pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31317 · v1 · pith:GGYJLXHLnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.comp-ph

Full-Wave Green's-Function Modeling of Collective Single-Photon Emission in Non-Markovian Open-System QED with Finite-Bandwidth Compensation of Dispersive Interactions

Hyunwoo Choi , Jisang Seo , Junwoo Gim , Bowoo Jang , Weng C. Chew , Dong-Yeop Na This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 05:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.comp-ph
keywords Green's functionnon-Markovian QEDsingle-photon emissioncollective emissionopen quantum systemsfinite-bandwidth truncationdispersive interactionsLangevin noise formalism
0
0 comments X

The pith

Green's function equations track collective single-photon emission without Markovian approximations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a full-wave Green's function approach to describe how multiple quantum emitters embedded in complex electromagnetic structures collectively emit single photons. It starts from a transverse modal completeness relation in the modified Langevin noise formalism and derives a closed set of coupled equations that govern both emitter population dynamics and frequency-resolved field amplitudes in the single-excitation regime. Because the electromagnetic reservoir remains explicit, the dynamics of the emitted photon stay inside the same equations rather than requiring a Markovian approximation or tracing out the bath. A counter-term compensation scheme corrects systematic errors in coherent dispersive interactions that appear when the spectral density is truncated to finite bandwidth while leaving the retained non-Markovian memory kernel unchanged. The framework is demonstrated on benchmark cases and on a three-dimensional dispersive ring-resonator structure solved by finite-element methods.

Core claim

Starting from a transverse modal completeness relation of modified Langevin noise formalism, the authors derive a closed set of coupled equations for population dynamics and frequency-resolved field amplitudes in the single-excitation regime. The emitted single-photon dynamics can be modeled within the same closed set of equations without Markovian approximation in open and dissipative environments. Finite-bandwidth truncation of the spectral density produces systematic deviations in coherent dispersive interactions even when dissipative rates appear converged; a counter-term compensation scheme restores the missing dispersive contributions without modifying the retained non-Markovian memory

What carries the argument

Closed set of coupled equations for population dynamics and frequency-resolved field amplitudes, derived from the transverse modal completeness relation and augmented by a counter-term compensation scheme.

If this is right

  • Collective coherent energy exchange and single-photon radiation can be simulated directly in open dissipative electromagnetic structures.
  • Finite-element or other full-wave electromagnetic solvers can be incorporated into non-Markovian multi-emitter QED calculations.
  • Population dynamics and emitted field amplitudes remain coupled at every frequency without requiring a separate reservoir tracing step.
  • The same equation set applies from simple benchmark geometries to three-dimensional dispersive resonators.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach may extend naturally to structures whose spectral density requires adaptive bandwidth truncation during simulation.
  • Because the field amplitudes are retained explicitly, the method could be combined with detection models that resolve photon arrival statistics.
  • The compensation scheme isolates dispersive corrections, suggesting it could be applied to other non-Markovian master-equation truncations that suffer similar bandwidth artifacts.

Load-bearing premise

A counter-term compensation scheme can restore missing dispersive contributions from finite-bandwidth truncation without modifying the retained non-Markovian memory kernel.

