pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27910 · v1 · pith:W76DNKKLnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · ✦ hep-ph

Antideuteron production from beauty-hadron decays: a first phenomenological study

Marta Razza , Nicol\`o Jacazio , Francesca Bellini This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 04:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords antideuteron productionbeauty hadron decayscoalescence modelbranching ratiosPYTHIA hadronizationALICE experimentantinuclei
0
0 comments X

The pith

This paper provides the first estimates of antideuteron production branching ratios from Lambda_b baryon and B meson decays using PYTHIA and a coalescence model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors simulate decays of beauty hadrons with PYTHIA under three hadronization scenarios and model antideuteron formation with a quantum-mechanical coalescence approach based on the Argonne v18 wave function. They compute inclusive branching ratios that vary with the chosen hadronization model but remain large enough for the resulting antideuterons to fall inside the kinematic acceptance of the ALICE experiment. The work supplies the first quantitative benchmark for these rare decay channels and connects collider measurements to searches for light antinuclei.

Core claim

Using PYTHIA with realistic input kinematics and three hadronization scenarios together with a coalescence model derived from the Argonne v18 nucleon-nucleon potential, the inclusive branching ratios are (5.68 ± 0.02)×10^{-4} < BR(Λ_b → d + X) < (1.408 ± 0.004)×10^{-3} and (7.4 ± 0.3)×10^{-6} < BR(B− → d + X) < (4.34 ± 0.07)×10^{-5}, with the predicted rapidity and transverse-momentum distributions lying in the region where ALICE can identify antideuterons.

What carries the argument

A quantum-mechanical coalescence approach based on an antideuteron wave function from the Argonne v18 potential, applied to PYTHIA-simulated beauty-hadron decays under three hadronization models.

If this is right

  • The rapidity- and pT-differential yields populate the kinematic region accessible to ALICE identification.
  • The results establish a quantitative benchmark for antideuteron production from beauty-hadron decays.
  • The same phenomenological framework can guide dedicated experimental searches at colliders.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Confirmation of the lower bounds would imply that beauty decays contribute a non-negligible background to cosmic-ray antideuteron searches for dark matter.
  • A measured branching ratio below the lower edge would require adjustment of coalescence parameters or hadronization modeling in heavy-flavor decays.
  • The same simulation chain could be applied to estimate antihelium production from the identical parent particles.

Load-bearing premise

The Argonne v18 coalescence model combined with PYTHIA hadronization correctly describes how antideuterons form inside beauty-hadron decays.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement of the B− → d + X branching ratio lying outside the interval (7.4 ± 0.3)×10^{-6} to (4.34 ± 0.07)×10^{-5} would show that at least one hadronization scenario or the coalescence assumption fails for these decays.

read the original abstract

Light antinuclei, such as antideuteron ($\bar{\mathrm{d}}$) and antihelium (${}^{3}\overline{\mathrm{He}}$,${}^{4}\overline{\mathrm{He}}$), provide a link between collider physics and indirect Dark Matter searches. Despite extensive studies of antinucleus production in high-energy collisions, $\overline{\mathrm{d}}$ production from beauty-hadron decays remains experimentally unconstrained and has not yet been quantitatively predicted. In this work, we present the first phenomenological study of $\overline{\mathrm{d}}$ production from $\overline{\Lambda}_{b}$ baryon and B$^{-}$ meson decays, providing the first estimates of the corresponding branching ratios. Beauty-hadron decays are simulated with PYTHIA using realistic input kinematics and three hadronization scenarios. Antideuteron formation is modelled through a quantum-mechanical coalescence approach based on an $\bar{\mathrm{d}}$ wave function derived from the Argonne $v_{18}$ nucleon-nucleon potential. Depending on the adopted hadronization model, we estimate inclusive branching ratios to be $(5.68 \pm 0.02)\times10^{-4} < BR(\overline{\Lambda}_{b} \rightarrow \overline{\mathrm{d}}+X) < (1.408 \pm 0.004)\times10^{-3}$ and $(7.4 \pm 0.3)\times10^{-6} < BR(B^{-} \rightarrow \overline{\mathrm{d}}+X < (4.34 \pm 0.07)\times10^{-5}$. The predicted rapidity- and transverse-momentum-differential yields populate the kinematic region where $\overline{\mathrm{d}}$ can be identified by the ALICE experiment, motivating dedicated searches for these decay channels. These results provide a quantitative benchmark for $\overline{\mathrm{d}}$ production from beauty-hadron decays and establish a phenomenological framework to support future experimental searches, with potential implications beyond collider physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the first phenomenological estimates of inclusive branching ratios for antideuteron production in ar{\Lambda}_b and B^- decays. Beauty-hadron decays are generated with PYTHIA under three hadronization scenarios; antideuteron formation is modeled via a coalescence approach using the Argonne v18 wave function. The resulting model-dependent ranges are (5.68 ± 0.02)×10^{-4} < BR(ar{\Lambda}_b → ar{d} + X) < (1.408 ± 0.004)×10^{-3} and (7.4 ± 0.3)×10^{-6} < BR(B^- → ar{d} + X) < (4.34 ± 0.07)×10^{-5}, with differential yields stated to lie in the ALICE acceptance.

