Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 271 references

Transiting brown dwarfs share one primordial eccentricity distribution that tides later circularise, yielding a typical tidal quality factor of order 10^7–10^8.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 07:44 UTC pith:JLM5O42S

load-bearing objection Solid first population Q_BD from the eccentricity split of the full known transiting-BD sample; the number is useful but rests on an N=8 primordial Beta and equilibrium tides. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.02682 v2 pith:JLM5O42S submitted 2026-07-02 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

On the Eccentricity Distribution and Tidal Evolution of Transiting Brown Dwarfs

Thiago Ferreira , Malena Rice This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR
keywords brown dwarfsorbital eccentricitytidal evolutiontidal quality factorhierarchical Bayesian modelstransiting companionsstar-planet interactions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Brown dwarfs that transit their stars sit in an awkward middle ground between hot Jupiters and tight stellar binaries. Their orbital eccentricities still carry the imprint of how they formed and of any later tidal circularisation. By re-fitting archival radial-velocity data for every known transiting brown dwarf and modelling the resulting eccentricities with a hierarchical Bayesian Beta distribution, the authors show that objects with periods shorter than 16 days are strongly concentrated at low eccentricity, while those with longer periods remain more excited. They treat the longer-period population as the fossil of a single primordial eccentricity distribution and evolve it forward under two standard tidal formalisms until it matches the short-period distribution. That match requires a brown-dwarf tidal quality factor of roughly 10^7–10^8—much less efficient than the values usually adopted for gas-giant planets and closer to the values expected for low-mass stars. The result implies that even close-in brown dwarfs can retain dynamical memory of their formation, and that population-level eccentricity statistics can be turned into quantitative constraints on tidal dissipation.

Core claim

Assuming the full set of transiting brown dwarfs began with the same primordial eccentricity distribution that is still observed among the longer-period systems (a Beta distribution with shape parameters α ≈ 1.88, β ≈ 2.47), the short-period population is the tidally circularised remnant of that distribution. Forward modelling under two equilibrium-tide prescriptions then yields a typical brown-dwarf tidal quality factor Q_BD = 10^{8.1±1.0} when only brown-dwarf tides are considered, or Q_BD = 10^{7.1±0.3} together with a stellar quality factor Q_⋆ = 10^{6.0±0.1} when tides raised on the host star are included.

What carries the argument

A hierarchical Bayesian Beta model for the eccentricity distribution, split at the Kolmogorov–Smirnov-selected period threshold of 16 days, combined with orbit-averaged tidal evolution equations (Wisdom 2008 and Jackson et al. 2008) that are sampled until the evolved distribution minimises the Kullback–Leibler divergence to the observed short-period sample.

Load-bearing premise

That every short-period brown dwarf started with the same eccentricity distribution that we still see among the longer-period ones, so the difference between the two samples is produced only by later tidal damping.

What would settle it

A statistically larger sample of long-period (P ≳ 16 d) transiting brown dwarfs whose eccentricity distribution is inconsistent with the Beta(1.88, 2.47) parent that was used to seed the short-period population would falsify the shared-primordial-distribution premise and therefore the derived Q values.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Brown dwarfs dissipate tidal energy far less efficiently than hot Jupiters, so even short-period systems can preserve orbital signatures of formation.
  • Population-level eccentricity statistics become a practical route to measuring effective tidal quality factors for objects whose individual ages and interior structures are poorly known.
  • The longer-period transiting brown-dwarf sample is kinematically closer to close stellar binaries than to giant planets, favouring a star-like formation channel for the bulk of the present sample.
  • Future transit surveys that enlarge the long-period brown-dwarf census will directly tighten or refute the Q constraints without requiring new tidal theory.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If lower-mass brown dwarfs (near the deuterium-burning limit) form by a different channel, they may possess systematically different Q values that are invisible in the current high-mass-dominated sample.
  • The same hierarchical-plus-tidal-evolution pipeline could be applied to the growing sample of transiting very-low-mass stars to test whether the derived Q continuum is continuous across the hydrogen-burning limit.
  • Because the inferred Q is an effective, frequency-averaged quantity, multi-frequency or resonance-locking models of brown-dwarf interiors may still be consistent with the same population-level numbers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper uniformly re-fits archival RVs for 50 transiting BD/low-mass-star systems (retaining 36 with M_b sin i < 75 M_Jup) and uses a hierarchical Bayesian Beta model to characterise the eccentricity distribution. A KS-selected period cut at 16 days separates a short-period population (N=28) that is skewed toward low e (Beta with α<1, β>1) from a long-period population (N=8) that is more dynamically excited (α,β>1). Under the assumption that both populations share a single primordial eccentricity distribution equal to the observed LP Beta, the authors forward-model tidal evolution with the Wisdom (2008) and Jackson et al. (2008) equilibrium-tide formalisms and minimise KL divergence to the observed SP distribution, obtaining Q_BD = 10^{8.1±1.0} (Model A) or Q_BD = 10^{7.1±0.3} and Q_⋆ = 10^{6.0±0.1} (Model B). They conclude that BDs dissipate tidal energy less efficiently than hot Jupiters and more like low-mass stars, so that even short-period BDs can retain formation-era orbital imprints.

