Recognition: 2 theorem links
· Lean TheoremStabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction
Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 22:00 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Stabilizer codes provide a group-theoretic framework that simplifies construction and analysis of quantum error-correcting codes.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
A group-theoretical structure and associated subclass of quantum codes, the stabilizer codes, has proved particularly fruitful in producing codes and in understanding the structure of both specific codes and classes of codes. The stabilizer formalism defines the code subspace as the common +1 eigenspace of an abelian subgroup of the Pauli group, which allows systematic error detection by measuring the stabilizers and supports analysis of channel capacities, bounds, and fault-tolerant gates.
What carries the argument
The stabilizer group: an abelian subgroup of the Pauli group whose common eigenspace forms the code subspace.
Load-bearing premise
That the group-theoretical structure of stabilizer codes applies broadly to quantum error correction without limitations from specific error models or hardware constraints.
What would settle it
A concrete set of quantum errors that a non-stabilizer code corrects but no abelian Pauli subgroup can detect and correct.
read the original abstract
Controlling operational errors and decoherence is one of the major challenges facing the field of quantum computation and other attempts to create specified many-particle entangled states. The field of quantum error correction has developed to meet this challenge. A group-theoretical structure and associated subclass of quantum codes, the stabilizer codes, has proved particularly fruitful in producing codes and in understanding the structure of both specific codes and classes of codes. I will give an overview of the field of quantum error correction and the formalism of stabilizer codes. In the context of stabilizer codes, I will discuss a number of known codes, the capacity of a quantum channel, bounds on quantum codes, and fault-tolerant quantum computation.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper provides an overview of quantum error correction, emphasizing the stabilizer formalism derived from group theory applied to Pauli operators. It constructs the stabilizer code framework, applies it to explicit examples including CSS codes and the 7-qubit Steane code, derives bounds on code parameters, discusses quantum channel capacity, and sketches fault-tolerant gate constructions using the formalism.
Significance. The stabilizer formalism introduced here has become foundational for constructing and classifying quantum codes, enabling systematic analysis of error correction in the abstract quantum channel model. The paper's derivations are parameter-free and internally consistent, with explicit group-theoretic constructions that support reproducible code generation and bound calculations; this has directly facilitated later developments in fault tolerance without reliance on ad-hoc assumptions.
minor comments (3)
- §2: The definition of the stabilizer group could include an explicit statement that it is an abelian subgroup of the Pauli group to avoid ambiguity for readers new to the formalism.
- §4.2, discussion of the 7-qubit code: The error-correction condition is stated but the explicit syndrome table is omitted; adding it would improve clarity without lengthening the manuscript substantially.
- References: Several early works on quantum codes (e.g., Shor 1995) are cited but the citation list would benefit from consistent formatting and inclusion of the full arXiv identifiers where applicable.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and the recommendation to accept. The review accurately captures the paper's focus on the stabilizer formalism as a group-theoretic tool for quantum error correction, including code construction, examples such as CSS and Steane codes, bounds, channel capacity, and fault tolerance.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity in the stabilizer formalism derivation
full rationale
The paper introduces the stabilizer code formalism by directly applying group theory to the Pauli operator group acting on quantum states, deriving commutation relations, code subspaces, and error correction conditions from first principles without any fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. Explicit constructions (such as CSS codes and the 7-qubit code) and bounds are obtained as consequences of these group-theoretic properties within the abstract quantum channel model. The derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- domain assumption Principles of quantum mechanics, including superposition, entanglement, and unitary evolution for describing states and errors.
- domain assumption Commuting sets of Pauli operators can define subspaces that are invariant under certain errors.
invented entities (1)
-
Stabilizer code
no independent evidence
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.DimensionForcingalexander_duality_circle_linking unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
I will give an overview of the field of quantum error correction and the formalism of stabilizer codes. In the context of stabilizer codes, I will discuss a number of known codes, the capacity of a quantum channel, bounds on quantum codes, and fault-tolerant quantum computation.
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Forward citations
Cited by 33 Pith papers
-
Topological subsystem bivariate bicycle codes with four-qubit check operators
Subsystem bivariate bicycle codes achieve high-rate BB logical qubits with local four-qubit gauge checks, yielding examples such as [[108,12,6]] that outperform surface-code alternatives.
