Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 96 references

No stabilizer state in a discrete realization of a local quantum field theory can flow to the vacuum, because the vacuum's entanglement spectrum is never flat.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 21:03 UTC pith:SSZYARYM

load-bearing objection A clean structural argument that QFT vacuum-like states are non-stabilizer; the stronger 'no stabilizer state can flow to the vacuum' claim has a real but admitted gap in the continuum-limit step. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.16403 v1 pith:SSZYARYM submitted 2026-07-17 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechhep-latquant-ph

Universality of Magic in Local Quantum Field Theory

Valentin Benedetti , Atish Dabholkar , Marcello Dalmonte This is my paper
classification hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechhep-latquant-ph MSC 81T0581P4046L1081T40 PACS 03.67.-a11.10.-z11.25.Hf
keywords magicstabilizer statesentanglement spectrum flatnessRényi entropiestype III_1 factorslocal quantum field theoryClifford circuitsholography
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish that magic — the resource that lifts a state out of the class of stabilizer states, which Clifford circuits can simulate classically — is present in every physically relevant state of a local quantum field theory. The bridge is the entanglement spectrum. Stabilizer states always have a flat spectrum: all order-n entanglement entropies coincide for every spatial bipartition. In a local QFT, the vacuum is cyclic and separating for the algebra of any region, and the modular operator of such a state has continuous spectrum; the algebra is a type III_1 factor, so a flat spectrum is impossible. The paper concludes that no lattice stabilizer state can flow to the vacuum or to any vacuum-like state in the continuum, and hence such states necessarily have non-zero magic. It supports this with explicit computations — CFT vacuum mutual information in two and four dimensions, and free-boson particle states — showing regulator-free non-flatness.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that magic is a universal property of local quantum field theories: any state that resembles the vacuum at short distances has non-zero magic. The proof rests on a single invariant contrast. A stabilizer state's reduced density matrix is proportional to a projector, so all of its Rényi entropies are equal and its modular flow is trivial. In a local QFT, the vacuum is cyclic and separating for every local algebra, and for a wedge region the modular operator is the exponential of the Lorentz boost, which has continuous spectrum; the algebra is a type III_1 factor. Faithful normal states therefore necessarily have a non-flat entanglement spectrum. Since flatness is

What carries the argument

The key objects are entanglement-spectrum flatness and the modular operator. For a stabilizer state on a qudit chain, every reduced density matrix is proportional to a projector, forcing all Rényi entropies S_n(A) to be equal and all Rényi mutual informations I_n(A_1,A_2) to be independent of n. In QFT, modular theory assigns to each faithful normal state a modular operator; for a wedge in the vacuum this operator is e^{-2πK}, with K the Lorentz boost, so its spectrum is continuous and the local algebra is a type III_1 factor. The factor invariant computed from modular spectra is the full positive real line for type III_1, whereas a stabilizer state would give a trivial modular operator. The

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that flatness of the entanglement spectrum is inherited by the continuum limit — a sequence of states flat at every lattice spacing cannot converge to a non-flat vacuum; the paper flags this as a perverse possibility and argues against it, but gives no convergence theorem.

