Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 76 references

Strongly correlated quantum matter: t--J model, real-space pairing, spin-dependent masses, and atomicity in chemical bond and nanosystems

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-13 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Five decades of work on strongly correlated fermions is framed as three core pieces: the t–J model with real-space pairing, spin-dependent quasiparticle masses, and a thermodynamic treatment of the Mott–Hubbard transition.

desk verdict Personal five-decade overview that cleanly restates Spałek’s priority claims for t–J + real-space pairing and spin-dependent masses; archival value only, no new results. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.09465 v1 pith:HOPGQRJ2 submitted 2026-07-10 cond-mat.str-el

Józef Spa{l}ek This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el PACS 71.27.+a74.20.Mn71.30.+h
keywords t–Jmodelreal-spacepairingkineticexchangespin-dependentmassesMott–Hubbardtransitionheavyfermionshigh-TccupratesEDABI
open problems High-Temperature Superconductivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This overview argues that the essential theory of strongly correlated fermions rests on three linked advances. First, a canonical expansion of the Hubbard model in the strong-correlation limit yields the t–J Hamiltonian: projected hopping plus Anderson kinetic exchange, rewritten with real-space singlet pairing operators that compete with single-particle motion and that later models of high-Tc cuprates employ. Second, the same correlation physics produces spin-direction-dependent effective masses of heavy quasiparticles; when a system is magnetically polarized the minority-spin mass diverges toward the Mott limit while the majority mass recovers the bare band value, producing metamagnetism and observable spin-split de Haas–van Alphen frequencies. Third, a nontrivial statistical-mechanical treatment of the Mott–Hubbard transition at finite temperature completes the picture, together with quantum-critical phenomena near localization. Extensions reintroduce atomicity into the chemical bond of H2 and treat correlated nanochains by the exact-diagonalization ab initio (EDABI) method. A sympathetic reader is offered a single coherent view in which kinetic exchange, real-space pairing, mass renormalization, and localization are not separate topics but successive faces of the same strong-correlation limit.

What carries the argument

Canonical perturbation expansion of the Hubbard model in the strong-correlation limit |tij| ≪ (U−K): the Hamiltonian is projected into low- and high-energy Fock subspaces, the mixing terms are eliminated, and the second-order effective Hamiltonian is rewritten with projected spin-singlet pairing operators bij that encode both antiferromagnetic exchange and real-space pair binding.

What would settle it

A controlled measurement (or higher-order calculation) showing that the superconducting dome, the paramagnon spectrum, or the spin-split mass ratio in a cuprate or heavy-fermion compound cannot be reproduced by the projected t–J or t–J–U Hamiltonian and instead requires terms outside that expansion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The author claims that three results he obtained form fundamental components of the modern theory of strongly correlated fermions: the first derivation of the t–J model (Anderson kinetic exchange plus projected real-space pairing operators), the concept of spin-dependent heavy quasiparticle masses, and the first nontrivial thermodynamic model of the Mott–Hubbard transition, all grounded in the strong-correlation paradigm of the 1960s and later applied to high-Tc cuprates, heavy-fermion systems, and simple molecules.

Load-bearing premise

That the second-order projected Hamiltonian obtained by canonical expansion is already a closed, sufficient description of high-temperature superconductivity and does not require additional channels or higher-order processes that would change the phase diagram.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a personal critical overview of the author’s nearly five-decade research program on strongly correlated fermions. It centers on three claimed foundational contributions: (i) the derivation of the t–J model via canonical perturbation expansion of the Hubbard model (Sec. 2, Eqs. 2.5–2.9), incorporating Anderson kinetic exchange and real-space spin-singlet pairing operators (Eqs. 2.12–2.13) later applied to high-Tc cuprates via the t–J–U–(V) model and DE-GWF/SGA methods; (ii) the concept of spin-dependent quasiparticle masses in polarized heavy-fermion systems (Sec. 3.4, Eq. 3.10); and (iii) early statistical-thermodynamic modeling of the Mott–Hubbard transition. Related extensions include the EDABI method for nanosystems and the introduction of “atomicity” as a bonding factor complementary to covalency and ionicity in the H2 molecule (Sec. 4.4). The author positions these, together with quantum-critical phenomena, as core elements of the strong-correlation paradigm established in the 1960s.

