Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 105 references

A single discrete lattice model unifies weak- and strong-coupling multichannel Kondo physics and can be Monte-Carlo simulated without critical slowing down.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 17:49 UTC pith:SN5NM23T

load-bearing objection Solid methods paper that unifies weak- and strong-tunneling multichannel Kondo in one simulable discrete model with z≃0 cluster MC; the ST formal control is soft but the numerics and benchmarks hold. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.07797 v1 pith:SN5NM23T submitted 2026-07-08 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el

Monte-Carlo solution of the Kondo model

classification cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el
keywords multichannel Kondo modelcharge Kondocluster Monte Carlosolid-on-solid modelquantum impurityuniversal crossoverquantum Brownian motionLuttinger liquid
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that one discrete solid-on-solid lattice model (NKSOS) exactly reproduces the multichannel Kondo problem and its charge-Kondo cousins. With cluster Monte Carlo algorithms adapted to long-range interactions, the model can be simulated at very large sizes with no critical slowing down, so the full universal crossover functions for conductance and transport become accessible from high to low energy. The same action covers both the historically separate weak-tunneling and strong-tunneling regimes, showing they share a common origin. Because the construction works for many channels, channel asymmetry, anisotropy, and interacting leads, it supplies concrete transport predictions for charge-Kondo devices that existing numerical methods cannot reach.

Core claim

The N-channel Kondo solid-on-solid (NKSOS) model is exactly equivalent to the multichannel Kondo Hamiltonian (and to the charge-Kondo and quantum-Brownian-motion formulations) and, when simulated with long-range cluster Monte Carlo, yields the universal energy crossovers connecting the weak-tunneling, strong-tunneling and nontrivial multichannel fixed points within a single framework.

What carries the argument

The NKSOS action: a long-range solid-on-solid model on a hyperhoneycomb lattice whose configurations (n, σ) encode the instanton/Coulomb-gas expansion of the bosonized Kondo problem; cluster updates built from lattice involutions remove critical slowing down.

Load-bearing premise

The discrete lattice action, derived under controlled expansions that assume large tunneling or charging energy, still captures the full continuum Kondo crossovers even deep in the strong-tunneling regime where those expansions are no longer formally justified.