What would settle it

Compute the regulator-free Rényi mutual information I_2 and I_3 between two disjoint intervals in a lattice discretization of a local QFT at decreasing lattice spacing: if the difference I_2 - I_3 stays nonzero and approaches the CFT prediction (4.6), the argument is supported. A concrete counterexample would be an explicit family of stabilizer states whose Rényi mutual information becomes n-dependent exactly in the continuum limit, thereby preserving flatness.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, any physical state of a local QFT that approximates the vacuum at short distances carries non-zero magic, ruling out exact stabilizer and Clifford simulation.
  • The n-dependence of the regulator-free Rényi mutual information for CFT vacua gives an explicit, measurable witness that can certify the absence of flatness on a lattice.
  • Topological field theories, which do not form nets of type III_1 factors, can have flat spectra and stabilizer ground states (e.g., the toric code), so the result draws a sharp line between local QFT and TQFT in terms of computational resources.
  • In holography, faithful states on boundary subregions cannot be stabilizer states; flat-spectrum states such as bulk fixed-area states are non-faithful, and physical states acquire non-flat subleading corrections.
  • Free-boson particle states have non-flat spectra, and the anti-flatness quantity provides a lower bound on their magic.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 'perverse possibility' flagged in the paper materializes — flatness not surviving the continuum limit — then the obstruction would be a feature of the limit rather than of any finite-lattice stabilizer state; a convergence theorem for Rényi mutual information would settle this and is the most direct extension.
  • The flatness criterion suggests a computational phase diagram for lattice models: gapped or topological phases with flat spectra should remain classically simulable under scaling, while critical fixed points should show growing n-dependence of mutual information; this is testable in tensor-network codes.
  • The free-boson particle-state results provide a rare family of QFT states where magic can be bounded quantitatively; extending these bounds to interacting or gauge theories would connect the argument to lattice simulation practice.
  • The paper's distinction between magic and non-Gaussianity implies that even Gaussian free-field states carry magic; this could be probed by measuring stabilizer Rényi entropies on analog quantum simulators of free fields.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper argues that no stabilizer state in a discrete realization of a local QFT can flow to the vacuum or to any vacuum-like state in the continuum. The argument rests on two ingredients: qudit stabilizer states have flat entanglement spectra (all Rényi entropies equal, Eq. 2.16), and cyclic/separating states in local QFT have non-flat spectra because local algebras are type III_1 factors (§3.2). The paper also gives a Bisognano–Wichmann/replica argument (§3.1), explicit CFT vacuum computations (§4.1), and an exact free-boson calculation (§4.2). It concludes that physical QFT states necessarily have non-zero magic and cannot be simulated classically by Clifford/stabilizer circuits.

Significance. If the central 'cannot flow in the continuum' claim were rigorously established, this would be a notable universal statement connecting entanglement, modular theory, and quantum computational resources. The paper cleanly proves the lattice stabilizer flatness lemma and the non-flatness of faithful normal states in type III_1 factors; the regulator-free CFT mutual-information differences (Eq. 4.7) and the free-boson Rényi entropies (Eq. 4.37) are valuable concrete witnesses. The authors are also honest in Footnote 2 about the main gap. However, as it stands, the headline claim is not fully proven because a load-bearing continuity assumption is asserted rather than established.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, Footnote 2; Eqs. (2.18), (4.7)] The abstract's 'can flow in the continuum' requires that flatness of the entanglement spectrum, or equivalently n-independence of the Rényi mutual information, is preserved under the lattice-to-continuum limit. The paper proves lattice stabilizer states are flat (§2.2) and continuum cyclic/separating states are non-flat (§3.2), but it does not prove that a sequence of states flat at every finite spacing cannot converge to a non-flat continuum state. Footnote 2 explicitly admits this 'perverse possibility' and says only that it is 'highly unlikely'; the mutual-information argument comparing Eq. (2.18) with Eq. (4.7) assumes, without a convergence theorem, that lattice I_n tends to continuum I_n in the relevant topology. The §3.2 string argument (Eq. 3.15) shows only that surviving stabilizer strings must converge to the identity, which is precisely a scenario where flatness is not inherit
  2. [§3.1, Eqs. (3.9)–(3.12)] The step from ∑_{X⊂A} x_{X,Λ} \tilde H_{X,Λ}=0 to c^X_{a,b,k}=0 is not justified as written. Unless the operators H_{X,Λ} are defined to contain only Pauli strings with support exactly X, a string supported on Y⊂X contributes to the expansion of every H_X with X⊇Y, so the equation only imposes ∑_{X⊇Y} x_X c^X_{a,b,k}=0 for each Y, not the vanishing of each coefficient. Moreover, Eq. (3.7) is a lattice regularization approximating the Bisognano–Wichmann modular Hamiltonian; exact flatness of a lattice state would require the exact lattice modular Hamiltonian to be proportional to the identity, not merely its BW approximant. The replica scaling argument around Eq. (3.2) is also heuristic. Thus the §3.1 route to non-flatness of the vacuum is not established as stated, although §3.2 may provide an independent algebraic argument.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typos: 'fucntion' and 'orginal' near Eq. (3.1), 'apropiate' and 'discetrization' near Eq. (3.7), 'independant' near Eq. (2.18), and 'In then→0 limit' in §4.1.
  2. [Eq. (4.39)] The Pochhammer-like symbol is defined as (a)_0=0, but standard hypergeometric series require (a)_0=1. As written, the first term in Eq. (4.37) would vanish, making the expression incorrect.
  3. [Eq. (4.11)] The exponent 'Pn_j=1 ∆ϕ_j' is garbled; it should presumably be ∑_j Δ_{φ_j}.
  4. [Figure 4 caption] The caption refers to 'I_{n−1} − I_n', whereas the text and Eq. (4.7) use I_{n+1} − I_n. Please align the notation.
  5. [References] Reference [49] duplicates [17] (White–Cao–Swingle). Please remove the duplicate and renumber.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: stabilizer flatness and type III₁ non-flatness are independent premises; the acknowledged continuum-limit gap is an unsupported premise, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