Significance. As a first-person historical synthesis by a long-term contributor, the paper usefully consolidates the logical thread from kinetic exchange through projected pairing operators to semi-quantitative cuprate phase diagrams (Figs. 3–6) and spin-split masses. The explicit rewriting of the second-order effective Hamiltonian in terms of real-space pairing operators (Eq. 2.13) and the later DE-GWF results that recover d-wave domes, paramagnon spectra, and both hole- and electron-doped regimes constitute a coherent, falsifiable research line. The EDABI optimization of single-particle orbitals in the correlated state and the atomicity concept for H2 supply concrete, testable extensions beyond standard model Hamiltonians. If the priority and fundamentality claims are accepted within the genre of an author-centered overview, the manuscript serves as a compact archival reference for these ideas and their interconnections.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.4–2.6, Eqs. 2.12–2.13, Figs. 3–4] Abstract and Sec. 2.4–2.6: The central claim that the projected real-space pairing operators (Eqs. 2.12–2.13) obtained from the second-order canonical expansion constitute the microscopic origin of high-Tc superconductivity is load-bearing, yet the DE-GWF phase diagrams (Figs. 3–4) still omit the pseudogap and overestimate the upper critical doping, as the text itself notes in Sec. 2.6.2. A clearer statement is needed of which experimental features are regarded as decisive tests of this origin versus which remain outside the present controlled approximation.
  2. [Sec. 2.1–2.3, Eqs. 2.5–2.9] Sec. 2.1–2.3 and priority statements: The assertion of the “first derivation” of the t–J model (including real-space pairing) rests on the author’s 1977–1988 papers. While the second-order expansion (Eqs. 2.5–2.9) is standard and correctly recovers Anderson kinetic exchange at half-filling, contemporaneous and subsequent independent constructions should be briefly situated so that the distinctive contribution (the closed pairing-operator form) is cleanly separated from the shared kinetic-exchange framework.
  3. [Sec. 3.4, Eq. 3.10; Sec. 4.1] Sec. 3.4 and 4.1, Eq. 3.10: The spin-dependent mass formula follows directly from the projected hopping probability in the U o∞ limit and is consistent with the Gutzwiller renormalization. The subsequent claim that partial polarization renders the two spin species “distinguishable” (Sec. 4.1) is conceptually interesting but remains programmatic (“deferred to a separate paper”). Either a concrete statistical-mechanical consequence or a clear demarcation that this is an open conjecture should be supplied if the concept is listed among the fundamental components.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 3] Fig. 3 caption and surrounding text: The theoretical critical doping is visibly higher than experiment; a quantitative statement of the discrepancy (or of the parameter set used) would help the reader assess the “semi-quantitative” claim.
  2. [Sec. 2.5, Eq. 2.15] Sec. 2.5: The simultaneous presence of finite U and Jij in the t–J–U model is justified by appeal to oxygen-mediated superexchange, but a short estimate of the relative d–d versus d–p–d contributions would make the construction more transparent.
  3. [Sec. 4.4, Fig. 18] Sec. 4.4 and Fig. 18: The atomicity concept is introduced to cure the unphysical growth of covalency at large R. An explicit operational definition (e.g., a formula in terms of the two-particle density matrix or occupation numbers) would allow independent verification.
  4. Throughout: Occasional missing spaces and hyphenation artifacts appear in the arXiv text (e.g., “foralmostfivedecades”); a final proofreading pass is recommended.
  5. [References / Sec. 2.4] References: Several key contemporaneous works on kinetic exchange and RVB are cited, but a short paragraph situating the 1988 pairing-operator paper relative to the contemporaneous literature would strengthen the historical narrative without altering the personal focus.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Personal historical overview with expected self-citations for priority; algebraic rewritings of t–J and spin-dependent masses are self-contained and not circular by construction.

  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract; Sec. 2.1–2.4 (Eqs. 2.9–2.13 and surrounding text)]
    "the first derivation of what is now called the t–J model, comprising both the limit of Anderson kinetic exchange of spin–spin interaction in the Mott–Hubbard insulator and taking into account real-space pairing... our construction [21] to the t–J model... It was surprising to the author to discover that a relatively complex expression of the effective Hamiltonian (2.9) can be brought to the simpler and formally closed form by introducing also the projected spin-singlet pairing operators in the real-space [26]"

    Priority for the t–J model plus real-space pairing is asserted via the author’s own prior publications; the present text re-derives the second-order expansion and rewrites it algebraically into pairing form, but the claim of originality and foundational status rests on those self-citations rather than an independent external source.

  2. self citation load bearing [Sec. 3.4 (Eq. 3.10 and preceding paragraph)]
    "One of the most interesting concepts invoked in my group was the introduction of spin-dependent effective masses [53–56]. This concept is specific for strongly correlated fermions and is due to the spin-dependent renormalization of the hopping part... m* → m*_σ = (1−n_σ)/(1−n) m* ≡ q_σ^{-1} m*."

