The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2607.05258 · v1 · pith:VI3UGTK7 · submitted 2026-07-06 · hep-th

Thermal two-point functions in SYK and complex-time singularities

Ilija Buri\'c , Chi-Ming Chang , Ivan Gusev , Elizabeth Helfenberger , Andrei Parnachev , Mukund Rangamani This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel 2026-07-07 21:06 UTCglm-5.2pith:VI3UGTK7record.jsonopen to challenge →

classification hep-th
keywords singularitiestemperaturecomplex-timeeffectiveemergentgeometryliessingularity
0
0 comments X

The pith

SYK correlator singularities mapped across complex time plane

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes that the large-N Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) thermal two-point function possesses an infinite tower of singularities in the complex time plane, and tracks the leading few as temperature is varied from infinity to zero. The leading singularity sits on the imaginary axis at τ = iτ* with τ* ≈ 2.8/J, defining an effective temperature that controls the short-time dynamics of operator growth and guarantees analyticity in a wider strip than thermal KMS invariance alone requires. The next-to-leading singularity lies off the imaginary axis, outside the effective thermal strip, and is qualitatively reminiscent of the imprint that bouncing null geodesics leave on holographic black hole correlators. Both singularities persist to zero temperature, suggesting they are intrinsic to the model rather than thermal artifacts. The authors provide an analytic argument fixing the local structure of the leading singularity as G(τ) ~ (2q/(q-2)^2)^{1/(q-2)} · 1/(τ+τ*)^{2/(q-2)}, with the residue verified numerically for q=4 (where it equals √2). The argument proceeds by assuming a WKB form for the high-frequency spectral density ρ(ω) ~ A ω^α e^{-τ* ω} and showing that the Schwinger-Dyson self-consistency equations fix both the power α and the amplitude A, thereby determining the singularity's local structure without predicting τ* itself, which remains extracted numerically. Two complementary methods — a perturbative double expansion in βJ and τ/β around the free UV point, and a direct numerical solution of the Schwinger-Dyson equations — are shown to agree well in their overlapping regime of validity.

Core claim

The paper's central result is the demonstration, via two independent computational methods, that the SYK two-point function has an infinite tower of complex-time singularities whose leading members survive to zero temperature, combined with an analytic derivation that the leading singularity's local structure is a power-law branch point G(τ) ~ (2q/(q-2)^2)^{1/(q-2)} · (τ+τ*)^{-2/(q-2)} whose residue is fixed by Schwinger-Dyson self-consistency alone. The leading singularity at τ* ≈ 2.8/J defines an effective temperature controlling operator growth dynamics, while the subleading off-axis singularity is qualitatively identified with the bouncing null geodesic signature seen in holographicblack

What carries the argument

The argument runs through three main components: (1) the Schwinger-Dyson equations G^{-1}(ω) = -iω - Σ(ω), Σ(τ) = J^2 G^{q-1}(τ), which at large N form a closed system for the two-point function; (2) a double-expansion scheme treating G as a function of τ/β and βJ, with Padé resummation extending beyond the convergence disk |β| < 2 set by Fermi-Dirac singularities; and (3) a WKB self-consistency argument for the spectral density ρ(ω) ~ A ω^α e^{-τ* ω}, where the convolution structure of the self-energy spectral density ρ_Σ(ω) = ∫ ∏ ρ(ω_a) δ(ω - Σω_a) forces the power and amplitude to satisfy α = -(q-4)/(q-2) and A = [2π Γ(2+2/(q-2))^{1/(q-2)} Γ(2/(q-2))^{1/(2-q)}], fixing the singularity's

