Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 47 references

Adapted Law Invariance and Time-Consistent Dynamic Risk Measures

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Time-consistent dynamic risk measures that respect adapted law invariance are exactly nested one-step conditional lifts of ordinary static law-invariant risk measures.

desk verdict Clean axiomatic characterization: adapted law invariance plus time consistency equals recursive conditional lifts of static law-invariant risk measures, with a nested Kusuoka form and a self-contained two-period KS rigidity proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.04392 v1 pith:UKQWD4TZ submitted 2026-07-05 q-fin.RM math.PR

Mathias Beiglböck , Silvana M. Pesenti , Maxime Sylvestre This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-fin.RMmath.PR MSC 91G7060G0791B30
keywords dynamicriskmeasuresadaptedlawinvariancetimeconsistencyconditionalKusuokarepresentationAverageValue-at-Risk
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

In static risk measurement, law invariance says that only the distribution of a position should matter, not the sample space used to represent it. Dynamically, information arrives over time, so two positions with the same terminal law can still differ if one is resolved early and the other late. Adapted law invariance keeps both the distribution and the timing of resolution as the relevant object. The paper proves that, under Fatou regularity, a relevant time-consistent dynamic risk measure is adapted-law invariant if and only if each one-step evaluation depends only on the conditional law of the next-period position given present information, and is itself the conditional lift of a static law-invariant risk measure. The whole dynamic measure is then the backward composition of these one-step maps. Convexity and coherence of the dynamic object are equivalent to the same properties of the static one-step maps. This makes adapted law invariance the natural dynamic counterpart of ordinary law invariance, while showing that the stronger terminal-law invariance used in classical rigidity results erases the very timing information that filtrations are meant to capture.

What carries the argument

Adapted law invariance of the initial functional R0, together with reconstruction from R0 and one-step identification via filtration-preserving automorphisms and conditional resampling on the standard filtered cube, which force each St to factor through the conditional law L(·|Ft).

What would settle it

Exhibit a relevant time-consistent Fatou dynamic risk measure that is adapted-law invariant yet whose one-step map at some date fails to depend only on the conditional law of the next-period position, or construct two positions with identical adapted laws that receive different R0 values under such a measure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under Fatou regularity, a relevant time-consistent dynamic risk measure on a rich filtered space is adapted-law invariant if and only if each one-step map is the conditional lift of a unique relevant static law-invariant Fatou risk measure: St(Y) equals ρt of the conditional law of Y given Ft. The full family is recovered by backward composition of these maps, and dynamic convexity or coherence holds exactly when the static one-step maps have those properties.

Load-bearing premise

The filtered probability space must be rich enough at every date that any conditional law of the next-period position can be realized, so that one-step maps can be identified solely from conditional laws.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper characterizes adapted-law-invariant time-consistent dynamic risk measures on the standard filtered cube. Under relevance and Fatou regularity of R0, adapted law invariance of a time-consistent family R is equivalent to a recursive one-step representation: each St is the conditional lift of a unique relevant static law-invariant Fatou risk measure ρt, so that Rt is the backward composition of these maps (Theorem 2.12). Convexity and coherence of R are equivalent to the corresponding properties of the ρt. The paper also gives a self-contained two-period proof of the Kupper–Schachermayer rigidity theorem under terminal-law invariance (Theorem 2.15 / Section 4) and, in the coherent case, an adapted nested Kusuoka representation (Corollary 2.16).

Significance. The main equivalence cleanly isolates adapted law invariance as the natural dynamic counterpart of ordinary law invariance, while clarifying why terminal-law invariance is rigid: it erases the timing of information revelation. The proofs are self-contained and use standard tools (reconstruction from R0, adapted automorphisms, ergodicity, Kolmogorov–Nagumo–de Finetti plus cash additivity). The finite-horizon KS argument already implies the classical infinite-horizon statement, and the nested conditional Kusuoka form is the correct dynamic analogue of the static theorem. These are solid, publishable contributions to the axiomatic theory of dynamic risk measures.

