Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 8 minor 38 references

PLED-VINS: A Point-Line Event-Based Visual Inertial SLAM for Dynamic Environments

T0 review · 1 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-07-09 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Event-camera SLAM survives dynamic scenes via entropy-recency scoring

desk verdict Entropy-recency score map is a genuine new idea for event-based dynamic SLAM, but the ablation is too thin to prove it drives the gains. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07374 v1 pith:4WEH2XDM submitted 2026-07-08 cs.RO

Seunghun Lee , Jihun Nam , Dong-Uk Seo , Hyun Myung This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.RO
keywords eventcameravisual-inertialSLAMdynamicenvironmentsentropytemporalreliabilitybundleadjustmentpoint-linefeaturesmotioncompensation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Event cameras asynchronously record per-pixel brightness changes, giving them an edge over conventional cameras in fast-motion and low-light scenes. But most event-camera SLAM systems still assume the world is static, so moving objects inject false geometric constraints and corrupt pose estimates. PLED-VINS tackles this by building an entropy-recency score map: after warping raw events to a reference frame using IMU data, it bins events at each pixel into time intervals, computes the Shannon entropy of that temporal distribution, and combines it with a recency measure that flags late-biased activations. The core idea is that static structures, once motion-compensated, produce temporally structured event patterns, while independently moving objects leave dispersed, recent-biased temporal signatures even after compensation. These temporal reliability scores are then fused with geometric reliability from a robust bundle adjustment that jointly handles point and line features, with an adaptive scheme that shifts weight between temporal and geometric cues depending on motion conditions. The result is a monocular event-camera visual-inertial SLAM system that suppresses dynamic observations without expensive object-level segmentation.

What carries the argument

entropy-recency score map

What would settle it

If one constructed a scene where static structures produce late-biased, high-entropy event distributions after motion compensation — for instance, through rapid camera translation past nearby high-texture surfaces — the entropy-recency score would incorrectly flag them as dynamic, degrading pose estimation rather than improving it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The entropy-recency score map is the central object. It quantifies temporal reliability per pixel by combining two complementary signals: normalized Shannon entropy of motion-compensated event timestamps across temporal bins (capturing dispersion), and a recency score weighted toward later bins (capturing late-biased activation). Their nonlinear symmetric fusion yields a per-pixel score that highlights independently moving objects while suppressing static background and noise. When integrated with geometric reliability from robust bundle adjustment through an adaptive, motion-conditioned weighting strategy, this score map enables a monocular event-camera SLAM system to achieve the lowest ATE

Load-bearing premise

The entropy-recency score map depends on IMU-based motion compensation correctly aligning events from static structures to consistent pixels. If compensation is imperfect — due to depth-dependent parallax, IMU bias drift, or complex multi-body dynamics — static structures produce dispersed temporal distributions indistinguishable from dynamic ones, corrupting the temporal reliability signal.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Event cameras could become the default sensor for SLAM in dynamic environments, replacing frame-based approaches that fail under motion blur and aggressive dynamics.
  • The entropy-recency formulation could extend to multi-motion hypotheses, enabling segmentation of several independently moving objects without explicit object detection.
  • Line-feature motion conditioning could generalize to other geometric primitives (planes, curves) where observability depends on motion direction relative to the primitive's geometry.
  • The approach could integrate with stereo or depth-aware event systems to address the depth-dependent parallax limitation identified by the authors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The entropy-recency score map implicitly performs a soft, per-pixel motion segmentation without requiring object classes or semantic labels, which could make it more generalizable than learning-based dynamic SLAM methods.
  • The 21.25 Hz processing frequency at 240x180 resolution suggests the method is borderline for real-time deployment on higher-resolution event cameras, and the entropy computation over temporal bins may become a bottleneck at scale.
  • The reliance on a single dominant rigid-motion hypothesis means the system should degrade gracefully (falling back to geometric-only weighting) rather than catastrophically when multiple moving objects with comparable event signatures are present, but this remains untested.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper proposes PLED-VINS, a monocular event-camera visual-inertial SLAM framework for dynamic environments. The core technical contributions are: (1) an entropy-recency score map that quantifies temporal reliability of features from motion-compensated event streams, and (2) an adaptive fusion strategy combining temporal and geometric reliability cues (including motion-conditioned modeling for line features) within a unified point-line robust bundle adjustment. The system is evaluated on the VIODE, DAVIS 240C, and DSEC datasets against five baselines, showing consistent ATE/MPE improvements on high-dynamic sequences. The approach is well-motivated and the individual technical components are clearly described.