What would settle it

A numerical comparison, in a known solvable geometry, between the compensated and uncompensated equations showing that dispersive interaction strengths match the exact result only after the counter-term is added while dissipative rates remain unchanged.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31317 by Bowoo Jang, Dong-Yeop Na, Hyunwoo Choi, Jisang Seo, Junwoo Gim, Weng C. Chew.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic of the proposed multi-emitter Green’s-function formulation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic of the finite-bandwidth compensation scheme. The retained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Free-space verification of the finite-bandwidth compensation scheme. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Finite-bandwidth truncation in a structured electromagnetic environ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Ring-resonator emitter configurations used in the numerical examples. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Bandwidth-dependent population dynamics in the ring-resonator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Collective eigenmode spectra of the ring-resonator emitter configura [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Full-spectrum dynamics at the ring resonance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Two-emitter single-photon amplitude at t = 1 ps. The normalized field distribution is compared for λ0 = 648.5 nm and λ0 = 736 nm. The upper and lower rows correspond to the close and distant two-emitter configurations with C(0) = [1, 1]T / √ 2 and C(0) = [1, −1]T / √ 2, respectively. consistent with its strongly suppressed collective decay rate. This time-resolved spatial map thus directly connects the co… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Four-emitter collective dynamics at the ring resonance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Four-emitter single-photon amplitude at the ring resonance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This work presents a full-wave Green's function framework for modeling collective and coherent single-photon emission from multiple quantum emitters embedded in complex electromagnetic structures. Starting from a transverse modal completeness relation of modified Langevin noise formalism, we derive a closed set of coupled equations for population dynamics and frequency-resolved field amplitudes in the single-excitation regime. Since the electromagnetic reservoir is not traced out at the level of the dynamical amplitudes, the emitted single-photon dynamics can be modeled within the same closed set of equations without Markovian approximation in open and dissipative environments. We demonstrate that finite-bandwidth truncation of the spectral density leads to systematic deviations in coherent dispersive interactions, even when dissipative rates appear converged. To restore causal consistency, we introduce a counter-term compensation scheme that restores the missing dispersive contributions without modifying the retained non-Markovian memory kernel. To validate the scheme and demonstrate the practicality of the proposed framework, we present numerical examples ranging from benchmark configurations to a three-dimensional dispersive ring-resonator structure via finite element method. These capabilities provide a practical route for rigorously incorporating full-wave electromagnetic simulations into non-Markovian multi-emitter quantum electrodynamics, enabling predictive modeling of collective emission, coherent energy exchange, and single-photon radiation in realistic open structures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a full-wave Green's-function framework for collective single-photon emission from multiple quantum emitters in complex electromagnetic structures. Starting from a transverse modal completeness relation in the modified Langevin noise formalism, it derives a closed set of coupled equations for single-excitation population dynamics and frequency-resolved field amplitudes without tracing out the reservoir or invoking the Markov approximation. Finite-bandwidth truncation of the spectral density is shown to produce systematic errors in dispersive interactions; a counter-term compensation scheme is introduced to restore the missing dispersive contributions while leaving the retained non-Markovian memory kernel unchanged. Numerical examples, including a 3-D dispersive ring-resonator structure solved via finite-element methods, are presented to validate the approach.

Significance. If the counter-term scheme is shown to preserve the memory kernel and modal completeness without feedback into the field equations, the framework would allow direct incorporation of full-wave electromagnetic simulations into non-Markovian multi-emitter QED. This would be a useful advance for predictive modeling of collective emission and coherent energy exchange in realistic open structures.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / compensation-scheme derivation] Abstract and the section introducing the counter-term compensation scheme: the central claim that the added counter-term restores dispersive contributions 'without modifying the retained non-Markovian memory kernel' is load-bearing for the entire construction. No explicit operator identity, commutation relation, or step-by-step derivation is supplied demonstrating that the counter-term leaves the modal completeness relation, the memory integral, and causality in the single-excitation manifold unchanged. Without this, it is impossible to verify that the compensation does not implicitly alter the frequency-resolved field equations or reintroduce the very truncation artifacts it is meant to cancel.
  2. [Derivation of closed equations] The derivation of the closed set of equations for population dynamics and field amplitudes (starting from the transverse modal completeness relation): the manuscript states that the electromagnetic reservoir is not traced out, yet the provided text supplies no intermediate steps showing how the single-excitation manifold remains closed once the counter-term is inserted. An explicit check that the added term does not couple back into the retained non-Markovian kernel is required.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Notation] Notation for the frequency-resolved field amplitudes and the precise definition of the finite-bandwidth truncation should be introduced with an equation number at first use to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We agree that additional explicit derivations would strengthen the presentation of the counter-term scheme and the closure of the single-excitation manifold. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / compensation-scheme derivation] Abstract and the section introducing the counter-term compensation scheme: the central claim that the added counter-term restores dispersive contributions 'without modifying the retained non-Markovian memory kernel' is load-bearing for the entire construction. No explicit operator identity, commutation relation, or step-by-step derivation is supplied demonstrating that the counter-term leaves the modal completeness relation, the memory integral, and causality in the single-excitation manifold unchanged. Without this, it is impossible to verify that the compensation does not implicitly alter the frequency-resolved field equations or reintroduce the very truncation artifacts it is meant to cancel.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript lacks a fully expanded operator-level derivation of the counter-term properties. In the revised version we will add a dedicated appendix (or subsection) that supplies the explicit commutation relations, the operator identity showing preservation of the transverse modal completeness relation, and the step-by-step verification that the counter-term restores the missing dispersive shift while leaving the retained non-Markovian memory kernel and causality unchanged in the single-excitation manifold. This will also include a direct check confirming no feedback into the frequency-resolved field equations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Derivation of closed equations] The derivation of the closed set of equations for population dynamics and field amplitudes (starting from the transverse modal completeness relation): the manuscript states that the electromagnetic reservoir is not traced out, yet the provided text supplies no intermediate steps showing how the single-excitation manifold remains closed once the counter-term is inserted. An explicit check that the added term does not couple back into the retained non-Markovian kernel is required.

