pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.02178 · v1 · pith:5F2F5SBGnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · physics.ins-det

Coherent two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy integrated with confocal back focal plane microscopy

Trideep Kawde , Pavel Trofimov , Anton Trenczek , Matteo Russo , Jasper Wilhelm Schwering , H\'el\`ene Seiler This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 09:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.ins-det
keywords two-dimensional electronic spectroscopyback focal plane microscopyconfocal imagingWSe2 monolayerexcitonsultrafast spectroscopyreflection geometry2D materials
0
0 comments X

The pith

An integrated setup combines coherent two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy with confocal back focal plane microscopy for 2D materials.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a new apparatus that merges coherent two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy in pump-probe reflection geometry with a confocal back focal plane imaging microscope. This design uses angle resolution to set the wavevectors of the pump and probe beams while real-space imaging aligns the collection spots for both linear and ultrafast measurements. Pulses are compressed to 20 fs. The system is shown working on an exfoliated WSe2 monolayer on Si/SiO2. The approach targets studies of excitons and exciton-polaritons in two-dimensional materials and their heterostructures.

Core claim

We introduce a setup for coherent two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy in the pump-probe reflection geometry that is integrated with a confocal back focal plane imaging microscope. The angle-resolved capability is utilized to control pump and probe wavevectors, while real space imaging enables co-localization of the collection spots for linear and ultrafast experiments. Compression of pulses down to 20 fs is achieved. We demonstrate the capabilities of this approach on an exfoliated WSe2 monolayer on Si/SiO2. The setup is suited to investigate excitons and exciton-polaritons in 2D Materials and their heterostructures.

What carries the argument

The confocal back focal plane imaging microscope integrated into the pump-probe reflection geometry 2D electronic spectroscopy system, providing simultaneous angle-resolved wavevector control and real-space spot co-localization.

If this is right

  • Angle-resolved control enables momentum-selective studies of exciton dynamics in 2D layers.
  • Real-space co-localization allows direct comparison of linear absorption and ultrafast 2D spectra on identical sample regions.
  • 20 fs pulse compression supports time-resolved measurements of fast exciton relaxation processes.
  • The reflection geometry setup extends coherent spectroscopy to opaque or substrate-supported 2D samples without transmission requirements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Spatial mapping of exciton properties across a flake could become feasible by scanning the confocal spot while acquiring 2D spectra.
  • The wavevector control may allow direct measurement of exciton-polariton dispersion in integrated cavity structures.
  • The method could be tested on other transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers to check whether the integration preserves coherence across different material systems.

Load-bearing premise

Real-space imaging and back-focal-plane angle control can be combined without introducing significant optical aberrations, timing jitter, or loss of coherence that would prevent reliable 2D spectra on exfoliated monolayers.

What would settle it

If the measured 2D spectra on the WSe2 monolayer exhibit unexpected broadening, missing cross-peaks, or failure to resolve known exciton features compared to prior non-integrated measurements, or if the compressed pulses exceed 20 fs while losing coherence, the integration would be shown to introduce prohibitive distortions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.02178 by Anton Trenczek, H\'el\`ene Seiler, Jasper Wilhelm Schwering, Matteo Russo, Pavel Trofimov, Trideep Kawde.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Instrument overview and linear properties of the sample. (a) Sketch of the setup combining 2DES [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Pulse characteristics at the sample position [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Beam coupling into the microscope objec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Overview of 2D spectroscopy signals on monolayer WSe2 on Si/SiO2 (a-d) Exemplary 2D spectra at population times, t2 = 20 fs, 50 fs, 100 fs and 800 fs, respectively. (e) Integrated temporal dynamics of spectral features shown by rectangles in (a), matching colors. (f) Pseudo transient reflectivity spectra at E1 = 1.667 eV for different t2. Exemplary room temperature 2D spectra of the A exciton of WSe2 are s… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce a setup for coherent two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy in the pump-probe reflection geometry that is integrated with a confocal back focal plane imaging microscope. The angle-resolved capability is utilized to control pump and probe wavevectors, while real space imaging enables co-localization of the collection spots for linear and ultrafast experiments. Compression of pulses down to 20 fs is achieved. We demonstrate the capabilities of this approach on an exfoliated WSe$_2$ monolayer on Si/SiO$_2$. The setup is suited to investigate excitons and exciton-polaritons in 2D Materials and their heterostructures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces an experimental setup integrating coherent two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy (2DES) in the pump-probe reflection geometry with a confocal back focal plane imaging microscope. It reports pulse compression to 20 fs and demonstrates the combined capabilities on an exfoliated WSe2 monolayer on Si/SiO2, with the angle-resolved mode used to control pump and probe wavevectors and real-space imaging for co-localization of spots in linear and ultrafast measurements. The setup is positioned for studies of excitons and exciton-polaritons in 2D materials and heterostructures.