No circular step is exhibited. The flat entanglement spectrum of stabilizer states is derived internally in §2.2 from the defining projector structure (Eq. 2.16), not assumed from the QFT claim. The non-flatness of faithful normal states in QFT follows from the independent type III₁ Connes invariant S(A)=R+ and from the Bisognano–Wichmann modular spectrum, with explicit CFT support from external Calabrese–Cardy and Cardy–Tonni results (Eqs. 4.1, 4.3, 4.7). These quantities are not fitted to the conclusion and no prediction is constructed from the target result. The step from 'non-flat' to 'magic' uses flatness only as a necessary witness, and the conclusion that CFT vacua are magical is independently known from [17,20,21]. Self-citations such as [24], [60], and [94] are peripheral or corroborative and are not load-bearing reductions. The main weakness is explicitly acknowledged in footnote 2: 'There is a perverse possibility that a state with a flat spectrum on a lattice flows to a state with a nonflat spectrum in the continuum. We argue later that this is highly unlikely...' This is a missing convergence/continuity theorem connecting lattice flatness to continuum non-flatness — a genuine correctness gap, but not a circularity, since the paper does not define or fit the continuum property in terms of the lattice property by construction. Score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; the central argument is parameter-free and tracks structural properties (flatness, cyclicity/separability, type III₁). The examples introduce standard theory data — central charge c, cross-ratio ξ, Unruh factor q_ω, the free-energy coefficient σ — which are physical inputs, not fitted constants. The load-bearing assumptions are the algebraic axioms of local QFT (type III₁ nets, BW and Reeh-Schlieder theorems) plus the unproven inheritance of flatness through the continuum limit (footnote 2).

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Algebras of observables associated to subregions in a local QFT are generically type III₁ factors (Fredenhagen; Buchholz-Fredenhagen-D'Antoni).
    Invoked in footnote 1 and §3.2 as the working definition of 'local QFT'; it is the physical input that forces non-flat spectra for faithful normal states.
  • standard math Bisognano-Wichmann theorem: for the Rindler wedge, the vacuum modular Hamiltonian is the boost generator K = ∫ x¹ T₀₀ d^{D-1}x.
    Core input of §3.1 and of the §4.1 sphere/CFT examples; presumes Lorentz invariance and a local stress-energy tensor for the derivation.
  • standard math Reeh-Schlieder theorem: the vacuum is cyclic and separating for the local algebra of any region.
    Used in §3.2 to extend the argument from the vacuum to all states that 'sufficiently resemble' it at short distances.
  • ad hoc to paper Flatness of the entanglement spectrum is preserved under the lattice-to-continuum limit (the 'perverse possibility' of footnote 2 is excluded).
    The abstract's 'can flow in the continuum' claim requires this inheritance step. Footnote 2 admits it is argued as 'highly unlikely', not proven; the regulator-free mutual-information argument is evidence, not a theorem.
  • domain assumption Scaling-algebra result: states resembling the vacuum at short distances have modular operators approximated by the Bisognano-Wichmann one.
    Invoked in §3.2 (refs. [65,66]) to extend non-flatness from the vacuum to all physically relevant cyclic-separating states.
  • standard math Tomita-Takesaki theory and the Connes classification: type III₁ factors have modular spectrum {0}∪ℝ₊; type I_f has spectrum containing {1}.
    Used in §3.2 to contrast stabilizer modular flow (Δ = I on support) with the continuous modular flow of faithful QFT states.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 20324 in / 21333 out tokens · 190661 ms · 2026-08-01T21:03:01.541548+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We show that no stabilizer state in a discrete realization of a local quantum field theory can flow in the continuum to the vacuum or to any state that resembles the vacuum at short distances. The argument rests on the fact that the entanglement spectrum is flat for stabilizer states but non-flat for cyclic and separating states in a local QFT as a consequence of the type III$_1$ nature of the von Neumann algebras associated with arbitrary subregions. Our result implies that simulating physically relevant QFT states necessarily requires quantum resources beyond stabilizer states and Clifford operations. We comment on the implications for holography.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 72 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Nielsen and I.L

