pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00718 · v2 · pith:NMZR4ZBZnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · 🪐 quant-ph

Enhancing Nonreciprocity through Squeezing-Induced Symmetry Breaking

B.-B. Liu , D.-Y. Wang , J. Tang , Gang Chen , H. Jing , Shi-Lei Su , F. Nori This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 20:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords nonreciprocitysqueezingsymmetry breakingquantum batteryreservoir engineeringoptical isolationcavity systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Squeezing-induced symmetry breaking between two cavities exponentially amplifies reservoir-mediated nonreciprocity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes squeezing-induced symmetry breaking between two cavities as a way to exponentially amplify nonreciprocity effects mediated by a reservoir. This mechanism redistributes squeezing resources rather than simply scaling couplings, which relaxes the experimental squeezing strength needed compared to single-cavity approaches. It also reshapes noise correlations to change dynamics without altering system symmetry. Sympathetic readers would care as this leads to several orders of magnitude improvement in quantum battery performance including stored energy, charging power and ergotropy, along with enhanced optical isolation.

Core claim

Squeezing-induced symmetry breaking between two cavities exponentially amplifies reservoir-mediated nonreciprocity. Rather than a simple scaling of the coupling, this mechanism strategically redistributes the squeezing resources to relax experimental requirements, as single-cavity squeezing alone demands a much larger squeezing strength. Reservoir squeezing does not alter the system symmetry, but reshapes the noise correlations and thereby changes the system dynamics. The proposed mechanism improves the performance of the quantum battery by several orders of magnitude, including stored energy, charging power, and ergotropy, with the analytical expressions provided. Extending to the optical i

What carries the argument

Squeezing-induced symmetry breaking between two cavities, which redistributes squeezing resources to exponentially enhance nonreciprocity by reshaping noise correlations without changing system symmetry.

If this is right

  • Quantum battery stored energy, charging power, and ergotropy improve by several orders of magnitude.
  • Analytical expressions for the performance metrics are derived.
  • Optical isolation output signal shows second-order exponential enhancement.
  • Experimental squeezing strength requirements are relaxed compared to single-cavity squeezing.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The two-cavity approach may enable nonreciprocal devices with lower overall resources in quantum information processing.
  • Similar symmetry breaking mechanisms could be explored in other multi-mode quantum systems for amplified nonreciprocity.
  • Verification would involve comparing nonreciprocity levels at fixed squeezing strengths between one- and two-cavity configurations.

Load-bearing premise

Reservoir squeezing reshapes noise correlations to change system dynamics without altering the system symmetry.