Significance. If the integration is shown to preserve interferometric stability and avoid measurable degradation, the approach would enable simultaneous real-space localization and momentum-resolved coherent spectroscopy on atomically thin samples, providing a useful capability for 2D materials research where both spatial and wavevector control are relevant.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods / Results] The central claim that the combined confocal back-focal-plane and real-space imaging elements can be integrated without compromising coherence or introducing significant aberrations is load-bearing, yet no quantitative validation (e.g., timing jitter, coherence time, or point-spread function comparison between integrated and standalone configurations) is provided to support it.
  2. [Results] The demonstration on WSe2 is presented without reported error analysis, baseline comparisons to conventional 2DES, or metrics confirming that the added optical paths do not degrade the phase stability required for reliable 2D spectra.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states pulse compression to 20 fs but does not indicate the diagnostic used or the spectral bandwidth achieved.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods / Results] The central claim that the combined confocal back-focal-plane and real-space imaging elements can be integrated without compromising coherence or introducing significant aberrations is load-bearing, yet no quantitative validation (e.g., timing jitter, coherence time, or point-spread function comparison between integrated and standalone configurations) is provided to support it.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative validation of the integration's impact on coherence and aberrations is important. Although the demonstration on WSe2 indicates successful operation, we will add in the revised manuscript explicit measurements including timing jitter, coherence time, and point-spread function comparisons between the integrated and standalone setups to support the claim. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] The demonstration on WSe2 is presented without reported error analysis, baseline comparisons to conventional 2DES, or metrics confirming that the added optical paths do not degrade the phase stability required for reliable 2D spectra.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current presentation lacks explicit error analysis, baseline comparisons, and phase stability metrics. In the revision, we will include error analysis for the 2D spectra, provide baseline comparisons to conventional 2DES where feasible, and report metrics on phase stability to demonstrate that the added optical paths do not degrade performance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental instrumentation paper with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper introduces an optical setup for coherent 2D electronic spectroscopy integrated with confocal back-focal-plane microscopy and demonstrates it on WSe2. No equations, parameters fitted to data, predictions, or uniqueness theorems appear in the provided text. The central claim is the feasibility of the combined instrument, supported by experimental description rather than any self-referential derivation. No load-bearing step reduces to a definition, fit, or self-citation chain. This matches the default case of a self-contained experimental report.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are invoked; the contribution is a physical apparatus and its experimental demonstration.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5647 in / 1019 out tokens · 22441 ms · 2026-07-03T09:37:17.928338+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Al Haddad et al

    A. Al Haddad et al. In:Optics Letters40.3 (Jan. 2015), p. 312.issn: 1539-4794.doi:10. 1364/ol.40.000312.url:http://dx.doi. org/10.1364/OL.40.000312

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.40.000312 2015

  2. [2]

    Mohammadjavad Azarm et al. 2026. eprint: arXiv:2603.23759

    work page arXiv 2026

  3. [4]

    In:2D Materials10.3 (2023).issn: 2053-1583.doi:10.1088/2053- 1583 / ace067.url:https : / / iopscience

    Jan Philipp Bange et al. In:2D Materials10.3 (2023).issn: 2053-1583.doi:10.1088/2053- 1583 / ace067.url:https : / / iopscience . iop . org / article / 10 . 1088 / 2053 - 1583 / ace067/meta

    work page doi:10.1088/2053- 2023

  4. [5]

    H. H. Fang et al. In:Physical Review Letters 123.6 (Aug. 2019).issn: 1079-7114.doi:10 . 1103/physrevlett.123.067401.url:http: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123. 067401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123 2019

  5. [6]

    Geib et al

    Nils C. Geib et al. In:Optica6.4 (2019).issn: 495-505.doi:10 . 1364 / OPTICA . 6 . 000495. url:https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1364 / OPTICA . 6.000495. 6

