pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28102 · v1 · pith:3H2MQSTInew · submitted 2026-06-26 · ✦ hep-lat · hep-ex· hep-ph· hep-th

Mellin Moments of Pion and Kaon Unpolarized PDFs from Nonlocal Operators in Lattice QCD

Joshua Miller , Joseph Torsiello , Krzysztof Cichy , Martha Constantinou , Joseph Delmar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 01:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat hep-exhep-phhep-th
keywords lattice QCDparton distribution functionsMellin momentspionkaonWilson lineshort-distance factorization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Lattice QCD determines Mellin moments of pion and kaon unpolarized PDFs using nonlocal Wilson-line operators.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper performs a lattice QCD calculation to extract the first few Mellin moments of the unpolarized parton distribution functions for pions and kaons. It uses matrix elements computed from boosted mesons coupled to nonlocal operators that include a straight Wilson line on a specific ensemble with twisted-mass fermions. The analysis employs the short-distance factorization framework, comparing results at NLO and NNLO, and performs combined fits in momentum and coordinate space to obtain final values at a renormalization scale of 2 GeV. The work also examines SU(3) symmetry breaking and reconstructs valence PDFs from the moments. These moments offer direct, model-independent information on the momentum distribution of quarks inside these mesons.

Core claim

We present a first-principles lattice-QCD determination of Mellin moments of the unpolarized pion and kaon parton distribution functions using matrix elements of boosted mesons coupled to nonlocal operators containing a straight Wilson line. The calculation is performed on an Nf=2+1+1 ensemble of maximally twisted-mass fermions with a clover term, with lattice volume 32^3×64, lattice spacing a=0.0934 fm, and pion mass mπ=260 MeV. Matrix elements are computed for hadron momenta P3=0, 0.41, 0.83, 1.25, 1.66, and 2.07 GeV and analyzed within the short-distance factorization framework. Our final results are obtained from combined fits in (P3,z) space at next-to-next-to-leading-order and are quot

What carries the argument

Nonlocal operators containing a straight Wilson line in matrix elements of boosted mesons, analyzed through the short-distance factorization framework.

If this is right

  • The moments allow reconstruction of valence PDFs for the pion and kaon.
  • The calculation reveals the size of SU(3) symmetry-breaking effects in these distributions.
  • Consistency checks across different perturbative orders and RG improvement support the reliability of the NNLO results.
  • Dependence on OPE truncation and fit windows is quantified to assess systematic uncertainties.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These lattice moments can serve as benchmarks for phenomenological models of meson structure.
  • Future work could extend the method to higher moments or to polarized distributions.
  • The approach might be applied to other hadrons once computational resources allow finer lattices and physical quark masses.

Load-bearing premise

The short-distance factorization framework remains valid and the perturbative Wilson coefficients at NNLO are sufficiently accurate for the operator-product expansion truncation and coordinate-space fit windows employed on this single ensemble.