    M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang,Quantum computation and quantum information, Cambridge university press (2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    Gottesman,Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction,quant-ph/9705052

    D. Gottesman,Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction,quant-ph/9705052

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    Gottesman,The Heisenberg representation of quantum computers, in22nd International Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics, pp

    D. Gottesman,The Heisenberg representation of quantum computers, in22nd International Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics, pp. 32–43, 7, 1998 [quant-ph/9807006]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Aaronson and D

    S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman,Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits,Phys. Rev. A70 (2004) 052328 [quant-ph/0406196]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  5. [5]

    Ba˜ nuls, R

    M.C. Ba˜ nuls, R. Blatt, J. Catani, A. Celi, J.I. Cirac, M. Dalmonte et al.,Simulating lattice gauge theories within quantum technologies,Eur. Phys. J. D74(2020) 165

    2020

  6. [6]

    Bauer et al.,Quantum Simulation for High-Energy Physics,PRX Quantum4(2023) 027001 [2204.03381]

    C.W. Bauer et al.,Quantum Simulation for High-Energy Physics,PRX Quantum4(2023) 027001 [2204.03381]. 6This is clear in theN→ ∞limit, when the theory is described by a net of Generalized Free Fields, as they satisfy the local QFT axioms [92]. See also [93–95] for more recent holographic discussions in the context of subalgebra-subregion duality. – 22 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Chitambar and G

    E. Chitambar and G. Gour,Quantum resource theories,Rev. Mod. Phys.91(2019) 025001 [1806.06107]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Bravyi and A

    S. Bravyi and A. Kitaev,Universal quantum computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas,Phys. Rev. A71(2005) 022316 [quant-ph/0403025]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  9. [9]

    Howard, J.J

    M. Howard, J.J. Wallman, V. Veitch and J. Emerson,Contextuality supplies the ‘magic’ for quantum computation,Nature510(2014) 351 [1401.4174]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  10. [10]

    Dawson and M.A

    C.M. Dawson and M.A. Nielsen,The Solovay-Kitaev algorithm,Quant. Inf. Comput.6 (2006) 081 [quant-ph/0505030]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  11. [11]

    Dennis, A

    E. Dennis, A. Kitaev, A. Landahl and J. Preskill,Topological quantum memory,J. Math. Phys.43(2002) 4452 [quant-ph/0110143]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  12. [12]

    Kitaev,Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons,Annals of Physics303(2003) 2 [quant-ph/9707021]

    A.Y. Kitaev,Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons,Annals of Physics303(2003) 2 [quant-ph/9707021]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  13. [13]

    C. Cao, G. Cheng, A. Hamma, L. Leone, W. Munizzi and S.F.E. Oliviero,Gravitational Backreaction is Magical,PRX Quantum6(2025) 040375 [2403.07056]

    arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Chemissany, E

    W. Chemissany, E. Gesteau, A. Jahn, D. Murphy and L. Shaposhnik,On infinite tensor networks, complementary recovery and type II factors,J. Phys. A58(2025) 435301 [2504.00096]

    arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    R. Basu, O. Parrikar, S. Paul and H. Rajgadia,On the stabilizer complexity of Hawking radiation,2510.18967

    arXiv

  16. [16]

    C. Cao, G. Cheng, K. Karthikeyan, C. Li and J. Preskill,State-dependent geometries from magic-enriched quantum codes,2603.13475

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [18]

    Haug and L

    T. Haug and L. Piroli,Quantifying nonstabilizerness of matrix product states,Phys. Rev. B 107(2023) 035148 [2207.13076]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  18. [19]

    Tarabunga, E

    P.S. Tarabunga, E. Tirrito, T. Chanda and M. Dalmonte,Many-Body Magic Via Pauli-Markov Chains—From Criticality to Gauge Theories,PRX Quantum4(2023) 040317 [2305.18541]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [20]