If this is right

  • The persistence of singularities to zero temperature means the effective temperature τ* is a property of the vacuum theory, not a thermal artifact, constraining any putative holographic dual geometry even at T=0.
  • The analytic formula for the singularity structure is valid for arbitrary q, making it testable in other melonic large-N models (supersymmetric SYK, tensor models) that share the same Schwinger-Dyson architecture.
  • The double-expansion method with Padé resummation provides a new route to extract low-temperature thermodynamic coefficients, as demonstrated by the energy expansion coefficients matching prior numerical work.
  • The identification of a UV cap scale z_cap ~ t*/2 ≈ 1.4/J in the kinematic space interpretation suggests a concrete microscopic cutoff for the AdS2 throat, potentially bridging sub-AdS and supra-AdS regimes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the subleading singularity genuinely corresponds to a bouncing null geodesic, its position in the complex time plane should be computable from the effective geometry of the kinematic space throat, providing a field-theory-side prediction for a geometric quantity — but the paper only establishes the qualitative analogy, not a quantitative derivation.
  • The WKB self-consistency argument could potentially be extended to subleading exponentials in the spectral density (terms like e^{-τ_c ω} with complex τ_c), which would predict the local structure of the subleading singularity analytically rather than just numerically.
  • The fact that τ* varies mildly with temperature and saturates at zero temperature suggests the effective temperature is controlled by UV physics rather than the IR conformal fixed point, which would mean the conformal approximation is insufficient for predicting τ* — a point the paper notes but does not fully develop.

Load-bearing premise

The analytic argument for the leading singularity's structure assumes a WKB ansatz for the high-frequency spectral density (ρ(ω) ~ A ω^α e^{-τ* ω}) without deriving it from first principles, and the numerical value τ* ≈ 2.8/J is extracted from computation rather than predicted analytically. The interpretation of the subleading singularity as a bouncing geodesic imprint is qualitative, supported by analogy with holographic examples rather than by direct derivation from the SYK

What would settle it

The analytic prediction for the leading singularity's residue (specifically √2 for q=4) could be falsified by higher-precision numerical solutions of the Schwinger-Dyson equations showing a systematic deviation. Additionally, if the WKB self-consistency argument were found to be inconsistent at some order — for instance, if subleading corrections to the spectral density do not produce the expected logarithmic terms near the singularity — the claimed local structure would need revision.

read the original abstract

We analyze the finite-temperature two-point function of the large-$N$ SYK model at intermediate couplings away from the infrared fixed point. Specifically, we examine its analytic structure in the complex time plane, tracking the complex-time singularities over a range of temperatures. The location of the leading singularity lies on the imaginary axis. It controls the short-time dynamics of operator complexity, defining an `effective temperature' for the correlator. The next-to-leading singularity lies outside the thermal strip set by the above effective temperature. It has been argued that this could be interpreted in terms of bouncing null geodesics in the emergent black hole geometry. Both these singularities persist all the way down to zero temperature. We discuss our observations and motivate the related emergent geometry using a kinematic space perspective.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies the finite-temperature two-point function of the large-N SYK model, focusing on its analytic structure in the complex time plane. The authors employ two complementary methods — a perturbative double expansion in (τ/β, βJ) resummed via Padé approximants, and a direct numerical solution of the Schwinger-Dyson equations analyzed via the AAA rational approximation algorithm — to identify singularities of the correlator. The leading singularity is found on the imaginary axis at τ = iτ* (τ* ≈ 2.8/J), and its local structure is derived analytically via a WKB self-consistency argument. A subleading off-axis singularity is also identified and interpreted in terms of bouncing null geodesics. Both singularities are tracked as a function of temperature and appear to persist to T = 0.

Significance. The paper makes a genuine contribution in providing an analytic derivation of the leading singularity's power-law and residue (Eqs. 3.10–3.11) from the Schwinger-Dyson equations, with the large-q limit (Eq. 3.14) and q=4 numerical verification (Fig. 7, residue ≈ √2) serving as non-trivial checks. The double-expansion method and its Padé resummation are technically sound, and the cross-check with the numerical SD solution (Figs. 2–4) in the overlapping regime is convincing. The energy expansion coefficients (Table 1) provide an independent validation of the methodology. The study of complex-time singularities in SYK at finite temperature, away from both the conformal IR and infinite-temperature limits, fills a genuine gap in the literature.

