pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26882 · v1 · pith:ZSSASSYInew · submitted 2026-06-25 · 🪐 quant-ph

Shallow Quantum Circuits for Deep Chemistry via Valence Bond Embeddings

Francisco Javier del Arco Santos , Jakob S. Kottmann This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 04:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum chemistryvalence bond theoryvariational quantum eigensolverquantum circuitsfermionic-bosonic encodingsmolecular ground statesshallow circuitsactive space
0
0 comments X

The pith

Valence bond embeddings with hybrid encodings produce shallow circuits for full-molecule variational quantum chemistry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors combine quantum valence bond theory with hybrid fermionic-bosonic encodings to construct a single variational circuit that represents the entire molecular system instead of an active-space subset. This circuit is optimized variationally to approximate the ground-state energy of larger molecules than those reachable by conventional active-space methods. A reader would care because current hardware limits force most quantum chemistry calculations into small orbital subspaces, and a consistent full-system circuit removes that restriction while still delivering energies close to exact results.

Core claim

Embedding the molecular electronic structure in a structured valence-bond basis and mapping it through a hybrid fermionic-bosonic encoding yields a shallow, hardware-executable circuit whose variational minimum recovers ground-state energies that match or exceed the accuracy of active-space restricted circuits on the same hardware budget.

What carries the argument

Structured valence bond embedding combined with hybrid Fermionic-Bosonic encodings, which directly maps the full molecular Hamiltonian into a variational ansatz circuit without active-space truncation.

If this is right

  • VQE calculations become possible on molecular sizes previously excluded by active-space size limits.
  • The circuits supply initial states for projective algorithms such as quantum phase estimation on the complete system.
  • Dynamical observables can be computed directly from the full Hamiltonian using the same circuit family.
  • Ground-state approximations remain accurate relative to exact solutions across the tested chemically relevant molecules.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same embedding structure could be reused for time-dependent simulations if the valence-bond basis preserves the required time-evolution symmetries.
  • Extending the method to larger basis sets might reduce reliance on separate basis-set extrapolation procedures.
  • The circuit construction could be paired with existing error-mitigation techniques to improve results on current noisy devices without changing the core ansatz.

Load-bearing premise

The variational minimum reached by the circuit remains close to the exact ground-state energy when the full molecular system is encoded without active-space cuts or extra error-mitigation steps.

What would settle it

Optimizing the circuit on a molecule such as water in a double-zeta basis and finding that the final energy lies more than 1.6 millihartree above the exact full-configuration-interaction value.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26882 by Francisco Javier del Arco Santos, Jakob S. Kottmann.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the valence bond embedding on the example of a benzene molecule. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: SPA+ circuit design employed in this work. The illustration is for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Butadiene sto-3g carbon dihedral rotational energies, while keeping all other atoms’ relative positions static. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: 4a 2-Ethyl-N,N-diisopropylbenzamide geometrical structures. 4b Resonant structures (graphs) considered in the SPA+. C. Usecase Table IV. Benzamide rotation barrier in kcal/mol. SPA con￾tains only the main graph (central structure on 4b). SPA+1 adds the graph with the positive charge on the Nitrogen (right). SPA+2 adds positive charge delocalization on the benzene ring (left). SPA+12 combines all three stru… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum chemistry is one of the major potential applications in quantum computation. Currently there is a considerable focus on relatively small active spaces as a consequence of hardware noise and exponential bottlenecks in simulations. In the long run, there will be an increasing demand in reliable approximations for larger systems -- both, as initial states for projective algorithms like the quantum phase estimation or for the evaluation of dynamical properties. While numerous approaches to select active spaces and extrapolate basis set accuracy exist, there is currently no consistent approach that results in a single quantum circuit for the total system. In this work, we combine hybrid Fermionic-Bosonic encodings with the structured approach of Quantum Valence Bond Theory to directly construct quantum circuits for comparably large molecular systems. With this approach we are able to push simulability barrier of variational quantum eigensolvers towards chemically relevant systems and demonstrate circuit designs that outperform active space counterparts and achieve good approximations with respect to the exact solutions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes combining hybrid Fermionic-Bosonic encodings with the structured valence-bond approach of Quantum Valence Bond Theory to construct shallow quantum circuits for variational quantum eigensolvers on molecular systems. It claims this enables direct treatment of the total system (without active-space restrictions), pushes the simulability barrier for VQE toward chemically relevant molecules, and yields circuits that outperform active-space counterparts while achieving good agreement with exact solutions.