Significance. The paper addresses a genuine gap: most event-based SLAM frameworks assume static scenes, and existing dynamic-environment methods either rely on expensive segmentation or compress temporal information into single statistics. The entropy-recency score map is a principled contribution that preserves distributional temporal information. The motion-conditioned fusion coefficient for line features (Eqs. 15–17) is a novel and sensible design that accounts for geometric observability. The system achieves real-time performance (21.25 Hz at 240×180). The ablation study (Table III) provides weight-quality metrics (MAE, w_ratio) against ground-truth segmentation labels, which is a more informative evaluation than trajectory error alone. The explicit acknowledgment of the rigid-motion hypothesis limitation in the Conclusion is appropriate. However, the experimental design does not fully isolate the proposed temporal reliability contributions from the addition of line features, and per-dataset hyperparameter variation raises generalization concerns.

major comments (1)
  1. Table III (ablation study) and Tables I–II (main results): The central claim attributes improvement to two novel components—temporal reliability and adaptive fusion—but the experimental design cannot cleanly isolate these from the addition of line features. Tables I–II compare PLED-VINS (point+line, temporal+geometric) against DynaVINS (point-only, geometric-only), conflating the temporal reliability contribution with line feature augmentation. The only controlled ablation (Table III, geometric-only vs. geometric+temporal, both with line features) is run on a single VIODE sequence (parking_lot_high). Without ablations on additional high-dynamic sequences (city_day_high, city_night_high) and the DAVIS 240C sequences, it remains unclear whether the entropy-recency score map generalizes or whether trajectory improvements stem primarily from line features. Adding at least 2–3 more sequences'
minor comments (8)
  1. Section III.B, Eq. (2): The ε appears both inside and outside the logarithm. Clarify whether ε is added before or after taking log, as this affects numerical behavior near zero-probability bins.
  2. Section III.E, Eq. (15): The relationship between α_line and the text description could be clearer. The text states α_line 'increases when r indicates strong alignment and remains high under tangential motion,' but Eq. (15) defines α_line = 1 − p_n(1−r). A brief derivation or intermediate step showing how p_n and r interact to produce the described behavior would improve clarity.
  3. Section IV.B: The use of v2e [36] to generate synthetic events for VIODE is mentioned briefly. A sentence noting the known limitations of v2e (e.g., noise model fidelity) and why they do not undermine the VIODE results would strengthen the evaluation.
  4. Table I: PL-VINS results for parking_lot mid and high are missing (shown as '—'). A footnote explaining why (e.g., tracking failure) would be helpful.
  5. Fig. 6: The y-axis starts at 10^{-1}, which compresses the visual differences. Consider adjusting the axis range or using a log scale to better visualize relative differences.
  6. Section III.C, Eq. (6): The line band width W is listed as a free parameter but its value is not reported in the experimental settings (Section IV.A). Stating the value used would aid reproducibility.
  7. Reference [7] (E2-VINS): The venue is listed as 'Appl. Sci., vol. 15, no. 3, p. 1314, 2025.' Please verify this reference is correctly cited and accessible, as it appears to be a very recent publication.
  8. The paper would benefit from a brief discussion of failure modes beyond the rigid-motion assumption, such as scenarios where the entropy-recency map may produce false positives (e.g., flickering textures).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The referee correctly identifies that our central claim—improvement from temporal reliability and adaptive fusion—is not cleanly isolated from the contribution of line features in the main results tables, and that the ablation study is limited to a single VIODE sequence. We agree this is a legitimate concern and will address it in revision.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Table III (ablation study) and Tables I–II (main results): The central claim attributes improvement to two novel components—temporal reliability and adaptive fusion—but the experimental design cannot cleanly isolate these from the addition of line features. Tables I–II compare PLED-VINS (point+line, temporal+geometric) against DynaVINS (point-only, geometric-only), conflating the temporal reliability contribution with line feature augmentation. The only controlled ablation (Table III, geometric-only vs. geometric+temporal, both with line features) is run on a single VIODE sequence (parking_lot_high). Without ablations on additional high-dynamic sequences (city_day_high, city_night_high) and the DAVIS 240C sequences, it remains unclear whether the entropy-recency score map generalizes or whether trajectory improvements stem primarily from line features. Adding at least 2–3 more sequences'

