pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31482 · v1 · pith:3BJOXTTLnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

A unified formalism for collinear and non-collinear approaches in the four-component Dirac-Kohn-Sham theory based on G-spinors

Giulia Gamboni , Loriano Storchi , Paola Belanzoni , Leonardo Belpassi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 02:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph
keywords four-component Dirac-Kohn-Shamnon-collinear density functional theoryG-spinorsopen-shell systemsmagnetization vectorH2 dissociationrelativistic DFTcollinear vs non-collinear
0
0 comments X

The pith

A unified four-component Dirac-Kohn-Sham formalism lets non-collinear canonical LDA reproduce unrestricted non-relativistic H2 dissociation without imposed broken symmetry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a single mathematical framework that treats both collinear and non-collinear approximations inside four-component relativistic density functional theory using G-spinor basis functions. This allows consistent comparison of different exchange-correlation schemes for molecules with unpaired electrons where spin-orbit effects matter. The authors implement collinear and canonical non-collinear versions and test them on simple hydride ions. They demonstrate that adding the magnetization vector to the non-collinear approach produces dissociation behavior for H2 that matches non-relativistic unrestricted calculations without forcing symmetry breaking. The unified formulation supports future stable implementations of non-collinear GGA functionals.

Core claim

The paper establishes a unified formulation of collinear and non-collinear approximations, encompassing both canonical and Scalmani-Frisch schemes, within the relativistic four-component DKS formalism based on G-spinor basis sets. Incorporating the magnetisation vector into the reformulated non-collinear canonical LDA approach enables a description of H2 dissociation that closely parallels unrestricted non-relativistic approaches, notably without explicitly imposing the broken symmetry solution as is often required in non-relativistic collinear calculations.

What carries the argument

the unified formalism for collinear and non-collinear approaches in four-component DKS theory based on G-spinors, with magnetization vector included in the canonical non-collinear LDA

If this is right

  • The formalism permits direct numerical comparison of collinear, canonical non-collinear, and Scalmani-Frisch schemes on identical systems.
  • The BERTHA code implementation now covers open-shell hydride molecules with significant spin-orbit coupling.
  • Non-collinear canonical LDA produces open-shell dissociation curves that align with unrestricted non-relativistic methods without requiring explicit symmetry breaking.
  • The same magnetization-vector treatment forms the foundation for stable non-collinear GGA functionals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach may simplify spin-density calculations for heavy-element open-shell species where both relativity and unpaired electrons are present.
  • It could reduce the need for manual symmetry-breaking steps in routine relativistic DFT work on radicals and transition-metal complexes.
  • Extending the magnetization inclusion beyond LDA to gradient-corrected functionals would test whether the parallelism holds for more accurate exchange-correlation forms.

Load-bearing premise

Extending the two-component unified approach to four-component G-spinor DKS preserves numerical stability and consistency for both canonical and Scalmani-Frisch non-collinear schemes without introducing new inconsistencies.

What would settle it

A direct numerical comparison in which the H2 dissociation curve obtained from the reformulated non-collinear canonical LDA deviates substantially in shape or energy from the corresponding unrestricted non-relativistic result would falsify the claimed parallelism.

read the original abstract

Non-collinear density functional theories were developed to extend the use of established collinear exchange-correlation functionals to systems with unpaired electrons in the presence of significant spin-orbit coupling. A comparison of different approaches and implementations is not straightforward, as the methods are often formulated using different fundamental variables and numerical approximations. A consistent review of the formal and numerical aspects of collinear and non-collinear schemes has recently been reported (Desmarais et al., J. Chem. Phys. 154, 204110 (2021)) in the context of two-component methods. In this work, we present an initial effort towards a unified formulation of collinear and non-collinear approximations, encompassing both canonical and Scalmani-Frisch schemes, within the relativistic four-component DKS formalism based on G-spinor basis sets. Our preliminary implementation of the collinear and canonical non-collinear formulations in the DKS module of the \texttt{BERTHA} code extends its applicability and provides a benchmark for a series of simple open-shell hydride molecules (namely, H$_2$X$^+$, with X = O, S, Se, Te, and Po). Finally, we show that incorporating the magnetisation vector into the reformulated non-collinear canonical LDA approach enables a description of H$_2$ dissociation - and open-shell systems more broadly - that closely parallels unrestricted non-relativistic approaches, notably without explicitly imposing the broken symmetry solution as is often required in non-relativistic collinear calculations. This unified formulation forms the basis for a rigorous comparison between different numerical approximations, which will be essential for obtaining stable results for the non-collinear GGA exchange-correlation functionals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a unified collinear/non-collinear formulation in four-component DKS using G-spinors, extending the 2021 two-component review by Desmarais et al. It reports a preliminary BERTHA implementation of the collinear and canonical non-collinear formulations, benchmarks on H2X+ (X=O,S,Se,Te,Po), and shows that the magnetisation-vector reformulation of canonical non-collinear LDA yields H2 dissociation curves that track unrestricted non-relativistic results without manual symmetry breaking.

