pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.24613 · v1 · pith:52IR2GTGnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-ph· hep-th· quant-ph

The ω-Effect from a Multimode Squeezed Graviton State

Nick E. Mavromatos , Sarben Sarkar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 22:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-phhep-thquant-ph
keywords ω-effectCPT violationsqueezed graviton statesTakagi decompositionneutral mesonsaxion cloudKerr black holequantum gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

A multimode squeezed graviton state from an axion cloud around a Kerr black hole generates the ω-effect in entangled neutral-meson systems through anomalous correlators.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives the ω-effect, a parametrization of CPT violation in neutral-meson entanglement, from a microscopic model of squeezed gravitons produced by an axion cloud around a Kerr black hole. The graviton field is decomposed using the Takagi method into independent squeezed supermodes that carry anomalous correlators. After the meson system interacts with and then traces over this graviton bath, the correlators combine with weak-interaction flavour mixing to create transitions between the antisymmetric and symmetric two-meson sectors. The result is a small symmetric admixture in the usual antisymmetric EPR state, with the size of the admixture given by an explicit sum over the supermodes weighted by their squeezing amplitudes, phases, and the mixing matrix element.

Core claim

The graviton field generated by an axion cloud around a Kerr black hole is expressed, via the Takagi decomposition of its complex symmetric squeezing kernel, as a set of independent squeezed supermodes possessing anomalous correlators. These correlators survive tracing over the inaccessible graviton degrees of freedom and, together with the weak-interaction flavour-mixing matrix element, induce transitions between the antisymmetric and symmetric two-meson sectors. This produces a small exchange-symmetric admixture, parametrized by ω, in the otherwise antisymmetric EPR state, where ω is given by a sum over the Takagi supermodes weighted by their squeezing amplitudes and phases together with t

What carries the argument

The Takagi decomposition of the complex symmetric squeezing kernel, which expresses the graviton field as independent squeezed supermodes whose anomalous correlators survive tracing over the bath and combine with weak mixing to generate the ω-effect.

If this is right

  • The ω parameter receives an explicit microscopic expression as a sum over Takagi supermodes weighted by squeezing amplitudes, phases, and the weak-interaction mixing matrix element.
  • Anomalous graviton correlators supply a calculable quantum replacement for the phenomenological variances used in earlier D-particle foam models of the ω-effect.
  • The ω-effect emerges as a signature of non-classical squeezed states in gravitational environments rather than a model-specific artifact.
  • The same mechanism can be applied to other astrophysical or microscopic black-hole sources that produce squeezed graviton states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Bounds on ω from meson experiments could be reinterpreted as constraints on the squeezing parameters of axion clouds around astrophysical black holes.
  • The framework suggests testing for analogous admixture effects in other entangled systems placed in non-classical gravitational backgrounds.
  • If the Takagi-supermode picture holds, the ω-effect should appear generically whenever a quantum system interacts with a multimode squeezed gravitational field.

Load-bearing premise

The graviton field generated by the axion cloud around a Kerr black hole can be expressed via the Takagi decomposition of a complex symmetric squeezing kernel as independent squeezed supermodes possessing anomalous correlators that survive tracing over the bath.

What would settle it

A precision measurement of the ω parameter in neutral-meson systems that shows no dependence on the squeezing amplitudes or phases predicted from axion-cloud models around Kerr black holes would falsify the claimed microscopic origin.

read the original abstract

The $\omega$-effect in entangled neutral-meson systems provides a sensitive probe of CPT violation induced by quantum-gravitational environments. In open quantum systems, interactions with inaccessible gravitational degrees of freedom can render the reduced meson dynamics non-unitary, causing the CPT operator to become ill-defined, even when the underlying microscopic Hamiltonian is CPT invariant. We present a microscopic derivation of the $\omega$-effect arising from a multimode squeezed gravitational environment generated by an axion cloud around a Kerr black hole. Using the Takagi decomposition of the associated complex symmetric squeezing kernel, the graviton field is expressed in terms of independent squeezed supermodes possessing anomalous correlators. These correlators provide a microscopic quantum counterpart of the stochastic fluctuations that appear in earlier D-particle foam descriptions of the $\omega$-effect, replacing phenomenological variances of flavour-changing D-particle recoil by calculable graviton correlation functions. After tracing over the graviton bath, the anomalous correlators and the weak-interactions-induced mixing combine to generate transitions between the antisymmetric and symmetric two-meson sectors. This results in a small exchange-symmetric admixture, parametrised by $\omega$, in the otherwise antisymmetric EPR state. We obtain an explicit expression for $\omega$ in terms of a sum over Takagi supermodes weighted by their squeezing amplitudes and phases together with the weak-interaction flavour-mixing matrix element. The resulting framework suggests that the $\omega$-effect may be a generic signature of non-classical states of gravitational environments, extending beyond the specific axion-cloud scenario considered here. The observability of the $\omega$-effect from other astrophysical and microscopic black-hole sources is discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims a microscopic derivation of the ω-effect in entangled neutral-meson systems from a multimode squeezed graviton environment generated by an axion cloud around a Kerr black hole. The graviton field is decomposed via the Takagi factorization of the complex symmetric squeezing kernel into independent squeezed supermodes carrying anomalous correlators; after tracing over the inaccessible graviton bath these correlators, together with the weak-interaction flavour-mixing matrix element, induce a small exchange-symmetric admixture in the otherwise antisymmetric EPR state, yielding an explicit expression for the CPT-violating parameter ω as a weighted sum over the supermodes.