major comments (3)
  1. §3.2, §3.3, Fig. 4: The identification of the subleading (off-axis) singularity relies entirely on two rational approximation methods — Padé approximants of the double expansion and the AAA algorithm applied to numerical real-axis data. As acknowledged after Eq. (3.16), the exact correlator has branch points with logarithmic structure, not isolated poles. Rational approximants systematically represent branch cuts as strings of poles, and distinguishing a genuine subleading singularity from an artifact of this representation is non-trivial. The paper states that poles 'converge under increase of the truncation order' (§3.2) but does not provide a systematic convergence analysis (e.g., tracking pole positions as a function of Padé order or AAA support points). Since the subleading singularity is load-bearing for the paper's central claims — it appears in Fig. 1, underpins the bouncing-geöw
  2. §3.3, Figs. 5–6: The claim that both singularities 'persist all the way down to zero temperature' (abstract, §1, §3.3) is based on numerical data limited to β ≲ 30. The extrapolation to β → ∞ is stated qualitatively ('seems to approach a constant value ∼2.8'). Given that this persistence claim is a central result, a more quantitative assessment of the large-β asymptotics — or at minimum a clear statement of the limitations of the extrapolation — would strengthen the paper.
  3. §4, Eq. (4.17): The proposed asymptotic expansion of the spectral density ρ(ω) ~ A ω^α e^{-τ*ω} + B ω^γ e^{-τ_c ω} + ⋯ is presented as a generalization of the WKB result, but the subleading piece with complex τ_c is not derived from the SD equations. Unlike the leading singularity, where the WKB self-consistency argument of §3.4 fixes both the power and residue, there is no analogous analytical argument for the subleading singularity. The bouncing-geodesic interpretation in §4 is qualitative and does not predict t_c or its structure. This gap should be clearly acknowledged as a limitation, and the claims about the subleading singularity should be appropriately qualified.
minor comments (5)
  1. §2.3, Eq. (2.32): The expansion coefficients are given to O(β^6); it would be useful to state explicitly how many orders were computed for the Padé resummation used in the figures.
  2. Fig. 7: The y-axis label and the convergence behavior of the residue estimate could be clearer. It would help to indicate the Padé order or numerical parameters used.
  3. §3.3: The statement that the numerical approach 'cannot be pushed to values of β much higher than 30' should briefly explain the limiting factor (convergence of the damped iteration, UV cutoff Λ, etc.).
  4. The paper notes overlap with [32] (Dodelson, Gupta, Mezei, Wang). A brief clarification of the specific novelty beyond that work — particularly regarding the complex-time singularity structure vs. the frequency-space quasinormal analysis — would help the reader.
  5. §4, Eq. (4.13): The estimate z_cap ≈ 1.4/J is derived from the leading singularity only; the connection to the subleading singularity and the bouncing-geodesic picture is not made quantitative. This could be clarified or flagged as speculative.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful reading and constructive comments. The referee correctly identifies the main analytical contribution of the paper (the WKB self-consistency argument for the leading singularity) and raises three substantive points regarding: (1) the lack of a systematic convergence analysis for the rational approximants used to identify the subleading singularity, (2) the qualitative nature of the β→∞ extrapolation, and (3) the absence of an analytical derivation for the subleading singularity. We address each below and indicate revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §3.2, §3.3, Fig. 4: The identification of the subleading (off-axis) singularity relies entirely on rational approximation methods... no systematic convergence analysis provided... distinguishing a genuine subleading singularity from an artifact is non-trivial.

    Authors: The referee raises a valid concern. We agree that a systematic convergence analysis — tracking pole positions as a function of Padé order and AAA support points — is necessary to substantiate the identification of the subleading singularity, and the current manuscript does not provide this. We will add such an analysis in the revised manuscript. Specifically, we will include plots showing the positions of the leading and first subleading poles as the Padé truncation order is increased (at fixed β) and as the number of AAA support points is varied, demonstrating that the subleading pole position stabilizes while spurious poles (Froissart doublets) do not. We will also add a more explicit discussion of the known limitation that rational approximants represent branch cuts as strings of poles, and explain the criteria we use to distinguish convergent poles from artifacts (stability under order increase, agreement between the two independent methods, and absence of nearby pole-zero pairs characteristic of Froissart doublets). We note that the leading singularity, which is the most robust result of the paper, is independently established by the WKB argument of §3.4 and the residue check of Fig. 7, and does not rely solely on rational approximation. The subleading singularity, by contrast, is supported by the agreement between the two methods and the convergence analysis we will add, but we will qualify its status accordingly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §3.3, Figs. 5–6: The claim that both singularities 'persist all the way down to zero temperature' is based on numerical data limited to β ≲ 30. The extrapolation to β → ∞ is stated qualitatively.