What would settle it

A high-precision comparison of the NKSOS zero-frequency conductance and the full universal crossover curve against an independent exact or high-accuracy method (Bethe-Ansatz, conformal-field-theory result, or large-scale NRG) for N=3 or N=4 at intermediate anisotropy, especially on the strong-tunneling side of the fixed point.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Universal conductance curves for the three-channel Kondo model can be obtained continuously from both weak- and strong-tunneling sides, including the divergence of the crossover temperature.
  • Fixed-point conductances and crossovers become computable for more than ten channels, far beyond the practical reach of NRG or FRG.
  • Interacting leads (Luttinger parameter K eq 1) and channel asymmetry map onto the same lattice model, giving direct predictions for existing charge-Kondo circuits.
  • The RG flow diagram in the (J, G) plane shows that weak-tunneling-to-NCK crossovers form a continuous family parametrized by anisotropy rather than a single universal curve.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same lattice construction could be used as a numerically exact benchmark for functional RG or other approximate methods that currently struggle at intermediate frequencies.
  • Because the algorithm scales only logarithmically with system size, real-time or finite-bias transport extensions of the NKSOS model become feasible for multi-terminal charge-Kondo devices.
  • The explicit mapping of large-N Kondo physics onto decoupled boundary sine-Gordon models supplies a controlled starting point for studying the Schmid transition in multi-channel geometries.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the N-channel Kondo solid-on-solid (NKSOS) model—a discrete imaginary-time lattice model with fields (n, σ) on a hyperhoneycomb lattice—and shows that its Coulomb-gas/instanton expansion matches the bosonized multichannel Kondo (NCK) model and the charge-Kondo/quantum-Brownian-motion formulations, with explicit parameter maps for anisotropy J, jump cost r (or r_a), and Luttinger parameter K. Using long-range cluster Monte Carlo that eliminates critical slowing down, the authors compute universal conductance crossovers G(iω/T*), RG flows in the (J, G) plane, fixed-point conductances up to N=10, intermediate fixed points for K≠1, and channel-asymmetry flows between 1CK/2CK/3CK fixed points, with direct application to charge-Kondo transport.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a substantial advance: a single, efficiently simulable discrete model unifies the weak-tunneling (Anderson–Yuval/Kondo) and strong-tunneling (charge-Kondo) descriptions that have historically been treated by complementary methods (NRG vs FRG, Bethe Ansatz/CFT fixed points). The complete removal of critical slowing down (z≃0) enables large system sizes, N≳10, anisotropy, interacting leads, and channel asymmetry—regimes that are costly or inaccessible to NRG/FRG—while recovering independent external benchmarks (Emery–Kivelson 2CK curve, G*_NCK=2sin²(π/(N+2)), 3CK G* and T* divergence, FRG ST curves, BKT location Jc). The framework yields concrete, falsifiable predictions for multichannel charge-Kondo devices and is therefore of immediate experimental relevance.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; main text “Link to the Kondo problem” and “Anisotropic multi-channel Kondo model”; SM Sec. II B] The formal derivations (bosonization + Coulomb gas for NCK; instanton expansion of the QBM for charge Kondo) are controlled in the large-r or large-EC regimes (SM Sec. II A–B). The central claim that the same discrete NKSOS action also captures the full strong-tunneling (quasi-ballistic) to NCK crossover therefore rests on membership in the same universality class plus numerical agreement with FRG and exact fixed-point values, not on a controlled expansion deep in ST. This is the standard justification for Anderson–Yuval-type constructions and is well supported by the independent anchors in the paper (Emery–Kivelson, G*_NCK to ~1%, BKT Jc, FRG ST curves). The main text and abstract should state this distinction more explicitly so that “exactly reproduces” is not read as a controlled continuum expansion in the ST regime.
  2. [Main text “Kondo effect in interacting leads”; Fig. 3; SM Sec. IV B and Fig. S8] For N≥5 and K near/above N/(N−1), the manuscript reports intermediate fixed points and endorses a first-order jump, while noting that results near K≃5/4 are “not quantitatively reliable” because of a marginal operator and strong finite-size effects (Fig. 3 right; SM Sec. IV B). The qualitative endorsement of the reentrant/unstable line and discontinuous jump is load-bearing for the interacting-leads phase diagram. A clearer statement of which features are robust under the multi-histogram + T→0 extrapolation (and which remain qualitative) would strengthen the claim; additional larger-β data or a controlled finite-size scaling ansatz near the marginal point would help.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Main text after Eq. (6)] T* is defined operationally as the frequency where G lies halfway between high- and low-frequency limits. This is fine for data collapse, but a one-sentence remark that the universal function G(iω/T*) is independent of this convention (up to a multiplicative redefinition of T*) would avoid confusion with other common definitions (e.g., half-width or RG matching).
  2. [Fig. 2(c); SM Sec. IV A] Fig. 2(c) and the associated RG-flow construction pair lattice times j=1,2,4,… with frequencies ω_j=π/j. A brief note in the caption or SM that this is a discrete proxy for the continuous RG scale (and that J(j)=J⟨σ_i σ_{i+j}⟩) would make the figure self-contained.
  3. [Figs. 2–4 captions] In the main text, G is given in units of e²K/h; the SM uses the same convention. Stating the units once in the caption of Fig. 2 (and Fig. 3) would help experimental readers.
  4. [Introduction; Fig. 2–3 captions] Typographical/consistency: “Kondophysics”, “acconsequence”, “Thischallengehasbecomeparticularlytimely” and similar run-together words appear in the Introduction (likely PDF extraction artifacts, but should be checked in the source). Also “y-tick G*” in Fig. 2 caption and “N=/gid00726” in Fig. 3 left look like rendering glitches.
  5. [Main text “Kondo Solid-on-solid model”; SM Sec. III D] The performance comparison (SM Fig. S5) is valuable; a short sentence in the main text quantifying the speedup (e.g., orders of magnitude at β~10^4) would better advertise the algorithmic advance without requiring the reader to open the SM.
  6. [Main text “Nonequivalent channels”; SM Sec. III] For nonequivalent channels the cluster algorithm is replaced by a Metropolis scheme with z≃1 (SM Sec. III). Mentioning this limitation briefly when discussing Fig. 4 would set expectations for future asymmetric multi-channel runs.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: NKSOS–Kondo mappings and universal crossovers are independently derived and externally benchmarked; minor self-citation to authors’ FRG is comparative only.

