Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 129 references

Neural ODEs invert fermionic spectra into effective black-hole geometries, revealing that cuprate nodal spectra select a conformal-to-AdS2×R2 class while leaving the conformal factor and Hawking temperature undetermined.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 08:54 UTC pith:FP44AX7A

load-bearing objection A solid inverse-problem paper for fermionic holographic spectra, with honest non-uniqueness analysis; the main phenomenological conclusion rests on an untested massless-probe assumption. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.02861 v2 pith:FP44AX7A submitted 2026-07-03 hep-th cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-congr-qc

Holographic Learning from Fermionic Spectra: Application to Strange Metal Phenomenology

classification hep-th cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-congr-qc
keywords Neural ODEholographic inverse problemfermionic spectral functionstrange metalcuprate superconductorssemi-holographyAdS2/CFT1extended power-law liquid
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a data-driven inverse holographic map: from frequency- and momentum-resolved fermionic spectral functions, it learns the metric functions and the charge-weighted gauge potential of a static planar black hole using Neural ODEs to evolve the Dirac equation radially. After validating on the Einstein–Maxwell and Gubser–Rocha models with sub-percent reconstruction error, it applies the method to the normalized nodal spectral data of a cuprate strange metal described by an extended power-law liquid model. At low temperature and near-optimal doping, the learned effective geometries sit close to the conformal-to-AdS2×R2 black-hole class, with nearly vanishing qA_t (about 10^-4 eV). Because the probe fermion is massless, the conformal factor is invisible, and spectral normalization introduces a degeneracy in the scaled Hawking temperature, so the paper concludes that fermionic spectra fix only the conformal class of the bulk, not its thermodynamics. This defines exactly what single-particle spectra can and cannot determine about a holographic dual.

Core claim

The central claim is that the inverse problem of reconstructing a holographic bulk from single-fermion spectral functions is well-posed only up to two structural degeneracies: a coordinate/Weyl redundancy due to the massless probe (the conformal factor drops out of the Dirac equation) and a temperature degeneracy introduced by spectral normalization (the normalized spectral function of an exact AdS2×R2 black hole is independent of the Hawking temperature). Working within a conformal-to-AdS2×R2 ansatz, the paper finds that the normalized extended-PLL target for the near-optimally doped sample at T=8 K is reproduced with loss 2×10^-8, and the learned gauge-invariant content—the constant spatia

What carries the argument

The central object is the Neural-ODE inverse map: the three unknown bulk functions (metric functions f and h, and the charge-weighted gauge potential qA_t) are each represented by a small fully-connected network, and the radial Dirac flow equations are integrated from horizon to boundary to predict the spectral function. Two technical ingredients carry the analysis: a flux-based extraction formula for Im G_k that bypasses the subleading response coefficient in conformal-to-AdS2 asymptotics, and a gauge-fixing procedure that maps h(z) to its constant boundary value h0, leaving the gauge-invariant blackening factor F(u) and the transported qA_t(u) as the only spectroscopically meaningful conte

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the probe fermion is massless (m=0), introduced to keep the momentum-scaling exponent ν_k ∝ k; this is what makes the conformal factor invisible to the spectra and therefore what prevents fermionic data from fixing thermodynamics—if the true composite operator carries a nonzero mass or anomalous dimension, the conformal factor becomes in principle measurable.

