pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26596 · v1 · pith:7Z4OKF6Dnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Unified study of hyperon semileptonic decays in a relativistic three-quark model

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 04:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords hyperon semileptonic decaysrelativistic three-quark modelbaryon wave functionsweak form factorsoctet baryonsbranching fractionslattice QCD comparison
0
0 comments X

The pith

Wave functions fitted only to baryon masses yield all octet hyperon semileptonic decay rates and form factors with no extra parameters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that a relativistic three-quark model can determine the wave functions of all ground-state octet baryons by fitting a semirelativistic potential solely to the observed mass spectrum. These same wave functions then generate the complete set of vector and axial-vector form factors for every hyperon semileptonic decay channel without introducing any decay-specific parameters. The resulting branching fractions, lepton-flavor ratios, and leading form factors match existing data and lattice QCD values in the channels that have been measured. The calculation also isolates higher-order terms such as weak magnetism, revealing their channel dependence directly from the quark-level structure.

Core claim

In the relativistic three-quark model all baryon wave functions are fixed by a single fit of a semirelativistic potential to the baryon mass spectrum; the identical wave functions are then used to compute the full set of transition form factors for every octet hyperon semileptonic decay, producing branching fractions and ratios that agree with experiment and lattice QCD while separating weak magnetism, second-class currents, and PCAC pole contributions.

What carries the argument

Relativistic three-quark model wave functions obtained from semirelativistic potential fit to the baryon mass spectrum, which directly supply the overlap integrals for weak current matrix elements.

If this is right

  • Branching fractions for all octet hyperon semileptonic decays follow directly from the mass-fitted wave functions.
  • Lepton flavor universality ratios are obtained from the same wave functions for every channel.
  • The ratio g1/f1 in the Lambda to proton channel is fixed and matches recent experimental values.
  • The weak magnetism form factor f2 exhibits clear channel dependence that can be compared with lattice calculations.
  • The complete form factor set isolates second-class currents and PCAC pole terms for each transition.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Discrepancies in f2 for certain channels may indicate that transverse current contributions require components beyond pure valence quarks.
  • The same wave functions could be applied to predict semileptonic decays involving excited baryons once their masses are fitted.
  • Precision measurements of higher-order form factors would test whether the model's spatial and spin-flavor structure fully accounts for the observed weak currents.

Load-bearing premise

Wave functions determined only by fitting the mass spectrum are accurate for computing the weak transition amplitudes without further adjustment.

What would settle it

A statistically significant mismatch between the model's predicted f1(0) and g1(0) values and new high-precision lattice results or BESIII measurements across multiple independent channels would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

We present a unified theoretical study of semileptonic decays of ground-state octet hyperons using the relativistic three-quark model (R3QM). A key innovation of our approach is that all baryon wave functions are determined by fitting the baryon mass spectrum with a semirelativistic potential model, leading to predictions for weak transition amplitudes without free parameters. With the same wave functions, we calculate the branching fractions and lepton flavor universality ratios for the octet channels. The calculated values agree with the available experimental data and give predictions for channels with limited experimental information. We further compute the complete set of octet transition form factors without any additional free parameters, so that the weak current can be examined beyond the rate observables. In the well-measured $\Lambda \to p \ell^-\bar{\nu}_\ell$ channel, the calculated leading vector and axial-vector form factors, $f_1(0)$ and $g_1(0)$, agree well with recent lattice QCD results, and the $g_1/f_1$ ratio is consistent with recent BESIII measurements. Beyond the leading vector and axial-vector terms, the complete form factor set separates the weak magnetism, second class, and the pole contribution associated with the partially conserved axial current (PCAC) relation. The weak magnetism term $f_2$ shows the clearest channel dependence compared with lattice QCD results, and its smaller values in some channels may point to transverse current strength not fully saturated by pure $qqq$ valence components. This work provides a framework for connecting octet hyperon weak form factors to the spin--flavor and spatial structure of baryons at the quark level, and gives testable weak current observables for future hyperon semileptonic decay measurements.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a relativistic three-quark model (R3QM) in which all ground-state octet baryon wave functions are fixed by a single fit of a semirelativistic potential to the baryon mass spectrum. These wave functions are then used without further adjustment to compute the full set of weak transition form factors, branching fractions, and lepton-flavor-universality ratios for hyperon semileptonic decays. The paper reports that the leading form factors f1(0) and g1(0) in the well-measured Λ → p channel agree with recent lattice QCD results, that the g1/f1 ratio matches BESIII data, and that predictions are provided for channels with limited experimental information.

