pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30858 · v1 · pith:OW7GYEMDnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · physics.chem-ph

Carbon encapsulation of levitated Au nanoparticles

Joyce E. Coppock , Sunghyun Kim , B.E. Kane This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 01:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall physics.chem-ph
keywords gold nanoparticleslevitated particlesgraphene layerevaporation barrierlaser heatingsurface catalysisquadrupole ion trapmass measurement
0
0 comments X

The pith

Levitated gold nanoparticles acquire a graphene-like carbon barrier during repeated laser heating in vacuum.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how ~200 nm Au particles levitated in a quadrupole ion trap develop an evaporation barrier when exposed to repeated 532 nm laser pulses in high vacuum. Precision charge-to-mass ratio measurements show a slow mass increase over time, attributed to growth of a surface layer, followed by rapid mass loss upon O2 exposure after CO, consistent with graphene formation and oxidation. The formation rate shows no dependence on pressures of added carbon gases such as CO, C2H4, or CO2. This leads to the hypothesis that a rare surface state on the Au catalyzes carbon uptake, with laser heating required to enable diffusion or generate fresh states for continued layer growth.

Core claim

When levitated nanoscale Au particles are repeatedly heated with 532 nm laser pulses in high vacuum, they develop a barrier to evaporation observed as a slow mass increase. For particles exposed to CO, subsequent O2 exposure causes rapid mass decrease. These findings are consistent with growth and oxidation of a graphene layer on the Au. The rate of barrier formation does not depend on the pressure of carbon-containing gases added to the chamber. The authors hypothesize that a rare surface state on the solid Au particle catalyzes the reaction introducing C, with repeated laser pulse heating necessary to enable diffusion away from this state or to create fresh states allowing continued C upta

What carries the argument

A rare surface state on the solid Au particle that catalyzes carbon introduction, with repeated laser pulse heating required to enable diffusion or create fresh states for growth of the surface graphene layer.

If this is right

  • The barrier forms and thickens independently of the pressure of added carbon-containing gases.
  • Oxidation by O2 exposure removes the barrier and permits rapid subsequent evaporation.
  • Repeated laser heating is required to sustain carbon uptake beyond what occurs in the initial exposure period.
  • The process occurs in high vacuum even without deliberate addition of carbon gases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same levitation and laser-heating method could be applied to other metals to test whether similar rare surface states enable carbon encapsulation.
  • If the catalytic states are defects or specific facets, particle preparation or size distribution might be used to control barrier growth rate.
  • The technique isolates surface processes from substrate effects, allowing cleaner tests of vacuum surface catalysis on nanoparticles.

Load-bearing premise

The slow mass increase and rapid mass loss upon O2 exposure are caused by formation and oxidation of a graphene barrier layer rather than adsorption of contaminants, charge loss, or changes in particle shape.

What would settle it

Finding that mass changes continue at the same rate when all carbon-containing gases are eliminated from the chamber, or that O2 exposure produces no mass loss after barrier acquisition, would contradict the graphene-layer interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30858 by B.E. Kane, Joyce E. Coppock, Sunghyun Kim.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Proposed mechanism for preparation of a clean surface on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Mass, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Behavior of an Au nanoparticle during a long series of pulses and quiescent periods. Large mass loss occurs only during the heating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. High resolution behavior of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Effect of re-exposure to O [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Proposed reaction pathway for formation of a C barrier [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the formation of a barrier to evaporation that develops when levitated nanoscale Au nanoparticles are exposed to pulses of 532 nm laser radiation in a high vacuum (pressure $p=10^{-8}-10^{-7}$ Torr) environment. Our data are derived from precision measurements of the charge to mass ratio ($Q/M$) of $\sim$200 nm diameter Au particles confined in a quadrupole ion trap. We characterize the development of the barrier over time as the particle is repeatedly heated with laser pulses and determine the impact of variations of the interval between pulses and of exposure to several gases added to the vacuum chamber. We observe a slow increase in the mass of particles upon prolonged exposure to the vacuum, which we attribute to the growth of a barrier layer. For particles that have acquired a barrier during exposure to CO, we observe a rapid decrease in their mass upon subsequent exposure to O$_2$. These findings are consistent with the growth and subsequent oxidation of a graphene layer on the Au that forms the barrier to evaporation. However, we have not found that the rate of formation of the barrier depends on the pressure of carbon-containing gases (CO, C$_2$H$_4$, CO$_2$) we have added to the chamber. We hypothesize that a rare surface state on the solid Au particle catalyzes the reaction that introduces C to the particle. Repeated laser pulse heating is necessary--either to enable diffusion away from this state or to create fresh states that allow continued C uptake--to facilitate the growth of the surface graphene layer.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper reports precision Q/M measurements on ~200 nm levitated Au nanoparticles in a quadrupole ion trap under high vacuum (10^{-8}-10^{-7} Torr). Repeated 532 nm laser pulses produce a slow mass increase attributed to growth of a graphene barrier layer; subsequent O2 exposure after CO exposure produces rapid mass loss attributed to oxidation of that layer. The formation rate shows no dependence on added carbon-gas pressures (CO, C2H4, CO2), leading to the hypothesis that a rare surface catalytic state on solid Au, activated by laser pulsing, supplies the carbon.