What would settle it

A concrete test: allow m≠0 in the inverse map and check whether the normalized extended-PLL spectra can still be fit with a nonlinear ν_k(k) that depends on the conformal factor; if so, the conformal factor is identifiable and the paper's claim about thermodynamics underdetermination fails. Alternatively, measure the specific heat of the same Bi2201 sample and compare two geometries that produce identical fermionic spectra but different conformal factors—if the spectra alone determine which geometry is correct, the non-uniqueness claim is falsified.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the claim holds, ARPES-style single-particle spectra determine only the conformal class of the dual geometry (h0 and F(u)), never the full metric or the absolute temperature scale.
  • Cuprate nodal strange-metal spectra at low temperature are consistent with an emergent conformal-to-AdS2×R2 quantum-critical sector with negligible charge density (qA_t ~ 10^-4 eV), supporting the semi-holographic picture and particle-hole symmetry.
  • Thermodynamic observables such as entropy density and electronic specific heat cannot be inferred from fermionic spectra alone within this framework; independent macroscopic input is required to fix the conformal factor at the horizon.
  • The framework remains viable across the studied doping range at low temperature, with only a mild increase in loss toward the overdoped side, but breaks down at elevated temperatures, where the conformal-to-AdS2 ansatz becomes strained and qA_t grows.
  • The normalized spectral function is invariant under changes of the scaled Hawking temperature in the exact AdS2×R2 limit, implying that any fitted TH from spectral data is not physically determined.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural testable extension: allow a nonzero fermion mass in the inverse problem. If the extended-PLL spectra still fit with a nonlinear ν_k(k) that depends on the conformal factor, the conformal factor becomes identifiable and the paper's non-uniqueness conclusion would be overturned.
  • The temperature degeneracy likely generalizes to other normalized holographic observables (e.g., conductivity ratios), suggesting a broad principle: normalization erases absolute energy-scale information in conformal-to-AdS2 duals.
  • The high-temperature failure suggests that the semi-holographic decomposition itself, or the assumption of a temperature-independent coupling gk, needs revision; the data-driven method could be used to search for the minimal modification that restores a good fit.
  • The flux-based extraction formula could be reused in any holographic setup where the leading response coefficient is subleading, extending inverse-problem techniques beyond asymptotically AdS4 fermions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Neural ODE framework that inverts boundary fermionic spectral functions into effective bulk metric functions f(z), h(z), and the charge-weighted gauge potential qA_t(z) for static planar black holes, using two bulk ansätze: asymptotically AdS4 and conformal-to-AdS2×R2. The method is first validated on Einstein–Maxwell and Gubser–Rocha models, where it recovers the known bulk fields with MREs of 0.01–0.4%. It is then applied to normalized extended-PLL spectral targets calibrated by cuprate ARPES data. For the low-temperature near-optimal sample UD32K, the learned geometry is close to a conformal-to-AdS2×R2 black hole with qA_t ~ 10^{-4} eV, h0 fixing the PLL exponent α, and a blackening factor F(u) close to the AdS2 form. The paper identifies two sources of non-uniqueness: the massless probe fermion is insensitive to the conformal factor, and spectral normalization induces a degeneracy in the scaled Hawking temperature TH. It concludes that thermodynamics (e.g., the entropy density s(T) ∝ Ω(1,T)h(1,T)) is not fixed by the fermionic spectra. At higher temperatures or farther overdoping, the fits degrade monotonically.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a significant methodological contribution: it demonstrates a practical inverse map from single-fermion spectral functions to effective bulk fields, validated at sub-percent level on two analytically known models, and it provides a transparent treatment of degeneracies. The flux-based extraction formula for spectral functions in conformal-to-AdS2×R2 asymptotics is a useful technical innovation, and the temperature-degeneracy theorem in Appendix E is clean and machine-checkable. The synthetic conformal-to-AdS2×R2 test with injected qA_t profiles, recovered to ≲1% after temperature mapping, is a strong controlled validation of the massless pipeline. The paper is also commendably honest in reporting the limited in-sample nature of the phenomenological fits and in flagging the massless-probe assumption as a structural condition. The central caveat is that the thermodynamic non-uniqueness conclusion rests on the imposed m=0 choice, which is not derived from the data or tested against an m≠0 alternative.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, Eq. (4.15); Section 6.3 point 2; Abstract] The massless-probe assumption m=0 is imposed, not fitted or derived, and it is load-bearing for the claim that fermionic spectra cannot constrain the conformal factor and hence thermodynamics. Eq. (4.15) shows that for m≠0 the scaling exponent ν_k = sqrt(k^2/(fh) + m^2Ω/f)|_{z→0} becomes nonlinear in k and couples Ω(z) into the master equations (4.7); a nonzero-mass inversion could in principle constrain Ω(z) and therefore s(T) ∝ Ω(1,T)h(1,T) (Eq. 6.14). The paper states in Sec. 7 that relaxing m=0 is future work, but the abstract and Sec. 6.3 present the conformal-factor invisibility as a structural implication, not a conditional statement. Please either perform an m≠0 inversion on the same extended-PLL data (e.g., treat m as a free parameter and test whether Ω becomes constrained) or strictly qualify the thermodynamic non-uniqueness as a property of the massless-probe sector; in the la
  2. [Section 6.3, Table 2] All losses and χ MREs reported for the extended-PLL fits are in-sample values on the training (ω,k) grid. With three MLPs of 141 parameters each (423 total) and 800 data points, the extremely low training loss (2×10^{-8}) does not by itself demonstrate that the learned geometry is the effective geometry rather than a high-capacity interpolation artifact. The doping- and temperature-trend claims (e.g., 'mild increase in loss toward the overdoped side') rest on these in-sample numbers. A held-out validation, e.g., a random 20% spectral subset or a k-fold procedure, should be reported, together with the stability of the extracted h0, F(u), and qA_t under such splitting.
  3. [Section 6.3, Figs. 6–9] The central phenomenological claim that F(u) is 'close to' the AdS2 black-hole form Eq. (6.13) is supported only by visual comparison. No quantitative deviation metric (e.g., L2 norm or MRE of F(u) relative to the best-fit T*_H) is provided, nor are error bars on T*_H across the five final candidates. Given that this closeness is the basis for the AdS2×R2 consistency statement, a numerical measure with uncertainty is needed for each sample and temperature.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 6.3, Eq. (6.9) and footnote 8] The reference frequency ℏω0 = -0.01 eV lies at the edge of the training window. The paper notes that exact invariance holds if the fit is exact, but for the reported finite-accuracy fits, a scan over ω0 (e.g., -0.05, -0.02, -0.01 eV) would demonstrate that the extracted geometry does not depend on this choice.
  2. [Appendix E, Eq. (E.4)] The temperature-degeneracy proof is clear and correct for exact AdS2×R2 black holes with the same h0 and qA_t transported by Eq. (E.6). It would be helpful to state explicitly in the proof that the degeneracy requires fixed h0; otherwise a reader might infer a degeneracy in the full metric, whereas h0 remains pinned by the k-dependence of the spectrum.
  3. [Section 2, Eq. (2.16)] The positivity argument for Im G22 is elegant. The same argument is extended to Im G_k in Appendix B via the conserved flux. It may be worth citing this flux argument in Section 3.3 when introducing Eq. (3.13), to avoid the impression that the extraction formula is an ad hoc numerical trick.
  4. [Notation] The symbol z_− is used both as a spinor component and, in Appendix E, as the coordinate z; the subscript/superscript distinction is occasionally hard to parse in Eqs. (3.11), (4.7), and (B.4). A typesetting clarification would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; inverse-map validation is self-contained, with the massless-probe limitation transparently stated.