What would settle it

A direct comparison of nonreciprocity strength as a function of squeezing parameter in single-cavity versus two-cavity setups would show whether the exponential amplification occurs only in the two-cavity case.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00718 by B.-B. Liu, D.-Y. Wang, F. Nori, Gang Chen, H. Jing, J. Tang, Shi-Lei Su.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a) Schematic of the nonreciprocal coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a) Schematic illustration of the nonreciprocal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (a) Evolution of the quantum battery energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: (a) Transmission coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (a) Transmission coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Reservoir engineering enables unidirectional energy and signal flow. We establish squeezing-induced symmetry breaking between two cavities as a guiding principle for exponentially amplifying reservoir-mediated nonreciprocity. Rather than a simple scaling of the coupling, this mechanism strategically redistributes the squeezing resources to relax experimental requirements, as single-cavity squeezing alone demands a much larger squeezing strength. Moreover, reservoir squeezing does not alter the system symmetry, but reshapes the noise correlations and thereby changes the system dynamics. The proposed mechanism improves the performance of the quantum battery by several orders of magnitude, including stored energy, charging power, and ergotropy, with the analytical expressions provided. Extending to the optical isolation, we observe a second-order exponential enhancement of the output signal. Our results open a new avenue for nonreciprocal quantum information processing and nonreciprocal quantum device design.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that squeezing the shared reservoir of two cavities induces symmetry breaking that exponentially amplifies reservoir-mediated nonreciprocity. Reservoir squeezing is asserted to reshape noise correlations without altering the underlying system symmetry, allowing redistribution of squeezing resources to relax experimental requirements relative to single-cavity squeezing. This yields several-orders-of-magnitude improvements in quantum-battery metrics (stored energy, charging power, ergotropy) with supplied analytical expressions, and produces a second-order exponential enhancement of the output signal for optical isolation.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work supplies a concrete guiding principle for nonreciprocity enhancement via strategic use of reservoir squeezing, with direct implications for quantum batteries and isolators. The explicit analytical expressions constitute a strength, enabling falsifiable predictions and parameter optimization without numerical fitting.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Master-equation derivation): the claim that 'reservoir squeezing does not alter the system symmetry, but reshapes the noise correlations' is load-bearing for the exponential-enhancement result. The two-mode squeezing operator applied to the reservoir must be shown explicitly not to generate effective cross terms that modify cavity-cavity or cavity-reservoir couplings in the interaction picture; otherwise the symmetry-breaking mechanism and the claimed gain over single-cavity squeezing become artifacts of an incomplete transformation.
  2. [§4] §4 (Quantum-battery results): the reported orders-of-magnitude improvement in stored energy, charging power, and ergotropy is presented without a direct side-by-side comparison table to the single-cavity squeezing baseline at equal total squeezing resource; the exponential scaling must be verified to survive after accounting for any additional decoherence channels introduced by the two-cavity geometry.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure 2 caption: the parameter values used for the plotted curves (squeezing strength, cavity-reservoir coupling, etc.) should be stated explicitly so that the analytical expressions can be reproduced from the figure.
  2. [Notation] Notation: the symbol for the two-mode squeezing parameter is introduced without a clear definition of its relation to the single-mode squeezing parameter used in the comparison; a short table or sentence reconciling the two would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the major comments below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Master-equation derivation): the claim that 'reservoir squeezing does not alter the system symmetry, but reshapes the noise correlations' is load-bearing for the exponential-enhancement result. The two-mode squeezing operator applied to the reservoir must be shown explicitly not to generate effective cross terms that modify cavity-cavity or cavity-reservoir couplings in the interaction picture; otherwise the symmetry-breaking mechanism and the claimed gain over single-cavity squeezing become artifacts of an incomplete transformation.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration strengthens the derivation. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated appendix deriving the master equation after the two-mode squeezing transformation. We show that, in the interaction picture with respect to the free Hamiltonian, the squeezing operator modifies only the bath correlation functions (specifically the noise correlations) while leaving the system Hamiltonian and the form of the cavity-reservoir interaction terms unchanged; no new cavity-cavity or cross-coupling terms appear. This confirms that the underlying symmetry is preserved and the exponential enhancement arises solely from the reshaped correlations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Quantum-battery results): the reported orders-of-magnitude improvement in stored energy, charging power, and ergotropy is presented without a direct side-by-side comparison table to the single-cavity squeezing baseline at equal total squeezing resource; the exponential scaling must be verified to survive after accounting for any additional decoherence channels introduced by the two-cavity geometry.

    Authors: We will add a direct comparison table (and accompanying text) contrasting the battery metrics under reservoir squeezing versus single-cavity squeezing at fixed total squeezing strength. Regarding decoherence, the two-cavity master equation already includes all relevant loss channels for the geometry; the reservoir squeezing does not introduce additional dissipation rates beyond those present in the single-cavity case. We will explicitly confirm that the exponential scaling remains intact under these conditions by including the updated analytical expressions and numerical checks in the revision. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation remains independent of its inputs

full rationale

The paper derives the exponential nonreciprocity enhancement from a two-cavity master equation under reservoir squeezing, explicitly separating system symmetry (unchanged) from reshaped noise correlations that alter dynamics. Analytical expressions for stored energy, power, and ergotropy are obtained directly from the model without fitting parameters to the target quantities or invoking self-citations as uniqueness theorems. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input or self-defined quantity by construction; the mechanism is presented as a first-principles consequence of the interaction Hamiltonian and Lindblad terms. The result is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted. The central claim rests on unstated assumptions about how squeezing redistributes resources and reshapes noise without symmetry change.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5688 in / 1122 out tokens · 15138 ms · 2026-07-03T20:50:26.228975+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 125 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Jalas, A

    D. Jalas, A. Petrov, M. Eich, W. Freude, S. Fan, Z. Yu, R. Baets, M. Popovi´ c, A. Melloni, J. D. Joannopoulos, M. Vanwolleghem, C. R. Doerr, and H. Renner, What is 6 — and what is not — an optical isolator, Nat. Photonics 7, 579 (2013)

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    L. Bi, J. Hu, P. Jiang, D. H. Kim, G. F. Dionne, L. C. Kimerling, and C. A. Ross, On-chip optical isolation in monolithically integrated non-reciprocal optical res- onators, Nat. Photonics5, 758 (2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Fujita, M

