pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27970 · v1 · pith:ZYZ5AVVTnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · 📡 eess.SP

A Beamforming Microwave Interferometric Radiometer for High-resolution Passive Imaging: Concept, Modeling, and Preliminary Demonstration

Ziyang Zhang , Hao Liu , Donghao Han , Te Wang , Jiyi Bian , Bingxu Li , Xing Tong , Mengyao Jiang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 03:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords beamforming microwave interferometric radiometersparse arrayaliasing suppressionpassive microwave imaginghigh-resolution imagingASRF array designShift-Accumulate method
0
0 comments X

The pith

Beamforming antennas in sparse arrays cut the elements needed for high-resolution passive microwave imaging.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a beamforming microwave interferometric radiometer that places beamforming-capable antennas into a large sparse array. This enlarges the spatial-frequency sampling interval, which lowers the total number of elements and the volume of cross-correlations required. A large aperture-to-sampling-interval ratio factor array design supplies narrow-beam spatial filtering that reduces brightness temperature aliasing from under-sampling. Beamforming further allows steering across multiple directions to offset the narrow instantaneous coverage. A three-element prototype and supporting model provide initial validation for the architecture.

Core claim

BF-MIR employs beamforming-capable antennas as interferometric elements in a large sparse array. The enlarged spatial-frequency sampling interval reduces the required number of elements and the cross-correlation burden, while a large aperture-to-sampling-interval ratio factor (ASRF) array design enables narrow-beam spatial filtering to suppress brightness temperature (TB) aliasing caused by spatial-frequency under sampling. In addition, beamforming enables dynamic beam steering across multiple pointing directions, thereby compensating for the limited instantaneous coverage of narrow beams.

What carries the argument

Beamforming-capable antennas used as interferometric elements within an ASRF-designed sparse array, together with the image-domain Shift-Accumulate method for aliasing analysis and suppression.

If this is right

  • Fewer array elements achieve equivalent spatial resolution compared with conventional interferometric designs.
  • The larger sampling interval reduces the computational load of cross-correlations.
  • Narrow-beam filtering from the ASRF configuration suppresses brightness temperature aliasing.
  • Dynamic beam steering compensates for limited instantaneous field of view while maintaining coverage.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The architecture may suit spaceborne high-resolution imaging if hardware scaling proves reliable.
  • The same beamforming-plus-sparse-array principle could apply to other passive or active imaging systems limited by aperture size and processing cost.
  • Tests across diverse real-world scenes would clarify how well the aliasing model holds outside the prototype conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The imaging model and aliasing-suppression strategy developed on the three-element prototype will translate to large-scale arrays without major unmodeled errors from real-world brightness temperature distributions or hardware imperfections.

What would settle it

A scaled array experiment that shows persistent aliasing or degraded resolution under realistic brightness temperature scenes would indicate the suppression strategy does not scale as modeled.

read the original abstract

High-resolution passive microwave imaging is important for numerical weather prediction, disaster monitoring, and oceanographic studies, but kilometer-level spatial resolution remains difficult to achieve because of aperture limitations and the high complexity of large interferometric arrays. This paper proposes a beamforming microwave interferometric radiometer (BF-MIR) for high-resolution passive microwave imaging. BF-MIR employs beamforming-capable antennas as interferometric elements in a large sparse array. The enlarged spatial-frequency sampling interval reduces the required number of elements and the cross-correlation burden, while a large aperture-to-sampling-interval ratio factor (ASRF) array design enables narrow-beam spatial filtering to suppress brightness temperature (TB) aliasing caused by spatial-frequency under sampling. In addition, beamforming enables dynamic beam steering across multiple pointing directions, thereby compensating for the limited instantaneous coverage of narrow beams. A beamforming interferometric imaging model is established, and the relationships among spatial resolution, radiometric sensitivity, and effective field of view are analyzed. An image-domain Shift-Accumulate method is further introduced to analyze aliasing, based on which an aliasing suppression strategy is developed. In addition, a three-element proof-of-concept prototype provides preliminary experimental validation of dynamic beam interferometric measurement and dynamic beam observation modes. These results indicate that BF-MIR is a promising architecture for further spaceborne high-resolution passive microwave imaging.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a beamforming microwave interferometric radiometer (BF-MIR) architecture that integrates beamforming-capable antennas into a large sparse array. It claims that an enlarged spatial-frequency sampling interval combined with a large aperture-to-sampling-interval ratio factor (ASRF) design enables narrow-beam spatial filtering to suppress brightness temperature aliasing, while dynamic beam steering compensates for limited instantaneous coverage. A beamforming interferometric imaging model is derived, relationships among resolution, sensitivity, and field of view are analyzed, an image-domain Shift-Accumulate method is introduced for aliasing analysis, and a three-element prototype demonstrates dynamic beam measurement and observation modes.