full rationale

The central derivation is not circular. The Neural-ODE inverse map is validated against two analytic holographic models (Einstein-Maxwell and Gubser-Rocha) with nonzero fermion mass, recovering the known bulk profiles to sub-percent MRE (Table 1); this gives the reconstruction pipeline independent, external content. The cuprate application is an explicit inverse fit within a stated ansatz, and the paper is transparent that the massless-probe condition is imposed: Sec. 4 says 'To maintain consistency with this linear scaling—which underpins the momentum-dependent exponent α(k) in Eq. (3.5)—we set m = 0.' Equation (4.15) then makes ν_k linear and removes the conformal factor from the Dirac equation, so the conclusions about conformal-factor invisibility and undetermined thermodynamics are conditional on that assumption. This is a clearly stated limitation (Sec. 7 lists relaxing the massless Dirac dynamics as future work), not a circular derivation, because the paper does not claim to derive masslessness from the data. The reported agreement ν_kF ≈ α is a consistency check rather than an independent prediction: the massless ansatz fixes only the functional form of ν_k, while h0 is learned from the full normalized spectrum, and the fit loss is very small. The temperature degeneracy is proven analytically in Appendix E rather than obtained by fitting. Self-citations (e.g., Ref. [124] for the loss function and unit map) are methodological and non-load-bearing; no uniqueness of the bulk geometry rests on the authors' prior work. Score 2 reflects minor self-citation and a slightly overstated abstract phrase ('key structural observation' for an imposed condition), not actual circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the probe-limit semi-holographic decomposition, the massless-probe choice, and the prescribed static-planar ansatz. Free parameters are dominated by the degenerate T_H label and the trained neural-network weights rather than physically fitted constants; the q/µ baseline is a comparison diagnostic. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are posited.

