pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30466 · v1 · pith:Y7T2V3DAnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · ✦ hep-th

Holography and Kinematic Space for Gravitational Sub-regions in AdS

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 04:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords holographyAdSkinematic spacepartial entanglement entropytensor networksentanglement wedgesCrofton formulasurface-state correspondence
0
0 comments X

The pith

PEE threads from a codimension-one surface cover any subregion of vacuum AdS and support tensor networks for generalized entanglement wedges.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the known covering of a full AdS manifold by geodesics in kinematic space to the case of a generic subregion. It proposes that partial-entanglement-entropy threads emanating from a codimension-one surface perfectly cover the subregion, so that areas inside it are recovered by counting thread intersections via an extended Crofton formula. The authors then construct holographic tensor networks directly on this confined thread network. A reader would care because the construction supplies an explicit geometric realization of the surface-state correspondence and of generalized entanglement wedges when the region itself carries gravitational degrees of freedom.

Core claim

In vacuum AdS, the geodesics of the kinematic space associated with a generic subregion can be chosen to emanate from a codimension-one surface and still provide a perfect covering of that subregion. The area of any codimension-one surface inside the subregion is then given by the number of intersections with these threads, and the resulting thread network admits a tensor-network construction that realizes both the surface-state correspondence and the generalized entanglement wedges for gravitational subregions.

What carries the argument

Partial-entanglement-entropy (PEE) threads: the geodesics in the kinematic space of the subregion that emanate from a codimension-one surface and serve as the covering elements for area computations and tensor-network construction.

If this is right

  • Areas of surfaces inside the subregion equal the counted intersections with the confined PEE threads.
  • Tensor networks built on the thread network reproduce the entanglement structure of the gravitational subregion.
  • The surface-state correspondence holds for the subregion via the thread network.
  • Generalized entanglement wedges are realized by the minimal surfaces constructed within the same network.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same thread construction might supply a discrete model for subregion holography that can be simulated numerically without reference to the full bulk.
  • If the covering property survives when the ambient geometry is deformed away from vacuum AdS, the framework would extend to dynamical gravitational subregions.
  • The thread network supplies a geometric picture that could be compared directly with other thread-based or bit-thread proposals for entanglement in curved space.

Load-bearing premise

That the PEE threads starting from a codimension-one surface can perfectly cover a generic subregion rather than only the full manifold.

What would settle it

Select a concrete subregion and a test surface inside it, explicitly draw the proposed emanating PEE threads, and verify whether their intersection count with the test surface exactly equals the area for multiple choices of subregion and surface.

read the original abstract

It is well-known in integral geometry that a maximally symmetric Riemannian manifold, such as a static slice of vacuum AdS spacetime, can be perfectly covered by the geodesics in the Kinematic space, which we call the partial-entanglement-entropy (PEE) threads. In this context, the area of a codimension-one surface in the manifold can be computed by counting its intersections with the PEE threads, which is the celebrated Crofton formula. In this paper, we analyze the Kinematic space for a generic subregion in vacuum AdS space, and propose that the PEE threads emanate from a co-dimension one surface can perfectly cover a subregion in the manifold. Furthermore, we build holographic tensor network models on the network of the PEE threads confined in a subregion, thereby providing a concrete framework that realizes the surface-state correspondence and the generalized entanglement wedges for gravitational subregions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes the kinematic space associated to a generic subregion of vacuum AdS, proposes that partial-entanglement-entropy (PEE) threads (geodesics) emanating from a codimension-one surface perfectly cover the subregion, and constructs holographic tensor networks on the resulting thread network. This construction is claimed to realize the surface-state correspondence and generalized entanglement wedges for gravitational subregions, extending the Crofton formula and integral-geometry covering known for the full manifold.