    Authors: We agree that the intermediate algebraic steps demonstrating manifold closure after insertion of the counter-term are not shown explicitly. The revised manuscript will expand the derivation section to include these steps, beginning from the transverse modal completeness relation, inserting the counter-term, and verifying that the single-excitation subspace remains closed with no additional coupling into the retained memory kernel. This will be presented both formally and with a brief numerical consistency check on a simple benchmark. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation builds from external completeness relation and introduces independent compensation.

full rationale

The paper explicitly starts from the transverse modal completeness relation of the modified Langevin noise formalism as an input and derives the closed coupled equations for population dynamics and field amplitudes in the single-excitation regime. The counter-term scheme is presented as a new construction to restore dispersive terms without modifying the retained kernel, with no quoted equations or reductions showing that any output is equivalent to an input by definition, that a fitted quantity is relabeled as a prediction, or that a load-bearing premise collapses to a self-citation chain. The framework remains self-contained against external benchmarks because the starting relation is treated as given and the new scheme is not shown to feed back into or redefine the modal completeness or memory kernel.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Framework rests on the transverse modal completeness relation from modified Langevin noise formalism and introduces a new compensation term whose independent validation is not shown.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption transverse modal completeness relation of modified Langevin noise formalism
    Explicitly stated as the starting point for deriving the coupled equations.
invented entities (1)
  • counter-term compensation scheme no independent evidence
    purpose: Restores missing dispersive contributions from finite-bandwidth truncation without altering the non-Markovian memory kernel
    Introduced in the abstract to address systematic deviations; no independent evidence provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5781 in / 1213 out tokens · 24738 ms · 2026-07-01T05:39:19.562337+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Quantum-dot-based deterministic photon–emitter interfaces for scalable photonic quantum technology,

    R. Uppu, L. Midolo, X. Zhou, J. Carolan, and P. Lodahl, “Quantum-dot-based deterministic photon–emitter interfaces for scalable photonic quantum technology,”Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1308–1317, Dec 2021. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-00965-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41565-021-00965-6 2021

  2. [2]

    Epitaxial quantum dots: a semiconductor launchpad for photonic quantum technologies,

    X. Zhou, L. Zhai, and J. Liu, “Epitaxial quantum dots: a semiconductor launchpad for photonic quantum technologies,”Photonics Insights, vol. 1, no. 2, p. R07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3788/ PI.2022.R07

    2023

  3. [3]

    Quantum emitters in 2d materials: Emitter engineering, photophysics, and integration in photonic nanostructures,

    M. Kianinia, Z.-Q. Xu, M. Toth, and I. Aharonovich, “Quantum emitters in 2d materials: Emitter engineering, photophysics, and integration in photonic nanostructures,”Applied Physics Reviews, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 011306, 01 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0072091

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0072091 2022

  4. [4]

    Integration of color centers into silicon photonic structures,

    H. Quard, S. Cueff, H. S. Nguyen, N. Chauvin, and T. Wood, “Integration of color centers into silicon photonic structures,”Applied Physics Reviews, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 041326, 12 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0258819

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0258819 2025

  5. [5]

    Long-range cooperative resonances in rare-earth ion arrays inside photonic resonators,

    D. Pak, A. Nandi, M. Titze, E. S. Bielejec, H. Alaeian, and M. Hosseini, “Long-range cooperative resonances in rare-earth ion arrays inside photonic resonators,”Commun. Phys., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 89, Apr. 2022

    2022

  6. [6]

