Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 149 references

Understanding Pulsar Magnetospheres with the SKAO

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The SKA's first full configurations can provide the observations needed to settle how pulsars emit radio waves.

desk verdict A comprehensive, well-grounded SKA pulsar magnetosphere review whose central 'solve the problem' claim outruns what the chapter itself shows. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.05432 v2 pith:RNZO4XHQ submitted 2026-07-03 astro-ph.HE

L. S. Oswald , A. Basu , M. Chakraborty , B. C. Joshi , N. Lewandowska , K. Liu , M. E. Lower , A. Philippov
show 16 more authors
X. Song P. Tarafdar J. van Leeuwen A. L. Watts P. Weltevrede G. Wright J. Benáček A. Beri S. Cao P. Esposito F. Jankowski J. C. Jiang A. Karastergiou K. J. Lee N. Rea D. Vohl
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords pulsarmagnetospheresradioemissionmechanismSKApolarizationsubpulsedriftingneutronstarmagneticfieldpopulationevolutionfastbursts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This chapter argues that the Square Kilometre Array, at the AA* and AA4 deployment stages, will have the sensitivity, bandwidth, and sub-array flexibility to solve the long-standing problem of pulsar radio emission physics. The authors review a decade of advances, from magnetic-field geometry and polarization to subpulse drifting and magnetosphere simulations, and frame them around five open questions. Their central claim is that a combination of large-scale pulsar monitoring surveys, in-depth follow-up of unusual sources, and coordinated multi-wavelength observations will provide the population-wide data needed to discriminate between competing emission mechanisms. A sympathetic reader would take this as a concrete scientific program with a testable payoff: if the arrays perform as specified, the emission mechanism is no longer an open problem.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing instrument is the SKA in its AA* and AA4 configurations: 307 of 512 SKA-Low stations and 80 of 133 SKA-Mid dishes combined with the 64 existing MeerKAT dishes, totaling 144 dishes. The argument rests on three capabilities: high sensitivity (about three to four times MeerKAT at similar frequencies), broad instantaneous bandwidth with full-Stokes polarization, and sub-arraying that allows simultaneous monitoring of many pulsars. These convert single-source case studies into population-scale tests, and they are what make the proposed survey-plus-follow-up program capable of separating intrinsic emission from propagation and geometry effects.

What would settle it

Compare SKA-Mid's delivered sensitivity and Band 5b performance against the design figures assumed in the chapter; if the array does not reach roughly three to four times MeerKAT sensitivity, or if the sub-array scheduling cannot support simultaneous monitoring, the claim that these observations will settle the emission mechanism loses its basis. Equally, a monitoring survey that fails to sharpen the existing correlations with spin-down energy would count against the program's power.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that the SKA telescopes will achieve the advances necessary to solve the problem of pulsar radio emission physics in the coming years. The mechanism is a two-pronged observing strategy: broad-band, full-Stokes monitoring of a large fraction of the pulsar population to extract statistical trends, and high time-resolution follow-up of individual sources and newly discovered objects. The key enablers are the high instantaneous sensitivity of SKA-Mid and SKA-Low (roughly three to four times higher than the current Southern-hemisphere array MeerKAT), the wide instantaneous bandwidths, the capacity to sub-array and observe many pulsars simultaneously, and SKA-Mid

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative promises rest on the SKA AA* and AA4 arrays being delivered with the designed sensitivity, bandwidth, and sub-array capability; if actual performance falls short, the proposed observing programs would be less decisive than claimed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A large-scale SKA pulsar monitoring survey will map how profile shape, polarization fraction, and subpulse drifting depend on spin-down energy, giving a population-level test of emission models.
  • Broad-band full-Stokes observations will separate magnetospheric propagation effects, such as orthogonal polarization modes and birefringence, from the intrinsic emission mechanism.
  • SKA-Mid Band 5b observations above 10 GHz will, for the first time, probe the high-frequency emission of a large pulsar sample, testing radius-to-frequency mapping and high-altitude emission components.
  • High-sensitivity single-pulse studies will test whether quasi-periodic substructure scales with rotation period across pulsars, magnetars, and possibly fast radio bursts.
  • Eclipse monitoring of the double pulsar with SKA-Mid will constrain the pair multiplicity and magnetic-field structure of the eclipsing magnetosphere.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same sub-array flexibility could enable simultaneous multi-frequency monitoring of one pulsar, a mode the chapter mentions but does not fully develop as a standalone program.
  • If the scaling of quasi-periodic substructure holds across the newly discovered population, SKA single-pulse data would effectively turn the substructure period into a neutron-star rotation-period estimator for objects where timing is difficult.
  • Population-wide statistics may also feed back into pulsar timing arrays, since identifying and modeling variable profile components reduces a noise source in gravitational-wave background searches.
  • The proposed sensitivity would allow systematic searches for weak radio emission from radio-quiet magnetars, potentially connecting the magnetar and fast-radio-burst populations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This chapter, prepared for the SKA II volume, reviews the past decade of progress in pulsar magnetosphere physics and argues that the SKA telescopes—particularly the AA* and AA4 configurations—will provide the observations needed to resolve the five key open questions: magnetic-field geometry, intrinsic emission spectra, time variability, global magnetosphere physics, and population evolution. It synthesizes results from MeerKAT, Murriyang, LOFAR, FAST, and other facilities, and closes by recommending a large-scale monitoring survey, sub-arraying, broad-band full-Stokes observations, and follow-up of individual sources such as the double pulsar. The central forward-looking claim is that these observations 'will achieve the advances necessary to solve the problem of pulsar radio emission physics.'