    Hoshino, M

    M. Hoshino, M. Oshikawa and Y. Ashida,Stabilizer R´ enyi Entropy and Conformal Field Theory,Phys. Rev. X16(2026) 011037 [2503.13599]

    arXiv 2026

  20. [21]

    Hoshino and Y

    M. Hoshino and Y. Ashida,Stabilizer R´ enyi Entropy Encodes Fusion Rules of Topological Defects and Boundaries,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 080402 [2507.10656]

    arXiv 2026

  21. [22]

    Y.-M. Ding, Z. Wang and Z. Yan,Evaluating Many-Body Stabilizer R´ enyi Entropy by Sampling Reduced Pauli Strings: Singularities, Volume Law, and Nonlocal Magic,PRX Quantum6(2025) 030328 [2501.12146]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [23]

    A. Gu, S.F. Oliviero and L. Leone,Magic-induced computational separation in entanglement theory,PRX Quantum6(2025) 020324

    2025

  23. [24]

    Tirrito, P.S

    E. Tirrito, P.S. Tarabunga, G. Lami, T. Chanda, L. Leone, S.F.E. Oliviero et al., Quantifying nonstabilizerness through entanglement spectrum flatness,Phys. Rev. A109 (2024) L040401 [2304.01175]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [25]

    Reeh and S

    H. Reeh and S. Schlieder,Bemerkungen zur Unitaaraquivalenz von Lorentzinvarienten Feldern,Nuovo Cimento22(1961) 1051. – 23 –

    1961

  25. [26]

    Witten,APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory,Rev

    E. Witten,APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory,Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018) 045003 [1803.04993]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [27]

    Fredenhagen,On the Modular Structure of Local Algebras of Observables,Commun

    K. Fredenhagen,On the Modular Structure of Local Algebras of Observables,Commun. Math. Phys.97(1985) 79

    1985

  27. [28]

    Buchholz, K

    D. Buchholz, K. Fredenhagen and C. D’Antoni,The Universal Structure of Local Algebras, Commun. Math. Phys.111(1987) 123

    1987

  28. [29]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta,A Finite entanglement entropy and the c-theorem,Phys. Lett. B 600(2004) 142 [hep-th/0405111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  29. [30]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta,A c-theorem for the entanglement entropy,J. Phys. A40(2007) 7031 [cond-mat/0610375]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  30. [31]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta,On the RG running of the entanglement entropy of a circle,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 125016 [1202.5650]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  31. [32]

    Casini, E

    H. Casini, E. Test´ e and G. Torroba,Markov Property of the Conformal Field Theory Vacuum and the a Theorem,Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 261602 [1704.01870]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [33]

    Casini,Relative entropy and the Bekenstein bound,Class

    H. Casini,Relative entropy and the Bekenstein bound,Class. Quant. Grav.25(2008) 205021 [0804.2182]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  33. [34]

    Faulkner, R.G

    T. Faulkner, R.G. Leigh, O. Parrikar and H. Wang,Modular Hamiltonians for Deformed Half-Spaces and the Averaged Null Energy Condition,JHEP09(2016) 038 [1605.08072]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [35]

    Hartman, S

    T. Hartman, S. Kundu and A. Tajdini,Averaged Null Energy Condition from Causality, JHEP07(2017) 066 [1610.05308]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [36]

    Balakrishnan, T

    S. Balakrishnan, T. Faulkner, Z.U. Khandker and H. Wang,A General Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition,JHEP09(2019) 020 [1706.09432]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  36. [37]

    Bousso, Z

    R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, J. Koeller, S. Leichenauer and A.C. Wall,Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 024017 [1509.02542]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [38]

    Klebanov, D

    I.R. Klebanov, D. Kutasov and A. Murugan,Entanglement as a probe of confinement,Nucl. Phys. B796(2008) 274 [0709.2140]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  38. [39]

    Casini, M

    H. Casini, M. Huerta, J.M. Magan and D. Pontello,Entropic order parameters for the phases of QFT,JHEP04(2021) 277 [2008.11748]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [40]

    F. Ares, S. Murciano and P. Calabrese,Entanglement asymmetry as a probe of symmetry breaking,Nature Commun.14(2023) 2036 [2207.14693]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [41]

    Calabrese and J.L

    P. Calabrese and J.L. Cardy,Time-dependence of correlation functions following a quantum quench,Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 136801 [cond-mat/0601225]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  41. [42]