    Quantum optical memory for entanglement distribution,

    Y . Lei, F. K. Asadi, T. Zhong, A. Kuzmich, C. Simon, and M. Hosseini, “Quantum optical memory for entanglement distribution,”Optica, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1511–1528, Nov 2023. [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/optica/abstract.cfm?URI=optica-10-11-1511

    2023

  7. [7]

    Colloquium: Cavity-enhanced quantum network nodes,

    A. Reiserer, “Colloquium: Cavity-enhanced quantum network nodes,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 94, p. 041003, Dec 2022. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.041003

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.041003 2022

  8. [8]

    Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the cooper pair box,

    J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the cooper pair box,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 76, p. 042319, Oct 2007. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042319

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042319 2007

  9. [9]

    The transmon qubit for electro- magnetics engineers: An introduction,

    T. E. Roth, R. Ma, and W. C. Chew, “The transmon qubit for electro- magnetics engineers: An introduction,”IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 8–20, 2023

    2023

  10. [10]

    Two-qubit silicon quantum processor with operation fidelity exceeding 99%,

    A. R. Mills, C. R. Guinn, M. J. Gullans, A. J. Sigillito, M. M. Feldman, E. Nielsen, and J. R. Petta, “Two-qubit silicon quantum processor with operation fidelity exceeding 99%,”Science Advances, vol. 8, no. 14, p. eabn5130, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/sciadv.abn5130

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn5130 2022

  11. [11]

    C. C. Gerry and P. L. Knight,Introductory Quantum Optics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2005

    2005

  12. [12]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002

    2002

  13. [13]

    Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes,

    R. H. Dicke, “Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes,” Phys. Rev., vol. 93, pp. 99–110, Jan 1954. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.93.99

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.93.99 1954

  14. [14]

    Radiation from ann-atom system. i. general formalism,

    R. H. Lehmberg, “Radiation from ann-atom system. i. general formalism,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 2, pp. 883–888, Sep 1970. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.2.883 PREPRINT 13

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.2.883 1970

  15. [15]

    Radiation from ann-atom system. ii. spontaneous emission from a pair of atoms,

    ——, “Radiation from ann-atom system. ii. spontaneous emission from a pair of atoms,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 2, pp. 889–896, Sep 1970. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.2.889

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.2.889 1970

  16. [16]

    Jin,The Finite Element Method in Electromagnetics, 3rd ed

    J.-M. Jin,The Finite Element Method in Electromagnetics, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-IEEE Press, 2014

    2014

  17. [17]

    Taflove and S

    A. Taflove and S. Hagness,Computational electrodynamics: the finite- difference time-domain method. 2nd ed. Artech House, 06 2000, vol. 67–106

    2000

  18. [18]

    Finite-difference time-domain methods,

    F. L. Teixeira, C. Sarris, Y . Zhang, D.-Y . Na, J.-P. Berenger, Y . Su, M. Okoniewski, W. C. Chew, V . Backman, and J. J. Simpson, “Finite-difference time-domain methods,”Nature Reviews Methods Primers, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 76, Oct 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-023-00268-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s43586-023-00268-1 2023

  19. [19]

    Colloquium: Simulating non-markovian dynamics in open quantum systems,

    M. Xu, V . Vadimov, J. T. Stockburger, and J. Ankerhold, “Colloquium: Simulating non-markovian dynamics in open quantum systems,”Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 98, p. 021002, May 2026. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/w3nw-hbjc

    work page doi:10.1103/w3nw-hbjc 2026

  20. [20]

    Numerically “exact

    Y . Tanimura, “Numerically “exact” approach to open quantum dynamics: The hierarchical equations of motion (heom),”The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 153, no. 2, p. 020901, 07 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0011599

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0011599 2020

  21. [21]

    An efficient julia framework for hierarchi- cal equations of motion in open quantum systems,

    Y .-T. Huang, P.-C. Kuo, N. Lambert, M. Cirio, S. Cross, S.-L. Yang, F. Nori, and Y .-N. Chen, “An efficient julia framework for hierarchi- cal equations of motion in open quantum systems,”Communications Physics, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 313, Oct 2023

    2023

  22. [22]

    Input-output hierarchical equations of motion,

    M. Cirio, P. Liang, and N. Lambert, “Input-output hierarchical equations of motion,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 112, p. 012211, Jul 2025. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/4q4p-z14x

    work page doi:10.1103/4q4p-z14x 2025

  23. [23]