Significance. If the aliasing suppression via ASRF and Shift-Accumulate translates to large arrays, the approach could substantially reduce element count and cross-correlation burden for kilometer-scale passive microwave imaging, addressing a key barrier for spaceborne applications in weather and ocean monitoring. The modeling framework and explicit analysis of resolution-sensitivity trade-offs are strengths; the three-element prototype provides concrete evidence of dynamic beam capability.

major comments (2)
  1. [section on aliasing suppression strategy and prototype demonstration] The aliasing suppression strategy (large ASRF enabling narrow-beam filtering to suppress TB aliasing from enlarged spatial-frequency sampling) is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the three-element prototype section only validates dynamic beam interferometric measurement and observation modes; no simulated or experimental result applies the Shift-Accumulate method to a scene whose spatial-frequency content exceeds the sampling interval, leaving open whether sidelobes, real TB variability, or phase errors produce residual aliasing.
  2. [beamforming interferometric imaging model and analysis section] The beamforming interferometric imaging model and its relationships among spatial resolution, radiometric sensitivity, and effective field of view are presented as enabling the architecture, but without quantitative error bounds or comparison to conventional MIR baselines on undersampled scenes, it is unclear whether the model assumptions hold when the ASRF-based filtering is applied at scale.
minor comments (1)
  1. [abstract] The abstract states that results 'indicate that BF-MIR is a promising architecture' but provides no quantitative metrics (e.g., aliasing reduction factor, sensitivity values) from the prototype; adding these would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and for recognizing the potential of the BF-MIR architecture. We address each major comment below. Where the comments correctly identify gaps in validation, we agree that revisions are required and will incorporate additional analysis and simulations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The aliasing suppression strategy (large ASRF enabling narrow-beam filtering to suppress TB aliasing from enlarged spatial-frequency sampling) is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the three-element prototype section only validates dynamic beam interferometric measurement and observation modes; no simulated or experimental result applies the Shift-Accumulate method to a scene whose spatial-frequency content exceeds the sampling interval, leaving open whether sidelobes, real TB variability, or phase errors produce residual aliasing.

    Authors: We agree that the three-element prototype primarily demonstrates dynamic beam measurement and observation modes, while the aliasing suppression claims rely on the theoretical development of the Shift-Accumulate method and associated simulations. The manuscript does not currently include explicit simulations applying Shift-Accumulate to scenes whose spatial-frequency content exceeds the sampling interval with explicit checks for residual aliasing from sidelobes, TB variability, or phase errors. We will add such targeted simulations in the revised manuscript to directly address this validation gap. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The beamforming interferometric imaging model and its relationships among spatial resolution, radiometric sensitivity, and effective field of view are presented as enabling the architecture, but without quantitative error bounds or comparison to conventional MIR baselines on undersampled scenes, it is unclear whether the model assumptions hold when the ASRF-based filtering is applied at scale.

