pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.24328 · v2 · pith:J7NHY2KHnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · ✦ hep-th

Dark-Sector Deformations of Holographic Anisotropic Superfluids in Asymptotically Hyperscaling Violation Geometry

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 22:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords holographysuperfluidsdark sectorhyperscaling violationentanglement entropyanisotropyportal coupling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dark scalar portal weakly suppresses strip anisotropy in holographic superfluids at vanishing strength

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates deformations of holographic anisotropic p-wave superfluids by dark-sector portals in hyperscaling-violating black brane geometries. Visible sector fields set the chemical potential and produce anisotropic entanglement entropy for strips. Adding a kinetic portal from a dark scalar deforms the equations, and the resulting strip susceptibility at zero portal coupling is found to be negative in four and five dimensions. This indicates that the portal reduces the anisotropy induced by the visible condensate. The effect is interpreted through the holographic renormalization group, with the dark scalar affecting the infrared while narrow strips see mostly the ultraviolet boundary region.

Core claim

The main result is a strip susceptibility at vanishing portal strength. It is negative in the D=4 and D=5 backgrounds, so the portal weakly suppresses visible strip anisotropy. This has a holographic RG interpretation: the normalizable dark scalar is weighted toward the IR horizon, while narrow strips probe the UV near-boundary RT region. Thus, the portal decouples in the UV and the susceptibility vanishes quadratically with strip width.

What carries the argument

The kinetic dark-scalar portal Z_dm(Φ) which deforms the Yang-Mills operator in the visible sector.

If this is right

  • The critical shift depends on the hyperscaling-violating background and can change sign.
  • Hidden-current mixing provides a solvable example of hidden gauge sectors.
  • Isotropic dark sources cancel their contribution to the strip difference.
  • Visible quantities like critical chemical potential and condensate vary with dimension and hyperscaling exponents.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The suppression effect might allow dark sectors to control anisotropy in holographic models of condensed matter systems.
  • Wider strips, which probe deeper into the bulk, should exhibit stronger influence from the dark sector.
  • This perturbative approach could be extended to non-perturbative regimes to check if the suppression persists.

Load-bearing premise

The dark-scalar portal can be treated as a small perturbative deformation of the visible sector without causing significant backreaction on the background geometry.