What would settle it

An independent lattice calculation using local operators or a different discretization that produces moments differing by more than the quoted uncertainties would falsify the result; likewise, a mismatch with moments extracted from global fits to deep-inelastic scattering data on pions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.28102 by Joseph Delmar, Joseph Torsiello, Joshua Miller, Krzysztof Cichy, Martha Constantinou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Bare matrix element [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Bare matrix elements [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Bare matrix elements [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Double ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Double ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Double ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Top: Even-order Mellin moments obtained at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Mellin moments extracted at fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Mellin moments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Mellin moments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Mellin moments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Mellin moments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. NLO (blue) vs NNLO (red) comparison for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Leading-order Mellin moment [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Evolution of the moments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Reconstructed distributions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Comparison of the pion (blue), kaon up-quark (red), and kaon strange-quark (green) distributions with the maximum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Pion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. Ratio of kaon up-quark to pion strange reconstructed PDFs (blue band) and CERN-NA3 experimental data [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21. Ratios of same order Mellin moments for pion to kaon up (left), kaon up to kaon strange (middle), and pion to kaon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_21.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a first-principles lattice-QCD determination of Mellin moments of the unpolarized pion and kaon parton distribution functions using matrix elements of boosted mesons coupled to nonlocal operators containing a straight Wilson line. The calculation is performed on an $N_f=2+1+1$ ensemble of maximally twisted-mass fermions with a clover term, with lattice volume $32^3\times64$, lattice spacing $a=0.0934$ fm, and pion mass $m_\pi=260$ MeV. Matrix elements are computed for hadron momenta $P_3=0$, 0.41, 0.83, 1.25, 1.66, and 2.07 GeV and analyzed within the short-distance factorization framework. We investigate the dependence of the extracted moments on the truncation of the operator-product expansion, the coordinate-space fit window, and the perturbative accuracy of the Wilson coefficients, comparing next-to-leading-order and next-to-next-to-leading-order results. We also perform an RG-improved analysis as a consistency check of the perturbative treatment. Our final results are obtained from combined fits in $(P_3,z)$ space at next-to-next-to-leading-order and are quoted at $\mu=2$ GeV. We also study the SU(3) symmetry-breaking effect and reconstruct the valence PDFs from the moments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims a first-principles lattice-QCD determination of Mellin moments of unpolarized pion and kaon PDFs from matrix elements of boosted mesons coupled to nonlocal straight-Wilson-line operators. The computation uses a single N_f=2+1+1 twisted-mass ensemble (32^3×64, a=0.0934 fm, m_π=260 MeV) with P_3 up to 2.07 GeV; matrix elements are analyzed via short-distance factorization, with explicit studies of OPE truncation, coordinate-space fit windows, NLO vs. NNLO Wilson coefficients, and an RG-improved consistency check. Final results are obtained from combined (P_3,z) fits at NNLO and quoted at μ=2 GeV, together with an SU(3)-breaking study and valence-PDF reconstruction.

Significance. If the short-distance factorization remains valid in the accessed regime, the work adds to lattice meson-PDF determinations by supplying moments extracted from nonlocal operators together with internal perturbative-consistency tests. The explicit variation of OPE truncation order, fit window, and perturbative accuracy (including the RG-improved cross-check) is a methodological strength that improves transparency of the matching procedure.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the calculation is performed on a single ensemble (a=0.0934 fm, m_π=260 MeV) with no continuum or chiral extrapolation. This is load-bearing for the central claim of a first-principles determination, because discretization effects at P_3 a ≈ 0.97 and quark-mass effects remain unquantified by explicit variation of a or m_π.
  2. [Abstract] Analysis method (abstract and paragraph describing the analysis): while NLO/NNLO and RG-improved comparisons test perturbative consistency, they do not directly probe the non-perturbative validity of the short-distance factorization assumption itself for the chosen fit windows at the accessed P_3 and z on this ensemble; higher-twist contributions therefore remain uncontrolled.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below, agreeing that both the single-ensemble limitation and the lack of direct non-perturbative validation of the short-distance factorization should be stated more explicitly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the calculation is performed on a single ensemble (a=0.0934 fm, m_π=260 MeV) with no continuum or chiral extrapolation. This is load-bearing for the central claim of a first-principles determination, because discretization effects at P_3 a ≈ 0.97 and quark-mass effects remain unquantified by explicit variation of a or m_π.

    Authors: We agree that the results are obtained on a single ensemble at fixed lattice spacing and pion mass, with no continuum or chiral extrapolation performed. Discretization effects at the highest momenta (P_3 a ≈ 0.97) and quark-mass effects are therefore not quantified by explicit variation. We will revise the abstract to state explicitly that this is a single-ensemble calculation and that the quoted results do not include systematic uncertainties from continuum or chiral extrapolation. A corresponding statement will be added to the conclusions regarding the need for future multi-ensemble studies. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Analysis method (abstract and paragraph describing the analysis): while NLO/NNLO and RG-improved comparisons test perturbative consistency, they do not directly probe the non-perturbative validity of the short-distance factorization assumption itself for the chosen fit windows at the accessed P_3 and z on this ensemble; higher-twist contributions therefore remain uncontrolled.