Significance. The chapter is a comprehensive and generally well-calibrated review of the current observational and theoretical landscape. Its main strengths are the breadth of the synthesis, the concrete discussion of recent single-pulse and polarization measurements, and the explicit acknowledgement that simulations have not yet reproduced several observed phenomena (e.g., spark structures, time variability). If SKA performs as assumed, the proposed monitoring programs would clearly produce higher-quality data over a larger sample, and several individual investigations—such as the eclipse mapping of PSR J0737−3039A/B—are persuasive and well motivated. However, the chapter makes no quantitative predictions or model-comparison calculations; its significance rests on the sufficiency argument that the proposed observations will actually break the degeneracies between competing emission models. That sufficiency is asserted rather than demonstrated, and the body of the text itself lists multiple unresolved gaps.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §7 Conclusions] The claim that the AA*/AA4 observations 'will achieve the advances necessary to solve the problem of pulsar radio emission physics' is not supported by the body of the chapter. The text itself states that simulations have not generated spark structures (§3.1), that mechanisms driving time-variability have not been uncovered by simulations (§4.1), and that simulations cannot yet replicate the full complexity of observations (§4.5). Similarly, §1.1 and §2.2 show that RVM fitting and OPM decomposition remain ambiguous for most pulsars. Unless the authors can specify a concrete, falsifiable pathway by which the proposed observations discriminate between, for example, carousel and fan-beam models, the abstract and conclusions should be tempered to 'substantial progress' rather than 'solve.' This is a load-bearing issue because the chapter's stated purpose is built on this claim.
  2. [§4.2] The statement that SKA-Mid will be 'approximately three to four times more sensitive than MeerKAT at similar observing frequencies' is given without citation or derivation. This factor is then used to argue that one SKA observation equals four averaged MeerKAT observations, which in turn motivates the eclipse-measurement program. Since the actual sensitivity depends on the specific AA* and AA4 configurations and on observing band, the claim should either be referenced to an official SKA sensitivity table or explicitly labeled as an assumption. Without this, a key quantitative premise of the proposed program is unverified.
  3. [§6.2] The proposed observing program (items 1–5) lists broad categories—surveys, monitoring, follow-up—but does not state expected sample sizes, signal-to-noise thresholds, or observational signatures that would rule out or favor specific emission models. For a chapter whose central claim is that these observations will solve the emission problem, at least one concrete example is needed: e.g., 'a measurement of X in a sample of N pulsars would distinguish carousel from fan-beam geometries.' Without such a link, the recommendations are a reasonable extension of current surveys but do not establish sufficiency.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; §6.2] The terms 'AA*' and 'AA4' are used without explicit definition at first occurrence. Since readers may not know these are SKA construction milestones, define them (e.g., array configuration names) and use consistent notation. Note also the 'AA★' symbol in §4.2.
  2. [§2.2] The phrase 'heteroscedasticity along this morphological sequence' is accurate but jargon-heavy; a brief explanation would help the non-specialist reader.
  3. [Fig. 5] The axes in the P–Pdot diagram are not labeled in the figure preview; ensure the published figure includes axis labels and units.
  4. [References] Several references are to in-press AASKAII companion chapters (e.g., Keane et al. 2026, Shannon et al. 2026, Tiburzi et al. 2026). These are appropriate for the volume but should be marked as forthcoming with arXiv IDs where available.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the chapter is a review with no fitted parameters or predictions that reduce to inputs.

full rationale

This is a review/prospects chapter, not a derivation or modeling paper. It reports observational and simulation results from the literature and proposes future SKA observing programs. There is no quantity in the paper that is fitted from a subset of data and then presented as a prediction; the forward-looking statements (e.g., that AA* and AA4 observations 'will achieve the advances necessary to solve the problem of pulsar radio emission physics') are programmatic claims, not derived results. The authors do cite their own previous work extensively, but these citations are used as ordinary references to published observations (e.g., Oswald et al. 2023a, Song et al. 2023, Basu et al. 2024, Lower et al. 2024b) and not as load-bearing unverified premises. The manuscript itself is candid about the limitations of current simulations, noting that they 'have not generated spark structures' and 'cannot yet replicate the full complexity of observations.' Such statements weaken the persuasiveness of the future-science claims, but they are not instances of circular reasoning: no equation is defined in terms of another, no fitted value is relabeled a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work to force a conclusion. The central claims are therefore self-contained in the sense relevant to circularity analysis, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity (score 0).