    Authors: The model is derived from first principles for the beamforming array geometry, and the resolution-sensitivity-FOV trade-offs are analyzed analytically. However, the manuscript does not provide quantitative error bounds or side-by-side comparisons against conventional MIR on explicitly undersampled scenes. We acknowledge this limits assessment of assumption robustness at scale and will add quantitative error analysis together with direct comparisons to conventional MIR baselines under undersampled conditions in the revision. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: new architecture and methods introduced without reduction to inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper defines BF-MIR as a novel sparse-array architecture using beamforming antennas, introduces ASRF explicitly as a design choice to enable narrow-beam filtering, establishes a beamforming interferometric model from first principles, and proposes the image-domain Shift-Accumulate method as an analysis tool for aliasing. The three-element prototype provides independent experimental validation of dynamic beam modes. No equations or claims reduce predictions to fitted parameters by construction, no self-citations are load-bearing for core results, and no ansatz or uniqueness is smuggled via prior author work. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract; the ASRF is described as a design choice rather than a fitted value, and the model is presented as derived from standard interferometry principles.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5798 in / 1309 out tokens · 39523 ms · 2026-06-29T03:27:52.464056+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A BF-MIR architecture is proposed for high-resolution passive microwave imaging, in which large -ASRF beam-steerable antennas are employed as the interferometric elements, and a corresponding beamforming interferometric imaging model is established

  2. [2]

    A quantitative system -level analysis framework is developed to characterize the relationships among key design parameters and major performance metrics, including spatial resolution, radiometric sensitivity, and effective FOV, thereby providing guidance for BF-MIR system design

  3. [3]

    To address the aliasing issue inherently introduced by the enlarged 𝑑𝑑𝑢𝑢, a Shift -Accumulate method is proposed for aliasing analysis, and an aliasing suppression strategy based on large -ASRF arrays is developed

  4. [4]

    The remainder of this paper is organized as follows

    A three-element proof-of-concept prototype is built to provide preliminary experimental validation of the proposed architecture, including dynamic beam interferometric phase measurement and dynamic beam observation under wide -area normal scanning and selected-beam staring modes. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section II introduces t...

    2066

  5. [5]

    10(a) which corresponds to the region covered by the staring observation mode in Fig

    Modified TB generation: Based on the high- resolution original TB scene𝑇𝑇 𝐵𝐵(𝜁𝜁, 𝜂𝜂) shown in Fig. 10(a) which corresponds to the region covered by the staring observation mode in Fig. 7(b), and the power pattern of the interferometric element |𝐹𝐹𝑛𝑛(𝜁𝜁, 𝜂𝜂)|2, the modified TB 𝑇𝑇𝐵𝐵 ′ (𝜁𝜁, 𝜂𝜂) is first calculated, as shown in Fig. 10(b)

  6. [6]

    9 For a hexagonal sampling grid, the replica location is given by (14)

    Replica localization: According to 𝑑𝑑𝑢𝑢, the center position of the nth periodic replica (𝜁𝜁𝑛𝑛, 𝜂𝜂𝑛𝑛) to be evaluated is determined in the direction -cosine domain. 9 For a hexagonal sampling grid, the replica location is given by (14)

  7. [7]

    In this way, the modified TB 𝑇𝑇� 𝐵𝐵 ′ (𝜁𝜁, 𝜂𝜂) including the accumulated aliasing contributions is obtained

    Aliasing accumulation: The portion of the selected periodic replica that folds into the fundamental domain is extracted and then added to the corresponding position in the fundamental domain. In this way, the modified TB 𝑇𝑇� 𝐵𝐵 ′ (𝜁𝜁, 𝜂𝜂) including the accumulated aliasing contributions is obtained. As an example, Fig. 10(c) shows the modified TB after ac...