Significance. If the mass-spectrum fit sufficiently constrains the wave-function overlaps, the work supplies a parameter-free, unified quark-level description of octet hyperon weak decays that connects spatial and spin-flavor structure directly to observable form factors, including weak magnetism (f2) and second-class currents. The explicit separation of PCAC-related pole contributions and the channel-by-channel comparison with lattice results constitute a concrete strength of the approach.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (model and wave-function determination): the central claim that a single semirelativistic potential fit to the mass spectrum yields wave functions accurate enough for parameter-free weak matrix elements is load-bearing. The manuscript must demonstrate that variations of the potential parameters within the mass-fit uncertainties produce only small changes in the overlap integrals that determine f1(0), g1(0), and f2; without such a robustness check the uniqueness assumption remains untested.
  2. [§4] §4 (form-factor results): the text states that f1(0) and g1(0) “agree well” with lattice QCD, yet supplies neither the model’s numerical values with uncertainties nor a table comparing them directly to the lattice numbers. This omission prevents quantitative assessment of the claimed agreement and of the channel dependence reported for f2.
minor comments (2)
  1. The notation for the complete set of form factors (f1, f2, f3, g1, g2, g3) should be explicitly cross-referenced to the standard definitions used in lattice papers to facilitate direct comparison.
  2. Table captions listing branching fractions should include the experimental references against which the model predictions are compared.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below. Both points can be addressed by revisions that strengthen the presentation without altering the core results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: §2 (model and wave-function determination): the central claim that a single semirelativistic potential fit to the mass spectrum yields wave functions accurate enough for parameter-free weak matrix elements is load-bearing. The manuscript must demonstrate that variations of the potential parameters within the mass-fit uncertainties produce only small changes in the overlap integrals that determine f1(0), g1(0), and f2; without such a robustness check the uniqueness assumption remains untested.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit robustness check would strengthen the central claim. Although the semirelativistic potential is fixed by a single fit to the baryon mass spectrum, we will add in the revised manuscript a sensitivity analysis in which the potential parameters are varied within the uncertainties obtained from that fit. The resulting variations in the overlap integrals for f1(0), g1(0), and f2 will be quantified and tabulated for the principal channels, thereby testing the stability of the predicted form factors. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §4 (form-factor results): the text states that f1(0) and g1(0) “agree well” with lattice QCD, yet supplies neither the model’s numerical values with uncertainties nor a table comparing them directly to the lattice numbers. This omission prevents quantitative assessment of the claimed agreement and of the channel dependence reported for f2.

    Authors: We accept that the absence of explicit numerical values and a direct comparison table limits quantitative evaluation. In the revised version we will insert a new table that reports the model predictions for f1(0), g1(0), f2(0) and the remaining form factors (with uncertainties estimated from the parameter variations described in the response to §2) together with the corresponding lattice-QCD results for every channel where lattice data exist. This will also make the reported channel dependence of f2 directly visible. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; wave functions from mass fit yield independent form-factor predictions

full rationale

The paper fits a semirelativistic potential to the baryon mass spectrum to fix the three-quark wave functions, then computes weak transition form factors and rates from those wave functions. This constitutes a standard model prediction for a distinct class of observables (current matrix elements) rather than a reduction by construction to the input data. Results are explicitly compared to external lattice QCD values and BESIII measurements, satisfying the criterion for independent support. No quoted equations, self-citations, or ansatze in the provided text reduce the claimed predictions to the mass fit itself or import uniqueness from prior author work. The central claim therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the transferability of wave functions fitted to the mass spectrum into the weak-decay sector and on the assumption that the R3QM captures the necessary dynamics for both observables.

