Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 42 references

eXTP's combined X-ray spectrum, timing and polarimetry will tighten black-hole spin and strong-field GR tests beyond current missions.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 05:18 UTC pith:WLIR63WF

load-bearing objection Solid conference summary of the eXTP strong-gravity white paper; useful capability forecasts, no new science.

arxiv 2607.09112 v1 pith:WLIR63WF submitted 2026-07-10 astro-ph.HE gr-qc

Physics and Astrophysics of Black Holes with eXTP

Cosimo Bambi This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE gr-qc
keywords eXTPblack-hole spinX-ray reflection spectroscopycontinuum fittingX-ray polarimetrystrong-field gravity testsquasi-periodic oscillationsdisk-corona model
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review argues that the forthcoming eXTP mission can measure masses and spins of accreting black holes and test whether their spacetime is Kerr by combining spectral, timing and polarimetric X-ray data. Its Spectroscopic Focusing Array has a larger effective area than existing instruments, so the same 30 ks exposure recovers input spin more tightly and places stronger joint limits on spin and a deformation parameter that quantifies deviations from Kerr. Polarimetry further constrains corona geometry, while timing of quasi-periodic oscillations and reverberation lags can yield masses once the correct model is identified. The same data set can address open questions about spin distributions, jet launching and corona evolution for both stellar-mass and supermassive black holes. Realizing these gains requires more advanced polarimetric models before the planned 2030 launch.

Core claim

Simulations of bright black-hole X-ray binaries show that eXTP/SFA recovers the input spin more precisely than NICER/XTI for identical 30 ks exposures and places substantially tighter joint constraints on spin and the Johannsen deformation parameter that vanishes only for Kerr, demonstrating that the mission's larger collecting area plus simultaneous polarimetry can deliver sharper strong-field tests of general relativity.

What carries the argument

The disk-corona model (thermal disk photons inverse-Comptonized in a hot corona, producing a relativistic reflection spectrum) analysed with the reflection codes relxill and relxill_nk that map observed line profiles and continuum shapes onto black-hole spin and possible non-Kerr deformation parameters.

Load-bearing premise

The forecasts assume that the phenomenological reflection model and the chosen simulation parameters correctly represent real corona geometries and disk ionization; if they do not, the claimed precision gains shrink.

What would settle it

After launch, compare the spin and deformation-parameter posteriors obtained from the same bright X-ray binary with eXTP/SFA versus contemporaneous NICER data; if the eXTP contours are not systematically tighter, the area-driven improvement claim fails.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This conference contribution reviews the expected capabilities of the eXTP mission (launch ~2030) for black-hole astrophysics and strong-field gravity tests. After summarizing the SFA, PFA and W2C instruments and the standard disk-corona framework, the paper outlines how combined spectral, timing and polarimetric observations can measure black-hole masses (continuum + reflection, reverberation, variability/QPOs) and spins (reflection spectroscopy, continuum fitting, polarimetry, QPOs), and can constrain deviations from the Kerr metric (primarily via reflection with relxill_nk). Concrete end-to-end simulations for bright stellar-mass sources (flux 2e-8 erg cm^-2 s^-1, 30 ks and 300 ks exposures) are presented in Figs. 2–3, showing that eXTP/SFA recovers input spin more tightly than NICER/XTI and yields substantially smaller joint contours on spin and the Johannsen deformation parameter α13. The text closes by stressing the need for more advanced polarimetric models before launch.