free parameters (5)
  • Scaled Hawking temperature T_H = -f'(1)/(4π) = not uniquely fixed; fits place 2πT_H in ~[0.2,1] (App. E)
    The normalized spectral function is invariant under the reparametrization (E.4)-(E.5), so T_H is degenerate; the effective-geometry family contains it as a free label. This is a core non-uniqueness result, not an error.
  • AdS2 black-hole baseline fit parameter T*_H in Eq. (6.13) = e.g. 0.0392 (as quoted in Fig. 6)
    Used only to diagnose how close the gauge-fixed F(u) is to the AdS2 black hole; a fitted diagnostic, not a physical output.
  • q/µ in the analytical Gubser–Rocha baseline = fitted separately per target (Table 2 caption)
    The comparison baseline tunes ν_k=2qk/µ to each target; included for completeness but not used in the Neural-ODE central result.
  • Reference frequency ℏω0 = -0.01 eV
    Normalization point chosen by hand; in exact fits the result is independent, but finite fits inherit some dependence.
  • Neural-network weights for n_f, n_h, n_a = not listed; ~141 per network, trained per sample
    Optimization variables of the data-driven fit. They are fit to the spectral data (800 points) and are not physical constants; the large parameter count is mitigated by smoothness and seed-averaging.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Holographic dictionary: retarded boundary fermionic Green's function is computed from the bulk Dirac equation with in-falling horizon conditions (Eqs. 2.7-2.14).
    Standard AdS/CFT prescription [41]; the inverse method trusts this mapping.
  • domain assumption Probe limit: the bulk Dirac fermion is a test field that does not backreact on the metric or gauge field; spectral functions are linear response.
    Assumed throughout; the learned f,h,qAt are effective fields seen by the probe.
  • domain assumption Semi-holographic decomposition: Σ(ω,k) = -g_k^2 G_k(ω) with real, momentum-dependent, frequency-independent coupling g_k (Eq. 3.8).
    Taken from Refs. [65-68,74]; underlies the mapping from ARPES self-energy to holographic IR Green's function.
  • domain assumption Extended-PLL model (Eqs. 3.4-3.5) with α(k)=α[1-(k-kF)/kF] and ARPES-derived parameters is an accurate target for the nodal self-energy.
    The target is model-generated, not raw ARPES data; the inversion inherits the PLL model's validity.
  • ad hoc to paper Massless probe m=0.
    Set in Sec. 4 to restore ν_k ∝ k and match the linear α(k); this choice makes the conformal factor invisible and is the core of the non-uniqueness/thermodynamics claim.
  • ad hoc to paper The bulk belongs to the static planar-symmetric ansatz Eqs. (4.1)-(4.6) with f=(1-z)e^{z n_f}, h=e^{n_h}, qAt=(1-z)n_a^2 (sign-definite prior).
    The geometric family searched over is prescribed; if the true effective dual lies outside it, conclusions change. The sign prior is later tested.
  • domain assumption Unit identification kBT = -ℏ c r_h f'(1)/(4π L^2) and ω_bulk = T_H × ℏω/(kBT) (Eq. 6.12).
    Standard holographic temperature map; needed to translate ARPES energies into bulk variables and quote qAt in eV.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 36229 in / 20550 out tokens · 207318 ms · 2026-08-02T08:54:40.899145+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We develop a data-driven framework based on Neural ODEs that learns the effective bulk metric functions and the charge-weighted gauge potential $qA_t$ of a static, planar-symmetric black hole from boundary fermionic spectral functions. After validating the framework on the Einstein--Maxwell and Gubser--Rocha models with high accuracy, we apply it to the nodal strange-metal phenomenology of the cuprate $\mathrm{(Pb,Bi)_2Sr_{2-x}La_xCuO_{6+\delta}}$ within a semi-holographic setting, taking as input the normalized target generated from the extended power-law liquid (PLL) model calibrated by angle-resolved photoemission measurements. A key structural observation is that our probe fermion is massless and therefore insensitive to the conformal factor, leading to a coordinate/Weyl redundancy, while spectral normalization introduces a degeneracy in the scaled Hawking temperature. After identifying these sources of nonuniqueness, we find that, at low temperatures and near-optimal doping, the normalized extended-PLL target can be well described by a family of effective geometries close to the conformal-to-$\mathrm{AdS}_{2}\times\mathbb{R}^{2}$ black-hole class, with a nearly vanishing $qA_t$ ($\sim10^{-4}\,\mathrm{eV}$). The conformal-factor ambiguity further implies that fixing macroscopic thermodynamics such as the electronic specific heat requires independent input beyond the fermionic spectra. We also examine the applicability of our framework across doping and temperature: at low temperatures, the learned effective model remains viable throughout the studied doping range, with only a mild increase in loss toward the overdoped side; at higher temperatures, however, both the loss and $qA_t$ increase substantially.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

129 extracted references · 77 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Landau, On the theory of the Fermi liquid , Sov