free parameters (1)
  • semirelativistic potential parameters
    Fitted to the baryon mass spectrum to determine the wave functions subsequently used for weak transitions
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The relativistic three-quark model with semirelativistic potential accurately describes the ground-state octet baryons
    Invoked to justify determining wave functions from mass fits and applying them unchanged to weak decays

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5861 in / 1517 out tokens · 52914 ms · 2026-06-26T04:46:28.387820+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Gaillard and G

    J.M. Gaillard and G. Sauvage,HYPERON BETA DECAYS,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.34(1984) 351

  2. [2]

    Garcia and P

    A. Garcia and P. Kielanowski,THE BETA DECAY OF HYPERONS, vol. 222 ofLect. Notes Phys., Springer (1985), 10.1007/3-540-15184-2. – 33 – -0.2 -0.1 0.00 0.1 -0.70 -0.64 -0.58 -0.52 f1(q2) Σ0 → p ℓ − ̄νℓ q2 max -0.2 -0.1 0.00 0.1 0.46 0.50 0.54 0.58 f2(q2) Σ0 → p ℓ − ̄νℓ q2 max -0.2 -0.1 0.00 0.1 0.008 0.012 0.016 0.020 f3(q2) Σ0 → p ℓ − ̄νℓ q2 max -0.2 -0.1 0...

  3. [3]

    Cabibbo, E.C

    N. Cabibbo, E.C. Swallow and R. Winston,Semileptonic hyperon decays,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 53(2003) 39 [hep-ph/0307298]

  4. [4]

    Mateu and A

    V . Mateu and A. Pich,V us determination from hyperon semileptonic decays,JHEP10(2005) 041 [hep-ph/0509045]

  5. [5]

    Donoghue, B.R

    J.F. Donoghue, B.R. Holstein and S.W. Klimt,K M Angles and SU(3) Breaking in Hyperon Beta Decay,Phys. Rev. D35(1987) 934

  6. [6]

    Flores-Mendieta, E.E

    R. Flores-Mendieta, E.E. Jenkins and A.V . Manohar,SU(3) symmetry breaking in hyperon semileptonic decays,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 094028 [hep-ph/9805416]

  7. [7]

    Flores-Mendieta,V(us) from hyperon semileptonic decays,Phys

    R. Flores-Mendieta,V(us) from hyperon semileptonic decays,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 114036 [hep-ph/0410171]

  8. [8]

    Ratcliffe, SU(3)breaking in hyperon beta decays: A prediction forΞ 0 →Σ +e−¯νe,Nucl

    P.G. Ratcliffe, SU(3)breaking in hyperon beta decays: A prediction forΞ 0 →Σ +e−¯νe,Nucl. Phys. B – 34 – -0.1 -0.05 0.00 0.05 -1.3 -1.2 -1.1 -1.0 f1(q2) Ξ − → Λ ℓ − ̄νℓ q2 max -0.1 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28 f2(q2) Ξ − → Λ ℓ − ̄νℓ q2 max -0.1 -0.05 0.00 0.05 -0.05 -0.04 -0.03 -0.02 f3(q2) Ξ − → Λ ℓ − ̄νℓ q2 max -0.1 -0.05 0.00 0.05 q2 [GeV2] -0.3...