Significance. If the central derivation is free of circularity, the work supplies a concrete quantum-field-theoretic mechanism that replaces the phenomenological variances of earlier D-particle-foam models with calculable graviton correlation functions. It thereby links a measurable low-energy CPT-violating signature directly to the non-classical state of a gravitational environment and indicates that the ω-effect may be generic for squeezed graviton baths, with possible extensions to other astrophysical black-hole sources.

major comments (2)
  1. [Derivation of the reduced meson dynamics and the expression for ω] The abstract states that an 'explicit expression for ω' is obtained as a sum over Takagi supermodes weighted by squeezing amplitudes and phases together with the weak-interaction mixing matrix element. The derivation that produces this sum (presumably in the section that combines the reduced meson density matrix with the anomalous correlators) must be checked to confirm that the squeezing amplitudes and phases are fixed by the axion-cloud dynamics rather than adjusted to reproduce a target value of ω; otherwise the result reduces to a reparametrization rather than a microscopic prediction.
  2. [Tracing over the graviton bath and emergence of the ω admixture] The claim that the anomalous correlators 'survive tracing over the graviton bath' and generate transitions between symmetric and antisymmetric two-meson sectors is load-bearing for the entire construction. The explicit partial-trace calculation that demonstrates the survival of these correlators (and their subsequent contraction with the flavour-mixing matrix) must be presented without additional phenomenological assumptions; if the trace is performed only formally, the microscopic status of the result remains unestablished.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for highlighting the importance of verifying the microscopic character of the derivation. We address the two major comments below, providing clarifications on how the axion-cloud dynamics fix the squeezing parameters and on the explicit nature of the partial trace. We have revised the manuscript to make these steps fully transparent.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The abstract states that an 'explicit expression for ω' is obtained as a sum over Takagi supermodes weighted by squeezing amplitudes and phases together with the weak-interaction mixing matrix element. The derivation that produces this sum (presumably in the section that combines the reduced meson density matrix with the anomalous correlators) must be checked to confirm that the squeezing amplitudes and phases are fixed by the axion-cloud dynamics rather than adjusted to reproduce a target value of ω; otherwise the result reduces to a reparametrization rather than a microscopic prediction.

    Authors: The squeezing kernel is constructed directly from the axion-graviton interaction Hamiltonian in the Kerr background (Section II), with amplitudes and phases determined by the axion mass, decay constant, and cloud density profile. The Takagi factorization is applied to this fixed kernel; the resulting supermode parameters are therefore outputs of the astrophysical model, not free inputs tuned to ω. The expression for ω follows by contracting these parameters with the meson mixing matrix after the trace. To eliminate any ambiguity we have inserted a new subsection (III.B) that explicitly maps the axion-cloud parameters onto the squeezing amplitudes and phases before the Takagi step. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The claim that the anomalous correlators 'survive tracing over the graviton bath' and generate transitions between symmetric and antisymmetric two-meson sectors is load-bearing for the entire construction. The explicit partial-trace calculation that demonstrates the survival of these correlators (and their subsequent contraction with the flavour-mixing matrix) must be presented without additional phenomenological assumptions; if the trace is performed only formally, the microscopic status of the result remains unestablished.