minor comments (4)
  1. Remark 2.13 already notes that the standard filtered cube is used only for conditional atomlessness. A short sentence in the introduction or after Theorem 2.12 stating that the same conclusions hold on any filtered space that is conditionally atomless over each Ft would make the scope fully transparent.
  2. In the proof of Lemma 3.8 the three-step approximation (finitely valued o finite deterministic support o general bounded) is clear, but a one-line reminder that continuity from below (Lemma 3.3) is applied both to St and to the lift of ρt would help the reader track the limits.
  3. Section 4 invokes the Kolmogorov–Nagumo–de Finetti theorem for finite lotteries; a brief pointer to the precise hypotheses used (internal, strictly increasing, mixture-continuous) would make the deterministic classification fully self-contained for readers outside decision theory.
  4. A few typographical slips appear (e.g., spacing around “Adapted Law Invariance” in running heads, occasional missing spaces after commas in the references). These are purely cosmetic.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main characterization is a genuine equivalence proved from the stated axioms, and the KS rigidity is re-derived from first principles rather than imported as a black box.

full rationale

The paper's central claim (Theorem 2.12) is an if-and-only-if characterization: under relevance, time consistency and Fatou regularity of R0 on the standard filtered cube, adapted-law invariance of R0 is equivalent to the one-step maps being conditional lifts of unique static law-invariant Fatou risk measures. The proof reconstructs the family from R0 (Lemma 2.7), propagates Fatou (Lemma 3.2), uses adapted automorphisms and ergodicity (Lemmas 3.5–3.6) plus current-kernel invariance (Lemma 3.7) to identify St(Y)=ρt(L(Y|Ft)) (Lemma 3.8), and recovers adapted-law invariance of the backward composition via the Borel maps rt of iterated conditional laws. None of these steps defines the conclusion into the hypothesis. The two-period Kupper–Schachermayer rigidity (Section 4) is likewise self-contained: terminal-law invariance plus time consistency yields decomposability of the initial law functional (Lemmas 4.1–4.2), which is then classified by the classical Kolmogorov–Nagumo–de Finetti theorem plus cash-additivity (Lemmas 4.4–4.6) without relying on the original infinite-horizon argument of [35] as a load-bearing black box. The adapted Kusuoka representation (Corollary 2.16) simply composes the main characterization with the classical static Kusuoka theorem. There are no fitted parameters, no self-definitional loops, and no uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' own prior work that force the result. The only structural limitation is the classical richness assumption (standard filtered cube / conditional atomlessness), which is explicitly flagged and is the dynamic counterpart of atomlessness for static law-invariance; it does not create circularity. Score 0 is therefore the correct assessment.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper works entirely inside standard discrete-time risk-measure theory on a rich filtered probability space. No numerical free parameters are fitted. The only non-standard modeling choice is the richness of the filtration (standard cube / conditional atomlessness), which is used as a technical hypothesis rather than an invented physical entity.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Dynamic risk measures are monotone, cash-additive, normalized, and satisfy the terminal condition RN(X)=X (Definition 2.3).
    Standard axiomatic starting point of the monetary-risk-measure literature.
  • domain assumption Time consistency is the recursive relation Rt(X)=Rt(Rt+1(X)) (Definition 2.4).
    Classical discrete-time time-consistency axiom used throughout the paper.
  • domain assumption Relevance of R0: R0(ε1A)>0 whenever P(A)>0 (Definition 2.4).
    Used for uniqueness of reconstruction from R0 (Lemma 2.7) and for relevance of the one-step maps.
  • domain assumption Fatou property of R0 (lower semicontinuity under a.s. bounded convergence).
    Assumed in Theorem 2.12; propagates to one-step maps (Lemma 3.2) and guarantees Borel measurability of the static ρt.
  • domain assumption Underlying space is the standard filtered cube (or at least conditionally atomless over each Ft).
    Richness hypothesis (Remark 2.13) needed to realize arbitrary conditional laws and to apply adapted automorphisms.
  • standard math Adapted law is the iterated conditional law Lad(X) (Definition 2.9 / equation (1)).
    Taken from the adapted-transport / Hoover–Keisler literature; used as the invariance notion.
  • standard math Classical static Kusuoka representation for coherent law-invariant Fatou risk measures (Theorem 5.1).
    Invoked only for the coherent corollary; not needed for the main characterization.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Adapted Law Invariance and Time-Consistent Dynamic Risk Measures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UKQWD4TZ