Significance. If the single-primordial-distribution assumption holds, the work supplies one of the first population-level empirical constraints on the effective tidal quality factor of brown dwarfs, placing them intermediate between gas giants and low-mass stars. The uniform RV re-analysis, hierarchical Beta modelling, and transparent forward-modelling pipeline (bootstrap of SP masses/periods, angular-momentum conservation, KL minimisation) are cleanly executed and make the result reproducible. The comparison to CLS giant planets, Gaia binaries, and recent low-mass-star samples usefully situates the BD population. The result is therefore of genuine interest for both tidal theory and formation pathways of the planet–BD continuum, even though the numerical Q values rest on a small LP sample.

major comments (3)
  1. The central Q inference (§4.3 and abstract) treats the LP Beta B(1.879,2.470) as the universal primordial eccentricity distribution for every SP system. That Beta is fit to only N=8 objects (Table 1, Fig. 2). Because every initial eccentricity in the forward model is drawn from this fixed distribution, sampling variance or selection bias in the LP fit propagates directly into the reported Q_BD (and Q_⋆). The paper notes the small LP sample in §5 but still quotes a single point estimate. At minimum the authors should (i) re-draw the LP hyperparameters from their full posterior at each realisation, (ii) report the resulting systematic uncertainty on log Q, and (iii) test an alternative prior (e.g., the full-sample Beta or a thermal distribution) so that the reader can judge how load-bearing the N=8 fit is.
  2. The evolutionary age is fixed at the median 6.5 Gyr for the primary result (§4.3). The authors later show that Q_BD rises monotonically from ~10^{7.6} at 1 Gyr to ~10^{8.3} at 13 Gyr (Model A). Because the true age distribution is broad, a single-age KL minimum understates the uncertainty. Propagating the observed age distribution (or at least a realistic prior) through the same MCMC would give a more honest posterior on Q.
  3. Both tidal models are pure equilibrium-tide prescriptions that omit dynamical tides, inertial-wave dissipation, and resonance locking (explicitly acknowledged in §4). The inferred Q is therefore an effective, frequency-averaged parameter. The abstract and conclusions should state this limitation more prominently so that the numerical values are not over-interpreted as fundamental material constants of BDs.
minor comments (5)
  1. The period threshold is chosen by minimising the one-sided KS p-value over a 1–40 day grid (§3.2). A brief statement of how sensitive the subsequent Beta parameters and Q values are to neighbouring thresholds (e.g., 12 or 20 days) would strengthen the claim that 16 days is robust.
  2. Figure 1 caption and the angular-momentum tracks use e = sqrt(1-(P0/P)^{2/3}); the same relation appears later as P_final = P_initial (1-e0^{2})^{3/2}. A single consistent notation would avoid confusion.
  3. Table 1 reports mean eccentricities with asymmetric Beta-parameter uncertainties; adding the corresponding 16th/84th percentiles of the mean-e posterior would make the table self-contained.
  4. The Love number κ2 appears in Eq. (5) but is never assigned a numerical value or prior; a short statement of the adopted value (or that it is absorbed into the effective Q) is needed.
  5. A few typographical inconsistencies remain (e.g., “T ransiting” in the title line, mixed Q vs. Q' notation early in the introduction). A careful proof-read would clean these up.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: Q is ordinary KL-minimizing fit of external tidal models under an explicit shared-primordial assumption; SP/LP Betas are independent data products.

