pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29668 · v1 · pith:ZFILMXANnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · ✦ hep-th · hep-lat

Understanding Color Confinement through Quantum Reference Frames and Relational Observables

Kei-Ichi Kondo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 05:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-lat
keywords color confinementquantum reference framesrelational observablesgauge theoriesYang-Mills theoryGauss lawWilson linesgauge-Higgs models
0
0 comments X

The pith

Color confinement is the absence of any global long-distance color quantum reference frame that could support isolated non-singlet relational observables.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper formulates color confinement using quantum reference frames, where colored quantities appear only as relational observables tied to a color frame or dressing field. The Gauss law removes local color charge from the physical bulk algebra, leaving only semi-local data such as boundary fluxes and Wilson lines. Confinement then follows directly from the non-existence of a globally well-defined long-distance color frame that would allow free non-singlet states. This relational picture reproduces the physical content of older confinement criteria while remaining independent of any particular gauge choice or unbroken BRST symmetry. The approach is checked explicitly in two-dimensional Yang-Mills theory, U(1) gauge-Higgs models, and reduced higher-dimensional models on hyperbolic spaces.

Core claim

Color confinement is characterized by the absence of a globally well-defined long-distance color QRF capable of supporting isolated non-singlet relational observables. By the Gauss law, local color charge is excluded from the physical bulk algebra, whereas semi-local data such as boundary fluxes and Wilson lines may remain. This formulation preserves the insight of the Kugo-Ojima picture without depending on a covariant gauge, unbroken global BRST symmetry, or a specific infrared criterion.

What carries the argument

Color quantum reference frame (QRF) together with relational observables defined relative to it; the Gauss law acts as the constraint that removes local color charge from the physical algebra.

If this is right

  • Isolated colored asymptotic states cannot exist because no supporting long-distance color frame is available.
  • Wilson-loop area law, preservation of center one-form symmetry, and restoration of residual gauge symmetry all become different manifestations of the same missing QRF structure.
  • Topological defects acquire a clear role as obstructions to extending a local color frame to global distances.
  • The formulation extends without change to gauge-Higgs theories and to models obtained by dimensional reduction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same relational logic may organize confinement criteria in four-dimensional Yang-Mills without requiring a new infrared order parameter.
  • Boundary observables in lattice formulations could be reinterpreted as the surviving semi-local data once the bulk color frame is absent.
  • If a long-distance color QRF can be engineered in a controlled sector, the theory should exhibit deconfined colored states.

Load-bearing premise

The quantum reference frame formalism applies consistently to color degrees of freedom in gauge theories.