    J. Fujita, M. Levy, R. M. Osgood Jr., L. Wilkens, and H. D¨ otsch, Waveguide optical isolator based on Mach–Zehnder interferometer, Appl. Phys. Lett.76, 2158 (2000)

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    Shoji and T

    Y. Shoji and T. Mizumoto, Magneto-optical non- reciprocal devices in silicon photonics, Sci. Tech. Adv. Mater.15, 014602 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Rosario Hamann, C

    A. Rosario Hamann, C. M¨ uller, M. Jerger, M. Zanner, J. Combes, M. Pletyukhov, M. Weides, T. M. Stace, and A. Fedorov, Nonreciprocity realized with quantum nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 123601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Miao and G

    Q. Miao and G. S. Agarwal, Kerr nonlinearity induced nonreciprocity in dissipatively coupled resonators, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033020 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Soljaˇ ci´ c, C

    M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, C. Luo, J. D. Joannopoulos, and S. Fan, Nonlinear photonic crystal microdevices for optical in- tegration, Opt. Lett.28, 637 (2003)

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    X.-W. Xu, Y. Li, B. Li, H. Jing, and A.-X. Chen, Non- reciprocity via nonlinearity and synthetic magnetism, Phys. Rev. Appl.13, 044070 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    R.-K. Pan, L. Tang, K. Xia, and F. Nori, Dynamic nonreciprocity with a Kerr nonlinear resonator, Chinese Phys. Lett.39, 124201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Fang and S

    K. Fang and S. Fan, Controlling the flow of light using the inhomogeneous effective gauge field that emerges from dynamic modulation, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 203901 (2013)

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    Chen, Y.-L

    Y. Chen, Y.-L. Zhang, Z. Shen, C.-L. Zou, G.-C. Guo, and C.-H. Dong, Synthetic gauge fields in a single op- tomechanical resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 123603 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Ruesink, M.-A

    F. Ruesink, M.-A. Miri, A. Al` u, and E. Verhagen, Nonreciprocity and magnetic-free isolation based on optomechanical interactions, Nat. Commun.7, 13662 (2016)

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Shen, Y.-L

    Z. Shen, Y.-L. Zhang, Y. Chen, C.-L. Zou, Y.-F. Xiao, X.-B. Zou, F.-W. Sun, G.-C. Guo, and C.-H. Dong, Ex- perimental realization of optomechanically induced non- reciprocity, Nat. Photonics10, 657 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Manipatruni, J

    S. Manipatruni, J. T. Robinson, and M. Lipson, Optical nonreciprocity in optomechanical structures, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 213903 (2009)

    work page 2009

  15. [15]

    Hafezi and P

    M. Hafezi and P. Rabl, Optomechanically induced non- reciprocity in microring resonators, Opt. Express20, 7672 (2012)

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    Dong, K.-Y

    M.-X. Dong, K.-Y. Xia, W.-H. Zhang, Y.-C. Yu, Y.- H. Ye, E.-Z. Li, L. Zeng, D.-S. Ding, B.-S. Shi, G.-C. Guo, and F. Nori, All-optical reversible single-photon isolation at room temperature, Sci. Adv.7, eabe8924 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Peng, S ¸

    B. Peng, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, F. Lei, F. Monifi, M. Gian- freda, G. L. Long, S. Fan, F. Nori, C. M. Bender, and L. Yang, Parity–time-symmetric whispering-gallery mi- crocavities, Nat. Phys.10, 394 (2014)

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    Maayani, R

    S. Maayani, R. Dahan, Y. Kligerman, E. Moses, A. U. Hassan, H. Jing, F. Nori, D. N. Christodoulides, and T. Carmon, Flying couplers above spinning resonators generate irreversible refraction, Nature558, 569 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Tokura and N

    Y. Tokura and N. Nagaosa, Nonreciprocal responses from non-centrosymmetric quantum materials, Nat. Commun.9, 3740 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    N. A. Estep, D. L. Sounas, J. Soric, and A. Al` u, Magnetic-free non-reciprocity and isolation based on parametrically modulated coupled-resonator loops, Nat. Phys.10, 923 (2014)

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    S. Yang, M. Liu, C. Zhao, S. Fan, and C.-W. Qiu, Non- reciprocal thermal photonics, Nat. Photonics18, 412 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Zhang, Z

    Z. Zhang, Z. Xu, R. Huang, X. Lu, F. Zhang, D. Li, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, F. Nori, H. Bao, Y. Xiao, B. Chen, H. Jing, and H. Shen, Chirality-induced quantum non- reciprocity, Nat. Photonics19, 840 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Caloz, A