full rationale

The paper first re-fits RVs uniformly (§2), then independently fits Beta hyperparameters to the SP (N=28) and LP (N=8) eccentricity samples via HBM (§3.2, Table 1). The period split itself is data-driven (KS test). In §4.3 it explicitly assumes the LP Beta B(1.879,2.470) is the common primordial distribution, draws initial e from it, evolves the SP periods/masses under the external Wisdom (2008) or Jackson et al. (2008) equations while varying log Q on a grid, and reports the Q that minimises KL divergence to the independently observed SP Beta. The tidal ODEs and the two eccentricity data products are independent; nothing forces a good match for any particular Q (they simply find one). The assumption is strong and the LP sample small (noted in §5), but that is a modelling/data limitation, not a reduction of the claimed Q to its inputs by construction. No self-citation is load-bearing for uniqueness or the tidal formalisms; no ansatz is smuggled; no fitted quantity is renamed a prediction. Score 1 only for the mild presentation of a conditional fit as a population constraint.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central Q claim rests on (i) the empirical eccentricity split, (ii) the modeling choice that both populations share one primordial Beta equal to the long-period fit, (iii) two standard equilibrium-tide formalisms, (iv) angular-momentum conservation for the initial-period correction, and (v) a fixed evolutionary age. No new physical entities are postulated; free parameters are the fitted Beta shapes, the period threshold, the age, and the Q values themselves.