  9. [9]

    Cabibbo, E.C

    N. Cabibbo, E.C. Swallow and R. Winston,Semileptonic hyperon decays and CKM unitarity,Phys. Rev. Lett.92(2004) 251803 [hep-ph/0307214]. – 35 –

  10. [10]

    Pham,Test of SU(3) Symmetry in Hyperon Semileptonic Decays,Phys

    T.N. Pham,Test of SU(3) Symmetry in Hyperon Semileptonic Decays,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 016002 [1210.3981]

  11. [11]

    Wang, M.-Z

    R.-M. Wang, M.-Z. Yang, H.-B. Li and X.-D. Cheng,Testing SU(3) Flavor Symmetry in Semileptonic and Two-body Nonleptonic Decays of Hyperons,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 076008 [1906.08413]

  12. [12]

    Bijnens, H

    J. Bijnens, H. Sonoda and M.B. Wise,On the Validity of Chiral Perturbation Theory for Weak Hyperon Decays,Nucl. Phys. B261(1985) 185

  13. [13]

    Krause,Baryon Matrix Elements of the Vector Current in Chiral Perturbation Theory,Helv

    A. Krause,Baryon Matrix Elements of the Vector Current in Chiral Perturbation Theory,Helv. Phys. Acta63(1990) 3

  14. [14]

    Anderson and M.A

    J. Anderson and M.A. Luty,Chiral corrections to hyperon vector form-factors,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 4975 [hep-ph/9301219]

  15. [15]

    Villadoro,Chiral corrections to the hyperon vector form factors,Phys

    G. Villadoro,Chiral corrections to the hyperon vector form factors,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 014018 [hep-ph/0603226]

  16. [16]

    Lacour, B

    A. Lacour, B. Kubis and U.-G. Meissner,Hyperon decay form factors in chiral perturbation theory, JHEP10(2007) 083 [0708.3957]

  17. [17]

    L.S. Geng, J. Martin Camalich and M.J. Vicente Vacas, SU(3)-breaking corrections to the hyperon vector coupling f1(0)in covariant baryon chiral perturbation theory,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 094022 [0903.4869]

  18. [18]

    Luty and M.J

    M.A. Luty and M.J. White,Decouplet contributions to hyperon axial vector form-factors,Phys. Lett. B319(1993) 261 [hep-ph/9305203]

  19. [19]

    Jiang and B.C

    F.-J. Jiang and B.C. Tiburzi,Chiral corrections to hyperon axial form factors,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 094506 [0801.2535]

  20. [20]

    Jiang and B.C

    F.-J. Jiang and B.C. Tiburzi,Hyperon Axial Charges in Two-Flavor Chiral Perturbation Theory,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 077501 [0905.0857]

  21. [21]

    Ledwig, J

    T. Ledwig, J. Martin Camalich, L.S. Geng and M.J. Vicente Vacas,Octet-baryon axial-vector charges and SU(3)-breaking effects in the semileptonic hyperon decays,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 054502 [1405.5456]

  22. [22]

    Sauerwein, M.F.M

    U. Sauerwein, M.F.M. Lutz and R.G.E. Timmermans,Axial-vector form factors of the baryon octet and chiral symmetry,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 054005 [2105.06755]

  23. [23]

    Guadagnoli, G

    D. Guadagnoli, G. Martinelli, M. Papinutto and S. Simula,Semileptonic hyperon decays on the Lattice: An Exploratory study,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.140(2005) 390 [hep-lat/0409048]

  24. [24]

    Becirevic, D

    D. Becirevic, D. Guadagnoli, G. Isidori, V . Lubicz, G. Martinelli, F. Mescia et al.,SU(3)-breaking effects in kaon and hyperon semileptonic decays from lattice QCD,Eur. Phys. J. A24S1(2005) 69 [hep-lat/0411016]

  25. [25]

    Guadagnoli, V

    D. Guadagnoli, V . Lubicz, M. Papinutto and S. Simula,First Lattice QCD Study of theΣ→n Axial and Vector Form Factors withSU(3)Breaking Corrections,Nucl. Phys. B761(2007) 63 [hep-ph/0606181]

  26. [26]

    Sasaki and T

    S. Sasaki and T. Yamazaki,SU(3) breaking effects in hyperon beta decay from lattice QCD,PoS LAT2006(2006) 092 [hep-lat/0610082]

  27. [27]

    Sasaki and T

    S. Sasaki and T. Yamazaki,Lattice study of flavor SU(3) breaking in hyperon beta decay,Phys. Rev. D 79(2009) 074508 [0811.1406]