    Authors: We agree that the NLO/NNLO and RG-improved comparisons test perturbative consistency but do not directly establish the non-perturbative validity of the short-distance factorization or quantify higher-twist contributions for the chosen fit windows. These checks provide indirect support, yet higher-twist effects remain an uncontrolled systematic uncertainty. We will revise the abstract and the analysis-method paragraph to explicitly acknowledge this limitation and to discuss the assumptions underlying the selected fit windows. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct lattice matrix elements + perturbative matching

full rationale

The paper computes matrix elements of nonlocal operators on a single ensemble, then extracts Mellin moments via short-distance factorization and combined fits in (P3,z) space using NNLO Wilson coefficients. This is a standard numerical extraction; the quoted moments are not equivalent by construction to any fitted input or self-citation. No self-definitional loops, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The result remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on standard lattice QCD assumptions and perturbative matching; no new postulated entities are introduced. Free parameters are limited to analysis choices such as fit windows and truncation order.

free parameters (2)
  • coordinate-space fit window
    Choice of z-range used to extract moments; investigated for dependence in the abstract.
  • OPE truncation order
    Number of terms retained in the operator-product expansion; dependence explicitly studied.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Short-distance factorization applies to the nonlocal operators at the accessed lattice distances and momenta.
    Invoked when the matrix elements are analyzed within the short-distance factorization framework.
  • domain assumption The maximally twisted-mass clover action on this ensemble provides a valid discretization of QCD for the quantities computed.
    Standard assumption underlying all results on the given Nf=2+1+1 ensemble.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5798 in / 1561 out tokens · 39218 ms · 2026-06-29T01:46:42.633243+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 35 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    [52, 64, 65, 76]

    Moments at fixedzvalue A possible method for extracting the Mellin moments is to perform fits at fixedz, following the procedure of Refs. [52, 64, 65, 76]. In this approach, the reduced Ioffe-time distributionM(ν, z 2) is analyzed independently at each value ofzby fitting itsν-dependence using the truncated expansion of Eq. (4). For a given value ofz, the...

  2. [2]

    OPE”). By contrast, Refs. [50, 51] first reconstruct thex-dependent pion PDF and then determine its Mellin moments from the integral definition (“PDF fit

    CombinedP 3 andzfits An alternative strategy for extracting the Mellin moments is to perform a global fit to the reduced Ioffe-time distribution using the truncated expansion of Eq. (4). In practice, this requires determining the set of moments {⟨xn⟩}that best describe the data within a chosen range ofzandP 3 values, where the OPE is expected to be valid,...

    2025

  3. [3]

    J. S. Conway et al., Phys. Rev.D39, 92 (1989)

    1989

  4. [4]

    Aicher, A

    M. Aicher, A. Schafer, and W. Vogelsang, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 252003 (2010), arXiv:1009.2481 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  5. [5]

    Martinelli and C

    G. Martinelli and C. T. Sachrajda, Phys. Lett. B190, 151 (1987)

    1987

  6. [6]

    G¨ ockeler, R

    M. G¨ ockeler, R. Horsley, T. Manke, P. Rakow, G. Schierholz, and A. Schiller, Phys. Rev. D53, 2317 (1996), arXiv:hep- lat/9508004

    arXiv 1996

  7. [7]

    Martinelli, C

    G. Martinelli, C. Pittori, C. T. Sachrajda, M. Testa, and A. Vladikas, Nucl. Phys. B445, 81 (1995), arXiv:hep-lat/9411010

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  8. [8]

    Gockeler, R

    M. Gockeler, R. Horsley, H. Oelrich, H. Perlt, D. Petters, P. E. L. Rakow, A. Schafer, G. Schierholz, and A. Schiller, Nucl. Phys.B544, 699 (1999), arXiv:hep-lat/9807044 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  9. [9]

    Detmold, W

    W. Detmold, W. Melnitchouk, and A. W. Thomas, Eur. Phys. J. direct3, 13 (2001), arXiv:hep-lat/0108002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  10. [10]

    R. J. Holt and C. D. Roberts, Reviews of Modern Physics82, 2991–3044 (2010)

    2010

  11. [11]

    Alexandrou, S

    C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, I. Clo¨ et, M. Constantinou, K. Hadjiyiannakou, G. Koutsou, and C. Lauer (ETM), Phys. Rev. D104, 054504 (2021), arXiv:2104.02247 [hep-lat]. 25

    arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Brommel et al

    D. Brommel et al. (QCDSF-UKQCD), Proceedings, 25th International Symposium on Lattice field theory , PoSLAT- TICE2007, 140 (2007)

    2007

  13. [13]

    Br¨ ommelet al

    D. Br¨ ommelet al. (QCDSF/UKQCD), Eur. Phys. J. C51, 335 (2007), arXiv:hep-lat/0608021

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  14. [14]