free parameters (4)
  • Beta hyperparameters (α,β) for SP, LP, and full samples = SP: (0.426^{+0.100}_{-0.084}, 2.354^{+0.807}_{-0.658}); LP: (1.879^{+1.088}_{-0.753}, 2.470^{+1.480}_{-1.018})
    Inferred from hierarchical Bayesian fit to the re-derived eccentricities; the LP values are then used as the primordial distribution for the tidal forward model.
  • Period threshold P_threshold = 16 days
    Chosen by maximizing the one-sided KS statistic between short- and long-period eccentricity samples over a 1–40 d grid; directly defines the two populations whose distributions are compared.
  • Evolutionary age = 6.5 Gyr
    Fixed to the median Gaia DR3 FLAME age of the sample for the primary Q inference; sensitivity checked at 1, 5, 8, 13 Gyr but the quoted Q uses 6.5 Gyr.
  • Q_BD (and Q_⋆ in Model B) = Model A: 10^{8.1±1.0}; Model B: Q_BD=10^{7.1±0.3}, Q_⋆=10^{6.0±0.1}
    Grid-searched and then MCMC-sampled by minimizing KL divergence between evolved and observed SP eccentricity distributions; these are the quantities reported as the central result.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Orbital eccentricities of bound companions are well described by a Beta distribution on [0,1].
    Adopted following Hogg et al. (2010), Kipping (2013) and subsequent exoplanet literature (§3.1); used for all hierarchical fits.
  • domain assumption Wisdom (2008) equilibrium-tide equations (only BD tide, synchronous rotation, low-e expansion) correctly capture the secular ė of the population.
    Model A in §4.1; Love number κ2 and auxiliary eccentricity functions taken as given.
  • domain assumption Jackson et al. (2008) coupled star+planet equilibrium-tide equations correctly capture ė and ȧ.
    Model B in §4.2; constant-Q assumption for both bodies.
  • domain assumption Angular momentum is conserved during circularization, so P_final = P_initial (1-e0²)^{3/2}.
    Used to back-calculate initial periods from observed SP periods (§4.3); neglects possible mass loss or companion ejection at the ~10% level.
  • ad hoc to paper Short-period and long-period transiting BDs share a single primordial eccentricity distribution identical to the observed long-period Beta.
    Explicit modeling premise of §4.3 and the abstract; without it the Q inference has no starting distribution.
  • domain assumption Dynamical tides, inertial-wave dissipation, resonance locking and structural feedback from tidal heating can be neglected or absorbed into an effective constant Q.
    Stated as a limitation in §4 and §5; the reported Q is therefore an ensemble-averaged effective parameter.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 43628 in / 3696 out tokens · 36600 ms · 2026-07-12T07:44:35.936872+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Brown dwarfs on short-period orbits populate an intermediate regime between hot Jupiters and tight stellar binaries, lying at the intersection of possible evolutionary avenues. Their orbital eccentricities retain the dynamical imprint of both their formation pathways and any subsequent tidal evolution, providing a diagnostic for whether such objects formed in situ at small separations or were driven inward from higher-eccentricity orbits shaped by tidal dissipation. Using a hierarchical Bayesian framework, we characterise the orbital eccentricity distribution of transiting brown dwarfs. Short-period brown dwarfs ($P < 16$ days) are well represented by a Beta distribution with $\alpha < 1$ and $\beta > 1$, indicating a population concentrated at low eccentricities, whereas longer-period brown dwarfs ($P \geq 16$ days) display $\alpha,~\beta > 1$ and therefore occupy a more dynamically excited regime. This difference in eccentricity distributions likely reflects corresponding differences in the populations' eccentricity-damping timescales: close-in systems may evolve toward circular orbits on relatively short timescales, whilst wider companions experience negligible tidal processing over their lifetimes. Assuming that the full set of transiting brown dwarfs stems from a single primordial eccentricity distribution, {we constrain the typical brown dwarf tidal quality factor to $\mathcal{Q}_{\rm BD} = 10^{8.1\pm1.0}$ when neglecting the influence of tides raised on the host star, or $\mathcal{Q}_{\rm BD} = 10^{7.1\pm0.3}$ and $\mathcal{Q}_{\star} = 10^{6.0\pm0.1}$ when they are included.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.02682 by Malena Rice, Thiago Ferreira.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Fundamental orbital properties of transiting BDs and low-mass stars inferred from our uniform re-fit of RV time-series in this work (see §2). While our full sample is shown here, only systems with derived Mb sin i < 75MJ are retained for the population-level eccentricity studies pre￾sented in this work. Top panel: Companion mass vs. or￾bital period. Marker sizes are scaled inversely with mean or￾bital ecce… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Empirical cumulative distribution function with shaded 95% confidence intervals for the short-period (P < 16 days; dashed) and long-period (P ≥ 16 days; dotted) BD populations, delineated by a period threshold determined via a KS test and p−value analysis (see §3.2). The full sample CDF is represented as a solid black line. plied the same HBM approach to two different com￾parison samples—namely, Jovian pla… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Eccentricity distributions for transiting BDs (top left panel; this work), divided into short- and long-period sub-pop￾ulations, alongside the eccentricity distributions of directly imaged BDs and gas giant planets (top right panel; B. P. Bowler et al. 2020; C. R. Do O et al. ´ 2023); Jovian planets from the California Legacy Survey, together with long-period giant planets and transiting BDs analysed in T.… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Empirical cumulative distribution functions com￾paring short-period (SP, P < 16 days) and long-period (LP, P ≥ 16 days) transiting BDs (solid lines) with various com￾parison samples (dashed lines): short-period (N = 54) and long-period (N = 113) giant planets from the California Legacy Survey, eccentricity distributions for transiting low– mass stars (M⋆ ∈ [80, 150] MJup; N = 15) from T. Gan et al. (2025),… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Eccentricity distributions for transiting BDs after 6.5 Gyr of tidal evolution following the J. Wisdom (2008) model (first panel; model A) and the B. Jackson et al. (2008) model (second panel; model B). The coloured curves show the evolved dis￾tributions for different BD tidal quality factors QBD ranging from 101 to 1010 (first panel) and grid combinations of Q⋆ = 106−109 and QBD = 106 − 109 (second panel)… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Eccentricity distributions for BDs as a function of mass for tidal quality factors of log10(Q) = 6 − 10 with steps of δ log10(Q) = 0.5, after 6.5 Gyr of tidal evolution under the J. Wisdom (2008) framework (Model A; §4.1). Each population begins, before tidal evolution, with an eccentricity distribution set to match the LP BD Beta distribution. The present-day observed LP and SP BD Beta distributions are i… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Phase-folded radial velocity diagrams for the transiting systems: NGTS-7 A b (J. A. G. Jackman et al. 2019), AD 3116 b (E. Gillen et al. 2017), CoRoT-3 b (M. Deleuil et al. 2008), CoRoT-15 b (F. Bouchy et al. 2011a), CoRoT-33 b (S. Csizmadia et al. 2015), CoRoT-34 b (D. Sebastian et al. 2022), CWW 89 A b (T. G. Beatty et al. 2018), ELM-J0555-57 A b (A. von Boetticher et al. 2017), EPIC 201702477 b (D. Bayl… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (Continued) KOI-415 b (C. Moutou et al. 2013), KOI-607 b (T. W. Carmichael et al. 2019), LHS 6343 C (J. A. Johnson et al. 2011), LP 261-75 b (J. M. Irwin et al. 2018), NGTS-19 b (J. S. Acton et al. 2021), NGTS-28 A b (B. A. Henderson et al. 2024a), NLTT 41135 b (J. Irwin et al. 2010), OGLE-TR-123 b (F. Pont et al. 2006), TOI-263 b (E. Palle et al. 2021), TOI-503 b (J. Subjak et al. ˇ 2020), TOI-569 b (T. W… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (Continued) TOI-811 b (T. W. Carmichael et al. 2021), Kepler-39 b (F. Bouchy et al. 2011b), KOI-189 b (R. F. D´ıaz et al. 2014), KOI-205 b (A. S. Bonomo et al. 2015), TOI-852 b (T. W. Carmichael et al. 2021), TOI-1278 b (E. Artigau ´ et al. 2021), TOI-1406 b (T. W. Carmichael et al. 2020), TOI-2521 b, TOI-2336 b, TOI-1608 b (Z. Lin et al. 2023), TOI-2543 b, TOI-1982 b (A. Psaridi et al. 2022), TOI-2119 b (… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