Significance. If the central construction is shown to produce variational minima close to the exact ground state of the full molecular Hamiltonian, the work would provide a systematic route to single-circuit ansatze for larger systems, which could serve as useful initial states for projective methods and extend practical VQE applicability.

major comments (2)
  1. [Valence-bond embedding and hybrid encoding sections] The stress-test concern lands: Quantum Valence Bond Theory relies on a structured selection of valence configurations and bond embeddings. Unless the manuscript proves (e.g., via explicit span argument or amplitude bounds) that the resulting ansatz covers the full configuration space of the molecular Hamiltonian or that omitted sectors have rigorously zero weight, the variational minimum is guaranteed only for the embedded subspace. This directly undermines the claim of operating on the 'total system' without effective truncation equivalent to an active-space restriction. The relevant discussion appears in the sections describing the valence-bond embedding and the hybrid encoding construction.
  2. [Results and numerical validation sections] The abstract states that the circuits 'achieve good approximations with respect to the exact solutions' and 'outperform active space counterparts,' yet the provided text contains no numerical benchmarks, circuit diagrams, or derivation steps. If the full manuscript likewise lacks concrete energy errors, circuit depths, or comparisons on specific molecules (e.g., against FCI or active-space VQE), the performance claims cannot be assessed and the central assertion remains unverified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] Clarify the precise definition of 'total system' versus the embedded model in the introduction and methods; the current phrasing risks conflating the two.
  2. [Methods] Add explicit statements on the number of free parameters retained after the valence-bond embedding; the abstract asserts a 'consistent approach' but does not address whether any implicit fitting remains.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. We address each major comment below and commit to revisions that clarify the scope of the ansatz and substantiate the performance claims with explicit data.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Valence-bond embedding and hybrid encoding sections] The stress-test concern lands: Quantum Valence Bond Theory relies on a structured selection of valence configurations and bond embeddings. Unless the manuscript proves (e.g., via explicit span argument or amplitude bounds) that the resulting ansatz covers the full configuration space of the molecular Hamiltonian or that omitted sectors have rigorously zero weight, the variational minimum is guaranteed only for the embedded subspace. This directly undermines the claim of operating on the 'total system' without effective truncation equivalent to an active-space restriction.

    Authors: We agree that the ansatz is defined within the valence-bond embedded subspace and that the manuscript provides no explicit span argument or amplitude bounds showing that omitted sectors have zero weight. The variational minimum is therefore guaranteed only within this subspace. We will revise the valence-bond embedding and hybrid encoding sections to remove any implication of unrestricted full-system treatment and instead describe the approach as a structured subspace approximation designed to capture dominant correlations, with explicit discussion of its relation to active-space restrictions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results and numerical validation sections] The abstract states that the circuits 'achieve good approximations with respect to the exact solutions' and 'outperform active space counterparts,' yet the provided text contains no numerical benchmarks, circuit diagrams, or derivation steps. If the full manuscript likewise lacks concrete energy errors, circuit depths, or comparisons on specific molecules (e.g., against FCI or active-space VQE), the performance claims cannot be assessed and the central assertion remains unverified.

