Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 203 references

The Azahar Project: Non-Thermal Physics Drives Star Formation Burstiness and the Evolution of the UV Luminosity Density at Cosmic Dawn

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Simulations with on-the-fly radiation, cosmic rays, and magnetic fields — not boosted supernova feedback — reproduce the UV luminosity function from z≈14 to z≈3 via burstier star formation and ejective-to-preventive outflows.

desk verdict A valuable first large-volume RT+CR+MHD cosmological simulation result whose central causal claim is plausible but not yet isolated from the reduced thermal/kinetic SN budget. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.15344 v1 pith:Z3WGENQW submitted 2026-07-16 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

Sergio Martin-Alvarez , Risa H. Wechsler , Debora Sijacki This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.CO
keywords cosmicraysgalaxyformationhigh-redshiftgalaxieshydrodynamicalsimulationsmagnetohydrodynamicsradiativetransferreionizationstarburstiness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that cosmological simulations miss the bright, abundant galaxies JWST sees at cosmic dawn because they omit non-thermal feedback channels. It presents the first results of the Azahar suite, zooming in on three models: standard hydrodynamics, hydrodynamics with four-times-boosted supernova energy, and a ‘Non-Thermal’ model that runs radiative transfer, cosmic rays, and magnetic fields on the fly. The Non-Thermal model alone reproduces the observed UV luminosity function from z≈14 to z≈3, the stellar mass function, the star-forming main sequence, and gas metallicities, without tuning any non-thermal parameter. It does so by making star formation burstier and by shifting galaxy outflows from ejective at high redshift to preventive at cosmic noon as cosmic-ray pressure builds up. If the claim holds, JWST’s surprisingly bright early galaxies are not a puzzle for theory but a signature that radiation and cosmic rays regulate the first galaxies.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the Non-Thermal galaxy formation model: a ~20 pc resolution zoom-in cosmological setup that couples moment-based radiative transfer, a diffusive cosmic-ray fluid, and constrained-transport magnetohydrodynamics to a magneto-thermo-turbulent star formation prescription. Cosmic rays receive 10% of each 10^51 erg supernova and diffuse with a constant coefficient (3×10^28 cm²/s); magnetic fields receive 1%; the rest goes to thermal and kinetic channels. Radiation suppresses star formation on short (~Myr) timescales, while cosmic rays build up a smooth, sustained pressure that supports the ISM and drives temperate outflows. Together they produce bursty, self-regulated g

What would settle it

Run a control simulation identical to Non-Thermal but with cosmic-ray and magnetic-field injection disabled while keeping the supernova energy split and all numerical parameters fixed; if that control still matches the UV luminosity function and burstiness from z≈14 to z≈3, the paper’s causal story is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a galaxy formation model with radiative transfer, cosmic-ray hydrodynamics, and magnetic fields running on the fly — the Non-Thermal model — simultaneously matches the observed UV luminosity function from z≈14 to z≈3, the stellar mass function, the star-forming main sequence, and gas-phase metallicities, while standard hydrodynamics overproduces stars and boosted-supernova feedback suppresses early star formation too strongly. The model achieves this through two linked mechanisms: star formation becomes burstier on both long and short timescales, and outflows shift from ejective at high redshift to preventive at cosmic noon as cosmic-ray pressure accumulates in the

Load-bearing premise

The paper attributes the success of its Non-Thermal model to radiation, cosmic rays, and magnetic fields, but that run also gives each supernova less energy to thermal and kinetic channels, and the authors have not yet run a control that separates those two changes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the Non-Thermal result is correct, JWST’s abundant bright galaxies at z>10 arise naturally from bursty, self-regulated star formation rather than requiring new cosmology or extreme feedback-free starbursts.
  • Calibrated boosted-supernova models are disfavored: their outflows remain too ejective at z≈3, over-suppressing star formation and leaving galaxies too metal-poor.
  • Star formation burstiness, measured by the 3-to-50 Myr SFR ratio, becomes a discriminating observable, consistent with current JWST samples and predicted to decrease toward higher stellar mass and lower redshift.
  • The neutral-gas energy budget shifts from thermal to cosmic-ray pressure after z≈7, implying that cosmic rays become a primary ISM support channel in galaxies by cosmic noon.
  • The model predicts a distinctive CGM/IGM signature: smoother Lyα absorption and shallower metal concentration profiles than either standard or calibrated feedback, while preserving filament coherence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves open whether the results are caused by non-thermal physics per se or by the 11% reduction in thermal/kinetic supernova energy; a control run with the same energy split but without cosmic-ray and magnetic injection would settle this.
  • If the ejective-to-preventive transition is real, it should be visible in individual galaxy trajectories — outflow mass loading should decline along merger-free evolutionary tracks, not only in population medians.
  • A testable extension: comparing the B_3/50 burstiness diagnostic with Hα and UV photometry of hundreds of JWST galaxies at z≈6–10 could falsify the timescale structure of the feedback model.
  • The same runs predict LyC photon escape that varies with burst phase, linking the UVLF match to reionization and giving an independent observational probe of non-thermal feedback.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents the Azahar suite of high-resolution zoom-in cosmological simulations and compares three models: Standard HD, Calibrated HD (boosted thermal SN feedback), and Non-Thermal (MHD + radiative transfer + cosmic rays on the fly). The central claim is that non-thermal feedback channels produce burstier star formation, drive a transition from ejective to preventive outflows as cosmic-ray pressure builds up, and thereby reproduce the observed UV luminosity function from z~14 to z~3, along with the SFRD, stellar mass function, main sequence, and mass-metallicity relation. The authors argue that simple boosted thermal SN feedback cannot simultaneously match the early and late galaxy populations seen by JWST.