-
An Exponential Advantage for Adaptive Tomography of Structured States under Pauli Basis Measurements
For an explicit prefix/tree family of quantum states, adaptive local Pauli tomography achieves polynomial copy complexity while non-adaptive strategies require exponentially many copies.
-
Gauss law codes and vacuum codes from lattice gauge theories
Gauss law codes identify the full gauge-invariant sector as the code space while vacuum codes restrict to the matter vacuum, with the two shown to be unitarily equivalent for finite gauge groups.
-
In-Situ Simultaneous Magic State Injection on Arbitrary CSS qLDPC Codes
A new in-situ scheme prepares logical magic states inside arbitrary CSS qLDPC codes using only syndrome-extraction ancillas, with simulations on the [[144,12,12]] BB code and [[225,9,4]] hypergraph-product code showin...
-
Univariate Bicycle Quantum LDPC Codes: Explicit Logical Structure and Distance Bounds
Univariate bicycle codes give an explicit basis for logical operators and distance upper bounds in a restricted class of quantum LDPC codes while matching the performance of less constrained generalized and bivariate ...
-
Zeno-Enhanced Probabilistic Error Cancellation with Quantum Error Detection Codes
Using post-selection to map physical noise to a weaker accepted logical channel and then applying order-K perturbative PEC reduces sampling overhead by 3-4 orders of magnitude for logical GHZ preparation on up to 200 ...
-
Distributed estimation of many-body Hamiltonians via punctured surface code
Punctured surface codes map disjoint or overlapping Z-couplings to a single logical Z for protected distributed estimation of many-body Hamiltonian parameters.
-
Multi-Qubit Stabilizer Readout on a Dual-Species Rydberg Array
Dual-species Na-Cs Rydberg array enables simultaneous non-destructive readout of multiple Pauli-Z stabilizers on four-qubit plaquettes using a single global pulse sequence after compensating geometric phase errors.
-
A measure for genuine tripartite entanglement
I(n1, n2) is a correlation functional with |I| ≤ 2 for any three-qubit state, saturated only for GHZ-equivalent states under mutually unbiased measurements.
-
Noise Reduction for Universal Hybrid Oscillator-Qubit Quantum Computation
Adding an ancilla qubit to GKP-stabilizer codes reduces Gaussian displacement noise standard deviation from σ to O(σ²) for universal hybrid CV-DV gates.
-
Harmoniq: Efficient Data Augmentation on a Quantum Computer Inspired by Harmonic Analysis
Harmoniq approximates a quantum-harmonic-analysis data augmentation operator as a mixture of at most quadratic-depth n-qubit circuits, enabling modular combination with other quantum subroutines for signal denoising.
-
Structural Obstruction to Replica Symmetry Breaking for Multi-Entropy in Random Tensor Networks
Multi-entropy exhibits a structural obstruction to replica symmetry breaking in random tensor networks due to incompatible boundary permutations in the replica hypercube, unlike entanglement negativity.
-
Sector length distributions of recursively definable graph states through analytic combinatorics
Closed-form sector length distributions for recursively definable graph states (paths, cycles, stars, grids) via generating functions, yielding analytical concentratable entanglement, depolarizing fidelity bounds, and...
-
Dismagicker: Unitary Gate for Non-Stabilizerness Reduction
Dismagicker is a non-Clifford unitary that suppresses non-stabilizerness in quantum states, improving simulation accuracy when combined with Clifford disentanglers.
-
Magic state cultivation: growing T states as cheap as CNOT gates
Magic state cultivation prepares high-fidelity T states with an order of magnitude fewer qubit-rounds than prior distillation methods by gradually growing them within a surface code under depolarizing noise.
-
Spatial overhead reduction for 2D hypergraph product codes
A qubit-reduction method for hypergraph product codes preserves dimension, distance, and fault-tolerance properties, producing smaller codes such as [[441,64,6]] from [[610,64,6]] with comparable noise performance and...
-
Protocol for Efficient Generation of Fusion-Based Quantum Computing Resource States from Quantum Emitters
Logically encoded 24-photon FBQC resource states can be deterministically produced from 3 quantum emitters and 11 CNOT gates by using symmetries to reduce the search over photon emission orderings.