    Brommel, Pion Structure from the Lattice, Ph.D

    D. Brommel, Pion Structure from the Lattice, Ph.D. thesis, Regensburg U. (2007)

    2007

  15. [15]

    Brommel et al

    D. Brommel et al. (QCDSF, UKQCD), Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 122001 (2008), arXiv:0708.2249 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2008

  16. [16]

    P. A. Boyle, J. M. Flynn, A. Juttner, C. Kelly, H. P. de Lima, C. M. Maynard, C. T. Sachrajda, and J. M. Zanotti, JHEP 07, 112 (2008), arXiv:0804.3971 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  17. [17]

    Kaneko et al

    T. Kaneko et al. (JLQCD, TWQCD), PoSLATTICE2008, 158 (2008), arXiv:0810.2590 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  18. [18]

    Aoki et al

    S. Aoki et al. (JLQCD, TWQCD), Phys. Rev. D80, 034508 (2009), arXiv:0905.2465 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  19. [19]

    Kaneko, S

    T. Kaneko, S. Aoki, G. Cossu, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, J. Noaki, and T. Onogi (JLQCD), PoSLATTICE2010, 146 (2010), arXiv:1012.0137 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  20. [20]

    G. Bali, S. Collins, B. Gl¨ assle, M. G¨ ockeler, N. Javadi-Motaghi, J. Najjar, W. S¨ oldner, and A. Sternbeck, PoSLAT- TICE2013, 447 (2014), arXiv:1311.7639 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  21. [21]

    G¨ ulpers, G

    V. G¨ ulpers, G. von Hippel, and H. Wittig, Phys. Rev. D89, 094503 (2014), arXiv:1309.2104 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  22. [22]

    Fukaya, S

    H. Fukaya, S. Aoki, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, H. Matsufuru, and J. Noaki, Phys. Rev. D90, 034506 (2014), arXiv:1405.4077 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  23. [23]

    B. Owen, W. Kamleh, D. Leinweber, B. Menadue, and S. Mahbub, Phys. Rev. D91, 074503 (2015), arXiv:1501.02561 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  24. [24]

    Abdel-Rehim et al., Phys

    A. Abdel-Rehim et al., Phys. Rev. D92, 114513 (2015), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 93, 039904 (2016)], arXiv:1507.04936 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  25. [25]

    A. J. Chambers et al. (QCDSF, UKQCD, CSSM), Phys. Rev.D96, 114509 (2017), arXiv:1702.01513 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    Koponen, F

    J. Koponen, F. Bursa, C. T. H. Davies, R. J. Dowdall, and G. P. Lepage, Proceedings, 35th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (Lattice 2017): Granada, Spain, June 18-24, 2017, PoSLATTICE2015, 119 (2015), arXiv:1710.07467 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  27. [27]

    Alexandrou et al

    C. Alexandrou et al. (ETM), Phys. Rev.D97, 014508 (2018), arXiv:1710.10401 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    G. Wang, J. Liang, T. Draper, K.-F. Liu, and Y.-B. Yang (2018) arXiv:1810.12824 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  29. [29]

    M. Oehm, C. Alexandrou, M. Constantinou, K. Jansen, G. Koutsou, B. Kostrzewa, F. Steffens, C. Urbach, and S. Zafeiropoulos, Phys. Rev. D99, 014508 (2019), arXiv:1810.09743 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    Colangelo, M

    G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, and P. Stoffer, JHEP02, 006 (2019), arXiv:1810.00007 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    Alexandrou, S

    C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, I. Cloet, M. Constantinou, K. Hadjiyiannakou, G. Koutsou, and C. Lauer (ETM), Phys. Rev. D103, 014508 (2021), arXiv:2010.03495 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    G. Wang, J. Liang, T. Draper, K.-F. Liu, and Y.-B. Yang (chiQCD), Phys. Rev. D104, 074502 (2021), arXiv:2006.05431 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    L¨ offler, P

    M. L¨ offler, P. Wein, T. Wurm, S. Weish¨ aupl, D. Jenkins, R. R¨ odl, A. Sch¨ afer, and L. Walter (RQCD), Phys. Rev. D105, 014505 (2022), arXiv:2108.07544 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Alexandrou et al

    C. Alexandrou et al. (Extended Twisted Mass), Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 252001 (2021), arXiv:2109.10692 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Alexandrou, S

