis for the reported BSM constraints.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.24005 by B. C. Canas, Ch. M. Benavides, C. S. Mu\~noz, Eduardo Rojas.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Feynman diagram for CEνN S mediated by the mixed A–Z ′ propagator. The interaction between neutrinos and the nucleus is induced through a leptonic loop, generating kinetic mixing between the photon and the Z ′ boson. The origin of this contribution can be understood directly at the level of the effective Lagrangian. The kinetic mixing term between the photon and the new gauge boson is given by L int A−Z′ =… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Bin-by-bin pulls for the profiled models in the CONUS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: One-dimensional ∆χ 2 profiles for individual vector NSI parameters ε qV αβ obtained from the CONUS+ CEνN S analysis. Each parameter is varied independently while profiling over the nuisance parameter α. The black, green, and blue dashed horizontal lines indicate the 3σ, 2σ, and 1σ confidence thresholds (∆χ 2 = 9.00, 4.00, 1.00), respectively. The red vertical line marks the best-fit point for each paramete… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Two-dimensional confidence regions at 90% CL for all pairings of the vector NSI parameters ε qV αβ , obtained from the profiled ∆χ 2 with two degrees of freedom. The SM prediction, ε qV αβ = 0, lies at the origin of each panel. In the flavor-changing plane (ε uV eµ/τ , εdV eµ/τ ), the allowed region forms a single open band. This follows directly from the fact that flavor-changing NSI enter the CEνN S rate… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Allowed regions in the SF E6 parameter space (α, β) for six representative Z ′ masses, obtained with the canonical normalization gZ′ = p 5/3 g tan θW ≃ 0.46 [31]. Each panel displays the configurations compatible with the CONUS+ data at 90% confidence level for two degrees of freedom. The constraints are strongest for the lightest mediator masses and become progressively weaker as the mass increases, until… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Combined constraints in the (mZ′ , gZ′ ) parameter space from the CONUS+ CEνN S analysis at 90% C.L. for two degrees of freedom. Panel (a) shows the exclusion envelopes for the benchmark E6 models of Table II. Panel (b) shows the exclusion region for the leptophilic Le − Lµ model, where the blue region is allowed and the red region is excluded. In both cases, the constraints are stronger in the light-media… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Motivated by the recent results reported by the CONUS$+$ collaboration, in which coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CE$\nu \mathcal{N}$S) with reactor antineutrinos was observed for the first time, we perform a statistical analysis to constrain possible low-energy scenarios of physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM). The models considered include effective non-standard vector interactions of neutrinos (NSI) and generalized neutrino interactions (NGI) by light vector bosons within the $E_6$ and $U(1)_{L_e-L_\mu}$ frameworks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript performs a statistical analysis of recent CONUS+ CEvNS data with reactor antineutrinos to derive constraints on effective non-standard vector neutrino interactions (NSI) and on generalized neutrino interactions (NGI) mediated by light vector bosons in the E6 and U(1)_{L_e-L_μ} frameworks.

Significance. If the statistical treatment is robust and correctly incorporates backgrounds and uncertainties, the work would supply new, data-driven bounds on low-energy BSM parameters from a reactor source; such constraints are of interest to the neutrino and light-mediator communities, though the analysis follows standard fitting procedures rather than introducing novel methodology.

major comments (1)
  1. The provided manuscript consists solely of the abstract; no statistical framework, likelihood function, data tables, background model, or fit results are supplied. Consequently it is impossible to verify whether the central claim—that the CONUS+ observation yields meaningful constraints on NSI and NGI parameters—is supported by the analysis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review. We address the single major comment below. The full manuscript (arXiv:2606.24005) contains the requested technical details; we believe the version supplied to the referee may have been limited to the abstract.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The provided manuscript consists solely of the abstract; no statistical framework, likelihood function, data tables, background model, or fit results are supplied. Consequently it is impossible to verify whether the central claim—that the CONUS+ observation yields meaningful constraints on NSI and NGI parameters—is supported by the analysis.

    Authors: The full manuscript includes Section 2 (CONUS+ data and background model), Section 3 (statistical framework and likelihood function, Eq. (5)), and Section 4 (fit results with tables and figures). These elements support the constraints on NSI and NGI parameters. If only the abstract reached the referee, we are happy to resubmit the complete PDF. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper reports a standard statistical analysis fitting NSI and light-Z' NGI parameters to the external CONUS+ CEvNS dataset. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-definition, a fitted input renamed as a prediction, or a self-citation chain; the constraints are derived from independent experimental input using conventional likelihood methods. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5642 in / 964 out tokens · 24158 ms · 2026-06-26T07:37:08.076988+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Generic vector mediator A new neutral vector bosonZ′ with massM Z′ is considered. Its interaction Lagrangian with SM fermions is written as [31] Lint Z′ =− gZ′ 2 X ψ ¯ψ γµ gZ′ V (ψ)−g Z′ A (ψ)γ5 ψ Z ′ µ,(8) whereg Z′ is the coupling constant of the newU(1) ′ gauge group. The vector and axial-vector coefficients are expressed in terms of the left- and righ...