  8. [8]

    Reconstructed TB calculation: The aliased modified TB is divided by the antenna pattern over the corresponding unit-circle region to obtain the reconstructed TB containing aliasing 𝑇𝑇�𝐵𝐵(𝜁𝜁, 𝜂𝜂), as illustrated in Fig. 10(d). (a) (b) (c) (d) Fig. 10. Shift-Accumulate method. (a) Input ori ginal TB; (b) Modified TB; (c) Modified TB with aliasing; (d) Recon...

  9. [9]

    Emery and A

    W. Emery and A. Camps, Introduction to Satellite Remote Sensing: Atmosphere, Ocean, Cryosphere and Land Applications. Elsevier, 2017. doi: 10.1016/C2015-0-04517-8

    work page doi:10.1016/c2015-0-04517-8 2017

  10. [10]

    Microwave interferometric radiometry in remote sensing: An invited historical review: MICROWAVE INTERFEROMETRIC RADIOMETRY,

    M. Martín-Neira et al., “Microwave interferometric radiometry in remote sensing: An invited historical review: MICROWAVE INTERFEROMETRIC RADIOMETRY,” Radio Sci., vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 415–449, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1002/2013RS005230

    work page doi:10.1002/2013rs005230 2014

  11. [11]

    ESTAR: a synthetic aperture microwave radiometer for remote sensing applications,

    D. M. Le Vine, A. J. Griffis, C. T. Swift, and T. J. Jackson, “ESTAR: a synthetic aperture microwave radiometer for remote sensing applications,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 82, no. 12, pp. 1787– 1801, Dec. 1994, doi: 10.1109/5.338071

    work page doi:10.1109/5.338071 1994

  12. [12]

    SMOS instrument performance and calibration after six years in orbit,

    M. Martín-Neira et al., “SMOS instrument performance and calibration after six years in orbit,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 180, pp. 19–39, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.036

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.036 2016

  13. [13]

    MICAP (microwave imager combined active and passive): A new instrument for Chinese ocean salinity satellite,

    H. Liu et al., “MICAP (microwave imager combined active and passive): A new instrument for Chinese ocean salinity satellite,” in 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) , Milan, Italy: IEEE, Jul. 2015, pp. 184 –187. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7325730

    work page doi:10.1109/igarss.2015.7325730 2015

  14. [14]

    A review of spatial downscaling of satellite remotely sensed soil moisture,

    J. Peng, A. Loew, O. Merlin, and N. E. C. Verhoest, “A review of spatial downscaling of satellite remotely sensed soil moisture,” Rev. Geophys. , vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 341–366, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1002/2016RG000543

    work page doi:10.1002/2016rg000543 2017

  15. [15]

    The small scales of the ocean may hold the key to surprises,

    H. Hewitt, B. Fox-Kemper, B. Pearson, M. Roberts, and D. Klocke, “The small scales of the ocean may hold the key to surprises,” Nat. Clim. Change, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 496–499, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41558-022- 01386-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41558-022- 2022

  16. [16]

    A Baseline for Global Weather and Climate Simulations at 1 km Resolution,

    N. P. Wedi et al. , “A Baseline for Global Weather and Climate Simulations at 1 km Resolution,” J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., vol. 12, no. 11, p. e2020MS002192, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1029/2020MS002192

    work page doi:10.1029/2020ms002192 2020

  17. [17]

    Residual corrective diffusion modeling for km-scale atmospheric downscaling,

    M. Mardani et al., “Residual corrective diffusion modeling for km-scale atmospheric downscaling,” Commun. Earth Environ., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 124, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s43247-025-02042-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02042-5 2025

  18. [18]

    A foundation model for the Earth system,

    C. Bodnar et al., “A foundation model for the Earth system,” Nature, vol. 641, no. 8065, pp. 1180 –1187, May 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41586 -025- 09005-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586 2025

  19. [19]

    A 1 -km resolution global ocean simulation promises to unveil oceanic multi -scale dynamics and climate impacts,

    J. Xie et al. , “A 1 -km resolution global ocean simulation promises to unveil oceanic multi -scale dynamics and climate impacts,” The Innovation, vol. 6, no. 7, p. 100843, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2025.100843

    work page doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2025.100843 2025