-
Mid-Circuit Measurements for Clifford Noise Reduction in Hamiltonian Simulations
Mid-circuit stabilizer verification in six-qubit GSE-encoded Clifford Trotter steps reduces logical error rates by up to 54% on Barium ion hardware, with the gain vanishing if checks are deferred to circuit end.
-
Quantum Magic in early FTQC: From Diagonal Clifford Hierarchy No-Go Theorems to Architecture Design Blueprints
No-go theorems prove hierarchy level and state-independent sequences cannot maximize operational magic in early FTQC, requiring state-aware differentiable optimization and nonlinear phases for scalable magic generation.
-
Design and Analysis of Quantum Dual-Containing CSS LDPC Codes based on Quasi-Dyadic Matrices
Two new constructions of quantum dual-containing CSS LDPC codes from quasi-dyadic matrices yield high-rate codes with good cycle properties, automorphism groups, minimum distance, and superior finite-length performanc...
-
Design and Analysis of Quantum Dual-Containing CSS LDPC Codes based on Quasi-Dyadic Matrices
Two new constructions of quantum dual-containing CSS LDPC codes from quasi-dyadic matrices achieve improved finite-length error performance over existing DC codes.
-
Interplay of Nonstabilizerness and Ergotropy in Quantum Batteries
Ergotropy in the battery corresponds one-to-one with total nonstabilizerness under U(1)-symmetric charger-battery interactions, while maximum average charging power in Clifford evolution is achievable even with zero i...
-
Defect-Adaptive Lattice Surgery on Irregular Boundary Surface-Code Patches
A defect-adaptive lattice surgery technique reconstructs joint logical parities on irregular surface-code patches via GF(2) binary synthesis from seam measurements and pre-merge constraints, yielding executable rules ...
-
A graph-aware bounded distance decoder for all stabilizer codes
A graph-based bounded distance decoder corrects all errors up to a chosen weight in arbitrary stabilizer codes by representing stabilizers and syndromes as graphs and pruning the search space with a feed-forward structure.
-
Coherence dynamics in quantum many-body systems with conservation laws
Conservation laws in quantum circuits and Hamiltonians replace logarithmic coherence saturation with slow hydrodynamic relaxation globally and produce algebraic peak-time growth locally, unlike ergodic cases.
-
Deterministic generation of grid states with programmable nonlinear bosonic circuits
Programmable nonlinear bosonic circuits can deterministically produce phased-comb states that serve as a scalable bosonic quantum error-correcting code with near-optimal performance against boson loss.
-
GreenPeas: Unlocking Adaptive Quantum Error Correction with Just-in-Time Decoding Hypergraphs
GreenPeas delivers a just-in-time GPU compiler for decoding hypergraphs that achieves >10x speedup on surface and bivariate bicycle codes, unlocking circuit-level decoding for adaptive quantum error correction.
-
The Rotation Gap Is Not An Error: Ternary Structure in IBM Quantum Hardware
IBM quantum hardware has ternary error structure causing sub-Poissonian syndromes; a classifier decoder that skips correcting them cuts logical errors by 7-19%.
-
Error Correction in Lattice Quantum Electrodynamics with Quantum Reference Frames
Lattice QED is established as a quantum error-correcting code beyond stabilizers, with explicit recovery operations constructed via quantum reference frames for gauge and fermionic sectors.
-
Catalytic Quantum Error Correction: Theory, Efficient Catalyst Preparation, and Numerical Benchmarks
Catalytic Quantum Error Correction recovers known target states from noisy copies with F > 0.96 using only eight copies by preserving coherent modes and applying a CPMG-Clifford-swap-test pipeline, bypassing magnitude...
-
Graph-State Circuit Blocks control Entanglement and Scrambling Velocities
LC-inequivalent graph-state blocks in random Clifford circuits yield distinct entanglement velocities v_E and butterfly velocities v_B, correlated with internal entanglement distribution and graph connectivity.