    Authors: This is a fair point. The data we present is indeed limited to β ≲ 30, and the extrapolation to β → ∞ is currently qualitative. We will make two changes in the revision. First, we will add a clear and explicit statement of the limitations of the extrapolation, noting that our numerical methods become unreliable beyond β ≈ 30 due to the increasing density of Matsubara frequencies and convergence difficulties in the iterative SD solver. Second, we will provide a more quantitative assessment of the large-β asymptotics by fitting the β-dependence of τ*(β) and t_c(β) to a functional form (e.g., constant plus power-law corrections in 1/β) and reporting the fitted asymptotic values with error estimates. We note that independent support for the τ* → const. behavior at low temperature comes from the exponential fit of the spectral density in [40] (Gu, Kitaev, Zhang), which found τ* ≈ 2.8/J at low temperatures — this is already mentioned in the manuscript but we will make the connection more prominent. For the subleading singularity, no such independent check exists, and we will state this clearly. We will also soften the language in the abstract and introduction from 'persist all the way down to zero temperature' to 'appear to persist down to the lowest temperatures accessible to our numerical methods, with evidence for convergence to finite values.' revision: yes

  3. Referee: §4, Eq. (4.17): The subleading piece with complex τ_c is not derived from the SD equations. No analogous analytical argument for the subleading singularity. The bouncing-geodesic interpretation is qualitative.

    Authors: The referee is correct. Unlike the leading singularity, where the WKB self-consistency argument of §3.4 fixes both the power-law exponent and the residue from the SD equations, we do not have an analogous analytical derivation for the subleading singularity. The proposed asymptotic form (4.17) for the spectral density, including the subleading piece with complex τ_c, is a conjecture motivated by the numerical observations and the analogy with holographic correlators. The bouncing-geodesic interpretation in §4 is qualitative and does not predict τ_c or its local structure. We will revise the manuscript to clearly acknowledge this as a limitation. Specifically, we will: (a) add an explicit statement in §4 that the subleading term in (4.17) is not derived from the SD equations but is a phenomenological ansatz motivated by numerical data and holographic analogy; (b) qualify the bouncing-geodesic interpretation as a qualitative analogy rather than a derivation; and (c) note that developing a WKB-type self-consistency argument for the subleading singularity — or an alternative analytical framework — is an open problem that we leave for future work. We believe the paper's main analytical result (the WKB derivation of the leading singularity) stands on its own merits, and the subleading singularity discussion is best framed as a numerical observation with a tentative holographic interpretation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; WKB self-consistency is a genuine derivation, τ* is numerically extracted not fitted, and self-citations are not load-bearing for the central results.

full rationale

The paper's central results are derived from the standard large-N SYK Schwinger-Dyson equations (Eq. 2.6), which are not defined in terms of the paper's target outputs. The WKB argument in §3.4 is a self-consistency calculation: it assumes a spectral form ρ(ω) ~ A ω^α e^{-τ* ω} (Eq. 3.2), derives constraints on α and A by feeding this ansatz through the SD equations (Eqs. 3.6–3.9), and obtains α and A as outputs (Eq. 3.10). The value τ* itself is not predicted analytically — it is extracted numerically (Fig. 5) and not fitted to a target quantity. The residue prediction (Eq. 3.16, residue = √2 for q=4) is independently verified against numerics (Fig. 7) and checked against the large-q limit (Eq. 3.14). The subleading singularity is identified via two independent rational approximation methods (Padé and AAA), which the skeptic correctly notes share systematic tendencies, but this is a correctness/robustness concern rather than circularity: the paper does not define its inputs in terms of the subleading singularity's location, nor does it fit parameters to force the result. Self-citations [34,35] by present authors appear in the context of thermal bootstrap frameworks (§2.3) but are not load-bearing for the singularity analysis — the double-expansion algorithm is derived directly from the SD equations. The citation to [25] (co-authored by present authors) provides prior infinite-temperature results that are extended, not a uniqueness theorem invoked to forbid alternatives. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or postulated entities. The 'effective temperature' and 'UV cap' are interpretations of computed quantities, not new postulated objects. The free parameters are numerical extraction results (τ*, t_c) and algorithmic choices (Λ, λ_n), not theoretical postulates. The WKB ansatz is a domain assumption borrowed from the universal operator growth hypothesis.