    Authors: The referee is correct: if the reviewed manuscript lacks numerical benchmarks, the abstract claims cannot be assessed. We will add a dedicated results section containing explicit energy errors relative to exact (FCI) solutions, circuit depths, and direct comparisons against active-space VQE on specific molecules to verify the stated performance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation self-contained from external encodings and valence-bond theory

full rationale

The provided abstract and text describe combining hybrid Fermionic-Bosonic encodings with Quantum Valence Bond Theory to build circuits for larger systems. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce any claimed prediction or uniqueness result to the inputs by construction. The performance claims are presented as outcomes of the circuit construction rather than tautological redefinitions or renamings of known patterns. This is the normal case of a method paper whose central ansatz draws on prior independent literature without load-bearing self-reference.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all ledger entries are therefore empty.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5687 in / 1095 out tokens · 34067 ms · 2026-06-26T04:51:58.626930+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Build hybrid atomic orbitals (HAO) in sp, sp2, or sp3 hybridization and assign them to the vertices of the chemical graph

  2. [2]

    Align the orbitals with the direction of the bonds (edges)

  3. [3]

    Combine hybrid orbitals from connected vertices into bonding and anti-bonding types

  4. [4]

    Chemistry Localized Property-optimized Orbitals

    Use this orbitals as initial guess in an orbital op- timizer For pure hydrogenic systems, this strategy can be im- plemented relatively straightforward (see for example [40]). For heterogenic molecules the manual prepara- tion of the initial guess is however tedious, which is why we resort to “Chemistry Localized Property-optimized Orbitals” (CLPO) [41] a...

  5. [5]

    Con- struct a Lewis graph Based on the CLPO struc- ture 6

    Initialize the CLPO through the blossom algo- rithm referenced in the previous section. Con- struct a Lewis graph Based on the CLPO struc- ture 6

  6. [6]

    (alternative) Select a Lewis graph for the molecule and manually configure the initial orbitals to re- semble the graph structure

  7. [7]

    Assign all CLPO to vertices in the graph

    Decompose the graph into subgraphsC k ∈ G and select a representation (hardcore bosonic or fermionic). Assign all CLPO to vertices in the graph

  8. [8]

    Assemble SPA circuits for all hardcore bosonic parts

  9. [9]

    Assemble VQE circuit for the Fermionic parts

  10. [10]

    Compile the objective function (5) that represents the expectation value

  11. [11]

    Execute the VQE optimization (either classically, on quantum hardware, or mixed)

  12. [12]

    F/B R-DMRG

    Optimize the molecular orbitals In this work we chose a multigraph schema, as illus- trated in Fig. 2 for the fermionic VQE parts in step 4. In the default construction illustrated above, all bosonic subspaces are classically simulable the underlying SPA circuit structure that restricts each bosonic subspace to a single quasi-particle. This limitation can...

  13. [13]

    A better spatial description of the wave function is required, usually addressed by increasing the basis set

    Increasing the accuracy of the basis For most of the real-world relevant applications, a minimal basis such as STO-3G doesn’t provide accurate results. A better spatial description of the wave function is required, usually addressed by increasing the basis set. In quantum computational methods, this will lead to increased qubit requirements as well as res...

  14. [14]

    A.Aspuru-Guzik, A.D.Dutoi, P.J.Love,andM.Head- Gordon, Science309, 1704 (2005)

    2005

  15. [15]

    P. J. Ollitrault, C. L. Cortes, J. F. Gonthier, R. M. Par- rish, D. Rocca, G.-L. Anselmetti, M. Degroote, N. Moll, R. Santagati, and M. Streif, Physical Review Letters 133, 250601 (2024)

    2024

  16. [16]

    Fomichev, K

    S. Fomichev, K. Hejazi, M. S. Zini, M. Kiser, J. Frax- anet, P.A.M.Casares, A.Delgado, J.Huh, A.-C.Voigt, J. E. Mueller, and J. M. Arrazola, PRX Quantum5, 040339 (2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    J. Lee, W. J. Huggins, M. Head-Gordon, and K. B. Whaley, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 15, 311 (2018)

    2018

  18. [18]

