pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00199 · v1 · pith:L2F625MBnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn · physics.comp-ph

A High-Order Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian Discontinuous Galerkin Method for the Boltzmann Equation in Nearly Incompressible Flows

Atakan Aygun , Onur Ata , Tim Warburton , Ali Karakus This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 17:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn physics.comp-ph
keywords arbitrary Lagrangian-Euleriandiscontinuous GalerkinBoltzmann equationgeometric conservation lawmoving boundariesnearly incompressible flowshigh-order methods
0
0 comments X

The pith

An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian discontinuous Galerkin discretization of the Boltzmann equation satisfies the geometric conservation law for nearly incompressible flows with moving boundaries.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian version of the Galerkin-Boltzmann formulation to simulate nearly incompressible flows with moving boundaries. The continuous Boltzmann equations are mapped to a reference state by adding an advection term that compensates for mesh motion. This mapped system is discretized in space with the discontinuous Galerkin method on unstructured meshes and advanced in time with a semi-analytic Runge-Kutta scheme. The resulting discretization is shown to satisfy the geometric conservation law through consistent updates of the geometric factors. Validation cases include free-stream preservation, a moving Taylor-Green vortex, a plunging airfoil in two dimensions, and a carangiform fish in three dimensions.

Core claim

Mapping the continuous Boltzmann equations to a reference state compensates mesh motion via an added advection term. When the resulting system is discretized with high-order discontinuous Galerkin on unstructured meshes and advanced with semi-analytic Runge-Kutta time integration, the scheme satisfies the geometric conservation law. Consistent update of geometric factors ensures this property holds, enabling the method to simulate nearly incompressible flows with moving boundaries on a GPU-accelerated implementation.

What carries the argument

The ALE mapping of the Boltzmann equations to a reference configuration that adds a compensating advection term, discretized by discontinuous Galerkin with consistent geometric-factor updates to enforce the geometric conservation law.

If this is right

  • Free-stream preservation holds exactly under mesh motion.
  • The moving Taylor-Green vortex test remains accurate.
  • A plunging symmetric airfoil can be simulated in two dimensions.
  • A moving carangiform fish can be simulated in three dimensions with perfectly matched layers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same reference-mapping approach could be applied to other kinetic models that share the same continuous structure.
  • High-order accuracy on unstructured meshes would support simulations of more complex three-dimensional geometries with arbitrary boundary motion.
  • The GPU kernel implementation suggests the method scales to larger problems where mesh motion is driven by external solvers.
  • The semi-analytic time integrator may reduce stiffness in other stiff kinetic problems with moving domains.

Load-bearing premise

Mapping the continuous Boltzmann equations to a reference state compensates mesh motion via an added advection term without introducing errors that violate the nearly incompressible assumption or the geometric conservation law on moving unstructured meshes.

What would settle it

A numerical experiment in which free-stream preservation fails to machine precision or the discrete geometric conservation law is violated when the mesh moves.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00199 by Ali Karakus, Atakan Aygun, Onur Ata, Tim Warburton.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the transformation of coordinate systems from the reference element [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The initial and final positions of the free stream preservation test case. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Kinetic energy and its dissipation rate for the moving 3D TGV. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Time evolution of drag coefficient of different cases. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Vortex structures behind the plunging airfoil. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Fish geometry and the surface mesh The mesh motion is prescribed in a purely explicit ALE form by updating only the z component of each mesh vertex, while keeping the streamwise and spanwise coordinates unchanged. We first define a clamped axial coordinate with the initial mesh positions (x0, y0, z0): x˜ = min 1, max(0, x0)  , and construct an effective distance to a rigid core of radius Rrigid via deff =… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Vortex structures behind the plunging airfoil. The vortical structures are visualized with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) form of the Galerkin-Boltzmann formulation for the simulation of nearly incompressible flows with moving boundaries. The continuous Boltzmann equations are mapped to a reference state to compensate the mesh motion with an advection term. The resulting system is discretized in space using the discontinuous Galerkin method on unstructured meshes. A semi-analytic Runge-Kutta time discretization is used to overcome the stiffness introduced by the continuous Boltzmann equations. The well-known geometric conservation law is shown to be satisfied by the time and space discretizations and consistent update of geometric factors of the discretization. The implementation is on the GPU accelerated kernel library libParanumal and validated by a free stream preservation and moving Taylor-Green vortex test cases. Then, the capabilities are shown using a plunging symmetric airfoil in two-dimensions and moving carangiform fish in three-dimensions using perfectly matched layers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops an arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) formulation of the Galerkin-Boltzmann equation for nearly incompressible flows on deforming domains. The continuous Boltzmann equation is mapped to a fixed reference element, introducing an additional advection term that accounts for mesh velocity. The resulting system is discretized in space with a high-order discontinuous Galerkin method on unstructured meshes and advanced in time with a semi-analytic Runge-Kutta integrator that treats the collision term exactly. The authors state that the geometric conservation law (GCL) is satisfied exactly when geometric factors are updated consistently with the spatial and temporal discretizations. Numerical evidence is provided via free-stream preservation, a moving Taylor-Green vortex, a plunging airfoil in 2-D, and a 3-D carangiform swimmer, all implemented in the GPU library libParanumal and employing perfectly matched layers at artificial boundaries.