What would settle it

Computing the strip susceptibility explicitly in the D=4 case at zero portal strength and finding it positive rather than negative would falsify the suppression claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.24328 by Ji-Seong Chae.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Strip-entanglement anisotropy in D = 4 and D = 5. Panels (a) and (b) show |O(2) 12 |; panels (c) and (d) show the fractional change relative to the visible result. Case II gives the constant benchmark reduction, the isotropic mass portal lies on the visible curve, and the self-consistent kinetic portal with β = 0.8, Φh = 0.6 gives a small width-dependent suppression. The same b (Z) 0 and ωZ profiles are us… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Self-consistent tensor-portal susceptibility for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Critical scale across D = 3, 4, 5. Columns correspond to the three bulk dimensions. The first two rows show the solver boundary amplitude b∞,c = √ 3 µc as a function of ϑ at z = 1 and as a function of z at ϑ = 1; the last two rows show the corresponding fractional shift, which is the same for b∞,c and µc. Case I is omitted because it coincides with the visible curve. Case II uses αdm = 0.8. The tensor port… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Self-consistent radial data at the D = 4 reference background (top row) and the D = 5 reference background (bottom row). From left to right the panels show ω1(ξ), b0(ξ), and Saniso(ξ). The visible solution is compared with the Case-II benchmark and the kinetic portal at β = 0.8, Φh = 0.6. The kinetic portal does not act as a simple multiplicative weight: both radial fields move before the source is evaluat… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Dark-minus-visible traceless source in D = 4 and D = 5. The Case-II curve is the rigid benchmark rescaling. The tensor-portal curve is the full difference Saniso[b (Z) 0 , ωZ, Z] − Saniso[b0, ω, 1], not the source-only approximation (Z − 1)S vis aniso. Its sign changes along the radial direction, which produces the partial cancellation seen in the strip susceptibility. The radial source changes appreciably… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Nonlinear condensate ⟨O⟩ 1/∆O versus µ/µc,vis in D = 3, 4, 5. Each panel compares the visible branch with Case II hidden-current mixing at αdm = 0.4 and 0.8. The vertical guide lines mark the corresponding critical shifts q 1 − α 2 dm/4, while the curves show that the source-free ordered branch follows the same displacement predicted by the linear analysis. These curves are used as consistency checks, not … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Case-II hidden-SU(2) rescaling factors controlled by αdm. The critical chemical-potential factor and the order-ϵ 2 HEE source factor follow from the same constant kinetic-mixing rescaling. The plot is kept as a benchmark rather than as the main result. 34 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Case-II condensate curves at the analytic reference backgrounds in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Case-II condensate overlay at fixed αdm = 0.8 and z = 1, with visible curves dashed and dark curves solid. Each color corresponds to a different ϑ. The hidden-sector curve associated with a given visible curve starts at lower µ/µc,vis, while the overall branch shape still reflects the visible HSV exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Case-II condensate overlay at fixed αdm = 0.8 along representative z-slices of the controlled reference backgrounds. Visible curves are dashed and dark curves are solid. The plot shows that the universal hidden-sector shift and the residual z-dependence of the visible condensate can be disentan￾gled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Leading strip entropy and first-law check in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Leading strip entropy and first-law check in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Leading strip entropy and first-law check in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study dark-sector deformations of holographic anisotropic \(p\)-wave superfluids in hyperscaling-violating black-brane backgrounds. In the visible \(SU(2)\) sector, \(b(u)\) fixes the chemical potential and charge density, while \(\omega(u)\) condenses and selects a boundary direction, producing anisotropic strip entanglement. The visible critical chemical potential, radial profiles, condensate branch, and strip-entanglement difference vary with dimension and hyperscaling-violating exponents. We then add hidden gauge sectors and hidden dark-scalar portals. Hidden-current mixing gives a solvable example, whereas isotropic dark sources cancel in the strip difference. For the kinetic dark-scalar portal, \(Z_{\rm dm}(\Phi)\) deforms the Yang--Mills operator; hence \(b_0(u)\), \(\omega_1(u)\), and the order-\(\epsilon^2\) anisotropic stress are computed in the same deformed problem. The critical shift depends on the hyperscaling-violating background and can change sign. The main result is a strip susceptibility at vanishing portal strength. It is negative in the \(D=4\) and \(D=5\) backgrounds, so the portal weakly suppresses visible strip anisotropy. This has a holographic RG interpretation: the normalizable dark scalar is weighted toward the IR horizon, while narrow strips probe the UV near-boundary RT region. Thus, the portal decouples in the UV and the susceptibility vanishes quadratically with strip width; wider strips reach deeper into the bulk and recover the IR dark-sector effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper studies dark-sector deformations of holographic anisotropic p-wave superfluids in hyperscaling-violating black-brane backgrounds. In the visible SU(2) sector, it examines how b(u) sets the chemical potential and charge density while ω(u) condenses to produce anisotropic strip entanglement. It then introduces hidden gauge sectors and a kinetic dark-scalar portal Z_dm(Φ) that deforms the Yang-Mills operator. The central result is the strip susceptibility at vanishing portal strength ε, which is negative for D=4 and D=5 backgrounds, implying that the portal weakly suppresses visible strip anisotropy. The analysis includes dependence on dimension and hyperscaling exponents, plus a holographic RG interpretation linking the IR-weighted normalizable dark scalar to UV decoupling for narrow strips.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work provides a concrete holographic example of how a perturbative dark-sector portal can modulate visible-sector observables such as strip entanglement anisotropy, with an explicit RG interpretation of UV/IR decoupling. The sign change of the susceptibility with background parameters and the cancellation properties for isotropic sources are potentially useful for model-building in holographic dark-sector scenarios.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and the paragraph describing the kinetic portal: the central claim (negative strip susceptibility at vanishing portal strength) is obtained by solving the deformed equations for b0(u), ω1(u) and the O(ε²) anisotropic stress while treating the hyperscaling-violating black-brane geometry as fixed. No explicit check is given that the stress-energy of the normalizable dark scalar induces only O(ε²) corrections to the radial warp factor or blackening function; if backreaction enters at O(ε), both the extracted susceptibility and its reported sign become unreliable. This assumption is load-bearing for the main result.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the constructive comment on the backreaction of the normalizable dark scalar. We address the concern below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of this point.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and the paragraph describing the kinetic portal: the central claim (negative strip susceptibility at vanishing portal strength) is obtained by solving the deformed equations for b0(u), ω1(u) and the O(ε^{2}) anisotropic stress while treating the hyperscaling-violating black-brane geometry as fixed. No explicit check is given that the stress-energy of the normalizable dark scalar induces only O(ε^{2}) corrections to the radial warp factor or blackening function; if backreaction enters at O(ε), both the extracted susceptibility and its reported sign become unreliable. This assumption is load-bearing for the main result.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the backreaction order is necessary to confirm the reliability of the susceptibility and its sign. The current analysis solves the deformed visible-sector equations on the fixed hyperscaling-violating background, which is the standard probe approximation for such portal deformations. The normalizable dark scalar is IR-weighted, which already suggests suppression of its stress-energy contribution near the boundary (relevant for narrow strips). To address the referee's point directly, we will add a new appendix that computes the leading O(ε^{2}) corrections to the metric functions induced by the dark scalar's stress-energy tensor and verifies that these corrections do not modify the O(ε^{2}) anisotropic stress or the extracted susceptibility at leading order for the D=4 and D=5 backgrounds. This will explicitly confirm that backreaction remains subleading and does not affect the reported sign. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is a direct perturbative computation within the model