    Authors: Section IV derives the reduced meson density matrix by performing the partial trace over the multimode squeezed graviton state expressed in the Takagi basis. The anomalous correlators appear as off-diagonal elements that survive the trace because the graviton bath is traced out while the meson-graviton interaction remains unitary; no additional stochastic assumptions are introduced. The subsequent contraction with the weak-interaction mixing matrix that produces the symmetric admixture is written explicitly. We have expanded Appendix C with the complete algebraic steps of the trace, including the explicit matrix elements of the reduced density operator, to make the calculation fully reproducible. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe a microscopic derivation of the ω-effect via Takagi decomposition of the squeezing kernel, anomalous correlators after tracing over the graviton bath, and combination with the weak-interaction mixing matrix to produce an explicit sum expression for ω. No equations or steps are exhibited that reduce ω to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The derivation is presented as following from the model assumptions without internal reduction to its own inputs. This is the normal case of a self-contained calculation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies insufficient detail to enumerate free parameters, axioms, or invented entities exhaustively; the following entries are extracted directly from statements in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • squeezing amplitudes and phases
    The explicit expression for ω is a weighted sum over these quantities; their values are not derived from first principles in the visible text.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The underlying microscopic Hamiltonian is CPT invariant
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the setting in which the reduced dynamics still produces an ill-defined CPT operator.
invented entities (1)
  • multimode squeezed graviton state from axion cloud no independent evidence
    purpose: To furnish the inaccessible gravitational degrees of freedom whose anomalous correlators generate the ω-effect after tracing
    Introduced as the concrete realization of the quantum-gravitational environment; no independent evidence supplied in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5835 in / 1437 out tokens · 25385 ms · 2026-06-25T22:59:47.928508+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 21 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    the underlying field-theoretic energy–momentum tensorT µν(x)

  2. [2]

    the graviton-mode-projected operatorT α

  3. [3]

    Confusing these three objects obscures the origin of the transition matrix elements responsible for theω- effect

    the effective two-level operatorX α acting on the{|K S⟩,|K L⟩}sector. Confusing these three objects obscures the origin of the transition matrix elements responsible for theω- effect. 17 From the stress tensor to graviton-mode operators:The fundamental interaction is given in (71), (72), (73). After expanding the graviton field in Takagi supermodes, the o...

  4. [4]

    weak-interaction-induced flavour mixing, encoded in the transition coefficientsc ±

  5. [5]

    Neither ingredient alone is sufficient

    anomalous squeezed-graviton correlators⟨b αbα⟩. Neither ingredient alone is sufficient. A weakly mixed kaon system in a thermal gravitational bath gives no ω-effect because the anomalous correlators vanish. Conversely, a squeezed graviton bath coupled to a purely diagonal kaon operator (c ± = 0) cannot generate the required transitions between the antisym...

  6. [6]

    resonant matching, Ω ∗ ≃∆λ

  7. [7]

    large graviton occupation numberN eff

  8. [8]

    Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics (CosmoVerse)

    favourable overlap between the graviton spectrum and the antisymmetric–symmetric transition kernel. Astrophysical propagation effects:The mechanism described in this work is formally independent of the location of the squeezed graviton source. What enters the reduced meson dynamics is the graviton correlation function evaluated at the detector. In princip...

  9. [9]

    Free stress tensor and its diagonal structure We show how the effective two-level operatorXused in the main text arises from the underlying field- theoretic energy–momentum tensor. We begin with the flavour doublet Φ(x) = K0(x) ¯K0(x) ,(A2) whose free dynamics is described by L=∂ µΦ†∂µΦ−Φ †M2Φ.(A3) The associated Fock space is generated by creation operat...

  10. [10]

    The operatorT α acts on the full kaon Hilbert space

    Definition of the effective operatorX The graviton field couples universally to the energy–momentum tensor of the meson system, Sint = 1 2 Z d4x hµν(x)T µν(x).(A15) The graviton field is expanded in Takagi supermodes (58). The operatorT α acts on the full kaon Hilbert space. To obtain an effective description of neutral-kaon flavour dynamics, we restrict ...

  11. [11]

    Origin and form of off-diagonal terms As explained in Section III, off-diagonal components of the meson–graviton coupling arise because the physical eigenstatesK S andK L are weak-interaction mixtures of the flavour statesK 0 and ¯K0. When the stress tensor is projected onto the propagation-eigenstate basis, any operator that is off-diagonal in flavour sp...

  12. [12]

    Explicit calculation In the interaction picture with ∆λ=λ L −λ S = ∆mK − i 2∆ΓK, X(t) =x 01+x 3σ3 +x +e+i∆λtσ+ +x −e−i∆λtσ−.(A34) WritingX a =X(t a) with matrix entries (A a, Ba;C a, Da) in the (K S, KL) basis, a direct calculation gives C(K) AS (t1, t2) = 1 2 A1B2 −B 1A2 −C 1D2 +D 1C2 = 1 2 h (x0 +x 3)x+ e+i∆λt2 −e +i∆λt1 + (x0 −x 3)x− e−i∆λt1 −e −i∆λt2 ...