    The concept of spin-dependent masses and its foundational status are attributed to the author’s group via self-citations; while a short derivation from projected hopping is given here, the claim that this is a fundamental component of the theory rests on the self-referential chain.

full rationale

This is an author-centered critical overview of five decades of work, not a primary derivation paper. The load-bearing mathematical steps—the second-order canonical perturbation expansion of the Hubbard model yielding the effective Hamiltonian (Eqs. 2.5–2.9), its algebraic rewriting via projected real-space singlet pairing operators (Eqs. 2.12–2.13), and the spin-dependent mass renormalization m*_σ = [(1−n_σ)/(1−n)] m* from projected hopping probabilities (Eq. 3.10)—are presented explicitly and do not reduce any claimed prediction or first-principles result to its own inputs by construction. Phase diagrams, paramagnon spectra, and ARPES comparisons arise from the group’s prior SGA/DE-GWF variational framework and are checked against external experimental data; parameters (e.g., J/|t| ≃ 0.3) are chosen but there is no fit-then-predict of a statistically forced near-relative quantity. Self-citations establish archival priority for the t–J construction, real-space pairing, spin-dependent masses, and early Mott thermodynamics; per the rules this is normal for the genre and does not constitute circularity unless the physics argument itself collapses to an unverified self-citation, which it does not. Pseudogap and disorder limitations are already conceded in the text. No self-definitional loops, uniqueness theorems imported from the authors, or ansatz smuggling appear. Score 2 reflects only the minor, non-load-bearing self-citation burden inherent to a personal review.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

As a review the paper inherits the standard Hubbard/Anderson-lattice axioms and the strong-coupling expansion assumptions of the author’s earlier works; free parameters are those conventionally fitted in cuprate and heavy-fermion modeling; the only invented conceptual entity is “atomicity” for chemical bonding.

free parameters (3)
  • J/|t| ratio = 0.3
    Set to 0.3 to locate the BCS/non-BCS crossover at δc≃0.23 (Sec. 2.6.2); controls the superconducting dome shape.
  • U (Hubbard repulsion) = 8–10 eV
    Taken as 8–10 eV for Cu 3d electrons; enters both the t–J–U model and the virtual-hopping denominators.
  • hybridization V/W
    Scanned as free parameter to generate heavy-fermion phase diagrams (Figs. 9–11); not fixed by first principles.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Strong-correlation limit |tij| ≪ (U−K) permits a canonical perturbation expansion that eliminates double occupancy and yields the effective t–J Hamiltonian to second order.
    Invoked throughout Sec. 2.2–2.3 as the justification for projecting onto the lower Hubbard subspace.
  • domain assumption Projected real-space singlet operators b†ij correctly capture the pairing channel responsible for high-Tc superconductivity.
    Introduced in Eq. (2.12) and used to rewrite the effective Hamiltonian; assumed without independent microscopic derivation beyond the second-order expansion.
  • ad hoc to paper Statistically consistent Gutzwiller approximation (SGA) plus diagrammatic expansion (DE-GWF) is a controlled variational method for the t–J–U model.
    Adopted as the computational engine for all cuprate phase diagrams (Sec. 2.6); consistency conditions are internal to the author’s prior framework.
invented entities (1)
  • atomicity (as a bonding factor complementary to covalency and ionicity)
    purpose: To restore physical asymptotic behavior of the chemical bond at large interatomic distance in the exact Heitler–London solution of H2.
    Defined in Sec. 4.4; independent experimental handle is not supplied beyond the model density profiles.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Strongly correlated quantum matter: t--J model, real-space pairing, spin-dependent masses, and atomicity in chemical bond and nanosystems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HOPGQRJ2

@misc{pith2026260709465,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Strongly correlated quantum matter: t--J model, real-space pairing, spin-dependent masses, and atomicity in chemical bond and nanosystems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HOPGQRJ2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.09465}
}
read the original abstract