free parameters (5)
  • q (interaction order) = 4
    Fixed to q=4 for all numerical results; not fitted but a choice of model parameter.
  • τ* (leading singularity location) = ~2.8/J
    Extracted numerically from SD solutions; not predicted analytically. The WKB argument fixes the power and residue but not the location.
  • t_c (subleading singularity location) = Re~1.2, Im~5.5 (at low T)
    Extracted numerically; varies mildly with temperature.
  • Λ (UV cutoff for numerics) = not specified
    Numerical grid parameter; value not stated in paper.
  • λ_n (mixing/damping parameter) = starts at 1/2, adaptively halved
    Numerical stabilization parameter for the fixed-point iteration; updated heuristically per eq. 2.46.
axioms (5)
  • standard math Large-N factorization truncates the Schwinger-Dyson equations to G^{-1} = -iω - Σ, Σ = J^2 G^{q-1}
    Standard in SYK literature since [22]; invoked in §2.1, eq. 2.6.
  • domain assumption WKB ansatz: high-frequency spectral density has form ρ(ω) ~ A ω^α e^{-τ* ω}
    Assumed in §3.4, eq. 3.2; equivalent to the universal operator growth hypothesis [31]. Not derived from SD equations but imposed as a self-consistency condition.
  • domain assumption Pade approximants converge to the true analytic structure of the correlator
    Implicit in §3.2; the singularities are identified as poles of Pade approximants that stabilize under increasing order. No rigorous convergence proof is given.
  • domain assumption The AAA rational approximation faithfully captures singularities of the numerical solution
    Used in §3.2 for extracting poles from numerical data on the real axis. The paper notes it is more stable than alternatives but does not prove convergence.
  • ad hoc to paper The subleading singularity corresponds to bouncing null geodesics in the emergent geometry
    Stated in abstract and §4; supported by analogy with holographic results [3,6,7] but not derived from the SYK side.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 23434 in / 3145 out tokens · 261672 ms · 2026-07-07T21:06:08.315658+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 33 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    G. T. Horowitz and V. E. Hubeny,Quasinormal modes of AdS black holes and the approach to thermal equilibrium,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 024027, [hep-th/9909056]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  2. [2]

    S. A. Hartnoll and S. P. Kumar,AdS black holes and thermal Yang-Mills correlators, JHEP12(2005) 036, [hep-th/0508092]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  3. [3]

    The Black Hole Singularity in AdS/CFT

    L. Fidkowski, V. Hubeny, M. Kleban, and S. Shenker,The Black hole singularity in AdS / CFT,JHEP02(2004) 014, [hep-th/0306170]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  4. [4]

    On geodesic propagators and black hole holography

    J. Louko, D. Marolf, and S. F. Ross,On geodesic propagators and black hole holography,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 044041, [hep-th/0002111]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  5. [5]

    Inside the Horizon with AdS/CFT

    P. Kraus, H. Ooguri, and S. Shenker,Inside the horizon with AdS / CFT,Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 124022, [hep-th/0212277]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  6. [6]

    Excursions beyond the horizon: Black hole singularities in Yang-Mills theories (I)

    G. Festuccia and H. Liu,Excursions beyond the horizon: Black hole singularities in Yang-Mills theories. I.,JHEP04(2006) 044, [hep-th/0506202]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    Black Hole Singularity from OPE

    N. ˇCeplak, H. Liu, A. Parnachev, and S. Valach,Black hole singularity from OPE, JHEP10(2024) 105, [arXiv:2404.17286]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    ˇCeplak, H

    N. ˇCeplak, H. Liu, A. Parnachev, and S. Valach,Fooling the censor: going beyond inner horizons with the OPE,JHEP05(2026) 001, [arXiv:2511.09638]

    work page arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    I. J. Araya, C. Esper, Y. Jia, M. Kulaxizi, and A. Parnachev,Bulkcone Singularities and Complex Geodesics,arXiv:2602.12893

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    Imprint of the black hole singularity on thermal two-point functions

    N. Afkhami-Jeddi, S. Caron-Huot, J. Chakravarty, and A. Maloney,Imprint of the black hole singularity on thermal two-point functions,arXiv:2510.21673