full rationale

The derivation chain (bosonization + Coulomb-gas of NCK matching instanton expansion of NKSOS; QBM instanton analysis of charge-Kondo yielding the same discrete action) is self-contained in the Supplemental Material and equates partition functions/expansions under stated UV cutoffs, without defining one model in terms of the target observable. Universal curves and fixed-point values (Emery–Kivelson 2CK, G*_NCK = 2 sin^{2}(π/(N+2)), BKT location Jc, T* divergence exponent) are recovered from Monte-Carlo sampling of the discrete action and compared to independent exact/CFT/Bethe-Ansatz/FRG results; T* is only an operational halfway scale for collapse, not a fitted definition of the curves. Self-citations (e.g. authors’ FRG [42]) appear solely as external benchmarks for the ST regime and are not load-bearing for the mapping or the claim of shared universality class. No fitted-input-as-prediction, uniqueness-from-self, or ansatz-smuggling steps exist. The soft spot (formal control of the mapping only at large r/EC, with ST supported by numerics + universality) is a validity assumption, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard bosonization and Coulomb-gas/instanton technology plus the assertion that the discrete long-range SOS action shares the full Kondo universality class even outside the formally controlled instanton regime. Free parameters are physical couplings of the model, not post-hoc fits to invent the fixed points. The NKSOS configuration space is an invented discrete entity but is derived as the lattice of minima of known QBM/Kondo actions.

free parameters (4)
  • microscopic jump cost r (or channel-dependent r_a)
    Controls the bare tunneling/instanton fugacity; T* is defined from the resulting G(iω) curves. Not fitted to force fixed-point values, but chosen to scan regimes.
  • anisotropy J
    Linked to λ_z; scanned between Toulouse (J=0) and planar (J=1/(2N)). Used as a physical axis of the RG flow, not a free fit to data.
  • Luttinger parameter K
    Equals 1 for ordinary Kondo; varied for interacting leads. Intermediate G*(K) is extrapolated from finite-β MC, not assumed.
  • operational T* definition (halfway G between high- and low-frequency limits)
    Used only for data collapse of universal curves; does not set the infrared fixed-point conductance values.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Bosonization of chiral fermions and integration of bulk modes yields the boundary action used for NCK and charge Kondo.
    Standard in 1D impurity literature; invoked in Supplemental Sec. II A–B.
  • domain assumption Coulomb-gas expansion of the bosonized NCK equals the instanton expansion of NKSOS with the stated map of (J,r,K).
    Core equivalence proof in Supplemental Sec. II A; relies on alternating spin flips and zero-mode constraints.
  • domain assumption Instanton expansion of the QBM / charge-Kondo action at large EC, r̃ maps onto NKSOS for all J interpolating Toulouse to planar.
    Supplemental Sec. II B; formally controlled only at large EC and r̃.
  • standard math Cluster updates with involutions R_M̃^a satisfy detailed balance and irreducibility for the long-range NKSOS action.
    Standard Wolff/Swendsen–Wang logic plus long-range complexity reduction (Fukui–Todo / Clock MC); Supplemental Sec. III.
  • domain assumption Universal low-energy physics of continuum Kondo is captured by NKSOS for frequencies and temperatures far below the UV cutoff (lattice spacing = 1).
    Stated as the reason NKSOS can replace continuum models for crossovers; load-bearing for ST claims.
invented entities (1)
  • N-channel Kondo solid-on-solid (NKSOS) model with fields (n,σ) on a hyperhoneycomb lattice independent evidence
    purpose: Provide a single discrete action whose Monte Carlo simulation yields multichannel Kondo universal crossovers and transport in both weak and strong coupling.
    New discrete formulation extending Anderson–Yuval; derived as lattice of minima / Coulomb-gas dual of known continuum models, so not an unmoored particle, but still a new computational entity.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 35972 in / 3514 out tokens · 87922 ms · 2026-07-10T17:49:03.647527+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The Kondo model is a paradigmatic quantum impurity problem realized in a wide variety of experimental platforms and central to the study of strongly correlated electrons. We introduce a discrete model that exactly reproduces the multichannel Kondo model and demonstrate that it can be simulated efficiently. Using cluster Monte Carlo algorithms, we completely eliminate critical slowing down, providing direct access to universal crossover functions and transport properties across a broad range of parameters. Remarkably, the same model captures both the weak- and strong-coupling regimes, unifying descriptions traditionally derived in complementary limits and revealing their common origin. Our method naturally accommodates large channel numbers, anisotropy, interacting one-dimensional leads, and channel asymmetry, yielding predictions for transport properties in charge-Kondo devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07797 by Christophe Mora, Nicolas Paris, Oscar Bouverot-Dupuis.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Configuration space of the fields [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) In blue, conductance of the 2CK model for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Left: Conductance as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    ForN= 1, the fieldndisappears

