Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 239 references

Ultra-long gamma-ray bursts and luminous fast blue optical transients can share a helium-core plus compact-object merger origin.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 17:26 UTC pith:BX2GMPBJ

load-bearing objection Solid application of the Metzger LFBOT model to SN 2011kl plus a clean host comparison; the shared-progenitor claim is modest and survives the afterglow debate. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.07819 v1 pith:BX2GMPBJ submitted 2026-07-08 astro-ph.HE

Compact Objects Merging with Stars as an Origin of Ultra-Long Gamma-Ray Bursts and Luminous Fast Blue Optical Transients

V. Ashley Villar , Anya E. Nugent , Eric Burns , Brian D. Metzger , Tarraneh Eftekhari , Jakub Klencki , Christopher L. Fryer This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords ultra-long gamma-ray burstsluminous fast blue optical transientshelium-core compact-object mergersengine-driven transientsSN 2011klhost galaxiescircumstellar medium
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Two rare engine-driven explosions—ultra-long gamma-ray bursts and luminous fast blue optical transients—have looked unrelated. This paper argues they can arise from the same channel: a massive helium star merging with a black hole or neutron star. The authors re-fit the optical light of SN 2011kl (the counterpart of the ultra-long GRB 111209A) with an analytical model built for the blue transients and find it matches the early rapid, luminous, blue rise. The longer plateau and stronger ultraviolet suppression imply more pre-merger mass loss than typical blue transients. Host galaxies of five ultra-long bursts also sit in the same low-mass, high-star-formation niche as the blue-transient and ordinary long-burst hosts. If the link holds, at least some ultra-long bursts are simply the on-axis, jet-successful end of the same mergers that produce the blue optical events.

Core claim

SN 2011kl is broadly consistent with an LFBOT-like origin under a helium-core plus compact-object merger model: it shows the rapid luminous blue early emission of LFBOTs, while its longer plateau and stronger UV suppression indicate an extended pre-merger mass-loss history. Host environments of five ULGRBs occupy the same low-mass, high-sSFR locus as LFBOT and classical long-GRB hosts, supporting a shared progenitor for at least a subset of the two classes.

What carries the argument

The analytical LFBOT model of Metzger (2022), in which optical light is powered by shock interaction of disrupted helium-star material with pre-merger circumstellar medium plus reprocessed accretion radiation; free parameters include WR mass, pre-runaway envelope mass, orbital number, slow and fast ejecta, UV-suppression index and temperature floor, plus an additive power-law afterglow for the GRB case.

Load-bearing premise

That once a simple afterglow is subtracted, the remaining optical light of SN 2011kl is faithfully described by the helium-star merger LFBOT model rather than residual afterglow or a different engine geometry.

What would settle it

A new well-sampled ultra-long GRB whose early multi-band optical light, after afterglow subtraction, cannot be fit by the same LFBOT merger parameters (or shows a clear radioactive 56Ni-powered nebular phase) would break the claimed connection.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Future ULGRBs should show LFBOT-like early optical peaks followed by luminous plateaus lasting tens of days.
  • A subset of LFBOTs should host off-axis ultra-relativistic jets detectable in late-time radio.
  • ULGRB hosts should display a broader metallicity range than classical long GRBs if lower-mass black-hole or neutron-star binaries dominate.
  • Late-time rest-frame optical spectra of ULGRB counterparts should show little newly formed 56Ni.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the plateau length tracks the number of pre-merger orbits, optical light-curve shape becomes a direct clock of common-envelope or runaway mass-transfer duration.
  • The low inferred WR mass for SN 2011kl suggests ULGRBs may preferentially come from the lower-mass end of the same binary channel that produces ordinary LFBOTs.
  • Volumetric rate comparisons already allow ULGRBs to be a beamed subset of the LFBOT population; continuous all-sky monitors will test that fraction directly.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper argues that ultra-long GRBs and LFBOTs can share a helium-core + compact-object merger origin. It re-fits the UV–NIR light curve of GRB 111209A/SN 2011kl with the Metzger (2022) analytical LFBOT model plus an additive power-law afterglow (Eq. 1), finding a rapid luminous blue early component consistent with LFBOTs but a longer ~2-week plateau and stronger UV suppression (γ_UV ≃ 8). An appendix explores an alternative SNLC two-component shock-heating model. Host SEDs of five ULGRBs are fit with Prospector (delayed-τ SFH) and compared to LFBOT, LGRB, and field samples; ULGRB hosts occupy the same low-mass (<10^10 M_⊙), high-sSFR locus. The abstract and §4 conclude that these results support a shared progenitor for at least a subset of the two classes.