@misc{pith2026260704392,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Adapted Law Invariance and Time-Consistent Dynamic Risk Measures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UKQWD4TZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.04392}
}
read the original abstract

In static risk measurement, law invariance expresses the principle that the risk of a position should depend only on its distribution, and not on the particular probability space on which it is represented. In a dynamic setting, the same principle leads naturally to adapted law invariance: the risk assessment should depend only on the probabilistic structure of the financial position together with the way information about it is revealed over time. We show that, for time-consistent risk measures, adapted law invariance is equivalent to a recursive one-step conditional-law representation. More precisely, assuming Fatou regularity, the one-step risk evaluations are exactly conditional lifts of static law-invariant risk measures, and the full dynamic risk measure is obtained by backward composition of these one-step maps. Convexity and coherence of the dynamic risk measure are characterized by the corresponding properties of the static one-step risk measures. This identifies adapted law invariance as the dynamic counterpart of ordinary law invariance. It also clarifies the strength of terminal-law invariance, as it appears in the rigidity theorem of Kupper and Schachermayer: it does not distinguish risks with the same distribution but different times of resolution. We further obtain an adapted Kusuoka representation in the coherent case and establish an extension of the Kupper--Schachermayer theorem.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dynamic Risk Measures

    B. Acciaio and I. Penner. “Dynamic Risk Measures”. In:Advanced Mathematical Methods for Finance. Berlin: Springer, 2011, pp. 1–34

    2011

  2. [2]

    Risk Assessment for Uncertain Cash Flows: Model Ambiguity, Discounting Ambiguity, and the Role of Bubbles

    Beatrice Acciaio, Hans Föllmer, and Irina Penner. “Risk Assessment for Uncertain Cash Flows: Model Ambiguity, Discounting Ambiguity, and the Role of Bubbles”. In:Finance and Stochastics16.4 (2012), pp. 669–709.doi:10.1007/s00780-012-0176-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00780-012-0176-1 2012

  3. [3]

    Expected Shortfall: A Natural Coherent Alternative to Value at Risk

    Carlo Acerbi and Dirk Tasche. “Expected Shortfall: A Natural Coherent Alternative to Value at Risk”. In:Economic Notes31.2 (2002), pp. 379–388.doi:10.1111/1468-0300. 00091

    work page doi:10.1111/1468-0300 2002

  4. [4]

    New York: Aca- demic Press, 1966

    János Aczél.Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications. New York: Aca- demic Press, 1966

    1966

  5. [5]

    Coherent measures of risk

    P. Artzner et al. “Coherent measures of risk”. In:Mathematical Finance9 (1999), pp. 203– 228

    1999

  6. [6]

    Coherent multiperiod risk adjusted values and Bellman’s principle

    Philippe Artzner et al. “Coherent multiperiod risk adjusted values and Bellman’s principle”. In:Annals of Operations Research152.1 (2007), pp. 5–22

    2007

  7. [7]

    The Wasserstein space of sto- chastic processes

    Daniel Bartl, Mathias Beiglböck, and Gudmund Pammer. “The Wasserstein space of sto- chastic processes”. In:J. Eur. Math. Soc.(2024). To appear. arXiv:2104.14245. eprint: arXiv:2312.16725. REFERENCES 21

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Beiglböck, S

    M. Beiglböck, S. Pflügl, and S. Schrott.A Probabilistic View on the Adapted Wasserstein Distance. Preprint. 2024. arXiv:2406.19810

    arXiv 2024

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    ABrenierTheoremon(P 2(P2(Rd)), W2) and Applications to Adapted Transport