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies a consistent framework for comparing collinear and non-collinear schemes in relativistic four-component DFT, which is valuable for open-shell systems with spin-orbit coupling. The H2 dissociation demonstration without imposed broken symmetry is a concrete strength that parallels non-relativistic unrestricted behavior. Credit is given for the explicit preliminary framing and deferral of GGA extensions, as well as the absence of internal contradictions in the variable choice, functional evaluation, and G-spinor matrix elements.

minor comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (or equivalent implementation section): the numerical stability claim for the four-component extension would be strengthened by explicit reporting of the convergence thresholds and grid parameters used in the H2X+ benchmarks, even if they match the two-component reference.
  2. [Figure 2] Figure 2 (H2 dissociation curves): the caption should state the precise functional (LDA variant) and whether the collinear reference is restricted or unrestricted, to allow direct comparison with the non-collinear result.
  3. The text introducing the Scalmani-Frisch scheme in the four-component G-spinor context is brief; a short paragraph clarifying how the two-component formulation maps without additional approximations would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the recognition of its contributions to a unified collinear/non-collinear framework in four-component DKS theory, and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were listed in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The manuscript extends the two-component review of Desmarais et al. (JCP 2021) by different authors to a new four-component DKS formulation using G-spinors. It introduces variable choices, functional evaluations, and matrix elements for collinear and non-collinear (canonical and Scalmani-Frisch) schemes, reports a BERTHA implementation, and benchmarks on H2X+ species plus H2 dissociation curves. No load-bearing step reduces by the paper's own equations to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the cited 2021 review is external and the central demonstration relies on explicit numerical results rather than construction. The work is presented as preliminary with no internal contradictions or renamed known results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides insufficient detail to identify specific free parameters or invented entities; the work relies on standard domain assumptions of Kohn-Sham DFT extended to the relativistic non-collinear case.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Collinear exchange-correlation functionals can be extended to non-collinear cases via the magnetization vector in the four-component DKS setting.
    This is the core premise enabling the unified formalism and the H2 dissociation result.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5851 in / 1305 out tokens · 57446 ms · 2026-07-01T02:43:00.215254+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Springer (2024)

    Easttom, C.: Hardware for Quantum Computing. Springer (2024). https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-031-66477-9 36

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-66477-9 2024

  2. [2]

    Science 370(6522), 1309–1312 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.abb9352

    Bayliss, S.L., Laorenza, D.W., Mintun, P.J., Kovos, B.D., Freedman, D.E., Awschalom, D.D.: Optically addressable molecular spins for quantum informa- tion processing. Science 370(6522), 1309–1312 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.abb9352

    2020

  3. [3]

    Journal of the American Chemical Society 143(50), 21350–21363 (2021)

    Laorenza, D.W., Kairalapova, A., Bayliss, S.L., Goldzak, T., Greene, S.M., Weiss, L.R., Deb, P., Mintun, P.J., Collins, K.A., Awschalom, D.D., Berkelbach, T.C., Freedman, D.E.: Tunable cr4+ molecular color centers. Journal of the American Chemical Society 143(50), 21350–21363 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    Bayliss, S.L., Deb, P., Laorenza, D.W., Onizhuk, M., Galli, G., Freedman, D.E., Awschalom, D.D.: Enhancing spin coherence in optically addressable molecular qubits through host-matrix control. Phys. Rev. X 12, 031028 (2022) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.031028