Significance. If the light-curve identification holds, the work supplies a concrete, observationally testable link between two rare engine-driven populations and generates falsifiable predictions (LFBOT-like optical counterparts to future ULGRBs, off-axis radio jets in LFBOTs, delayed IR echoes, low 56Ni). Strengths include multi-band MCMC posteriors (Table 2), an independent host analysis with Prospector, an alternative shock-heating model (Appendix A), and explicit rate and multi-wavelength predictions in §4. The ULGRB sample remains small (N=5) and the afterglow decomposition is contested, so the shared-progenitor claim is suggestive rather than definitive, but the analysis is a useful step for the field.

major comments (3)
  1. §2.1–2.2, Eq. (1), Fig. 1: The claim that SN 2011kl is “broadly consistent with an LFBOT origin” rests on isolating a thermal excess that appears ~3 days post-merger after subtracting a separable power-law afterglow with no jet break. Greiner et al. (2015) and Kann et al. (2019) require a break near ~9 days to leave room for a SN-like component; Ioka et al. (2016) and Gompertz & Fruchter (2017) do not. With nine free LFBOT parameters plus AG α, β and m0,ref (Table 2), residual afterglow can be absorbed into the LFBOT component. A quantitative comparison that forces a jet-break model (or jointly fits X-ray constraints) is needed to show that the early luminous blue peak survives; otherwise the best-studied case for the shared-progenitor argument is insecure.
  2. §2.2, Table 2, Fig. 3: Many LFBOT parameters (especially Mpre, Norb, vslow, Mfast) are poorly constrained or only marginally constrained for a large fraction of the comparison sample, yet population trends (Mpre–Norb correlation; M*–Tfloor correlation) and the interpretation of SN 2011kl’s long plateau as “extended pre-merger mass-loss” are drawn from them. The paper should either restrict trend statements to events with well-constrained posteriors or quantify the fraction of the sample that drives each correlation, so that the claimed differences between SN 2011kl and the LFBOT population are not overstated.
  3. §3, Fig. 4, Table 3: The host comparison uses only five ULGRBs spanning 0.35 ≲ z ≲ 1.77 against LFBOTs at z ≲ 0.33, with a delayed-τ SFH for ULGRBs versus the non-parametric SFH used for LFBOTs in Nugent et al. (2026). The text notes that non-parametric masses can be 25–100% larger; without a uniform re-analysis or an explicit systematic floor, the statement that ULGRB hosts are “not clearly distinct” from LFBOT/LGRB hosts is only weakly supported and should be framed more cautiously.
minor comments (5)
  1. §2.1: Fix M• = 10 M⊙ is stated but its impact on derived Macc and M* is only briefly noted; a short sensitivity check or explicit caveat in the text would help.
  2. Fig. 2 caption and text: GRB 101225A is shown without afterglow subtraction and without a formal fit; clarify that the comparison is qualitative only.
  3. Appendix A / Fig. 5: The SNLC models are useful but the connection to the main Metzger-model parameters (especially Norb and Mpre) is left implicit; a short mapping paragraph would strengthen the appendix.
  4. Table 2 footnote b: Events dominated by the “fast” component have unreliable slow-component inferences; flag these more prominently when discussing population trends.
  5. Typographical: “F ast Blue” in the title; inconsistent spacing around ∼ and ≲; “kkm s−1” for vslow units.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Minor self-citation of the Metzger (2022) LFBOT framework as the analysis tool; the SN 2011kl fit and host comparison remain independent of that citation and are not forced by construction.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [§1 Introduction; §2.1 Data and Metzger Model Description]
    "Like ULGRBs, He-CO mergers have been theorized as a progenitor system of LFBOTs (Metzger 2022; Klencki & Metzger 2025). ... For both SN 2011kl and the LFBOT comparison sample, we fit the UVONIR data to a toy model presented in Metzger (2022); see their Section 2."