    H. R. Grimsley, S. E. Economou, E. Barnes, and N. J. Mayhall, Nature Communications10, 1 (2019)

    2019

  19. [19]

    H. G. A. Burton, D. Marti-Dafcik, D. P. Tew, and D. J. Wales, npj Quantum Information9, 75 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    H. G. A. Burton, Physical Review Research6, 023300 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    J. S. Kottmann and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Physical Re- view A105, 032449 (2022), arxiv:2105.03836 [physics, physics:quant-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Ramôa, P

    M. Ramôa, P. G. Anastasiou, L. P. Santos, N. J. May- hall, E. Barnes, and S. E. Economou, npj Quantum Information11, 86 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    C. J. Stein and M. Reiher, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation12, 1760 (2016)

    2016

  24. [24]

    L. Ding, S. Knecht, and C. Schilling, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters14, 11022 (2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    Tarocco, P

    F. Tarocco, P. A. B. Haase, F. Pavošević, V. Kr- ishna, L. Guidoni, S. Knecht, and M. Stella, AEGISS – Atomic orbital and Entropy-based Guided Inference for Space Selection – A novel semi-automated active space selection workflow for quantum chemistry and quan- tum computing applications (2025), arXiv:2508.10671 [physics]

    arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    R. G. Shirazi, A. Zech, P. Pinski, and V. V. Ry- bkin, Performance of Automatic Active Space Se- lection for Electronic Excitation Energies (2025), arXiv:2511.05732 [physics.chem-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    J. J. Bao and D. G. Truhlar, Journal of Chemical The- ory and Computation15, 5308 (2019)

    2019

  28. [28]

    F. J. de Arco Santos and J. S. Kottman, Quantum Science and Technology 10.1088/2058-9565/adbdee (2025)

    work page doi:10.1088/2058-9565/adbdee 2058

  29. [30]

    J. S. Kottmann and F. Scala, Journal of Chemical The- ory and Computation20, 3514 (2024)

    2024

  30. [31]

    J. S. Kottmann, P. Schleich, T. Tamayo-Mendoza, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters12, 663 (2021)

    2021

  31. [32]

    Vaish and B

    P. Vaish and B. Rubenstein, Reducing the Cost of Unitary Coupled Cluster via Active Space Partitioning (2026), arXiv:2602.04783 [physics]

    arXiv 2026

  32. [33]

    M. F. Lange and T. C. Berkelbach, Molecular physics 118, e1808726 (2020)

    2020

  33. [34]

    Otten, M

    M. Otten, M. R. Hermes, R. Pandharkar, Y. Alexeev, S. K. Gray, and L. Gagliardi, Journal of Chemical The- ory and Computation18, 7205 (2022)

    2022

  34. [35]

    Q. Wang, R. D’Cunha, A. Mitra, S. K. Gray, M. Otten, and L. Gagliardi, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 129, 7999 (2025)

    2025

  35. [36]

    Yoshikawa, T

    T. Yoshikawa, T. Takanashi, and H. Nakai, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation18, 5360 (2022). 11

    2022

  36. [37]

    Zhang, L

    Y. Zhang, L. Cincio, C. F. A. Negre, P. Czarnik, P. J. Coles, P. M. Anisimov, S. M. Mniszewski, S. Tretiak, and P. A. Dub, npj Quantum Information8, 96 (2022)

    2022

  37. [38]

    T. M. Henderson, I. W. Bulik, and G. E. Scuseria, The Journal of Chemical Physics142, 214116 (2015)

    2015

  38. [39]

    T. M. Henderson, I. W. Bulik, T. Stein, and G. E. Scuseria, The Journal of Chemical Physics141, 244104 (2014)

    2014

  39. [40]

    P. C. Hiberty, D. Danovich, and S. Shaik, inA Chemist’s Guide to Valence Bond Theory(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2026) Chap. 4, pp. 83–95

    2026

  40. [41]