I critically overview my research on strongly correlated fermion systems for almost five decades. It concentrated on: (i) the first derivation of what is now called the t--J model, comprising both the limit of Anderson kinetic exchange of spin--spin interaction in the Mott--Hubbard insulator and taking into account real-space pairing, subsequently applied to high-temperature superconductivity; (ii) the concept of spin-dependent heavy mass of quasiparticles in heavy-fermion systems, and (iii) the first nontrivial model of statistical thermodynamics of the Mott--Hubbard transition. Those three features, together with the specific quantum critical phenomena provide, in my view, fundamental components of the theory of strongly correlated fermions established in the 1960s. Some related questions such as introduction of atomicity in the chemical bonding (iv), and specific properties of correlated nanosystems within the rigorous EDABI (v) approach are also briefly elaborated at the end.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09465 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: Visualization of a quantum Fermi liquid as an effective lattice gas of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Various neighboring hopping processes: a virtual hopping, b-real hopping, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The phase diagram comprising charge-density-wave (CDW) states: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (15 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Phase diagram for the full t–J–U–V model comprising both hole ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Schematic experimental ARPES results near the Fermi level in the nodal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a)-(e) Spectra for the collective magnetic excitations comprising re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Schematic representation of PAM, with bare atomic (f) and conduction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Examples of virtual hopping process contributing to the Kondo interaction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Schematic representation of the various physical regimes evolving gradually [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: a) Phase diagram involving Kondo-insulator (KI) phases, both antifer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Overall magnetic phase diagram on the plane relative (intraatomic) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Schematic illustration of the spin-subband picture of narrow band in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The metamagnetic behavior (a) and the spin-split structure in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Exemplary ARPES spectrum [62] for CeCoIn5 near the Fermi level fitted with a parabolic dispersion relations and corresponding effective masses marked (courtesy of P. Starowicz). For details see Ref. [62]. we can see, the system is of multiband character and the masses…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Flowchart describing the scheme of the EDABI method. For details see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Statistical distribution function nkσ for N = 6 − 14 hydrogen atoms ob￾tained from exact diagonalization ab initio (EDABI) method. The evolution from Fermi–Dirac like to continuous case with increasing interatomic distance a/a0 sig￾nals a gradual transformation of iti…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Variational of the ground state energy (per site) versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: The electron density profiles for H2 molecule at different interatomic dis￾tance R/a0: R = a0 (a), 1.43a0 (b), 2.3a0 (c), and 4a0 (d), obtained within the exact solution of the extended Heitler-London model [71]. A gradual separation of atoms is clearly visible and al…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    For a review see, e.g., N. F. Mott,Metal-Insulator Transitions, 2 ed., Taylor & Francis (London, 1991)

    1991

  2. [2]

    New approach to the theory of superexchange inter- actions

    P. W. Anderson, “New approach to the theory of superexchange inter- actions”, Phys. Rev.115, 2–13 (1959)

    1959

  3. [3]

    Theory of magnetic exchange interactions: exchange ininsulatorsandsemiconductors

    P. W. Anderson, “Theory of magnetic exchange interactions: exchange ininsulatorsandsemiconductors”,inSolid state physics,Vol.14,edited by F. Seitz and S. Turnbull (Elsevier, 1963), pp. 99–214

    1963

  4. [4]

    Electron correlations in narrow energy bands iii. an im- proved solution

    J. Hubbard, “Electron correlations in narrow energy bands iii. an im- proved solution”, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) S.281, 401–419 (1964)

    1964

  5. [5]

    Electron correlation and ferromagnetism of transition metals

    J. Kanamori, “Electron correlation and ferromagnetism of transition metals”, Progress of Theoretical Physics30, 275–289 (1963)

    1963

  6. [6]

    Correlation of electrons in a narrow band

    M. C. Gutzwiller, “Correlation of electrons in a narrow band”, Phys. Rev.137, A1726–A1735 (1965)

    1965

  7. [7]

    Application of gutzwiller’s varia- tional method to the metal-insulator transition

    W. F. Brinkman and T. M. Rice, “Application of gutzwiller’s varia- tional method to the metal-insulator transition”, Phys. Rev. B2, 4302– 4304 (1970)

    1970

  8. [8]

    Discontinuousmetal-insulatortran- sitions and fermi-liquid behavior of correlated electrons

    J.Spałek,A.Datta,andJ.Honig,“Discontinuousmetal-insulatortran- sitions and fermi-liquid behavior of correlated electrons”, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 728–731 (1987)

    1987

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Low-temperature proper- ties of an almost-localized fermi liquid

    J. Spałek, M. Kokowski, and J. M. Honig, “Low-temperature proper- ties of an almost-localized fermi liquid”, Phys. Rev. B39, 4175–4185 (1989)

    1989

  2. [10]

    Fermi liquid behavior and the metal-insulator transition of almost localized electrons: a brief theoretical review and an application toV 2O3 system

    J. Spałek, “Fermi liquid behavior and the metal-insulator transition of almost localized electrons: a brief theoretical review and an application toV 2O3 system”, J. of Sol. St. Chem.88, 70–93 (1990)

    1990

  3. [11]

    Properties of an almost localized fermi liquid in an applied magnetic field revisited: a statistically con- sistent gutzwiller approach

    M. M. Wysokiński and J. Spałek, “Properties of an almost localized fermi liquid in an applied magnetic field revisited: a statistically con- sistent gutzwiller approach”, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter26, 055601 (2014)

    2014

  4. [12]

    A mott in- sulator of fermionic atoms in an optical lattice

    R. Jördens, N. Strohmaier, K. Günter, H. Moritz, et al., “A mott in- sulator of fermionic atoms in an optical lattice”, Nature455, 204–207 (2008)