  13. [13]

    The linear term describes the ordinary graviton–axion coupling

    Quadratic graviton source from the axion action Expanding the axion actionS b =− 1 2 R d4x√−g[g αβ∂αb ∂βb+µ 2 bb2] to second order inh µν, with the axion evaluated on the classical cloudb cl(t,x)≃b 0Rnlm(r)Ylm(θ, ϕ) cos(ωbt−mϕ+δ), yieldsS b =S (0) b +S (1) b + S(2) b +· · ·. The linear term describes the ordinary graviton–axion coupling. The term quadrati...

  14. [14]

    The rotating wave approximation selects the resonant condition Ω1 + Ω2 ≃2ω b, corresponding to coherent annihilation of two axion quanta into a correlated graviton pair

    Squeezing kernel and resonance structure Expanding the graviton field in transverse-traceless modes and substituting into (B1) produces termsa † i a† j with coefficients Gij ∼ −iκ2 Z d4x√−¯gΠ(hi) µν (ˆki)u ki(x)J µνρσ(x) Π(hj) ρσ (ˆkj)u kj(x).(B3) Since the cloud oscillates asb cl ∼e −iωbt+e+iωbt, the quadratic source contains pieces∼e ±2iωbt. The rotatin...

  15. [15]

    N. E. Mavromatos, AIP Conf. Proc.796, 13 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0506294

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  16. [16]

    V. A. Kostelecky and R. Potting, Nucl. Phys. B359, 545 (1991)

    1991

  17. [17]

    L¨ uders, Kong

    G. L¨ uders, Kong. Dan. Vid. Sel. Mat. Fys. Med.28N5, 1 (1954)

    1954

  18. [18]

    Pauli, inNiels Bohr and the Development of Physics, edited by W

    W. Pauli, inNiels Bohr and the Development of Physics, edited by W. Pauli (Pergamon Press, London, 1955)

    1955

  19. [19]

    J. A. Wheeler and K. Ford,Geons, black holes, and quantum foam: A life in physics(1998)

    1998

  20. [20]

    E. P. Wigner,Group Thepry and Its Application to the Quantum Mechanics of Atomic Spectra(Academic Press, 1959)

    1959

  21. [21]

    R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D21, 2742 (1980)

    1980

  22. [22]

    J. R. Ellis, J. S. Hagelin, D. V. Nanopoulos, and M. A. Srednicki, Nucl. Phys. B241, 381 (1984)

    1984

  23. [23]

    Ambrosinoet al.(KLOE), Phys

    F. Ambrosinoet al.(KLOE), Phys. Lett. B642, 315 (2006), arXiv:hep-ex/0607027

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    Amelino-Cameliaet al., Eur

    G. Amelino-Cameliaet al., Eur. Phys. J. C68, 619 (2010), arXiv:1003.3868 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  25. [25]

    Bernab´ eu, N

    J. Bernab´ eu, N. E. Mavromatos, and J. Papavassiliou, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 131601 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0310180

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  26. [26]

    Bernab´ eu, N

    J. Bernab´ eu, N. E. Mavromatos, and S. Sarkar, Phys. Rev. D74, 045014 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0606137

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  27. [27]

    N. E. Mavromatos, Lect. Notes Phys.669, 245 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0407005

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  28. [28]

    Sarkar, J

    S. Sarkar, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.171, 012040 (2009), arXiv:0904.4556 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  29. [29]

    Babusciet al.(KLOE-2), J

    D. Babusciet al.(KLOE-2), J. High Energy Phys.2022, 059 (2022), arXiv:2111.04328

    arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Alvarez, J

    E. Alvarez, J. Bernabeu, N. E. Mavromatos, M. Nebot, and J. Papavassiliou, Phys. Lett. B607, 197 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0410409

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  31. [31]

    Alvarez, J

    E. Alvarez, J. Bernabeu, and M. Nebot, JHEP11, 087, arXiv:hep-ph/0605211

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Bernabeu, F

    J. Bernabeu, F. J. Botella, N. E. Mavromatos, and M. Nebot, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 865 (2017), arXiv:1612.05652 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [33]

    Shi and J

    Y. Shi and J. Yang, Phys. Rev. D98, 075019 (2018), arXiv:1612.07628 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Prasad (BESIII), Int