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The chapter is a review, so it introduces no free parameters or new entities. Its central claim depends on the future performance of the SKA and on the adequacy of standard models in pulsar astrophysics.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The SKA AA* and AA4 configurations will be deployed as planned with the stated sensitivity, bandwidth, and sub-array capability.
    Quantitative promises in Section 6, e.g., 'approximately three to four times more sensitive than MeerKAT' (Section 4.2), depend on the design parameters being met.
  • domain assumption Existing pulsar emission and magnetosphere models (RVM, Goldreich-Julian/Ruderman-Sutherland, force-free and PIC simulations) are adequate starting points for interpreting observations.
    Sections 1.1 and 4.1 build the review's interpretive framework on these models, while acknowledging their limitations.
  • domain assumption The pulsar catalogue (ATNF psrcat) is complete and accurate for the statistical discussions.
    Section 5 uses psrcat data (4,343 pulsars) for the P-Pdot diagram and population trends.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Understanding Pulsar Magnetospheres with the SKAO." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RNZO4XHQ

@misc{pith2026260705432,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Understanding Pulsar Magnetospheres with the SKAO},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RNZO4XHQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.05432}
}
read the original abstract

The SKA telescopes will bring unparalleled sensitivity across a broad radio band, a wide field of view across the Southern sky, and the capacity for sub-arraying, all of which make them the ideal instruments for studying the pulsar magnetosphere. This chapter describes the advances that have been made in pulsar magnetosphere physics over the last decade, and details how these have been made possible through the advances of modern radio telescopes, particularly SKA precursors and pathfinders. It explains how the SKA telescopes would transform the field of pulsar magnetosphere physics through a combination of large-scale monitoring surveys and in-depth follow-up observations of unique sources and new discoveries. Finally, it describes how the specific observing opportunities available with the AA* and AA4 configurations will achieve the advances necessary to solve the problem of pulsar radio emission physics in the coming years.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.05432 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Average of four MeerKAT UHF polarization light curves of PSR J0737−3039A being eclipsed by the truncated dipolar magnetosphere of PSR J0737−3039B. Top panel shows the linear polarization position angle (Ψ), middle is the ellipticity angle (𝜒) and the lower panel depicts the changes in total intensity (𝐼; black solid line), total linear polarization (𝐿; dashed orange line) and circular polarization (𝑉; dash-dotted pu… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Two examples of integrated pulse profiles of pulsars observed with the Murriyang radio telescope using its Ultra-Wideband receiver. The full frequency resolution of the receiver (704–4032 MHz) is split into 8 subbands, and the pulse profiles displayed here are taken from the subband centred at 1400 MHz. In each case the top subplot shows the position angle (PA) of the linear polarization, and the bottom subplot show… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. An example of a pulsar with profile variability as identified in the Thousand-Pulsar-Array project with MeerKAT. The figure is similar to that in Basu et al. (2024), but includes more recent data. The top panel shows the average pulse profile of PSR J1141−3322. The colour map in the lower left panel shows the phase resolved temporal evolution of profile shape of the pulsar (for details see Basu et al. 2024). The low… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of the dipolar magnetic field of a pulsar where key regions of interest are highlighted. The inner and outer magnetosphere are defined by the regions within and beyond the light-cylinder radius, indicated by the orange cylinder, where the co-rotation veloc…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: This figure shows all of the pulsars discovered to date which have both a measured period 𝑃 and period derivative 𝑃¤, as a function of those two variables. The pulsars are shown with small black dots, and a Gaussian kernel density estimation of the whole distribution i…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

149 extracted references

  1. [4]

    doi: 10.1086/163979

    ISSN 0004-637X. doi: 10.1086/163979. A. Basu et al.MNRAS, 528(4):7458–7476, Mar

    doi:10.1086/163979

  2. [9]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450949

    ISSN 0004-6361. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450949. J. Benáček et al.A&A, 707:A316, Mar

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450949

  3. [11]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab53e7. A. V. Bilous et al.A&A, 658:A143, Feb

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab53e7

  4. [12]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142242. S. Bogdanov et al.ApJL, 887(1):L25, Dec. 2019a. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab53eb. S. Bogdanov et al.ApJL, 887(1):L26, Dec. 2019b. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab5968. S. Bogdanov et al.ApJL, 914(1):L15, June

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142242

  5. [17]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012. 20998.x. M. Caleb et al.Nature Astronomy, 6(7):828–836, jul

    arXiv 2012

  6. [19]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw124. B. Cerutti, A. A. Philippov, and G. Dubus.A&A, 642:A204, Oct