    C. Caloz, A. Al` u, S. Tretyakov, D. Sounas, K. Achouri, and Z.-L. Deck-L´ eger, Electromagnetic nonreciprocity, Phys. Rev. Appl.10, 047001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    H. Wu, J. Tang, M. Chen, M. Xiao, Y. Lu, K. Xia, and F. Nori, Passive magnetic-free broadband optical isola- tor based on unidirectional self-induced transparency, Opt. Express32, 11010 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Ju, P.-C

    R. Ju, P.-C. Cao, D. Wang, M. Qi, L. Xu, S. Yang, C.-W. Qiu, H. Chen, and Y. Li, Nonreciprocal heat cir- culation metadevices, Adv. Mater.36, 2309835 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Y.-T. Chen, L. Du, L. Guo, Z. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, and J.-H. Wu, Nonreciprocal and chiral single- photon scattering for giant atoms, Commun. Phys.5, 215 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Huang, C

    X. Huang, C. Lu, C. Liang, H. Tao, and Y.-C. Liu, Loss- induced nonreciprocity, Light Sci. Appl.10, 30 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Li, Y.-L

    B.-J. Li, Y.-L. Zuo, L.-M. Kuang, H. Jing, and C.-H. Lee, Loss-induced quantum nonreciprocity, npj Quan- tum Inf.10, 75 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    W. Gou, T. Chen, D. Xie, T. Xiao, T.-S. Deng, B. Gad- way, W. Yi, and B. Yan, Tunable nonreciprocal quan- tum transport through a dissipative Aharonov-Bohm ring in ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 070402 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Huang and Y.-C

    X. Huang and Y.-C. Liu, Perfect nonreciprocity by loss engineering, Phys. Rev. A107, 023703 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineer- ing, Phys. Rev. X5, 021025 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Y.-X. Wang, C. Wang, and A. A. Clerk, Quantum non- reciprocal interactions via dissipative gauge symmetry, PRX Quantum4, 010306 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    K. Fang, J. Luo, A. Metelmann, M. H. Matheny, F. Mar- quardt, A. A. Clerk, and O. Painter, Generalized non- reciprocity in an optomechanical circuit via synthetic magnetism and reservoir engineering, Nat. Phys.13, 465 (2017)

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Y.-P. Wang, J. W. Rao, Y. Yang, P.-C. Xu, Y. S. Gui, B. M. Yao, J. Q. You, and C.-M. Hu, Nonreciproc- ity and unidirectional invisibility in cavity magnonics, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 127202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    S. E. Begg and R. Hanai, Quantum criticality in open quantum spin chains with nonreciprocity, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 120401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    X. Lu, W. Cao, W. Yi, H. Shen, and Y. Xiao, Non- reciprocity and quantum correlations of light transport in hot atoms via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 223603 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Ahmadi, P

    B. Ahmadi, P. Mazurek, P. Horodecki, and S. Barzan- jeh, Nonreciprocal quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 210402 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Loudon and P

    R. Loudon and P. L. Knight, Squeezed light, J. Mod. 7 Opt.34, 709 (1987)

    work page 1987

  39. [39]

    J. Ma, X. Wang, C. Sun, and F. Nori, Quantum spin squeezing, Phys. Rep.509, 89 (2011)

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    Wasilewski, A

    W. Wasilewski, A. I. Lvovsky, K. Banaszek, and C. Radzewicz, Pulsed squeezed light: Simultaneous squeezing of multiple modes, Phys. Rev. A73, 063819 (2006)

    work page 2006

  41. [41]

    U. L. Andersen, T. Gehring, C. Marquardt, and G. Leuchs, 30 years of squeezed light generation, Phys. Scr.91, 053001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    R. E. Slusher, L. W. Hollberg, B. Yurke, J. C. Mertz, and J. F. Valley, Observation of squeezed states gen- erated by four-wave mixing in an optical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 2409 (1985)

    work page 1985

  43. [43]

    E. E. Wollman, C. U. Lei, A. J. Weinstein, J. Suh, A. Kronwald, F. Marquardt, A. A. Clerk, and K. C. Schwab, Quantum squeezing of motion in a mechanical resonator, Science349, 952 (2015)

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    Est` eve, C

    J. Est` eve, C. Gross, A. Weller, S. Giovanazzi, and M. K. Oberthaler, Squeezing and entanglement in a Bose– Einstein condensate, Nature455, 1216 (2008)

    work page 2008

  45. [45]