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    H. F. Jia and M. Rangamani,Thermal spectral function asymptotics and black hole singularity in holography,arXiv:2512.15114

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    Ali Ahmad, A

    S. Ali Ahmad, A. Almheiri, and S. Lin,Continuing past the inner horizon using WKB,arXiv:2601.02354

    work page arXiv

  13. [13]

    Bouncing singularities and thermal correlators on line defects

    S. Giombi, Y.-Z. Li, and J. Shan,Bouncing singularities and thermal correlators on line defects,arXiv:2603.11012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    H. F. Jia and M. Rangamani,Exact holographic thermal spectral functions: OPE, non-perturbative corrections, and black hole singularity,arXiv:2604.10803. – 27 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    The Ambient Space Formalism

    E. Parisini, K. Skenderis, and B. Withers,The ambient space formalism,JHEP05 (2024) 296, [arXiv:2312.03820]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Jia and M

    Y. Jia and M. Kulaxizi,Bulk Phase Shift and Singularity,arXiv:2602.06558

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    Arnaudo and B

    P. Arnaudo and B. Withers,Analytic structure of holographic thermal correlators from Fourier series,JHEP06(2026) 205, [arXiv:2603.13469]

    work page arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    Grozdanov, S

    S. Grozdanov, S. Valach, and M. Vrbica,Bouncing geodesics, black hole singularities, and singularities of thermal correlators,arXiv:2603.15598

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    Bouncing Geodesics, Singularities, and the Cavity Thermal Product Formula in Asymptotically Flat and de Sitter Black Holes

    S. Grozdanov, V. Movrin, and S. Valach,Bouncing Geodesics, Singularities, and the Cavity Thermal Product Formula in Asymptotically Flat and de Sitter Black Holes, arXiv:2606.11297

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Gapless Spin-Fluid Ground State in a Random Quantum Heisenberg Magnet

    S. Sachdev and J. Ye,Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisenberg magnet,Phys. Rev. Lett.70(1993) 3339, [cond-mat/9212030]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  21. [21]

    A simple model of quantum holography

    A. Kitaev, “A simple model of quantum holography.” http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev/ http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev2/, 2015. Talks at KITP, April 7, 2015 and May 27, 2015

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Comments on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford,Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,Phys. Rev. D94(2016), no. 10 106002, [arXiv:1604.07818]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    The soft mode in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model and its gravity dual

    A. Kitaev and S. J. Suh,The soft mode in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model and its gravity dual,JHEP05(2018) 183, [arXiv:1711.08467]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    Dodelson,Ringdown in the SYK model,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 081, [arXiv:2408.05790]

    M. Dodelson,Ringdown in the SYK model,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 081, [arXiv:2408.05790]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Dodelson, C

    M. Dodelson, C. Iossa, and R. Karlsson,Bouncing off a stringy singularity, arXiv:2511.09616

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    Chaos in AdS$_2$ holography

    K. Jensen,Chaos in AdS 2 Holography,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016), no. 11 111601, [arXiv:1605.06098]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  27. [27]

    Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang,Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,PTEP2016(2016), no. 12 12C104, [arXiv:1606.01857]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  28. [28]

    A bound on chaos

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford,A bound on chaos,JHEP08(2016) 106, [arXiv:1503.01409]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  29. [29]

    An obstacle to sub-AdS holography for SYK-like models

    P. Zhang, Y. Gu, and A. Kitaev,An obstacle to sub-AdS holography for SYK-like models,JHEP21(2020) 094, [arXiv:2012.01620]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    J. S. Cotler, G. Gur-Ari, M. Hanada, J. Polchinski, P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, A. Streicher, and M. Tezuka,Black Holes and Random Matrices,JHEP 05(2017) 118, [arXiv:1611.04650]. [Erratum: JHEP 09, 002 (2018)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    D. E. Parker, X. Cao, A. Avdoshkin, T. Scaffidi, and E. Altman,A Universal – 28 – Operator Growth Hypothesis,Phys. Rev. X9(2019), no. 4 041017, [arXiv:1812.08657]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    On the temperature dependence of quasinormal modes in SYK and holography

    M. Dodelson, O. Gupta, M. Mezei, and D. Wang,On the temperature dependence of quasinormal modes in SYK and holography,arXiv:2606.22679