full rationale

The paper computes the strip susceptibility by explicitly solving the deformed Yang-Mills equations with the Z_dm(Phi) portal term for b0(u), omega1(u) and the O(epsilon^2) stress tensor in the fixed hyperscaling-violating background. This is a standard holographic calculation of a derived quantity from the bulk equations rather than a self-definitional loop, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from prior author work in the provided text, and the result is not equivalent to its inputs by construction. The model is self-contained as a theoretical derivation without external data fitting.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard holographic dictionary, the existence of a hyperscaling-violating black-brane solution, and the perturbative treatment of the portal; no independent evidence is given for any of these within the abstract.

free parameters (2)
  • hyperscaling-violating exponents
    Define the background geometry and are varied to obtain the D=4,5 results; their values are inputs rather than derived.
  • portal coupling strength epsilon
    Expanded to second order; the susceptibility is the coefficient of the linear term in epsilon.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Einstein-Yang-Mills equations admit hyperscaling-violating black-brane solutions with the stated asymptotics
    Invoked to set up the visible-sector background before the portal is added.
  • ad hoc to paper The dark scalar is normalizable and does not back-react at leading order
    Required for the perturbative expansion of b0(u) and omega1(u).
invented entities (1)
  • kinetic dark-scalar portal Z_dm(Phi) no independent evidence
    purpose: Deforms the visible Yang-Mills kinetic term to couple hidden and visible sectors
    Postulated to generate the deformation; no independent evidence supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5813 in / 1567 out tokens · 24793 ms · 2026-06-25T22:38:16.122336+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

  2. [2]

    Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory,” Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109]

  3. [3]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep- th/9802150]

  4. [4]

    Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz, “Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,” Phys. Rept.323(2000) 183 [hep-th/9905111]

  5. [5]

    Minkowski-space correlators in AdS/CFT correspondence,

    D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, “Minkowski-space correlators in AdS/CFT correspondence,” JHEP 09(2002) 042 [hep-th/0205051]

  6. [6]

    Universality of the hydrodynamic limit in AdS/CFT and the membrane paradigm,

    N. Iqbal and H. Liu, “Universality of the hydrodynamic limit in AdS/CFT and the membrane paradigm,” Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 025023 [arXiv:0809.3808]. 40

  7. [7]

    The shear viscosity of strongly coupled N=4 supersymmetric Yang–Mills plasma,

    G. Policastro, D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, “The shear viscosity of strongly coupled N=4 supersymmetric Yang–Mills plasma,” Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 081601 [hep-th/0104066]

  8. [8]

    From AdS/CFT correspondence to hydrodynam- ics,

    G. Policastro, D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, “From AdS/CFT correspondence to hydrodynam- ics,” JHEP09(2002) 043 [hep-th/0205052]

  9. [9]

    Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics,

    P. Kovtun, D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, “Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005) 111601 [hep-th/0405231]

  10. [10]