Significance. If the GCL satisfaction and accuracy claims hold under the nearly incompressible regime, the work supplies a high-order, structure-preserving kinetic solver for moving-boundary problems that is directly relevant to low-Mach bio-fluid mechanics and fluid-structure interaction. The combination of ALE mapping, DG discretization, and semi-analytic time integration for the stiff collision operator is a concrete technical contribution, and the GPU implementation addresses a practical barrier to adoption. The test cases (plunging airfoil, swimming fish) are representative of the target applications.

minor comments (3)
  1. §3.2: the precise definition of the reference-element mapping and the resulting geometric factors (Jacobian, metric terms) should be written explicitly so that the GCL proof can be verified without ambiguity.
  2. Figure 4 (plunging airfoil): the caption and surrounding text should state the polynomial degree, number of elements, and time-step size used, together with a quantitative error measure relative to a fixed-mesh reference solution.
  3. §4.3: the treatment of the collision operator inside the semi-analytic RK stages is described only at a high level; a short derivation or pseudocode would clarify how the exact integration is combined with the ALE advection term.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were listed in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The derivation maps the Boltzmann equation to a reference frame via an added advection term, discretizes with standard DG on unstructured meshes, and applies semi-analytic RK time stepping. GCL satisfaction is verified through consistent geometric factor updates and standard test cases (free-stream preservation, moving Taylor-Green), following established ALE-DG practice without reducing any central claim to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or definitional equivalence. No load-bearing step collapses to its own inputs by construction; the approach is self-contained against external numerical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on standard mathematical properties of DG methods and ALE mappings; the core addition is the reference-state transformation whose validity is asserted rather than derived from first principles in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The geometric conservation law is satisfied by the time and space discretizations together with consistent update of geometric factors
    Explicitly stated as shown to hold for the chosen discretizations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5701 in / 1354 out tokens · 50977 ms · 2026-07-02T17:09:12.300123+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysiswithapplicationstoarterialbloodflow,

    Y. Bazilevs, V. M. Calo, Y. Zhang, and T. Hughes, “Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysiswithapplicationstoarterialbloodflow,”Computational Mechanics, vol.38, no.4, pp.310– 322, 2006

    2006

  2. [2]

    A conforming sliding mesh technique for an embedded- hybridized discontinuous Galerkin discretization for fluid-rigid body interaction,

    T. L. Horváth and S. Rhebergen, “A conforming sliding mesh technique for an embedded- hybridized discontinuous Galerkin discretization for fluid-rigid body interaction,”International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 94, no. 11, pp. 1784–1809, 2022

    2022

  3. [3]

    Discontinuous Galerkin solution of the Navier–Stokes equations on deformable domains,

    P. O. Persson, J. Bonet, and J. Peraire, “Discontinuous Galerkin solution of the Navier–Stokes equations on deformable domains,”Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 198, no. 17, pp. 1585–1595, 2009

    2009

  4. [4]

    Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin methods for incom- pressible flow with moving boundaries and interfaces,

    G. Fu, “Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin methods for incom- pressible flow with moving boundaries and interfaces,”Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 367, p. 113158, 2020