    S. E. Ghasempouri, G. W. Dueck, and S. De Baerdemacker, The Journal of Physical Chem- istry A127, 8168 (2023)

    2023

  41. [42]

    P. B. Karadakov, inChemical Modelling: Volume 5, edited by A. Hinchliffe (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2008)

    2008

  42. [43]

    Simonetta, E

    M. Simonetta, E. Gianinetti, and I. Vandoni, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics48, 1579 (1968)

    1968

  43. [44]

    Rumer, Göttinger Nachr.3, 337 (1932)

    G. Rumer, Göttinger Nachr.3, 337 (1932)

    1932

  44. [45]

    J. S. Kottmann, Quantum7, 1073 (2023)

    2023

  45. [46]

    Granet and H

    E. Granet and H. Dreyer, npj Quantum Information 10, 1 (2024)

    2024

  46. [47]

    Google AI Quantum and Collaborators, Science369, 1084 (2020)

    2020

  47. [48]

    Zhang, T

    Z.-J. Zhang, T. H. Kyaw, J. Kottmann, M. Deg- roote, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Quantum Sci. and Tech- nol. (2021)

    2021

  48. [49]

    Bytautas, T

    L. Bytautas, T. M. Henderson, C. A. Jiménez-Hoyos, J. K. Ellis, and G. E. Scuseria, The Journal of Chemical Physics135, 044119 (2011)

    2011

  49. [50]

    P. A. Limacher, T. D. Kim, P. W. Ayers, P. A. Johnson, S. De Baerdemacker, D. Van Neck, and P. Bultinck, Molecular Physics112, 853 (2014)

    2014

  50. [51]

    P. A. Limacher, The Journal of Chemical Physics164, 104117 (2026)

    2026

  51. [52]

    W. J. Hehre, R. F. Stewart, and J. A. Pople, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics51, 2657 (1969)

    1969

  52. [53]

    Bincoletto, K

    D. Bincoletto, K. Stein, J. Motyl, and J. S. Kottmann, Machine Learning: Science and Technology7, 035055 (2026)

    2026

  53. [54]

    T. Y. Nikolaienko and L. A. Bulavin, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry119, e25798 (2019)

    2019

  54. [55]

    Schollwoeck, Annals of Physics326, 96 (2011), arXiv:1008.3477 [cond-mat]

    U. Schollwoeck, Annals of Physics326, 96 (2011), arXiv:1008.3477 [cond-mat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  55. [56]

    G. K.-L. Chan and S. Sharma, Annual Review of Phys- ical Chemistry62, 465 (2011)

    2011

  56. [57]

    Baiardi and M

    A. Baiardi and M. Reiher, The Journal of Chemical Physics152, 040903 (2020), arXiv:1910.00137 [physics]

    arXiv 2020

  57. [58]

    Yanai, Y

    T. Yanai, Y. Kurashige, W. Mizukami, J. Chalupský, T. N. Lan, and M. Saitow, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry115, 283 (2015)

    2015

  58. [59]

    A. O. Mitrushchenkov, G. Fano, R. Linguerri, and P. Palmieri, International Journal of Quantum Chem- istry112, 1606 (2012)

    2012

  59. [60]

    Langkabel, S

    F. Langkabel, S. Knecht, and J. S. Kottmann, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.19116 (2024), arXiv:2410.19116 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  60. [61]

    Langkabel, J

    F. Langkabel, J. Kottmann, T. Scharfe, and T. Truong, FrayedEnds, github Repository

  61. [62]

    Crawford, B

    O. Crawford, B. van Straaten, D. Wang, T. Parks, E. Campbell, and S. Brierley, Quantum5, 385 (2021)

    2021

  62. [63]

    Z. P. Bansingh, T.-C. Yen, P. D. Johnson, and A. F. Izmaylov, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A126, 7007 (2022)

    2022

  63. [64]

    Verteletskyi, T.-C

    V. Verteletskyi, T.-C. Yen, and A. F. Izmaylov, The Journal of Chemical Physics152, 124114 (2020)

    2020

  64. [65]