  28. [28]

    Sasaki,Hyperon vector coupling f 1(0)from 2+1 flavor lattice QCD,AIP Conf

    S. Sasaki,Hyperon vector coupling f 1(0)from 2+1 flavor lattice QCD,AIP Conf. Proc.1388(2011) 443 [1102.4934]. – 36 –

  29. [29]

    Sasaki,Hyperon vector form factor from 2+1 flavor lattice QCD,Phys

    S. Sasaki,Hyperon vector form factor from 2+1 flavor lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 114502 [1209.6115]

  30. [30]

    Shanahan, A.N

    P.E. Shanahan, A.N. Cooke, R. Horsley, Y . Nakamura, P.E.L. Rakow, G. Schierholz et al.,SU(3) breaking in hyperon transition vector form factors,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 074029 [1508.06923]

  31. [31]

    Sasaki,Continuum limit of hyperon vector coupling f1(0)from 2+1 flavor domain wall QCD,Phys

    S. Sasaki,Continuum limit of hyperon vector coupling f1(0)from 2+1 flavor domain wall QCD,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 074509 [1708.04008]

  32. [32]

    Bacchio and A

    S. Bacchio and A. Konstantinou,Study of theΛ→pℓν¯ℓSemileptonic Decay in Lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 231901 [2507.09970]

  33. [33]

    Alexandrou, S

    C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, A. Konstantinou and E. Vakana,Scalar and tensor form factors for Λ→pℓ¯ν ℓ from lattice QCD,2604.16025

  34. [34]

    Wang,Analysis of the Sigma-n form factors with light-cone QCD sum rules,J

    Z.G. Wang,Analysis of the Sigma-n form factors with light-cone QCD sum rules,J. Phys. G34(2007) 493 [hep-ph/0609155]

  35. [35]

    Zhang, X.-H

    S.-Q. Zhang, X.-H. Zhang and C.-F. Qiao,Hyperon semileptonic decays in QCD sum rules,JHEP06 (2024) 122 [2402.15088]

  36. [36]

    Ahmadi, Z.R

    M. Ahmadi, Z.R. Najjar and K. Azizi,Study of the semileptonic decayΛ→pℓν¯ℓin QCD,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 094035 [2509.23421]

  37. [37]

    Donoghue and B.R

    J.F. Donoghue and B.R. Holstein,Quark Model Calculation of the Weak Electric Coupling in Semileptonic Baryon Decay,Phys. Rev. D25(1982) 206

  38. [38]

    Barik, B.K

    N. Barik, B.K. Dash and M. Das,WEAK ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FORM-FACTORS FOR SEMILEPTONIC BARYON DECAYS IN AN INDEPENDENT QUARK MODEL,Phys. Rev. D32 (1985) 1725

  39. [39]

    Beyer and S.K

    M. Beyer and S.K. Singh,Quark Model Analysis of Hyperon Semileptonic Decays,Z. Phys. C31 (1986) 421

  40. [40]

    Rath and S.N

    D.P. Rath and S.N. Jena,A QUARK MODEL STUDY OF SEMILEPTONIC BARYON DECAYS IN THE ELECTRONIC DECAY MODES,Pramana32(1989) 753

  41. [41]

    Jena and S

    S.N. Jena and S. Panda,Weak electric and magnetic form-factors for semileptonic baryon decays in a relativistic quark model,Pramana37(1991) 47

  42. [42]

    Schlumpf,Beta decay of hyperons in a relativistic quark model,Phys

    F. Schlumpf,Beta decay of hyperons in a relativistic quark model,Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 2262 [hep-ph/9409272]

  43. [43]

    Ohlsson and H

    T. Ohlsson and H. Snellman,Weak form-factors for semileptonic octet baryon decays in the chiral quark model,Eur. Phys. J. C6(1999) 285 [hep-ph/9803490]

  44. [44]

    H.-C. Kim, M. Praszalowicz and K. Goeke,Hyperon semileptonic decays and quark spin content of the proton,Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 114006 [hep-ph/9910282]