Significance. If the covering property holds exactly, the work supplies a concrete geometric framework for building tensor-network models of holographic entanglement in subregions, which could strengthen the link between kinematic space, integral geometry, and tensor-network realizations of the surface-state correspondence. The absence of free parameters in the underlying Crofton construction for the full manifold is a positive feature that would carry over if the subregion extension is parameter-free.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / proposal statement] The central claim that PEE threads emanating from a codimension-one surface perfectly cover an arbitrary subregion (the direct extension of the full-manifold Crofton covering) is stated as a proposal but is not accompanied by an explicit derivation, explicit example, or verification that the covering is exact (no uncovered points, no overcounting). This covering is load-bearing for the subsequent tensor-network construction and the claimed realizations of the surface-state correspondence and generalized entanglement wedges.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for PEE threads versus ordinary geodesics should be introduced once and used consistently; the abstract uses both 'PEE threads' and 'geodesics in the Kinematic space' without clarifying the distinction for subregions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for identifying this key point about the central proposal. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract / proposal statement] The central claim that PEE threads emanating from a codimension-one surface perfectly cover an arbitrary subregion (the direct extension of the full-manifold Crofton covering) is stated as a proposal but is not accompanied by an explicit derivation, explicit example, or verification that the covering is exact (no uncovered points, no overcounting). This covering is load-bearing for the subsequent tensor-network construction and the claimed realizations of the surface-state correspondence and generalized entanglement wedges.

    Authors: We agree that the covering property is introduced as a proposal extending the known Crofton formula, motivated by our kinematic-space analysis for subregions, but the manuscript does not supply an explicit derivation or a concrete example confirming exact coverage (no gaps or overcounting). This is a valid observation, as the load-bearing nature of the claim for the tensor-network and surface-state correspondence sections would benefit from such verification. We will add an explicit example (e.g., a hemispherical subregion with direct computation of thread intersections) in the revised manuscript to demonstrate the covering property. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: central proposal is explicitly framed as an extension rather than a derived result.

full rationale

The paper states the known Crofton formula for full-manifold coverage by PEE threads and then explicitly proposes the subregion extension as a new claim after analyzing kinematic space. No load-bearing step reduces a 'prediction' or 'result' to a fitted input, self-citation, or definitional renaming; the tensor-network constructions are built on top of the stated proposal. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as the integral-geometry Crofton formula.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based solely on abstract; no free parameters, invented entities, or additional axioms beyond the stated well-known integral-geometry fact are identifiable.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption A maximally symmetric Riemannian manifold such as a static slice of vacuum AdS can be perfectly covered by the geodesics in the Kinematic space
    Explicitly stated as well-known in integral geometry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5683 in / 1169 out tokens · 62660 ms · 2026-06-30T04:59:15.317257+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 43 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J. M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252, [hep-th/9711200]

  2. [2]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105–114, [hep-th/9802109]

  3. [3]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291, [hep-th/9802150]

  4. [4]

    Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from AdS/CFT

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 181602, [hep-th/0603001]

  5. [5]

    Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy,JHEP08(2006) 045, [hep-th/0605073]

  6. [6]

    Generalized gravitational entropy

    A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena,Generalized gravitational entropy,JHEP08(2013) 090, [1304.4926]

  7. [7]

    V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi,A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal,JHEP07(2007) 062, [0705.0016]

  8. [8]

    X. Dong, A. Lewkowycz and M. Rangamani,Deriving covariant holographic entanglement, JHEP11(2016) 028, [1607.07506]

  9. [9]

    Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy

    T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena,Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy,JHEP11(2013) 074, [1307.2892]

  10. [10]

    Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime

    N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall,Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,JHEP01(2015) 073, [1408.3203]

  11. [11]

    Comments on quantum gravity and entanglement

    M. Van Raamsdonk,Comments on quantum gravity and entanglement,0907.2939

  12. [12]

    Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,Gen

    M. Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,Gen. Rel. Grav.42 (2010) 2323–2329, [1005.3035]

  13. [13]

    Rangamani and T

    M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi,Holographic Entanglement Entropy, vol. 931. Springer, 2017, 10.1007/978-3-319-52573-0

  14. [14]