    for details). ForN= 1, the fieldndisappears. Equations (1) and (2) yield a long-range Ising model which is exactly the Anderson-Yuval approach to theN= 1Kondo model [50–53] and which has been studied extensively numerically in Refs. [57, 60]. Link to the Kondo problem —The NKSOS model can be derived directly from theN-channel anisotropic Kondo Hamiltonian...

  2. [2]

    In practice, we defineT∗ such thatG(iω=T ∗)lies halfway between its high- and low-frequency limits

    as a function ofiω/T∗, G(iω) = |ω|≪1 G iω T ∗ ,(6) whereT ∗ is ar-dependent scale andGa universal func- tion. In practice, we defineT∗ such thatG(iω=T ∗)lies halfway between its high- and low-frequency limits. Anisotropic multi-channel Kondo model —In the two-channel Kondo model (2CK) atJ= 0, the conduc- tance behaves asG(0) = 1andG(+∞) = 0, and the Emery...

  3. [3]

    AsN→ ∞, this constraint gets distributed over 2CK (r1>r2/3) 1CK (r1<r2/3) 3CK (r1=r2/3) 0 1 G⊥ 0 1G∥ 3CK 1CK 2CK FIG. 4. Left: schematic interpretation of the 1CK, 2CK and 3CK fixed points in the 3KSOS model. Right: 3KSOS RG flow towards the 1CK, 2CK and 3CK fixed points. The lon- gitudinal conductanceG ∥(iω)is plotted as a function of the transverse cond...

  4. [4]

    4, following the procedure used in Fig

    In Fig. 4, following the procedure used in Fig. 2(c), we plot the parametric curves(G⊥(iω), G∥(iω))for sev- eral microscopic conditions. Reading these curves from high to low frequencies reveals the RG flow connecting the 1CK, 2CK and 3CK fixed points similarly to the ex- perimental findings of Ref. [43]. Conclusion —We have introduced a discrete model th...

  5. [5]

    A. C. Hewson,The Kondo problem to heavy fermions, Vol. 10031 (1993) p. 1

  6. [6]

    Fermi-liquid

    P. Nozieres, A “Fermi-liquid” description of the Kondo problem at low temperatures, Journal of low température physics17, 31 (1974)

  7. [7]

    C. Han, Z. Iftikhar, Y. Kleeorin, A. Anthore, F. Pierre, Y. Meir, A. K. Mitchell, and E. Sela, Fractional Entropy of Multichannel Kondo Systems from Conductance- Charge Relations, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 146803 (2022)

  8. [8]

    P. L. S. Lopes, I. Affleck, and E. Sela, Anyons in mul- tichannel Kondo systems, Phys. Rev. B101, 085141 (2020)

  9. [9]

    Komijani, Isolating Kondo anyons for topological quantum computation, Phys

    Y. Komijani, Isolating Kondo anyons for topological quantum computation, Phys. Rev. B101, 235131 (2020)

  10. [10]

    Lotem, E

    M. Lotem, E. Sela, and M. Goldstein, Manipulating Non- Abelian Anyons in a Chiral Multichannel Kondo Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 227703 (2022)