    Y. S. Yordanov, D. R. Arvidsson-Shukur, and C. H. Barnes, Physical Review A102, 062612 (2020)

    2020

  65. [66]

    F. J. del Arco Santos, D. Bincoletto, J. S. Kottmann, and N. Roshani, Project-sunrise (2026), github Repos- itory

    2026

  66. [67]

    J. S. Kottmann, S. Alperin-Lea, T. Tamayo-Mendoza, A. Cervera-Lierta, C. Lavigne, T.-C. Yen, V. Vertelet- skyi, P. Schleich, A. Anand, M. Degroote, S. Chaney, M. Kesibi, N. G. Curnow, B. Solo, G. Tsilimigkounakis, C. Zendejas-Morales, A. F. Izmaylov, and A. Aspuru- Guzik, Quantum Science and Technology6, 024009 (2021)

    2021

  67. [68]

    Suzuki, Y

    Y. Suzuki, Y. Kawase, Y. Masumura, Y. Hiraga, M. Nakadai, J. Chen, K. M. Nakanishi, K. Mi- tarai, R. Imai, S. Tamiya, T. Yamamoto, T. Yan, T. Kawakubo, Y. O. Nakagawa, Y. Ibe, Y. Zhang, H. Yamashita, H. Yoshimura, A. Hayashi, and K. Fujii, Quantum5, 559 (2021)

    2021

  68. [69]

    McClean, N

    J. McClean, N. Rubin, K. Sung, I. D. Kivlichan, X. Bonet-Monroig, Y. Cao, C. Dai, E. S. Fried, C. Gid- ney, B. Gimby,et al., Quantum Science and Technology (2020)

    2020

  69. [70]

    Q. Sun, T. C. Berkelbach, N. S. Blunt, G. H. Booth, S. Guo, Z. Li, J. Liu, J. D. McClain, E. R. Sayfutyarova, S. Sharma, S. Wouters, and G. K.-L. Chan, Wiley In- terdisciplinary Review Compututational Molecular Sci- ence8, e1340 (2018)

    2018

  70. [71]

    Q. Sun, X. Zhang, S. Banerjee, P. Bao, M. Barbry, N. S. Blunt, N. A. Bogdanov, G. H. Booth, J. Chen, Z.-H. Cui, J. J. Eriksen, andet. al., The Journal of Chemical Physics153, 024109 (2020)

    2020

  71. [72]

    Q. Sun, X. Zhang, S. Banerjee, P. Bao, M. Barbry, N. S. Blunt, N. A. Bogdanov, G. H. Booth, J. Chen, Z.-H. Cui,et al.,TheJournalofChemicalPhysics153(2020)

    2020

  72. [73]

    H. Zhai, H. R. Larsson, S. Lee, Z.-H. Cui, T. Zhu, C. Sun, L. Peng, R. Peng, K. Liao, J. Tölle, J. Yang, S. Li, and G. K.-L. Chan, The Journal of Chemical Physics159, 234801 (2023)

    2023

  73. [74]

    J. S. Kottmann, A. Anand, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Chemical Science12, 3497 (2021), arxiv:2011.05938 [physics, physics:quant-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  74. [75]

    R. J. Harrison, G. Beylkin, F. A. Bischoff, J. A. Calvin, G. I. Fann, J. Fosso-Tande, D. Galindo, J. R. Ham- mond, R. Hartman-Baker, J. C. Hill,et al., SIAM Jour- nal on Scientific Computing38, S123 (2016)

    2016

  75. [76]

    J. S. Kottmann, F. A. Bischoff, and E. F. Valeev, The Journal of Chemical Physics152, 074105 (2020)

    2020

  76. [77]

    T. Y. Nikolaienko, L. A. Bulavin, and D. M. Hovorun, Computational and Theoretical Chemistry1050, 15 (2014). [65]qpicpackage: github.com/qpic (2026)

    2014