    C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, I. Cloet, M. Constantinou, J. Delmar, K. Hadjiyiannakou, G. Koutsou, C. Lauer, and A. Vaquero (ETM), Phys. Rev. D105, 054502 (2022), arXiv:2111.08135 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    X. Gao, N. Karthik, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, S. Syritsyn, and Y. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D104, 114515 (2021), arXiv:2102.06047 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    D. C. Hackett, P. R. Oare, D. A. Pefkou, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D108, 114504 (2023), arXiv:2307.11707 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Alexandrou et al

    C. Alexandrou et al. (Extended Twisted Mass), Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 131902 (2025), arXiv:2405.08529 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Alexandrou, S

    C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, P. Jana, M. Petschlies, L. A. R. Chacon, G. Spanoudes, F. Steffens, C. Urbach, and U. Wenger, (2026), arXiv:2605.29998 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    Shindler, Phys

    A. Shindler, Phys. Rev. D110, L051503 (2024), arXiv:2311.18704 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Francis, P

    A. Francis, P. Fritzsch, R. Karur, J. Kim, G. Pederiva, D. A. Pefkou, A. Rago, A. Shindler, A. Walker-Loud, and S. Zafeiropoulos, Phys. Rev. D113, 074520 (2026), arXiv:2510.26738 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    Francis et al., Phys

    A. Francis et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 171903 (2026), arXiv:2509.02472 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    Ji, Phys

    X. Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 262002 (2013), arXiv:1305.1539 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  44. [44]

    X. Ji, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.57, 1407 (2014), arXiv:1404.6680 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  45. [45]

    A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Rev. D96, 034025 (2017), arXiv:1705.01488 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  46. [46]

    Radyushkin, Phys

    A. Radyushkin, Phys. Rev. D98, 014019 (2018), arXiv:1801.02427 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  47. [47]

    Zhang, J.-W

    J.-H. Zhang, J.-W. Chen, L. Jin, H.-W. Lin, A. Sch¨ afer, and Y. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D100, 034505 (2019), arXiv:1804.01483 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2019

  48. [48]

    Izubuchi, L

    T. Izubuchi, L. Jin, C. Kallidonis, N. Karthik, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, C. Shugert, and S. Syritsyn, Phys. Rev.D100, 034516 (2019), arXiv:1905.06349 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Jo´ o, J

    B. Jo´ o, J. Karpie, K. Orginos, A. V. Radyushkin, D. G. Richards, R. S. Sufian, and S. Zafeiropoulos, Phys. Rev.D100, 114512 (2019), arXiv:1909.08517 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    R. S. Sufian, J. Karpie, C. Egerer, K. Orginos, J.-W. Qiu, and D. G. Richards, Phys. Rev.D99, 074507 (2019), arXiv:1901.03921 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    R. S. Sufian, C. Egerer, J. Karpie, R. G. Edwards, B. Jo´ o, Y.-Q. Ma, K. Orginos, J.-W. Qiu, and D. G. Richards, Phys. Rev. D102, 054508 (2020), arXiv:2001.04960 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    Lin, J.-W

    H.-W. Lin, J.-W. Chen, Z. Fan, J.-H. Zhang, and R. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D103, 014516 (2021), arXiv:2003.14128 [hep-lat]. 26

    arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    X. Gao, L. Jin, C. Kallidonis, N. Karthik, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, C. Shugert, S. Syritsyn, and Y. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D102, 094513 (2020), arXiv:2007.06590 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    X. Gao, A. D. Hanlon, N. Karthik, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, P. Scior, S. Shi, S. Syritsyn, Y. Zhao, and K. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D106, 114510 (2022), arXiv:2208.02297 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    Holligan and H.-W

    J. Holligan and H.-W. Lin, J. Phys. G51, 065101 (2024), arXiv:2404.14525 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    X. Gao, S. Mukherjee, Q. Shi, F. Yao, and Y. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D113, 014505 (2026), arXiv:2511.01818 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    Miller, J

    J. Miller, J. Torsiello, I. Anderson, K. Cichy, M. Constantinou, J. Delmar, and S. Lampreich, (2025), arXiv:2512.06121 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Karpie, K

    J. Karpie, K. Orginos, and S. Zafeiropoulos, JHEP11, 178 (2018), arXiv:1807.10933 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  59. [59]