    The physical scenario under test (He-CO merger as common origin) and the concrete light-curve model used to claim 'LFBOT consistency' for SN 2011kl are both taken from prior papers whose author lists overlap with the present work. This is ordinary self-citation of a modeling framework rather than a closed derivation: the paper still performs an independent multi-parameter fit to new photometry and an independent host analysis. The circularity is therefore minor and non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper applies an existing analytical LFBOT model (Metzger 2022) to archival photometry of SN 2011kl plus an additive power-law afterglow, fits free parameters (M*, Mpre, Norb, velocities, γUV, Tfloor, etc.), and reports that the light curve is broadly consistent while noting differences (longer plateau, stronger UV suppression). Host stellar-population properties are derived independently with Prospector and compared to field, LFBOT, and LGRB samples. No equation reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction; no uniqueness theorem is imported; the shared-progenitor conclusion is an interpretive inference from the fit quality and host locus, not a tautology. Self-citation of the Metzger/Klencki/Fryer framework supplies the physical scenario being tested but does not close the logical loop. An independent SNLC shock-heating exploration in Appendix A further shows the result is not locked to one ansatz. Score 2 reflects only the non-load-bearing self-citation of the modeling framework.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

9 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of an existing analytical LFBOT model (itself built on He-CO merger assumptions), a fixed companion mass, several free light-curve parameters fitted to sparse multi-band data, an additive power-law afterglow, and a delayed-τ star-formation history for hosts with limited photometry. No new physical entities are invented; the free parameters and domain assumptions are the main load-bearing ingredients.