    Authors: The referee is correct that the current experimental design does not cleanly isolate the temporal reliability contribution from the line feature augmentation. We acknowledge this conflation in Tables I–II, where PLED-VINS (point+line, temporal+geometric) is compared against DynaVINS (point-only, geometric-only). The referee is also correct that the ablation in Table III is limited to a single sequence (parking_lot_high), which is insufficient to demonstrate generalization of the entropy-recency score map. We will address this in the revised manuscript by expanding the ablation study to include at least three additional high-dynamic sequences: city_day_high and city_night_high from VIODE, and the dynamic_6dof sequence from DAVIS 240C. For each sequence, we will report four configurations in a controlled factorial design: (A) point-only + geometric-only (replicating DynaVINS), (B) point+line + geometric-only (isolating the line feature contribution), (C) point-only + geometric+temporal (isolating the temporal reliability contribution), and (D) point+line + geometric+temporal (full model). This design will allow clean attribution of trajectory improvements to each component. We will also extend the weight-quality metrics (MAE, w_ratio) from Table III to the additional VIODE sequences where ground-truth segmentation labels are available. We agree that without these additional ablations, the generalization claim for the entropy-recency score map is not adequately supported. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity found; the derivation is self-contained with independent temporal and geometric reliability signals

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The temporal reliability signal (w_EV, computed from the entropy-recency score map in Eqs. 2-7) is derived from event statistics after IMU-based motion compensation — it is computed independently of the BA optimization and does not depend on the output weights. The geometric reliability (w_BA, from Eq. 8-9) is derived from reprojection residuals in robust BA, extending DynaVINS [3] with line factors. The adaptive fusion (Eqs. 12-17) combines these two independently-computed signals. While the reader notes a recurrent loop where fused weights feed into the next BA iteration, this is an iterative refinement scheme (standard in robust optimization), not a circular definition: the temporal reliability w_EV provides external grounding from event statistics that is not a function of the BA output, and the geometric reliability w_BA is computed from reprojection residuals that depend on the state estimate X, not on the weights themselves. The self-citation to DynaVINS [3] is for the robust BA formulation, which is a prior published method with independent validation, not an unverified ansatz. The hyperparameters (lambda_w, lambda_m) are fitted per-dataset but are tuning parameters, not predictions. The ablation in Table III compares geometric-only vs. geometric+temporal on a single sequence, which is a limited experimental design concern (correctness risk) rather than circularity. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities, particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced. The entropy-recency score map is a new computational representation, not a postulated entity.

free parameters (9)
  • η (TS decay rate) = 20 ms
    Time surface decay parameter; chosen by hand, controls event recency encoding.
  • B (number of temporal bins) = 8
    Number of bins for entropy computation; chosen by hand.
  • α (temporal decay rate for recency) = 2.0
    Controls recency weighting in Eq. 4; chosen by hand.
  • α₀ (base fusion rate) = 0.4
    Base coefficient for adaptive fusion in Eq. 14; chosen by hand.
  • τ (decay parameter) = 0.2
    Controls decay of fusion coefficient in Eq. 14; chosen by hand.
  • λw (weight regularization) = 2.0 (VIODE), 8.0 (DAVIS), 2.0 (DSEC)
    Controls weight regularization in robust loss (Eq. 9); tuned per dataset.
  • λm (momentum factor) = 0.2 (VIODE), 1.0 (DAVIS), 2.0 (DSEC)
    Controls momentum term in robust loss (Eq. 9); tuned per dataset.
  • W (line band width) = not stated
    Width of line band region for temporal reliability aggregation; value not provided.
  • Wtime (time window) = not stated
    Time window for event stream analysis; value not provided.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption A single dominant rigid-motion hypothesis (camera ego-motion from IMU) is sufficient to separate static from dynamic event sources after compensation.
    Section III.B, 'Motion compensation': the entropy-recency score map is built on the assumption that IMU-based compensation aligns static events to consistent pixels. The paper acknowledges this is a limitation in the Conclusion.
  • domain assumption Temporal reliability (event statistics) and geometric reliability (BA residuals) provide complementary information about feature trustworthiness.
    Section III.E: the adaptive fusion strategy assumes the two reliability measures are complementary. The ablation (Table III) provides partial support but only on one sequence.
  • domain assumption The robust BA formulation from DynaVINS [3] correctly estimates geometric reliability as feature weights.
    Section III.D, Eq. 8-9: the geometric reliability estimator directly extends DynaVINS. This is treated as given rather than re-validated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of PLED-VINS: A Point-Line Event-Based Visual Inertial SLAM for Dynamic Environments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4WEH2XDM