  11. [11]

    Gabay, C

    D. Gabay, C. Han, P. L. S. Lopes, I. Affleck, and E. Sela, Multi-impurity chiral Kondo model: Correlation func- tions and anyon fusion rules, Phys. Rev. B105, 035151 (2022)

  12. [12]

    Gaines, G

    J. Gaines, G. Li, and J. I. Väyrynen, Spin-Chain Mul- tichannel Kondo Model via Image Impurity Boundary Condition, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 036503 (2026)

  13. [13]

    Coherent manipulation of Kondo Majoranas in two-channel Kondo setups

    Y. Komijani and C. J. Bolech, Coherent manipulation of Kondo Majoranas in two-channel Kondo setups (2026), arXiv:2606.10259 [cond-mat.str-el]

  14. [14]

    Goldhaber-Gordon, H

    D. Goldhaber-Gordon, H. Shtrikman, D. Mahalu, D. Abusch-Magder, U. Meirav, and M. Kastner, Kondo effect in a single-electron transistor, Nature391, 156 (1998)

  15. [15]

    Goldhaber-Gordon, J

    D. Goldhaber-Gordon, J. Göres, M. A. Kastner, H. Shtrikman, D. Mahalu, and U. Meirav, From the Kondo Regime to the Mixed-Valence Regime in a Single- Electron Transistor, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 5225 (1998)

  16. [16]

    S. M. Cronenwett, T. H. Oosterkamp, and L. P. Kouwen- hoven, A Tunable Kondo Effect in Quantum Dots, Sci- ence281, 540 (1998)

  17. [17]

    Nygård, D

    J. Nygård, D. H. Cobden, and P. E. Lindelof, Kondo physics in carbon nanotubes, Nature408, 342 (2000)

  18. [18]

    Sasaki, S

    S. Sasaki, S. Amaha, N. Asakawa, M. Eto, and S. Tarucha, Enhanced Kondo Effect via Tuned Orbital Degeneracy in a Spin1/2Artificial Atom, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 017205 (2004)

  19. [19]

    Y. Ji, M. Heiblum, D. Sprinzak, D. Mahalu, and H. Shtrikman, Phase Evolution in a Kondo-Correlated System, Science290, 779 (2000)

  20. [20]

    W. G. van der Wiel, S. D. Franceschi, T. Fujisawa, J. M. Elzerman, S. Tarucha, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, TheKondoEffectintheUnitaryLimit,Science289,2105 (2000)

  21. [21]

    Sasaki, S

    S. Sasaki, S. De Franceschi, J. Elzerman, W. Van der Wiel, M. Eto, S. Tarucha, and L. Kouwenhoven, Kondo effect in an integer-spin quantum dot, Nature405, 764 (2000)

  22. [22]

    Simmel, R

    F. Simmel, R. H. Blick, J. P. Kotthaus, W. Wegscheider, and M. Bichler, Anomalous Kondo Effect in a Quantum Dot at Nonzero Bias, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 804 (1999)

  23. [23]

    Liang, M

    W. Liang, M. P. Shores, M. Bockrath, J. R. Long, and H. Park, Kondo resonance in a single-molecule transistor, Nature417, 725 (2002)

  24. [24]

    J. Park, A. N. Pasupathy, J. I. Goldsmith, C. Chang, Y. Yaish, J. R. Petta, M. Rinkoski, J. P. Sethna, H. D. Abruña, P. L. McEuen,et al., Coulomb blockade and the Kondo effect in single-atom transistors, Nature417, 722 (2002)

  25. [25]

    Jeong, A

    H. Jeong, A. M. Chang, and M. R. Melloch, The Kondo Effect in an Artificial Quantum Dot Molecule, Science 293, 2221 (2001)

  26. [26]

    N. J. Craig, J. M. Taylor, E. A. Lester, C. M. Marcus, M. P. Hanson, and A. C. Gossard, Tunable Nonlocal Spin ControlinaCoupled-QuantumDotSystem,Science304, 565 (2004)

  27. [27]

    Potok, I

    R. Potok, I. Rau, H. Shtrikman, Y. Oreg, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Observation of the two-channel Kondo effect, Nature446, 167 (2007)