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw124

  7. [21]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451948

    ISSN 14320746. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451948. D. Champion et al.MNRAS, 498(4):6044–6056, Nov

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451948

  8. [22]

    A.Y.Chen,Y.Yuan,andG.Vasilopoulos.ApJL,893(2):L38,Apr.2020

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2764. A.Y.Chen,Y.Yuan,andG.Vasilopoulos.ApJL,893(2):L38,Apr.2020. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ 28 Pulsar Magnetospheres Oswald et al. ab85c5. A. Chernoglazov, A. Philippov, and A. Timokhin.ApJL, 974(2):L32, Oct

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2764 2020

Show all 149 references
  1. [23]

    CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al.Nature, 587(7832):54–58, Nov

    doi: 10.3847/ 2041-8213/ad7e24. CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al.Nature, 587(7832):54–58, Nov

  2. [24]

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04841-8. D. Choudhury et al.ApJL, 971(1):L20, Aug

    doi

  3. [25]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5a6f. I. Contopoulos, D. Kazanas, and C. Fendt.ApJ, 511(1):351–358, mar

    doi

  4. [27]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1813

    ISSN 13652966. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1813. J. M. Cordes.ApJ, 222:1006–1011,

    doi

  5. [28]

    doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0880-2. A. R. Crusius-Wätzel, T. Kunzl, and H. Lesch.ApJ, 546(1):401–405, Jan

    doi

  6. [29]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac2157

    ISSN 2041-8205. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac2157. S. Dai et al.ApJL, 874(2):L14, Apr

    doi

  7. [30]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0e7a. S. J. Dang et al.MNRAS, 528(2):1213–1222, Feb

    doi

  8. [31]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae046. I. de Ruiter et al.Nature Astronomy, 5:1–13, mar

    doi

  9. [32]

    doi: 10.1126/science.aav7272. G. Desvignes et al.Nature Astronomy, 8:617–627, May

    doi

  10. [33]

    doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02226-7. A. J. Dittmann et al.ApJ, 974(2):295, Oct

    doi

  11. [34]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f1e. R. C. Duncan and C. Thompson.ApJL, 392:L9, June

    doi

  12. [36]

    doi: 10.1109/ISAP53582.2022.9998708. J. Dyks.MNRAS, 488(2):2018–2040,

    2022

  13. [37]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1690

    ISSN 13652966. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1690. J. Dyks, P. Weltevrede, and C. Ilie.MNRAS, 501(2):2156–2173, feb

    doi

  14. [38]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3762

    ISSN 13652966. doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3762. R. P. Eatough et al.Nature, 501(7467):391–394, Sept

    doi

  15. [41]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac03b8. V. Gajjar et al.ApJ, 797(1):18, Dec

    doi

  16. [43]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450758. J. D. Gelfand et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    doi

  17. [44]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1501

    ISSN 13652966. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1501. P. Goldreich and W. H. Julian.ApJ, 157:869, Aug

    doi

  18. [50]

    doi: 10.1086/527293. T. H. Hankins, J. S. Kern, J. C. Weatherall, and J. A. Eilek.Nature, 422:141–143, Mar

    doi

  19. [51]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/ 1/47. A. K. Harding and A. G. Muslimov.ApJ, 556(2):987–1001, Aug

    doi

  20. [54]

    H.E.S.S.Collaborationetal.NatureAstronomy,7(11):1341–1350,nov2023

    doi: 10.1126/science.1230960. H.E.S.S.Collaborationetal.NatureAstronomy,7(11):1341–1350,nov2023. ISSN23973366. doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02052-3. G. Hobbs et al.PASA, 37:e012, Apr

    doi

  21. [55]

    doi: 10.1017/pasa.2020.2. M. Hoogkamer et al.Phys. Rev. D, 112(2):023008, July

    2020 doi

  22. [57]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf323

    ISSN 0035-8711. doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf323. N. Hurley-Walker et al.Nature, Volume 601, Issue 7894, p.526-530, 601(7894):526, jan

    doi

  23. [58]

    doi: 10.1038/S41586-021-04272-X

    ISSN 0028-0836. doi: 10.1038/S41586-021-04272-X. D. Íñiguez-Pascual, D. Viganò, and D. F. Torres.MNRAS, 516(2):2475–2485, Oct

    doi

  24. [59]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2275. C. D. Ilie, P. Weltevrede, S. Johnston, and T. Chen.MNRAS, 491(3):3385–3394, Jan

    doi

  25. [60]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3167. P. Janagal et al.MNRAS, 523(4):5934–5946, Aug. 2023a. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1797. P. Janagal, S. J. McSweeney, M. Chakraborty, and N. D. R. Bhat.MNRAS, 524(2):2684–2697, Sept. 2023b. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2056. F. Jankowski et al.Monthly Notices o...