271 extracted references · 128 canonical work pages · 109 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , year = 1963, month = may, volume =

    The Structure of Stars of Very Low Mass. , year = 1963, month = may, volume =. doi:10.1086/147589 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/147589 1963

  2. [2]

    , year = 1919, month = apr, volume =

    The origin of binary systems. , year = 1919, month = apr, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/79.6.408 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/79.6.408 1919

  3. [3]

    , year = 1963, month = may, volume =

    The Helmholtz-Kelvin Time Scale for Stars of Very Low Mass. , year = 1963, month = may, volume =. doi:10.1086/147590 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/147590 1963

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    A Nongray Theory of Extrasolar Giant Planets and Brown Dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/305002 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9705201 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/305002

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Origins of Hot Jupiters. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051853 , archivePrefix =. 1801.06117 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051853

  6. [6]

    Population-Level Eccentricity Distributions of Imaged Exoplanets and Brown Dwarf Companions: Dynamical Evidence for Distinct Formation Channels

    Population-level Eccentricity Distributions of Imaged Exoplanets and Brown Dwarf Companions: Dynamical Evidence for Distinct Formation Channels. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab5b11 , archivePrefix =. 1911.10569 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab5b11 1911

  7. [7]

    Statistical Properties of Brown Dwarf Companions: Implications for Different Formation Mechanisms

    Statistical properties of brown dwarf companions: implications for different formation mechanisms. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu134 , archivePrefix =. 1303.6442 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stu134

  8. [8]

    , year = 1996, month = nov, volume =

    Formation of the Giant Planets by Concurrent Accretion of Solids and Gas. , year = 1996, month = nov, volume =. doi:10.1006/icar.1996.0190 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1006/icar.1996.0190 1996

  9. [9]

    A Tale of Planet Formation: From Dust to Planets

    A tale of planet formation: from dust to planets. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/20/10/164 , archivePrefix =. 2009.02321 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1674-4527/20/10/164 2009

  10. [10]

    New constraints on the minimum mass for thermonuclear lithium burning in brown dwarfs

    New constraints on the minimum mass for thermonuclear lithium burning in brown dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2969 , archivePrefix =. 2110.11982 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2969

  11. [11]

    The High Eccentricity of the Planet Around 16 Cyg B

    The High Eccentricity of the Planet Orbiting 16 Cygni B. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/310536 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9611135 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/310536

  12. [12]

    Eccentricities of Planets in Binary Systems

    Eccentricities of Planets in Binary Systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10509-006-9120-1 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0510296 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s10509-006-9120-1

  13. [13]

    The same frequency of planets inside and outside open clusters of stars

    The same frequency of planets inside and outside open clusters of stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature12279 , archivePrefix =. 1307.5842 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/nature12279