  28. [28]

    S. J. Chorley, M. R. Galpin, F. W. Jayatilaka, C. G. Smith, D. E. Logan, and M. R. Buitelaar, Tunable Kondo Physics in a Carbon Nanotube Double Quantum Dot, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 156804 (2012). 6

  29. [29]

    Keller, L

    A. Keller, L. Peeters, C. Moca, I. Weymann, D. Mahalu, V. Umansky, G. Zaránd, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Uni- versal Fermi liquid crossover and quantum criticality in a mesoscopic system, Nature526, 237 (2015)

  30. [30]

    Madhavan, W

    V. Madhavan, W. Chen, T. Jamneala, M. F. Crommie, and N. S. Wingreen, Tunneling into a Single Magnetic Atom: Spectroscopic Evidence of the Kondo Resonance, Science280, 567 (1998)

  31. [31]

    Li, W.-D

    J. Li, W.-D. Schneider, R. Berndt, and B. Delley, Kondo ScatteringObservedataSingleMagneticImpurity,Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 2893 (1998)

  32. [32]

    A. Zhao, Q. Li, L. Chen, H. Xiang, W. Wang, S. Pan, B. Wang, X. Xiao, J. Yang, J. G. Hou, and Q. Zhu, Controlling the Kondo Effect of an Adsorbed Magnetic Ion Through Its Chemical Bonding, Science309, 1542 (2005)

  33. [33]

    Zhang, S

    Y.-h. Zhang, S. Kahle, T. Herden, C. Stroh, M. Mayor, U. Schlickum, M. Ternes, P. Wahl, and K. Kern, Temper- ature and magnetic field dependence of a Kondo system in the weak coupling regime, Nature communications4, 2110 (2013)

  34. [34]

    Bork, Y.-h

    J. Bork, Y.-h. Zhang, L. Diekhöner, L. Borda, P. Simon, J. Kroha, P. Wahl, and K. Kern, A tunable two-impurity Kondosystem in an atomic point contact, Nature Physics 7, 901 (2011)

  35. [35]

    Trishin, C

    S. Trishin, C. Lotze, F. Lohss, G. Franceschi, L. I. Glazman, F. von Oppen, and K. J. Franke, Tuning a Two-Impurity Kondo System by a Moiré Superstructure, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 176201 (2023)

  36. [36]

    Probing the spin polarization of an Anderson impurity

    M. Bagchi, T. Y. Tounsi, A. Safeer, C. van Efferen, A. Rosch, T. Michely, W. Jolie, T. A. Costi, and J. Fis- cher, Probing the spin polarization of an Anderson im- purity, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.14667 (2024)

  37. [37]

    A.Matveev, Quantum fluctuations of the charge of a metal particle under the Coulomb blockade conditions, Sov

    K. A.Matveev, Quantum fluctuations of the charge of a metal particle under the Coulomb blockade conditions, Sov. Phys. JETP72, 892 (1991)

  38. [38]

    K. A. Matveev, Coulomb blockade at almost perfect transmission, Phys. Rev. B51, 1743 (1995)

  39. [39]

    Furusaki and K

    A. Furusaki and K. A. Matveev, Theory of strong inelas- tic cotunneling, Phys. Rev. B52, 16676 (1995)

  40. [40]

    Andrei and C

    N. Andrei and C. Destri, Solution of the Multichannel Kondo Problem, Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 364 (1984)

  41. [41]

    Tsvelick and P

    A. Tsvelick and P. Wiegmann, Exact solution of the mul- tichannel kondo problem, scaling, and integrability, Jour- nal of Statistical Physics38, 125 (1985)

  42. [42]

    Kattel, A

    P. Kattel, A. Zhakenov, and N. Andrei, Multichannel Kondo effect in one-dimensional superconducting leads, Phys. Rev. B113, 165130 (2026)

  43. [43]

    K. G. Wilson, The renormalization group: Critical phe- nomena and the Kondo problem, Rev. Mod. Phys.47, 773 (1975)

  44. [44]

    Bulla, T

    R. Bulla, T. A. Costi, and T. Pruschke, Numerical renor- malization group method for quantum impurity systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 395 (2008)