Significance. If the attribution of the observed Q/M shifts to reversible graphene encapsulation holds, the result would demonstrate a laser-enabled surface-state mechanism for carbon uptake on Au that is independent of ambient carbon-gas pressure, with potential implications for nanoparticle passivation and vacuum surface chemistry. The work provides high-precision, time-resolved mass tracking in a levitated-particle platform, but the central claim rests on consistency arguments rather than direct structural verification or exclusion of alternatives.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph) and main text: the claim that slow mass gain followed by rapid O2-induced loss reflects growth and oxidation of a graphene barrier is load-bearing for the surface-state catalysis hypothesis, yet no spectroscopy, Raman, or post-experiment imaging is reported to confirm the layer is graphitic carbon rather than other adsorbates.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the reported absence of dependence on added CO/C2H4/CO2 pressures directly contradicts the expectation that carbon uptake should be limited by gas-phase carbon supply; this forces the ad-hoc invocation of a 'rare surface state' whose activity requires laser pulsing, but no independent test (e.g., varying pulse energy or repetition rate while holding pressure fixed) is described to support that mechanism.
  3. Throughout: Q/M changes can arise from charge-state jumps or altered effective potential due to particle shape/charge distribution without net mass change; the manuscript presents no controls (e.g., simultaneous charge monitoring, shape imaging, or trap-parameter variation) to exclude these alternatives to the mass-increase interpretation.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the pressure range but does not specify the typical number of particles or total observation time per particle; adding these details would clarify the statistical basis of the reported trends.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting these important points regarding the strength of our interpretations. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph) and main text: the claim that slow mass gain followed by rapid O2-induced loss reflects growth and oxidation of a graphene barrier is load-bearing for the surface-state catalysis hypothesis, yet no spectroscopy, Raman, or post-experiment imaging is reported to confirm the layer is graphitic carbon rather than other adsorbates.

    Authors: We agree that the identification of the layer as graphitic carbon rests on consistency with the observed mass dynamics and gas-exposure responses rather than direct structural evidence. The manuscript already qualifies the claim with 'consistent with' and 'we hypothesize,' but we will revise the abstract and relevant sections to further emphasize the interpretive nature of the attribution, explicitly note the absence of spectroscopic confirmation, and discuss alternative adsorbates as possible explanations. This is a genuine limitation of the present study, which prioritizes in-situ mass tracking over ex-situ characterization. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the reported absence of dependence on added CO/C2H4/CO2 pressures directly contradicts the expectation that carbon uptake should be limited by gas-phase carbon supply; this forces the ad-hoc invocation of a 'rare surface state' whose activity requires laser pulsing, but no independent test (e.g., varying pulse energy or repetition rate while holding pressure fixed) is described to support that mechanism.