Significance. If the causal claim holds, this is a significant result: a largely uncalibrated model with radiative transfer, cosmic rays, and magnetic fields would naturally explain JWST's bright high-redshift galaxies without artificially boosted thermal feedback. The paper's strengths include a large (~20 pc, ~12 cMpc)^3 sample, a wide set of observational diagnostics, and an explicit, honest treatment of volume and overlap uncertainties. The non-thermal parameters (f_CR, kappa_CR, f_mag) are not fitted to the target observables, which is a genuine methodological strength. However, the central attribution to non-thermal physics is not yet isolated from a simultaneous change in the thermal/kinetic SN energy budget, and the high-redshift UVLF claim is stated more strongly in the abstract than the volume/overlap limitations in the text justify.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.1.4, Table 1, §3.3, §4] The causal claim is confounded: Non-Thermal changes two things relative to Standard HD—it enables RT/CR/MHD and reduces the thermal+kinetic SN energy budget from 100% to ~89% (10% CR, 1% magnetic). No control run has the same reduced thermal+kinetic budget with all non-thermal channels disabled, and no sensitivity study varies f_CR or kappa_CR. The paper itself states in §3.3 that 'the specific influence of each non-thermal component will be systematically addressed in future work.' As written, the conclusion 'non-thermal physics drives' could instead reflect the energy split or the adopted CR transport parameters. A control run and/or parameter variations, or a substantially softened causal claim, are needed.
  2. [§3.2.1, Fig. 3, footnote 8] The abstract claims the model reproduces the observed UV luminosity function from z~14, but at z>=12.5 the simulated volume primarily samples M_UV ≳ -18, only partially overlapping current JWST measurements. The text explicitly says the faint-end slopes at these redshifts are 'rough estimates' and that the comparison 'focuses on the relative model behavior rather than on the agreement with observations.' The quantitative match at z~14 is therefore not established at the same level as at z~6–3. Please either restrict the high-z claim in the abstract/conclusions or add a JWST-like selection/overlap analysis that makes the comparison direct.
  3. [§2.1.5, §3.4] The non-thermal parameters are fixed to literature values, but the paper's quantitative predictions—especially the cosmic-ray pressure buildup and the ejective-to-preventive outflow transition in §3.4—may be sensitive to choices such as kappa_CR = 3e28 cm^2/s and f_CR = 0.1. No sensitivity runs are shown. Given that these parameters directly control the strength and propagation of cosmic-ray feedback, a variation over the observationally plausible range is needed to demonstrate that the mechanism, rather than the specific parameter values, is responsible for the reported behavior.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to the 'full-physics model' while the rest of the paper uses 'Non-Thermal' for the same model. Please make the naming consistent.
  2. [Appendix C] Equation (C2) is labeled C2 but there is no Equation (C1) in the appendix; renumber or add the missing equation.
  3. [§3.3] The text references 'thesan-zoom'; the simulation name should be typeset consistently as 'Thesan-zoom' or similar italic style.
  4. [Fig. 3 caption] Minor typographical spacing issues in the caption (e.g., 'Calibrated HD' appears without spaces in a few places); a proofread pass is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Non-Thermal model's parameters are fixed from independent constraints, and the headline comparisons are external benchmarks rather than fitted targets.

full rationale

The Azahar Non-Thermal simulation is not calibrated to the observed UVLF, stellar mass function, SFRD, main sequence, outflow loading, or metallicities that are used as evidence. Section 2.1.5 states: "none of the non-thermal parameter values described were adjusted to match galaxy property observables; their values are instead motivated by independent observational, theoretical, or numerical constraints," with f_CR = 0.1, kappa_CR = 3e28 cm^2/s, and f_mag = 0.01 tied to external cosmic-ray, supernova-remnant, and magnetic-field constraints. The model is then compared against independent JWST and ground-based datasets (Figs. 3-6, 8, 10, 12); success or failure is not encoded in the model construction. The Calibrated HD model is the only run tuned to a target, and the paper explicitly acknowledges that its z=3 GSMF agreement is "by construction" rather than a prediction. Self-citations (Pandora papers, Dome et al.) appear in motivation and consistency checks, but the central derivation—running an uncalibrated, parameter-fixed model against external benchmarks—does not reduce to those citations. The paper's own admission that "the specific influence of each non-thermal component will be systematically addressed in future work" and the absence of a control run with the same reduced thermal/kinetic SN budget but without RT/CR/MHD weaken the causal attribution to non-thermal physics, but this is a confounded-experiment/correctness concern, not a definitional or fitted-input circularity. No equation or parameter is equivalent to the claimed prediction by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a large set of sub-grid physical prescriptions and parameter choices. The most important free parameters are the SN energy split (f_CR, f_mag), the CR diffusion coefficient, the seed magnetic field, and the reduced speed of light; none are fitted to the target observables, but no sensitivity analysis is provided. No new physical entities beyond well-established processes (radiation, CRs, magnetic fields) are invoked.

free parameters (6)
  • SN feedback boost α_SN (Calibrated HD) = 4.0
    Calibrated to reproduce the galaxy stellar mass function at z=3; the comparison model's early-Universe behavior is therefore partially constructed from later-time data.
  • CR energy fraction f_CR = 0.1
    Fixed fraction of SN energy injected into cosmic rays; chosen from observational estimates, but is a free input whose value controls CR pressure buildup and the ejective-to-preventive transition.
  • CR diffusion coefficient κ_CR = 3e28 cm^2/s
    Constant isotropic diffusion coefficient from Milky Way gamma-ray constraints; no dependence on plasma environment; directly shapes CR confinement and outflow transition redshift.
  • SN magnetic energy fraction f_mag = 0.01
    SN-injected magnetic energy fraction, chosen to reproduce SN-remnant magnetization; affects magnetic pressure support and star formation efficiency via the MTT prescription.
  • Initial magnetic field B0 = 3e-20 G
    Weak seed field meant to mimic a Biermann battery; its value controls early magnetic amplification timescales in the ISM.
  • Reduced speed of light c~ = 0.01c
    Numerical speed limit for radiative transfer; known to affect ionization front propagation and escape fractions in galaxy simulations.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Planck 2016 cosmology and initial conditions generated with MUSIC at z=127.
    The simulation box and zoom region are set up under this cosmology; all derived statistics assume it.
  • domain assumption Star formation follows the magneto-thermo-turbulent (MTT) prescription with local efficiency from turbulent and magnetic pressure.
    The burstiness and star formation rates depend critically on this sub-grid model.
  • domain assumption Mechanical SN feedback with Kroupa IMF, E_SN=1e51 erg, and fixed mass/metal return fractions.
    Supernova feedback is the primary driver of outflows and CR/magnetic injection; the implementation follows Kimm & Cen.
  • domain assumption Radiative transfer solved with a moment method using three hydrogen/helium ionization bins, bpass v2.0 spectra, and reduced speed of light.
    Ionizing radiation is a key early feedback channel; the reduced speed of light and spectral treatment affect when and how radiation regulates star formation.
  • domain assumption Cosmic rays modeled as a single-fluid energy-density component with constant isotropic diffusion and no streaming.
    The claimed CR pressure buildup and ejective-to-preventive transition rely on this transport treatment.
  • domain assumption Haardt & Madau UV background switched on at z=9.
    The UV background affects cooling, heating, and photoionization, especially at later redshifts.
  • domain assumption Effective volume estimated by matching the simulated halo mass function to Sheth-Tormen.
    All number-density statistics (UVLF, GSMF, SFRD) use this volume estimate; its systematic uncertainty is folded into error bands.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Azahar Project: Non-Thermal Physics Drives Star Formation Burstiness and the Evolution of the UV Luminosity Density at Cosmic Dawn." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z3WGENQW

@misc{pith2026260715344,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Azahar Project: Non-Thermal Physics Drives Star Formation Burstiness and the Evolution of the UV Luminosity Density at Cosmic Dawn},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z3WGENQW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15344}
}
abstract