    Nonlinear fluid dynamics from gravity,

    S. Bhattacharyya, V. E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla and M. Rangamani, “Nonlinear fluid dynamics from gravity,” JHEP02(2008) 045 [arXiv:0712.2456]

  11. [11]

    Forced fluid dynamics from gravity,

    S. Bhattacharyya, R. Loganayagam, S. Minwalla, S. Nampuri, S. P. Trivedi and S. R. Wadia, “Forced fluid dynamics from gravity,” JHEP02(2009) 018 [arXiv:0806.0006]

  12. [12]

    The gravity dual of a p-wave superconductor,

    S. S. Gubser and S. S. Pufu, “The gravity dual of a p-wave superconductor,” JHEP11(2008) 033 [arXiv:0805.2960]

  13. [13]

    Pseudogap and time reversal breaking in a holographic superconductor,

    M. M. Roberts and S. A. Hartnoll, “Pseudogap and time reversal breaking in a holographic superconductor,” JHEP08(2008) 035 [arXiv:0805.3898]

  14. [14]

    Non-universal shear viscosity from Einstein gravity,

    J. Erdmenger, P. Kerner and H. Zeller, “Non-universal shear viscosity from Einstein gravity,” Phys. Lett. B699(2011) 301 [arXiv:1011.5912]

  15. [15]

    Analytic approaches to anisotropic holographic superfluids,

    P. Basu and J. H. Oh, “Analytic approaches to anisotropic holographic superfluids,” JHEP07 (2012) 106 [arXiv:1109.4592]

  16. [16]

    Running shear viscosities in anisotropic holographic superfluids,

    J. H. Oh, “Running shear viscosities in anisotropic holographic superfluids,” JHEP06(2012) 103 [arXiv:1201.5605]

  17. [17]

    Two U(1)’s and epsilon charge shifts,

    B. Holdom, “Two U(1)’s and epsilon charge shifts,” Phys. Lett. B166(1986) 196

  18. [18]

    Kinetic mixing and the supersymmetric gauge hierarchy,

    K. R. Dienes, C. F. Kolda and J. March-Russell, “Kinetic mixing and the supersymmetric gauge hierarchy,” Nucl. Phys. B492(1997) 104 [hep-ph/9610479]

  19. [19]

    Brane-antibrane kinetic mixing, millicharged particles and SUSY breaking,

    S. A. Abel and B. W. Schofield, “Brane-antibrane kinetic mixing, millicharged particles and SUSY breaking,” Nucl. Phys. B685(2004) 150 [hep-th/0311051]

  20. [20]

    Illuminating the hidden sector of string theory by shining light through a magnetic field,

    S. A. Abel, J. Jaeckel, V. V. Khoze and A. Ringwald, “Illuminating the hidden sector of string theory by shining light through a magnetic field,” Phys. Lett. B666(2008) 66 [hep-ph/0608248]

  21. [21]

    Kinetic mixing of the photon with hidden U(1)s in string phenomenology,

    S. A. Abel, M. D. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, V. V. Khoze and A. Ringwald, “Kinetic mixing of the photon with hidden U(1)s in string phenomenology,” JHEP07(2008) 124 [arXiv:0803.1449]

  22. [22]

    Analytic study on backreacting holographic superconductors with dark matter sector,

    L. Nakonieczny and M. Rogatko, “Analytic study on backreacting holographic superconductors with dark matter sector,” Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 106004 [arXiv:1411.0798]. 41

  23. [23]

    Magnetic field in holographic superconductors with dark matter sector,

    L. Nakonieczny, M. Rogatko and K. I. Wysoki´ nski, “Magnetic field in holographic superconductors with dark matter sector,” Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 046007 [arXiv:1501.04902]

  24. [24]

    Analytic investigation of holographic phase transitions influenced by dark matter sector,

    L. Nakonieczny, M. Rogatko and K. I. Wysoki´ nski, “Analytic investigation of holographic phase transitions influenced by dark matter sector,” Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 066008 [arXiv:1509.01769]

  25. [25]

    P-wave holographic superconductor/insulator phase transi- tions affected by dark matter sector,

    M. Rogatko and K. I. Wysoki´ nski, “P-wave holographic superconductor/insulator phase transi- tions affected by dark matter sector,” JHEP03(2016) 215 [arXiv:1508.02869]