    L.D. Landau, On the theory of the Fermi liquid , Sov. Phys. JETP 8 (1959) 70

  2. [2]

    Keimer, S

    B. Keimer, S. Kivelson, M. Norman, S. Uchida and J. Zaanen, From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides , Nature 518 (2015) 179

  3. [3]

    Phillips, N.E

    P.W. Phillips, N.E. Hussey and P. Abbamonte, Stranger than metals , Science 377 (2022) eabh4273

  4. [4]

    Gurvitch and A.T

    M. Gurvitch and A.T. Fiory, Resistivity of La1.825Sr0.175CuO4 and YBa2Cu3O7 to 1100 K: Absence of saturation and its implications , Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 1337

  5. [5]

    Chien, Z

    T. Chien, Z. Wang and N. Ong, Effect of Zn impurities on the normal-state Hall angle in single-crystal YBa2Cu3−xZnxO7−δ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 2088

  6. [6]

    Carrington, A.P

    A. Carrington, A.P. Mackenzie, C.T. Lin and J.R. Cooper, Temperature dependence of the Hall angle in single-crystal YBa2(Cu1−x Cox )3O7−δ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 2855

  7. [7]

    Michon, C

    B. Michon, C. Girod, S. Badoux, J. Kačmarčík, Q. Ma, M. Dragomir et al., Thermodynamic signatures of quantum criticality in cuprate superconductors , Nature 567 (2019) 218

  8. [8]

    Girod, D

    C. Girod, D. LeBoeuf, A. Demuer, G. Seyfarth, S. Imajo, K. Kindo et al., Normal state specific heat in the cuprate superconductors La2−x Srx CuO4 and Bi2+y Sr2−x −y Lax CuO6+δ near the critical point of the pseudogap phase , Phys. Rev. B 103 (2021) 214506

  9. [9]

    H. v. Lohneysen, A. Rosch, M. Vojta and P. Wolfle, Fermi-liquid instabilities at magnetic quantum phase transitions , Rev. Mod. Phys. 79 (2007) 1015

  10. [10]

    Hartnoll and A.P

    S.A. Hartnoll and A.P. Mackenzie, Colloquium: Planckian dissipation in metals , Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (2022) 041002 [2107.07802]

  11. [11]

    Zaanen, Why the temperature is high , Nature 430 (2004) 512

    J. Zaanen, Why the temperature is high , Nature 430 (2004) 512

  12. [12]

    Patel and S

    A.A. Patel and S. Sachdev, Theory of a Planckian Metal , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 066601

  13. [13]

    Jin, N.P

    K. Jin, N.P. Butch, K. Kirshenbaum, J. Paglione and R.L. Greene, Link between spin fluctuations and electron pairing in copper oxide superconductors , Nature 476 (2011) 73

  14. [14]

    J. Yuan, Q. Chen, K. Jiang, Z. Feng, Z. Lin, H. Yu et al., Scaling of the strange-metal scattering in unconventional superconductors , Nature 602 (2022) 431

  15. [15]

    Phillips and C

    P. Phillips and C. Chamon, Breakdown of One-Parameter Scaling in Quantum Critical Scenarios for High-Temperature Copper-Oxide Superconductors , Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 107002

  16. [16]

    Huang, S

    X. Huang, S. Sachdev and A. Lucas, Disordered Quantum Critical Fixed Points from Holography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 141601

  17. [17]

    Varma, P.B

    C.M. Varma, P.B. Littlewood, S. Schmitt-Rink, E. Abrahams and A.E. Ruckenstein, Phenomenology of the normal state of Cu-O high-temperature superconductors , Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 (1989) 1996

  18. [18]

    Valla, A.V

    T. Valla, A.V. Fedorov, P.D. Johnson, B.O. Wells, S.L. Hulbert, Q. Li et al., Evidence for Quantum Critical Behavior in the Optimally Doped Cuprate Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ, Science 285 (1999) 2110

  19. [19]

    Patel, H

    A.A. Patel, H. Guo, I. Esterlis and S. Sachdev, Universal theory of strange metals from spatially random interactions , Science 381 (2023) 790 [2203.04990]. – 36 –

  20. [20]

    Guo, A.A

    H. Guo, A.A. Patel, I. Esterlis and S. Sachdev, Large-N theory of critical Fermi surfaces. II. Conductivity , Phys. Rev. B 106 (2022) 115151

  21. [21]