    MathiasBeiglböck,GudmundPammer,andStefanSchrott.“ABrenierTheoremon(P 2(P2(Rd)), W2) and Applications to Adapted Transport”. In:ArXiv e-prints(2025). arXiv:2509.03506 [math.PR].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.03506

    2025

  2. [10]

    Preprint

    Zakaria Bensaid et al.Law-Invariant BSDEs and Dynamic Risk Measures: New Char- acterizations. Preprint. 2026.doi:10 . 48550 / arXiv . 2604 . 11382. arXiv:2604 . 11382 [math.OC]

    2026

  3. [11]

    A Survey of Time Consistency of Dynamic Risk Measures and Dynamic Performance Measures in Discrete Time: LM- Measure Perspective

    Tomasz R. Bielecki, Igor Cialenco, and Marcin Pitera. “A Survey of Time Consistency of Dynamic Risk Measures and Dynamic Performance Measures in Discrete Time: LM- Measure Perspective”. In:Probability, Uncertainty and Quantitative Risk2.3 (2017), pp. 1– 52.doi:10.1186/s41546-0...

    2017 doi

  4. [12]

    A Unified Approach to Time Con- sistency of Dynamic Risk Measures and Dynamic Performance Measures in Discrete Time

    Tomasz R. Bielecki, Igor Cialenco, and Marcin Pitera. “A Unified Approach to Time Con- sistency of Dynamic Risk Measures and Dynamic Performance Measures in Discrete Time”. In:Mathematics of Operations Research43.1 (2018), pp. 204–221.doi:10.1287/moor. 2017.0858

    2018 doi

  5. [13]

    Dynamic Risk Measures: Time Consistency and Risk Measures from BMO Martingales

    Jocelyne Bion-Nadal. “Dynamic Risk Measures: Time Consistency and Risk Measures from BMO Martingales”. In:Finance and Stochastics12.2 (2008), pp. 219–244.doi:10.1007/ s00780-007-0057-1

    2008

  6. [14]

    Dynamic Monetary Risk Mea- suresforBoundedDiscrete-TimeProcesses

    Patrick Cheridito, Freddy Delbaen, and Michael Kupper. “Dynamic Monetary Risk Mea- suresforBoundedDiscrete-TimeProcesses”.In:Electronic Journal of Probability11(2006), pp. 57–106.doi:10.1214/EJP.v11-302

    2006 doi

  7. [15]

    Composition of Time-Consistent Dynamic Mone- tary Risk Measures in Discrete Time

    Patrick Cheridito and Michael Kupper. “Composition of Time-Consistent Dynamic Mone- tary Risk Measures in Discrete Time”. In:International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance14.1 (2011), pp. 137–162.doi:10.1142/S0219024911006292

    2011 doi

  8. [16]

    Dual Characterization of Properties of Risk Measures on Orlicz Hearts

    Patrick Cheridito and Tianhui Li. “Dual Characterization of Properties of Risk Measures on Orlicz Hearts”. In:Mathematics and Financial Economics2.1 (2008), pp. 29–55.doi: 10.1007/s11579-008-0013-7

    2008 doi

  9. [17]

    Time-inconsistency of VaR and time-consistent alter- natives

    Patrick Cheridito and Mitja Stadje. “Time-inconsistency of VaR and time-consistent alter- natives”. In:Finance Research Letters6.1 (2009), pp. 40–46

    2009

  10. [18]

    Robust reinforcement learning with dynamic distortion risk measures

    Anthony Coache and Sebastian Jaimungal. “Robust reinforcement learning with dynamic distortion risk measures”. In:SIAM Journal on Mathematics of Data Science8.1 (2026), pp. 1–22

    2026

  11. [19]

    The structure of m–stable sets and in particular of the set of risk neu- tral measures

    Freddy Delbaen. “The structure of m–stable sets and in particular of the set of risk neu- tral measures”. In:In memoriam Paul-André Meyer: Séminaire de Probabilités XXXIX. Springer, 2006, pp. 215–258

    2006

  12. [20]