What would settle it

An explicit construction, in a confining Yang-Mills theory, of a globally well-defined long-distance color QRF that supports an isolated non-singlet relational observable.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.29668 by Kei-Ichi Kondo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A Wilson loop with a rectangular loop C as a probe for a pair of external charges. By color confinement one usually means a stronger physical assertion: isolated colored objects, whether elementary or composite, do not occur as physical asymptotic states. The physical Hilbert space contains only states invariant under gauge redundancies, while possibly transforming under genuine boundary/asymptotic symmetr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Two particles A and B on a one-dimensional straight line with positions xA and xB, respec￾tively. The quantities xB|A = xB − xA and xA|B = xA − xB = −xB|A are relational observables with respect to the frames A and B, respectively. Taking xA = 0 is a gauge fixing. The same logic applies to color. A statement such as “the quark is red” is not meaningful by itself, because the word red presupposes a color ba… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The Wilson line W(x, x0; γ) from the base point x0 to the point x, and its gauge transformation by Ω ∈ G. In one spatial dimension the path is fixed once the base point and endpoint are chosen, so the Wilson line gives a particularly concrete QRF. away from possible global obstructions. Thus in 1 + 1 dimensions the QRF frame is not merely symbolic: it is the Wilson line that implements axial or contour gau… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A circle of length L: Σ1 = S 1 . There is no boundary charge, but a global holonomy around the circle remains after local gauge redundancy has been removed. Locally, the Wilson-line frame can remove A1. Globally, however, the holonomy remains: U := P exp  igYM I S1 dxA1(x)  . (4.12) Under a periodic gauge transformation, U transforms as U 7−→ Ω(0)UΩ(0)−1 . (4.13) Therefore the physical information is not… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The line Σ1 = R with static external charges R and R, and the color electric flux generated between them. In 1+ 1 dimensions the Wilson line connecting the sources is a segment of uniform electric flux. In a QRF frame in which A1 = 0, the Gauss law becomes ∂1E A(x) = T A R δ(x) − T A R δ(x − L). (4.19) With the boundary condition that the electric field vanishes outside the interval (0, L) between the char… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The open interval Σ1 = I = (0, L), with 0 < x < L. Local color charge in the bulk is constrained by Gauss law, while boundary electric flux can remain as a boundary observable. In temporal gauge, the Hamiltonian and Gauss law are again (4.2) and (4.3). Smearing the Gauss law with a test function ω A(x) gives G[ω] := Z L 0 dx ωA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The Wilson lines W(y; x; γ1) and W(y; x; γ2) along two paths γ1, γ2 from x to y, which cannot be moved into each other by a continuous deformation because of the presence of a defect denoted by the cross. The two curves have the same endpoints. paths from x to y. If the two paths pass to the left and right of a defect, the Wilson lines have the different values: P exp  i Z γ1:x→y A  6= P exp  i Z γ2:x→y… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A vortex and the contour C winding around the vortex. Therefore we find hN 7−→ e 2πim/N hN , Ψq,h 7−→ e −2πimq/N Ψq,h. (6.33) If q 6≡ 0 (mod N), the relational operator is not globally single-valued on the configuration space containing vortices. This is the Abelian toy-model version of QRF confinement: a defect obstructs the global construction of the frame, and nontrivial ZN charge cannot be represented … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The open Wilson line Uγ(t, r) along the interval [ǫ, r] from (t, ǫ) to (t, r). In the limits ǫ → 0 and r → ∞, it gives the boundary holonomy connecting the two ends of ∂AdS2. with κϑ being a constant coming from Sϑ, and the matter charge density ρ(r, τ ) = 2i(πφφ − φ ∗πφ∗ ), (8.7) the Gauss law is given by G(r, τ ) := ∂rΠ 1 (r, τ ) − ρ(r, τ ) ≈ 0. (8.8) For a smearing parameter α(r), the generator of the g… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The normalized Higgs field Φ in the reduced b AdS3 or H3 theory. It takes values in SU(2)/U(1) ≃ S 2 and supplies a local color direction, hence a partial QRF. where the right multiplication e iβ(x)T3 by U(1) is the residual Abelian ambiguity. A fundamental field ψ(x) with the transformation law ψ(x) 7→ Ω(x)ψ(x) may be written relationally as ψh(x) = h(x) −1ψ(x). (9.4) The local SU(2) gauge transformation… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: A magnetic monopole and the northern and the southern semi-sphere patches. For a unit monopole, take Φ( b x) = ˆr ATA. (9.8) 39 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The relational Higgs field Φrel(x) with a QRF given by a Wilson line W(x; x0; γ) along a path γ : x0 → x from a reference point to a bulk point in H3 ≃ AdS3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The Wilson line Wγb (X) as a boundary-anchored frame along a path from a base point b ∈ ∂AdS3 to a bulk point X ∈ AdS3. The base point is on the (t, z) boundary plane at ρ = 0. At the level of fields, the QRF reduction map is the contour-gauge-type transformation gen￾erated by gγb (X) = Uγb (X; A ) −1 . (9.20) The relational Yang–Mills field, the adjoint scalar field and the fundamental scalar field are r… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The surface Σ: C = ∂Σ surrounded by the Wilson loop C is divided into a collection of a small area a 2 . This is the simplest QRF interpretation of the area law: a loss of the area-density of relational color-frame information. area law ⇐⇒ information loss (11.6) The string tension is the rate at which relational color information is lost per unit area. string tension = loss rate of relational color-frame… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a formulation for understanding color confinement on the basis of quantum reference frames (QRFs) and relational observables. In the QRF approach to color confinement, colored quantities are not defined as isolated local fields, but rather as relational observables with respect to a color frame or a dressing field. By the Gauss law, local color charge is excluded from the physical bulk algebra, whereas semi-local data such as boundary fluxes and Wilson lines may remain. Color confinement is characterized by the absence of a globally well-defined long-distance color QRF capable of supporting isolated non-singlet relational observables. This formulation preserves the insight of the Kugo-Ojima type picture, while avoiding dependence on a particular covariant gauge, an unbroken global BRST symmetry, and a specific infrared confinement criterion. As concrete examples, we consider (1+1)-dim. Yang-Mills theory, (1+1)-dim. U(1) gauge-Higgs model, and the two-dim. U(1) gauge-Higgs model on $\mathbb{H}^2$ ($AdS_2$) and three-dim. SU(2) gauge-Higgs model on $\mathbb{H}^3$ ($AdS_3$) obtained by dimensional reduction of four-dim. SU(2) Yang-Mills theory restricted to symmetric-instanton sectors. Through explicit calculations in these examples and in controlled sectors, we provide nontrivial consistency checks for the validity of the present formulation. We also discuss prospects for four-dim. Yang-Mills theory and gauge-Higgs theories. QRF-based color confinement provides a relational formulation of why isolated colored asymptotic sectors are absent. At the same time, it clarifies the role played by topological defects and shows that other confinement criteria -- the Wilson-loop area law, the preservation of generalized symmetry, namely center one-form symmetry, and the restoration of residual gauge symmetry -- can be organized as manifestations of a common QRF structure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a relational formulation of color confinement in gauge theories using quantum reference frames (QRFs) and relational observables. Colored quantities are treated as relational rather than isolated local fields; by the Gauss law, local color charge is excluded from the physical bulk algebra while semi-local data (boundary fluxes, Wilson lines) remain. Confinement is characterized as the absence of a globally well-defined long-distance color QRF supporting isolated non-singlet relational observables. The approach preserves Kugo-Ojima insights without dependence on a specific covariant gauge, unbroken global BRST, or a particular infrared criterion. Consistency is checked via explicit calculations in (1+1)D Yang-Mills, (1+1)D U(1) gauge-Higgs, and dimensionally reduced U(1)/SU(2) gauge-Higgs models on AdS2/AdS3 from symmetric-instanton sectors of 4D theory. Various confinement criteria (Wilson-loop area law, center one-form symmetry, residual gauge symmetry) are organized as manifestations of the same QRF structure.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work supplies a gauge-independent relational perspective that unifies several standard confinement diagnostics under a common QRF structure and clarifies the role of topological defects in excluding isolated colored asymptotic sectors. The explicit calculations in controlled low-dimensional and reduced models constitute nontrivial consistency checks that strengthen the formulation and could guide extensions to four-dimensional Yang-Mills and gauge-Higgs theories.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that the formulation is independent of a particular covariant gauge and unbroken BRST; the main text should include a brief explicit comparison (e.g., in one of the (1+1)D examples) showing how the QRF construction remains unchanged under a change of gauge fixing to make this independence manifest.
  2. In the discussion of the AdS reductions, the precise mapping between the symmetric-instanton sector of 4D SU(2) YM and the 3D SU(2) gauge-Higgs model on H^3 should be stated with the relevant field identifications or truncation conditions to facilitate reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and positive summary of our manuscript, as well as for recognizing the significance of the QRF-based relational approach to color confinement and the value of the consistency checks in lower-dimensional models. The recommendation for minor revision is noted. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; reformulation is self-contained with explicit checks