    doi

  26. [62]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2930

    ISSN 0004-637X. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2930. S. Johnston and M. Kramer.MNRAS, 490(4):4565–4574,

    doi

  27. [65]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab550. C. Kalapotharakos, Z. Wadiasingh, A. K. Harding, and D. Kazanas.ApJ, 907(2):63, Feb

    doi

  28. [66]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abcec0. A. Karastergiou et al.MNRAS, 532(3):3558–3566, aug

    doi

  29. [67]

    doi: 10.1017/pasa.2024.30. H. S. Knight.Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement, 6(S2):41–47, Dec

    2024 doi

  30. [68]

    doi: 10.1086/305790. M. Kramer et al.Science, 312(5773):549–551, Apr

    doi

  31. [69]

    doi: 10.1126/science.1124060. M. Kramer et al.MNRAS, 377(1):107–119, May

    doi

  32. [71]

    doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02125-3. J. Krtička et al.Space Sci. Rev., 220(2):24, Mar

    doi

  33. [72]

    doi: 10.1007/s11214-024-01058-1. Y. W. J. Lee et al.Nature Astronomy, pages 1–13, jan

    doi

  34. [74]

    L.Levinetal

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2074. L.Levinetal. InAdvancingAstrophysicswiththeSKA–II(AASKAII).2026. arXivsearch: Report number AASKAII/Levin01. R. Lin et al.ApJ, 945(2):115, Mar

    2026 doi

  35. [75]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acba95. K. Liu et al.MNRAS, 420(1):361–368, Feb

    doi

  36. [77]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4da8. K. Liu et al.MNRAS, 513(3):4037–4044, July

    doi

  37. [78]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1082. W. Lockhart, S. E. Gralla, F. Özel, and D. Psaltis.MNRAS, 490(2):1774–1783, Dec

    doi

  38. [79]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2524. D. R. Lorimer and M. Kramer.Handbook of Pulsar Astronomy

    doi

  39. [81]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3789. M. E. Lower et al.MNRAS, 524(4):5904–5917, oct

    doi

  40. [83]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf427. S. C. Lundgren et al.ApJ, 453:433, Nov

    doi

  41. [85]

    doi: 10.1126/science.1186683. A. G. Lyne et al.Science, 303(5661):1153–1157, Feb

    doi

  42. [86]

    doi: 10.1126/science.1094645. Y. Lyubarsky.MNRAS, 483(2):1731–1736, Feb

    doi

  43. [87]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3233. M. Lyutikov.ApJL, 580(1):L65–L68, Nov

    doi

  44. [89]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt351. M. Lyutikov and C. Thompson.ApJ, 634(2):1223–1241, Dec

    doi

  45. [91]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab3a47. Y. Maan, M. P. Surnis, B. Chandra Joshi, and M. Bagchi.ApJ, 931(1):67, May

    doi

  46. [92]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac68f1. R. N. Manchester, G. B. Hobbs, A. Teoh, and M. Hobbs.ApJ, 129:1993–2006,

    1993 doi

  47. [93]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae145d. M. A. McLaughlin et al.ApJL, 616(2):L131–L134, Dec

    doi

  48. [94]

    doi: 10.1086/426813. S. J. McSweeney et al.ApJ, 933(2):210, July

    doi

  49. [95]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac75bc. Y. Men et al.SciA, 11(3):eadp6351, jan

    doi

  50. [96]

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adp6351

    ISSN 23752548. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adp6351. F. C. Michel.ApJ, 180:207–226, Feb. 1973a. doi: 10.1086/151956. F. C. Michel.ApJL, 180:L133, Mar. 1973b. doi: 10.1086/181169. M. T. Miles et al.MNRAS, 536(2):1467–1488, Jan

    doi

  51. [97]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2572. M. C. Miller et al.ApJL, 887(1):L24, Dec

    doi

  52. [98]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab50c5. M. C. Miller et al.ApJL, 918(2):L28, Sept

    doi

  53. [99]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac089b. D. Mitra, M. Arjunwadkar, and J. M. Rankin.ApJ, 806:236, June

    doi

  54. [101]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629937. A. Naidu, B. C. Joshi, P. K. Manoharan, and M. A. Krishnakumar.MNRAS, 475(2):2375–2382, Apr

    doi

  55. [102]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3284. R. Nan et al.IJMPD, 20(6):989–1024, jun

    doi

  56. [103]

    S.Osłowskietal.MNRAS,418(2):1258–1271,Dec.2011.doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19578.x

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1660. S.Osłowskietal.MNRAS,418(2):1258–1271,Dec.2011.doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19578.x. L. Oswald, A. Karastergiou, and S. Johnston.MNRAS, 496(2):1418–1429, Aug

    2011

  57. [104]