@misc{pith2026260707374,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: PLED-VINS: A Point-Line Event-Based Visual Inertial SLAM for Dynamic Environments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4WEH2XDM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07374}
}
read the original abstract

Dynamic environments remain a fundamental challenge for visual SLAM, where unreliable observations from moving objects and rapid motion degrade state estimation accuracy. Although event cameras preserve fine-grained spatio-temporal information, most existing event-based SLAM frameworks still assume static scenes and lack approaches to estimate the reliability of features. To this end, we propose PLED-VINS, a monocular event camera-based visual-inertial SLAM framework that enables robust state estimation in dynamic environments. We propose an entropy-recency score map to characterize the temporal reliability of both point and line features based on event temporal statistics. Concurrently, geometric reliability is estimated via a unified point-line robust bundle adjustment. Building upon these, we design an adaptive weighting strategy that fuses temporal and geometric reliability, including motion-conditioned reliability modeling for line features, to suppress unreliable observations. Experimental results demonstrate that PLED-VINS improves state estimation on the evaluated dynamic sequences with moving objects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07374 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Our algorithm, PLED-VINS, in dynamic envi￾ronments. (a) Weighted line features and estimated tra￾jectory on parking lot high sequence of VIODE dataset [8]. (b) Weighted point features and event streams on zurich city 01 e sequence of DSEC dataset [9]. Green and red indicate high and low feature weights, respectively. In this context, we propose PLED-VINS, a robust monocu￾lar event camera-based visual-inertial SLAM f… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The architecture of the proposed PLED-VINS. The system takes monocular images, IMU, and raw event data as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of IMU-based motion compensation. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Gradient alignment within the line band region. Mean [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: ATE comparison on the high sequences of VIODE dataset [8]. we used a TS decay of η = 20 ms, B = 8 temporal bins, α = 2.0 for recency weighting, and α0 = 0.4, τ = 0.2 for adaptive fusion. Trajectory accuracy was evaluated using absolute trajectory error (ATE, m) and mea…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Feature detection and weighting on the DAVIS 240C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    DynaSLAM: Tracking, mapping, and inpainting in dynamic scenes,

    B. Bescos, J. M. F ´acil, J. Civera, and J. Neira, “DynaSLAM: Tracking, mapping, and inpainting in dynamic scenes,”IEEE Robot. Automat. Lett., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 4076–4083, 2018

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    DS- SLAM: A semantic visual SLAM towards dynamic environments,

    C. Yu, Z. Liu, X. J. Liu, F. Xie, Y . Yang, Q. Wei, and Q. Fei, “DS- SLAM: A semantic visual SLAM towards dynamic environments,” in Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst., 2018, pp. 1168–1174

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    DynaVINS: A visual- inertial SLAM for dynamic environments,

    S. Song, H. Lim, A. J. Lee, and H. Myung, “DynaVINS: A visual- inertial SLAM for dynamic environments,”IEEE Robot. Automat. Lett., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 11 523–11 530, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    DRG-SLAM: A semantic RGB-D SLAM using geometric features for indoor dynamic scene,

    Y . Wang, K. Xu, Y . Tian, and X. Ding, “DRG-SLAM: A semantic RGB-D SLAM using geometric features for indoor dynamic scene,” inProc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst., 2022, pp. 1352–1359

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Dynam-SLAM: An accurate, robust stereo visual-inertial SLAM method in dynamic environments,

    H. Yin, S. Li, Y . Tao, J. Guo, and B. Huang, “Dynam-SLAM: An accurate, robust stereo visual-inertial SLAM method in dynamic environments,”IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 289–308, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    DynPL-SVO: A robust stereo visual odometry for dynamic scenes,

    B. Zhang, X. Ma, H. J. Ma, and C. Luo, “DynPL-SVO: A robust stereo visual odometry for dynamic scenes,”IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 73, pp. 1–10, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    E2-VINS: An event-enhanced visual-inertial SLAM scheme for dynamic environments,

    J. Huang, S. Zhao, and L. Zhang, “E2-VINS: An event-enhanced visual-inertial SLAM scheme for dynamic environments,”Appl. Sci., vol. 15, no. 3, p. 1314, 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    VIODE: A simulated dataset to address the challenges of visual-inertial odom- etry in dynamic environments,