Significance. If the coalescence framework is applicable, the work supplies the first quantitative benchmark for an experimentally unconstrained process, directly supporting ALICE searches and providing input for indirect dark-matter analyses that rely on antinuclei fluxes. The use of multiple hadronization tunes is a positive step toward robustness.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and methods description] Abstract and methods description: the central branching-ratio intervals rest on the assumption that the coalescence probability computed from the Argonne v18 wave function (calibrated in high-multiplicity pp/AA collisions) remains valid inside the low-multiplicity, resonance-rich environment of beauty-hadron decays. No section compares the resulting p_T or rapidity spectra to measured antinuclei yields in any comparable process, nor varies the coalescence radius or wave-function parameters to propagate that uncertainty.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the quoted ranges span a factor of ~2.5 for ar{\Lambda}_b and ~6 for B^-, yet the text provides no data-driven preference among the three hadronization scenarios and does not fold the model spread into a single uncertainty band; this directly limits the definitiveness of the reported intervals as phenomenological predictions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our work's significance and for the detailed major comments. We address each point below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and methods description] Abstract and methods description: the central branching-ratio intervals rest on the assumption that the coalescence probability computed from the Argonne v18 wave function (calibrated in high-multiplicity pp/AA collisions) remains valid inside the low-multiplicity, resonance-rich environment of beauty-hadron decays. No section compares the resulting p_T or rapidity spectra to measured antinuclei yields in any comparable process, nor varies the coalescence radius or wave-function parameters to propagate that uncertainty.

    Authors: We agree that the applicability of the Argonne v18-based coalescence model (calibrated in high-multiplicity environments) to the low-multiplicity, resonance-dominated beauty-hadron decays constitutes an assumption of this first phenomenological study. Because antideuteron production in beauty decays is experimentally unconstrained, no measured yields exist for direct comparison in comparable processes. We will revise the manuscript to include an expanded discussion of this model assumption, its limitations, and the associated uncertainties. Variation of the coalescence radius or wave-function parameters is not performed here, as it would require additional calibration data unavailable for this process; we will note this explicitly as a direction for future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the quoted ranges span a factor of ~2.5 for \bar{\Lambda}_b and ~6 for B^-, yet the text provides no data-driven preference among the three hadronization scenarios and does not fold the model spread into a single uncertainty band; this directly limits the definitiveness of the reported intervals as phenomenological predictions.

    Authors: The reported ranges reflect the spread across three distinct PYTHIA hadronization scenarios, and the absence of experimental data on this specific process precludes any data-driven preference among them. The intervals are presented to quantify the model dependence rather than as a single preferred value. We will revise the abstract, results, and conclusions to more explicitly frame the spread as the estimated uncertainty due to hadronization modeling and to present it as a combined range or band where appropriate. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct experimental validation or calibration of the coalescence model in the specific environment of beauty-hadron decays cannot be performed, as no measurements of antideuteron production from these decays currently exist.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation uses external simulation codes and fixed external potential

full rationale

The paper computes branching ratios by feeding PYTHIA-generated four-momenta (three hadronization tunes) into a coalescence probability derived from the Argonne v18 wave function. No parameters are fitted to antideuteron yields in b-hadron decays, no self-citation chain supports the central premise, and the quoted intervals are direct outputs of the external codes rather than renormalized inputs. The calculation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The numerical results rest on the applicability of PYTHIA hadronization models and the Argonne v18-based coalescence prescription to beauty decays; no new free parameters are introduced beyond the choice among the three standard hadronization scenarios.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Coalescence model with wave function from Argonne v18 potential accurately models antideuteron formation from antiproton and antineutron in beauty-hadron decays
    Invoked to convert simulated particle yields into antideuteron branching ratios