full rationale

The paper advances a relational characterization of color confinement via QRFs, defining the absence of a global long-distance color QRF as the key feature. This rests on the standard Gauss law excluding local color charge from the physical algebra while retaining semi-local observables (boundary fluxes, Wilson lines). The formulation is tested via explicit calculations in controlled low-dimensional models ((1+1)D YM, U(1) gauge-Higgs, symmetric-instanton sectors on AdS2/AdS3). No steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-citations, or renamed inputs; the central claim organizes existing criteria (Wilson area law, center symmetry) under a common QRF structure without circular reduction. The derivation is independent of specific gauges or unbroken BRST, as stated.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on extending QRF formalism to gauge color via the Gauss law constraint and interpreting confinement as lack of global frame; no free parameters are mentioned.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Gauss law excludes local color charge from the physical bulk algebra, whereas semi-local data such as boundary fluxes and Wilson lines may remain.
    Invoked to argue that colored quantities must be defined relationally rather than locally.
invented entities (1)
  • color quantum reference frame (QRF) no independent evidence
    purpose: To define relational color observables and serve as the criterion for confinement
    Introduced as the key new concept whose global absence characterizes confinement.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5878 in / 1273 out tokens · 43823 ms · 2026-06-30T05:53:21.131871+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · 16 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Confinement of quarks,