    L.S.Oswaldetal.MNRAS,520(4):4961–4980,feb2023a

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1597. L.S.Oswaldetal.MNRAS,520(4):4961–4980,feb2023a. ISSN0035-8711. doi: 10.1093/mnras/ stad070. L. S. Oswald, A. Karastergiou, and S. Johnston.MNRAS, 525(1):840–853, oct 2023b. ISSN 13652966. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2271. J. Palfreyman et al.Nature, 556...

    doi

  58. [105]

    doi: 10.1038/ s41586-018-0001-x

    ISSN 14764687. doi: 10.1038/ s41586-018-0001-x. A. Parthasarathy et al.MNRAS, 494(2):2012–2026, mar

    2012

  59. [106]

    32 Pulsar Magnetospheres Oswald et al

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab037. 32 Pulsar Magnetospheres Oswald et al. I. Pastor-Marazuela et al.A&A, 678:A149, Oct

    doi

  60. [107]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243339. I. Pastor-Marazuela et al.A&A, 693:A279, Jan

    doi

  61. [108]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450953. A. B. Pearlman et al.ApJ, 866(2):160, Oct

    doi

  62. [109]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aade4d. U. L. Pen, J. P. Macquart, A. T. Deller, and W. Brisken.MNRAS, 440:L36–L40, May

    doi

  63. [110]

    doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slu010. J. Pétri and D. Mitra.A&A, 654:A106, oct

    doi

  64. [112]

    ISSN00664146

    A.PhilippovandM.Kramer.Ann.Rev.Astron.Astrophys.,60:495–558,aug2022. ISSN00664146. doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-112338. A. Philippov, D. A. Uzdensky, A. Spitkovsky, and B. Cerutti.ApJL, 876(1):L6, May

    doi

  65. [113]

    A.Philippov,A.Timokhin,andA.Spitkovsky.PhysicalReviewLetters,124(24):245101,jun2020

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1590. A.Philippov,A.Timokhin,andA.Spitkovsky.PhysicalReviewLetters,124(24):245101,jun2020. ISSN 10797114. doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.124.245101/FIGURES/1/SMALL. A. A. Philippov and A. Spitkovsky.ApJ, 855(2):94, Mar

    doi

  66. [114]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaabbc. B. Posselt et al.MNRAS, 508(3):4249–4268, dec

    doi

  67. [117]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140811. L. Qi et al.ApJ, 981(2):99, Mar

    doi

  68. [118]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb42f. G. J. Qiao et al.ApJL, 616(2):L127–L130, Dec

    doi

  69. [119]

    doi: 10.1086/426862. V. Radhakrishnan and D. J. Cooke.ApJ Lett., 3:225,

    doi

  70. [120]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011525. J. M. Rankin and R. Ramachandran.ApJ, 590(1):411–423, June

    doi

  71. [122]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054417. N. Rea et al.ApJ, 961(2):214, feb

    doi

  72. [123]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad165d

    ISSN 0004-637X. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad165d. D. J. Reardon et al.ApJL, 971(1):L18, Aug

    doi

  73. [124]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad614a. T. E. Riley et al.ApJL, 887(1):L21, Dec

    doi

  74. [125]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab481c. T. E. Riley et al.ApJL, 918(2):L27, Sept

    doi

  75. [126]

    S.C.Rookyard,P.Weltevrede,andS.Johnston.MNRAS,446(4):3367–3388,2015.ISSN13652966

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac0a81. S.C.Rookyard,P.Weltevrede,andS.Johnston.MNRAS,446(4):3367–3388,2015.ISSN13652966. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2236. M. A. Ruderman and P. G. Sutherland.ApJ, 196:51–72,

    doi

  76. [127]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac983d. T. Salmi et al.ApJ, 956(2):138, Oct

    doi

  77. [128]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf49d. T. Salmi et al.ApJ, 974(2):294, Oct. 2024a. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f1f. T. Salmi et al.ApJ, 976(1):58, Nov. 2024b. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad81d2. P. Scholz et al.ApJ, 841(2):126, June

    doi

  78. [129]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa73de. R. M. Shannon et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    doi

  79. [130]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abdc29. J. Singha et al.MNRAS, 507(1):L57–L61, Oct

    doi

  80. [131]

    doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slab098. J. Singha et al.MNRAS, 535(1):1184–1192, Nov

    doi

  81. [132]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2405. D. A. Smith et al.ApJ, 958(2):191, dec

    doi

  82. [133]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acee67

    ISSN 0004-637X. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acee67. V. A. Soglasnov et al.ApJ, 616:439–451, Nov

    doi

  83. [134]

    doi: 10.1086/424908. X. Song et al.MNRAS, 505(3):4456–4467, aug

    doi

  84. [135]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/ staa3805

    ISSN 13652966. doi: 10.1093/mnras/ staa3805. X. Song et al.MNRAS, 520(3):4562–4581, Apr

    doi

  85. [136]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad135. X. Song et al.A&A, 706:A160, Feb

    doi

  86. [137]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555190. S. T. Spencer and A. M. W. Mitchell.A&A, 694:A324, Feb

    doi

  87. [138]