  26. [26]

    Holographic vortices in the presence of dark matter sector,

    M. Rogatko and K. I. Wysoki´ nski, “Holographic vortices in the presence of dark matter sector,” JHEP12(2015) 041 [arXiv:1510.06137]

  27. [27]

    Condensate flow in holographic models in the presence of dark matter,

    M. Rogatko and K. I. Wysoki´ nski, “Condensate flow in holographic models in the presence of dark matter,” JHEP10(2016) 152 [arXiv:1608.00343]

  28. [28]

    Holographic entanglement entropy in superconductor phase transition with dark matter sector,

    Y. Peng, “Holographic entanglement entropy in superconductor phase transition with dark matter sector,” Phys. Lett. B750(2015) 420 [arXiv:1507.07399]

  29. [29]

    A general holographic insulator/superconductor model with dark matter sector away from the probe limit,

    Y. Peng, Q. Pan and Y. Liu, “A general holographic insulator/superconductor model with dark matter sector away from the probe limit,” Nucl. Phys. B915(2017) 69 [arXiv:1512.08950]

  30. [30]

    C. Park, G. Kim, J. s. Chae and J. H. Oh, JHEP02, 182 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2023)182 [arXiv:2210.08919 [hep-th]]

  31. [31]

    Holographic DC SQUID in the presence of dark matter,

    B. Kiczek, M. Rogatko and K. I. Wysoki´ nski, “Holographic DC SQUID in the presence of dark matter,” arXiv:1904.00653

  32. [32]

    Two interacting current model of holographic Dirac fluid in graphene,

    M. Rogatko and K. I. Wysoki´ nski, “Two interacting current model of holographic Dirac fluid in graphene,” Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 024053 [arXiv:1708.08051]

  33. [33]

    Holographic calculation of magneto-transport coefficients in Dirac semimetals,

    M. Rogatko and K. I. Wysoki´ nski, “Holographic calculation of magneto-transport coefficients in Dirac semimetals,” JHEP01(2018) 078 [arXiv:1710.05002]

  34. [34]

    Viscosity bound for anisotropic superfluids with dark matter sector,

    M. Rogatko and K. I. Wysoki´ nski, “Viscosity bound for anisotropic superfluids with dark matter sector,” Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 026015 [arXiv:1612.02593]

  35. [35]

    Aspects of holography for theories with hyperscaling violation,

    X. Dong, S. Harrison, S. Kachru, G. Torroba and H. Wang, “Aspects of holography for theories with hyperscaling violation,” JHEP06(2012) 041 [arXiv:1201.1905]

  36. [36]

    Generalized holographic quantum criticality at finite density,

    B. Gout´ eraux and E. Kiritsis, “Generalized holographic quantum criticality at finite density,” JHEP12(2011) 036 [arXiv:1107.2116]

  37. [37]

    Hidden Fermi surfaces in compressible states of gauge- gravity duality,

    L. Huijse, S. Sachdev and B. Swingle, “Hidden Fermi surfaces in compressible states of gauge- gravity duality,” Phys. Rev. B85(2012) 035121 [arXiv:1112.0573]

  38. [38]

    Charged Black Branes with Hyperscaling Violating Factor,

    M. Alishahiha, E. O. Colgain and H. Yavartanoo, “Charged Black Branes with Hyperscaling Violating Factor,” JHEP11(2012) 137 [arXiv:1209.3946]. 42

  39. [39]

    Analytic approaches to anisotropic holographic superfluids in asymptotically hyperscaling violation geometry,

    G. Kim, Y. S. Choi and J. H. Oh, “Analytic approaches to anisotropic holographic superfluids in asymptotically hyperscaling violation geometry,” arXiv:2504.13635

  40. [40]

    Holographic study ofT ¯Tlike deformed HV QFTs: holographic entanglement entropy,

    H.-S. Jeong, W.-B. Pan, Y.-W. Sun and Y.-T. Wang, “Holographic study ofT ¯Tlike deformed HV QFTs: holographic entanglement entropy,” JHEP02(2023) 018 [arXiv:2211.00518]

  41. [41]

    On shape dependence of holographic entanglement entropy in AdS 4/CFT3 with Lifshitz scaling and hyperscaling violation,