  45. [45]

    Ledwig, A

    T. Ledwig, A. Silva, H.-C. Kim and K. Goeke,Semileptonic hyperon decays in the self-consistent SU(3) chiral quark-soliton model,JHEP07(2008) 132 [0806.4072]

  46. [46]

    Sharma, H

    N. Sharma, H. Dahiya, P.K. Chatley and M. Gupta,Weak vector and axial-vector form factors in the chiral constituent quark model with configuration mixing,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 077503 [0904.2246]

  47. [47]

    Dahiya, A

    H. Dahiya, A. Girdhar and M. Randhawa,Study of vector and axial-vector form factors and the decay parameters for the semileptonic hyperon decays,Indian J. Phys.98(2024) 4961 [2405.00444]. – 37 –

  48. [48]

    Faessler, T

    A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, B.R. Holstein, M.A. Ivanov, J.G. Korner and V .E. Lyubovitskij,Semileptonic decays of the light J P =1/2 + ground state baryon octet,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 094005 [0809.4159]

  49. [49]

    Ramalho and K

    G. Ramalho and K. Tsushima,Axial form factors of the octet baryons in a covariant quark model, Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 014001 [1512.01167]

  50. [50]

    Bristol-Genev a-Heidelberg-Orsay-Rutherford-Strasbourgcollaboration,Measurements of Hyperon Semileptonic Decays at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron. 1. TheΣ − →Λe −¯νDecay Mode,Z. Phys. C12(1982) 307

  51. [51]

    Bristol-Genev a-Heidelberg-Orsay-Rutherford-Strasbourgcollaboration,Measurements of Hyperon Semileptonic Decays at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron. 2. TheΛ→pe¯ν,Ξ − →Λe¯ν, and Ξ− →Σ 0e¯νDecay Modes,Z. Phys. C21(1983) 1

  52. [52]

    Bristol-Genev a-Heidelberg-Orsay-Rutherford-Strasbourgcollaboration,Measurements of Hyperon Semileptonic Decays at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron. 3. TheΣ − →ne − Anti-neutrino Decay Mode,Z. Phys. C21(1983) 17

  53. [53]

    Bourquin et al.,Measurements of Hyperon Semileptonic Decays at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron

    M. Bourquin et al.,Measurements of Hyperon Semileptonic Decays at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron. 4. Tests of the Cabibbo Model,Z. Phys. C21(1983) 27

  54. [54]

    Wise, D.A

    J. Wise, D.A. Jensen, M.N. Kreisler, F. Lomanno, R. Poster, M.S.Z. Rabin et al.,Precise Measurement of the Ratio of the Axial Vector Coupling to Vector Coupling inΛ0 →pe −¯ν,Phys. Lett. B98(1981) 123

  55. [55]

    Dworkin et al.,High statistics measurement of g A/gV inΛ→pe −¯νe,Phys

    J. Dworkin et al.,High statistics measurement of g A/gV inΛ→pe −¯νe,Phys. Rev. D41(1990) 780

  56. [56]

    Hsueh et al.,A High Precision Measurement of PolarizedΣ− Beta Decay,Phys

    S.Y . Hsueh et al.,A High Precision Measurement of PolarizedΣ− Beta Decay,Phys. Rev. D38(1988) 2056

  57. [57]

    KTeV E832/E799 collaboration,Observation of the DecayΞ 0 →Σ +e− ¯νe,Phys. Rev. Lett.82(1999) 3751

  58. [58]

    KTeV collaboration,First Measurement of Form-Factors of the DecayΞ 0 → Σ+e−¯νe,Phys. Rev. Lett. 87(2001) 132001 [hep-ex/0105016]

  59. [59]

    NA48/I collaboration,Measurement of the branching ratios of the decaysΞ 0 →Σ +e−¯νe and ¯Ξ0 → ¯Σ+e+νe,Phys. Lett. B645(2007) 36 [hep-ex/0612043]

  60. [60]