    2020

  5. [5]

    A bound-preserving and positivity-preserving high-order arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian discontinuous Galerkin method for compressible multi-medium flows,

    F. Zhang and J. Cheng, “A bound-preserving and positivity-preserving high-order arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian discontinuous Galerkin method for compressible multi-medium flows,”SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, pp. B254–B279, 2024

    2024

  6. [6]

    A fictitious domain ap- proach to the direct numerical simulation of incompressible viscous flow past moving rigid bodies: application to particulate flow,

    R. Glowinski, T.-W. Pan, T. I. Hesla, D. D. Joseph, and J. Periaux, “A fictitious domain ap- proach to the direct numerical simulation of incompressible viscous flow past moving rigid bodies: application to particulate flow,”Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 169, no. 2, pp. 363–426, 2001

    2001

  7. [7]

    A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing,

    N. Moës, J. Dolbow, and T. Belytschko, “A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing,”International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 131– 150, 1999

    1999

  8. [8]

    The immersed boundary method,

    C. S. Peskin, “The immersed boundary method,”Acta numerica, vol. 11, pp. 479–517, 2002

    2002

  9. [9]

    An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian computing method for all flow speeds,

    C. W. Hirt, A. A. Amsden, and J. Cook, “An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian computing method for all flow speeds,”Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 227–253, 1974. 17

    1974

  10. [10]

    Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element formula- tion for incompressible viscous flows,

    T. J. R. Hughes, W. K. Liu, and T. K. Zimmermann, “Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element formula- tion for incompressible viscous flows,”Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 329–349, 1981

    1981

  11. [11]

    A discontinuous Galerkin ALE method for compressible viscous flows in moving domains,

    I. Lomtev, R. M. Kirby, and G. E. Karniadakis, “A discontinuous Galerkin ALE method for compressible viscous flows in moving domains,”Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 128–159, 1999

    1999

  12. [12]

    Perspective on the geometric conservation law and finite element methods for ALE simulations of incompressible flow,

    S. Étienne, A. Garon, and D. Pelletier, “Perspective on the geometric conservation law and finite element methods for ALE simulations of incompressible flow,”Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 228, no. 7, pp. 2313–2333, 2009

    2009

  13. [13]

    Discontinuous Galerkin spectral element approximations on moving meshes,

    C. A. A. Minoli and D. A. Kopriva, “Discontinuous Galerkin spectral element approximations on moving meshes,”Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 230, no. 5, pp. 1876–1902, 2011

    1902

  14. [14]

    An arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian local discontinuous Galerkin method for Hamilton–Jacobi equations,

    C. Klingenberg, G. Schnücke, and Y. Xia, “An arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian local discontinuous Galerkin method for Hamilton–Jacobi equations,”Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 73, no. 2, 2017

    2017

  15. [15]

    Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian discontinuous Galerkin method for conservation laws on moving simplex meshes,

    P. Fu, G. Schnücke, and Y. Xia, “Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian discontinuous Galerkin method for conservation laws on moving simplex meshes,”Mathematics of Computation, vol. 88, no. 319, pp. 2221–2255, 2019

    2019

  16. [16]

    Geometric conservation law and its application to flow com- putations on moving grids,

    P. D. Thomas and C. K. Lombard, “Geometric conservation law and its application to flow com- putations on moving grids,”AIAA Journal, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1030–1037, 1979. Publisher: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

    1979

  17. [17]

    High-order arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian discontinuous Galerkin methods for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations,

    N. Fehn, J. Heinz, W. A. Wall, and M. Kronbichler, “High-order arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian discontinuous Galerkin methods for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations,”Journal of Com- putational Physics, vol. 430, p. 110040, 2021

    2021

  18. [18]

    A characteristic-based spectral element method for moving-domain problems,

    S. Patel, P. Fischer, M. Min, and A. Tomboulides, “A characteristic-based spectral element method for moving-domain problems,”Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 564–592, 2019

    2019

  19. [19]

    Recent Developments in Spectral Element Sim- ulations of Moving-Domain Problems,

    P. Fischer, M. Schmitt, and A. Tomboulides, “Recent Developments in Spectral Element Sim- ulations of Moving-Domain Problems,” inRecent Progress and Modern Challenges in Applied Mathematics, Modeling and Computational Science(R. Melnik, R. Makarov, and J. Belair, eds.), pp. 213–244, New York, NY: Springer, 2017