Significance. If the forecasts hold, eXTP will deliver a step-change in the precision of spin and Kerr-deviation measurements for both stellar-mass and supermassive black holes, and will open a new polarimetric channel that can break geometric degeneracies. The manuscript’s principal strength is the transparent, end-to-end simulation comparison (Figs. 2–3) that quantifies the gain relative to NICER under identical exposure and model assumptions; these figures, together with the clear mapping onto the six open questions listed in Sec. 2, make the white-paper results accessible to a broader astrophysics audience. The work is therefore a useful, timely summary for the community preparing for eXTP.

minor comments (5)
  1. Fig. 2 caption: “demostrates” → “demonstrates”; also “We employ therelxillmodel” needs spaces (“the relxill model”).
  2. Fig. 3 caption and body: the deformation parameter is written both as α13 and α_13; adopt a single notation throughout.
  3. Sec. 1, instrument list: the SFA-T total effective area is given as 2750 cm^{2} at 1.5 keV; a brief parenthetical comparison with NICER’s effective area would help non-specialist readers appreciate the factor-of-several gain claimed later.
  4. Sec. 4, continuum-fitting paragraph: the factor-of-∼3 reduction in spin uncertainty relative to NICER is stated without a supporting figure or table; a short quantitative sentence or reference to the white-paper table would strengthen the claim.
  5. Throughout: a few missing spaces after periods and before citations (e.g., “blackholes.Inthiscontribution”) remain from the arXiv conversion; a light copy-edit pass will remove them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: capability review with independent simulation forecasts, not a closed derivation loop.

full rationale

This manuscript is a short conference summary of the eXTP strong-gravity white paper. It does not claim to derive new physical quantities, uniqueness theorems, or first-principles predictions from fitted parameters. The quantitative statements (Figs. 2–3) are forward-looking instrument simulations that inject known input values (a_sim, α13=0, Γ=1.7, q=3, etc.) into the public phenomenological models relxill and relxill_nk and then recover those same inputs with smaller error bars for eXTP/SFA than for NICER/XTI. Recovery of injected parameters is the expected, non-circular behavior of a simulation study; the paper never renames a fit as an independent prediction. Self-citations (to the author’s earlier methodological papers and to the collaboration white paper [3]) supply the simulation setup and prior context; they are not load-bearing uniqueness claims that force the result. The open questions listed in Section 2 and the model-dependence caveats in Sections 4–5 are left open. Consequently the derivation chain is empty of circular steps and the circularity score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review of mission capabilities, the load-bearing content is the set of domain assumptions about accretion physics and the free parameters chosen for the illustrative simulations. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • simulation flux (2–10 keV) = 2e-8 erg cm^{-2} s^{-1}
    Fixed at 2×10^{-8} erg cm^{-2} s^{-1} to represent a ‘bright’ black-hole binary; the claimed precision gains scale with this choice.
  • exposure times = 30 ks / 300 ks
    30 ks and 300 ks chosen by hand for the comparison plots; longer exposures tighten contours by construction.
  • relxill input parameters (Γ, E_cut, q, A_Fe, log ξ, R_f, i) = Γ=1.7, E_cut=300 keV, q=3, A_Fe=1, logξ=3, R_f=1, i=45°/70°
    Standard but arbitrary values (Γ=1.7, q=3, log ξ=3, etc.) used to generate the mock spectra that demonstrate eXTP’s superiority.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption The Novikov–Thorne thin-disk model correctly describes the thermal continuum of stellar-mass black holes in the soft state.
    Invoked throughout Sections 3–4 as the basis for continuum-fitting mass and spin measurements.
  • domain assumption The phenomenological reflection model relxill (and its non-Kerr extension) adequately captures the relativistic iron line and Compton hump.
    Used for all spin-recovery and Kerr-test simulations in Sections 4–5.
  • domain assumption Astrophysical black holes are described by the Kerr metric (or a controlled deformation thereof) in the absence of exotic matter or modified gravity.
    Baseline hypothesis being tested; stated in the opening of Section 5.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 15654 in / 2283 out tokens · 34387 ms · 2026-07-13T05:18:38.675258+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The enhanced X-ray Timing and Polarimetry (eXTP) mission will combine spectral, timing, and polarimetric techniques to study accreting black holes, measure their masses and spins, and test Einstein's theory of General Relativity in the strong-field regime. In this contribution, I review the capabilities of eXTP to advance our current understanding of black hole physics and astrophysics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09112 by Cosimo Bambi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Sketch of the disk-corona model (left) and examples of possible coronal geometries (right). Figure from Ref. [7]. it efficiently radiates: its thermal spectrum scales as 𝑀−1/4 , where 𝑀 is the black hole mass. Consequently, the spectrum peaks in the soft X-ray band (0.1-10 keV) for stellar-mass black holes in X-ray binaries, and in the UV/optical band (1-100 eV) for supermassive black holes in active galac… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Ability of eXTP/SFA and NICER/XTI to recover black hole spins. The simulations assume bright black hole X-ray binaries (flux 2 · 10−8 erg cm−2 s −1 in the 2-10 keV band) and an exposure time of 30 ks. We employ the relxill model [24, 25] with the following input parameters: photon index Γ = 1.7, cutoff energy 𝐸cut = 300 keV, inner disk radius at the innermost stable circular orbit 𝑅in = 𝑅ISCO, disk inclina… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Ability of eXTP/SFA and NICER/XTI to test the Kerr geometry. We show the measurements of the spin parameter 𝑎∗ and of the Johannsen deformation parameter 𝛼13 (𝛼13 = 0 corresponds to the Kerr solution, while 𝛼13 ≠ 0 indicates a deviation from the Kerr geometry) for a 30 ks observation with NICER/XTI (in green), a 30 ks observation with eXTP/SFA (in orange), and a 300 ks observation with eXTP/SFA (in blue). … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    S. N. Zhang, A. Santangelo, Y. Xu, H. Feng, F. Lu, Y. Chen, M. Ge, K. Nandra, X. Wu and M. Feroci,et al. The enhanced X-ray Timing and Polarimetry mission—eXTP for launch in 2030, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68, 119502 (2025) [erratum: Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.69, 239551 (2025)], https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-025-2786-6 [arXiv:2506.08101 [astro-ph.HE]]

    doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2786-6 2030

  2. [2]

    Ge,et al

    A.Li, A.L.Watts, G.Zhang, S.Guillot, Y.Xu, A.Santangelo, S.Zane, H.Feng, S.N.Zhang and M. Ge,et al. Dense matter in neutron stars with eXTP, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68, 119503 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-025-2761-4 [arXiv:2506.08104 [astro- ph.HE]]

    doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2761-4 2025

  3. [3]

    Q. Bu, C. Bambi, L. Gou, Y. Xu, P. Uttley, A. De Rosa, A. Santangelo, S. Zane, H. Feng and S. N. Zhang,et al. Probing the strong gravity region of black holes with eXTP, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68, 119504 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-025-2789-2 [arXiv:2506.08105 [astro-ph.HE]]. 8 Physics and Astrophysics of Black Holes with eXTPCosimo Bambi

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2789-2 2025

  4. [4]

    M. Ge, L. Ji, R. Taverna, S. Tsygankov, Y. Xu, A. Santangelo, S. Zane, S. N. Zhang, H. Feng and W. Chen,et al. Physics of strong magnetism with eXTP, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68, 119505 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-025-2796-y [arXiv:2506.08369 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2796-y 2025

  5. [5]

    S. X. Yi, W. Zhao, R. X. Xu, X. F. Wu, G. Stratta, S. Dall’Osso, Y. J. Xu, A. Santangelo, S. Zane and S. N. Zhang,et al. Prospects for time-domain and multi-messenger science with eXTP, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68, 119506 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433- 025-2782-2 [arXiv:2506.08368 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s11433- 2025

  6. [6]

    P.Zhou,J.Mao,L.Zhang,A.Patruno,E.Bozzo,Y.Xu,A.Santangelo,S.Zane,S.Zhangand S.N.Zhang,etal.ObservatorysciencewitheXTP,Sci.ChinaPhys.Mech.Astron.68,119507 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-025-2799-0 [arXiv:2506.08367 [astro-ph.IM]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2799-0 2025

  7. [7]

    Black hole X-ray spectra: notes on the relativistic calculations

    C. Bambi,Black hole X-ray spectra: notes on the relativistic calculations, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.12262 [arXiv:2408.12262 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.12262