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.031028 2022

  5. [5]

    Journal of the American Chemical Society 147(24), 20693–20702 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c04004

    Baldinelli, L., Sorbelli, D., Toriyama, M., Bistoni, G., De Angelis, F., Galli, G.: Design rules to engineer the spin structure of cr4+ molecular qubits via matrix modularity. Journal of the American Chemical Society 147(24), 20693–20702 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c04004

    work page doi:10.1021/jacs.5c04004 2025

  6. [6]

    Chemical Reviews 124(4), 1950–1991 (2024)

    Bloom, B.P., Paltiel, Y., Naaman, R., Waldeck, D.H.: Chiral induced spin selectivity. Chemical Reviews 124(4), 1950–1991 (2024)

    1950

  7. [7]

    Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 29(10), 103002 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/aa54a4

    Michaeli, K., Varade, V., Naaman, R., Waldeck, D.H.: A new approach towards spintronics–spintronics with no magnets. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 29(10), 103002 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/aa54a4

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aa54a4 2017

  8. [8]

    Science 360(6395), 1331–1334 (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.aar4265

    Banerjee-Ghosh, K., Dor, O.B., Tassinari, F., Capua, E., Yochelis, S., Capua, A., Yang, S.-H., Parkin, S.S.P., Sarkar, S., Kronik, L., Baczewski, L.T., Naaman, R., Paltiel, Y.: Separation of enantiomers by their enantiospecific interaction with achiral magnetic substrates. Science 360(6395), 1331–1334 (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.aar4265

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aar4265 2018

  9. [9]

    In: Compu- tational Organometallic Chemistry, pp

    Harvey, J.N.: Spin-forbidden reactions in transition metal chemistry. In: Compu- tational Organometallic Chemistry, pp. 305–336. CRC Press, (2001)

    2001

  10. [10]

    new ideas and new computational challenges

    Poli, R., Harvey, J.N.: Spin forbidden chemical reactions of transition metal com- pounds. new ideas and new computational challenges. Chem. Soc. Rev. 32, 1–8 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1039/B200675H

    work page doi:10.1039/b200675h 2003

  11. [11]

    Chemistry – A European Journal 24(20), 5006–5015 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201704608 37

    Gaggioli, C.A., Belpassi, L., Tarantelli, F., Harvey, J.N., Belanzoni, P.: Spin- forbidden reactions: Adiabatic transition states using spin–orbit coupled density functional theory. Chemistry – A European Journal 24(20), 5006–5015 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201704608 37

    work page doi:10.1002/chem.201704608 2018

  12. [12]

    Inorganic Chemistry 58(11), 7345–7356 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00476

    Ricciarelli, D., Phung, Q.M., Belpassi, L., Harvey, J.N., Belanzoni, P.: Under- standing the reactivity of mn-oxo porphyrins for substrate hydroxylation: The- oretical predictions and experimental evidence reconciled. Inorganic Chemistry 58(11), 7345–7356 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00476

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00476 2019

  13. [13]

    Chem- istry – A European Journal 26(14), 3080–3089 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1002/ chem.201904314

    Ricciarelli, D., Belpassi, L., Harvey, J.N., Belanzoni, P.: Spin-forbidden reactivity of transition metal oxo species: Exploring the potential energy surfaces. Chem- istry – A European Journal 26(14), 3080–3089 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1002/ chem.201904314

    2020

  14. [14]

    Inorganic Chemistry 64(29), 15193–15205 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c02310

    Sorbelli, D., Belpassi, L., Belanzoni, P.: Mechanistic insights into molecular oxy- gen reactivity with late transition metal–hydride bonds. Inorganic Chemistry 64(29), 15193–15205 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c02310

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c02310 2025

  15. [15]

    International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 112(23), 3661–3684 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1002/qua

    Jacob, C.R., Reiher, M.: Spin in density-functional theory. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 112(23), 3661–3684 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1002/qua. 24309

    work page doi:10.1002/qua 2012

  16. [16]

    Journal of Computational Chemistry 23(8), 779–785 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.10043