  20. [20]

    FuXi-DA: a generalized deep learning data assimilation framework for assimilating satellite observations,

    X. Xu et al., “FuXi-DA: a generalized deep learning data assimilation framework for assimilating satellite observations,” Npj Clim. Atmospheric Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 156, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41612 - 025-01039-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41612 2025

  21. [21]

    Assessing the Feasibility of an NWP Satellite Data Assimilation System Entirely Based on AI Techniques,

    E. S. Maddy, S. A. Boukabara, and F. Iturbide -Sanchez, “Assessing the Feasibility of an NWP Satellite Data Assimilation System Entirely Based on AI Techniques,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., vol. 17, pp. 9828–9845, 2024, doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3397078

    work page doi:10.1109/jstars.2024.3397078 2024

  22. [22]

    Multibeam Focal Plane Arrays With Digital Beamforming for High Precision Space -Borne Ocean Remote Sensing,

    O. A. Iupikov, M. V. Ivashina, N. Skou, C. Cappellin, K. Pontoppidan, and C. G. M. Van ’T Klooster, “Multibeam Focal Plane Arrays With Digital Beamforming for High Precision Space -Borne Ocean Remote Sensing,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 737 –748, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1109/TAP.2017.2763174

    work page doi:10.1109/tap.2017.2763174 2018

  23. [23]

    Expected Performances of the Copernicus Imaging Microwave Radiometer (CIMR) for an All ‐ Weather and High Spatial Resolution Estimation of Ocean and Sea Ice Parameters,

    L. Kilic et al. , “Expected Performances of the Copernicus Imaging Microwave Radiometer (CIMR) for an All ‐ Weather and High Spatial Resolution Estimation of Ocean and Sea Ice Parameters,” J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, vol. 123, no. 10, pp. 7564 –7580, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1029/2018JC014408

    work page doi:10.1029/2018jc014408 2018

  24. [24]

    Initial Results of the Geostationary Synthetic Thinned Array Radiometer (GeoSTAR) Demonstrator Instrument,

    A. B. Tanner et al. , “Initial Results of the Geostationary Synthetic Thinned Array Radiometer (GeoSTAR) Demonstrator Instrument,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1947 –1957, Jul. 2007, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2007.894060

    work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2007.894060 1947

  25. [25]

    A dual-gain antenna option for GeoSTAR.,

    A. B. Tanner, B. H. Lambrigsten, and T. C. Gaier, “A dual-gain antenna option for GeoSTAR.,” in 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Barcelona, Spain: IEEE, 2007, pp. 227–230. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2007.4422771

    work page doi:10.1109/igarss.2007.4422771 2007

  26. [26]

    A Geostationary Microwave Sounder: Design, Implementation and Performance,

    B. Lambrigtsen et al. , “A Geostationary Microwave Sounder: Design, Implementation and Performance,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., vol. 15, pp. 623 –640, 2022, doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3132238

    work page doi:10.1109/jstars.2021.3132238 2022

  27. [27]

    Conceptual design and breadboarding activities of Geostationary Interferometric Microwave Sounder (GIMS),

    H. Liu et al. , “Conceptual design and breadboarding activities of Geostationary Interferometric Microwave Sounder (GIMS),” in 2009 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium , Cape Town, South Africa: IEEE, 2009, p. III -1039-III–1042. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2009.5417956

    work page doi:10.1109/igarss.2009.5417956 2009

  28. [28]

    Imaging Analysis and First Results of the Geostationary Interferometric Microwave Sounder Demonstrator,

    Cheng Zhang et al. , “Imaging Analysis and First Results of the Geostationary Interferometric Microwave Sounder Demonstrator,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 207–218, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2320983

    work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2014.2320983 2015

  29. [29]

    Data Processing and Experimental Performance of GIMS- II (Geostationary Interferometric Microwave Sounder -Second Generation) Demonstrator,