  8. [8]

    G. Matt, G. C. Perola and L. Piro,The iron line and high energy bump as X-ray signatures of cold matter in Seyfert 1 galaxiesAstron. Astrophys.247, 25 (1991)

    1991

  9. [9]

    Martocchia and G

    A. Martocchia and G. Matt,Iron K𝛼line intensity from accretion discs around rotating black holes,Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc.282,L53(1996),https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/282.4.L53

    doi:10.1093/mnras/282.4.l53 1996

  10. [10]

    D. N. Page and K. S. Thorne,Disk-Accretion onto a Black Hole. Time-Averaged Structure of Accretion Disk, Astrophys. J.191, 499-506 (1974), https://doi.org/10.1086/152990

    doi:10.1086/152990 1974

  11. [11]

    N. I. Shakura and R. A. Sunyaev,Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance, Astron. Astrophys.24, 337-355 (1973)

    1973

  12. [12]

    R. R. Ross and A. C. Fabian,A Comprehensive range of x-ray ionized reflection mod- els, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.358, 211-216 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2966.2005.08797.x [arXiv:astro-ph/0501116 [astro-ph]]

    doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2005

  13. [13]

    Garcia and T

    J. Garcia and T. Kallman,X-ray reflected spectra from accretion disk models. I. Con- stant density atmospheres, Astrophys. J.718, 695 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1088/0004- 637X/718/2/695 [arXiv:1006.0485 [astro-ph.HE]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004- 2010

  14. [14]

    C. Bambi,Black Holes: A Laboratory for Testing Strong Gravity(Springer Sin- gapore, 2017), ISBN 978-981-10-4523-3, 978-981-13-5158-7, 978-981-10-4524-0, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4524-0

    doi:10.1007/978-981-10-4524-0 2017

  15. [15]

    I. D. Novikov and K. S. Thorne,Astrophysics and black holes, inBlack Holes(Eds. C. De Witt and B. De Witt, Gordon and Breach, New York, USA, 1973), pp. 343-450

    1973

  16. [16]

    S. N. Zhang, W. Cui and W. Chen,Black hole spin in X-ray binaries: Observational conse- quences, Astrophys. J. Lett.482, L155 (1997), https://doi.org/10.1086/310705 [arXiv:astro- ph/9704072 [astro-ph]]. 9 Physics and Astrophysics of Black Holes with eXTPCosimo Bambi

    doi:10.1086/310705 1997

  17. [17]

    J. E. McClintock, R. Narayan and J. F. Steiner,Black Hole Spin via Continuum Fitting and the Role of Spin in Powering Transient Jets, Space Sci. Rev.183, 295-322 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-0003-9 [arXiv:1303.1583 [astro-ph.HE]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s11214-013-0003-9 2014

  18. [18]

    P. A. Draghis, J. M. Miller, A. Zoghbi, M. Reynolds, E. Costantini, L. C. Gallo and J. A. Tomsick,A Systematic View of Ten New Black Hole Spins, Astrophys. J.946, 19 (2023), https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acafe7 [arXiv:2210.02479 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acafe7 2023

  19. [19]

    A. C. Fabian, M. J. Rees, L. Stella and N. E. White,X-ray fluorescence from the inner disc in Cygnus X-1, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.238, 729-736 (1989), https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/238.3.729

    doi:10.1093/mnras/238.3.729 1989

  20. [20]

    Towards precision measurements of accreting black holes using X-ray reflection spectroscopy

    C. Bambi, L. W. Brenneman, T. Dauser, J. A. Garcia, V. Grinberg, A. Ingram, J. Jiang, H. Liu, A. M. Lohfink and A. Marinucci,et al. Towards Precision Measurements of Ac- creting Black Holes Using X-Ray Reflection Spectroscopy, Space Sci. Rev.217, 65 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-021-00841-8 [arXiv:2011.04792 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s11214-021-00841-8 2021

  21. [21]