  14. [14]

    Stellar clustering shapes the architectures of planetary systems

    Stellar clustering shapes the architecture of planetary systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2800-0 , archivePrefix =. 2010.10531 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2800-0 2010

  15. [15]

    Planet-planet scattering as the source of the highest eccentricity exoplanets

    Planet-planet scattering as the source of the highest eccentricity exoplanets. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935744 , archivePrefix =. 1903.02564 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935744 1903

  16. [16]

    Planet-planet scattering in presence of a companion star

    Planet-planet scattering in presence of a companion star. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3602 , archivePrefix =. 2112.05012 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3602

  17. [17]

    A Tendency Toward Alignment in Single-Star Warm Jupiter Systems

    A Tendency Toward Alignment in Single-star Warm-Jupiter Systems. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac8153 , archivePrefix =. 2207.06511 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac8153

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    Single-star Warm-Jupiter Systems Tend to Be Aligned, Even around Hot Stellar Hosts: No T _ eff Dependency. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad7469 , archivePrefix =. 2408.10038 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad7469 2041

  19. [19]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Evidence for a Peak at 0.3 in the Eccentricity Distribution of Typical Super-Jovian Exoplanets. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.18877 , archivePrefix =. 2601.18877 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.18877

  20. [20]

    Evidence for Low-Level Dynamical Excitation in Near-Resonant Exoplanet Systems

    Evidence for Low-level Dynamical Excitation in Near-resonant Exoplanet Systems. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad09de , archivePrefix =. 2311.02478 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad09de

  21. [21]

    Evidence for Primordial Alignment: Insights from Stellar Obliquity Measurements for Compact Sub-Saturn Systems

    Evidence for Primordial Alignment: Insights from Stellar Obliquity Measurements for Compact Sub-Saturn Systems. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad61d8 , archivePrefix =. 2404.06504 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad61d8

  22. [22]

    One-third of Sun-like stars are born with misaligned planet-forming disks

    One-third of Sun-like stars are born with misaligned planet-forming disks. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09324-0 , archivePrefix =. 2508.06488 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09324-0

  23. [23]

    Mean motion resonances at high eccentricities: the 2:1 and the 3:2 interior resonances

    Mean Motion Resonances at High Eccentricities: The 2:1 and the 3:2 Interior Resonances. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa762b , archivePrefix =. 1702.02137 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa762b

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    Mean motion resonance capture in the context of type I migration. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244460 , archivePrefix =. 2211.06181 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244460

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    Hot Jupiters from Coplanar High-eccentricity Migration. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/75 , archivePrefix =. 1409.8296 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/805/1/75

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    The Eccentric Kozai-Lidov Effect and Its Applications. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315 , archivePrefix =. 1601.07175 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315

  27. [27]

    Monographs on Environment, Earth and Planets , keywords =

    The Lidov-Kozai Oscillation and Hugo von Zeipel. Monographs on Environment, Earth and Planets , keywords =. doi:10.5047/meep.2019.00701.0001 , archivePrefix =. 1911.03984 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.5047/meep.2019.00701.0001 2019

  28. [28]

    The Hamiltonian for von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai oscillations

    The Hamiltonian for von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai oscillations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1029 , archivePrefix =. 2304.01257 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1029

  29. [29]

    The influence of general-relativity effects, dynamical tides and collisions on planet-planet scattering close to the star

    Influence of general-relativity effects, dynamical tides, and collisions on planet-planet scattering close to the star. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935065 , archivePrefix =. 1904.01420 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935065 1904

  30. [30]

    Secular evolution of close in planets: the effects of general relativity

    Secular evolution of close-in planets: the effects of general relativity. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa271 , archivePrefix =. 2001.09801 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/staa271 2001

  31. [31]

    Nodal Precession in Closely Spaced Planet Pairs

    Nodal Precession in Closely Spaced Planet Pairs. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab83f0 , archivePrefix =. 2003.07835 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab83f0 2003

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    On the evolution of eccentric and inclined protoplanets embedded in protoplanetary disks. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077666 , archivePrefix =. 0707.2225 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077666

  33. [33]

    Eccentricity driving of pebble accreting low-mass planets

    Eccentricity driving of pebble accreting low-mass planets. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3334 , archivePrefix =. 2111.11070 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3334