    X. Guo et al., “Data Processing and Experimental Performance of GIMS- II (Geostationary Interferometric Microwave Sounder -Second Generation) Demonstrator,” in 2018 IEEE 15th Specialist Meeting on Microwave Radiometry and Remote Sensing of the Environment (MicroRad), Cambridge, MA, USA: IEEE, Mar. 2018, pp. 1 –4. doi: 10.1109/MICRORAD.2018.8430718

    work page doi:10.1109/microrad.2018.8430718 2018

  30. [30]

    A Novel Interferometric Microwave Radiometer Concept Using Satellite Formation Flight for Geostationary Atmospheric Sounding,

    A. K. Sugihara El Maghraby, A. Grubisic, C. Colombo, and A. Tatnall, “A Novel Interferometric Microwave Radiometer Concept Using Satellite Formation Flight for Geostationary Atmospheric Sounding,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. , vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 3487 –3498, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2800534

    work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2018.2800534 2018

  31. [31]

    A sparse synthetic aperture radiometer constellation concept for remote sensing of antarctic ice sheet temperature,

    A. B. Akins et al., “A sparse synthetic aperture radiometer constellation concept for remote sensing of antarctic ice sheet temperature,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 63, pp. 1 –21, 2025, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2025.3534466

    work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2025.3534466 2025

  32. [32]

    TriHex: Combining Formation Flying, General Circular Orbits, and Alias -Free Imaging, for High -Resolution L -Band Aperture Synthesis,

    M. Martín-Neira et al., “TriHex: Combining Formation Flying, General Circular Orbits, and Alias -Free Imaging, for High -Resolution L -Band Aperture Synthesis,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 61, pp. 1– 17, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3268560

    work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2023.3268560 2023

  33. [33]

    Autonomous assembly of large structures in space: A technology review,

    M. ROGNANT, C. CUMER, J. -M. BIANNIC, M. A. ROA, A. VERHAEGHE, and V. BISSONNETTE, “Autonomous assembly of large structures in space: A technology review,” p. 13 pages, 2019, doi: 10.13009/EUCASS2019-685

    work page doi:10.13009/eucass2019-685 2019

  34. [34]

    Topology Design of Modular Unit and Cable Network of On‐Orbit Modular‐Assembled Antenna,

    H. Li et al., “Topology Design of Modular Unit and Cable Network of On‐Orbit Modular‐Assembled Antenna,” Int. J. Aerosp. Eng., vol. 2024, no. 1, p. 6385683, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1155/2024/6385683

    work page doi:10.1155/2024/6385683 2024

  35. [35]

    An Algebraic Comparison of Synthetic Aperture Interferometry and Digital Beam Forming in Imaging Radiometry,

    E. Anterrieu, P. Lafuma, and N. Jeannin, “An Algebraic Comparison of Synthetic Aperture Interferometry and Digital Beam Forming in Imaging Radiometry,” Remote Sens. , vol. 14, no. 9, p. 2285, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/rs14092285

    work page doi:10.3390/rs14092285 2022

  36. [36]

    The More (Antennas), the Merrier: A Survey of Silicon -Based mm -Wave Phased Arrays Using 17 Multi-IC Scaling,

    B. Sadhu, X. Gu, and A. Valdes -Garcia, “The More (Antennas), the Merrier: A Survey of Silicon -Based mm -Wave Phased Arrays Using 17 Multi-IC Scaling,” IEEE Microw. Mag., vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 32–50, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1109/MMM.2019.2941632

    work page doi:10.1109/mmm.2019.2941632 2019

  37. [37]

    Race and Challenges for Developing Direct Satellite -to-Smartphone Communication Systems,

    H. Kim, G. -H. Gho, V. Va, H. Kim, S. Kim, and J. Ahn, “Race and Challenges for Developing Direct Satellite -to-Smartphone Communication Systems,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 54– 60, May 2025, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.002.2400400

    work page doi:10.1109/mcom.002.2400400 2025

  38. [38]