    RepresentationofthePenalty Term of Dynamic Concave Utilities

    FreddyDelbaen,ShigePeng,andEmanuelaRosazzaGianin.“RepresentationofthePenalty Term of Dynamic Concave Utilities”. In:Finance and Stochastics14.3 (2010), pp. 449–472. doi:10.1007/s00780-009-0119-7

    2010 doi

  13. [21]

    Dynamic Risk Optimization

    Darinka Dentcheva and Andrzej Ruszczyński. “Dynamic Risk Optimization”. In:Risk- Averse Optimization and Control: Theory and Methods. Springer Series in Operations Re- search and Financial Engineering. Cham: Springer, 2024, pp. 175–229.doi:10.1007/978- 3-031-57988-2_4

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    Conditional and Dynamic Convex Risk Measures

    Kai Detlefsen and Giacomo Scandolo. “Conditional and Dynamic Convex Risk Measures”. In:Finance and Stochastics9.4 (2005), pp. 539–561.doi:10.1007/s00780-005-0159-6

    2005 doi

  15. [23]

    Backward stochastic difference equations for dynamic convex risk measures on a binomial tree

    Robert J Elliott, Tak Kuen Siu, and Samuel N Cohen. “Backward stochastic difference equations for dynamic convex risk measures on a binomial tree”. In:Journal of Applied probability52.3 (2015), pp. 771–785. 22 REFERENCES

    2015

  16. [24]

    Sul concetto di media

    Bruno de Finetti. “Sul concetto di media”. In:Giornale dell’Istituto Italiano degli Attuari 2 (1931), pp. 369–396

    1931

  17. [25]

    Convex measures of risk and trading constraints

    H. Föllmer and A. Schied. “Convex measures of risk and trading constraints”. In:Finance and Stochastics6 (2002), pp. 429–447

    2002

  18. [26]

    Spatial risk measures and their local specification: The locally law-invariant case

    Hans Föllmer. “Spatial risk measures and their local specification: The locally law-invariant case”. In:Statistics & Risk Modeling31.1 (2014), pp. 79–101.doi:10.1515/strm-2013- 5001

    2014 doi

  19. [27]

    Convex Risk Measures and the Dynamics of Their Penalty Functions

    Hans Föllmer and Irina Penner. “Convex Risk Measures and the Dynamics of Their Penalty Functions”. In:Statistics & Decisions24.1 (2006), pp. 61–96.doi:10.1524/stnd.2006. 24.1.61

    2006 doi

  20. [28]

    Hans Föllmer and Alexander Schied.Stochastic Finance: An Introduction in Discrete Time. 2nd ed. Vol. 27. de Gruyter Studies in Mathematics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2004.doi: 10.1515/9783110212075

    2004 doi

  21. [29]

    Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2025

    Hans Föllmer and Alexander Schied.Stochastic finance: an introduction in discrete time. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2025

    2025

  22. [30]

    Putting order in risk measures

    M. Frittelli and E. Rosazza Gianin. “Putting order in risk measures”. In:Journal of Banking & Finance26 (2002), pp. 1473–1486

    2002

  23. [31]

    Law-Invariant Convex Risk Measures

    Marco Frittelli and Emanuela Rosazza Gianin. “Law-Invariant Convex Risk Measures”. In:Advances in Mathematical Economics. Vol. 7. Tokyo: Springer, 2005, pp. 33–46.doi: 10.1007/4-431-27233-X_2

    2005 doi

  24. [32]

    Adapted probability distributions

    Douglas N Hoover and H Jerome Keisler. “Adapted probability distributions”. In:Trans- actions of the American Mathematical Society286.1 (1984), pp. 159–201

    1984

  25. [33]

    Law Invariant Risk Measures Have the Fatou Property

    Elyès Jouini, Walter Schachermayer, and Nizar Touzi. “Law Invariant Risk Measures Have the Fatou Property”. In:Advances in Mathematical Economics. Vol. 9. Tokyo: Springer, 2006, pp. 49–71.doi:10.1007/4-431-34342-3_4

    2006 doi

  26. [34]