  45. [45]

    A. K. Mitchell, M. R. Galpin, S. Wilson-Fletcher, D. E. Logan, and R. Bulla, Generalized Wilson chain for solv- ingmultichannelquantumimpurityproblems,Phys.Rev. B89, 121105 (2014)

  46. [46]

    Paris, N

    N. Paris, N. Dupuis, and C. Mora, Universal Crossover in the Three-Channel Charge Kondo Model at High Trans- parency, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 066501 (2026)

  47. [47]

    Iftikhar, S

    Z. Iftikhar, S. Jezouin, A. Anthore, U. Gennser, F. Par- mentier, A. Cavanna, and F. Pierre, Two-channel Kondo effect and renormalization flow with macroscopic quan- tum charge states, Nature526, 233 (2015)

  48. [48]

    Iftikhar, A

    Z. Iftikhar, A. Anthore, A. K. Mitchell, F. D. Parmentier, U. Gennser, A. Ouerghi, A. Cavanna, C. Mora, P. Simon, and F. Pierre, Tunable quantum criticality and super- ballistic transport in a “charge” Kondo circuit, Science 360, 1315 (2018)

  49. [49]

    Piquard, P

    C. Piquard, P. Glidic, C. Han, A. Aassime, A. Cavanna, U. Gennser, Y. Meir, E. Sela, A. Anthore, and F. Pierre, Observing the universal screening of a Kondo impurity, Nature Communications14, 7263 (2023)

  50. [50]

    Experimental Evidence of Fractional Entropy in Critical Kondo Systems

    C. Piquard, A. Veillon, Y. Sato, F. Zanichelli, A. Aas- sime, A. Cavanna, U. Gennser, A. K. Mitchell, A. An- thore, and F. Pierre, Experimental Evidence of Frac- tional Entropy in Critical Kondo Systems (2026), arXiv:2605.00669 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

  51. [51]

    Pouse, L

    W. Pouse, L. Peeters, C. L. Hsueh, U. Gennser, A. Ca- vanna, M. A. Kastner, A. K. Mitchell, and D. Goldhaber- Gordon, Quantum simulation of an exotic quantum crit- ical point in a two-site charge Kondo circuit, Nature Physics19, 492 (2023)

  52. [52]

    A. K. Mitchell, L. A. Landau, L. Fritz, and E. Sela, Uni- versality and Scaling in a Charge Two-Channel Kondo Device, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 157202 (2016)

  53. [53]

    D. B. Karki, E. Boulat, W. Pouse, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, A. K. Mitchell, and C. Mora,Z3 Parafermion in the Dou- ble Charge Kondo Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 146201 (2023)

  54. [54]

    P. W. Anderson and G. Yuval, Exact Results in the Kondo Problem: Equivalence to a Classical One- Dimensional Coulomb Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.23, 89 (1969)

  55. [55]

    Yuval and P

    G. Yuval and P. W. Anderson, Exact Results for the Kondo Problem: One-Body Theory and Extension to Fi- nite Temperature, Phys. Rev. B1, 1522 (1970)

  56. [56]

    P. W. Anderson, G. Yuval, and D. R. Hamann, Exact Re- sults in the Kondo Problem. II. Scaling Theory, Qualita- tively Correct Solution, and Some New Results on One- Dimensional Classical Statistical Models, Phys. Rev. B 1, 4464 (1970)

  57. [57]

    P. W. Anderson and G. Yuval, Some numerical results on the Kondo problem and the inverse square one- dimensional Ising model, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics4, 607 (1971)

  58. [58]

    R. H. Swendsen and J.-S. Wang, Nonuniversal critical dynamics in Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 86 (1987)

  59. [59]

    Wolff, Collective Monte Carlo Updating for Spin Sys- tems, Phys

    U. Wolff, Collective Monte Carlo Updating for Spin Sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 361 (1989)

  60. [60]

    Werner and M

    P. Werner and M. Troyer, Efficient Simulation of Resis- tively Shunted Josephson Junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 060201 (2005)

  61. [61]

    Fukui and S

    K. Fukui and S. Todo, Order-N Cluster Monte Carlo Method for Spin Systems with Long-range Interactions, Journal of Computational Physics228, 2629 (2009)