    2008

  5. [13]

    t-J model then and now: a personal perspective from the pioneering times

    J. Spałek, “t-J model then and now: a personal perspective from the pioneering times”, Acta Phys. Polon. A111, 409–424 (2007). 36REFERENCES

    2007

  6. [14]

    Theory of unconventional superconductivity in strongly correlatedsystems:realspacepairingandstatisticallyconsistentmean- fieldtheory-inperspective

    J. Spałek, “Theory of unconventional superconductivity in strongly correlatedsystems:realspacepairingandstatisticallyconsistentmean- fieldtheory-inperspective”,ActaPhys.Polon.A121,764–784(2012)

    2012

  7. [15]

    Brief perspective of high-temperature superconductivity in the cuprates: strong correlations combined with superexchange match experiment

    J. Spałek, “Brief perspective of high-temperature superconductivity in the cuprates: strong correlations combined with superexchange match experiment”, Acta Phys. Polon. A143, 169–179 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Density functional theory: Its origins, rise to prominence, and future

    See, e.g., R.O. Jones, "Density functional theory: Its origins, rise to prominence, and future", Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 897 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    Avella and F

    A. Avella and F. Mancini, eds.,Strongly correlated systems: numerical methods(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Mottphysicsincorrelatednanosystems:localization-delocalization transition by the exact diagonalization ab initio method

    J.Spałek,“Mottphysicsincorrelatednanosystems:localization-delocalization transition by the exact diagonalization ab initio method”, inTopol- ogy, entanglement, and strong correlations, edited by E. Pavarini and E. Koch (Forschungszentrum Jülich Zentralbibliothek, Verlag, Jülic...

    2020

  11. [19]

    P. A. M. Dirac,The principles of quantum mechanics, 4. ed., Interna- tional series of monographs on physics 27 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010), 314 pp

    2010

  12. [20]

    Raboty po kvantovoi teorii polya

    V. A. Fock, “Raboty po kvantovoi teorii polya”, , pp. 25–51 (in Rus- sian); (Izdatel’stvo Leningradskogo Universiteta, 1957); for didactical exposition see A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka,Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems(McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1971) pp.16-43

    1957

  13. [21]

    Spałek, Acta Phys

    For an early historical account see: J. Spałek, Acta Phys. Polon. A111, 409 (2007). For original detailed account see: J. Spałek, Habilitation Thesis, Jagiellonian University, Kraków (1981)

    2007

  14. [22]

    Ferromagnetism in narrow s-band with inclu- sion of intersite correlations

    J. Spałek and A. Oleś, “Ferromagnetism in narrow s-band with inclu- sion of intersite correlations”, Physica B+C86–88, 375–377 (1977)

    1977

  15. [23]

    Kinetic exchange interaction in a narrow s-band

    K. A. Chao, J. Spałek, and A. M. Oleś, “Kinetic exchange interaction in a narrow s-band”, J. of Phys. C: Solid State Physics10, L271–L276 (1977)

    1977

  16. [24]

    Canonical perturbation ex- pansion of the hubbard model

    K. A. Chao, J. Spałek, and A. M. Oleś, “Canonical perturbation ex- pansion of the hubbard model”, Phys. Rev. B18, 3453–3464 (1978)

    1978

  17. [25]

    Kinetic exchange interaction in a dou- bly degenerate narrow band and its application toF e1−xCoxS2 and Co1−xN ixS2

    J. Spałek and K. A. Chao, “Kinetic exchange interaction in a dou- bly degenerate narrow band and its application toF e1−xCoxS2 and Co1−xN ixS2”, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics13, 5241–5251 (1980)

    1980

  18. [26]

    Effect of pair hopping and magnitude of intra-atomic in- teraction on exchange-mediated superconductivity

    J. Spałek, “Effect of pair hopping and magnitude of intra-atomic in- teraction on exchange-mediated superconductivity”, Phys. Rev. B37, 533–536 (1988). REFERENCES37

    1988

  19. [27]

    Conceptofoff-diagonallong-rangeorderandthequantum phases of liquid he and of superconductors

    C.N.Yang,“Conceptofoff-diagonallong-rangeorderandthequantum phases of liquid he and of superconductors”, Rev. of Mod. Phys.34, 694–704 (1962)

    1962

  20. [28]

    Universal properties of high-temperature superconductors from real-space pairing:t–J–U model and its quantitative comparison with experiment

    J. Spałek, M. Zegrodnik, and J. Kaczmarczyk, “Universal properties of high-temperature superconductors from real-space pairing:t–J–U model and its quantitative comparison with experiment”, Phys. Rev. B95, 024506 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    Universal properties of high-temperature superconductorsfromreal-spacepairing:roleofcorrelatedhoppingand intersite coulomb interaction within thet–J–Umodel