JWST observations, which have pushed the discovery and characterization of galaxies to cosmic dawn, have revealed significant deficiencies in state-of-the-art galaxy formation simulations, motivating the need for novel, physically grounded models. We present the first results from the Azahar suite of ten high-resolution ($\sim$20 pc), large-volume zoom-in cosmological simulations, which follow the formation of thousands of galaxies and progressively incorporate radiative transfer (RT), cosmic rays (CRs), and magnetohydrodynamics in addition to the 'standard' baryonic physics. Our Non-Thermal model, which simultaneously includes RT and CRs on the fly, reproduces the observed UV luminosity function from high redshifts ($z \sim 14$) to cosmic noon ($z \sim 3$), as well as the evolution of the stellar mass function, the galaxy main sequence, and observed gas metallicities. It does so through a combination of burstier star formation, with enhanced variability on both long ($\gtrsim 50$ Myr) and short ($\lesssim 10$ Myr) timescales, and a transition from high to low outflow mass-loading factors over cosmic time as CR pressure builds up in the ISM. We find that simple (boosted) thermal SN feedback models fail to capture the cosmic evolution of the very first galaxies because they lack realistic feedback channels that operate on different timescales and have distinct thermodynamical properties, thereby either overproducing stellar mass or driving overly explosive outflows. Our results indicate that non-thermal galaxy formation physics is crucial for providing a robust theoretical framework with which to interpret the high-redshift galaxy populations now being uncovered by JWST.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15344 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (Top panel) Projected view showing part of the high-resolution sub-volume (8 cMpc × 3 cMpc × 8 cMpc) for our Non-Thermal model. Colors show the neutral hydrogen (blue), ionized hydrogen (grey), stellar surface density (white), and ionized radiation (orange for low and purple for high energy) densities. Galaxies appear as bright knots across the cosmic web, with the inter-galactic space permeated by Lyman-continuum r… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of our three illustrative simulations. From top to bottom models are standard hydrodynamics (Stan￾dard HD), calibrated hydrodynamics (Calibrated HD), and Non-Thermal. (Left column) Colors show total gas density (blue/purple), high temperature gas (orange), and stellar surface density (white). Galaxy outflows are very different across models, with Calibrated HD producing much hotter and extended galactic w… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. UVLF evolution for Standard HD (blue), Calibrated HD (red), and Non-Thermal (green) with recent observational constraints. Redshift decreases from top to bottom, spanning z = 14, 12.5, 11 (left) and z = 10, 6, 3 (right). Shaded bands combine Poisson noise, cosmic variance, and volume uncertainty. Observations are shown as grey open data points. Left panels and top right panel show functional fits from Whitler et al.… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Evolution of the cosmic star formation rate den￾sity as inferred from the UV luminosity density. We compare Standard HD (blue), Calibrated HD (red), and Non-Thermal (green) models with various observational estimates (grey data points). Error bands are estimated as for…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Galaxy stellar mass function at z = 10 (top), z = 6 (center), and z = 3 (bottom) for our Standard HD (blue), Calibrated HD (red), and Non-Thermal (green) mod￾els. Error bands are computed as for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Galaxy main sequence of star-forming galaxies at z = 10 (top left), z = 6 (top right), and z = 3 (bottom) comparing our simulations with observational data (grey points), and empirical predictions (purple). Shaded bands display the 2 σ variance of our measurements acro…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Star formation burstiness (defined as the spectral variance integrated across four characteristic timescale bands; see text) for galaxies with stellar mass M∗(z = 3) > 5×107 M⊙, separated for each of the three sim￾ulations. Error bars show the 1 σ variance across the f…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Burstiness parameter B3/50 = SFR3 Myr/ SFR50 Myr (Hα/UV analogue; see Appendix D for the 10/100 Myr defini￾tion, which yields consistent results). We show B3/50 as a function of stellar mass at z = 10 (top left), z = 6 (top right), and z = 3 (bottom) for our standard h…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Fractional contribution of thermal (fth, red), cosmic ray (fcr, green), and magnetic (fmag, purple) en￾ergy to the energy balance of the H i gas as a function of redshift, for galaxies in the Non-Thermal model with 5×107 ≤ M∗ ≤ 109 M⊙. Lines show the median, and shaded…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Ionized gas outflow mass-loading factor as a function of stellar mass at z = 10 (top left), z = 6 (top right), and z = 3 (bottom) for the Standard HD (blue), Calibrated HD (red), and Non-Thermal (green) models, compared with observational estimates (grey). Lines are s…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Maps of the metal mass surface density (left panels, ΣZ) and Lyα optical depth measured over fixed line-of-sight scales (right panels, τLyα). Panels display the same cosmological region as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: WIM gas mass-metallicity relation at z = 10 (top), z = 6 (center), and z = 3 (bottom), comparing the three simulations (Standard HD in blue, Calibrated HD in red, and Non-Thermal in green) with observational data (grey). Shaded bands correspond to the 1 σ galaxy distr…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Comparison of the three volume estimation methods for the Standard HD (blue), Calibrated HD (red), and Non-Thermal (green) simulations. Black lines show the combined estimate for each of the methods: HMF (solid lines), dark matter halos convex hull (dashed lines), and…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Power spectrum of the in-situ SFHs for the three simulations, showing the median variance per logarith￾mic frequency interval, ν Pfrac, as a function of frequency ν, where Pfrac denotes the PSD of the fractional SFH variabil￾ity. The spectrum corresponds to galaxies w…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Comparison of burstiness measurements us￾ing different SFR timescales. Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_15.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Lyα optical depth per ∆s = 50 kpc for the Non-Thermal simulation at z = 3, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Comparison of the mass-metallicity relation shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_18.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

203 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L., & Norman, M

    Abel, T., Bryan, G. L., & Norman, M. L. 2002, Science, 295, 93, doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.1063991

    doi:10.1126/science.1063991 2002

  2. [2]

    2012, ApJ, 755, 164, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/755/2/164

    Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., Allafort, A., et al. 2012, ApJ, 755, 164, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/755/2/164

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/755/2/164 2012

  3. [3]

    V., Leitner, S

    Agertz, O., Kravtsov, A. V., Leitner, S. N., & Gnedin, N. Y. 2013, ApJ, 770, 25, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/25

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/25 2013

  4. [4]

    P., Mac Low, M

    Andersson, E. P., Mac Low, M. M., Agertz, O., Renaud, F., & Li, H. 2024, A&A, 681, A28, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347792

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347792 2024

  5. [5]

    C., & Jiang, Y.-F

    Armillotta, L., Ostriker, E. C., & Jiang, Y.-F. 2021, ApJ, 922, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/AC1DB2

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1db2 2021

  6. [6]

    2023, MNRAS, 527, 11372, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAD3902

    Asada, Y., Sawicki, M., Abraham, R., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 527, 11372, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAD3902

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3902 2023

  7. [7]

    2021, MNRAS, 504, 2346, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1030

    Attia, O., Teyssier, R., Katz, H., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 504, 2346, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1030

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1030 2021

  8. [8]

    2004, MNRAS, 352, 376, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07883.x

    Aubert, D., Pichon, C., & Colombi, S. 2004, MNRAS, 352, 376, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07883.x

    arXiv 2004

Show all 203 references
  1. [9]

    H., Hearin, A

    Behroozi, P., Wechsler, R. H., Hearin, A. P., & Conroy, C. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 3143, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1182