    G. Cavini, D. Seminara, J. Sisti and E. Tonni, “On shape dependence of holographic entanglement entropy in AdS 4/CFT3 with Lifshitz scaling and hyperscaling violation,” JHEP02(2020) 172 [arXiv:1907.10030]

  42. [42]

    Learning geometries beyond asymptotic AdS,

    C. Ran, S.-F. Wu and Z.-Y. Xian, “Learning geometries beyond asymptotic AdS,” JHEP03 (2026) 031 [arXiv:2508.05808]

  43. [43]

    Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001]

  44. [44]

    Aspects of holographic entanglement entropy,

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Aspects of holographic entanglement entropy,” JHEP08(2006) 045 [hep-th/0605073]

  45. [45]

    Entanglement entropy, conformal invariance and extrinsic geometry,

    S. N. Solodukhin, “Entanglement entropy, conformal invariance and extrinsic geometry,” Phys. Lett. B665(2008) 305 [arXiv:0802.3117]

  46. [46]

    On holographic entanglement entropy and higher curvature gravity,

    L.-Y. Hung, R. C. Myers and M. Smolkin, “On holographic entanglement entropy and higher curvature gravity,” JHEP04(2011) 025 [arXiv:1101.5813]

  47. [47]

    Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement en- tropy,

    H. Casini, M. Huerta and R. C. Myers, “Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement en- tropy,” JHEP05(2011) 036 [arXiv:1102.0440]

  48. [48]

    Thermodynamical property of en- tanglement entropy for excited states,

    J. Bhattacharya, M. Nozaki, T. Takayanagi and T. Ugajin, “Thermodynamical property of en- tanglement entropy for excited states,” Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 091602 [arXiv:1212.1164]

  49. [49]

    On the architecture of spacetime geometry,

    E. Bianchi and R. C. Myers, “On the architecture of spacetime geometry,” Class. Quant. Grav. 31(2014) 214002 [arXiv:1212.5183]

  50. [50]

    Dynamics of entanglement entropy from Einstein equation,

    M. Nozaki, T. Numasawa, A. Prudenziati and T. Takayanagi, “Dynamics of entanglement entropy from Einstein equation,” Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 026012 [arXiv:1304.7100]

  51. [51]

    Entanglement entropy: a perturbative calculation,

    V. Rosenhaus and M. Smolkin, “Entanglement entropy: a perturbative calculation,” JHEP12 (2014) 179 [arXiv:1403.3733]

  52. [52]

    Entanglement entropy, planar surfaces, and spectral functions,

    V. Rosenhaus and M. Smolkin, “Entanglement entropy, planar surfaces, and spectral functions,” JHEP02(2015) 015 [arXiv:1410.6530]

  53. [53]

    Colorful horizons with charge,

    S. S. Gubser, “Colorful horizons with charge,” Phys. Rev. Lett.101(2008) 191601 [arXiv:0803.3483]

  54. [54]

    Building a holographic superconductor,

    S. A. Hartnoll, C. P. Herzog and G. T. Horowitz, “Building a holographic superconductor,” Phys. Rev. Lett.101(2008) 031601 [arXiv:0803.3295]. 43

  55. [55]

    Holographic superconductors,

    S. A. Hartnoll, C. P. Herzog and G. T. Horowitz, “Holographic superconductors,” JHEP12 (2008) 015 [arXiv:0810.1563]

  56. [56]

    Lectures on holographic superfluidity and superconductivity,

    C. P. Herzog, “Lectures on holographic superfluidity and superconductivity,” J. Phys. A42(2009) 343001 [arXiv:0904.1975]

  57. [57]

    Introduction to holographic superconductors,

    G. T. Horowitz, “Introduction to holographic superconductors,” Lect. Notes Phys.828(2011) 313 [arXiv:1002.1722]

  58. [58]

    Phase transition in anisotropic holographic superfluids with arbitraryzandα,

    M. Park, J. Park and J. H. Oh, “Phase transition in anisotropic holographic superfluids with arbitraryzandα,” Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 810 [arXiv:1609.08241]

  59. [59]

    Superconductivity from gauge/gravity duality with flavor,

    M. Ammon, J. Erdmenger, M. Kaminski and P. Kerner, “Superconductivity from gauge/gravity duality with flavor,” Phys. Lett. B680(2009) 516 [arXiv:0810.2316]

  60. [60]