    2019

  6. [7]

    In:Optics Express26.4 (Feb

    Sebastian Goetz et al. In:Optics Express26.4 (Feb. 2018), p. 3915.issn: 1094-4087.doi:10. 1364/oe.26.003915.url:http://dx.doi. org/10.1364/OE.26.003915

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.26.003915 2018

  7. [8]

    In:The Journal of Physical Chemistry C127.30 (July 2023), pp

    Niklas Gross et al. In:The Journal of Physical Chemistry C127.30 (July 2023), pp. 14557– 14586.issn: 1932-7455.doi:10 . 1021 / acs . jpcc.3c02091.url:http://dx.doi.org/10. 1021/acs.jpcc.3c02091

    2023

  8. [9]

    In:Nature Physics15.3 (Dec

    Liang Guo et al. In:Nature Physics15.3 (Dec. 2018), pp. 228–232.issn: 1745-2481.doi:10. 1038/s41567-018-0362-y.url:http://dx. doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0362-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0362-y 2018

  9. [10]

    Cambridge University Press, 2012.isbn: 9780511675935

    Peter Hamm and Martin Zanni. Cambridge University Press, 2012.isbn: 9780511675935. url:https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1017 / CBO9780511675935

    2012

  10. [11]

    In:Nature Physics12.7 (Feb

    Kai Hao et al. In:Nature Physics12.7 (Feb. 2016), pp. 677–682.issn: 1745-2481.doi:10. 1038/nphys3674.url:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nphys3674

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3674 2016

  11. [12]

    Jones et al

    Andrew C. Jones et al. In:The Journal of Physical Chemistry A123.50 (Nov. 2019), pp. 10824–10836.issn: 1520-5215.doi:10 . 1021/acs.jpca.9b09099.url:http://dx. doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b09099

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.9b09099 2019

  12. [13]

    In:Physical Review Letters 128.8 (Feb

    Donghai Li et al. In:Physical Review Letters 128.8 (Feb. 2022).issn: 1079-7114.doi:10 . 1103/physrevlett.128.087401.url:http: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128. 087401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128 2022

  13. [14]

    Lloyd et al

    Lawson T. Lloyd et al. In:ACS Nano15.6 (June 2021), pp. 10253–10263.issn: 1936-086X. doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c02381.url:http: //dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c02381

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c02381.url:http: 2021

  14. [16]

    Optics Express19(10), 9315–9329 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1364/OE

    Xiaonan Ma, Jakub Dost´ al, and Tobias Brixner. In:Optics Express24.18 (Aug. 2016), p. 20781.issn: 1094-4087.doi:10.1364/oe. 24 . 020781.url:http : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 1364/OE.24.020781

    work page doi:10.1364/oe 2016

  15. [17]

    In:Nature Communica- tions6.1 (Sept

    Galan Moody et al. In:Nature Communica- tions6.1 (Sept. 2015).issn: 2041-1723.doi: 10.1038/ncomms9315.url:http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/ncomms9315

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms9315.url:http://dx.doi 2015

  16. [18]

    Myers et al

    Jeffrey A. Myers et al. In:Optics Express16.22 (Oct. 2008), p. 17420.issn: 1094-4087.doi:10. 1364/oe.16.017420.url:http://dx.doi. org/10.1364/oe.16.017420

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.16.017420 2008

  17. [19]

    K. S. Novoselov et al. In:Science353.6298 (2016).issn: 1095-9203.doi:10 . 1126 / science.aac9439.url:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.aac9439

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aac9439 2016

  18. [20]

    Ostrander et al

    Joshua S. Ostrander et al. In:ACS Photon- ics3.7 (June 2016), pp. 1315–1323.issn: 2330- 4022.doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00297. url:http : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 1021 / acsphotonics.6b00297

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00297 2016

  19. [21]

    In:Optics Express 22.25 (Dec

    Monika Paw lowska et al. In:Optics Express 22.25 (Dec. 2014), p. 31496.issn: 1094-4087. doi:10 . 1364 / oe . 22 . 031496.url:http : //dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.031496

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.22.031496 2014

  20. [22]

    Policht et al

    Veronica R. Policht et al. In:Nano Letters 21.11 (May 2021), pp. 4738–4743.issn: 1530- 6992.doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01098. url:http : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 1021 / acs . nanolett.1c01098