    K. G. Wilson, “Confinement of quarks,” Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 2445

    1974

  2. [2]

    Quantum frames of referenc e,

    Y. Aharonov and T. Kaufherr, “Quantum frames of referenc e,” Phys. Rev. D 30 (1984) 368–385

    1984

  3. [3]

    Quantum reference systems,

    C. Rovelli, “Quantum reference systems,” Class. Quant. Grav. 8 (1991) 317–332

    1991

  4. [4]

    Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information

    S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph and R. W. Spekkens, “Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 79 (2007) 555–609, arXiv:quant-ph/0610030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  5. [5]

    Physics within a quantum reference frame

    R. M. Angelo, N. Brunner, S. Popescu, A. J. Short and P. Skr zypczyk, “Physics within a quantum reference frame,” J. Phys. A 44 (2011) 145304, arXiv:1007.2292 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    Symmetry, Reference Frames, and Relational Quantities in Quantum Mechanics

    L. Loveridge, T. Miyadera and P. Busch, “Symmetry, refer ence frames, and relational quan- tities in quantum mechanics,” Found. Phys. 48 (2018) 135–198, arXiv:1703.10434 [quant- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames

    F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz and Č. Brukner, “Quantum me chanics and the covari- ance of physical laws in quantum reference frames,” Nature C ommun. 10 (2019) 494, arXiv:1712.07207 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    A change of perspec- tive: switching quantum reference frames via a perspective -neutral framework,

    A. Vanrietvelde, P. A. Höhn, F. Giacomini and E. Castro-R uiz, “A change of perspec- tive: switching quantum reference frames via a perspective -neutral framework,” Quantum 4 (2020) 225, arXiv:1809.00556 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    Quantum reference f rames for general symmetry groups,

    A.-C. de la Hamette and T. D. Galley, “Quantum reference f rames for general symmetry groups,” Quantum 4 (2020) 367, arXiv:2004.14292 [quant-ph]. 72

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    Quantum reference frame transformations as symmetries and the paradox of the third particle,

    M. Krumm, P. A. Höhn and M. P. Müller, “Quantum reference frame transformations as symmetries and the paradox of the third particle,” Quantum 5 (2021) 530, arXiv:2011.01951 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Edge modes as reference fram es and boundary actions from post-selection,

    S. Carrozza and P. A. Höhn, “Edge modes as reference fram es and boundary actions from post-selection,” JHEP 02 (2022) 172, arXiv:2109.06184 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Quantum reference frames, measurement schemes and the type of local algebras in quantum field theory,

    C. J. Fewster, D. W. Janssen, L. D. Loveridge, K. Rejzner and J. Waldron, “Quantum reference frames, measurement schemes and the type of local algebras in quantum field theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 406 (2025) 19, arXiv:2403.11973 [math-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Switchin g quantum reference frames in theN -body problem and the absence of global relational perspect ives,

    A. Vanrietvelde, P. A. Höhn and F. Giacomini, “Switchin g quantum reference frames in theN -body problem and the absence of global relational perspect ives,” Quantum 7 (2023) 1088, arXiv:1809.05093 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Towards relational quantum field theory,

    J. Głowacki, “Towards relational quantum field theory, ” arXiv:2405.15455 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    Semi-local observables, edge modes and quantum reference frames in quantum electromagnetism: an algebraic approach,

    C. J. Fewster, D. W. Janssen and K. Rejzner, “Semi-local observables, edge modes and quantum reference frames in quantum electromagnetism: an algebraic approach,” arXiv:2508.20939 [math-ph]

    work page arXiv

  16. [16]

    Relationa l entanglement entropies and quantum reference frames in gauge theories,