  62. [62]

    Michel, X

    M. Michel, X. Tan, and Y. Deng, Clock Monte Carlo methods, Phys. Rev. E99, 010105 (2019)

  63. [63]

    [34, 35, 44, 54–58, 60– 65, 69, 77–83], for more details

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher], which includes Refs. [34, 35, 44, 54–58, 60– 65, 69, 77–83], for more details

  64. [64]

    Luijten and H

    E. Luijten and H. Meßingfeld, Criticality in One Dimen- sionwithInverseSquare-LawPotentials,Phys.Rev.Lett. 86, 5305 (2001)

  65. [65]

    A. V. Parafilo, Manifestation of Luttinger liquid effects in a hybrid metal-semiconductor double-quantum dot de- 7 vice, Low Temperature Physics50, 1180 (2024)

  66. [66]

    Z.Ma, C.Han, F.Pierre,andE.Sela,Localizationtransi- tion in a charge-Kondo circuit, Phys. Rev. B113, 235402 (2026)

  67. [67]

    Yi and C

    H. Yi and C. L. Kane, Quantum Brownian motion in a periodic potential and the multichannel Kondo problem, Phys. Rev. B57, R5579 (1998)

  68. [68]

    Yi, Resonant tunneling and the multichannel Kondo problem: Quantum Brownian motion description, Phys

    H. Yi, Resonant tunneling and the multichannel Kondo problem: Quantum Brownian motion description, Phys. Rev. B65, 195101 (2002)

  69. [69]

    V. J. Emery and S. Kivelson, Mapping of the two-channel Kondo problem to a resonant-level model, Phys. Rev. B 46, 10812 (1992)

  70. [70]

    A. K. Mitchell, M. R. Galpin, S. Wilson-Fletcher, D. E. Logan, and R. Bulla, Generalized Wilson chain for solv- ingmultichannelquantumimpurityproblems,Phys.Rev. B89, 121105(R) (2014)

  71. [71]

    Quantum Hall Charge Kondo Criticality

    Z. qiang Bao and F. Zhang, Quantum Hall Charge Kondo Criticality (2017), arXiv:1708.09139 [cond-mat.str-el]

  72. [72]

    The exact value is recovered within1%accuracy with moderate computational effort: a two-day simulation on a single computer forN= 10

  73. [73]

    Anthore, Z

    A. Anthore, Z. Iftikhar, E. Boulat, F. D. Parmentier, A. Cavanna, A. Ouerghi, U. Gennser, and F. Pierre, Cir- cuit Quantum Simulation of a Tomonaga-Luttinger Liq- uid with an Impurity, Phys. Rev. X8, 031075 (2018)

  74. [74]

    A. V. Parafilo, T. K. T. Nguyen, and M. N. Kiselev, Thermoelectrics of a two-channel charge Kondo circuit: Role of electron-electron interactions in a quantum point contact, Phys. Rev. B105, L121405 (2022)

  75. [75]

    A. V. Parafilo, Multiterminal open quantum dot circuit operating in the fractional quantum Hall regime, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 023019 (2023)

  76. [76]

    T. K. T. Nguyen and M. N. Kiselev, Thermoelectric Transport in a Three-Channel Charge Kondo Circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 026801 (2020)

  77. [77]

    T. T. K. Nguyen and M. N. Kiselev, Quantum Transport Through a “Charge” Kondo Circuit: Effects of Weak Re- pulsive Interaction in Luttinger Liquid, Communications in Physics30, 1 (2020)

  78. [78]

    A. M. Ferrenberg and R. H. Swendsen, Optimized Monte Carlo data analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 1195 (1989)

  79. [79]

    Schmid, Diffusion and Localization in a Dissipative Quantum System, Phys

    A. Schmid, Diffusion and Localization in a Dissipative Quantum System, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 1506 (1983)

  80. [80]

    Bulgadaev, Phase diagram of a dissipative quantum system, JETP Lett.39, 264 (1984)

    S. Bulgadaev, Phase diagram of a dissipative quantum system, JETP Lett.39, 264 (1984)

Showing first 80 references.