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01098 2021

  21. [23]

    Purz et al

    Torben L. Purz et al. In:Physical Review B 104.24 (Dec. 2021).issn: 2469-9969.doi:10. 1103 / physrevb . 104 . l241302.url:http : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 1103 / PhysRevB . 104 . L241302

    2021

  22. [24]

    Purz et al

    Torben L. Purz et al. In:The Journal of Chem- ical Physics156.21 (June 2022).issn: 1089- 7690.doi:10 . 1063 / 5 . 0087544.url:http : //dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0087544. 7

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0087544 2022

  23. [25]

    In:Optics Letters42.3 (Feb

    H´ el` ene Seiler et al. In:Optics Letters42.3 (Feb. 2017), p. 643.issn: 1539-4794.doi:10.1364/ ol.42.000643.url:http://dx.doi.org/10. 1364/OL.42.000643

    2017

  24. [26]

    Sang-Hee Shim and Martin T. Zanni. In:Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.11.5 (2009), pp. 748–761. issn: 1463-9084.doi:10.1039/b813817f.url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B813817F

    work page doi:10.1039/b813817f.url: 2009

  25. [27]

    In:Optics Express29.18 (Aug

    Colin Sonnichsen et al. In:Optics Express29.18 (Aug. 2021), p. 28352.issn: 1094-4087.doi: 10.1364/oe.431988.url:http://dx.doi. org/10.1364/OE.431988

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.431988.url:http://dx.doi 2021

  26. [28]

    Steves, Hongjun Zheng, and Ken- neth L

    Megan A. Steves, Hongjun Zheng, and Ken- neth L. Knappenberger. In:Optics Letters44.8 (Apr. 2019), p. 2117.issn: 1539-4794.doi:10. 1364/ol.44.002117.url:http://dx.doi. org/10.1364/OL.44.002117

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.44.002117 2019

  27. [29]

    In:Optics Express32.1 (Dec

    Daniel Timmer et al. In:Optics Express32.1 (Dec. 2023), p. 835.issn: 1094-4087.doi:10. 1364/oe.511906.url:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1364/OE.511906

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.511906 2023

  28. [30]

    In:Nano Letters24.26 (June 2024), pp

    Daniel Timmer et al. In:Nano Letters24.26 (June 2024), pp. 8117–8125.issn: 1530-6992. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c01991.url: http : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 1021 / acs . nanolett.4c01991

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c01991.url: 2024

  29. [31]

    In:Nature Nanotechnol- ogy(Jan

    Daniel Timmer et al. In:Nature Nanotechnol- ogy(Jan. 2026).issn: 1748-3395.doi:10 . 1038 / s41565 - 025 - 02054 - 4.url:http : / / dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41565-025-02054-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41565-025-02054-4 2026

  30. [32]

    In:Nature Communications 9.1 (Oct

    Vivek Tiwari et al. In:Nature Communications 9.1 (Oct. 2018).issn: 2041-1723.doi:10.1038/ s41467-018-06619-x.url:http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/s41467-018-06619-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06619-x 2018

  31. [33]

    In:Review of Scientific In- struments68.9 (1997), pp

    Rick Trebino et al. In:Review of Scientific In- struments68.9 (1997), pp. 3277–3295.issn: 1089-7623.doi:10 . 1063 / 1 . 1148286.url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1148286

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1148286 1997

  32. [34]

    Trofimov et al

    P. Trofimov et al. In:The Journal of Chemi- cal Physics163.8 (Aug. 2025).issn: 1089-7690. doi:10.1063/5.0279864.url:http://dx. doi.org/10.1063/5.0279864

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0279864.url:http://dx 2025

  33. [35]

    Verluise et al

    F. Verluise et al. In:Optics Letters25.8 (Apr. 2000), p. 575.issn: 1539-4794.doi:10.1364/ ol.25.000575.url:http://dx.doi.org/10. 1364/OL.25.000575

    2000

  34. [36]

    In:Nature Communications 14.1 (2023).issn: 2041-1723.doi:10

    Ding Xu et al. In:Nature Communications 14.1 (2023).issn: 2041-1723.doi:10 . 1038 / s41467-023-39550-x.url:http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/s41467-023-39550-x. 8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39550-x 2023