    M.L.Parker,J.A.Tomsick,J.A.Kennea,J.M.Miller,F.A.Harrison,D.Barret,S.E.Boggs, F. E. Christensen, W. W. Craig and A. C. Fabian,et al. NuSTAR and Swift observations of the very high state in GX 339-4: Weighing the black hole with X-rays, Astrophys. J. Lett.821, L6 (2016), https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/821/1/L6 [arXiv:1603.03777 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8205/821/1/l6 2016

  22. [22]

    S. Riaz, M. Kyriazis, A. B. Abdikamalov, C. Bambi and S. Shashank,Testing regular black holes with X-ray data of GX 339–4, JCAP03, 022 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1088/1475- 7516/2025/03/022 [arXiv:2306.09673 [astro-ph.HE]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475- 2025

  23. [23]

    Paolillo and I

    M. Paolillo and I. Papadakis,Continuum optical-UV and X-ray variability of AGN: current results and future challenges, Riv. Nuovo Cim.48, 537-621 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1007/s40766-025-00072-5 [arXiv:2506.23899 [astro-ph.HE]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s40766-025-00072-5 2025

  24. [24]

    Dauser, J

    T. Dauser, J. Garcia, J. Wilms, M. Bock, L. W. Brenneman, M. Falanga, K. Fukumura and C. S. Reynolds,Irradiation of an Accretion Disc by a Jet: General Properties and Implications for Spin Measurements of Black Holes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.430, 1694 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts710 [arXiv:1301.4922 [astro-ph.HE]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/sts710 2013

  25. [25]

    García, T

    J. García, T. Dauser, A. Lohfink, T. R. Kallman, J. Steiner, J. E. McClintock, L. Brenneman, J. Wilms, W. Eikmann and C. S. Reynolds,et al. Improved Reflection Models of Black-Hole Accretion Disks: Treating the Angular Distribution of X-rays, Astrophys. J.782, 76 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/76 [arXiv:1312.3231 [astro-ph.HE]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/782/2/76 2014

  26. [26]

    Bambi,Testing black hole candidates with electromagnetic radiation, Rev

    C. Bambi,Testing black hole candidates with electromagnetic radiation, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 025001 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.025001 [arXiv:1509.03884 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.025001 2017

  27. [27]

    Z. Cao, S. Nampalliwar, C. Bambi, T. Dauser and J. A. Garcia,Testing general relativity with the reflection spectrum of the supermassive black hole in 1H0707−495, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 051101(2018),https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.051101[arXiv:1709.00219[gr-qc]]. 10 Physics and Astrophysics of Black Holes with eXTPCosimo Bambi

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.051101 2018

  28. [28]

    A.Tripathi,S.Nampalliwar,A.B.Abdikamalov,D.Ayzenberg,C.Bambi,T.Dauser,J.A.Gar- ciaandA.Marinucci,TowardPrecisionTestsofGeneralRelativitywithBlackHoleX-RayRe- flectionSpectroscopy,Astrophys.J.875,56(2019),https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab0e7e [arXiv:1811.08148 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0e7e 2019

  29. [29]

    Tripathi, Y

    A. Tripathi, Y. Zhang, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, J. Jiang, H. Liu and M.Zhou,TestingGeneralRelativitywithNuSTARdataofGalacticBlackHoles,Astrophys.J. 913,79(2021),https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abf6cd[arXiv:2012.10669[astro-ph.HE]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf6cd 2021

  30. [30]

    Bambi,Testing Gravity with Black Hole X-Ray Data, inRecent Progress on Gravity Tests: Challenges and Future Perspectives(Eds

    C. Bambi,Testing Gravity with Black Hole X-Ray Data, inRecent Progress on Gravity Tests: Challenges and Future Perspectives(Eds. C. Bambi and A. Cardenas-Avendano, Springer Singapore, 2024), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2871-8_5 [arXiv:2210.05322 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/978-981-97-2871-8_5 2024

  31. [31]