    Wüllen, C.: Spin densities in two-component relativistic density functional cal- culations: Noncollinear versus collinear approach. Journal of Computational Chemistry 23(8), 779–785 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.10043

    work page doi:10.1002/jcc.10043 2002

  17. [17]

    Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 16(4), 2410–2429 (2020)

    De Santis, M., Storchi, L., Belpassi, L., Quiney, H.M., Tarantelli, F.: Pyberthart: A relativistic real-time four-component tddft implementation using prototyp- ing techniques based on python. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 16(4), 2410–2429 (2020)

    2020

  18. [18]

    In: Schwerdtfeger, P

    Engel, E.: Chapter 10 - relativistic density functional theory: Founda- tions and basic formalism. In: Schwerdtfeger, P. (ed.) Relativistic Electronic Structure Theory. Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, vol. 11, pp. 523–621. Elsevier, (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1380-7323(02)80036-X . https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138073230280036X

    work page doi:10.1016/s1380-7323(02)80036-x 2002

  19. [19]

    Desmarais, J.K., Bencheikh, K., Vignale, G., Pittalis, S.: Physical spin torques from exactly constrained exchange-correlation torques. Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 016403 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1103/lt1f-8pz2

    work page doi:10.1103/lt1f-8pz2 2026

  20. [20]

    Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics 18(3), 469 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4608/18/3/018

    Kubler, J., Hock, K.-H., Sticht, J., Williams, A.R.: Density functional theory of non-collinear magnetism. Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics 18(3), 469 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4608/18/3/018

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4608/18/3/018 1988

  21. [21]

    Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 8(7), 2193–2196 (2012)

    Scalmani, G., Frisch, M.J.: A new approach to noncollinear spin density func- tional theory beyond the local density approximation. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 8(7), 2193–2196 (2012)

    2012

  22. [22]

    Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 13(6), 2591–2603 (2017)

    Egidi, F., Sun, S., Goings, J.J., Scalmani, G., Frisch, M.J., Li, X.: Two-component noncollinear time-dependent spin density functional theory for excited state 38 calculations. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 13(6), 2591–2603 (2017)

    2017

  23. [23]

    Pu, Z., Li, H., Zhang, N., Jiang, H., Gao, Y., Xiao, Y., Sun, Q., Zhang, Y., Shao, S.: Noncollinear density functional theory. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013036 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013036

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.013036 2023

  24. [24]

    Rajagopal, A.K., Callaway, J.: Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. B 7, 1912–1919 (1973) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.7.1912

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.7.1912 1912

  25. [25]

    Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 11(24), 943 (1978)

    Rajagopal, A.K.: Inhomogeneous relativistic electron gas. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 11(24), 943 (1978)

    1978

  26. [26]

    Physical Review Letters 89(21), 213001 (2002) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.213001

    Anton, J., Jacob, T., Fricke, B., Engel, E.: Relativistic density functional calcu- lations for pt2. Physical Review Letters 89(21), 213001 (2002) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.213001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.213001 2002

  27. [27]

    Physical Review A 69, 012505 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.69.012505

    Anton, J., Jacob, T., Fricke, B., Engel: Relativistic density-functional theory for molecules: Noncollinear and collinear implementation of the dirac-kohn- sham equations. Physical Review A 69, 012505 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.69.012505

    2004

  28. [28]

    Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society 50(3B), 597–606 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1002/jccs.200300087

    Wang, F., Liu, W.: Comparison of different polarization schemes in open-shell rel- ativistic density functional calculations. Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society 50(3B), 597–606 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1002/jccs.200300087

    work page doi:10.1002/jccs.200300087 2003

  29. [29]

    International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 109(10), 2091–2112 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.22065 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qua.22065

    Bast, R., Jensen, H.J.A., Saue, T.: Relativistic adiabatic time- dependent density functional theory using hybrid functionals and noncollinear spin magnetization. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 109(10), 2091–2112 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.22065 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qua.22065

    work page doi:10.1002/qua.22065 2091

  30. [30]

    Molecular Physics 111(24), 3741–3755 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2013.785611 https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2013.785611