    D.H.StaelinandE.C.Reifenstein,III.Science,162:1481–1483,Dec.1968

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/ 202451276. D.H.StaelinandE.C.Reifenstein,III.Science,162:1481–1483,Dec.1968. doi: 10.1126/science. 162.3861.1481. P. A. Sturrock.ApJ, 164:529, Mar

    1968

  88. [140]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/59. A. Szary et al.ApJ, 934(1):23, July

    doi

  89. [141]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac75e2. J. Takata and K. S. Cheng.ApJ, 834(1):4, Jan

    doi

  90. [142]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/4. J. H. Taylor, G. R. Huguenin, R. M. Hirsch, and R. N. Manchester.Astrophys. Lett., 9:205–208, Aug

    doi

  91. [143]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/275.2

    doi

  92. [144]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts298. P. Torne et al.ApJL, 925(2):L17, Feb

    doi

  93. [145]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac4caa. M. P. Van Haarlem et al.A&A, 556:A2,

    doi

  94. [147]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/752/ 2/155. J. van Leeuwen et al.ApJ, 798(2):118, Jan

    doi

  95. [148]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/798/2/118. S. Vinciguerra et al.ApJ, 961(1):62, Jan

    doi

  96. [149]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acfb83. D. Vohl, J. van Leeuwen, and Y. Maan.A&A, 687:A113, July

    doi

  97. [150]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/ 202348621. C. Wang, D. Lai, and J. Han.MNRAS, 403(2):569–588, Apr

    doi

  98. [151]

    2009.16074.x

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966. 2009.16074.x. P. Wang et al.ApJSS, 275(2):39, Dec

    2009

  99. [152]

    P.WeltevredeandS.Johnston.MNRAS,391(3):1210–1226,Dec.2008a.doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad7c3f. P.WeltevredeandS.Johnston.MNRAS,391(3):1210–1226,Dec.2008a.doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966. 2008.13950.x. P.WeltevredeandS.Johnston.MNRAS,387(4):1755–1760,July2008b. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966. 2008.13382.x. 34 Pulsar Magnetospheres Oswald et al. P.Weltev...

    2008

  100. [153]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066855. P. Weltevrede, S. Johnston, and C. M. Espinoza.MNRAS, 411(3):1917–1934, Mar

    1917 doi

  101. [155]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbfa3

    ISSN 0004-637X. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbfa3. G.Wright.MNRAS,514(3):4046–4060,aug2022. ISSN13652966. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1629. G.WrightandP.Weltevrede.MNRAS,464(3):2597–2608,Jan.2017. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2498. J. Xu et al.A&A, 695:A173, Mar

    2017 doi

  102. [156]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452960. J. Xu et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    doi

  103. [157]

    G.-R.Yao,L.Huang,C.Yu,andZ.-Q.Shen.ApJ,854(1):10,Feb.2018

    arXiv search: Report number AASKAII/JunXu01. G.-R.Yao,L.Huang,C.Yu,andZ.-Q.Shen.ApJ,854(1):10,Feb.2018. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ aaa480. R. Yuen et al.ApJL, 752(2):L32, June

    2018 doi

  104. [158]

    doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/752/2/L32. B. Zhang and A. K. Harding.ApJL, 535(1):L51–L54, May

    doi

  105. [159]

    doi: 10.1086/312694. W. Zhu et al.Science Advances, 9(30):eadf6198, July

    doi

  106. [160]

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adf6198. 35

    doi

  107. [1969]

    doi: 10.1086/150119. D. M. Gould and A. G. Lyne.MNRAS, 301(1):235–260, nov

    doi

  108. [1970]

    doi: 10.1038/226529a0. W. Hermsen et al.Science, 339(6118):436, Jan

    doi

  109. [1971]

    H.Suzuki,A.Bamba,andS.Shibata.ApJ,914(2):103,June2021.doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abfb02

    doi: 10.1086/150865. H.Suzuki,A.Bamba,andS.Shibata.ApJ,914(2):103,June2021.doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abfb02. A. Szary et al.ApJ, 784(1):59, Mar

    doi

  110. [1986]

    doi: 10.1086/163978. F. Ay, G. Ince, M. E. Kamaşak, and K. Y. Ekşi.MNRAS, 493(1):713–722, Mar

    doi

  111. [1992]

    doi: 10.1086/186413. A. Dunning et al.2022 International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation, ISAP 2022, pages 359–360,

    2022 doi

  112. [1995]

    31 Pulsar Magnetospheres Oswald et al

    doi: 10.1086/176404. 31 Pulsar Magnetospheres Oswald et al. R. Lynch et al.AAS, 241:101.04,

    doi

  113. [1998]

    doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.02018.x

    ISSN 00358711. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.02018.x. V. Graber, M. Ronchi, C. Pardo-Araujo, and N. Rea.ApJ, 968(1):16, June