    M. Zhou, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, H. Liu and S. Nampalliwar,XSPEC model for testing the Kerr black hole hypothesis using the continuum-fitting method, Phys. Rev. D99, 104031 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.104031 [arXiv:1903.09782 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.104031 2019

  32. [32]

    Tripathi, M

    A. Tripathi, M. Zhou, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, L. Gou, V. Grin- berg, H. Liu and J. F. Steiner,Testing general relativity with the stellar-mass black hole in LMC X-1 using the continuum-fitting method, Astrophys. J.897, 84 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab9600 [arXiv:2001.08391 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9600 2020

  33. [33]

    Krawczynski,Tests of General Relativity in the Strong Gravity Regime Based on X-Ray Spectropolarimetric Observations of Black Holes in X-Ray Binaries, Astrophys

    H. Krawczynski,Tests of General Relativity in the Strong Gravity Regime Based on X-Ray Spectropolarimetric Observations of Black Holes in X-Ray Binaries, Astrophys. J.754, 133 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/754/2/133 [arXiv:1205.7063 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/754/2/133 2012

  34. [34]

    D. Liu, Z. Li, Y. Cheng and C. Bambi,X-ray spectropolarimetric measurements of the Kerr metric, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 383 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3600-9 [arXiv:1504.06788 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3600-9 2015

  35. [35]

    C.Bambi,Probingthespace-timegeometryaroundblackholecandidateswiththeresonance models for high-frequency QPOs and comparison with the continuum-fitting method, JCAP 09, 014 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2012/09/014 [arXiv:1205.6348 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/09/014 2012

  36. [36]

    C.Bambi,TestingthenatureoftheblackholecandidateinGROJ1655-40withtherelativistic precession model, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 162 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-015- 3396-7 [arXiv:1312.2228 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015- 2015

  37. [37]

    Bambi, A

    C. Bambi, A. Cardenas-Avendano, T. Dauser, J. A. Garcia and S. Nampalliwar,Testing the Kerr black hole hypothesis using X-ray reflection spectroscopy, Astrophys. J.842, 76 (2017), https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa74c0 [arXiv:1607.00596 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa74c0 2017

  38. [38]

    A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, T. Dauser, J. A. Garcia and S. Nampalliwar, PublicReleaseofRELXILL_NK:ARelativisticReflectionModelforTestingEinstein’sGravity, Astrophys. J.878, 91 (2019), https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab1f89 [arXiv:1902.09665 [gr-qc]]. 11 Physics and Astrophysics of Black Holes with eXTPCosimo Bambi

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1f89 2019

  39. [39]

    A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, T. Dauser, J. A. Garcia, S. Nampalliwar, A. Tripathi and M. Zhou,Testing the Kerr black hole hypothesis using X-ray reflection spectroscopy and a thin disk model with finite thickness, Astrophys. J.899, 80 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aba625 [arXiv:2003.09663 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba625 2020

  40. [40]

    Tripathi, A

    A. Tripathi, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, V. Grinberg and M. Zhou,Testing the Kerr Black Hole Hypothesis with GX 339–4 by a Combined Analysis of Its Thermal SpectrumandReflectionFeatures,Astrophys.J.907,31(2021),https://doi.org/10.3847/1538- 4357/abccbd [arXiv:2010.13474 [astro-ph.HE]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538- 2021

  41. [41]

    Tripathi, A

    A. Tripathi, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, V. Grinberg, H. Liu and M. Zhou, TestingtheKerrblackholehypothesiswiththecontinuum-fittingandtheironlinemethods: the caseofGRS1915+105,JCAP01,019(2022)https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/01/019 [arXiv:2106.10982 [astro-ph.HE]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/01/019 2022

  42. [42]

    Zhang, H

    Z. Zhang, H. Liu, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi and M. Zhou,Testing the KerrBlackHoleHypothesiswithGRS1716-249byCombiningtheContinuumFittingandthe Iron-line Methods, Astrophys. J.924, 72 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac350e [arXiv:2106.03086 [astro-ph.HE]]. 12

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac350e 2022