    Authors: The pressure independence is the central experimental result that motivates the rare-surface-state hypothesis; the data show that mass gain requires repeated laser pulsing even when carbon-containing gases are present. We did vary the interval between pulses (affecting effective repetition rate) at fixed pressure and observed corresponding changes in uptake rate. We did not, however, perform a dedicated scan of pulse energy at constant pressure and repetition rate. We will revise the text to clarify the existing pulse-interval data, better motivate why the surface-state picture follows from the observations, and note the suggested pulse-energy test as a valuable direction for future work rather than claiming it has already been done. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [—] Throughout: Q/M changes can arise from charge-state jumps or altered effective potential due to particle shape/charge distribution without net mass change; the manuscript presents no controls (e.g., simultaneous charge monitoring, shape imaging, or trap-parameter variation) to exclude these alternatives to the mass-increase interpretation.

    Authors: We attribute the gradual, reversible Q/M shifts to mass change because they correlate specifically with laser exposure history and subsequent gas exposures (slow gain, rapid O2-induced loss) in a manner that would be coincidental for charge jumps. In our quadrupole trap, charge on these particles is typically stable between deliberate charging events. Nevertheless, the referee correctly notes the lack of explicit controls. In revision we will add a dedicated paragraph discussing charge stability in the trap, the reproducibility of the trends across multiple particles, and why alternative explanations are less parsimonious, while acknowledging that direct controls (e.g., independent charge monitoring or in-situ imaging) were not performed. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational attribution of mass changes to hypothesized graphene layer

full rationale

The paper reports direct Q/M measurements on levitated Au particles under laser pulsing and gas exposure. Slow mass increase is attributed to barrier growth and rapid O2-induced loss to oxidation, but this is an interpretive hypothesis grounded in external physical expectations about evaporation barriers rather than any equation, fit, or derivation that reduces to the data by construction. No self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or ansatze appear in the provided text. The lack of dependence on added carbon-gas pressure is explicitly noted and leads to an open hypothesis about rare surface states, without any mathematical loop. The derivation chain is self-contained as experimental observation plus physical interpretation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on interpreting Q/M shifts exclusively as mass changes due to carbon uptake, plus the post-hoc introduction of an undetected surface catalyst to explain pressure independence; no free parameters are fitted in the reported data, but two invented entities are required.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Changes in measured Q/M reflect changes in particle mass while charge remains constant
    Invoked throughout the abstract when converting Q/M data into statements about mass increase and barrier growth.
invented entities (2)
  • rare surface state on solid Au particle no independent evidence
    purpose: catalyzes introduction of carbon to the particle
    Postulated to explain why barrier formation rate is independent of added carbon-gas pressures
  • graphene layer on Au no independent evidence
    purpose: forms the evaporation barrier and is oxidizable by O2
    Invoked to unify the slow mass gain and rapid mass loss observations

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5809 in / 1563 out tokens · 43120 ms · 2026-07-01T01:26:44.848110+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kane, B. E. , title =. 2010 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.82.115441 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.115441 2010

  2. [2]

    and Kane,B

    Nagornykh,Pavel and Coppock,Joyce E. and Kane,B. E. , title =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  3. [3]

    2017 , month =

    Optical and magnetic measurements of gyroscopically stabilized graphene nanoplatelets levitated in an ion trap , author =. 2017 , month =

    2017

  4. [4]

    Coppock and Pavel Nagornykh and Jacob P

    Joyce E. Coppock and Pavel Nagornykh and Jacob P. J. Murphy and I. S. McAdams and Saimouli Katragadda and B. E. Kane , journal =. Dual-trap system to study charged graphene nanoplatelets in high vacuum , volume =. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  5. [5]

    Optical Trapping and Optical Micromanipulation XV

    Optical Trapping and Optical Micromanipulation XV. Optical Trapping and Optical Micromanipulation XV

  6. [6]

    Coppock and I

    Joyce E. Coppock and I. S. McAdams and Jacob P. J. Murphy and Samuel Klueter and José Hannan and B. E. Kane , title =. Optical Trapping and Optical Micromanipulation XV, Proceedings of SPIE , editor =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  7. [7]

    Kane , keywords =

    Joyce Coppock and Quinn Waxter and José Hannan and Samuel Klueter and B.E. Kane , keywords =. High temperature measurements of levitated gold nanospheres derived from gold suspensions , journal =. 2021 , issn =. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107645 , note =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107645 2021

  8. [8]

    , year =

    Coppock, Joyce and Waxter, Quinn and Wolle, Robert and Kane, B.E. , year =. Observation of undercooling in a levitated nanoscale liquid. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c04014 , note =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c04014