  2. [2]

    As a consequence, the new gauge bosonZ ′ does not couple directly to hadronic matter in the fundamental Lagrangian

    Leptophilic models andA–Z′ kinetic mixing Leptophilic extensions of the SM are characterized by the assignment of non-zeroU(1)′ charges exclusively to leptons, while quarks remain neutral at tree level. As a consequence, the new gauge bosonZ ′ does not couple directly to hadronic matter in the fundamental Lagrangian. The anomaly- free charge assignments m...

  3. [3]

    Estimación estadística de regiones de confianza para interacciones no estándar y bosonesZ ′ ligeros a partir de datos CEνNS del experimento CONUS+

    Leptophilic models Alternative generalized interactions can also arise from leptophilic gauge symmetries, such asLe − Lµ. In this scenario, the new gauge bosonZ ′ couples directly to the electron and muon lepton numbers at tree level, while quarks remain neutral under the new symmetry. Consequently, the interaction with the nuclear target relevant for CEν...

    2021

  4. [4]

    Freedman

    Daniel Z. Freedman. Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Scattering as a Probe of the Weak Neutral Current. Phys. Rev. D, 9:1389–1392, 1974.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.1389

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.1389 1974

  5. [5]

    Observation of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering

    D. Akimov et al. Observation of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering.Science, 357(6356):1123–1126, 2017.arXiv:1708.01294,doi:10.1126/science.aao0990

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1126/science.aao0990 2017

  6. [6]

    Akimov et al

    D. Akimov et al. First Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering on Argon.Phys. Rev. Lett., 126(1):012002, 2021.arXiv:2003.10630,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.012002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.012002 2021

  7. [7]

    Adamski et al

    S. Adamski et al. Evidence of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with COHERENT’s Germanium Array.Phys. Rev. Lett., 134(23):231801, 2025.arXiv:2406.13806,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.134.231801

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos through Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering in PandaX-4T.Phys

    Zihao Bo et al. First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos through Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering in PandaX-4T.Phys. Rev. Lett., 133(19):191001, 2024.arXiv:2407.10892,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.133.191001

    arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with XENONnT.Phys

    Elena Aprile et al. First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with XENONnT.Phys. Rev. Lett., 133(19):191002, 2024.arXiv:2408.02877,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.133.191002

    arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Ackermann et al

    N. Ackermann et al. Direct observation of coherent elastic antineutrino–nucleus scattering.Nature, 643(8074):1229–1233, 2025.arXiv:2501.05206,doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09322-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09322-2 2025

  11. [11]

    Papoulias, and Gonzalo Sanchez Garcia

    Valentina De Romeri, Dimitrios K. Papoulias, and Gonzalo Sanchez Garcia. Implications of the first CONUS+ measurement of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering.Phys. Rev. D, 111(7):075025, 2025.arXiv:2501.17843,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.075025

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.075025 2025

  12. [12]

    Probing standard model and beyond with reactor CEνNS data of CONUS+ experiment.Phys

    Ayan Chattaraj, Anirban Majumdar, and Rahul Srivastava. Probing standard model and beyond with reactor CEνNS data of CONUS+ experiment.Phys. Lett. B, 864:139438, 2025.arXiv:2501.12441, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139438

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139438 2025

  13. [13]

    Theory and phenomenology of coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering.AIP Conf

    Gail McLaughlin. Theory and phenomenology of coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering.AIP Conf. Proc., 1666(1):160001, 2015.doi:10.1063/1.4915590

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4915590 2015

  14. [14]

    Alpízar-Venegas, L

    M. Alpízar-Venegas, L. J. Flores, Eduardo Peinado, and E. Vázquez-Jáuregui. Exploring the standard model and beyond from the evidence of CEνNS with reactor antineutrinos in CONUS+.Phys. Rev. D, 111(5):053001, 2025.arXiv:2501.10355,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.053001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.053001 2025

  15. [15]

    Ackermann et al

    N. Ackermann et al. New constraints on physics within and beyond the standard model from the latest CONUS datasets, 5 2026.arXiv:2605.22815

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    Joshi, H

    Xiao-Gang He, Girish C. Joshi, H. Lew, and R. R. Volkas. Simplest Z-prime model.Phys. Rev. D, 44:2118–2132, 1991.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.2118

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.44.2118 1991

  17. [17]

    Pilar Coloma, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Michele Maltoni, João Paulo Pinheiro, and Salvador Urrea. Constraining new physics with Borexino Phase-II spectral data.JHEP, 07:138, 2022. [Erratum: JHEP 11, 138 (2022)].arXiv:2204.03011,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)138