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5891 in / 1343 out tokens · 45954 ms · 2026-06-29T04:00:09.928111+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · 12 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    : Dark matter searches with cosmic antideuterons: status and perspectives

    Fornengo, N., et al. : Dark matter searches with cosmic antideuterons: status and perspectives. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2013(09), 031 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2013/09/031

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/09/031 2013

  2. [2]

    : Antideuteron fluxes from dark matter annihilation in diffusion models

    Donato, F., et al. : Antideuteron fluxes from dark matter annihilation in diffusion models. Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 78(4), 043506 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.043506

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.043506 2008

  3. [3]

    : Antihelium from dark matter

    Carlson, E., et al. : Antihelium from dark matter. Physical Review D 89(7), 076005 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.076005

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.076005 2014

  4. [4]

    : Anti-helium from dark matter annihilations

    Cirelli, M., et al. : Anti-helium from dark matter annihilations. Journal of High Energy Physics 2014(8), 1–17 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2014) 009

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2014 2014

  5. [5]

    Cosmic rays, anti-helium, and an old navy spotlight

    Blum, K., et al. : Cosmic rays, antihelium, and an old navy spotlight. Phys. Rev. D 96(10), 103021 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.103021 arXiv:1704.05431 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.103021 2017

  6. [6]

    : Experimental observation of antideuteron production

    Massam, T., et al. : Experimental observation of antideuteron production. Il Nuovo Cimento A 63(1), 10–14 (1965) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02814251 18

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02814251 1965

  7. [7]

    : Observation of antideuterons

    Dorfan, D.E., et al. : Observation of antideuterons. Physical Review Letters 14(24), 1003 (1965) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.1003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.14.1003 1965

  8. [8]

    Nature 473(7347), 353–356 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10079

    STAR Collaboration: Observation of the antimatter helium-4 nucleus. Nature 473(7347), 353–356 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10079

    work page doi:10.1038/nature10079 2011

  9. [9]

    Journal of Physics: Conference Series 650(1), 012001 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1742-6596/650/1/012001

    Tomassetti, N., AMS Collaboration: AMS-02 in space: physics results. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 650(1), 012001 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1742-6596/650/1/012001

    2015

  10. [10]

    arXiv preprint (2018) arXiv:1809.09714

    Quinn, S., et al.: GAPS: A new cosmic ray anti-matter experiment. arXiv preprint (2018) arXiv:1809.09714

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Nature Physics 19(1), 61–71 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01804-8

    ALICE Collaboration: Measurement of anti- 3He nuclei absorption in matter and impact on their propagation in the galaxy. Nature Physics 19(1), 61–71 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01804-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01804-8 2023

  12. [12]

    : Reevaluation of the cosmic antideuteron flux from cosmic- ray interactions and from exotic sources

    Šerkšnytė, L., et al. : Reevaluation of the cosmic antideuteron flux from cosmic- ray interactions and from exotic sources. Phys. Rev. D 105(8), 083021 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.083021 arXiv:2201.00925 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.083021 2022

  13. [13]

    : Prospects to verify a possible dark matter hint in cos- mic antiprotons with antideuterons and antihelium

    Korsmeier, M., et al. : Prospects to verify a possible dark matter hint in cos- mic antiprotons with antideuterons and antihelium. Physical Review D 97(10), 103011 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.103011

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.103011 2018

  14. [14]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2024(11), 017 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/11/017

    Heisig, J., et al.: Darkraynet: emulation of cosmic-ray antideuteron fluxes from dark matter. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2024(11), 017 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/11/017

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/11/017 2024

  15. [15]

    Stefanuto, L., et al.: Revisiting predictions for cosmic-ray antinucleon fluxes from Galactic Dark Matter (2026) arXiv:2605.08338 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    CERN Seminar, May 2018, indico.cern.ch/event/729900

    Ting, S.: Latest results from the AMS experiment on the international space station (2018). CERN Seminar, May 2018, indico.cern.ch/event/729900

    2018

  17. [17]

    : Cosmic rays antideuteron sensitivity for the AMS-02 exper- iment

    Choutko, V., et al. : Cosmic rays antideuteron sensitivity for the AMS-02 exper- iment. Proc. 30th International Cosmic Ray Conference 4, 765–768 (2008). ADS:2008ICRC....4..765C