    Li, Z., Suo, B., Zhang, Y., Xiao, Y., Liu, W.: Combining spin- adapted open-shell td-dft with spin–orbit coupling. Molecular Physics 111(24), 3741–3755 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2013.785611 https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2013.785611

    work page doi:10.1080/00268976.2013.785611 2013

  31. [31]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics 151(18), 184111 (2019)

    Komorovsky, S., Cherry, P.J., Repisky, M.: Four-component relativistic time- dependent density-functional theory using a stable noncollinear dft ansatz applicable to both closed- and open-shell systems. The Journal of Chemical Physics 151(18), 184111 (2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    WIREs Computa- tional Molecular Science 8(1), 1340 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1340 https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wcms.1340 39

    Sun, Q., Berkelbach, T.C., Blunt, N.S., Booth, G.H., Guo, S., Li, Z., Liu, J., McClain, J.D., Sayfutyarova, E.R., Sharma, S., Wouters, S., Chan, G.K.-L.: Pyscf: the python-based simulations of chemistry framework. WIREs Computa- tional Molecular Science 8(1), 1340 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1340 https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.10...

    work page doi:10.1002/wcms.1340 2018

  33. [33]

    WIRES Comput

    Neese, F.: Software update: the orca program system, version 5.0. WIRES Comput. Molec. Sci. 12(5), 1606 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1606 https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wcms.1606

    work page doi:10.1002/wcms.1606 2022

  34. [34]

    Jour- nal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 12(15), 2977–2990 (1979) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0022-3719/12/15/007

    MacDonald, A.H., Vosko, S.H.: A relativistic density functional formalism. Jour- nal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 12(15), 2977–2990 (1979) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0022-3719/12/15/007

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3719/12/15/007 1979

  35. [35]

    Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

    Engel, E., Dreizler, R.M.: Density Functional Theory: An Advanced Course. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. Springer, (2011)

    2011

  36. [36]

    In: Liu, W

    Engel, E.: Relativistic density functional theory. In: Liu, W. (ed.) Handbook of Relativistic Quantum Chemistry. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2015)

    2015

  37. [37]

    Doctoral thesis, Technische Universität Berlin (2018)

    Gohr, S.: Fully relativistic calculations of epr and paramagnetic nmr parameters for heavy atom compounds. Doctoral thesis, Technische Universität Berlin (2018). https://doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-6647

    work page doi:10.14279/depositonce-6647 2018

  38. [38]

    Belpassi, L., Storchi, L., Quiney, H.M., Tarantelli, F.: Recent advances and per- spectives in four-component dirac–kohn–sham calculations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 12368–12394 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CP20569B

    work page doi:10.1039/c1cp20569b 2011

  39. [39]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics 152(16), 164118 (2020) https://doi.org/10

    Belpassi, L., De Santis, M., Quiney, H.M., Tarantelli, F., Storchi, L.: Bertha: Implementation of a four-component dirac–kohn–sham relativistic framework. The Journal of Chemical Physics 152(16), 164118 (2020) https://doi.org/10. 1063/5.0002831

    2020

  40. [41]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics 117(12), 5550–5563 (2002) https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.1502245

    Quiney, H.M., Belanzoni, P.: Relativistic density functional theory using gaussian basis sets. The Journal of Chemical Physics 117(12), 5550–5563 (2002) https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.1502245

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1502245 2002

  41. [42]

    Dyall, K.G., Fægri, K.: Kinetic balance and variational bounds failure in the solution of the Dirac equation in a finite Gaussian basis set. Chem. Phys. Lett. 174(1), 25–32 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(90)85321-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0009-2614(90)85321-3 1990

  42. [43]

    Quiney, H.M., Belanzoni, P.: Relativistic density functional theory using gaussian basis sets. J. Chem. Phys. 117(12), 5550–5563 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1063/ 1.1502245

    2002

  43. [44]

    Springer series on atomic, optical, and plasma physics

    Grant, I.P.: Relativistic Quantum Theory of Atoms and Molecules: Theory and Computation. Springer series on atomic, optical, and plasma physics. Springer, 40 Berlin (2007)

    2007

  44. [45]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics 88(4), 2547–2553 (1988) https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.454033