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    2026, A&A, 707, A396, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557901

    Paladino, R. 2026, A&A, 707, A396, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557901

    2026 doi

  3. [11]

    J., Illingworth, G

    Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 803, 34, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/803/1/34

    2015 doi

  4. [12]

    J., Aravena, M., Decarli, R., et al

    Bouwens, R. J., Aravena, M., Decarli, R., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 72, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/72

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    J., Oesch, P

    Bouwens, R. J., Oesch, P. A., Stefanon, M., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ABF83E

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 731, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01937-7

    Boylan-Kolchin, M. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 731, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01937-7

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    H., et al

    Brauer, K., Mead, J., Wise, J. H., et al. 2025, ApJ, 993, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae06a4

    2025 doi

  8. [16]

    L., & Norman, M

    Bryan, G. L., & Norman, M. L. 1998, ApJ, 495, 80, doi: 10.1086/305262

    1998 doi

  9. [17]

    S., & Quinn, T

    Butsky, I. S., & Quinn, T. R. 2018, ApJ, 868, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaeac2

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    M., Stanway, E

    Byrne, C. M., Stanway, E. R., Eldridge, J. J., McSwiney, L., & Townsend, O. T. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 5329, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAC807

    2022 doi

  11. [19]

    P., et al

    Cadiou, C., Katz, H., Rey, M. P., et al. 2025, arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.05667

    2025

  12. [20]

    C., Engelbracht, C

    Calzetti, D., Kennicutt, R. C., Engelbracht, C. W., et al. 2007, ApJ, 666, 870, doi: 10.1086/520082

    2007 doi

  13. [21]

    2024, A&A, 685, A99, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347230

    Carniani, S., Venturi, G., Parlanti, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A99, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347230

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    2025, A&A, 704, A290, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556471

    Carvajal-Bohorquez, C., Ciesla, L., Laporte, N., et al. 2025, A&A, 704, A290, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556471

    2025 doi

  15. [23]

    2026, MNRAS, 548, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAG740

    Chaikin, E., Schaye, J., Schaller, M., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 548, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAG740

    2026 doi

  16. [24]

    2024, ApJL, 976, L15, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/AD8DC9

    Chemerynska, I., Atek, H., Dayal, P., et al. 2024, ApJL, 976, L15, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/AD8DC9

    2024 doi

  17. [25]

    J., et al

    Chemerynska, I., Atek, H., Furtak, L. J., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 546, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAF2267

    2026 doi

  18. [26]

    E., Mead, A

    Chisari, N. E., Mead, A. J., Joudaki, S., et al. 2019, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 2, 9452, doi: 10.21105/astro.1905.06082

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    2018, MNRAS, 481, 1690, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STY2380

    Chisholm, J., Tremonti, C., & Leitherer, C. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 1690, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STY2380

    2018 doi

  20. [28]

    A., Leitherer, C., & Chen, Y

    Chisholm, J., Tremonti, C. A., Leitherer, C., & Chen, Y. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 4831, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1164

    2017 doi

  21. [29]

    R., Kereˇ s, D., Hopkins, P

    Choban, C. R., Kereˇ s, D., Hopkins, P. F., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 4506, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAC1542

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    E., Lam, N., et al

    Clarke, L., Shapley, A. E., Lam, N., et al. 2025, arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.06681

    2025

  23. [31]

    W., Papovich, C., Finkelstein, S

    Cole, J. W., Papovich, C., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 979, 193, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/AD9A6A

    2025 doi

  24. [32]

    2022, MNRAS, 513, 2535, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1026

    Concas, A., Maiolino, R., Curti, M., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 2535, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1026

    2022 doi

  25. [33]

    A., Schaye, J., Bower, R

    Crain, R. A., Schaye, J., Bower, R. G., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 1937, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv725

    2015 doi

  26. [34]

    C., Stone, E

    Cummings, A. C., Stone, E. C., Heikkila, B. C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 831, 18, doi: 10.3847/0004-637x/831/1/18

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    2020, MNRAS, 492, 821, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3379

    Curti, M., Maiolino, R., Cirasuolo, M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 821, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3379

    2020 doi

  28. [36]

    2022, MNRAS, 518, 425, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAC2737

    Curti, M., D’Eugenio, F., Carniani, S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 518, 425, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAC2737

    2022 doi

  29. [37]

    2024, A&A, 684, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346698

    Curti, M., Maiolino, R., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346698

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    2025, ApJ, 980, 197, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ADAB72

    Lopez-Rodriguez, E. 2025, ApJ, 980, 197, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ADAB72

    2025 doi

  31. [39]

    L., Tacchella, S., ¨Ubler, H., et al

    Danhaive, A. L., Tacchella, S., ¨Ubler, H., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 543, 3249, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1540 Bursty First Galaxies in the Azahar Simulations29

    2025 doi

  32. [40]

    2020, A&A, 638, A123, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936339 Dav´ e, R., Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., Narayanan, D., et al

    Dashyan, G., & Dubois, Y. 2020, A&A, 638, A123, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936339 Dav´ e, R., Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., Narayanan, D., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 2827, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STZ937

    2020 doi

  33. [41]

    2017, A&A, 605, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730419

    Davidzon, I., Ilbert, O., Laigle, C., et al. 2017, A&A, 605, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730419

    2017 doi

  34. [42]

    2023, MNRAS, 523, 3201, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAD1557

    Li, Z. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 3201, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAD1557

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    2024, A&A, 691, A231, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450699

    Deng, Y., Li, H., Liu, B., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A231, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450699

    2024 doi

  36. [44]

    2018, ApJS, 239, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/AAEE8C

    Diemer, B. 2018, ApJS, 239, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/AAEE8C

    2018 doi

  37. [45]

    2025, MNRAS, 537, 629, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAF006

    Sijacki, D. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 629, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAF006

    2025 doi

  38. [46]

    T., McLure, R

    Donnan, C. T., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 3222, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAE2037

    2024 doi

  39. [47]

    2016, A&A, 585, A138, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527126

    Dubois, Y., & Commer¸ con, B. 2016, A&A, 585, A138, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527126

    2016 doi

  40. [48]

    2019, A&A, 631, A121, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936275

    Dubois, Y., Commer¸ con, B., Marcowith, A., & Brahimi, L. 2019, A&A, 631, A121, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936275

    2019 doi

  41. [49]

    2014, MNRAS, 444, 1453, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1227

    Dubois, Y., Pichon, C., Welker, C., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 1453, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1227

    2014 doi

  42. [50]

    2021, A&A, 651, A109, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039429

    Dubois, Y., Beckmann, R., Bournaud, F., et al. 2021, A&A, 651, A109, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039429

    2021 doi

  43. [51]

    2024, A&A, 687, A240, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449784

    Dubois, Y., Rodr ´ ıguez Montero, F., Guerra, C., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A240, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449784

    2024 doi

  44. [52]