  9. [9]

    and Howder, Collin R

    Bell, David M. and Howder, Collin R. and Johnson, Ryan C. and Anderson, Scott L. , title =. 2014 , doi =

    2014

  10. [10]

    and Roukes, M

    Buks, E. and Roukes, M. L. , journal =. Stiction, adhesion energy, and the. 2001 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.63.033402 , note =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.63.033402 2001

  11. [12]

    Soft-landing and optical characterization of a preselected single fluorescent particle on a tapered optical fiber , volume =

    Markus Gregor and Alexander Kuhlicke and Oliver Benson , journal =. Soft-landing and optical characterization of a preselected single fluorescent particle on a tapered optical fiber , volume =. 2009 , doi =

    2009

  12. [13]

    and Campbell, Charles T

    Hemmingson, Stephanie L. and Campbell, Charles T. , title =. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  13. [15]

    Ion optics with electrostatic lenses

    Hinterberger, F. Ion optics with electrostatic lenses. CAS - CERN Accelerator School: Small Accelerators, Zeegse, The Netherlands 24 May - 2 Jun 2005. 2006. doi:10.5170/CERN-2006-012

    work page doi:10.5170/cern-2006-012 2005

  14. [16]

    and Abel, Bernd and Asmis, Knut R

    Hoffmann, Benjamin and Esser, Tim K. and Abel, Bernd and Asmis, Knut R. , title =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  15. [17]

    Asmis , title =

    Benjamin Hoffmann and Sophia Leippe and Knut R. Asmis , title =. 2024 , publisher =. doi:10.1080/00268976.2023.2210454 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1080/00268976.2023.2210454 2024

  16. [18]

    and Long, Bryan A

    Howder, Collin R. and Long, Bryan A. and Gerlich, Dieter and Alley, Rex N. and Anderson, Scott L. , title =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  17. [19]

    and Poschinger, Ulrich G

    Jacob, Georg and Groot-Berning, Karin and Wolf, Sebastian and Ulm, Stefan and Couturier, Luc and Dawkins, Samuel T. and Poschinger, Ulrich G. and Schmidt-Kaler, Ferdinand and Singer, Kilian , year =. Transmission microscopy with nanometer resolution using a deterministic single ion source , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.043001 , note =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.043001

  18. [21]

    and Robson, Simon G

    Jakob, Alexander M. and Robson, Simon G. and Schmitt, Vivien and Mourik, Vincent and Posselt, Matthias and Spemann, Daniel and Johnson, Brett C. and Firgau, Hannes R. and Mayes, Edwin and McCallum, Jeffrey C. and Morello, Andrea and Jamieson, David N. , year =. Deterministic shallow dopant implantation in silicon with detection confidence upper-bound to 9...

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202103235

  19. [22]

    2015 , doi =

    Kuhlicke, Alexander and Rylke, Antonio and Benson, Oliver , title =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  20. [23]

    and Rodriguez, Daniel J

    Lau, Chris Y. and Rodriguez, Daniel J. and Friese, Abigail M. and Anderson, Scott L. , title = ". 2023 , month =. doi:10.1063/5.0143948 , note =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0143948 2023

  21. [24]

    , year =

    Reiser, Alain and Schuh, Christopher A. , year =. Microparticle impact testing at high precision, higher temperatures, and with lithographically patterned projectiles , volume =. doi:10.1002/sia.3592 , note =

    work page doi:10.1002/sia.3592

  22. [25]

    and Schell, Andreas W

    Ricci, Francesco and Cuairan, Marc T. and Schell, Andreas W. and Hebestreit, Erik and Rica, Raúl A. and Meyer, Nadine and Quidant, Romain , title =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  23. [26]

    and Lau, Chris Y

    Rodriguez, Daniel J. and Lau, Chris Y. and Friese, Abigail M. and Long, Bryan A. and Anderson, Scott L. , title =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  24. [27]

    and Spiecker, H

    Schönhense, G. and Spiecker, H. , title = ". 2002 , month =. doi:10.1116/1.1523373 , note =

    work page doi:10.1116/1.1523373 2002

  25. [28]