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Quantum Epidemiology: Operator Growth, Thermal Effects, and SYK

    X.-L. Qi and A. Streicher,Quantum Epidemiology: Operator Growth, Thermal Effects, and SYK,JHEP08(2019) 012, [arXiv:1810.11958]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Thermal holographic correlators and KMS condition

    I. Buri´ c, I. Gusev, and A. Parnachev,Thermal holographic correlators and KMS condition,JHEP09(2025) 053, [arXiv:2505.10277]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Buri´ c, I

    I. Buri´ c, I. Gusev, and A. Parnachev,Holographic correlators from thermal bootstrap,JHEP05(2026) 059, [arXiv:2508.08373]

    work page arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    Niarchos, C

    V. Niarchos, C. Papageorgakis, A. Stratoudakis, and M. Woolley,Deep finite temperature bootstrap,Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 12 126012, [arXiv:2508.08560]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Barrat, D

    J. Barrat, D. N. Bozkurt, E. Marchetto, A. Miscioscia, and E. Pomoni,Analytic thermal bootstrap meets holography,JHEP05(2026) 180, [arXiv:2510.20894]

    work page arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    A. C. Antoulas and B. D. Q. Anderson,On the scalar rational interpolation problem, IMA Journal of Mathematical Control and Information3(1986), no. 2-3 61–88

    work page 1986

  39. [39]

    Nakatsukasa, O

    Y. Nakatsukasa, O. S` ete, and L. N. Trefethen,The aaa algorithm for rational approximation,SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing40(Jan., 2018) A1494–A1522

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Y. Gu, A. Kitaev, and P. Zhang,A two-way approach to out-of-time-order correlators,JHEP03(2022) 133, [arXiv:2111.12007]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    E. A. Cruz and G. Tarnopolsky,Precise low-temperature expansions for the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,Phys. Rev. B108(2023), no. 3 035103, [arXiv:2206.13547]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    W. Fu, D. Gaiotto, J. Maldacena, and S. Sachdev,Supersymmetric Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models,Phys. Rev. D95(2017), no. 2 026009, [arXiv:1610.08917]. [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 069904 (2017)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  43. [43]

    A new class of SYK-like models with maximal chaos

    E. Marcus and S. Vandoren,A new class of SYK-like models with maximal chaos, JHEP01(2019) 166, [arXiv:1808.01190]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    Marcus,Black Holes and Revelations Investigating Black Holes using String Theory, SYK-Models and Quark-Gluon Plasmas

    E. Marcus,Black Holes and Revelations Investigating Black Holes using String Theory, SYK-Models and Quark-Gluon Plasmas. PhD thesis, Utrecht U., 2021

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    I. R. Klebanov, F. Popov, and G. Tarnopolsky,TASI Lectures on LargeNTensor Models,PoST ASI2017(2018) 004, [arXiv:1808.09434]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [46]

    More on Supersymmetric and 2d Analogs of the SYK Model

    J. Murugan, D. Stanford, and E. Witten,More on Supersymmetric and 2d Analogs of the SYK Model,JHEP08(2017) 146, [arXiv:1706.05362]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [47]

    A 3d disordered superconformal fixed point

    C.-M. Chang, S. Colin-Ellerin, C. Peng, and M. Rangamani,A 3d disordered superconformal fixed point,JHEP11(2021) 211, [arXiv:2108.00027]. – 29 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    $\mathcal{N}=(0,2)$ SYK, Chaos and Higher-Spins

    C. Peng,N= (0,2)SYK, Chaos and Higher-Spins,JHEP12(2018) 065, [arXiv:1805.09325]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    Disordered vector models: from higher spins to incipient strings

    C.-M. Chang, S. Colin-Ellerin, C. Peng, and M. Rangamani,Disordered Vector Models: From Higher Spins to Incipient Strings,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022), no. 1 011603, [arXiv:2112.09157]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Viswanath and G

    V. Viswanath and G. Mueller,The recursion method. Application to many-body dynamics, vol. 23. Springer., 1994

    work page 1994

  51. [51]

    Parcollet and A

    O. Parcollet and A. Georges,Non-Fermi-liquid regime of a doped Mott insulator, Phys. Rev. B59(1999), no. 8 5341. – 30 –

    work page 1999