    G. Araújo-Regado, P. A. Höhn and F. Sartini, “Relationa l entanglement entropies and quantum reference frames in gauge theories,” arXiv:2506.2 3459 [hep-th]

  17. [17]

    Quantum Reference Frames at the Boundary of Spacetime,

    V. Kabel, Č. Brukner and W. Wieland, “Quantum Reference Frames at the Boundary of Spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 106022, arXiv:2302.116 29 [gr-qc]

    2023

  18. [18]

    Gauss law codes and vacuum codes from lattice gauge theories,

    J. P. Lacambra, A. Chatwin-Davies, M. Honda and P. A. Höh n, “Gauss law codes and vacuum codes from lattice gauge theories,” arXiv:2604.060 87 [quant-ph] (2026)

    2026

  19. [19]

    Quantum Relativity of Subsystems,

    S. Ali Ahmad, T. D. Galley, P. A. Höhn, M. P. E. Lock and A. R . H. Smith, “Quantum Relativity of Subsystems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) 1704 01, arXiv:2103.01232 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Accessibi lity of Global Properties from Internal Quantum Reference Frame Perspectives,

    A.-C. de la Hamette, V. Kabel and Č. Brukner, “Accessibi lity of Global Properties from Internal Quantum Reference Frame Perspectives,” arXiv:25 10.09100 [quant-ph]

  21. [21]

    Local covariant operator formali sm of non-Abelian gauge theories and quark confinement problem,

    T. Kugo and I. Ojima, “Local covariant operator formali sm of non-Abelian gauge theories and quark confinement problem,” Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 66 (1979) 1

    1979

  22. [22]

    The Universal Renormalization Factors Z_1/Z_3 and Color Confinement Condition in Non-Abelian Gauge Theory

    T. Kugo, “The universal renormalization factors Z1/Z 3 and color confinement condition in non-Abelian gauge theory,” hep-th/9511033

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Nakanishi and I

    N. Nakanishi and I. Ojima, Covariant Operator Formalism of Gauge Theories and Quantum Gravity, World Scientific, 1990

    1990

  24. [24]

    Quantization of non-Abelian gauge theor ies,

    V. N. Gribov, “Quantization of non-Abelian gauge theor ies,” Nucl. Phys. B 139 (1978) 1

    1978

  25. [25]

    Local and renormalizable action from th e Gribov horizon,

    D. Zwanziger, “Local and renormalizable action from th e Gribov horizon,” Nucl. Phys. B 323 (1989) 513

    1989

  26. [26]

    Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity

    W. Donnelly and L. Freidel, “Local subsystems in gauge t heory and gravity,” JHEP 09 (2016) 102, arXiv:1601.04744 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  27. [27]

    A unified geometric framework for boundary charges and dressings: non-Abelian theory and matter

    H. Gomes, F. Hopfmüller and A. Riello, “A unified geometr ic framework for boundary charges and dressings: non-Abelian theory and matter,” Nuc l. Phys. B 941 (2019) 249, arXiv:1808.02074 [hep-th]. 73

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    Gauge-invariant formulation of quantu m electrodynamics,

    P. A. M. Dirac, “Gauge-invariant formulation of quantu m electrodynamics,” Can. J. Phys. 33 (1955) 650

    1955

  29. [29]

    Color confinement and res toration of residual local gauge symmetries,

    K.-I. Kondo and N. Fukushima, “Color confinement and res toration of residual local gauge symmetries,” PTEP 2022 (2022) 5, 053B05, arXiv:2111.06183 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Residual gauge symmetry and color confinement in the Yang–Mills theory,

    N. Fukushima and K.-I. Kondo, “Residual gauge symmetry and color confinement in the Yang–Mills theory,” arXiv:2507.11101 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    Restoration of residual gauge symmetries towards color confinement due to topological defects,

    N. Fukushima and K.-I. Kondo, “Restoration of residual gauge symmetries towards color confinement due to topological defects,” arXiv:2304.14008 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    Phase diagrams of lattice gauge theories with Higgs fields,

    E. Fradkin and S. H. Shenker, “Phase diagrams of lattice gauge theories with Higgs fields,” Phys. Rev. D 19 (1979) 3682

    1979

  33. [33]