    Calabrese,Entanglement spreading in non-equilibrium integrable systems,SciPost Phys

    P. Calabrese,Entanglement spreading in non-equilibrium integrable systems,SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes20(2020) 1 [2008.11080]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  42. [43]

    Bisognano and E.H

    J.J. Bisognano and E.H. Wichmann,On the Duality Condition for Quantum Fields,J. Math. Phys.17(1976) 303

    1976

  43. [44]

    Dalmonte, V

    M. Dalmonte, V. Eisler, M. Falconi and B. Vermersch,Entanglement hamiltonians: from field theory to lattice models and experiments,Annalen der Physik534(2022) 2200064

    2022

  44. [45]

    Unruh,Notes on black hole evaporation,Phys

    W.G. Unruh,Notes on black hole evaporation,Phys. Rev. D14(1976) 870. – 24 –

    1976

  45. [46]

    Boulware,Quantum Field Theory in Schwarzschild and Rindler Spaces,Phys

    D.G. Boulware,Quantum Field Theory in Schwarzschild and Rindler Spaces,Phys. Rev. D 11(1975) 1404

    1975

  46. [47]

    Birrell and P.C.W

    N.D. Birrell and P.C.W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1982), 10.1017/CBO9780511622632

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622632 1982

  47. [48]

    Gheorghiu,Standard form of qudit stabilizer groups,Phys

    V. Gheorghiu,Standard form of qudit stabilizer groups,Phys. Lett. A378(2014) 505 [1101.1519]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  48. [49]

    White, C

    C.D. White, C. Cao and B. Swingle,Conformal field theories are magical,Phys. Rev. B103 (2021) 075145 [2007.01303]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  49. [50]

    Farinholt,An Ideal Characterization of the Clifford Operators,J

    J.M. Farinholt,An Ideal Characterization of the Clifford Operators,J. Phys. A47(2014) 305303 [1307.5087]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  50. [51]

    O. Hahn, G. Ferrini and R. Takagi,Bridging Magic and Non-Gaussian Resources via Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill Encoding,PRX Quantum6(2025) 010330 [2406.06418]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [52]

    Parham,Quantum Circuit Lower Bounds in the Magic Hierarchy, 4, 2025 [2504.19966]

    N. Parham,Quantum Circuit Lower Bounds in the Magic Hierarchy, 4, 2025 [2504.19966]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  52. [53]

    Korbany, M.J

    D.A. Korbany, M.J. Gullans and L. Piroli,Long-Range Nonstabilizerness and Phases of Matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 160404 [2502.19504]

    arXiv 2025

  53. [54]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta,Entanglement entropy in free quantum field theory,J. Phys. A42 (2009) 504007 [0905.2562]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  54. [55]

    Rangamani and T

    M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi,Holographic Entanglement Entropy, vol. 931, Springer (2017), 10.1007/978-3-319-52573-0, [1609.01287]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  55. [56]

    S. Dong, E. Fradkin, R.G. Leigh and S. Nowling,Topological Entanglement Entropy in Chern-Simons Theories and Quantum Hall Fluids,JHEP05(2008) 016 [0802.3231]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  56. [57]

    Korbany, T.D

    D.A. Korbany, T.D. Ellison, D.T. Stephen and L. Piroli,Long-range nonstabilizerness of topologically encoded states from mutual information,2605.22424

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [58]

    Kitaev,Quantum computations: algorithms and error correction,Russian Mathematical Surveys52(1997) 1191

    A.Y. Kitaev,Quantum computations: algorithms and error correction,Russian Mathematical Surveys52(1997) 1191

    1997

  58. [59]

    Kitaev and J

    A. Kitaev and J. Preskill,Topological entanglement entropy,Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 110404 [hep-th/0510092]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  59. [60]

    Giudici, T

    G. Giudici, T. Mendes-Santos, P. Calabrese and M. Dalmonte,Entanglement Hamiltonians of lattice models via the Bisognano-Wichmann theorem,Phys. Rev. B98(2018) 134403 [1807.01322]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [61]

    Pourjafarabadi, H

    M. Pourjafarabadi, H. Najafzadeh, M.-S. Vaezi and A. Vaezi,Entanglement Hamiltonian of interacting systems: Local temperature approximation and beyond,Phys. Rev. Res.3(2021) 013217 [2012.05248]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  61. [62]