    B. Chen, B. Czech and Z.-z. Wang,Quantum information in holographic duality,Rept. Prog. Phys.85(2022) 046001, [2108.09188]

  15. [15]

    A hole-ographic spacetime

    V. Balasubramanian, B. D. Chowdhury, B. Czech, J. de Boer and M. P. Heller,Bulk curves from boundary data in holography,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 086004, [1310.4204]

  16. [16]

    Holographic Holes and Differential Entropy

    M. Headrick, R. C. Myers and J. Wien,Holographic Holes and Differential Entropy,JHEP 10(2014) 149, [1408.4770]

  17. [17]

    Holographic Reconstruction of General Bulk Surfaces

    B. Czech, X. Dong and J. Sully,Holographic Reconstruction of General Bulk Surfaces,JHEP 11(2014) 015, [1406.4889]

  18. [18]

    Nuts and Bolts for Creating Space

    B. Czech and L. Lamprou,Holographic definition of points and distances,Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 106005, [1409.4473]

  19. [19]

    Integral Geometry and Holography

    B. Czech, L. Lamprou, S. McCandlish and J. Sully,Integral Geometry and Holography, JHEP10(2015) 175, [1505.05515]

  20. [20]

    Tensor Networks from Kinematic Space

    B. Czech, L. Lamprou, S. McCandlish and J. Sully,Tensor Networks from Kinematic Space, JHEP07(2016) 100, [1512.01548]. – 26 –

  21. [21]

    Gravitational Dynamics From Entanglement "Thermodynamics"

    N. Lashkari, M. B. McDermott and M. Van Raamsdonk,Gravitational dynamics from entanglement ’thermodynamics’,JHEP04(2014) 195, [1308.3716]

  22. [22]

    Gravitation from Entanglement in Holographic CFTs

    T. Faulkner, M. Guica, T. Hartman, R. C. Myers and M. Van Raamsdonk,Gravitation from Entanglement in Holographic CFTs,JHEP03(2014) 051, [1312.7856]

  23. [23]

    Entanglement Renormalization and Holography

    B. Swingle,Entanglement Renormalization and Holography,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 065007, [0905.1317]

  24. [24]

    Tensor network states and geometry

    G. Evenbly and G. Vidal,Tensor network states and geometry,J. Stat. Phys.145(2011) 891–918, [1106.1082]

  25. [25]

    Entanglement renormalization for quantum fields

    J. Haegeman, T. J. Osborne, H. Verschelde and F. Verstraete,Entanglement Renormalization for Quantum Fields in Real Space,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 100402, [1102.5524]

  26. [26]

    Constructing holographic spacetimes using entanglement renormalization

    B. Swingle,Constructing holographic spacetimes using entanglement renormalization, 1209.3304

  27. [27]

    Exact holographic mapping and emergent space-time geometry

    X.-L. Qi,Exact holographic mapping and emergent space-time geometry,1309.6282

  28. [28]

    Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence

    F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow and J. Preskill,Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence,JHEP06(2015) 149, [1503.06237]

  29. [29]

    Holographic duality from random tensor networks

    P. Hayden, S. Nezami, X.-L. Qi, N. Thomas, M. Walter and Z. Yang,Holographic duality from random tensor networks,JHEP11(2016) 009, [1601.01694]

  30. [30]

    Exploring the Tensor Networks/AdS Correspondence

    A. Bhattacharyya, Z.-S. Gao, L.-Y. Hung and S.-N. Liu,Exploring the Tensor Networks/AdS Correspondence,JHEP08(2016) 086, [1606.00621]

  31. [31]

    Tensor network and ($p$-adic) AdS/CFT

    A. Bhattacharyya, L.-Y. Hung, Y. Lei and W. Li,Tensor network and (p-adic) AdS/CFT, JHEP01(2018) 139, [1703.05445]

  32. [32]

    Bit threads and holographic entanglement

    M. Freedman and M. Headrick,Bit threads and holographic entanglement,Commun. Math. Phys.352(2017) 407–438, [1604.00354]

  33. [33]