    1998

  114. [1999]

    doi: 10.1086/306652. A. J. Cooper and Z. Wadiasingh.MNRAS, 533(2):2133–2155, sep

    doi

  115. [2000]

    doi: 10.1086/317815. M. E. Lower et al.MNRAS, 502(1):127–139, Mar

    doi

  116. [2001]

    doi: 10.1086/321589. C. Heiles and D. B. Campbell.Nature, 226(5245):529–531, May

    doi

  117. [2002]

    doi: 10.1086/345493. M. Lyutikov.MNRAS, 431(3):2580–2589, May

    doi

  118. [2003]

    doi: 10.1086/374884. J. M. Rankin, R. Ramachandran, J. van Leeuwen, and S. A. Suleymanova.A&A, 455(1):215–221, Aug

    doi

  119. [2004]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041029. E. Fonseca et al.ApJL, 915(1):L12, July

    doi

  120. [2005]

    doi: 10.1086/432252. Y. Maan et al.ApJL, 882(1):L9, Sept

    doi

  121. [2006]

    doi: 10.1038/nature04986. B. Cerutti, A. A. Philippov, and A. Spitkovsky.MNRAS, 457(3):2401–2414, Apr

    doi

  122. [2007]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11622.x. M. Kramer et al.Nature Astronomy, 8:230–240, Feb

    2007

  123. [2008]

    doi: 10.1126/science.1159295. R. P. Breton et al.ApJ, 747(2):89, Mar

    doi

  124. [2009]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/1044. J. Benáček et al.A&A, 691:A137,

    doi

  125. [2010]

    doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/721/1/L33. L. Levin et al.MNRAS, 488(4):5251–5258, Oct

    doi

  126. [2011]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17821.x. A. Weltman and A. Walters.Nature, 587(7832):43–44, Nov

    2010

  127. [2012]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/89. S. Burke-Spolaor et al.MNRAS, 423(2):1351–1367, June

    doi

  128. [2013]

    doi: 10.1038/nature12499. R. T. Edwards.A&A, 426:677–686, Nov

    doi

  129. [2014]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/18. C. R. García, D. F. Torres, and A. Patruno.MNRAS, 515(3):3883–3897, Sept

    doi

  130. [2015]

    D.Mitra,G.I.Melikidze,andR.Basu.MNRAS,521(1):L34–L38,May2023

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/ 806/2/236. D.Mitra,G.I.Melikidze,andR.Basu.MNRAS,521(1):L34–L38,May2023. doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/ slad022. A. Naidu, B. C. Joshi, P. K. Manoharan, and M. A. KrishnaKumar.A&A, 604:A45, Aug

    doi

  131. [2016]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/29. R. Basu, D. Mitra, G. I. Melikidze, and A. Skrzypczak.MNRAS, 482(3):3757–3788, Jan

    doi

  132. [2017]

    doi: 10.18520/cs/v113/ i04/707-714

    ISSN 00113891. doi: 10.18520/cs/v113/ i04/707-714. H. Hakobyan, A. Philippov, and A. Spitkovsky.ApJ, 943(2):105, feb

    doi

  133. [2018]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2476

    ISSN 13652966. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2476. R. J. Jennings et al.The Astrophysical Journal, 964(2):179, apr

    doi

  134. [2019]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2846. A. M. Beloborodov.ApJ, 703(1):1044–1060, Sept

    doi

  135. [2020]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa154. J. J. Barnard and J. Arons.ApJ, 302:138,

    doi

  136. [2021]

    S.Boissieretal.SF2A-2012: ProceedingsoftheAnnualmeetingoftheFrenchSocietyofAstronomy and Astrophysics., page 687, dec

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abfb79. S.Boissieretal.SF2A-2012: ProceedingsoftheAnnualmeetingoftheFrenchSocietyofAstronomy and Astrophysics., page 687, dec

    doi

  137. [2022]

    doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/AC9CED

    ISSN 0034-4885. doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/AC9CED. J. Arons and J. J. Barnard.ApJ, 302:120, Mar

    doi

  138. [2023]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acab05

    ISSN 0004-637X. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acab05. J. P. Halpern et al.ApJ, 676(2):1178–1183, Apr

    doi

  139. [2024]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae483. R. Basu et al.ApJ, 833(1):29, Dec

    doi

  140. [2025]

    doi: 10.1103/cp8c-2nbk. J. A. Hsu et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 538(2):1063–1080, 04

    doi

  141. [2026]

    V.S.BeskinandA.A.Philippov.MNRAS,425(2):814–840,Sept.2012

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554690. V.S.BeskinandA.A.Philippov.MNRAS,425(2):814–840,Sept.2012. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966. 2012.20988.x. A. V. Bilous et al.ApJL, 887(1):L23, Dec

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.