  34. [34]

    Kinematic signatures of a low-mass planet with a moderately inclined orbit in a protoplanetary disk

    Kinematic signatures of a low-mass planet with a moderately inclined orbit in a protoplanetary disk. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/pasj/psad059 , archivePrefix =. 2308.12144 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/pasj/psad059

  35. [35]

    Estimating the depth of gaps opened by planets in eccentric orbit

    Estimating the depth of gaps opened by planets in eccentric orbit. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2856 , archivePrefix =. 2210.09008 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2856

  36. [36]

    , year = 1962, month = nov, volume =

    Secular perturbations of asteroids with high inclination and eccentricity. , year = 1962, month = nov, volume =. doi:10.1086/108790 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/108790 1962

  37. [37]

    , year = 1962, month = oct, volume =

    The evolution of orbits of artificial satellites of planets under the action of gravitational perturbations of external bodies. , year = 1962, month = oct, volume =. doi:10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0 1962

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    The Orbital Eccentricity of Small Planet Systems. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaf22f , archivePrefix =. 1807.00549 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaf22f

  39. [39]

    Dynamics of Planetary Systems

  40. [40]

    Extreme Solar Systems , year = 2008, editor =

    Giant Planet Formation by Core Accretion. Extreme Solar Systems , year = 2008, editor =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.0710.5667 , archivePrefix =. 0710.5667 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0710.5667 2008

  41. [41]

    Structure and evolution of super-Earth to super-Jupiter exoplanets. I. Heavy element enrichment in the interior. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20079321 , archivePrefix =. 0802.1810 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20079321

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    Deuterium Burning in Massive Giant Planets and Low-mass Brown Dwarfs Formed by Core-nucleated Accretion. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/120 , archivePrefix =. 1305.0980 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/2/120

  43. [43]

    Reports on Progress in Physics , keywords =

    The physics of star formation. Reports on Progress in Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/66/10/R03 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0306595 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0034-4885/66/10/r03

  44. [44]

    , keywords =

    The Origin of Binary Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093810 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093810

  45. [45]

    The Eccentricity-Mass Distribution of Exoplanets: Signatures of Different Formation Mechanisms?

    The eccentricity-mass distribution of exoplanets: signatures of different formation mechanisms?. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065726 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0606009 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065726

  46. [46]

    Eccentricity distribution of wide binaries

    Eccentricity distribution of wide binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2825 , archivePrefix =. 1512.00278 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2825

  47. [47]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The No-U-Turn Sampler: Adaptively Setting Path Lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1111.4246 , archivePrefix =. 1111.4246 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1111.4246

  48. [48]

    PyMC3: Python probabilistic programming framework

  49. [49]

    Statistical Science , year = 1992, month = jan, volume =

    Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences. Statistical Science , year = 1992, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1214/ss/1177011136 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1214/ss/1177011136 1992

  50. [50]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian models. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1307.5928 , archivePrefix =. 1307.5928 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1307.5928

  51. [51]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1507.04544 , archivePrefix =. 1507.04544 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1507.04544

  52. [52]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Asymptotic Equivalence of Bayes Cross Validation and Widely Applicable Information Criterion in Singular Learning Theory. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1004.2316 , archivePrefix =. 1004.2316 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1004.2316

  53. [53]

    , keywords =

    Exoplanet Population Inference and the Abundance of Earth Analogs from Noisy, Incomplete Catalogs. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/64 , archivePrefix =. 1406.3020 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/795/1/64

  54. [54]

    , keywords =

    Inferring the Eccentricity Distribution. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/2166 , archivePrefix =. 1008.4146 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/725/2/2166

  55. [55]

    , keywords =

    Parametrizing the exoplanet eccentricity distribution with the beta distribution. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slt075 , archivePrefix =. 1306.4982 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slt075

  56. [56]

    The Orbital Eccentricities of Directly Imaged Companions Using Observable-Based Priors: Implications for Population-level Distributions

    The Orbital Eccentricities of Directly Imaged Companions Using Observable-based Priors: Implications for Population-level Distributions. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acdc9a , archivePrefix =. 2306.04080 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acdc9a

  57. [57]