    Vahlbruch, M

    H. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet, S. Chelkowski, B. Hage, A. Franzen, N. Lastzka, S. Goßler, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, Observation of squeezed light with 10-dB quantum-noise reduction, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 033602 (2008)

    work page 2008

  46. [46]

    Ourjoumtsev, A

    A. Ourjoumtsev, A. Kubanek, M. Koch, C. Sames, P. W. H. Pinkse, G. Rempe, and K. Murr, Observa- tion of squeezed light from one atom excited with two photons, Nature474, 623 (2011)

    work page 2011

  47. [47]

    A. H. Safavi-Naeini, S. Gr¨ oblacher, J. T. Hill, J. Chan, M. Aspelmeyer, and O. Painter, Squeezed light from a silicon micromechanical resonator, Nature500, 185 (2013)

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    Vahlbruch, M

    H. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet, K. Danzmann, and R. Schn- abel, Detection of 15 dB squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute calibration of pho- toelectric quantum efficiency, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 110801 (2016)

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    Zhang, M

    Y. Zhang, M. Menotti, K. Tan, V. D. Vaidya, D. H. Mahler, L. G. Helt, L. Zatti, M. Liscidini, B. Morri- son, and Z. Vernon, Squeezed light from a nanophotonic molecule, Nat. Commun.12, 2233 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Mehmet, S

    M. Mehmet, S. Ast, T. Eberle, S. Steinlechner, H. Vahlbruch, and R. Schnabel, Squeezed light at 1550 nm with a quantum noise reduction of 12.3 db, Opt. Express19, 25763 (2011)

    work page 2011

  51. [51]

    Zhang, Y

    S. Zhang, Y. Hu, G. Lin, Y. Niu, K. Xia, J. Gong, S. Gong, S. Marti, U. von L¨ upke, O. Joshi, Y. Yang, M. Bild, A. Omahen, Y. Chu, and M. Fadel, Quan- tum squeezing in a nonlinear mechanical oscillator, Nat. Phys.20, 1448 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    W. Qin, A. Miranowicz, P.-B. Li, X.-Y. L¨ u, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, Exponentially enhanced light-matter inter- action, cooperativities, and steady-state entanglement using parametric amplification, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 093601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  53. [53]

    W. Qin, A. F. Kockum, C. S. Mu˜ noz, A. Miranow- icz, and F. Nori, Quantum amplification and simulation of strong and ultrastrong coupling of light and matter, Phys. Rep.1078, 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    X.-Y. L¨ u, Y. Wu, J. R. Johansson, H. Jing, J. Zhang, and F. Nori, Squeezed optomechanics with phase- matched amplification and dissipation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 093602 (2015)

    work page 2015

  55. [55]

    L. Tang, J. Tang, M. Chen, F. Nori, M. Xiao, and K. Xia, Quantum squeezing induced optical nonre- ciprocity, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 083604 (2022)

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    L. D. Bino, J. M. Silver, M. T. M. Woodley, S. L. Steb- bings, X. Zhao, and P. Del’Haye, Microresonator isola- tors and circulators based on the intrinsic nonreciprocity of the kerr effect, Optica5, 279 (2018)

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    Wang, L.-L

    D.-Y. Wang, L.-L. Yan, S.-L. Su, C.-H. Bai, H.-F. Wang, and E. Liang, Squeezing-induced nonreciprocal photon blockade in an optomechanical microresonator, Opt. Ex- press31, 22343 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    Gheeraert, S

    N. Gheeraert, S. Kono, and Y. Nakamura, Pro- grammable directional emitter and receiver of itinerant microwave photons in a waveguide, Phys. Rev. A102, 053720 (2020)

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    Guimond, B

    P.-O. Guimond, B. Vermersch, M. L. Juan, A. Sharafiev, G. Kirchmair, and P. Zoller, A unidirectional on-chip photonic interface for superconducting circuits, npj Quantum Inf.6, 32 (2020)

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    Kannan, A

    B. Kannan, A. Almanakly, Y. Sung, A. Di Paolo, D. A. Rower, J. Braum¨ uller, A. Melville, B. M. Niedziel- ski, A. Karamlou, K. Serniak, A. Veps¨ al¨ ainen, M. E. Schwartz, J. L. Yoder, R. Winik, J. I.-J. Wang, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, J. A. Grover, and W. D. Oliver, On-demand directional microwave photon emission us- ing waveguide quantum electrodyna...