    V. Prasad (BESIII), Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39, 2443018 (2024), arXiv:2311.14279 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    J. R. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos, and D. V. Nanopoulos, Mod. Phys. Lett. A12, 1759 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9704169

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  36. [36]

    J. R. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos, and D. V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Rev. D62, 084019 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0006004

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  37. [37]

    J. R. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos, and M. Westmuckett, Phys. Rev. D70, 044036 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0405066

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  38. [38]

    N. E. Mavromatos, Found. Phys.40, 917 (2010), arXiv:0906.2712 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  39. [39]

    Polchinski,String theory

    J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string, Cambridge Monographs on Mathe- matical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  40. [40]

    Polchinski,String theory

    J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  41. [41]

    R. J. Szabo,An introduction to string theory and D-brane dynamics: With problems and solutions, 2nd edition (Imperial College Press, 2011)

    2011

  42. [42]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information(Cambridge University Press, 2012)

    2012

  43. [43]

    Dorlis, N

    P. Dorlis, N. E. Mavromatos, S. Sarkar, and S.-N. Vlachos, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 151501 (2025), arXiv:2507.01689 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Dorlis, N

    P. Dorlis, N. E. Mavromatos, S. Sarkar, and S.-N. Vlachos, Phys. Rev. D113, 026023 (2026), arXiv:2507.23475 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Houde, W

    M. Houde, W. McCutcheon, and N. Quesada, Can. J. Phys.102, 497 (2024), arXiv:2403.04596 [quant-ph]. 35

    arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Clifton, P

    T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, Phys. Rept.513, 1 (2012), arXiv:1106.2476 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  47. [47]

    Dorlis, N

    P. Dorlis, N. E. Mavromatos, S. Sarkar, and S.-N. Vlachos, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, in press, Awarded Third Prize in 2026 Gravity Research Foundation Essay Competition (2026), arXiv:2605.14797 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  48. [48]

    M. J. Jacquet, S. Weinfurtner, and F. K¨ onig, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A378, 20190239 (2020), arXiv:2005.04027 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    Barcel´ o, S

    C. Barcel´ o, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Living Reviews in Relativity14, 3 (2011), arXiv:gr-qc/0505065

    arXiv 2011

  50. [50]

    M. G. Genoni, M. G. A. Paris, and K. Banaszek, Physical Review A78, 060303 (2008), arXiv:0807.4582

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  51. [51]

    M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy,Quantum Optics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    1997

  52. [52]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A20, 69 (1974)

    1974

  53. [53]

    J. F. Donoghue, Phys. Rev. D50, 3874 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9405057

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  54. [54]

    Rovelli,Quantum Gravity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2004)

    C. Rovelli,Quantum Gravity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2004)

    2004

  55. [55]

    Percacci,An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety, 100 Years of General Rela- tivity, Vol

    R. Percacci,An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety, 100 Years of General Rela- tivity, Vol. 3 (World Scientific, 2017)

    2017

  56. [57]

    M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, Phys. Lett. B149, 117 (1984)

    1984

  57. [58]

    M. J. Duncan, N. Kaloper, and K. A. Olive, Nucl. Phys. B387, 215 (1992)

    1992

  58. [59]

    Jackiw and S

    R. Jackiw and S. Y. Pi, Phys. Rev. D68, 104012 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0308071

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  59. [60]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, J

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg,Atom-Photon Interactions: Basic Processes and Appli- cations(Wiley, New York, 1992)

    1992

  60. [61]

    Takagi, Jpn

    T. Takagi, Jpn. J. Math.1, 83 (1925)

    1925

  61. [62]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  62. [63]

    Lindblad, Commun

    G. Lindblad, Commun. Math. Phys.48, 119 (1976)

    1976

  63. [64]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, J. Math. Phys.17, 821 (1976)

    1976

  64. [65]

    Parikh, F

    M. Parikh, F. Wilczek, and G. Zahariade, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D29, 2042001 (2020), arXiv:2005.07211 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  65. [66]

    Parikh, F

    M. Parikh, F. Wilczek, and G. Zahariade, Phys. Rev. D104, 046021 (2021), arXiv:2010.08208 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  66. [67]

    Eichhorn, H

    A. Eichhorn, H. Gies, and D. Roscher, Phys. Rev. D86, 125014 (2012), arXiv:1208.0014 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  67. [68]

    Basilakos, N

    S. Basilakos, N. E. Mavromatos, and J. Sol` a Peracaula, Phys. Rev. D101, 045001 (2020), arXiv:1907.04890 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020