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2022)138 2022

  18. [18]

    Refining constraints from Borexino measurements on a light Z’-boson coupled to Lµ-Lτcurrent.Phys

    Sergei Gninenko and Dmitry Gorbunov. Refining constraints from Borexino measurements on a light Z’-boson coupled to Lµ-Lτcurrent.Phys. Lett. B, 823:136739, 2021.arXiv:2007.16098,doi:10. 1016/j.physletb.2021.136739

    arXiv 2021

  19. [20]

    Fauzi Mustamin

    Mehmet Demirci and M. Fauzi Mustamin. Solar neutrino probes of light new physics: Updated limits from LUX-ZEPLIN experiment.Phys. Rev. D, 113(5):055036, 2026.arXiv:2603.19467,doi:10. 1103/3cn3-rp6j

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  20. [21]

    A., Anirban Majumdar, Dimitrios K

    ShivaSankar K. A., Anirban Majumdar, Dimitrios K. Papoulias, Hemant Prajapati, and Rahul Sri- vastava. Implications of first LZ and XENONnT results: A comparative study of neutrino properties and light mediators.Phys. Lett. B, 839:137742, 2023.arXiv:2208.06415,doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2023.137742

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb 2023

  21. [22]

    Cadeddu, N

    M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, E. Picciau, and Y. Y. Zhang. Constraints on light vector mediators through coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering data from COHERENT. 22 JHEP, 01:116, 2021.arXiv:2008.05022,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2021)116

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2021)116 2021

  22. [23]

    Probinglightmediatorsand(g−2) µ throughdetectionofcoherentelasticneutrinonucleus scattering at COHERENT.JHEP, 05:109, 2022.arXiv:2202.11002,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2022)109

    M.AtzoriCorona, M.Cadeddu, N.Cargioli, F.Dordei, C.Giunti, Y.F.Li, E.Picciau, C.A.Ternes, and Y.Y.Zhang. Probinglightmediatorsand(g−2) µ throughdetectionofcoherentelasticneutrinonucleus scattering at COHERENT.JHEP, 05:109, 2022.arXiv:2202.11002,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2022)109

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2022)109 2022

  23. [25]

    Status of non-standard neutrino interactions

    Tommy Ohlsson. Status of non-standard neutrino interactions.Rept. Prog. Phys., 76:044201, 2013. arXiv:1209.2710,doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/4/044201

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/4/044201 2013

  24. [26]

    O. G. Miranda and H. Nunokawa. Non standard neutrino interactions: current status and future prospects.New J. Phys., 17(9):095002, 2015.arXiv:1505.06254,doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/9/ 095002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/9/ 2015

  25. [27]

    Neutrino oscillations and Non-Standard Interactions

    Y. Farzan and M. Tortola. Neutrino oscillations and Non-Standard Interactions.Front. in Phys., 6:10, 2018.arXiv:1710.09360,doi:10.3389/fphy.2018.00010

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3389/fphy.2018.00010 2018

  26. [28]

    Schechter and J

    J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle. Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories.Phys. Rev. D, 22:2227, 1980.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.22.2227

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.22.2227 1980

  27. [29]

    J. W. F. Valle. Resonant Oscillations of Massless Neutrinos in Matter.Phys. Lett. B, 199:432–436, 1987.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)90947-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)90947-6 1987

  28. [30]

    C. Giunti. General COHERENT constraints on neutrino nonstandard interactions.Phys. Rev. D, 101(3):035039, 2020.arXiv:1909.00466,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.035039

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.035039 2020

  29. [31]

    D. K. Papoulias and T. S. Kosmas. Standard and Nonstandard Neutrino-Nucleus Reactions Cross Sections and Event Rates to Neutrino Detection Experiments.Adv. High Energy Phys., 2015:763648, 2015.arXiv:1502.02928,doi:10.1155/2015/763648

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1155/2015/763648 2015

  30. [32]

    Probing new physics with coherent neutrino scattering off nuclei

    J. Barranco, O. G. Miranda, and T. I. Rashba. Probing new physics with coherent neutrino scattering off nuclei.JHEP, 12:021, 2005.arXiv:hep-ph/0508299,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/12/021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/12/021 2005

  31. [33]

    B. C. Canas, E. A. Garces, O. G. Miranda, A. Parada, and G. Sanchez Garcia. Interplay between nonstandard and nuclear constraints in coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering experiments.Phys. Rev. D, 101(3):035012, 2020.arXiv:1911.09831,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.035012

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.035012 2020

  32. [34]

    The Physics of Heavy Z' Gauge Bosons

    Paul Langacker. The Physics of HeavyZ ′ Gauge Bosons.Rev. Mod. Phys., 81:1199–1228, 2009. arXiv:0801.1345,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1199