    Headrick, J

    M. Headrick, J. Held and J. Herman,Crossing Versus Locking: Bit Threads and Continuum Multiflows,Commun. Math. Phys.396(2022) 265–313, [2008.03197]

  34. [34]

    Headrick and V

    M. Headrick and V. E. Hubeny,Covariant bit threads,JHEP07(8, 2023) 180, [2208.10507]

  35. [35]

    Fine structure in holographic entanglement and entanglement contour

    Q. Wen,Fine structure in holographic entanglement and entanglement contour,Phys. Rev. D 98(2018) 106004, [1803.05552]

  36. [36]

    Wen,Formulas for Partial Entanglement Entropy,Phys

    Q. Wen,Formulas for Partial Entanglement Entropy,Phys. Rev. Res.2(2020) 023170, [1910.10978]

  37. [37]

    Wen,Entanglement contour and modular flow from subset entanglement entropies,JHEP 05(2020) 018, [1902.06905]

    Q. Wen,Entanglement contour and modular flow from subset entanglement entropies,JHEP 05(2020) 018, [1902.06905]

  38. [38]

    Han and Q

    M. Han and Q. Wen,Entanglement entropy from entanglement contour: higher dimensions, SciPost Phys. Core5(2022) 020, [1905.05522]

  39. [39]

    Holographic entanglement contour, bit threads, and the entanglement tsunami

    J. Kudler-Flam, I. MacCormack and S. Ryu,Holographic entanglement contour, bit threads, and the entanglement tsunami,J. Phys. A52(2019) 325401, [1902.04654]

  40. [40]

    Towards the generalized gravitational entropy for spacetimes with non-Lorentz invariant duals

    Q. Wen,Towards the generalized gravitational entropy for spacetimes with non-Lorentz invariant duals,JHEP01(2019) 220, [1810.11756]

  41. [41]

    R. Abt, J. Erdmenger, M. Gerbershagen, C. M. Melby-Thompson and C. Northe,Holographic Subregion Complexity from Kinematic Space,JHEP01(2019) 012, [1805.10298]. – 27 –

  42. [42]

    Rolph,Local measures of entanglement in black holes and CFTs,SciPost Phys.12(2022) 079, [2107.11385]

    A. Rolph,Local measures of entanglement in black holes and CFTs,SciPost Phys.12(2022) 079, [2107.11385]

  43. [43]

    Han and Q

    M. Han and Q. Wen,First law and quantum correction for holographic entanglement contour,SciPost Phys.11(2021) 058, [2106.12397]

  44. [44]

    Lin, J.-R

    Y.-Y. Lin, J.-R. Sun and J. Zhang,Deriving the PEE proposal from the locking bit thread configuration,JHEP10(2021) 164, [2105.09176]

  45. [45]

    D. S. Ageev,Shaping contours of entanglement islands in BCFT,JHEP03(2022) 033, [2107.09083]

  46. [46]

    Lin,Distilled density matrices of holographic partial entanglement entropy from thread-state correspondence,Phys

    Y.-Y. Lin,Distilled density matrices of holographic partial entanglement entropy from thread-state correspondence,Phys. Rev. D108(5, 2023) 106010, [2305.02895]

  47. [47]

    Wen,Balanced Partial Entanglement and the Entanglement Wedge Cross Section,JHEP 04(2021) 301, [2103.00415]

    Q. Wen,Balanced Partial Entanglement and the Entanglement Wedge Cross Section,JHEP 04(2021) 301, [2103.00415]

  48. [48]

    H. A. Camargo, P. Nandy, Q. Wen and H. Zhong,Balanced partial entanglement and mixed state correlations,SciPost Phys.12(2022) 137, [2201.13362]

  49. [49]

    Wen and H

    Q. Wen and H. Zhong,Covariant entanglement wedge cross-section, balanced partial entanglement and gravitational anomalies,SciPost Phys.13(2022) 056, [2205.10858]