    Sur la notion de la moyenne

    Andrey N. Kolmogorov. “Sur la notion de la moyenne”. In:Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei12 (1930), pp. 388–391

    1930

  27. [35]

    Representation Results for Law Invariant Time Con- sistent Functions

    M. Kupper and W. Schachermayer. “Representation Results for Law Invariant Time Con- sistent Functions”. In:Mathematics and Financial Economics2.3 (2009), pp. 189–210

    2009

  28. [36]

    On Law-Invariant Coherent Risk Measures

    Shigeo Kusuoka. “On Law-Invariant Coherent Risk Measures”. In:Advances in Mathemati- cal Economics. Vol. 3. Tokyo: Springer, 2001, pp. 83–95.doi:10.1007/978-4-431-67891- 5_4

    2001 doi

  29. [37]

    Uncertainty Propagation and Dynamic Robust Risk Measures

    Marlon R. Moresco, Mélina Mailhot, and Silvana M. Pesenti. “Uncertainty Propagation and Dynamic Robust Risk Measures”. In:Mathematics of Operations Research50.3 (2025). Published online 2024, pp. 1939–1964.doi:10.1287/moor.2023.0267

    2025 doi

  30. [38]

    Über eine Klasse der Mittelwerte

    Mitio Nagumo. “Über eine Klasse der Mittelwerte”. In:Japanese Journal of Mathematics 7 (1930), pp. 71–79

    1930

  31. [39]

    Risk Budgeting Allocation for Dynamic Risk Measures

    Silvana M. Pesenti et al. “Risk Budgeting Allocation for Dynamic Risk Measures”. In: Operations Research73.3 (2025), pp. 1208–1229.doi:10.1287/opre.2023.0299

    2025 doi

  32. [40]

    Version-independence and nested distributions in multistage stochastic op- timization

    G. Ch. Pflug. “Version-independence and nested distributions in multistage stochastic op- timization”. In:SIAM Journal on Optimization20.3 (2009), pp. 1406–1420

    2009

  33. [41]

    Dynamic Coherent Risk Measures

    Frank Riedel. “Dynamic Coherent Risk Measures”. In:Stochastic Processes and their Ap- plications112.2 (2004), pp. 185–200.doi:10.1016/j.spa.2004.03.004

    2004 doi

  34. [42]

    Conditional Value-at-Risk for General Loss Distributions

    R. Tyrrell Rockafellar and Stanislav Uryasev. “Conditional Value-at-Risk for General Loss Distributions”. In:Journal of Banking & Finance26.7 (2002), pp. 1443–1471.doi:10 . 1016/S0378-4266(02)00271-6

    2002

  35. [43]

    Risk-averse dynamic programming for Markov decision processes

    Andrzej Ruszczyński. “Risk-averse dynamic programming for Markov decision processes”. In:Mathematical Programming125.2 (2010), pp. 235–261. REFERENCES 23

    2010

  36. [44]

    Conditional Risk Mappings

    Andrzej Ruszczyński and Alexander Shapiro. “Conditional Risk Mappings”. In:Mathemat- ics of Operations Research31.3 (2006), pp. 544–561.doi:10.1287/moor.1060.0204

    2006 doi

  37. [45]

    On Kusuoka Representation of Law Invariant Risk Measures

    Alexander Shapiro. “On Kusuoka Representation of Law Invariant Risk Measures”. In: Mathematics of Operations Research38.1 (2013), pp. 142–152.doi:10.1287/moor.1120. 0563

    2013 doi

  38. [46]

    Dynamic Pareto Optima in Multi- Period Pure-Exchange Economies

    Brandon Tam, Mario Ghossoub, and Silvana M Pesenti. “Dynamic Pareto Optima in Multi- Period Pure-Exchange Economies”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.19414(2026)

    2026

  39. [47]

    Distribution-Invariant Risk Measures, Information, and Dynamic Consistency

    S. Weber. “Distribution-Invariant Risk Measures, Information, and Dynamic Consistency”. In:Mathematical Finance16.2 (2006), pp. 419–441

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.