    1992, MNRAS, 256, 43P, doi: 10.1093/mnras/256.1.43P

    Efstathiou, G. 1992, MNRAS, 256, 43P, doi: 10.1093/mnras/256.1.43P

    1992 doi

  45. [54]

    2025, ApJ, 987, 189, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/addc74

    Whitler, L. 2025, ApJ, 987, 189, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/addc74

    2025 doi

  46. [55]

    P., Whitler, L., et al

    Endsley, R., Stark, D. P., Whitler, L., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 2312, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1919

    2023 doi

  47. [56]

    P., Whitler, L., et al

    Endsley, R., Stark, D. P., Whitler, L., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 1111, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAE1857

    2024 doi

  48. [57]

    Bushby, P. J. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 5065, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2084

    2019 doi

  49. [58]

    Larson, K. L. 2019, ApJ, 884, 133, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/AB425B

    2019 doi

  50. [59]

    2022, MNRAS, 513, 5000, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1196

    Martin-Alvarez, S. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 5000, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1196

    2022 doi

  51. [60]

    2025, A&A, 698, A89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553924 Faucher-Gigu` ere, C

    Farcy, M., Rosdahl, J., Dubois, Y., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, A89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553924 Faucher-Gigu` ere, C. A., Quataert, E., & Hopkins, P. F. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 1970, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STT866

    2025 doi

  52. [61]

    Federrath, C., & Klessen, R. S. 2012, ApJ, 761, 156, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/156

    2012 doi

  53. [62]

    J., Korista, K

    Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., Verner, D. A., et al. 1998, PASP, 110, 761, doi: 10.1086/316190

    1998 doi

  54. [63]

    2023, MNRAS, 522, 3986, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAD1095

    Ferrara, A., Pallottini, A., & Dayal, P. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 3986, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAD1095

    2023 doi

  55. [64]

    A., Mackey, J., Grassitelli, L., Romano-D ´ ıaz, E., & Porciani, C

    Fichtner, Y. A., Mackey, J., Grassitelli, L., Romano-D ´ ıaz, E., & Porciani, C. 2024, A&A, 690, A72, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449638

    2024 doi

  56. [65]

    L., Ryan, R

    Finkelstein, S. L., Ryan, R. E., Papovich, C., et al. 2015, ApJ, 810, 71, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/71

    2015 doi

  57. [66]

    L., Bagley, M

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Ferguson, H. C., et al. 2023, ApJL, 946, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acade4

    2023 doi

  58. [67]

    L., Leung, G

    Finkelstein, S. L., Leung, G. C. K., Bagley, M. B., et al. 2024, ApJL, 969, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/AD4495

    2024 doi

  59. [68]

    B., Dav´ e, R., Oppenheimer, B

    Ford, A. B., Dav´ e, R., Oppenheimer, B. D., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 1260, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1418

    2014 doi

  60. [69]

    2006, A&A, 457, 371, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065371

    Fromang, S., Hennebelle, P., & Teyssier, R. 2006, A&A, 457, 371, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065371

    2006 doi

  61. [70]

    2015, MNRAS, 454, 4484, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2272

    Geen, S., Hennebelle, P., Tremblin, P., & Rosdahl, J. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 4484, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2272

    2015 doi

  62. [71]

    R., Yan, R., & Tinker, J

    Geha, M., Blanton, M. R., Yan, R., & Tinker, J. L. 2012, ApJ, 757, 85, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/85

    2012 doi

  63. [72]

    2018, MNRAS, 479, 3042, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1653

    Girichidis, P., Naab, T., Hanasz, M., & Walch, S. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 3042, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1653

    2018 doi

  64. [73]

    2022, MNRAS, 510, 3917, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3462

    Girichidis, P., Pfrommer, C., Pakmor, R., & Springel, V. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 3917, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3462

    2022 doi

  65. [74]

    2010, Nature 2010 463:7278, 463, 203, doi: 10.1038/nature08640

    Governato, F., Brook, C., Mayer, L., et al. 2010, Nature 2010 463:7278, 463, 203, doi: 10.1038/nature08640

    2010 doi

  66. [75]

    E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    2024 doi

  67. [77]

    1996, ApJ, 461, 20, doi: 10.1086/177035

    Haardt, F., & Madau, P. 1996, ApJ, 461, 20, doi: 10.1086/177035

    1996 doi

  68. [79]

    2013, ApJL, 777, L38, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/777/2/L38

    Hanasz, M., Lesch, H., Naab, T., et al. 2013, ApJL, 777, L38, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/777/2/L38

    2013 doi

  69. [80]

    2024, ApJ, 960, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/AD0B7E

    Harikane, Y., Nakajima, K., Ouchi, M., et al. 2024, ApJ, 960, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/AD0B7E

    2024 doi

  70. [81]

    2023, ApJS, 265, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ACAAA9

    Harikane, Y., Ouchi, M., Oguri, M., et al. 2023, ApJS, 265, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ACAAA9

    2023 doi

  71. [82]

    K., Ellis, R

    Harikane, Y., Inoue, A. K., Ellis, R. S., et al. 2025, ApJ, 980, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/AD9B2C 30Martin-Alvarez et al

    2025 doi

  72. [83]

    J., Adams, N

    Harvey, T., Conselice, C. J., Adams, N. J., et al. 2025, ApJ, 978, 89, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/AD8C29

    2025 doi

  73. [84]

    T., Kruijssen, J

    Haydon, D. T., Kruijssen, J. M., Chevance, M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 235, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAA2430

    2020 doi

  74. [85]

    C., & Hopkins, P

    Hayward, C. C., & Hopkins, P. F. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 1682, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2888

    2017 doi

  75. [86]

    2015, ApJ, 809, 147, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/147

    Overzier, R., & Leitherer, C. 2015, ApJ, 809, 147, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/147

    2015 doi

  76. [87]

    M., & Furlanetto, S

    Hegde, S., Wyatt, M. M., & Furlanetto, S. R. 2024, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2024, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/08/025

    2024 doi

  77. [88]

    A., Vink, J., Bamba, A., et al

    Helder, E. A., Vink, J., Bamba, A., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 910, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt993

    2013 doi

  78. [89]

    F., Butsky, I

    Hopkins, P. F., Butsky, I. S., Panopoulou, G. V., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 3470, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAC1791

    2022 doi

  79. [90]

    F., Chan, T

    Hopkins, P. F., Chan, T. K., Ji, S., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 3640, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3690

    2021 doi

  80. [91]

    F., Kereˇ s, D., O˜ norbe, J., et al

    Hopkins, P. F., Kereˇ s, D., O˜ norbe, J., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 581, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1738

    2014 doi

  81. [92]

    F., Quataert, E., & Murray, N

    Hopkins, P. F., Quataert, E., & Murray, N. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 3522, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20593.x

    2012

  82. [93]

    2018, ApJ, 854, 73, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/AAA544

    Ishigaki, M., Kawamata, R., Ouchi, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 73, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/AAA544

    2018 doi

  83. [94]