    Nonperturbative treatment of non-markovian dynamics of open quantum systems,

    D. Tamascelli, A. Smirne, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, “Nonperturbative treatment of non-markovian dynamics of open quantum systems,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 120, p. 030402, Jan 2018. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120. 030402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120 2018

  24. [24]

    Generalized theory of pseudomodes for exact descriptions of non-markovian quantum processes,

    G. Pleasance, B. M. Garraway, and F. Petruccione, “Generalized theory of pseudomodes for exact descriptions of non-markovian quantum processes,”Phys. Rev. Res., vol. 2, p. 043058, Oct 2020. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043058

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.043058 2020

  25. [25]

    Quantization of quasinormal modes for open cavities and plasmonic cavity quantum electrodynamics,

    S. Franke, S. Hughes, M. K. Dezfouli, P. T. Kristensen, K. Busch, A. Knorr, and M. Richter, “Quantization of quasinormal modes for open cavities and plasmonic cavity quantum electrodynamics,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 122, p. 213901, May 2019

    2019

  26. [26]

    Quantum quasinormal mode theory for dissipative nano-optics and magnetodielectric cavity quantum electrodynamics,

    L. Meschede, D. D. A. Clarke, and O. Hess, “Quantum quasinormal mode theory for dissipative nano-optics and magnetodielectric cavity quantum electrodynamics,”APL Quantum, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 016103, 01

  27. [27]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0292776

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0292776

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0292776

  28. [28]

    Few-mode field quantization of arbitrary electromagnetic spectral densities,

    I. Medina, F. J. Garc ´ıa-Vidal, A. I. Fern´andez-Dom´ınguez, and J. Feist, “Few-mode field quantization of arbitrary electromagnetic spectral densities,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 126, p. 093601, Mar 2021. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.093601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.093601 2021

  29. [29]

    Few-mode field quantization for multiple emitters,

    M. S ´anchez-Barquilla, F. J. Garc ´ıa-Vidal, A. I. Fern ´andez-Dom´ınguez, and J. Feist, “Few-mode field quantization for multiple emitters,” Nanophotonics, vol. 11, no. 19, pp. 4363–4374, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2021-0795

    work page doi:10.1515/nanoph-2021-0795 2022

  30. [30]

    Macroscopic quantum electrodynamics – concepts and applications,

    S. Scheel and S. Y . Buhmann, “Macroscopic quantum electrodynamics – concepts and applications,”Acta Physica Slovaca, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 675–809, 2008

    2008

  31. [31]

    Green-function approach to the radiation- field quantization for homogeneous and inhomogeneous kramers-kronig dielectrics,

    T. Gruner and D.-G. Welsch, “Green-function approach to the radiation- field quantization for homogeneous and inhomogeneous kramers-kronig dielectrics,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 53, pp. 1818–1829, Mar 1996. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.53.1818

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.53.1818 1996

  32. [32]

    Canonical quantization of macroscopic electromag- netism,

    T. G. Philbin, “Canonical quantization of macroscopic electromag- netism,”New Journal of Physics, vol. 12, no. 12, p. 123008, dec 2010. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/12/123008

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/12/123008 2010

  33. [33]

    Mode expansion and photon operators in dispersive and absorbing dielectrics,

    O. D. Stefano, S. Savasta, and R. Girlanda, “Mode expansion and photon operators in dispersive and absorbing dielectrics,”Journal of Modern Optics, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 67–84, 2001

    2001

  34. [34]

    Quantizing polaritons in inhomogeneous dissipative systems,

    A. Drezet, “Quantizing polaritons in inhomogeneous dissipative systems,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 95, p. 023831, Feb 2017. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.023831

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.95.023831 2017

  35. [35]

    Numerical framework for modeling quantum electromagnetic systems involving finite-sized lossy dielectric objects in free space,

    D.-Y . Na, T. E. Roth, J. Zhu, W. C. Chew, and C. J. Ryu, “Numerical framework for modeling quantum electromagnetic systems involving finite-sized lossy dielectric objects in free space,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 107, p. 063702, Jun 2023. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.063702

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.107.063702 2023

  36. [36]

    Quantum electrodynamics of lossy magnetodielectric samples in vacuum: Modified langevin noise formalism,