    C. Li, D. Valentinis, A.A. Patel, H. Guo, J. Schmalian, S. Sachdev et al., Strange Metal and Superconductor in the Two-Dimensional Yukawa-Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model , Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 186502 [2406.07608]

  22. [22]

    Chowdhury, A

    D. Chowdhury, A. Georges, O. Parcollet and S. Sachdev, Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Models and Beyond: A Window into Non-Fermi Liquids , Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (2022) 035004 [2109.05037]

  23. [23]

    Maldacena, The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity , Int

    J.M. Maldacena, The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity , Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [hep-th/9711200]

  24. [24]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, Gauge Theory Correlators from Non-Critical String Theory , Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109]

  25. [25]

    Witten, Anti de Sitter space and holography , Adv

    E. Witten, Anti de Sitter space and holography , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

  26. [26]

    Freedman, S

    D. Freedman, S. Gubser, K. Pilch and N. Warner, Renormalization group flows from holography supersymmetry and a c theorem , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3 (1999) 363 [hep-th/9904017]

  27. [27]

    de Boer, E.P

    J. de Boer, E.P. Verlinde and H.L. Verlinde, On the holographic renormalization group , JHEP 08 (2000) 003 [hep-th/9912012]

  28. [28]

    Skenderis, Lecture notes on holographic renormalization , Class

    K. Skenderis, Lecture notes on holographic renormalization , Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 5849 [hep-th/0209067]

  29. [29]

    Heemskerk and J

    I. Heemskerk and J. Polchinski, Holographic and Wilsonian Renormalization Groups , JHEP 06 (2011) 031 [1010.1264]

  30. [30]

    Zaanen, Y

    J. Zaanen, Y. Liu, Y.-W. Sun and K. Schalm, Holographic Duality in Condensed Matter Physics, Cambridge University Press (2015), 10.1017/CBO9781139942492

  31. [31]

    Hartnoll, A

    S.A. Hartnoll, A. Lucas and S. Sachdev, Holographic Quantum Matter , The MIT press, Cambridge (2018)

  32. [32]

    Babington, J

    J. Babington, J. Erdmenger, N. Evans, Z. Guralnik and I. Kirsch, Chiral symmetry breaking and pions in nonsupersymmetric gauge/gravity duals , Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 066007

  33. [33]

    Kruczenski, D

    M. Kruczenski, D. Mateos, R.C. Myers and D.J. Winters, Towards a holographic dual of large-N c QCD, JHEP 05 (2004) 041 [hep-th/0311270]

  34. [34]

    Kim, I.J

    Y. Kim, I.J. Shin and T. Tsukioka, Holographic QCD: Past, Present, and Future , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 68 (2013) 55 [1205.4852]

  35. [35]

    Rangamani and T

    M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, Holographic Entanglement Entropy , vol. 931 of Lecture Notes in Physics , Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017), 10.1007/978-3-319-52573-0

  36. [36]

    B. Chen, B. Czech and Z.-z. Wang, Quantum information in holographic duality , Rept. Prog. Phys. 85 (2022) 046001 [2108.09188]

  37. [37]

    Kubo, Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes

    R. Kubo, Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes. I. General Theory and Simple Applications to Magnetic and Conduction Problems , J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12 (1957) 570. – 37 –

  38. [38]

    Lee, A Non-Fermi Liquid from a Charged Black Hole: A Critical Fermi Ball , Phys

    S.-S. Lee, A Non-Fermi Liquid from a Charged Black Hole: A Critical Fermi Ball , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 086006 [0809.3402]

  39. [39]

    Cubrovic, J

    M. Cubrovic, J. Zaanen and K. Schalm, String Theory, Quantum Phase Transitions and the Emergent Fermi-Liquid, Science 325 (2009) 439 [0904.1993]

  40. [40]

    H. Liu, J. McGreevy and D. Vegh, Non-Fermi liquids from holography , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 065029 [0903.2477]

  41. [41]

    Iqbal and H

    N. Iqbal and H. Liu, Real-time response in AdS/CFT with application to spinors , Fortsch. Phys. 57 (2009) 367 [0903.2596]

  42. [42]

    Faulkner, H

    T. Faulkner, H. Liu, J. McGreevy and D. Vegh, Emergent quantum criticality, Fermi surfaces, and AdS 2, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 125002 [0907.2694]

  43. [43]

    Faulkner, N

    T. Faulkner, N. Iqbal, H. Liu, J. McGreevy and D. Vegh, From Black Holes to Strange Metals, 1003.1728

  44. [44]