    G., Speagle, J

    Iyer, K. G., Speagle, J. S., Caplar, N., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ACFF64

    2024 doi

  84. [95]

    P., & McCourt, M

    Ji, S., Oh, S. P., & McCourt, M. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 852, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty293

    2018 doi

  85. [96]

    2017, MNRAS, 467, 906, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx127

    Ji, S., Peng Oh, S., & McCourt, M. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 906, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx127

    2017 doi

  86. [97]

    2024, ApJ, 966, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/AD3042

    Kado-Fong, E., Geha, M., Mao, Y.-Y., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/AD3042

    2024 doi

  87. [98]

    2021, MNRAS, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAB3710

    Kannan, R., Garaldi, E., Smith, A., et al. 2021, MNRAS, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAB3710

    2021 doi

  88. [99]

    2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, doi: 10.33232/001C.145804

    Kannan, R., Puchwein, E., Smith, A., et al. 2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, doi: 10.33232/001C.145804

    2025 doi

  89. [100]

    P., Cadiou, C., Kimm, T., & Agertz, O

    Katz, H., Rey, M. P., Cadiou, C., Kimm, T., & Agertz, O. 2026, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 9, doi: 10.33232/001C.156097

    2026 doi

  90. [101]

    2020, MNRAS, 494, 2200, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa639

    Katz, H., Ramsoy, M., Rosdahl, J., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 2200, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa639

    2020 doi

  91. [102]

    P., Cadiou, C., et al

    Katz, H., Rey, M. P., Cadiou, C., et al. 2025, arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.05201

    2025

  92. [103]

    Kennicutt, Jr., R. C. 1998, ApJ, 498, 541, doi: 10.1086/305588

    1998 doi

  93. [104]

    Kim, C.-G., Kim, J.-G., Gong, M., & Ostriker, E. C. 2023, ApJ, 946, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbd3a

    2023 doi

  94. [105]

    2014, ApJ, 788, 121, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/2/121

    Kimm, T., & Cen, R. 2014, ApJ, 788, 121, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/2/121

    2014 doi

  95. [106]

    2015, MNRAS, 451, 2900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1211

    Kimm, T., Cen, R., Devriendt, J., Dubois, Y., & Slyz, A. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 2900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1211

    2015 doi

  96. [107]

    2017, MNRAS, 466, 4826, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STX052

    Kimm, T., Katz, H., Haehnelt, M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 4826, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STX052

    2017 doi

  97. [108]

    A., Taylor, A

    Kokorev, V., Ch´ avez Ortiz, O. A., Taylor, A. J., et al. 2025, ApJL, 988, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ade8f5

    2025 doi

  98. [109]

    P., Wijesekera, J

    Koprowski, M. P., Wijesekera, J. V., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A164, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449948

    2024 doi

  99. [111]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, 6103, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAD2540 Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al

    Kugel, R., Schaye, J., Schaller, M., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 6103, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAD2540 Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al. 2023, Nature, 616, 266, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2

    2023 doi

  100. [112]

    Leung, G. C. K., Bagley, M. B., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2023, ApJL, 954, L46, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ACF365

    2023 doi

  101. [113]

    2023, A&A, 676, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346232

    Llerena, M., Amor ´ ın, R., Pentericci, L., et al. 2023, A&A, 676, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346232

    2023 doi

  102. [114]

    J., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al

    Looser, T. J., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, Nature, 629, 53, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07227-0

    2024 doi

  103. [115]

    2014, ARA&A, 52, 415, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615

    Madau, P., & Dickinson, M. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 415, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615

    2014 doi

  104. [116]

    2008, A&A, 488, 463, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809678

    Maiolino, R., Nagao, T., Grazian, A., et al. 2008, A&A, 488, 463, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809678

    2008 doi

  105. [117]

    2024, Nature, 627, 59, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07052-5

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Witstok, J., et al. 2024, Nature, 627, 59, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07052-5

    2024 doi

  106. [118]

    2023, A&A, 670, A92, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244895

    Marasco, A., Belfiore, F., Cresci, G., et al. 2023, A&A, 670, A92, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244895

    2023 doi

  107. [119]

    2019, MNRAS, 489, 4233, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2391

    Springel, V. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 4233, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2391

    2019 doi

  108. [120]

    2022, MNRAS, 513, 3326, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1099

    Martin-Alvarez, S., Devriendt, J., Slyz, A., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 3326, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1099

    2022 doi

  109. [121]

    2025, MNRAS, 539, 1738, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAF470

    Martin-Alvarez, S., Irˇ siˇ c, V., Koudmani, S., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 1738, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAF470

    2025 doi

  110. [122]

    2021, MNRAS, 504, 2517, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab968

    Slyz, A. 2021, MNRAS, 504, 2517, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab968

    2021 doi

  111. [123]

    G., et al

    Martin-Alvarez, S., Sijacki, D., Haehnelt, M. G., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 3806, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2559

    2023 doi

  112. [124]

    2020, MNRAS, 495, 4475, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1438

    Martin-Alvarez, S., Slyz, A., Devriendt, J., & G´ omez-Guijarro, C. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 4475, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1438

    2020 doi

  113. [125]

    2024, ApJ, 966, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2e9e

    Martin-Alvarez, S., Lopez-Rodriguez, E., Dacunha, T., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2e9e

    2024 doi

  114. [126]

    G., et al

    Martin-Alvarez, S., Sijacki, D., Haehnelt, M. G., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 545, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2106

    2026 doi

  115. [127]

    A., Trenti, M., & Treu, T

    Mason, C. A., Trenti, M., & Treu, T. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 497, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAD035 Bursty First Galaxies in the Azahar Simulations31

    2023 doi

  116. [128]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, 513, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAF1660

    McClymont, W., Tacchella, S., Smith, A., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 513, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAF1660

    2025 doi

  117. [129]

    B., van Zee, L., & Skillman, E

    McQuinn, K. B., van Zee, L., & Skillman, E. D. 2019, Galactic Winds in Low-Mass Galaxies, doi: 10.1017/s1743921319000085

    2019 doi

  118. [130]

    R., Heckman, T

    Meurer, G. R., Heckman, T. M., & Calzetti, D. 1999, ApJ, 521, 64, doi: 10.1086/307523

    1999 doi

  119. [131]

    2012, A&A, 538, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117855

    Morlino, G., & Caprioli, D. 2012, A&A, 538, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117855

    2012 doi

  120. [132]

    L., Kereˇ s, D., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C

    Muratov, A. L., Kereˇ s, D., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C. A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 2691, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2126

    2015 doi

  121. [133]

    I., et al

    Navarro-Carrera, R., Rinaldi, P., Caputi, K. I., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 207, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/AD0DF6

    2024 doi

  122. [134]

    J., Suess, K

    Nelson, E. J., Suess, K. A., Bezanson, R., et al. 2023, ApJL, 948, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ACC1E1

    2023 doi

  123. [135]

    A., Bouwens, R

    Oesch, P. A., Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Labbe, I., & Stefanon, M. 2018, ApJ, 855, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab03f