-
Mid-Circuit Measurements for Clifford Noise Reduction in Hamiltonian Simulations
Mid-circuit measurements in Generalized Superfast Encoding combined with Clifford Noise Reduction reduce logical error rates by up to 54% in a six-qubit Clifford Trotter step for fermionic Hamiltonian simulation on ba...
-
Magic and Non-Clifford Gates in Topological Quantum Field Theory
Non-Clifford gates including Ising, Toffoli, and T arise as exact path integrals in Chern-Simons and Dijkgraaf-Witten topological quantum field theories.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
An unsolvable problem of elementary number t heory,
A. Church, “An unsolvable problem of elementary number t heory,” Amer. J. Math 58, 345 (1936); A. M. Turing, “On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem,” Proc. Lond. Mat h. Soc. (2) 42, 230 (1936) and Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 43, 544 (1937)
work page 1936
-
[2]
Simulating physics with computers,
R. P. Feynman, “Simulating physics with computers,” Int . J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467 (1982)
work page 1982
-
[3]
Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring,
P. Shor, “Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring,” Proceedings, 35th Annual Symposium on Fundame ntals of Computer Science, (1994)
work page 1994
-
[4]
A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for da tabase search,
L. K. Grover, “A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for da tabase search,” Proceedings, 28th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computation, 2 12 (1996)
work page 1996
-
[5]
Strengths and weaknesses of quantum computing,
C. B. Bennett, E. Bernstein, G. Brassard, and U. Vazirani , “Strengths and weaknesses of quantum computing,” quant-ph/9701001 (1997 )
-
[6]
Quantum computations with col d trapped ions,
J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, “Quantum computations with col d trapped ions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995)
work page 1995
-
[7]
Demonstration of a fundamental quantum logic gate,
C. Monroe, D. M. Meekhof, B. E. King, W. M. Itano, and D. J. W ineland, “Demonstration of a fundamental quantum logic gate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4714 (1995)
work page 1995
-
[8]
Measurement of conditional phase shifts for quantum logic ,
Q. A. Turchette, C. J. Hood, W. Lange, H. Mabuchi, and H. J. Kimble, “Measurement of conditional phase shifts for quantum logic ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4710 (1995)
work page 1995
-
[9]
Bulk spin resonance quant um computa- tion,
N. Gershenfeld and I. Chuang, “Bulk spin resonance quant um computa- tion,” Science 275, 350 (1997)
work page 1997
-
[10]
Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum me mory,
P. Shor, “Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum me mory,” Phys. Rev. A 52, 2493 (1995)
work page 1995
-
[11]
Error correcting codes in quantum theory ,
A. M. Steane, “Error correcting codes in quantum theory ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 793 (1996). BIBLIOGRAPHY 111
work page 1996
-
[12]
Cohen-Tannoudji, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, New York (1977)
C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, New York (1977)
work page 1977
-
[13]
F. J. MacWilliams and N. J. A. Sloane, The Theory of Error-Correcting Codes, North-Holland Publishing Company, New York (1977)
work page 1977
-
[14]
A single quantum cannot b e cloned,
W. K. Wootters and W. H. Zurek, “A single quantum cannot b e cloned,” Nature 299, 802 (1982)
work page 1982
-
[15]
A mathematical theory of communication ,
C. E. Shannon, “A mathematical theory of communication ,” Bell Sys. Tech. J. 27, 379, 623 (1948)
work page 1948
-
[16]
A theory of quantum error-corr ecting codes,
E. Knill and R. Laflamme, “A theory of quantum error-corr ecting codes,” Phys. Rev. A 55, 900 (1997)
work page 1997
-
[17]
Mixed state en- tanglement and quantum error correction,
C. Bennett, D. DiVincenzo, J. Smolin, and W. Wootters, “ Mixed state en- tanglement and quantum error correction,” Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996)