    Faulkner, N

    T. Faulkner, N. Iqbal, H. Liu, J. McGreevy and D. Vegh, Strange Metal Transport Realized by Gauge/Gravity Duality , Science 329 (2010) 1043

  45. [45]

    Faulkner, N

    T. Faulkner, N. Iqbal, H. Liu, J. McGreevy and D. Vegh, Holographic non-Fermi liquid fixed points, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 369 (2011) 1640 [1101.0597]

  46. [46]

    Faulkner, N

    T. Faulkner, N. Iqbal, H. Liu, J. McGreevy and D. Vegh, Charge transport by holographic Fermi surfaces, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 045016 [1306.6396]

  47. [47]

    Iqbal, H

    N. Iqbal, H. Liu and M. Mezei, Quantum phase transitions in semilocal quantum liquids , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 025024 [1108.0425]

  48. [48]

    Gubser and F.D

    S.S. Gubser and F.D. Rocha, Peculiar properties of a charged dilatonic black hole in AdS 5, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 046001 [0911.2898]

  49. [49]

    Goutéraux, Charge transport in holography with momentum dissipation , JHEP 04 (2014) 181 [1401.5436]

    B. Goutéraux, Charge transport in holography with momentum dissipation , JHEP 04 (2014) 181 [1401.5436]

  50. [50]

    F. Balm, N. Chagnet, S. Arend, J. Aretz, K. Grosvenor, M. Janse et al., T -linear resistivity, optical conductivity, and Planckian transport for a holographic local quantum critical metal in a periodic potential , Phys. Rev. B 108 (2023) 125145

  51. [51]

    Davison, K

    R.A. Davison, K. Schalm and J. Zaanen, Holographic duality and the resistivity of strange metals, Phys. Rev. B 89 (2014) 245116 [1311.2451]

  52. [52]

    Jeong, K.-Y

    H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim and C. Niu, Linear-T resistivity at high temperature , JHEP 10 (2018) 191 [1806.07739]

  53. [53]

    Ahn, H.-S

    Y. Ahn, H.-S. Jeong, D. Ahn and K.-Y. Kim, Linear-T resistivity from low to high temperature: Axion-dilaton theories , JHEP 04 (2020) 153 [1907.12168]

  54. [54]

    Blake and A

    M. Blake and A. Donos, Quantum Critical Transport and the Hall Angle , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 021601 [1406.1659]

  55. [55]

    Lucas and S

    A. Lucas and S. Sachdev, Memory matrix theory of magnetotransport in strange metals , Phys. Rev. B 91 (2015) 195122 [1502.04704]

  56. [56]

    Y. Ahn, M. Baggioli, H.-S. Jeong and K.-Y. Kim, Inability of linear axion holographic Gubser-Rocha model to capture all the transport anomalies of strange metals , Phys. Rev. B 108 (2023) 235104 [2307.04433]. – 38 –

  57. [57]

    Pal, Model building in AdS/CMT: DC Conductivity and Hall angle , Phys

    S.S. Pal, Model building in AdS/CMT: DC Conductivity and Hall angle , Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 126009 [1011.3117]

  58. [58]

    B.S. Kim, E. Kiritsis and C. Panagopoulos, Holographic quantum criticality and strange metal transport, New J. Phys. 14 (2012) 043045 [1012.3464]

  59. [59]

    Fadafan, Strange metals at finite ’t Hooft coupling , Eur

    K.B. Fadafan, Strange metals at finite ’t Hooft coupling , Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2281 [1208.1855]

  60. [60]

    Zhou, J.-P

    Z. Zhou, J.-P. Wu and Y. Ling, DC and Hall conductivity in holographic massive Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton gravity , JHEP 08 (2015) 067 [1504.00535]

  61. [61]

    X.-H. Ge, Y. Tian, S.-Y. Wu and S.-F. Wu, Linear and quadratic in temperature resistivity from holography, JHEP 11 (2016) 128 [1606.07905]

  62. [62]

    Blauvelt, S

    E. Blauvelt, S. Cremonini, A. Hoover, L. Li and S. Waskie, Holographic model for the anomalous scalings of the cuprates , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 061901 [1710.01326]

  63. [63]

    Cremonini, A

    S. Cremonini, A. Hoover, L. Li and S. Waskie, Anomalous scalings of cuprate strange metals from nonlinear electrodynamics , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 061901 [1812.01040]