    2018 doi

  124. [136]

    A., Bouwens, R

    Oesch, P. A., Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., et al. 2013, ApJ, 773, 75, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/773/1/75

    2013 doi

  125. [137]

    D., Dav´ e, R., Kereˇ s, D., et al

    Oppenheimer, B. D., Dav´ e, R., Kereˇ s, D., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 2325, doi: 10.1111/J.1365-2966.2010.16872.X

    2010

  126. [138]

    P., et al

    Pakmor, R., Springel, V., Coles, J. P., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 2539, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3620

    2023 doi

  127. [139]

    2022, MNRAS, 513, 5621, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1281

    Pallottini, A., Ferrara, A., Gallerani, S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 5621, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1281

    2022 doi

  128. [140]

    Parizot, E., Marcowith, A., Ballet, J., & Gallant, Y. A. 2006, A&A, 453, 387, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20064985

    2006 doi

  129. [141]

    Peacock, J. A. 1999, Cosmological Physics (Cambridge University Press)

    1999

  130. [142]

    2007, MNRAS, 378, 385, doi: 10.1111/J.1365- 2966.2007.11732.X/2/M{ }MNRAS0378-0385-M13.GIF

    Dolag, K. 2007, MNRAS, 378, 385, doi: 10.1111/J.1365- 2966.2007.11732.X/2/M{ }MNRAS0378-0385-M13.GIF

    2007

  131. [143]

    2017a, MNRAS, 465, 4500, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2941

    Springel, V. 2017a, MNRAS, 465, 4500, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2941

    doi

  132. [144]

    M., & Springel, V

    Pfrommer, C., Pakmor, R., Simpson, C. M., & Springel, V. 2017b, ApJ, 847, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8bb1

    doi

  133. [145]

    2018, MNRAS, 475, 648, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3112

    Pillepich, A., Nelson, D., Hernquist, L., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 648, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3112

    2018 doi

  134. [146]

    A., Best, P

    Pirie, C. A., Best, P. N., Duncan, K. J., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 541, 1348, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAF1006 Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A., Aghanim, N., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830

    2025 doi

  135. [148]

    H., Raicevic, M., & Schaye, J

    Rahmati, A., Pawlik, A. H., Raicevic, M., & Schaye, J. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 2427, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STT066

    2013 doi

  136. [149]

    2006, A&A, 445, 1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053116

    Rasera, Y., & Teyssier, R. 2006, A&A, 445, 1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053116

    2006 doi

  137. [150]

    E., Naab, T., Walch, S., et al

    Rathjen, T. E., Naab, T., Walch, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 1843, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAD1104

    2023 doi

  138. [151]

    A., & Steidel, C

    Reddy, N. A., & Steidel, C. C. 2009, ApJ, 692, 778, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/692/1/778

    2009 doi

  139. [152]

    2025, MNRAS, 543, 12, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1372

    Michel-Dansac, L. 2025, MNRAS, 543, 12, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1372

    2025 doi

  140. [153]

    D., Tacchella, S., et al

    Robertson, B., Johnson, B. D., Tacchella, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 970, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/AD463D

    2024 doi

  141. [154]

    2024, MNRAS, 534, 1420, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAE2132 Roca-F` abrega, S., Dekel, A., Faerman, Y., et al

    Robinson, H., & Wadsley, J. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 1420, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAE2132 Roca-F` abrega, S., Dekel, A., Faerman, Y., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 3625, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STZ063 Rodr ´ ıguez Montero, F., Dubois, Y., Katz, H., Slyz, A., &

    2024 doi

  142. [155]

    2026, http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21790 Rodr ´ ıguez Montero, F., Martin-Alvarez, S., Slyz, A., et al

    Devriendt, J. 2026, http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21790 Rodr ´ ıguez Montero, F., Martin-Alvarez, S., Slyz, A., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 3617, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAE1083

    2026

  143. [156]

    2013, MNRAS, 436, 2188, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1722

    Rosdahl, J., Blaizot, J., Aubert, D., Stranex, T., & Teyssier, R. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 2188, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1722

    2013 doi

  144. [157]

    2015, MNRAS, 451, 34, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv937

    Rosdahl, J., Schaye, J., Teyssier, R., & Agertz, O. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 34, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv937

    2015 doi

  145. [158]

    2015, MNRAS, 449, 4380, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv567

    Rosdahl, J., & Teyssier, R. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 4380, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv567

    2015 doi

  146. [159]

    2018, MNRAS, 479, 994, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1655

    Rosdahl, J., Katz, H., Blaizot, J., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 994, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1655

    2018 doi

  147. [160]

    Rosen, A., & Bregman, J. N. 1995, ApJ, 440, 634, doi: 10.1086/175303

    1995 doi

  148. [161]

    2023, A&A Rv, 31, doi: 10.1007/s00159-023-00149-2

    Ruszkowski, M., & Pfrommer, C. 2023, A&A Rv, 31, doi: 10.1007/s00159-023-00149-2

    2023 doi

  149. [162]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, 132, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAF1680

    Saldana-Lopez, A., Chisholm, J., Gazagnes, S., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 132, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAF1680

    2025 doi

  150. [163]

    L., & Corlies, L

    Salem, M., Bryan, G. L., & Corlies, L. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 582, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2641

    2016 doi

  151. [164]

    2024, A&A, 690, A59, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449822

    Sanati, M., Martin-Alvarez, S., Schober, J., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A59, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449822

    2024 doi

  152. [165]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Topping, M. W., Reddy, N. A., & Brammer, G. B. 2024, ApJ, 962, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/AD15FC

    2024 doi

  153. [166]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Jones, T., et al. 2021, ApJ, 914, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ABF4C1

    2021 doi

  154. [167]

    S., Vandenbroucke, B., Falceta-Goncalves, D., & Wood, K

    Sartorio, N. S., Vandenbroucke, B., Falceta-Goncalves, D., & Wood, K. 2020, MNRAS, 500, 1833, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAA3380

    2020 doi

  155. [168]

    J., Katz, H., et al

    Saxena, A., Cameron, A. J., Katz, H., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 548, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAG808

    2026 doi

  156. [169]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, 4978, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2419 32Martin-Alvarez et al

    Schaye, J., Kugel, R., Schaller, M., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 4978, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2419 32Martin-Alvarez et al

    2023 doi

  157. [170]

    2012, MNRAS, 419, 1566, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19818.x

    Schneider, R., Omukai, K., Bianchi, S., & Valiante, R. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 1566, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19818.x

    2012

  158. [171]

    A., Conroy, C., & Hernquist, L

    Semenov, V. A., Conroy, C., & Hernquist, L. 2025, ApJ, 989, 219, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ADE22D

    2025 doi

  159. [172]

    2023, MNRAS, 525, 3254, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAD2508

    Shen, X., Vogelsberger, M., Boylan-Kolchin, M., Tacchella, S., & Kannan, R. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 3254, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAD2508