    2008

  18. [18]

    Physical Review Letters 126(10), 101101 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.101101

    Winkler, M.W., Linden, T.: Dark matter annihilation can produce a detectable antihelium flux through ¯Λb decays. Physical Review Letters 126(10), 101101 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.101101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.101101 2021

  19. [19]

    Aaij, R., et al.: Antihelium production in Λ 0 b decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 081901 (2024). arXiv:2407.XXXXX

    2024

  20. [20]

    ALICE Collaboration: Multiplicity dependence of light (anti-)nuclei production 19 in p-Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 800, 135043 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135043 arXiv:1906.03136 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135043 2020

  21. [21]

    Journal of High Energy Physics 1998(05), 007 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/ 1998/05/007

    Cacciari, M., et al.: The pt spectrum in heavy-flavour hadroproduction. Journal of High Energy Physics 1998(05), 007 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/ 1998/05/007

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/ 1998

  22. [22]

    SciPost Physics Codebases, 008 (2022) https://doi.org/10.21468/ SciPostPhysCodeb.8

    Bierlich, C., et al.: A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of pythia 8.3. SciPost Physics Codebases, 008 (2022) https://doi.org/10.21468/ SciPostPhysCodeb.8

    2022

  23. [23]

    JHEP 10, 110 (2024) https://doi

    ALICE Collaboration: Measurement of beauty-quark production in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV via non-prompt D mesons. JHEP 10, 110 (2024) https://doi. org/10.1007/JHEP10(2024)110 arXiv:2402.16417 [hep-ex]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2024)110 2024

  24. [24]

    LHCb Collaboration: Measurement of the b-quark production cross-section in 7 and 13 TeV pp collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(5), 052002 (2017) https:// doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.052002 arXiv:1612.05140 [hep-ex]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 119, 169901 (2017)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.052002 2017

  25. [25]

    ALICE Collaboration: Measurement of the B0-meson production cross section in proton–proton collisions at √s = 13.6 TeV (2026) arXiv:2603.18904 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune

    Skands, P., et al. : Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune. Eur. Phys. J. C 74(8), 3024 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3024-y arXiv:1404.5630 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3024-y 2013

  27. [27]

    : Towards the understanding of heavy quarks hadronization: from leptonic to heavy-ion collisions

    Altmann, J., et al. : Towards the understanding of heavy quarks hadronization: from leptonic to heavy-ion collisions. Eur. Phys. J. C 85(1), 16 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13641-5 arXiv:2405.19137 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13641-5 2025

  28. [28]

    : Review of particle physics

    Navas, S., et al. : Review of particle physics. Physical Review D 110(3), 030001 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.030001 2024

  29. [29]

    ALICE Collaboration: Charm production and fragmentation fractions at midra- pidity in pp collisions at the LHC with ALICE. J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol. 4, 100261 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspc.2025.100261 arXiv:2506.21746 [hep-ex]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jspc.2025.100261 2025

  30. [30]

    LHCb Collaboration: Enhanced Production of Λ0 b Baryons in High-Multiplicity pp Collisions at s=13 TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132(8), 081901 (2024) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.081901 arXiv:2310.12278 [hep-ex]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.081901 2024

  31. [31]

    Physical Review D 108(11), 112003 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.112003 arXiv:2308.04873 [nucl-ex] 20

    ALICE Collaboration: Study of flavor dependence of the baryon-to-meson ratio in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV . Physical Review D 108(11), 112003 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.112003 arXiv:2308.04873 [nucl-ex] 20

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.112003 2023

  32. [33]

    SEOBNRv5PHM: Next generation of accurate and efficient multipolar precessing-spin effective-one-body waveforms for binary black holes

    LHCb Collaboration: Measurement of b hadron fractions in 13 TeV pp collisions. Physical Review D 100(3), 031102 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 100.031102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 2019

  33. [34]

    : Robust determination of antinuclei production from dark matter via weakly decaying beauty hadrons

    Di Mauro, M., et al. : Robust determination of antinuclei production from dark matter via weakly decaying beauty hadrons. Physical Review D 112, 083017 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/s6cm-45b4 arXiv:2504.07172 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/s6cm-45b4 2025

  34. [35]