  50. [50]

    Basu,Balanced Partial Entanglement in Flat Holography,2203.05491

    D. Basu,Balanced Partial Entanglement in Flat Holography,2203.05491

  51. [51]

    D. Basu, J. Lin, Y. Lu and Q. Wen,Ownerless island and partial entanglement entropy in island phases,SciPost Phys.15(2023) 227, [2305.04259]

  52. [52]

    J. Lin, Y. Lu and Q. Wen,Cutoff brane vs the Karch-Randall brane: the fluctuating case, JHEP06(2024) 017, [2312.03531]

  53. [53]

    J. Lin, Y. Lu and Q. Wen,Geometrizing the partial entanglement entropy: from PEE threads to bit threads,JHEP2024(2024) 191, [2311.02301]

  54. [54]

    J. Lin, Y. Lu, Q. Wen and Y. Zhong,Weaving the AdS spaces with partial-entanglement-entropy threads,Class. Quant. Grav.43(2026) 055014, [2401.07471]

  55. [55]

    Q. Wen, M. Xu and H. Zhong,Holographic Tensor Networks as Tessellations of Geometry, 2512.19452

  56. [56]

    L. A. Santaló,Integral geometry and geometric probability. Cambridge university press, 2004

  57. [57]

    A Stereoscopic Look into the Bulk

    B. Czech, L. Lamprou, S. McCandlish, B. Mosk and J. Sully,A Stereoscopic Look into the Bulk,JHEP07(2016) 129, [1604.03110]

  58. [58]

    Remarks on the entanglement entropy for disconnected regions

    H. Casini and M. Huerta,Remarks on the entanglement entropy for disconnected regions, JHEP03(2009) 048, [0812.1773]

  59. [59]

    D. Basu, A. Chandra and Q. Wen,To appear

  60. [60]

    Bousso and G

    R. Bousso and G. Penington,Entanglement wedges for gravitating regions,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 086002, [2208.04993]

  61. [61]

    Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy

    H. Casini, M. Huerta and R. C. Myers,Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy,JHEP05(2011) 036, [1102.0440]

  62. [62]

    Surface/State Correspondence as a Generalized Holography

    M. Miyaji and T. Takayanagi,Surface/State Correspondence as a Generalized Holography, PTEP2015(2015) 073B03, [1503.03542]. – 28 –

  63. [63]

    cMERA as Surface/State Correspondence in AdS/CFT

    M. Miyaji, T. Numasawa, N. Shiba, T. Takayanagi and K. Watanabe,Continuous Multiscale Entanglement Renormalization Ansatz as Holographic Surface-State Correspondence,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 171602, [1506.01353]

  64. [64]

    B. Chen, L. Chen and C.-Y. Zhang,Surface/state correspondence andTTdeformation, Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 106011, [1907.12110]

  65. [65]

    Bao and G

    N. Bao and G. Suer,Holographic entanglement distillation from the surface state correspondence,JHEP01(2024) 091, [2311.07649]

  66. [66]

    Valence Bond Solids for Quantum Computation

    F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac,Valence-bond states for quantum computation,Phys. Rev. A70 (2004) 060302, [quant-ph/0311130]

  67. [67]

    Bousso and G

    R. Bousso and G. Penington,Holograms in our world,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 046007, [2302.07892]

  68. [68]

    S. Kaya, P. Rath and K. Ritchie,Hollow-grams: generalized entanglement wedges from the gravitational path integral,JHEP09(2025) 032, [2506.10064]

  69. [69]

    Generalized Entanglement Wedges and the Connected Wedge Theorem

    A. Arayath and S. Pasterski,Generalized Entanglement Wedges and the Connected Wedge Theorem,2604.22612

  70. [70]

    Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox

    G. Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,JHEP09 (2020) 002, [1905.08255]

  71. [71]

    The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield,The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,JHEP12(2019) 063, [1905.08762]

  72. [72]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini,The entropy of Hawking radiation,Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) 035002, [2006.06872]. – 29 –