    M. Zegrodnik and J. Spałek, “Universal properties of high-temperature superconductorsfromreal-spacepairing:roleofcorrelatedhoppingand intersite coulomb interaction within thet–J–Umodel”, Phys. Rev. B 96, 054511 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    T. Dey, M. Fidrysiak, and J. Spałek, , unpublished (2026)

    2026

  23. [31]

    Supercon- ductivity in high-Tc and related strongly correlated systems from vari- ational perspective: beyond mean field theory

    J. Spałek, M. Fidrysiak, M. Zegrodnik, and A. Biborski, “Supercon- ductivity in high-Tc and related strongly correlated systems from vari- ational perspective: beyond mean field theory”, Phys. Rep.959, 1–117 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Kaczmarczyk, J

    J. Kaczmarczyk, J. Jędrak, and J. Spałek, arXiv: 1008.0021, (unpub- lished)

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    New functional integral approach to strongly correlated fermi systems: the gutzwiller approximation as a saddle point

    G. Kotliar and A. E. Ruckenstein, “New functional integral approach to strongly correlated fermi systems: the gutzwiller approximation as a saddle point”, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 1362–1365 (1986)

    1986

  26. [34]

    Spałek and W

    For a review see: J. Spałek and W. Wójcik,Almost Localized Fermions and Mott-Hubbard Transitions at Non-Zero Temperature,inSpectroscopy of Mott Insulators and Correlated Metals, Springer Series in Solid State Sciences, Vol. 19, pp. 41–65 (1995)

    1995

  27. [35]

    Incorporationofcharge-andpair-density- wave states into the one–band model of d–wave superconductivity

    M.ZegrodnikandJ.Spałek,“Incorporationofcharge-andpair-density- wave states into the one–band model of d–wave superconductivity”, Physical Review B98, 155144 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    Biało, Ph.D

    I. Biało, Ph.D. Thesis, AGH University of Science and Technology and TU Wien, 2020 (unpublished)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Fidrysiak, M

    M. Fidrysiak, M. Zegrodnik, and J. Spałek, J. of Phys.: Condens. Mat- ter30, 475602 (2018) and Refs. therein

    2018

  30. [38]

    Fordetailedexperimentalresultsreviewsee:Hashimoto,M.andVishik, I. M. and He, R.-H. and Devereaux, T. P. and Shen, Z.-X., Nature Physics,10, 483 (2014)

    2014

  31. [39]

    Robustspinandchargeexcitationsthrough- out the high- tc cuprate phase diagram from incipient mottness

    M.FidrysiakandJ.Spałek,“Robustspinandchargeexcitationsthrough- out the high- tc cuprate phase diagram from incipient mottness”, Phys. Rev. B102, 014505 (2020). 38REFERENCES

    2020

  32. [40]

    Unified theory of spin and charge exci- tations in high–Tc cuprate superconductors: a quantitative compari- son with experiment and interpretation

    M. Fidrysiak and J. Spałek, “Unified theory of spin and charge exci- tations in high–Tc cuprate superconductors: a quantitative compari- son with experiment and interpretation”, Phys. Rev. B104, l020510 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Universal collective modes from strong electronic correlations: modified1/Nf theory with application to high– Tc cuprates

    M. Fidrysiak and J. Spałek, “Universal collective modes from strong electronic correlations: modified1/Nf theory with application to high– Tc cuprates”, Phys. Rev. B103, 165111 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Exchange-mediated pairing: gap anisotropy and a narrow-band limit for hybridized electrons

    J. Spałek and P. Gopalan, “Exchange-mediated pairing: gap anisotropy and a narrow-band limit for hybridized electrons”, Journal de Physique 50, 2869–2893 (1989)

    1989

  35. [43]

    Anderson-kondo lattice hamilto- nian from the anderson-lattice model: a modified schrieffer-wolff trans- formation and the effective exchange interactions

    E. Kądzielawa-Major and J. Spałek, “Anderson-kondo lattice hamilto- nian from the anderson-lattice model: a modified schrieffer-wolff trans- formation and the effective exchange interactions”, Acta Phys. Polon. A126, A-100-A–104 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    Antiferromagnetic heavy-fermion and kondo-insulating states with compensated magnetic moments

    R. Doradziński and J. Spałek, “Antiferromagnetic heavy-fermion and kondo-insulating states with compensated magnetic moments”, Phys. Rev. B56, R14239–R14242 (1997)

    1997

  37. [45]

    Mean-field magnetic phase diagram of the periodic anderson model with the kondo-compensated phases

    R. Doradziński and J. Spałek, “Mean-field magnetic phase diagram of the periodic anderson model with the kondo-compensated phases”, Phys. Rev. B58, 3293–3301 (1998)