    : A verages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ τ -lepton properties as of 2018: Heavy flavor averaging group (hflav)

    Amhis, Y., et al. : A verages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ τ -lepton properties as of 2018: Heavy flavor averaging group (hflav). The European Physical Journal C 81, 1–326 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8156-7

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8156-7 2018

  35. [36]

    SciPost Phys

    C., B., et al.: A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3. SciPost Phys. Codebases, 8 (2022) https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb. 8

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyscodeb 2022

  36. [37]

    Jour- nal of High Energy Physics 2015(8), 003 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP08(2015)003 arXiv:1505.01681

    Christiansen, J.R., Skands, P.Z.: String formation beyond leading colour. Jour- nal of High Energy Physics 2015(8), 003 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP08(2015)003 arXiv:1505.01681

    arXiv 2015

  37. [38]

    : Production of tritons, deuterons, nucleons, and mesons by 30 GeV protons on Al, Be, and Fe targets

    Schwarzschild, A., et al. : Production of tritons, deuterons, nucleons, and mesons by 30 GeV protons on Al, Be, and Fe targets. Physical Review 129(2), 854 (1963) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.129.854

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.129.854 1963

  38. [39]

    : Deuterons from high-energy proton bombardment of matter

    Butler, S., et al. : Deuterons from high-energy proton bombardment of matter. Physical Review 129(2), 836 (1963) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.129.836

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.129.836 1963

  39. [40]

    Physical Review C 21(4), 1301–1310 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.21.1301

    Kapusta, J.I.: Mechanisms for deuteron production in relativistic nuclear col- lisions. Physical Review C 21(4), 1301–1310 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.21.1301

    1980

  40. [41]

    : Deuteron production from phase-space coalescence in the UrQMD approach

    Sombun, S., et al. : Deuteron production from phase-space coalescence in the UrQMD approach. Physical Review C 99(1), 014901 (2019) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevC.99.014901 arXiv:1805.11509 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2019

  41. [42]

    Collective behavior of light in vacuum

    ALICE Collaboration: Production of deuterons, tritons, 3He nuclei, and their antinuclei in pp collisions at √s = 0.9, 2.76, and 7 TeV. Physical Review C 97(2), 024615 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.024615 arXiv:1710.07703 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.97.024615 2018

  42. [43]

    ALICE Collaboration: Multiplicity dependence of (anti-)deuteron production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 794, 50–63 (2019) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.05.028 arXiv:1902.09290 [nucl-ex] 21

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.05.028 2019

  43. [44]

    ALICE Collaboration: Light (anti)nuclei production in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=5.02 TeV. Phys. Rev. C 107(6), 064904 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.107.064904 arXiv:2211.14015 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2023

  44. [45]

    Femtoscopy of pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=0.9 and 7 TeV at the LHC with two-pion Bose-Einstein correlations

    ALICE Collaboration: Femtoscopy of pp collisions at √s = 0.9 and 7 TeV at the LHC with two-pion Bose-Einstein correlations. Physical Review D 84, 112004 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.112004 arXiv:1101.3665 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.112004 2011

  45. [46]

    ALICE Collaboration: One-dimensional pion, kaon, and proton femtoscopy in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN =2.76 TeV. Phys. Rev. C 92(5), 054908 (2015) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.054908 arXiv:1506.07884 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.92.054908 2015

  46. [47]

    ALICE Collaboration: Centrality dependence of pion freeze-out radii in Pb-Pb collisions at √sN N = 2.76 TeV. Phys. Rev. C 93(2), 024905 (2016) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.024905 arXiv:1507.06842 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.93.024905 2016

  47. [48]

    : Femtoscopic study of the proton-proton and proton-deuteron systems in heavy-ion collisions at the LHC

    Acharya, S., et al. : Femtoscopic study of the proton-proton and proton-deuteron systems in heavy-ion collisions at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 871, 139921 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139921 arXiv:2505.01061 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139921 2025

  48. [49]

    Scheibl, R., Heinz, U.W.: Coalescence and flow in ultrarelativistic heavy ion col- lisions. Phys. Rev. C59, 1585–1602 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 59.1585 arXiv:nucl-th/9809092 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc 1999

  49. [50]

    Blum, K., Takimoto, M.: Nuclear coalescence from correlation functions. Phys. Rev. C99(4), 044913 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.044913 arXiv:1901.07088 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.044913 2019

  50. [51]