    K. Minoda, F. Schilling, V . W¨uest, D. Floreano, and T. Yairi, “VIODE: A simulated dataset to address the challenges of visual-inertial odom- etry in dynamic environments,”IEEE Robot. Automat. Lett., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1343–1350, 2021

    work page 2021

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    DSEC: A stereo event camera dataset for driving scenarios,

    M. Gehrig, W. Aarents, D. Gehrig, and D. Scaramuzza, “DSEC: A stereo event camera dataset for driving scenarios,”IEEE Robot. Automat. Lett., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 4947–4954, 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    Event-based vision: A survey,

    G. Gallego, T. Delbr ¨uck, G. Orchard, C. Bartolozzi, B. Taba, A. Censi, S. Leutenegger, A. J. Davison, J. Conradt, K. Daniilidis, and D. Scara- muzza, “Event-based vision: A survey,”IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 154–180, 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    EVO: A geometric approach to event-based 6-DOF parallel tracking and mapping in real time,

    H. Rebecq, T. Horstsch ¨afer, G. Gallego, and D. Scaramuzza, “EVO: A geometric approach to event-based 6-DOF parallel tracking and mapping in real time,”IEEE Robot. Automat. Lett., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 593–600, 2017

    2017

  4. [12]

    Ultimate SLAM? Combining Events, Images, and IMU for Robust Visual SLAM in HDR and High-Speed Scenarios,

    A. R. Vidal, H. Rebecq, T. Horstsch ¨afer, and D. Scaramuzza, “Ultimate SLAM? Combining Events, Images, and IMU for Robust Visual SLAM in HDR and High-Speed Scenarios,”IEEE Robot. Automat. Lett., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 994–1001, 2018

    2018

  5. [13]

    PL-EVIO: Robust monocular event-based visual inertial odometry with point and line features,

    W. Guan, P. Chen, Y . Xie, and P. Lu, “PL-EVIO: Robust monocular event-based visual inertial odometry with point and line features,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 6277–6293, 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    ESVIO: Event-based stereo visual inertial odometry,

    P. Chen, W. Guan, and P. Lu, “ESVIO: Event-based stereo visual inertial odometry,”IEEE Robot. Automat. Lett., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 3661– 3668, 2023

    2023

  7. [15]

    Monocular event-inertial odometry with adaptive decay-based time surface and polarity-aware tracking,

    K. Tang, X. Lang, Y . Ma, Y . Huang, L. Li, Y . Liu, and J. Lv, “Monocular event-inertial odometry with adaptive decay-based time surface and polarity-aware tracking,” inProc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst., 2024, pp. 12 544–12 551

    2024

  8. [16]

    Event-based motion segmentation by motion compensation,

    T. Stoffregen, G. Gallego, T. Drummond, L. Kleeman, and D. Scara- muzza, “Event-based motion segmentation by motion compensation,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., 2019, pp. 7244–7253

    2019

  9. [17]

    Event-based motion segmentation with spatio-temporal graph cuts,

    Y . Zhou, G. Gallego, X. Lu, S. Liu, and S. Shen, “Event-based motion segmentation with spatio-temporal graph cuts,”IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 4868–4880, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Event-based real-time moving object detection based on IMU ego-motion compensation,

    C. Zhao, Y . Li, and Y . Lyu, “Event-based real-time moving object detection based on IMU ego-motion compensation,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Automat., 2023, pp. 690–696

    2023

  11. [19]

    Event-based visual flow,

    R. Benosman, C. Clercq, X. Lagorce, S.-H. Ieng, and C. Bartolozzi, “Event-based visual flow,”IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 407–417, 2013

    2013

  12. [20]

    HOTS: A hierarchy of event-based time-surfaces for pattern recog- nition,

    X. Lagorce, G. Orchard, F. Galluppi, B. E. Shi, and R. B. Benosman, “HOTS: A hierarchy of event-based time-surfaces for pattern recog- nition,”IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1346–1359, 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    Fast event-based harris corner detection exploiting the advantages of event-driven cameras,

    V . Vasco, A. Glover, and C. Bartolozzi, “Fast event-based harris corner detection exploiting the advantages of event-driven cameras,” inProc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst., 2016, pp. 4144–4149

    2016

  14. [22]