    Focusing a deterministic single-ion beam , volume =

    Schnitzler, Wolfgang and Jacob, Georg and Fickler, Robert and Schmidt-Kaler, Ferdinand and Singer, Kilian , year =. Focusing a deterministic single-ion beam , volume =. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/6/065023 , note =

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/6/065023

  26. [29]

    and Munuera-Javaloy, C

    Tobalina, A. and Munuera-Javaloy, C. and Torrontegui, E. and Muga, J.G. and Casanova, J. , year =. Tailored ion beam for precise colour centre creation , volume =. doi:10.1098/rsta.2021.0271 , note =

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2021.0271 2021

  27. [30]

    Physical Review E , volume =

    Li, Zhigang and Wang, Hai , title =. Physical Review E , volume =. 2003 , month =

    2003

  28. [31]

    and Kane, B

    Coppock, Joyce E. and Kane, B. E. , title =. 2024 , month =

    2024

  29. [32]

    2022 , volume =

    Lu, Chen-Hsuan and Shang, Kuang-Ming and Lee, Shi-Ri and Tai, Yu-Chong and Yeh, Nai-Chang , title =. 2022 , volume =. doi:10.1021/acsanm.2c00401 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1021/acsanm.2c00401 2022

  30. [33]

    2012 , doi =

    Wu, Junchi and Shi, Wenwu and Chopra, Nitin , title =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  31. [34]

    2018 , issn =

    Manipulating the functionalization surface of graphene-encapsulated gold nanoparticles with single-walled carbon nanotubes for SERS sensing , journal =. 2018 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.068 , author =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.068 2018

  32. [35]

    1993 , issn =

    How to fill or empty a graphitic onion , journal =. 1993 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(93)87208-K , author =

    work page doi:10.1016/0009-2614(93)87208-k 1993

  33. [36]

    and Wilson, Robert J

    Wi, Jung-Sub and Barnard, Edward S. and Wilson, Robert J. and Zhang, Mingliang and Tang, Mary and Brongersma, Mark L. and Wang, Shan X. , title =. ACS Nano , volume =. 2011 , doi =

    2011

  34. [37]

    Kolar-Hofer, Pauline and Zampini, Giulia and Derntl, Christian Georg and Soprano, Enrica and Polo, Ester and del Pino, Pablo and Kereyeva, Nurgul and Eggeling, Moritz and Breth, Leoni and Haslinger, Michael J. and M. Fabrication of nanoparticles with precisely controllable plasmonic properties for biomedical applications , journal =. 2025 , volume =. doi:...

    work page doi:10.1039/d4nr02677b 2025

  35. [38]

    Nano Letters , volume =

    Ju, Peng and Jin, Yuanbin and Shen, Kunhong and Duan, Yao and Xu, Zhujing and Gao, Xingyu and Ni, Xingjie and Li, Tongcang , title =. Nano Letters , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  36. [39]

    , title =

    Hung, Wei Hsuan and Aykol, Mehmet and Valley, David and Hou, Wenbo and Cronin, Stephen B. , title =. 2010 , doi =

    2010

  37. [40]

    , title =

    Hung, Wei Hsuan and Hsu, I-Kai and Bushmaker, Adam and Kumar, Rajay and Theiss, Jesse and Cronin, Stephen B. , title =. 2008 , doi =

    2008

  38. [41]

    and Balci, Osman and Salihoglu, Omer and Kocabas, Coskun , title =

    Oznuluer, Tuba and Pince, Ercag and Polat, Emre O. and Balci, Osman and Salihoglu, Omer and Kocabas, Coskun , title =. 2011 , month =

    2011

  39. [42]

    , title =

    Xu, Kun and Ye, Peide D. , title =. 2014 , doi =

    2014

  40. [43]

    and Borensztein, Yves

    Watkins, William L. and Borensztein, Yves. Mechanism of hydrogen adsorption on gold nanoparticles and charge transfer probed by anisotropic surface plasmon resonance. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017. doi:10.1039/C7CP04843B

    work page doi:10.1039/c7cp04843b 2017

  41. [44]

    and Cheng, Jin and Lassiter, J

    Mukherjee, Shaunak and Libisch, Florian and Large, Nicholas and Neumann, Oara and Brown, Lisa V. and Cheng, Jin and Lassiter, J. Britt and Carter, Emily A. and Nordlander, Peter and Halas, Naomi J. , title =. 2013 , doi =