work page 1996
-
[18]
Error preve ntion scheme with four particles,
L. Vaidman, L. Goldenberg, and S. Wiesner, “Error preve ntion scheme with four particles,” Phys. Rev. A 54, 1745R (1996)
work page 1996
-
[19]
Codes for the quan tum erasure channel,
M. Grassl, Th. Beth, and T. Pellizzari, “Codes for the qu antum erasure channel,” quant-ph/9610042 (1996)
-
[20]
Ap proximate quantum error correction can lead to better codes,
D. W. Leung, M. A. Nielsen, I. L. Chuang, Y. Yamamoto, “Ap proximate quantum error correction can lead to better codes,” quant-p h/9704002 (1997)
-
[21]
Class of quantum error-correcting code s saturating the quantum Hamming bound,
D. Gottesman, “Class of quantum error-correcting code s saturating the quantum Hamming bound,” Phys. Rev. A 54, 1862 (1996)
work page 1996
-
[22]
Quantum error correction and orthogonal geometry,
A. R. Calderbank, E. M. Rains, P. W. Shor, and N. J. A. Sloa ne, “Quantum error correction and orthogonal geometry,” Phys. Rev. Lett . 78, 405 (1997)
work page 1997
-
[23]
E. Rains, “Quantum shadow enumerators,” quant-ph/961 1001 (1996)
work page 1996
-
[24]
Pefect qu antum error correction code,
R. Laflamme, C. Miquel, J. P. Paz, and W. Zurek, “Pefect qu antum error correction code,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 198 (1996)
work page 1996
-
[25]
D. Gottesman, “Pasting quantum codes,” quant-ph/9607 027 (1996)
work page 1996
-
[26]
Quantum error correction via codes over GF(4),
A. R. Calderbank, E. M. Rains, P. W. Shor, and N. J. A. Sloa ne, “Quantum error correction via codes over GF(4),” quant-ph/9608006 ( 1996)
-
[27]
Simple quantum error correcting codes,
A. Steane, “Simple quantum error correcting codes,” Ph ys. Rev. A 54, 4741 (1996)
work page 1996
-
[28]
A. Steane, “Quantum Reed-Muller codes, ” quant-ph/960 8026 (1996)
work page 1996
-
[29]
Good quantum error-cor recting codes exist,
A. R. Calderbank and P. W. Shor, “Good quantum error-cor recting codes exist,” Phys. Rev. A 54, 1098 (1996). BIBLIOGRAPHY 112
work page 1996
-
[30]
Multiple particle interference and quantu m error correction,
A. Steane, “Multiple particle interference and quantu m error correction,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 452, 2551 (1996)
work page 1996
-
[31]
Non-binary error bases and quantum codes,
E. Knill, “Non-binary error bases and quantum codes,” q uant-ph/9608048 (1996); E. Knill, “Group representations, error bases and q uantum codes,” quant-ph/9608049 (1996)
-
[32]
Correcting quantum errors in higher spin sy stems,
H. F. Chau, “Correcting quantum errors in higher spin sy stems,” quant- ph/9610023 (1996)
-
[33]
Five quantum register error correction cod e for higher spin systems,
H. F. Chau, “Five quantum register error correction cod e for higher spin systems,” quant-ph/9702033 (1997)
-
[34]
Fault-tolerant quantum com putation with constant error,
D. Aharonov and M. Ben-Or, “Fault-tolerant quantum com putation with constant error,” quant-ph/9611025 (1996)
-
[35]
E. Rains, “Nonbinary quantum codes,” quant-ph/970304 8 (1997)
work page 1997
-
[36]
Efficient computations of enc odings for quan- tum error correction,
R. Cleve and D. Gottesman, “Efficient computations of enc odings for quan- tum error correction,” quant-ph/9607030 (1996)
-
[37]
D. P. DiVincenzo, “Quantum gates and circuits,” quant- ph/9705009 (1997)
-
[38]
Fault-tolerant quantum computation,
P. Shor, “Fault-tolerant quantum computation,” quant -ph/9605011 (1996)
-
[39]
Fault-tolerant error corre ction with efficient quantum codes,
D. DiVincenzo and P. Shor, “Fault-tolerant error corre ction with efficient quantum codes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3260 (1996)
work page 1996
-
[40]
A theory of fault-tolerant quantum comp utation,
D. Gottesman, “A theory of fault-tolerant quantum comp utation,” quant- ph/9702029 (1997)
-
[41]
Teleporting an unknown quantum state via du al classical and Einstein-Podalsky-Rosen channels,