    1998

  38. [46]

    Spałek and R

    J. Spałek and R. Doradziński, in Magnetism and electronic correlations in local-moment systems: rare-earth elements and compounds, edited by M. Donath, P. A. Dowben, and W. Nolting (1998), pp. 387–405

    1998

  39. [47]

    Anderson lattice with explicit kondo cou- pling revisited: metamagnetism and the field-induced suppression of the heavy fermion state

    O. Howczak and J. Spałek, “Anderson lattice with explicit kondo cou- pling revisited: metamagnetism and the field-induced suppression of the heavy fermion state”, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter24, 205602 (2012)

    2012

  40. [48]

    Superconductivity in the presence of strong pauli paramagnetism:CeCu2Si2

    F. Steglich, J. Aarts, C. D. Bredl, W. Lieke, et al., “Superconductivity in the presence of strong pauli paramagnetism:CeCu2Si2”, Physical Review Letters43, 1892–1896 (1979)

    1979

  41. [49]

    4f-virtual-bound-state formation inCeAl 3 at low temperatures

    K. Andres, J. E. Graebner, and H. R. Ott, “4f-virtual-bound-state formation inCeAl 3 at low temperatures”, Phys. Rev. Lett.35, 1779– 1782 (1975)

    1975

  42. [50]

    Howczak, Ph.D

    O. Howczak, Ph.D. Thesis, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, 2012

    2012

  43. [51]

    Microscopic model of hybrid pairing: a common approach to heavy-fermion and high-Tc superconductivity

    J. Spałek, “Microscopic model of hybrid pairing: a common approach to heavy-fermion and high-Tc superconductivity”, Phys. Rev. B38, 208–212 (1988). REFERENCES39

    1988

  44. [52]

    Superconduc- tivity in the three-band model of cuprates: variational wave function study and relation to the single-band case

    M.Zegrodnik,A.Biborski,M.Fidrysiak,andJ.Spałek,“Superconduc- tivity in the three-band model of cuprates: variational wave function study and relation to the single-band case”, Phys. Rev. B99, 104511 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    Almost-localized electrons in a magnetic field

    J. Spałek and P. Gopalan, “Almost-localized electrons in a magnetic field”, Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 2823–2826 (1990)

    1990

  46. [54]

    Spin-splitmasses and metamagnetic behavior of almost-localized fermions

    P.Korbel,J.Spałek,W.Wójcik,andM.Acquarone,“Spin-splitmasses and metamagnetic behavior of almost-localized fermions”, Phys. Rev. B52, R2213–R2216 (1995)

    1995

  47. [55]

    Magnetic properties of almost localized fermions revisited: spin dependent masses and quantum critical behavior

    J. Spałek, “Magnetic properties of almost localized fermions revisited: spin dependent masses and quantum critical behavior”, Physica Status Solidi (b)243, 78–88 (2006)

    2006

  48. [56]

    Spin-split masses and a critical behavior of almost local- ized narrow-band and heavy-fermion systems

    J. Spałek, “Spin-split masses and a critical behavior of almost local- ized narrow-band and heavy-fermion systems”, Physica B: Condensed Matter378–380, 654–660 (2006)

    2006

  49. [57]

    High magnetic field study ofCeP d2Si2

    I. Sheikin, A. Gröger, S. Raymond, D. Jaccard, et al., “High magnetic field study ofCeP d2Si2”, Phys. Rev. B67, 094420 (2003)

    2003

  50. [58]

    Anoma- lous de Haas–van Alphen oscillations inCeCoIn5

    A. McCollam, S. R. Julian, P. M. C. Rourke, D. Aoki, et al., “Anoma- lous de Haas–van Alphen oscillations inCeCoIn5”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 186401 (2005)

    2005

  51. [59]

    Anomalous changeinthedeHaas—vanAlphenoscillationsofCeCoIn 5 atultralow temperatures

    H. Shishido, S. Yamada, K. Sugii, M. Shimozawa, et al., “Anomalous changeinthedeHaas—vanAlphenoscillationsofCeCoIn 5 atultralow temperatures”, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 177201 (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    Truncated massdivergenceinamottmetal

    K. Semeniuk, H. Chang, J. Baglo, S. Friedemann, et al., “Truncated massdivergenceinamottmetal”,ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademy of Sciences120,10.1073/pnas.2301456120(2023)

    2023 doi

  53. [61]

    Kondo-lattice in an applied mag- netic field: spin-split masses and metamagnetism

    R. Citro, A. Romano, and J. Spałek, “Kondo-lattice in an applied mag- netic field: spin-split masses and metamagnetism”, Physica B: Con- densed Matter259–261, 213–214 (1999)

    1999

  54. [62]