    : Examination of coalescence as the origin of nuclei in hadronic collisions

    Bellini, F., et al. : Examination of coalescence as the origin of nuclei in hadronic collisions. Phys. Rev. C 103(1), 014907 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.103.014907 arXiv:2007.01750 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2021

  51. [53]

    Physical Review C 51(1), 38 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.51.38

    Wiringa, R., et al.: Accurate nucleon-nucleon potential with charge-independence breaking. Physical Review C 51(1), 38 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.51.38

    1995

  52. [54]

    : High-quality two-nucleon potentials up to fifth order of the chiral expansion

    Entem, D., et al. : High-quality two-nucleon potentials up to fifth order of the chiral expansion. Physical Review C 96(2), 024004 (2017) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevC.96.024004

    2017

  53. [55]

    Di Mauro, M., et al.: Nailing down the theoretical uncertainties of D spectrum produced from dark matter (2024) arXiv:2411.04815 [astro-ph.HE] 22

    arXiv 2024

  54. [56]

    A femtoscopic Correlation Analysis Tool using the Schr\"odinger equation (CATS)

    Mihaylov, D., et al.: A femtoscopic correlation analysis tool using the Schrödinger equation (CATS). The European Physical Journal C 78(5), 394 (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5859-0 arXiv:1802.08481 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5859-0 2018

  55. [57]

    p-p, p-$\Lambda$ and $\Lambda$-$\Lambda$ correlations studied via femtoscopy in pp reactions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV

    ALICE Collaboration: p–p, p–λ, and λ–λ correlations studied via femtoscopy in pp reactions at √s = 7 TeV . Physical Review C 99(2), 024001 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.024001 arXiv:1805.12455 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.024001 2019

  56. [58]

    ALICE Collaboration: Production of light nuclei and anti-nuclei in pp and Pb–Pb collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Rev. C 93, 024917 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.024917 arXiv:1506.08951

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.93.024917 2016

  57. [59]

    ALICE Collaboration: Multiplicity dependence of (anti-)deuteron production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 794, 50 (2019) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.physletb.2019.05.028 arXiv:1902.09290

    arXiv 2019

  58. [60]

    ALICE Collaboration: Rapidity dependence of antideuteron coalescence in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with ALICE. Phys. Lett. B 860, 139191 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139191 arXiv:2407.10527

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139191 2025

  59. [61]

    Nature 648, 306 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-025-09775-5 arXiv:2504.02393

    ALICE Collaboration: Observation of deuteron and antideuteron formation from resonance-decay nucleons. Nature 648, 306 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-025-09775-5 arXiv:2504.02393

    arXiv 2025

  60. [62]

    ALICE Collaboration: (Anti-)deuteron production in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV. Eur. Phys. J. C 80(9), 889 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/ s10052-020-8256-4 arXiv:2003.03184 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2020

  61. [63]

    ALICE Collaboration: Measurement of the production of (anti)nuclei in p–Pb collisions at sNN=8.16TeV. Phys. Lett. B 846, 137795 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137795 arXiv:2212.04777 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137795 2023

  62. [64]

    ALICE Collaboration: The ALICE experiment: a journey through QCD. Eur. Phys. J. C 84(8), 813 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12935-y arXiv:2211.04384 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12935-y 2024

  63. [65]

    Testing production scenarios for (anti-)(hyper-)nuclei with multiplicity-dependent measurements at the LHC

    Bellini, F., Kalweit, A.P.: Testing production scenarios for (anti-)(hyper-)nuclei with multiplicity-dependent measurements at the LHC. Acta Phys. Polon. B 50, 991 (2019) https://doi.org/10.5506/APhysPolB.50.991 arXiv:1907.06868 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.5506/aphyspolb.50.991 2019

  64. [66]

    : Alternative coalescence model for deuteron, tritium, helium-3 and their antinuclei

    Kachelrieß, M., et al. : Alternative coalescence model for deuteron, tritium, helium-3 and their antinuclei. Eur. Phys. J. A 56(1), 4 (2020) https://doi.org/ 10.1140/epja/s10050-019-00007-9 arXiv:1905.01192 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-019-00007-9 2020

  65. [67]

    ALICE Collaboration: Search for a common baryon source in high-multiplicity 23 pp collisions at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 811, 135849 (2020) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.physletb.2020.135849 arXiv:2004.08018 [nucl-ex] 24

    arXiv 2020