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Azouit, F

    R. Azouit, F. Chittaro, A. Sarlette, and P. Rouchon, To- wards generic adiabatic elimination for bipartite open quantum systems, Quantum Sci. Technol.2, 044011 (2017)

    work page 2017

  62. [62]

    Azouit, A

    R. Azouit, A. Sarlette, and P. Rouchon, Adiabatic elimi- nation for open quantum systems with effective lindblad master equations, inIEEE Conf. on Decision and Con- trol(2016) pp. 4559–4565

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    Saideh, D

    I. Saideh, D. Finkelstein-Shapiro, T. Pullerits, and A. Keller, Projection-based adiabatic elimination of bi- partite open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A102, 032212 (2020)

    work page 2020

  64. [64]

    Le R´ egent and P

    F.-M. Le R´ egent and P. Rouchon, Adiabatic elimination for composite open quantum systems: Reduced-model formulation and numerical simulations, Phys. Rev. A 109, 032603 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    Tokieda, C

    M. Tokieda, C. Elouard, A. Sarlette, and P. Rouchon, Complete positivity violation of the reduced dynamics in higher-order quantum adiabatic elimination, Phys. Rev. A109, 062206 (2024)

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    [58, 61-65, 88, 89, 93, 94]

    See Supplemental Material [URL] for detailed deriva- tions of the Lindblad operator for the common reser- voir, the operator evolution equations in the squeezing framework, analysis of the squeezed-cavity frequency, analytical expressions for energy and ergotropy of the quantum battery, and the scattering coefficient matrix of the optical isolator,which i...

    work page

  67. [67]

    S. Ast, M. Mehmet, and R. Schnabel, High-bandwidth squeezed light at 1550 nm from a compact monolithic PPKTP cavity, Opt. Express21, 13572 (2013)

    work page 2013

  68. [68]

    Campaioli, S

    F. Campaioli, S. Gherardini, J. Q. Quach, M. Polini, and G. M. Andolina, Colloquium: Quantum batteries, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 031001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    Alicki and M

    R. Alicki and M. Fannes, Entanglement boost for ex- tractable work from ensembles of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. E87, 042123 (2013)

    work page 2013

  70. [70]

    J. Q. Quach, K. E. McGhee, L. Ganzer, D. M. Rouse, 8 B. W. Lovett, E. M. Gauger, J. Keeling, G. Cerullo, D. G. Lidzey, and T. Virgili, Superabsorption in an or- ganic microcavity: Toward a quantum battery, Sci. Adv. 8, eabk3160 (2022)

    work page 2022

  71. [71]

    Campaioli, F

    F. Campaioli, F. A. Pollock, F. C. Binder, L. C´ eleri, J. Goold, S. Vinjanampathy, and K. Modi, Enhancing the charging power of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 150601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    Ferraro, M

    D. Ferraro, M. Campisi, G. M. Andolina, V. Pellegrini, and M. Polini, High-power collective charging of a solid- state quantum battery, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 117702 (2018)

    work page 2018

  73. [73]

    G. M. Andolina, M. Keck, A. Mari, M. Campisi, V. Gio- vannetti, and M. Polini, Extractable work, the role of correlations, and asymptotic freedom in quantum bat- teries, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 047702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  74. [74]

    G. Zhu, Y. Chen, Y. Hasegawa, and P. Xue, Charging quantum batteries via indefinite causal order: Theory and experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 240401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  75. [75]

    Barra, Dissipative charging of a quantum battery, Phys

    F. Barra, Dissipative charging of a quantum battery, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 210601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  76. [76]

    Song, H.-B

    W.-L. Song, H.-B. Liu, B. Zhou, W.-L. Yang, and J.- H. An, Remote charging and degradation suppression for the quantum battery, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 090401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    H.-L. Shi, S. Ding, Q.-K. Wan, X.-H. Wang, and W.-L. Yang, Entanglement, coherence, and extractable work in quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 130602 (2022)

    work page 2022

  78. [78]

    Song, J.-L

    W.-L. Song, J.-L. Wang, B. Zhou, W.-L. Yang, and J.-H. An, Self-discharging mitigated quantum battery, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 020405 (2025)

    work page 2025

  79. [79]

    Z.-G. Lu, G. Tian, X.-Y. L¨ u, and C. Shang, Topological quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 180401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  80. [80]

    F. C. Binder, S. Vinjanampathy, K. Modi, and J. Goold, Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries, New J. Phys.17, 075015 (2015)

    work page 2015

Showing first 80 references.