    2023 doi

  160. [173]

    K., Mo, H

    Sheth, R. K., Mo, H. J., & Tormen, G. 2001, MNRAS, 323, 1, doi: 10.1046/J.1365-8711.2001.04006.X

    2001

  161. [174]

    Gent, F. A. 2018, Magnetic field effects on the ISM structure and galactic outflows, Tech. rep., International Astronomical Union. http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.01202https: //arxiv.org/pdf/1810.01202.pdf

    2018 arXiv

  162. [175]

    2025, A&A, 695, A20, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452570

    Shuntov, M., Ilbert, O., Toft, S., et al. 2025, A&A, 695, A20, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452570

    2025 doi

  163. [176]

    2025, ApJ, 987, 204, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adda3d

    Weber, M. 2025, ApJ, 987, 204, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adda3d

    2025 doi

  164. [177]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, 4551, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAF1950

    Simmonds, C., Tacchella, S., McClymont, W., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 4551, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAF1950

    2025 doi

  165. [178]

    C., Sijacki, D., & Shen, S

    Smith, M. C., Sijacki, D., & Shen, S. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 3317, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz599

    2019 doi

  166. [179]

    C., Fielding, D

    Smith, M. C., Fielding, D. B., Bryan, G. L., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 527, 1216, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3168

    2023 doi

  167. [180]

    S., & Dav´ e, R

    Somerville, R. S., & Dav´ e, R. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 51, doi: 10.1146/ANNUREV-ASTRO-082812- 140951/CITE/REFWORKS

    2015 doi

  168. [181]

    2003, MNRAS, 339, 289, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06206.x

    Springel, V., & Hernquist, L. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 289, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06206.x

    2003

  169. [182]

    R., & Eldridge, J

    Stanway, E. R., & Eldridge, J. J. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 75, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STY1353

    2018 doi

  170. [183]

    R., Eldridge, J

    Stanway, E. R., Eldridge, J. J., & Becker, G. D. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 485, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2661

    2016 doi

  171. [184]

    J., Labb´ e, I., et al

    Stefanon, M., Bouwens, R. J., Labb´ e, I., et al. 2021, ApJ, 922, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/AC1BB6

    2021 doi

  172. [185]

    J., Labb´ e, I., et al

    Stefanon, M., Bouwens, R. J., Labb´ e, I., et al. 2017, ApJ, 843, 36, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/AA72D8

    2017 doi

  173. [186]

    2023, ApJL, 951, L40, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ACDEF6

    Sneppen, A. 2023, ApJL, 951, L40, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ACDEF6

    2023 doi

  174. [187]

    2024, ApJ, 970, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/AD499A

    Sugimura, K., Ricotti, M., Park, J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 970, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/AD499A

    2024 doi

  175. [188]

    A., Hayward, C

    Sun, G., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C. A., Hayward, C. C., & Shen, X. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 2665, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAD2902

    2023 doi

  176. [189]

    2022, MNRAS, 513, 2904, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAC818

    Tacchella, S., Smith, A., Kannan, R., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 2904, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAC818

    2022 doi

  177. [190]

    2025, A&A, 696, A226, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453311

    Taziaux, S., M¨ uller, A., Adebahr, B., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A226, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453311

    2025 doi

  178. [191]

    2002, A&A, 385, 337, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011817

    Teyssier, R. 2002, A&A, 385, 337, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011817

    2002 doi

  179. [192]

    2006, Journal of Computational Physics, 218, 44, doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.01.042

    Teyssier, R., Fromang, S., & Dormy, E. 2006, Journal of Computational Physics, 218, 44, doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.01.042

    2006 doi

  180. [193]

    A., & Heckman, T

    Thompson, T. A., & Heckman, T. M. 2024, ARA&A, 62, 529, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-041224-011924

    2024 doi

  181. [194]

    V., Klypin, A., et al

    Tinker, J., Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin, A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 688, 709, doi: 10.1086/591439 T´ oth, G. 2000, Journal of Computational Physics, 161, 605, doi: 10.1006/jcph.2000.6519

    2008

  182. [195]

    W., Schaye, J., Correa, C., et al

    Trayford, J. W., Schaye, J., Correa, C., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 545, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2040

    2026 doi

  183. [196]

    V., et al

    Trotta, R., J´ ohannesson, G., Moskalenko, I. V., et al. 2011, ApJ, 729, 106, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/729/2/106

    2011 doi

  184. [197]

    S., & Werk, J

    Tumlinson, J., Peeples, M. S., & Werk, J. K. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 389, doi: 10.1146/ANNUREV-ASTRO-091916-055240/1

    2017 doi

  185. [198]

    2009, A&A, 506, 647, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911787 ¨Ubler, H., Mazzolari, G., Maiolino, R., et al

    Tweed, D., Devriendt, J., Blaizot, J., Colombi, S., & Slyz, A. 2009, A&A, 506, 647, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911787 ¨Ubler, H., Mazzolari, G., Maiolino, R., et al. 2025, arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.21575 van Daalen, M. P., McCarthy, I. G., & Schaye, J. 2020, MNRAS, 491,...

    2009 arXiv

  186. [199]

    2020, Nature Reviews Physics, 2, 42, doi: 10.1038/s42254-019-0127-2

    Vogelsberger, M., Marinacci, F., Torrey, P., & Puchwein, E. 2020, Nature Reviews Physics, 2, 42, doi: 10.1038/s42254-019-0127-2

    2020 doi

  187. [200]

    A., Barrufet, L., et al

    Weibel, A., Oesch, P. A., Barrufet, L., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 1808, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAE1891

    2024 doi

  188. [201]

    d., Setton, D

    Weibel, A., Graaff, A. d., Setton, D. J., et al. 2025, ApJ, 983, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adab7a

    2025 doi

  189. [202]

    2017, MNRAS, 465, 3291, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2944

    Weinberger, R., Springel, V., Hernquist, L., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 3291, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2944

    2017 doi

  190. [203]

    K., Prochaska, J

    Werk, J. K., Prochaska, J. X., Tumlinson, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 792, 8, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/8

    2014 doi

  191. [204]

    K., Prochaska, J

    Werk, J. K., Prochaska, J. X., Cantalupo, S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/54

    2016 doi

  192. [205]

    P., Topping, M

    Whitler, L., Stark, D. P., Topping, M. W., et al. 2025, ApJ, 992, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ADFDDC

    2025 doi

  193. [206]

    G., et al

    Yuan, Y., Martin-Alvarez, S., Haehnelt, M. G., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 542, 762, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAF1252

    2025 doi

  194. [207]

    2024, MNRAS, 532, 3643, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAE1606 Bursty First Galaxies in the Azahar Simulations33

    Sijacki, D. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 3643, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STAE1606 Bursty First Galaxies in the Azahar Simulations33

    2024 doi

  195. [208]

    S., Ponti, G., Carretti, E., et al

    Zhang, H. S., Ponti, G., Carretti, E., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy 2024 8:11, 8, 1416, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02362-0

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.