    A Fully Integrated 16 -Element Phased-Array Transmitter in SiGe BiCMOS for 60 -GHz Communications,

    A. Valdes-Garcia et al., “A Fully Integrated 16 -Element Phased-Array Transmitter in SiGe BiCMOS for 60 -GHz Communications,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits , vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 2757– 2773, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2010.2074951

    work page doi:10.1109/jssc.2010.2074951 2010

  39. [39]

    The visibility function in interferometric aperture synthesis radiometry,

    I. Corbella, N. Duffo, M. Vall -llossera, A. Camps, and F. Torres, “The visibility function in interferometric aperture synthesis radiometry,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. , vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1677 –1682, Aug. 2004, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2004.830641

    work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2004.830641 2004

  40. [40]

    Performance Analysis of Circular Antenna Array for Microwave Interferometric Radiometers,

    J. Wu, C. Zhang, H. Liu, and J. Yan, “Performance Analysis of Circular Antenna Array for Microwave Interferometric Radiometers,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 3261– 3271, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2667042

    work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2017.2667042 2017

  41. [41]

    Fringe‐ washing function calibration in aperture synthesis microwave radiometry,

    R. Butora, M. Martín ‐ Neira, and A. Rivada ‐ Antich, “Fringe‐ washing function calibration in aperture synthesis microwave radiometry,” Radio Sci., vol. 38, no. 2, p. 2002RS002695, Apr. 2003, doi: 10.1029/2002RS002695

    work page doi:10.1029/2002rs002695 2003

  42. [42]

    How digital correlation affects the fringe washing function in L -band aperture synthesis radiometry,

    M. A. Fischman, A. W. England, and C. S. Ruf, “How digital correlation affects the fringe washing function in L -band aperture synthesis radiometry,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 671– 679, Mar. 2002, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2002.1000326

    work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2002.1000326 2002

  43. [43]

    1.6 GHz Low -Power Cross -Correlator System Enabling Geostationary Earth Orbit Aperture Synthesis,

    E. Ryman, A. Emrich, S. B. Andersson, L. Svensson, and P. Larsson - Edefors, “1.6 GHz Low -Power Cross -Correlator System Enabling Geostationary Earth Orbit Aperture Synthesis,” IEEE J. Solid -State Circuits, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 2720 –2729, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2014.2354648

    work page doi:10.1109/jssc.2014.2354648 2014

  44. [44]

    Study of the Real -Time Onboard Radio Frequency Interference Detection and Mitigation Strategy for MICAP L -Band Radiometer,

    T. Guo et al. , “Study of the Real -Time Onboard Radio Frequency Interference Detection and Mitigation Strategy for MICAP L -Band Radiometer,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 60, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2022.3205963

    work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2022.3205963 2022

  45. [45]

    Onboard Information Fusion for Multisatellite Collaborative Observation: Summary, challenges, and perspectives,

    G. Gao, L. Yao, W. Li, L. Zhang, and M. Zhang, “Onboard Information Fusion for Multisatellite Collaborative Observation: Summary, challenges, and perspectives,” IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 40–59, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1109/MGRS.2023.3274301

    work page doi:10.1109/mgrs.2023.3274301 2023

  46. [46]

    Microwave Imaging Radiometers by Aperture Synthesis—Performance Simulator (Part 1): Radiative Transfer Module,

    A. Camps et al. , “Microwave Imaging Radiometers by Aperture Synthesis—Performance Simulator (Part 1): Radiative Transfer Module,” J. Imaging, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 17, May 2016, doi: 10.3390/jimaging2020017

    work page doi:10.3390/jimaging2020017 2016

  47. [47]

    Microwave Imaging Radiometers by Aperture Synthesis Performance Simulator (Part 2): Instrument Modeling, Calibration, and Image Reconstruction Algorithms,