  64. [64]

    den Eede, T

    S.V. den Eede, T. van Stralen, C. Flipse and H. Stoof, Plasmons in a layered strange metal using the gauge-gravity duality , Phys. Rev. B 109 (2024) 085119 [2311.03142]

  65. [65]

    Faulkner and J

    T. Faulkner and J. Polchinski, Semi-Holographic Fermi Liquids , JHEP 06 (2011) 012 [1001.5049]

  66. [66]

    Faulkner, H

    T. Faulkner, H. Liu and M. Rangamani, Integrating out geometry: Holographic Wilsonian RG and the membrane paradigm , JHEP 08 (2011) 051 [1010.4036]

  67. [67]

    Mukhopadhyay and G

    A. Mukhopadhyay and G. Policastro, Phenomenological characterisation of semi-holographic non-Fermi liquids , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 221602 [1306.3941]

  68. [68]

    Gursoy, E

    U. Gursoy, E. Plauschinn, H. Stoof and S. Vandoren, Holography and ARPES sum-rules , JHEP 05 (2012) 018 [1112.5074]

  69. [69]

    Douçot, A

    B. Douçot, A. Mukhopadhyay, G. Policastro and S. Samanta, Linear-in-T resistivity from semiholographic non-Fermi liquid models , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) L081901 [2012.15679]

  70. [70]

    Samanta, H

    S. Samanta, H. Swain, B. Douçot, G. Policastro and A. Mukhopadhyay, A simple model for strange metallic behavior , 2206.01215

  71. [71]

    Doucot, A

    B. Doucot, A. Mukhopadhyay, G. Policastro, S. Samanta and H. Swain, An effective framework for strange metallic transport , JHEP 12 (2024) 118 [2409.02993]

  72. [72]

    S. Smit, E. Mauri, L. Bawden, F. Heringa, F. Gerritsen, E. van Heumen et al., Momentum-dependent scaling exponents of nodal self-energies measured in strange metal cuprates and modelled using semi-holography , Nat. Commun. 15 (2024) 4581 [2112.06576]

  73. [73]

    Reber, X

    T.J. Reber, X. Zhou, N.C. Plumb, S. Parham, J.A. Waugh, Y. Cao et al., A unified form of low-energy nodal electronic interactions in hole-doped cuprate superconductors , Nat. Commun. 10 (2019) 5737

  74. [74]

    Mauri, S

    E. Mauri, S. Smit, M.S. Golden and H.T.C. Stoof, Gauge-gravity duality comes to the laboratory: Evidence of momentum-dependent scaling exponents in the nodal electron self-energy of cuprate strange metals , Phys. Rev. B 109 (2024) 155140 [2402.10844]

  75. [75]

    D. Harlow, TASI Lectures on the Emergence of Bulk Physics in AdS/CFT , in Proceedings of Theoretical Advanced Study Institute Summer School 2017 ”Physics at the Fundamental – 39 – Frontier” — PoS(TASI2017) , (Boulder, Colorado), p. 002, Sissa Medialab, Aug., 2018, 10.22323/1.305.0002

  76. [76]

    De Jonckheere, Modave lectures on bulk reconstruction in AdS/CFT , in Proceedings of XIII Modave Summer School in Mathematical Physics — PoS(Modave2017) , (Modave, Belgium), p

    T. De Jonckheere, Modave lectures on bulk reconstruction in AdS/CFT , in Proceedings of XIII Modave Summer School in Mathematical Physics — PoS(Modave2017) , (Modave, Belgium), p. 005, Sissa Medialab, Mar., 2018, 10.22323/1.323.0005

  77. [77]

    Hamilton, D

    A. Hamilton, D. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe, Local bulk operators in AdS/CFT: A boundary view of horizons and locality , Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 086003 [hep-th/0506118]

  78. [78]

    Hamilton, D

    A. Hamilton, D. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe, Holographic representation of local bulk operators, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 066009 [hep-th/0606141]

  79. [79]

    Balasubramanian and S.F

    V. Balasubramanian and S.F. Ross, Holographic Particle Detection , Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 044007 [hep-th/9906226]

  80. [80]

    Hubeny, Extremal surfaces as bulk probes in AdS/CFT , JHEP 07 (2012) 093 [1203.1044]

    V.E. Hubeny, Extremal surfaces as bulk probes in AdS/CFT , JHEP 07 (2012) 093 [1203.1044]

Showing first 80 references.