    2013

  42. [45]

    and Large, Nicolas and Ayala-Orozco, Ciceron and Zhang, Yu and Nordlander, Peter and Halas, Naomi J

    Mukherjee, Shaunak and Zhou, Linan and Goodman, Amanda M. and Large, Nicolas and Ayala-Orozco, Ciceron and Zhang, Yu and Nordlander, Peter and Halas, Naomi J. , title =. 2014 , doi =

    2014

  43. [46]

    2024 , doi =

    Ultrahigh quality factor of a levitated nanomechanical oscillator , author =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  44. [47]

    Kane, B. E. and Coppock, Joyce E. and Kim, Sunghyun and Westgate, Sarah , title =. 2026 , eprint =

    2026

  45. [48]

    Kim, Sunghyun and Coppock, Joyce and Kane, B. E. , title =. 2026 , note =

    2026

  46. [49]

    Coppock, Joyce and Kim, Sunghyun, and Westgate, Sarah and Kane, B. E. , title =. 2026 , note =

    2026

  47. [50]

    Nano Letters , volume =

    Takagi, Daisuke and Kobayashi, Yoshihiro and Hibino, Hiroki and Suzuki, Satoru and Homma, Yoshikazu , title =. Nano Letters , volume =. 2008 , doi =

    2008

  48. [51]

    Friese and Audrey R

    Abigail M. Friese and Audrey R. Burrows and Scott L. Anderson , abstract =. High and ultra-high temperature reaction kinetics by single nanoparticle mass spectrometry , journal =. 2025 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2025.117435 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2025.117435 2025

  49. [52]

    Rodriguez and Chris Y

    Daniel J. Rodriguez and Chris Y. Lau and Bryan A. Long and Susanna An Tang and Abigail M. Friese and Scott L. Anderson , keywords =. O2-oxidation of individual graphite and graphene nanoparticles in the 1200–2200. 2021 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.10.053 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2020.10.053 2021

  50. [53]

    and Lau, Chris Y

    Long, Bryan A. and Lau, Chris Y. and Rodriguez, Daniel J. and Tang, Susanna An and Anderson, Scott L. , title =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  51. [54]

    2019 , month =

    Terasawa, Tomo-o and Taira, Takanobu and Yasuda, Satoshi and Obata, Seiji and Saiki, Koichiro and Asaoka, Hidehito , title =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.7567/1347-4065/ab19ae , url =

    work page doi:10.7567/1347-4065/ab19ae 2019

  52. [55]

    C. B. Alcock and V. P. Itkin and M. K. Horrigan , title =. 1984 , publisher =. doi:10.1179/cmq.1984.23.3.309 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1179/cmq.1984.23.3.309 1984

  53. [56]

    , title =

    Song, Xiaowei and Lyu, Lecheng and Xu, Jinheng and Xing, Dong and Zhang, Xinxing and Zare, Richard N. , title =

  54. [57]

    and Wood, Ian G

    Pamato, Martha G. and Wood, Ian G. and Dobson, David P. and Hunt, Simon A. and Vo c adlo, Lidunka. The thermal expansion of gold: point defect concentrations and pre-melting in a face-centred cubic metal. Journal of Applied Crystallography. 2018. doi:10.1107/S1600576718002248 , url =

    work page doi:10.1107/s1600576718002248 2018

  55. [58]

    , title =

    Kar, Moumita and Schatz, George C. , title =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  56. [59]

    V. S. Gerasimov and A. E. Ershov and A. P. Gavrilyuk and S. V. Karpov and H. Suppression of surface plasmon resonance in. 2016 , url =. doi:10.1364/OE.24.026851 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.24.026851 2016

  57. [60]

    and Remediakis, Ioannis N

    Barmparis, Georgios D. and Remediakis, Ioannis N. , journal =. Dependence on. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.86.085457 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.085457 2012

  58. [61]

    2024 , month =

    Role of oxygen in laser-induced contamination at diamond-vacuum interfaces , author =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.024067 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.22.024067 2024