    Photoemission signature of momentum-dependent hybridization inCeCoIn5

    R. Kurleto, M. Fidrysiak, L. Nicolaï, J. Minár, et al., “Photoemission signature of momentum-dependent hybridization inCeCoIn5”, Phys. Rev. B104, 125104 (2021)

    2021

  55. [63]

    Spałek, P

    J. Spałek, P. Kuterba, M. Wójcik, et al., in preparation. (2026)

    2026

  56. [64]

    Pavarini et al., Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich, Vol

    See, e.g.,Dynamical Mean-Field Theory of Correlated Electrons, edited by E. Pavarini et al., Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich, Vol. 12 (2022). 40REFERENCES

    2022

  57. [65]

    Hendzel, P

    M. Hendzel, P. Kuterba, J. Spałek, Role of Kinetic Exchange and Coulomb Interaction in Bonding of Hydrogen Molecular Systems and Excited States, Acta Phys. Pol. B 57, 5-A18 (2026), this issue

    2026

  58. [66]

    Lieb-Wu solution, gutzwiller- wave-function, and gutzwiller-ansatz approximations with adjustable single-particle wave function for the hubbard chain

    J. Kurzyk, J. Spałek, and W. Wójcik, “Lieb-Wu solution, gutzwiller- wave-function, and gutzwiller-ansatz approximations with adjustable single-particle wave function for the hubbard chain”, Acta Phys. Polon. A111, 603–618 (2007)

    2007

  59. [67]

    Extended hubbard model with renormalized wannier wave functions in the correlated state: beyond the parametrized models

    J. Kurzyk, W. Wójcik, and J. Spałek, “Extended hubbard model with renormalized wannier wave functions in the correlated state: beyond the parametrized models”, Eur. Phys. J. B66, 385–398 (2008)

    2008

  60. [68]

    Extended hub- bard model with the renormalized wannier wave functions in the cor- related state ii: quantum critical scaling of the wave function near the mott-hubbard transition

    J. Spałek, J. Kurzyk, R. Podsiadły, and W. Wójcik, “Extended hub- bard model with the renormalized wannier wave functions in the cor- related state ii: quantum critical scaling of the wave function near the mott-hubbard transition”, Eur. Phys. J. B74, 63–74 (2010)

    2010

  61. [69]

    Absence of mott transition in an exact solution of the short-range, one-band model in one dimension

    E. H. Lieb and F. Y. Wu, “Absence of mott transition in an exact solution of the short-range, one-band model in one dimension”, Phys. Rev. Lett.20, 1445–1448 (1968)

    1968

  62. [70]

    The one-dimensional hubbard model: a remi- niscence

    E. H. Lieb and F. Wu, “The one-dimensional hubbard model: a remi- niscence”, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications321, 1–27 (2003)

    2003

  63. [71]

    Toward complementary characterizationofthechemicalbond

    M. Hendzel, M. Fidrysiak, and J. Spałek, “Toward complementary characterizationofthechemicalbond”,J.Phys.Chem.Lett.13,10261– 10266 (2022)

    2022

  64. [72]

    The com- bined exact diagonalization–ab initio approach and its application to correlatedelectronicstatesandMott–Hubbardlocalizationinnanoscopic systems

    J. Spałek, E. M. Görlich, A. Rycerz, and R. Zahorbeński, “The com- bined exact diagonalization–ab initio approach and its application to correlatedelectronicstatesandMott–Hubbardlocalizationinnanoscopic systems”, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter19, 255212 (2007)

    2007

  65. [73]

    Interparticle correlations and chemical bonding from physical side: covalency vs atomicity and ionicity

    E. Brocławik, M. Fidrysiak, M. Hendzel, and J. Spałek, “Interparticle correlations and chemical bonding from physical side: covalency vs atomicity and ionicity”, inPolish quantum chemistry from kołos to now(Elsevier, 2023), pp. 351–373

    2023

  66. [74]

    Fidrysiak, Fermiology, Charge Transfer Energy, and Robust Para- magnons in high-Tc Cuprate Superconductors, Acta Phys

    M. Fidrysiak, Fermiology, Charge Transfer Energy, and Robust Para- magnons in high-Tc Cuprate Superconductors, Acta Phys. Pol. B 57, 5-A14 (2026), this issue

    2026

  67. [75]

    Spałek et al., A Nonstandard Statistics for Strongly Correlated Sys- tems: Two Simple Examples, Acta Phys

    J. Spałek et al., A Nonstandard Statistics for Strongly Correlated Sys- tems: Two Simple Examples, Acta Phys. Pol. B 57, 5-A16 (2026), this issue

    2026

  68. [76]

    Spałek and M

    J. Spałek and M. Hendzel, in preparation (2026)

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed July 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.