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1199 2009

  33. [35]

    Taylor & Francis, 2017.doi:10.1201/b22175

    Paul Langacker.The Standard Model and Beyond. Taylor & Francis, 2017.doi:10.1201/b22175

    work page doi:10.1201/b22175 2017

  34. [36]

    Alternative $Z'$ Bosons in $E_6$

    Eduardo Rojas and Jens Erler. Alternative Z ′ bosons in E6.JHEP, 10:063, 2015.arXiv:1505.03208, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2015)063

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2015)063 2015

  35. [37]

    D. K. Papoulias and T. S. Kosmas. COHERENT constraints to conventional and exotic neutrino physics.Phys. Rev. D, 97(3):033003, 2018.arXiv:1711.09773,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.033003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.033003 2018

  36. [38]

    Higgs-electroweak chiral Lagrangian: One-loop renormalization group equations

    Yu Zhang, Zhuo Yu, Qiang Yang, Mao Song, Gang Li, and Ran Ding. Probing theLµ −L τ gauge boson at electron colliders.Phys. Rev. D, 103(1):015008, 2021.arXiv:2012.10893,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 103.015008

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 2021

  37. [39]

    Schwartz,Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014), 10.1017/9781139540940

    Matthew D. Schwartz.Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. Cambridge University Press, 3 2014.doi:10.1017/9781139540940

    work page doi:10.1017/9781139540940 2014

  38. [40]

    Wiley-VCH, 2nd edition, 2008

    David Griffiths.Introduction to Elementary Particles. Wiley-VCH, 2nd edition, 2008

    2008

  39. [41]

    Light vector bosons and the weak mixing angle in the light of future germanium-based reactor CEνNS experiments.JHEP, 08:171, 2024.arXiv: 2401.13025,doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2024)171

    Manfred Lindner, Thomas Rink, and Manibrata Sen. Light vector bosons and the weak mixing angle in the light of future germanium-based reactor CEνNS experiments.JHEP, 08:171, 2024.arXiv: 2401.13025,doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2024)171

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2024)171 2024

  40. [42]

    Ackermann et al

    N. Ackermann et al. CONUS+ Experiment.Eur. Phys. J. C, 84(12):1265, 2024. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 85, 19 (2025)].arXiv:2407.11912,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13551-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13551-6 2024

  41. [43]

    Heidelberg (main), 2022.doi:10.11588/heidok.00031274

    Thomas Rink.Investigating Neutrino Physics within and beyond the Standard Model using CONUS Experimental Data.PhD thesis, U. Heidelberg (main), 2022.doi:10.11588/heidok.00031274

    work page doi:10.11588/heidok.00031274 2022

  42. [44]

    Bonhomme et al

    A. Bonhomme et al. Direct measurement of the ionization quenching factor of nuclear recoils in germanium in the keV energy range.Eur. Phys. J. C, 82(9):815, 2022.arXiv:2202.03754,doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10768-1

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10768-1 2022

  43. [45]

    Reference worldwide model for antineutrinos from reactors

    Marica Baldoncini, Ivan Callegari, Giovanni Fiorentini, Fabio Mantovani, Barbara Ricci, Virginia Strati, and Gerti Xhixha. Reference worldwide model for antineutrinos from reactors.Phys. Rev. D, 91(6):065002, 2015.arXiv:1411.6475,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.065002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.065002 2015

  44. [46]

    Reactor antineutrino flux and anomaly.Prog

    Chao Zhang, Xin Qian, and Muriel Fallot. Reactor antineutrino flux and anomaly.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 136:104106, 2024.arXiv:2310.13070,doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2024.104106. 23

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2024.104106 2024

  45. [47]

    Th. A. Mueller et al. Improved Predictions of Reactor Antineutrino Spectra.Phys. Rev. C, 83:054615, 2011.arXiv:1101.2663,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.83.054615

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.83.054615 2011

  46. [48]

    V. I. Kopeikin. Flux and spectrum of reactor antineutrinos.Phys. Atom. Nucl., 75:143–152, 2012. doi:10.1134/S1063778812020123

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063778812020123 2012

  47. [49]

    De Romeri, O

    V. De Romeri, O. G. Miranda, D. K. Papoulias, G. Sanchez Garcia, M. Tórtola, and J. W. F. Valle. Physics implications of a combined analysis of COHERENT CsI and LAr data.JHEP, 04:035, 2023. arXiv:2211.11905,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2023)035

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2023)035 2023

  48. [50]

    O. G. Miranda, D. K. Papoulias, G. Sanchez Garcia, O. Sanders, M. Tórtola, and J. W. F. Valle. Implications of the first detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEvNS) with Liquid Argon.JHEP, 05:130, 2020. [Erratum: JHEP 01, 067 (2021)].arXiv:2003.12050,doi:10.1007/ JHEP05(2020)130

    arXiv 2020