    Becke, A.D.: A multicenter numerical integration scheme for polyatomic molecules. The Journal of Chemical Physics 88(4), 2547–2553 (1988) https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.454033

    work page doi:10.1063/1.454033 1988

  45. [46]

    The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 91(7), 1–14 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/ e2018-90170-1

    Petrone, A., Williams-Young, D.B., Sun, S., Stetina, T.F., Li, X.: An efficient implementation of two-component relativistic density functional theory with torque-free auxiliary variables. The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 91(7), 1–14 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/ e2018-90170-1

    work page doi:10.1140/epjb/ 2018

  46. [47]

    SoftwareX 7, 1–5 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2017.11.002

    Lehtola, S., Steigemann, C., Oliveira, M.J.T., Marques, M.A.L.: Recent develop- ments in Libxc - A comprehensive library of functionals for density functional theory. SoftwareX 7, 1–5 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2017.11.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.softx.2017.11.002 2018

  47. [48]

    Journal of Chemical Physics 122 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1063/ 1.1897383

    Belpassi, L., Tarantelli, F., Sgamellotti, A., Quiney, H.M.: Computational strate- gies for a four-component dirac-kohn-sham program: Implementation and first applications. Journal of Chemical Physics 122 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1063/ 1.1897383

    2005

  48. [49]

    Peralta, J.E., Scuseria, G.E., Frisch, M.J.: Noncollinear magnetism in density functional calculations. Phys. Rev. B 75, 125119 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.75.125119

    2007

  49. [50]

    Desmarais, J.K., Komorovsky, S., Flament, J.-P., Erba, A.: Spin–orbit cou- pling from a two-component self-consistent approach. ii. non-collinear density functional theories. The Journal of Chemical Physics 154(20), 204110 (2021)

    2021

  50. [51]

    Capelle, K., Vignale, G., Györffy, B.L.: Spin currents and spin dynamics in time- dependent density-functional theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 206403 (2001) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.206403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.206403 2001

  51. [52]

    Eich, F.G., Pittalis, S., Vignale, G.: Transverse and longitudinal gradients of the spin magnetization in spin-density-functional theory. Phys. Rev. B 88, 245102 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.245102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.245102 2013

  52. [53]

    https://github

    Belpassi, L., Storchi, L.: BERTHA 4c-DKS group — github.com. https://github. com/BERTHA-4c-DKS

  53. [54]

    Zenodo, (2023)

    Dyall, K.G.: Dyall Dz, Tz, and Qz Basis Sets for Relativistic Electronic Structure Calculations. Zenodo, (2023). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7574629

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.7574629 2023

  54. [55]

    Pritchard, B.P., Altarawy, D., Didier, B., Gibsom, T.D., Windus, T.L.: A new basis set exchange: An open, up-to-date resource for the molecular sciences com- munity. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 59, 4814–4820 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs. jcim.9b00725 41

    work page doi:10.1021/acs 2019

  55. [56]

    Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 26(3), 376–385 (1930) https: //doi.org/10.1017/S030500410001610X

    Dirac, P.A.M.: Note on exchange phenomena in the Thomas atom. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 26(3), 376–385 (1930) https: //doi.org/10.1017/S030500410001610X

    work page doi:10.1017/s030500410001610x 1930

  56. [57]

    Perdew, J.P., Burke, K., Ernzerhof, M.: Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.77.3865

    1996

  57. [58]

    Journal of Chemical Physics 108, 4060–4069 (1998) https://doi

    Frank, I., Hutter, J., Marx, D., Parrinello, M.: Molecular dynamics in low-spin excited states. Journal of Chemical Physics 108, 4060–4069 (1998) https://doi. org/10.1063/1.475804

    work page doi:10.1063/1.475804 1998

  58. [59]

    Chemical Physics Letters 288(5), 689–697 (1998) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0009-2614(98)00364-9

    Filatov, M., Shaik, S.: Spin-restricted density functional approach to the open- shell problem. Chemical Physics Letters 288(5), 689–697 (1998) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0009-2614(98)00364-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0009-2614(98)00364-9 1998

  59. [60]

    Longman (1975) 42

    Tyldesley, J.R.: An Introduction to Tensor Analysis for Engineers and Applied Scientists. Longman (1975) 42

    1975