free parameters (9)
  • M* (WR mass at merger) = SN 2011kl: 11+0.91/-0.86 M⊙; LFBOTs typically ~20 M⊙
    Uniform prior U(5,100) M⊙; fitted per event; controls total ejecta and accreted mass.
  • Mpre = fpre M* (pre-runaway CSM mass) = SN 2011kl: 1.9+0.73/-0.41 M⊙
    Uniform prior; controls shock-heating deposition and plateau duration.
  • Norb (effective number of binary orbits of mass loss) = SN 2011kl: 79+14/-22
    Uniform prior U(10,100); sets radial extent of pre-merger material and shock-heated timescale.
  • vslow, Mfast, vfast = SN 2011kl: vslow~6900 km/s, Mfast~0.07 M⊙, vfast~0.19c
    Equatorial and polar ejecta velocities and masses; free with broad uniform priors.
  • γUV (UV suppression index) = SN 2011kl: ~8
    Phenomenological Fν ∝ (λ/3000 Å)^γUV for λrest ≲ 3000 Å; free U(0,15).
  • Tfloor (minimum photospheric temperature) = lowest among sample for SN 2011kl
    Floor before photosphere recedes; free U(1.5,30) kK.
  • σ (white-noise floor)
    Added in quadrature to photometric errors; free U(0,0.5) mag.
  • Afterglow αAG, β, Fν0 = αAG=1.60+0.03/-0.03, β=1.10+0.03/-0.03
    Power-law synchrotron component FAG ∝ t^-α ν^-β fitted jointly for SN 2011kl.
  • Fixed M• = 10 M⊙ = 10 M⊙ (fixed)
    Companion black-hole mass held fixed for all events; affects derived Macc.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption LFBOTs and (some) ULGRBs arise from tidal disruption/hyper-accretion of a WR/He star onto a compact companion (Metzger 2022 framework).
    Invoked throughout §1–2 as the physical basis for applying the analytical light-curve model.
  • domain assumption Optical emission is powered by shock interaction with pre-existing CSM plus reprocessed radiation from accretion/jet; black-body SED with optional UV suppression and temperature floor.
    Core of the toy model fitted in §2.1.
  • ad hoc to paper Afterglow can be separated as an additive power-law in time and frequency with no required jet break.
    Adopted for GRB 111209A despite literature debate on a ~9-day break (§2.1).
  • domain assumption Delayed-τ star-formation history is adequate for ULGRB hosts that have only 2–4 photometric bands.
    Chosen in §3.1 instead of the non-parametric SFH used for LFBOTs to avoid over-fitting.
  • domain assumption Host stellar-mass and sSFR comparisons to field galaxies (Leja et al. 2022) and LGRBs are meaningful despite redshift mismatch between ULGRB and LFBOT samples.
    Used in §3.2 to argue environmental similarity.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 28567 in / 3743 out tokens · 42439 ms · 2026-07-10T17:26:10.513578+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Ultra-long gamma-ray bursts (ULGRBs) and luminous fast blue optical transients (LFBOTs) are two rare classes of engine-driven transients whose physical connection remains unknown. It has been suggested that both may arise from the mergers of a massive helium core with a compact object. We investigate this common origin by reanalyzing the optical counterpart of the highly unusual GRB 111209A/SN 2011kl associated with an ULGRB in the context of a recently developed, analytical LFBOT model. We find that SN 2011kl is broadly consistent with an LFBOT origin, exhibiting a rapid, luminous and blue early emission. However, compared to the LFBOT population, SN~2011kl features a longer "plateau" of emission ~2 weeks post-merger, suggesting an extended pre-merger mass-loss history, as well as stronger UV suppression. We additionally compare the host galaxy environments of five ULGRBs to those of LFBOTs and classical LGRBs. We find that ULGRBs, similar to LFBOTs and long GRBs, tend to occur in lower mass (<10^10 solar masses) galaxies with higher amounts of active star formation than observed for field galaxy populations at similar redshifts. Together, these results support a shared progenitor for at least a subset of ULGRBs and LFBOTs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07819 by Anya E. Nugent, Brian D. Metzger, Christopher L. Fryer, Eric Burns, Jakub Klencki, Tarraneh Eftekhari, V. Ashley Villar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Multi-band, joint fit for the GRB 111209A af￾terglow and SN 2011kl optical transient. We use fixed host-galaxy AB magnitudes of mu = 26.0, mg = 25.66, mr = 25.04, mi = 24.36, mz = 24.02, mJ = 23.39, mH = 22.84, and mKs = 21.56 (Greiner et al. 2015). We consider five ULGRBs from the literature with measured redshifts: GRB 101225A (the “Christmas burst”), GRB 111209A (associated with SN 2011kl), GRB 121027A,… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Rest-frame light curve of SN 2011kl (red circles, using i as the a proxy for rest-frame g) with the fitted AG component removed compared to our best-fit LFBOT model (blue curves) and a sample of comparison transients. For reference, we show the light curve of the broad-lined Type Ic supernova SN 1998bw (purple curve; Clocchiatti et al. 2011), as well as several LFBOTs: AT 2018cow (dark green triangles; Per… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: LFBOT/SN 2011kl marginal posterior distributions for shared fit parameters. Grey histograms show the joint LFBOT sample. Colored curves highlight longer-duration LFBOTs AT2020mrf and AT2024aehp which, similar to SN 2011kl, have higher inferred Norb compared to the broader population. SN 2011kl (blue) is not included in the pooled LFBOT sample [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The hosts of ULGRBs (multicolor squares), LFBOTs (blue circles), and LGRBs (cyan diamonds), compared to a field galaxy population from the 3D-HST and COSMOS2015 surveys (Skelton et al. 2014; Laigle et al. 2016; Leja et al. 2022), separated into three redshift bins. We also highlight the SFMS determined in Leja et al. (2022) for all three redshift bins (dashed black line). All three transient populations ap… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Bolometric light curve of SN 2011kl and comparative models in the rest frame. Black points show our pseudo-bolo￾metric estimates for SN 2011kl. For comparison, we show the bolometric estimate from Ioka et al. (2016), which is in broad agreement with our estimate. Colored curves show SNLC shock-heating models (Models a–g); model parameters are given in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

239 extracted references · 239 canonical work pages · 35 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    A new population of ultra-long duration gamma-ray bursts , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.20523 , year=