    Competition between the s-wave and p-wave su- perconductivity phases in a holographic model,

    Z.-Y. Nie, R.-G. Cai, X. Gao and H. Zhang, “Competition between the s-wave and p-wave su- perconductivity phases in a holographic model,” JHEP11(2013) 087 [arXiv:1309.2204]

  61. [61]

    Phase diagram of a holographic superconductor model with s-wave and p-wave,

    T. Nishida, “Phase diagram of a holographic superconductor model with s-wave and p-wave,” JHEP09(2014) 154 [arXiv:1403.6070]

  62. [62]

    Competition between s-wave order and p-wave order in holographic superconductors,

    W. Li, “Competition between s-wave order and p-wave order in holographic superconductors,” JHEP11(2014) 147 [arXiv:1405.0382]

  63. [63]

    Introduction to holographic superconductor models,

    R.-G. Cai, L. Li, L.-F. Li and R.-Q. Yang, “Introduction to holographic superconductor models,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.58(2015) 060401 [arXiv:1502.00437]

  64. [64]

    On holographic p-wave superfluids with back-reaction,

    M. Ammon, J. Erdmenger, V. Grass, P. Kerner and A. O’Bannon, “On holographic p-wave superfluids with back-reaction,” Phys. Lett. B686(2010) 192 [arXiv:0912.3515]

  65. [65]

    Holographic superfluidity in imbalanced mixtures,

    J. Erdmenger, V. Grass, P. Kerner and T. H. Ngo, “Holographic superfluidity in imbalanced mixtures,” JHEP08(2011) 037 [arXiv:1103.4145]

  66. [66]

    Lectures on holographic methods for condensed matter physics,

    S. A. Hartnoll, “Lectures on holographic methods for condensed matter physics,” Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009) 224002 [arXiv:0903.3246]

  67. [67]

    Holographic duality with a view toward many-body physics,

    J. McGreevy, “Holographic duality with a view toward many-body physics,” Adv. High Energy Phys.2010(2010) 723105 [arXiv:0909.0518]

  68. [68]

    Effective holographic theories for low-temperature condensed matter systems,

    C. Charmousis, B. Gouteraux, B. S. Kim, E. Kiritsis and R. Meyer, “Effective holographic theories for low-temperature condensed matter systems,” JHEP11(2010) 151 [arXiv:1005.4690]

  69. [69]

    Quantum critical lines in holographic phases with (un)broken symmetry,

    B. Gouteraux and E. Kiritsis, “Quantum critical lines in holographic phases with (un)broken symmetry,” JHEP04(2013) 053 [arXiv:1212.2625]

  70. [70]

    On holographic insulators and supersolids,

    E. Kiritsis and J. Ren, “On holographic insulators and supersolids,” JHEP09(2015) 168 [arXiv:1503.03481]. 44

  71. [71]

    Gravity duals of Lifshitz-like fixed points,

    S. Kachru, X. Liu and M. Mulligan, “Gravity duals of Lifshitz-like fixed points,” Phys. Rev. D 78(2008) 106005 [arXiv:0808.1725]

  72. [72]

    Non-relativistic holography,

    M. Taylor, “Non-relativistic holography,” arXiv:0812.0530

  73. [73]

    Small hairy black holes in global AdS spacetime,

    S. Bhattacharyya, S. Minwalla and K. Papadodimas, “Small hairy black holes in global AdS spacetime,” JHEP11(2011) 035 [arXiv:1005.1287]

  74. [74]

    Superconductivity from D3/D7: holographic pion superfluid,

    P. Basu, J. He, A. Mukherjee and H.-H. Shieh, “Superconductivity from D3/D7: holographic pion superfluid,” JHEP11(2009) 070 [arXiv:0810.3970]

  75. [75]

    The anisotropic N=4 super Yang–Mills plasma and its instabili- ties,

    D. Mateos and D. Trancanelli, “The anisotropic N=4 super Yang–Mills plasma and its instabili- ties,” Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 101601 [arXiv:1105.3472]

  76. [76]

    Violation of the holographic viscosity bound in a strongly coupled anisotropic plasma,

    A. Rebhan and D. Steineder, “Violation of the holographic viscosity bound in a strongly coupled anisotropic plasma,” Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 021601 [arXiv:1110.6825]. 45