    2017

  20. [20]

    High order direct Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian schemes on moving Voronoi meshes with topology changes,

    E. Gaburro, W. Boscheri, S. Chiocchetti, C. Klingenberg, V. Springel, and M. Dumbser, “High order direct Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian schemes on moving Voronoi meshes with topology changes,”Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 407, p. 109167, 2020

    2020

  21. [21]

    High-order Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian schemes on crazy mov- ing Voronoi meshes,

    E. Gaburro and S. Chiocchetti, “High-order Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian schemes on crazy mov- ing Voronoi meshes,” inAdvances in Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Balance Laws and Related Problems(G. Albi, W. Boscheri, and M. Zanella, eds.), pp. 99–119, Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023

    2023

  22. [22]

    Numerical simulation of flapping wings using a panel method and a high-order Navier–Stokes solver,

    P.-O. Persson, D. Willis, and J. Peraire, “Numerical simulation of flapping wings using a panel method and a high-order Navier–Stokes solver,”International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 89, no. 10, 2012

    2012

  23. [23]

    Design of a carangiform swimming robot through a multiphysics simulation environment,

    D. Costa, G. Palmieri, M.-C. Palpacelli, D. Scaradozzi, and M. Callegari, “Design of a carangiform swimming robot through a multiphysics simulation environment,”Biomimetics, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 46, 2020

    2020

  24. [24]

    Y. Wang, A. Quaini, and S. Čanić, “A higher-order discontinuous Galerkin/Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian partitioned approach to solving fluid–structure interaction problems with incompressible, viscous fluids and elastic structures,”Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 481–520, 2018

    2018

  25. [25]

    Chapman and T

    S. Chapman and T. G. Cowling,The mathematical theory of non-uniform gases: An account of the kinetic theory of viscosity, thermal conduction and diffusion in gases. Cambridge university press, 1990. 18

    1990

  26. [26]

    Lattice-Boltzmann method for complex flows,

    C. K. Aidun and J. R. Clausen, “Lattice-Boltzmann method for complex flows,”Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 439–472, 2010

    2010

  27. [27]

    Discretization of the Boltzmann equation in velocity space using a Galerkin approach,

    J. Tölke, M. Krafczyk, M. Schulz, and E. Rank, “Discretization of the Boltzmann equation in velocity space using a Galerkin approach,”Computer Physics Communications, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 91–99, 2000

    2000

  28. [28]

    Discontinuous Galerkin discretiza- tions of the Boltzmann–BGK equations for nearly incompressible flows: Semi-analytic time step- ping and absorbing boundary layers,

    A. Karakus, N. Chalmers, J. S. Hesthaven, and T. Warburton, “Discontinuous Galerkin discretiza- tions of the Boltzmann–BGK equations for nearly incompressible flows: Semi-analytic time step- ping and absorbing boundary layers,”Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 390, pp. 175–202, 2019

    2019

  29. [29]

    Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian formulation of lattice Boltzmann model for compressible flows on unstructured moving meshes,

    M. H. Saadat and I. V. Karlin, “Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian formulation of lattice Boltzmann model for compressible flows on unstructured moving meshes,”Physics of Fluids, vol. 32, no. 4, 2020

    2020

  30. [30]

    An arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian approach for the simulation of immersed moving solids with lattice Boltzmann method,

    M. Meldi, E. Vergnault, and P. Sagaut, “An arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian approach for the simulation of immersed moving solids with lattice Boltzmann method,”Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 235, pp. 182–198, 2013

    2013

  31. [31]

    On the immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann simulations of incompressible flows with freely moving objects,

    Y. Wang, C. Shu, L. Yang, and Y. Sun, “On the immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann simulations of incompressible flows with freely moving objects,”International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 331–350, 2017

    2017

  32. [32]

    B. Wu, J. Lu, H. Lee, C. Shu, and M. Wan, “An efficient explicit immersed boundary-reconstructed lattice Boltzmann flux solver for isothermal fluid-structure interaction problems with large defor- mations and complex geometries,”Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 114, pp. 627–645, 2023