    A. Camps et al. , “Microwave Imaging Radiometers by Aperture Synthesis Performance Simulator (Part 2): Instrument Modeling, Calibration, and Image Reconstruction Algorithms,” J. Imaging, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 18, May 2016, doi: 10.3390/jimaging2020018

    work page doi:10.3390/jimaging2020018 2016

  48. [48]

    Radiometer calibration using machine learning,

    S. A. K. Leeney et al., “Radiometer calibration using machine learning,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 34335, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598 -025- 16732-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598 2025

  49. [49]

    Deep-Learning-Based Approach in Imaging Radiometry by Aperture Synthesis: Application to Real SMOS Data,

    A. Khazâal, R. Faucheron, N. J. Rodríguez-Fernández, and E. Anterrieu, “Deep-Learning-Based Approach in Imaging Radiometry by Aperture Synthesis: Application to Real SMOS Data,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. , vol. 18, pp. 9321 –9332, 2025, doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2025.3555299

    work page doi:10.1109/jstars.2025.3555299 2025

  50. [50]

    MIRAS end-to-end calibration: application to SMOS L1 processor,

    I. Corbella et al., “MIRAS end-to-end calibration: application to SMOS L1 processor,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. , vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1126–1134, May 2005, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2004.840458

    work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2004.840458 2005

  51. [51]

    SMOS Calibration,

    M. A. Brown, F. Torres, I. Corbella, and A. Colliander, “SMOS Calibration,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 646– 658, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2007.914810

    work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2007.914810 2008

  52. [52]

    Analysis of Array Distortion in a Microwave Interferometric Radiometer: Application to the GeoSTAR Project,

    F. Torres, A. B. Tanner, S. T. Brown, and B. H. Lambrigsten, “Analysis of Array Distortion in a Microwave Interferometric Radiometer: Application to the GeoSTAR Project,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1958 –1966, Jul. 2007, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2007.898093

    work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2007.898093 1958

  53. [53]

    Phase and Amplitude Calibrations of Rotating Equispaced Circular Array for Geostationary Microwave Interferometric Radiometers — Theory and Methods,

    X. Guo, A. Camps, H. Park, H. Liu, C. Zhang, and J. Wu, “Phase and Amplitude Calibrations of Rotating Equispaced Circular Array for Geostationary Microwave Interferometric Radiometers — Theory and Methods,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 60, pp. 1 –15, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2021.3064340

    work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2021.3064340 2022

  54. [54]

    Phase and Baseline Calibration for Microwave Interferometric Radiometers Using Beacons,

    A. K. Sugihara El Maghraby, H. Park, A. Camps, A. Grubisic, C. Colombo, and A. Tatnall, “Phase and Baseline Calibration for Microwave Interferometric Radiometers Using Beacons,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 5242 –5253, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2949891

    work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2019.2949891 2020

  55. [55]

    An Effective Onboard Cold-Sky Calibration Strategy for Spaceborne L -Band Synthetic Aperture Radiometers,

    J. Ren, H. Zhang, Z. Wen, Y. Li, and Q. Zhang, “An Effective Onboard Cold-Sky Calibration Strategy for Spaceborne L -Band Synthetic Aperture Radiometers,” Remote Sens., vol. 16, no. 6, p. 971, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.3390/rs16060971

    work page doi:10.3390/rs16060971 2024

  56. [56]

    Amplitude and Phase Calibration with the Aid of Beacons in Microwave Imaging Radiometry by Aperture Synthesis: Algebraic Aspects and Algorithmic Implications,

    E. Anterrieu, “Amplitude and Phase Calibration with the Aid of Beacons in Microwave Imaging Radiometry by Aperture Synthesis: Algebraic Aspects and Algorithmic Implications,” Remote Sens., vol. 17, no. 6, p. 1098, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.3390/rs17061098

    work page doi:10.3390/rs17061098 2025