    Hamiltonian formulation o f Wilson’s lattice gauge theories,

    J. B. Kogut and L. Susskind, “Hamiltonian formulation o f Wilson’s lattice gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 395

    1975

  34. [34]

    Nambu, Strings, monopoles, and gauge fields, Phys

    Y. Nambu, Strings, monopoles, and gauge fields, Phys. Re v. D 10, 4262–4268 (1974)

    1974

  35. [35]

    ’t Hooft, in: High Energy Physics, edited by A

    G. ’t Hooft, in: High Energy Physics, edited by A. Zichic hi (Editorice Compositori, Bologna, 1975)

    1975

  36. [36]

    Vortices and quark confinement in non-A belian gauge theories,

    S. Mandelstam, “Vortices and quark confinement in non-A belian gauge theories,” Phys. Rept. 23 (1976) 245

    1976

  37. [37]

    Dirac, Quantized Singularities in the Electrom agnetic Field, Proc

    P.A.M. Dirac, Quantized Singularities in the Electrom agnetic Field, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lon- don, A 133, 60–72 (1931)

    1931

  38. [38]

    Vortex-line models for dua l strings,

    H. B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, “Vortex-line models for dua l strings,” Nucl. Phys. B 61 (1973) 45–61

    1973

  39. [39]

    ’t Hooft, Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theorie s, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theorie s, Nucl. Phys. B 79, 276–284 (1974). A. M. Polyakov, Particle Spectrum in the Quantum Field Theor y, JETP Lett. 20, 194–195 (1974). Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 430–433 (1974)

    1974

  40. [40]

    Magnetic monopoles in hyperbolic spaces ,

    M. F. Atiyah, “Magnetic monopoles in hyperbolic spaces ,” in Vector Bundles on Algebraic Varieties, Oxford University Press, 1987; see also “Instantons in two and four dimensions,” Commun. Math. Phys. 93 (1984) 437

    1987

  41. [41]

    Some exact multi-instanton solutions of cl assical Yang–Mills theory,

    E. Witten, “Some exact multi-instanton solutions of cl assical Yang–Mills theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 121

    1977

  42. [42]

    Space-time symmetries in g auge theories,

    P. Forgacs and N. S. Manton, “Space-time symmetries in g auge theories,” Commun. Math. Phys. 72 (1980) 15

    1980

  43. [43]

    N. S. Manton and P. M. Sutcliffe, Topological Solitons, Cambridge University Press, 2004

    2004

  44. [44]

    Hyperbolic monopoles from hyperbolic vortices

    R. Maldonado, “Hyperbolic monopoles from hyperbolic v ortices,” arXiv:1508.07304 [math- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Quark confinement consistent with hologr aphy due to hyperbolic mag- netic monopoles and hyperbolic vortices unifiedly reduced f rom symmetric instantons,

    K.-I. Kondo, “Quark confinement consistent with hologr aphy due to hyperbolic mag- netic monopoles and hyperbolic vortices unifiedly reduced f rom symmetric instantons,” arXiv:2507.20372 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    Quark confinement and topology of gauge groups,

    A. M. Polyakov, “Quark confinement and topology of gauge groups,” Nucl. Phys. B 120 (1977) 429. 74

    1977

  47. [47]

    Quark confinement: dual superconductor picture based on a non-Abelian Stokes theorem and reformulations of Yang-Mills theory

    K.-I. Kondo, S. Kato, A. Shibata and T. Shinohara, “Quar k confinement: Dual supercon- ductor picture based on a non-Abelian Stokes theorem and ref ormulations of Yang–Mills theory,” Phys. Rept. 579 (2015) 1, arXiv:1409.1599 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  48. [48]

    Restricted gauge theory,

    Y. M. Cho, “Restricted gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. D 21 (1980) 1080

    1980

  49. [49]

    SU(2) gauge theory and electrody namics with N magnetic monopoles,

    Y. S. Duan and M. L. Ge, “SU(2) gauge theory and electrody namics with N magnetic monopoles,” Sci. Sin. 11 (1979) 1072

    1979

  50. [50]

    Partial duality in SU(N) Yang-Mills theory

    L. D. Faddeev and A. J. Niemi, “Partial duality in SU(N) Y ang–Mills theory,” Phys. Lett. B 449 (1999) 214, hep-th/9812090