    Yngvason,The Role of type III factors in quantum field theory,Rept

    J. Yngvason,The Role of type III factors in quantum field theory,Rept. Math. Phys.55 (2005) 135 [math-ph/0411058]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  62. [63]

    Takesaki,Tomita’s Theory of Modular Hilbert Algebras and its Applications, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag (1970), 10.1007/bfb0065832

    M. Takesaki,Tomita’s Theory of Modular Hilbert Algebras and its Applications, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag (1970), 10.1007/bfb0065832

    doi:10.1007/bfb0065832 1970

  63. [64]

    Connes,Une classification des facteurs de type III,Annales scientifiques de l’ ´Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure6(1973) 133

    A. Connes,Une classification des facteurs de type III,Annales scientifiques de l’ ´Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure6(1973) 133. – 25 –

    1973

  64. [65]

    Buchholz and R

    D. Buchholz and R. Verch,Scaling algebras and renormalization group in algebraic quantum field theory,Rev. Math. Phys.7(1995) 1195 [hep-th/9501063]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  65. [66]

    Buchholz and R

    D. Buchholz and R. Verch,Scaling algebras and renormalization group in algebraic quantum field theory. II. Instructive examples,Rev. Math. Phys.10(1998) 775 [hep-th/9708095]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  66. [67]

    Leone, S.F.E

    L. Leone, S.F.E. Oliviero and A. Hamma,Stabilizer R´ enyi Entropy,Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022) 050402 [2106.12587]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  67. [68]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy,Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory,J. Phys. A42 (2009) 504005 [0905.4013]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  68. [69]

    Calabrese, J

    P. Calabrese, J. Cardy and E. Tonni,Entanglement entropy of two disjoint intervals in conformal field theory,J. Stat. Mech.0911(2009) P11001 [0905.2069]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  69. [70]

    Calabrese, J

    P. Calabrese, J. Cardy and E. Tonni,Entanglement entropy of two disjoint intervals in conformal field theory II,J. Stat. Mech.1101(2011) P01021 [1011.5482]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  70. [71]

    Enolski and T

    V.Z. Enolski and T. Grava,SingularZ N -curves and the Riemann-Hilbert problem,Int. Math Res. Notices32(2004) 1619–1683

    2004

  71. [72]

    Headrick, A

    M. Headrick, A. Lawrence and M.M. Roberts,Bose-Fermi duality and entanglement entropies,J. Stat. Mech.1302(2013) P02022 [1209.2428]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  72. [73]

    Coser, L

    A. Coser, L. Tagliacozzo and E. Tonni,On R´ enyi entropies of disjoint intervals in conformal field theory,J. Stat. Mech.1401(2014) P01008 [1309.2189]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  73. [74]

    Dijkgraaf, E.P

    R. Dijkgraaf, E.P. Verlinde and H.L. Verlinde,C = 1 Conformal Field Theories on Riemann Surfaces,Commun. Math. Phys.115(1988) 649

    1988

  74. [75]

    Cardy,Some results on the mutual information of disjoint regions in higher dimensions,J

    J. Cardy,Some results on the mutual information of disjoint regions in higher dimensions,J. Phys. A46(2013) 285402 [1304.7985]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  75. [76]

    Casini, E

    H. Casini, E. Test´ e and G. Torroba,Mutual information superadditivity and unitarity bounds, JHEP09(2021) 046 [2103.15847]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  76. [77]

    C.A. Agon, H. Casini, U. G¨ ursoy and G. Planella Planas,Mutual information from modular flow in CFTs,JHEP08(2025) 176 [2409.01406]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  77. [78]

    Ag´ on, P

    C.A. Ag´ on, P. Bueno, A.D. Piskin and G. van der Velde,Mutual Information from Modular Flow in General CFTs,2604.19860

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [79]

    B. Chen, L. Chen, P.-x. Hao and J. Long,On the Mutual Information in Conformal Field Theory,JHEP06(2017) 096 [1704.03692]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  79. [80]

    Casini, M

    H. Casini, M. Huerta and R.C. Myers,Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy,JHEP05(2011) 036 [1102.0440]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  80. [81]

    Ag´ on, H

    C.A. Ag´ on, H. Casini and P.J. Martinez,R´ enyi entropies in the n→0 limit and entanglement temperatures,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 105009 [2309.00044]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.