    AT 2024wpp: the most luminous fast-evolving optical transient linked to the merger explosion of a black-hole binary , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.20523 , year=

    work page arXiv

  3. [3]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    The Koala: a fast blue optical transient with luminous radio emission from a starburst dwarf galaxy at z= 0.27 , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    GRB Coordinates Network , volume=

    Fermi GBM Triggers 250702B, C, D and E are likely from the same source , author=. GRB Coordinates Network , volume=

    work page

  5. [5]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    The Most Luminous Known Fast Blue Optical Transient AT 2024wpp: Unprecedented Evolution and Properties in the Ultraviolet to the Near-infrared , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    work page 2026

  6. [6]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Real-time discovery of AT2020xnd: a fast, luminous ultraviolet transient with minimal radioactive ejecta , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    CSS 161010: A luminous fast blue optical transient with broad blueshifted hydrogen lines , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , volume=

    emcee: the MCMC hammer , author=. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    MUSSES2020J: the earliest discovery of a fast blue ultraluminous transient at redshift 1.063 , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Nuclear Dominated Accretion Flows in Two Dimensions. II. Ejecta dynamics and nucleosynthesis for CO and ONe white dwarfs

    Nuclear-dominated accretion flows in two dimensions - II. Ejecta dynamics and nucleosynthesis for CO and ONe white dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1701 , archivePrefix =. 1905.06343 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1701 1905

  11. [11]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    The X-ray and radio loud fast blue optical transient AT2020mrf: implications for an emerging class of engine-driven massive star explosions , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    The Peculiar Transient AT2018cow: A Possible Origin of a Type Ibn/IIn Supernova , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    The Astronomical Journal , volume=

    The ultimate light curve of SN 1998bw/GRB 980425 , author=. The Astronomical Journal , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    work page 2011

  14. [14]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    A Late-time Radio Search for Highly Off-axis Jets from PTF Broad-lined Ic Supernovae in GRB-like Host Galaxy Environments , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , volume=

    Low-cost access to the deep, high-cadence sky: the argus optical array , author=. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    LSST: from science drivers to reference design and anticipated data products , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    A search for extragalactic fast blue optical transients in ZTF and the rate of AT2018cow-like transients , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    An embedded X-ray source shines through the aspherical AT 2018cow: revealing the inner workings of the most luminous fast-evolving optical transients , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    A mildly relativistic outflow from the energetic, fast-rising blue optical transient CSS161010 in a dwarf galaxy , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    The fast, luminous ultraviolet transient AT2018cow: extreme supernova, or disruption of a star by an intermediate-mass black hole? , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    GRB 091024A and the nature of ultra-long gamma-ray bursts , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    work page 2013

  22. [22]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    Early-time photometry and spectroscopy of the fast evolving SN 2006aj associated with GRB 060218 , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    work page

  23. [23]

    Nature , volume=

    A neutron-star-driven X-ray flash associated with supernova SN 2006aj , author=. Nature , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    work page 2006

  24. [24]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    The kangaroo’s first hop: the early fast cooling phase of EP250108a/SN 2025kg , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    EP250108a/SN 2025kg: A Jet-driven Stellar Explosion Interacting with Circumstellar Material , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    EP 250108a/SN 2025kg: observations of the most nearby broad-line type Ic supernova following an Einstein Probe fast X-ray transient , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Luminous Fast Blue Optical Transients as "Failed" Gravitational-wave Sources: Helium Core$-$Black Hole Mergers Following Delayed Dynamical Instability

    Luminous Fast Blue Optical Transients as" Failed" Gravitational Wave Sources: Helium Core - Black Hole Mergers Following Delayed Dynamical Instability , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.09745 , year=

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Are ultra-long gamma-ray bursts caused by blue supergiant collapsars, newborn magnetars, or white dwarf tidal disruption events? , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    The third swift burst alert telescope gamma-ray burst catalog , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    The volumetric rate of superluminous supernovae at z 1 , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    Comprehensive X-Ray Observations of the Exceptional Ultralong X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Transient GRB 250702B with Swift, NuSTAR, and Chandra: Insights from the X-Ray Afterglow Properties , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Nature , volume=