    Science , keywords =

    Dynamical instabilities and the formation of extrasolar planetary systems. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.274.5289.954 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1126/science.274.5289.954

  58. [58]

    Long period planets from dynamical relaxation

    Long-Period Exoplanets From Dynamical Relaxation. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/693/2/L113 , archivePrefix =. 0811.1981 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/693/2/l113 1981

  59. [59]

    , year = 1937, month = jan, volume =

    On the Statistics of Double Stars. , year = 1937, month = jan, volume =

    1937

  60. [60]

    Bayesian Data Analysis

  61. [61]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Pareto Smoothed Importance Sampling. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1507.02646 , archivePrefix =. 1507.02646 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1507.02646

  62. [62]

    Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences , keywords =

    Planetesimals to Brown Dwarfs: What is a Planet?. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.34.031405.125058 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0608417 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.34.031405.125058

  63. [63]

    doi:10.1007/3-540-27610-6 , adsurl =

    New light on dark stars : red dwarfs, low-mass stars, brown dwarfs. doi:10.1007/3-540-27610-6 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-27610-6

  64. [64]

    The case of HD 209458

    Evolutionary models for cool brown dwarfs and extrasolar giant planets. The case of HD 209458. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030252 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0302293 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030252

  65. [65]

    , keywords =

    Improved radius determinations for the transiting brown dwarf population in the era of Gaia and TESS. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3720 , archivePrefix =. 2212.02502 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3720

  66. [66]

    , keywords =

    A Hierarchical Bayesian Framework for Inferring the Stellar Obliquity Distribution. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ace105 , archivePrefix =. 2305.14220 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ace105

  67. [67]

    The BANANA Project. VI. Close Double Stars are Well Aligned with Noticeable Exceptions; Results from an Ensemble Study Using Apsidal Motion and Rossiter-McLaughlin Measurements. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac75c2 , archivePrefix =. 2112.00824 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac75c2

  68. [68]

    Table of integrals, series and products

  69. [69]

    and Anderson, D.R

    Burnham, K.P. and Anderson, D.R. , biburl =. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach , username =

  70. [70]

    , year = 1966, month = jan, volume =

    Q in the Solar System. , year = 1966, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(66)90051-0 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1016/0019-1035(66)90051-0 1966

  71. [71]

    , keywords =

    The formation of planetary systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07417.x , adsurl =

    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07417.x 2004

  72. [72]

    , keywords =

    Tidal decay and orbital circularization in close-in two-planet systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18861.x , archivePrefix =. 1104.0964 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18861.x 2011

  73. [73]

    Tidal Evolution of Close-in Exoplanets and Host Stars

    Tidal evolution of close-in exoplanets and host stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1777 , archivePrefix =. 2306.13220 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1777

  74. [74]

    , year = 2007, month = jun, volume =

    A new catalogue of eclipsing binary stars with eccentric orbits*. , year = 2007, month = jun, volume =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11756.x , adsurl =

    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11756.x 2007

  75. [75]

    , keywords =

    Verification of Gaia Data Release 3 Single-lined Spectroscopic Binary Solutions With Three Transiting Low-mass Secondaries. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad0135 , archivePrefix =. 2310.07936 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad0135

  76. [76]

    Lifetime of short-period binaries measured from their Galactic kinematics

    Lifetime of short-period binaries measured from their Galactic kinematics. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa400 , archivePrefix =. 1909.06375 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/staa400 1909

  77. [77]

    , keywords =

    Shrinking Binary and Planetary Orbits by Kozai Cycles with Tidal Friction. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/521702 , archivePrefix =. 0705.4285 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/521702

  78. [78]

    , keywords =

    Orbital Evolution in Binary and Triple Stars, with an Application to SS Lacertae. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/323843 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0104126 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/323843

  79. [79]

    The mystery in Gaia DR3 triples: occurrence rates, orientations, and eccentricities of wide tertiaries around close binaries

    The mystery in Gaia DR3 triples: occurrence rates, orientations, and eccentricities of wide tertiaries around close binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3116 , archivePrefix =. 2208.02257 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3116

  80. [80]

    American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , year = 2022, series =

    The Impact of Bayesian Hyperpriors on the Population-Level Eccentricity Distribution of Imaged Planets. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , year = 2022, series =

    2022

Showing first 80 references.