    A. Ciattoni, “Quantum electrodynamics of lossy magnetodielectric samples in vacuum: Modified langevin noise formalism,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 110, p. 013707, Jul 2024. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.110.013707

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.110.013707 2024

  37. [37]

    Direct derivation of the modified Langevin noise formalism from the canonical quantization of macroscopic electromagnetism

    ——, “Direct derivation of the modified langevin noise formalism from the canonical quantization of macroscopic electromagnetism,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04336

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    Dissipative Channels Determine Open Electromagnetic Quantization

    H. Choi, J. Gim, T. E. Roth, W. C. Chew, and D.-Y . Na, “Dissipative channels determine open electromagnetic quantization,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08557

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    First order maxwell operator formalism for macroscopic quantum electrodynamics,

    I. Agarwal, A. Kundu, C. M. Lange, and J. D. Hood, “First order maxwell operator formalism for macroscopic quantum electrodynamics,”

  40. [40]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27475

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27475

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    Atom-field non-markovian dynamics in open and dissipative systems: An efficient memory-kernel approach linked to dyadic greens function and cem treatments,

    H. Choi, J. Seo, W. C. Chew, and D.-Y . Na, “Atom-field non-markovian dynamics in open and dissipative systems: An efficient memory-kernel approach linked to dyadic greens function and cem treatments,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03561

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Non-markovian analysis of atom-field interactions in dissipative electromagnetic environments,

    H. Choi, T. E. Roth, W. C. Chew, and D.-Y . Na, “Non-markovian analysis of atom-field interactions in dissipative electromagnetic environments,”Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 24, p. 044056, Oct 2025. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/kvxk-sp94

    work page doi:10.1103/kvxk-sp94 2025

  43. [43]

    Computational framework for non-Markovian multi-emitter dynamics beyond the single-excitation limit

    H. Choi, W. C. Chew, and D.-Y . Na, “Computational framework for non-markovian multi-emitter dynamics beyond the single-excitation limit,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02741

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  44. [44]

    Quantum emitter interacting with a dispersive dielectric object: a model based on the modified langevin noise formalism,

    G. Miano, L. M. Cangemi, and C. Forestiere, “Quantum emitter interacting with a dispersive dielectric object: a model based on the modified langevin noise formalism,”Nanophotonics, vol. 14, no. 23, pp. 4019–4027, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10. 1515/nanoph-2024-0703

    2025

  45. [45]

    Modified langevin noise formalism for multiple quantum emitters in dispersive electromagnetic environments out of equilibrium,

    ——, “Modified langevin noise formalism for multiple quantum emitters in dispersive electromagnetic environments out of equilibrium,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 113, p. 023720, Feb 2026. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ps9g-1b4d

    work page doi:10.1103/ps9g-1b4d 2026

  46. [46]

    Green’s dyadic, spectral function, local density of states, and fluctuation dissipation theorem,

    Q. D. Weng Cho Chew, Wei E. I. Sha, “Green’s dyadic, spectral function, local density of states, and fluctuation dissipation theorem,”Progress In Electromagnetics Research, vol. 166, pp. 147–165, 2019

    2019

  47. [47]

    Formal theory of quantum fluctuations from a driven state,

    M. Lax, “Formal theory of quantum fluctuations from a driven state,” Phys. Rev., vol. 129, pp. 2342–2348, Mar 1963. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.129.2342

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.129.2342 1963

  48. [48]

    Exact solution for ann-molecule— radiation-field hamiltonian,

    M. Tavis and F. W. Cummings, “Exact solution for ann-molecule— radiation-field hamiltonian,”Phys. Rev., vol. 170, pp. 379–384, Jun 1968. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.170.379

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.170.379 1968

  49. [50]

    Causality and the dispersion relation: Logical foundations,

    ——, “Causality and the dispersion relation: Logical foundations,” Phys. Rev., vol. 104, pp. 1760–1770, Dec 1956. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.104.1760

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.104.1760 1956

  50. [51]

    Broadband mid-infrared frequency comb generation in a si3n4 microresonator,

    K. Luke, Y . Okawachi, M. R. E. Lamont, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lipson, “Broadband mid-infrared frequency comb generation in a si3n4 microresonator,”Opt. Lett., vol. 40, no. 21, pp. 4823–4826, Nov

  51. [52]

    Available: https://opg.optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI= ol-40-21-4823

    [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI= ol-40-21-4823