    Jo´ o, J

    B. Jo´ o, J. Karpie, K. Orginos, A. V. Radyushkin, D. G. Richards, and S. Zafeiropoulos, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 232003 (2020), arXiv:2004.01687 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    M. Bhat, K. Cichy, M. Constantinou, and A. Scapellato, Phys. Rev. D103, 034510 (2021), arXiv:2005.02102 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    Z. Fan, X. Gao, R. Li, H.-W. Lin, N. Karthik, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, S. Syritsyn, Y.-B. Yang, and R. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D102, 074504 (2020), arXiv:2005.12015 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    X. Gao, A. D. Hanlon, J. Holligan, N. Karthik, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, S. Syritsyn, and Y. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D107, 074509 (2023), arXiv:2212.12569 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    X. Gao, A. D. Hanlon, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, Q. Shi, S. Syritsyn, and Y. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D109, 054506 (2024), arXiv:2310.19047 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Chen, H.-W

    J.-W. Chen, H.-W. Lin, and J.-H. Zhang, Nucl. Phys. B952, 114940 (2020), arXiv:1904.12376 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Lin, Phys

    H.-W. Lin, Phys. Lett. B846, 138181 (2023), arXiv:2310.10579 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Bhattacharya, K

    S. Bhattacharya, K. Cichy, M. Constantinou, X. Gao, A. Metz, J. Miller, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, F. Steffens, and Y. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D108, 014507 (2023), arXiv:2305.11117 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    Bhattacharya, K

    S. Bhattacharya, K. Cichy, M. Constantinou, X. Gao, A. Metz, J. Miller, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, F. Steffens, and Y. Zhao, JHEP01, 146 (2025), arXiv:2410.03539 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Dutrieux, R

    H. Dutrieux, R. G. Edwards, C. Egerer, J. Karpie, C. Monahan, K. Orginos, A. Radyushkin, D. Richards, E. Romero, and S. Zafeiropoulos (HadStruc), JHEP08, 162 (2024), arXiv:2405.10304 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    H.-T. Ding, X. Gao, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, Q. Shi, S. Syritsyn, and Y. Zhao, JHEP02, 056 (2025), arXiv:2407.03516 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Constantinou and H

    M. Constantinou and H. Panagopoulos, Phys. Rev. D96, 054506 (2017), arXiv:1705.11193 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  71. [71]

    Alexandrou, K

    C. Alexandrou, K. Cichy, M. Constantinou, K. Hadjiyiannakou, K. Jansen, H. Panagopoulos, and F. Steffens, Nucl. Phys. B923, 394 (2017), arXiv:1706.00265 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  72. [72]

    Alexandrou, K

    C. Alexandrou, K. Cichy, M. Constantinou, K. Hadjiyiannakou, K. Jansen, A. Scapellato, and F. Steffens, Phys. Rev. D99, 114504 (2019), arXiv:1902.00587 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  73. [73]

    M. Bhat, W. Chomicki, K. Cichy, M. Constantinou, J. R. Green, and A. Scapellato, Phys. Rev. D106, 054504 (2022), arXiv:2205.07585 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2022

  74. [74]

    Li, Y.-Q

    Z.-Y. Li, Y.-Q. Ma, and J.-W. Qiu, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 072001 (2021)

    2021

  75. [75]

    Alexandrou et al., Phys

    C. Alexandrou et al., Phys. Rev. D98, 054518 (2018), arXiv:1807.00495 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  76. [76]

    Alexandrou et al

    C. Alexandrou et al. (Extended Twisted Mass), Phys. Rev. D104, 074515 (2021), arXiv:2104.13408 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    G. S. Bali, B. Lang, B. U. Musch, and A. Sch¨ afer, Phys. Rev. D93, 094515 (2016), arXiv:1602.05525 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  78. [78]

    Y. Su, J. Holligan, X. Ji, F. Yao, J.-H. Zhang, and R. Zhang, Nuclear Physics B991, 116201 (2023)

    2023

  79. [79]

    Alexandrou, S

    C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, I. Clo¨ et, M. Constantinou, K. Hadjiyiannakou, G. Koutsou, and C. Lauer (ETM Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D104, 054504 (2021)

    2021

  80. [80]

    P. C. Barry, N. Sato, W. Melnitchouk, and C.-R. Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 152001 (2018), arXiv:1804.01965 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

Showing first 80 references.