    2023

  33. [33]

    Implicit large eddy simulation of nearly incompressible flows with a discontinuous Galerkin–Boltzmann formulation,

    O. Ata, A. Aygun, T. Warburton, and A. Karakus, “Implicit large eddy simulation of nearly incompressible flows with a discontinuous Galerkin–Boltzmann formulation,”Physics of Fluids, vol. 38, no. 5, p. 055134, 2026

    2026

  34. [34]

    An explicit construction of interpolation nodes on the simplex,

    T. Warburton, “An explicit construction of interpolation nodes on the simplex,”Journal of Engi- neering Mathematics, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 247–262, 2006

    2006

  35. [35]

    On the geometric conservation law in transient flow cal- culations on deforming domains,

    C. Förster, W. A. Wall, and E. Ramm, “On the geometric conservation law in transient flow cal- culations on deforming domains,”International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 1369–1379, 2006

    2006

  36. [36]

    libParanumal: a performance portable high-order finite element library,

    N. Chalmers, A. Karakus, A. P. Austin, K. Swirydowicz, and T. Warburton, “libParanumal: a performance portable high-order finite element library,” 2022. Release 0.5.0

    2022

  37. [37]

    OCCA: A unified approach to multi-threading languages

    D. S. Medina, A. St-Cyr, and T. Warburton, “Occa: A unified approach to multi-threading lan- guages,”arXiv:1403.0968, 2014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  38. [38]

    An arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian discontinuous Galerkin method for simulations of flows over variable geometries,

    V.-T. Nguyen, “An arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian discontinuous Galerkin method for simulations of flows over variable geometries,”Journal of Fluids and Structures, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 312–329, 2010

    2010

  39. [39]

    A comparison of vortex and pseudo-spectral methods for the simulation of periodic vortical flows at high Reynolds numbers,

    W. M. Van Rees, A. Leonard, D. I. Pullin, and P. Koumoutsakos, “A comparison of vortex and pseudo-spectral methods for the simulation of periodic vortical flows at high Reynolds numbers,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 230, no. 8, pp. 2794–2805, 2011

    2011

  40. [40]

    Spectral properties of high-order element types for implicit large eddy simulation,

    C. A. Pereira and B. C. Vermeire, “Spectral properties of high-order element types for implicit large eddy simulation,”Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 85, no. 2, p. 48, 2020

    2020

  41. [41]

    Experimental and computational investigation of the Knoller-Betz effect,

    K. Jones, C. Dohring, and M. Platzer, “Experimental and computational investigation of the Knoller-Betz effect,”AIAA journal, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1240–1246, 1998

    1998

  42. [42]

    High-order accurate simulations of unsteady flow past plunging and pitching airfoils,

    C. Liang, K. Ou, S. Premasuthan, A. Jameson, and Z. Wang, “High-order accurate simulations of unsteady flow past plunging and pitching airfoils,”Computers & Fluids, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 236–248, 2011

    2011

  43. [43]

    P. P. A. Valdivia y Alvarado,Design of biomimetic compliant devices for locomotion in liquid environments. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007. 19

    2007

  44. [44]

    Scaling laws for caudal fin swimmers incorporating hydrody- namics, kinematics, morphology and scale effects,

    J.-H. Seo, J. Zhou, and R. Mittal, “Scaling laws for caudal fin swimmers incorporating hydrody- namics, kinematics, morphology and scale effects,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 1030, p. A25, 2026

    2026

  45. [45]

    Fast continuous swimming of two pelagic predators, saithe (Pollachius virens) and mackerel (Scomber scombrus): a kinematic analysis,

    J. Videler and F. Hess, “Fast continuous swimming of two pelagic predators, saithe (Pollachius virens) and mackerel (Scomber scombrus): a kinematic analysis,”Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 209–228, 1984

    1984

  46. [46]

    Effect of bending kinematics for caudal fin on swimming performance with varying undulation wavelengths,

    S. Huang, D. Guo, J. Song, Y. Wang, G. Yang, and B. Yin, “Effect of bending kinematics for caudal fin on swimming performance with varying undulation wavelengths,”Ocean Engineering, vol. 311, p. 118907, 2024. 20

    2024