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  51. [51]

    Wilson loop and magnetic monopole through a non-Abelian Stokes theorem

    K.-I. Kondo, “A gauge-independent magnetic monopole d ominance for quark confinement in SU(2) Yang–Mills theory,” Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 085029, arXiv:0801.1274 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  52. [52]

    Elitzur, Impossibility of spontaneously breaking l ocal symmetries, Phys

    S. Elitzur, Impossibility of spontaneously breaking l ocal symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 12, 3978– 3982 (1975). G. F. De Angelis, D. de Falco, and F. Guerra, Note on the Abelia n Higgs-Kibble Model on a Lattice: Absence of Spontaneous Magnetization, Phys. Rev . D 17, 1624–1628 (1978)

    1975

  53. [53]

    Gauge-independent transi tion dividing the confinement phase in the lattice SU(2) gauge-adjoint scalar model,

    A. Shibata and K.-I. Kondo, “Gauge-independent transi tion dividing the confinement phase in the lattice SU(2) gauge-adjoint scalar model,” Phy s. Rev. D 110 (2024) 034508, arXiv:2307.15953 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Confineme nt-Higgs complementarity and gauge-independent separation in SU(2) gauge-scalar model s,

    Y. Ikeda, S. Kato, K.-I. Kondo and A. Shibata, “Confineme nt-Higgs complementarity and gauge-independent separation in SU(2) gauge-scalar model s,” Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 054505

    2024

  55. [55]

    On the phase transition towards permanent quark confinement,

    G. ’t Hooft, “On the phase transition towards permanent quark confinement,” Nucl. Phys. B 138 (1978) 1

    1978

  56. [56]

    Greensite, An Introduction to the Confinement Problem , Springer, 2011

    J. Greensite, An Introduction to the Confinement Problem , Springer, 2011

    2011

  57. [57]

    Generalized Global Symmetries

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett, “Gen eralized global symmetries,” JHEP 02 (2015) 172, arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  58. [58]

    Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity

    T. Banks and N. Seiberg, “Symmetries and strings in field theory and gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 084019, arXiv:1011.5120 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  59. [59]

    Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality

    A. Kapustin and N. Seiberg, “Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and d uality,” JHEP 04 (2014) 001, arXiv:1401.0740 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  60. [60]

    The Surface Te rm in Gauge Theories,

    J.-L. Gervais, B. Sakita and S. R. Wadia, “The Surface Te rm in Gauge Theories,” Phys. Lett. B 63 (1976) 55–58

    1976

  61. [61]

    Hamiltonian Formulation of Nonabelian Ga uge Theory with Surface Terms: Applications to the Dyon Solution,

    S. R. Wadia, “Hamiltonian Formulation of Nonabelian Ga uge Theory with Surface Terms: Applications to the Dyon Solution,” Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 3615–3628

    1977

  62. [62]

    Role of surface integrals i n the Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity,

    T. Regge and C. Teitelboim, “Role of surface integrals i n the Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity,” Annals of Physics 88 (1974) 286–318

    1974

  63. [63]

    Henneaux and C

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge Systems , Princeton University Press, 1992

    1992

  64. [64]

    Local symmetries and constraints ,

    J. Lee and R. M. Wald, “Local symmetries and constraints ,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 31 (1990) 725–743. 75

    1990

  65. [65]

    Canonical Structure of Field Theories with Boundaries and Applications to Gauge Theories

    C. Troessaert, “Canonical Structure of Field Theories with Boundaries and Applications to Gauge Theories,” arXiv:1312.6427

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    Asymptotic symmetries of electromagnetism at spatial infinity

    M. Henneaux and C. Troessaert, “Asymptotic symmetries of electromagnetism at spatial infinity,” JHEP 05 (2018) 137, arXiv:1803.10194 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  67. [67]

    Symplectic reduction of Yang–Mills theory with boundaries: from superselection sectors to edge modes, and back,

    A. Riello, “Symplectic reduction of Yang–Mills theory with boundaries: from superselection sectors to edge modes, and back,” SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 125, arXiv:2010.15894. 76

    work page arXiv 2021