    Minutes-duration optical flares with supernova luminosities , author=. Nature , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Spectrum formation in superluminous supernovae (Type I) , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    The Type I superluminous supernova catalogue I: light-curve properties, models, and catalogue description , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Rapidly evolving and luminous transients from Pan-STARRS1 , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Explaining Nonmerger Gamma-Ray Bursts and Broad-lined Supernovae with Close Binary Progenitors with Black Hole Central Engines , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Nature , volume=

    The unusual -ray burst GRB 101225A from a helium star/neutron star merger at redshift 0.33 , author=. Nature , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    The merger of a helium star and a black hole: gamma-ray bursts , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    work page

  39. [39]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    Helium star/black hole mergers: a new gamma-ray burst model , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    work page

  40. [40]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    GRB 211024B: an ultra-long GRB powered by magnetar , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    The ultra-long gamma-ray burst 111209A: the collapse of a blue supergiant? , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    work page 2013

  42. [43]

    Charles Meegan and Giselher Lichti and P. N. Bhat and Elisabetta Bissaldi and Michael S. Briggs and Valerie Connaughton and Roland Diehl and Gerald Fishman and Jochen Greiner and Andrew S. Hoover and Alexander J. van der Horst and Andreas von Kienlin and R. Marc Kippen and Chryssa Kouveliotou and Sheila McBreen and W. S. Paciesas and Robert Preece and Hel...

    work page 2009

  43. [44]

    J. L. Racusin and E. Burns and A. Goldstein and V. Connaughton and C. A. Wilson-Hodge and P. Jenke and L. Blackburn and M. S. Briggs and J. Broida and J. Camp and N. Christensen and C. M. Hui and T. Littenberg and P. Shawhan and L. Singer and J. Veitch and P. N. Bhat and W. Cleveland and G. Fitzpatrick and M. H. Gibby and A. von Kienlin and S. McBreen and...

    work page 2017

  44. [45]

    Ackermann and M

    M. Ackermann and M. Ajello and A. Albert and B. Anderson and M. Arimoto and W. B. Atwood and M. Axelsson and L. Baldini and J. Ballet and G. Barbiellini and M. G. Baring and D. Bastieri and J. Becerra Gonzalez and R. Bellazzini and E. Bissaldi and R. D. Blandford and E. D. Bloom and R. Bonino and E. Bottacini and T. J. Brandt and J. Bregeon and R. J. Brit...

    work page 2016

  45. [46]

    , keywords =

    Frequency of fast, narrow gamma-ray bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/308434a0 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1038/308434a0

  46. [47]

    Dezalay and C

    J.‐P. Dezalay and C. Barat and R. Talon and R. Sunyaev and O. Terekhov and A. Kuznetsov , title =. AIP Conference Proceedings , volume =. 1991 , doi =

    work page 1991

  47. [48]

    , keywords =

    Identification of two classes of gamma-ray bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/186969 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/186969

  48. [49]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The Locations of Short Gamma-Ray Bursts as Evidence for Compact Object Binary Progenitors. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/18 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/776/1/18

  49. [50]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Short-Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035926 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035926

  50. [51]

    , eprint =

    The afterglow of GRB 050709 and the nature of the short-hard -ray bursts. , eprint =. doi:10.1038/nature04189 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1038/nature04189

  51. [52]

    , eprint =

    The optical afterglow of the short -ray burst GRB 050709. , eprint =. doi:10.1038/nature04174 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1038/nature04174

  52. [53]

    , eprint =

    GRB 050509B: Constraints on Short Gamma-Ray Burst Models. , eprint =. doi:10.1086/491733 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/491733

  53. [54]

    , eprint =

    The Afterglow, Energetics, and Host Galaxy of the Short-Hard Gamma-Ray Burst 051221a. , eprint =. doi:10.1086/506429 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/506429

  54. [55]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The optical afterglows and host galaxies of three short/hard gamma-ray bursts. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200811294 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200811294

  55. [56]

    MNRAS , author =

    Limits on radioactive powered emission associated with a short-hard GRB 070724A in a star-forming galaxy. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16327.x , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16327.x 2010

  56. [57]