C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crepeau, R. Josza, A. Pere s, and W. K. Wootters, “Teleporting an unknown quantum state via du al classical and Einstein-Podalsky-Rosen channels,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993)
work page 1993
-
[42]
Purification of noisy entanglement and fait hful telepor- tation via noisy channels,
C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, S. Popescu, B. Schumacher, J . A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, “Purification of noisy entanglement and fait hful telepor- tation via noisy channels,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 722 (1996)
work page 1996
- [43]
- [44]
-
[45]
E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and W. Zurek, “Accuracy threshold for quan- tum computation,” quant-ph/9610011 (1996); E. Knill, R. La flamme, and W. Zurek, “Resilient quantum computation: error models and thresholds,” quant-ph/9702058 (1997)
- [46]
-
[47]
Active stabilization, quantum computat ion and quantum state synthesis,
A. M. Steane, “Active stabilization, quantum computat ion and quantum state synthesis,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2252 (1997)
work page 1997
-
[48]
E. Knill and R. Laflamme, “Concatenated quantum codes,” quant-ph/ 9608012 (1996)
work page 1996
-
[49]
Threshold estimate for fault tolerant quant um computing,
C. Zalka, “Threshold estimate for fault tolerant quant um computing,” quant-ph/9612028 (1996)
-
[50]
The capacity of a noisy quantum channel,
S. Lloyd, “The capacity of a noisy quantum channel,” Phy s. Rev. A 55, 1613 (1997)
work page 1997
-
[51]
Quantum data processi ng and error correction,
B. Schumacher and M. A. Nielsen, “Quantum data processi ng and error correction,” Phys. Rev. A 54, 2629 (1996)
work page 1996
-
[52]
Informati on transmission through a noisy quantum channel,
H. Barnum, M. A. Nielsen, and B. Schumacher, “Informati on transmission through a noisy quantum channel,” quant-ph/9702049 (1997)
-
[53]
Error correction in quan tum communica- tion,
A. Ekert and C. Macchiavello, “Error correction in quan tum communica- tion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2585 (1996)
work page 1996
-
[54]
Information-theoretic interp retation of quantum error-correcting codes,
N. J. Cerf and R. Cleve, “Information-theoretic interp retation of quantum error-correcting codes,” quant-ph/9702031 (1997)
-
[55]
Quantum analog of the MacWillia ms identities for classical coding theory,
P. Shor and R. Laflamme, “Quantum analog of the MacWillia ms identities for classical coding theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1600 (1997)
work page 1997
-
[56]
E. M. Rains, “Quantum weight enumerators,” quant-ph/9 612015 (1996)
work page 1996
-
[57]
Polynomial invariants of quantum codes,
E. M. Rains, “Polynomial invariants of quantum codes,” quant-ph/9704042 (1997)
-
[58]
Quantum stabilizer codes and classical line ar vodes,
R. Cleve, “Quantum stabilizer codes and classical line ar vodes,” quant- ph/9612048 (1996)
-
[59]
Capac ities of quantum erasure channels,
C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, and J. A. Smolin, “Capac ities of quantum erasure channels,” quant-ph/9701015 (1997)
- [60]
-
[61]
Quantum error-correcting codes need not com- pletely reveal the error syndrome,
P. Shor and J. Smolin, “Quantum error-correcting codes need not com- pletely reveal the error syndrome,” quant-ph/9604006 (199 6)
-
[62]
Quantum codes of minimum distance two,
E. M. Rains, “Quantum codes of minimum distance two,” qu ant-ph/ 9704043 (1997)
work page 1997
-
[63]
E. M. Rains, R. H. Hardin, P. W. Shor, and N. J. A. Sloane, “ A nonadditive quantum code,” quant-ph/9703002 (1997)
-
[64]
Almost any quantum logic gate is universal,
S. Lloyd, “Almost any quantum logic gate is universal,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 346 (1995). BIBLIOGRAPHY 114
work page 1995
-
[65]
Elementa ry gates for quantum computation,
A. Barenco, C. H. Bennett, R. Cleve, D. P. DiVincenzo, N. Margolus, P. Shor, T. Sleator, J. Smolin, and H. Weinfurter, “Elementa ry gates for quantum computation,” Phys. Rev. A 52, 3457 (1995)
work page 1995
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.