    Asynchronous corner detection and track- ing for event cameras in real-time,

    I. Alzugaray and M. Chli, “Asynchronous corner detection and track- ing for event cameras in real-time,”IEEE Robot. Automat. Lett., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 3177–3184, 2018

    2018

  15. [23]

    LSD: A fast line segment detector with a false detection control,

    R. Grompone von Gioi, J. Jakubowicz, J.-M. Morel, and G. Randall, “LSD: A fast line segment detector with a false detection control,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 722–732, 2010

    2010

  16. [24]

    eCDT: Event clustering for simultaneous feature detection and tracking,

    S. Hu, Y . Kim, H. Lim, A. J. Lee, and H. Myung, “eCDT: Event clustering for simultaneous feature detection and tracking,” inProc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst., 2022, pp. 3808–3815

    2022

  17. [25]

    Event-frame-inertial odometry using point and line features based on coarse-to-fine motion compensation,

    B. Choi, H. Lee, and C. G. Park, “Event-frame-inertial odometry using point and line features based on coarse-to-fine motion compensation,” IEEE Robot. Automat. Lett., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 2622–2629, 2025

    2025

  18. [26]

    DynaVINS++: Robust visual-inertial state estimator in dynamic environments by adaptive truncated least squares and stable state recovery,

    S. Song, H. Lim, A. J. Lee, and H. Myung, “DynaVINS++: Robust visual-inertial state estimator in dynamic environments by adaptive truncated least squares and stable state recovery,”IEEE Robot. Au- tomat. Lett., vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 9127–9134, 2024

    2024

  19. [27]

    VINS-Dimc: A visual-inertial navigation system for dynamic environment integrating multiple con- straints,

    D. Fu, H. Xia, Y . Liu, and Y . Qiao, “VINS-Dimc: A visual-inertial navigation system for dynamic environment integrating multiple con- straints,”ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 95, 2022

    2022

  20. [28]

    On-manifold preintegration for real-time visual–inertial odometry,

    C. Forster, L. Carlone, F. Dellaert, and D. Scaramuzza, “On-manifold preintegration for real-time visual–inertial odometry,”IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2016

    2016

  21. [29]

    Good features to track,

    J. Shiet al., “Good features to track,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 1994, pp. 593–600

    1994

  22. [30]

    An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision,

    B. D. Lucas and T. Kanade, “An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision,” inProc. Int. Joint Conf. on Artif. Intell., 1981, pp. 674–679

    1981

  23. [31]

    An efficient and robust line segment matching approach based on LBD descriptor and pairwise geometric consis- tency,

    L. Zhang and R. Koch, “An efficient and robust line segment matching approach based on LBD descriptor and pairwise geometric consis- tency,”J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent., vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 794–805, 2013

    2013

  24. [32]

    A mathmatical theory of communication,

    C. E. Shannon, “A mathmatical theory of communication,”The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 370–423, 1948

    1948

  25. [33]

    T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas,Elements of Information Theory. John Wiley & Sons, 1999

    1999

  26. [34]

    PL- VINS: Real-time monocular visual-inertial SLAM with point and line features,

    Q. Fu, J. Wang, H. Yu, I. Ali, F. Guo, Y . He, and H. Zhang, “PL- VINS: Real-time monocular visual-inertial SLAM with point and line features,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.07462, 2020

    2009 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Least-squares estimation of transformation parameters between two point patterns,

    S. Umeyama, “Least-squares estimation of transformation parameters between two point patterns,”IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 376–380, 1991

    1991

  28. [36]

    v2e: From video frames to realistic DVS events,

    Y . Hu, S.-C. Liu, and T. Delbruck, “v2e: From video frames to realistic DVS events,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 2021, pp. 1312–1321

    2021

  29. [37]

    The event-camera dataset and simulator: Event-based data for pose estimation, visual odometry, and SLAM,

    E. Mueggler, H. Rebecq, G. Gallego, T. Delbruck, and D. Scaramuzza, “The event-camera dataset and simulator: Event-based data for pose estimation, visual odometry, and SLAM,”Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 142–149, 2017

    2017

  30. [38]

    Fast-LIO: A fast, robust LiDAR-inertial odometry package by tightly-coupled iterated Kalman filter,

    W. Xu and F. Zhang, “Fast-LIO: A fast, robust LiDAR-inertial odometry package by tightly-coupled iterated Kalman filter,”IEEE Robot. Automat. Lett., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 3317–3324, 2021

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed July 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.