    MNRAS , author =

    Discovery of the afterglow and host galaxy of the low-redshift short GRB 080905A. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17115.x , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17115.x 2010

  57. [58]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    An r-process Kilonova Associated with the Short-hard GRB 130603B. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/774/2/L23 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/774/2/l23 2041

  58. [59]

    , keywords =

    Nucleosynthesis, neutrino bursts and gamma-rays from coalescing neutron stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/340126a0 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1038/340126a0

  59. [60]

    , eprint =

    Gamma-ray bursts as the death throes of massive binary stars. , eprint =. doi:10.1086/186493 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/186493

  60. [61]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope Mission. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1071 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/697/2/1071

  61. [62]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Searching for High-energy Gamma-ray Counterparts to Gravitational-wave Sources with Fermi-LAT: A Needle in a Haystack. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa7262 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa7262 2041

  62. [63]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Fermi Observations of GRB 090510: A Short-Hard Gamma-ray Burst with an Additional, Hard Power-law Component from 10 keV TO GeV Energies. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/1178 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/716/2/1178

  63. [64]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Two Micron All Sky Survey Photometric Redshift Catalog: A Comprehensive Three-dimensional Census of the Whole Sky. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/210/1/9 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/210/1/9

  64. [65]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The First Fermi-LAT Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/11 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/11

  65. [66]

    GCN , volume =

    LIGO/Virgo G298048: Updated sky map from gravitational-wave data , author =. GCN , volume =

    work page

  66. [67]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Parameter estimation for compact binaries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations using the LALInference software library , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    work page 2015

  67. [68]

    Singer and Hsin-Yu Chen and Daniel E

    Leo P. Singer and Hsin-Yu Chen and Daniel E. Holz and Will M. Farr and Larry R. Price and Vivien Raymond and S. Bradley Cenko and Neil Gehrels and John Cannizzo and Mansi M. Kasliwal and Samaya Nissanke and Michael Coughlin and Ben Farr and Alex L. Urban and Salvatore Vitale and John Veitch and Philip Graff and Christopher P. L. Berry and Satya Mohapatra ...

    work page

  68. [69]

    , keywords =

    Cosmological gamma-ray bursts. , keywords =

    work page

  69. [70]

    , keywords =

    Gamma-ray bursters at cosmological distances. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/184740 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/184740

  70. [71]

    Narayana Bhat and Charles A

    P. Narayana Bhat and Charles A. Meegan and Andreas von Kienlin and William S. Paciesas and Michael S. Briggs and J. Michael Burgess and Eric Burns and Vandiver Chaplin and William H. Cleveland and Andrew C. Collazzi and Valerie Connaughton and Anne M. Diekmann and Gerard Fitzpatrick and Melissa H. Gibby and Misty M. Giles and Adam M. Goldstein and Jochen ...

    work page 2016

  71. [72]

    , year = 2017, volume =

    An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: \\ -GBM observations of GRB 170817A. , year = 2017, volume =

    work page 2017

  72. [73]

    Abbott, B. P. and others. GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.161101 2017

  73. [74]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/791 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/702/1/791

  74. [75]

    , journal=

    Gravitational Waves and Gamma Rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A. , journal=. 2017 , doi=

    work page 2017

  75. [76]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    On Computing Upper Limits to Source Intensities. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/900 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/719/1/900

  76. [77]

    , year = 2017, volume=

    Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merge. , year = 2017, volume=

    work page 2017

  77. [78]

    Science , year = 2017, doi=

    Discovery of Swope Supernova Survey 17a (SSS17a),\\ the First Optical Counterpart to a\\ Gravitational Wave Source. Science , year = 2017, doi=

    work page 2017

  78. [79]

    LIGO/Virgo G298048: Potential optical counterpart discovered by Swope telescope

    work page

  79. [80]

    GW150914: The Advanced LIGO Detectors in the Era of First Discoveries , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2016 , month =

    work page 2016

  80. [81]

    CQGra , year = 2010, month = apr, volume = 27, number = 8, pages =

    Advanced LIGO: the next generation of gravitational wave detectors. CQGra , year = 2010, month = apr, volume = 27, number = 8, pages =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/8/084006 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/8/084006 2010

Showing first 80 references.