    NA48/1 collaboration,Measurement of the branching ratio of the decayΞ 0 → Σ+µ−¯νµ,Phys. Lett. B 720(2013) 105 [1212.3131]

  61. [61]

    BESIII collaboration,First Measurement of the Absolute Branching Fraction ofΛ→pµ −¯νµ,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 121802 [2107.06704]

  62. [62]

    LHCbcollaboration,Branching fraction measurement of theΛ →pµ −¯νµ decay,JHEP04(2026) 096 [2511.15681]

  63. [63]

    BESIII collaboration,Determination of CKM matrix element and axial vector form factors from weak decays of quantum-entangled strange baryons,2509.09266

  64. [64]

    ParticleDataGroupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

  65. [65]

    Wu and B.-S

    J.-J. Wu and B.-S. Zou,Hyperon Production from Neutrino–Nucleon Reaction,Few Body Syst.56 (2015) 165 [1307.0574]

  66. [66]

    G ¨ursey, A

    F. G ¨ursey, A. Pais and L.A. Radicati,Spin and Unitary Spin Independence of Strong Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 299. – 38 –

  67. [67]

    Isgur and G

    N. Isgur and G. Karl,P Wave Baryons in the Quark Model,Phys. Rev. D18(1978) 4187

  68. [68]

    Capstick and N

    S. Capstick and N. Isgur,Baryons in a Relativized Quark Model with Chromodynamics,Phys. Rev. D 34(1986) 2809

  69. [69]

    Godfrey and N

    S. Godfrey and N. Isgur,Mesons in a Relativized Quark Model with Chromodynamics,Phys. Rev. D 32(1985) 189

  70. [70]

    Zhong, M.-S

    H.-H. Zhong, M.-S. Liu, R.-H. Ni, M.-Y . Liu, L.-Y . Xiao and X.-H. Zhong,Unified study of nucleon and∆baryon spectra and their strong decays with chiral dynamics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 116034 [2409.07998]

  71. [71]

    Eichten, K

    E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, K.D. Lane and T.-M. Yan,Charmonium: The Model,Phys. Rev. D17(1978) 3090

  72. [72]

    Huang, P.N

    F. Huang, P.N. Shen, Y .B. Dong and Z.Y . Zhang,Understanding the structure of d∗(2380)in chiral quark model,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.59(2016) 622002 [1505.05395]

  73. [73]

    Silvestre-Brac,Spectrum and static properties of heavy baryons,Few Body Syst.20(1996) 1

    B. Silvestre-Brac,Spectrum and static properties of heavy baryons,Few Body Syst.20(1996) 1

  74. [74]

    Bakamjian and L.H

    B. Bakamjian and L.H. Thomas,Relativistic particle dynamics. 2,Phys. Rev.92(1953) 1300

  75. [75]

    Faustov,Relativistic wave function and form-factors of the bound system,Annals Phys.78 (1973) 176

    R.N. Faustov,Relativistic wave function and form-factors of the bound system,Annals Phys.78 (1973) 176

  76. [76]

    Ping, H.C

    R.G. Ping, H.C. Chiang and B.S. Zou,Study of the structure of baryons from J/ψ→B ¯B decays in the quark model,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 054020

  77. [77]

    Ping, H.C

    R.G. Ping, H.C. Chiang and B.S. Zou,A Study of the Roper resonance as a hybrid state from J/ψ decays,Nucl. Phys. A743(2004) 149 [nucl-th/0408007]

  78. [78]

    Ping, B.S

    R.G. Ping, B.S. Zou and H.C. Chiang,P-wave charmonium decays into baryon and antibaryon pairs in quark pair creation model,Eur. Phys. J. A23(2004) 129

  79. [79]

    Wigner,On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group,Ann

    E.P. Wigner,On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group,Ann. Math.40(1939) 149

  80. [80]

    Faustov,Magnetic moment of the relativistic composite system,Nuovo Cim

    R. Faustov,Magnetic moment of the relativistic composite system,Nuovo Cim. A69(1970) 37

Showing first 80 references.