Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 98 references

A post-inflationary stiff era lets primordial magnetic fields produce a dominant, detectable gravitational-wave signal via scalar perturbations.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 16:44 UTC pith:GRMHE2TT

load-bearing objection Useful constant-w extension of PMF-sourced scalars, but the claimed SIGW dominance rests on an unquantified connected stress four-point function. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.17875 v1 pith:GRMHE2TT submitted 2026-07-20 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph

Magnetically assisted primordial scalar perturbations: Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves

Arko Bhaumik , Theodoros Papanikolaou , Anish Ghoshal This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph MSC 83C3583F05
keywords primordial magnetic fieldsscalar-induced gravitational wavesBardeen potentialreheating equation of statekinationsecond-order cosmological perturbation theoryanisotropic stressstochastic gravitational-wave background
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that primordial magnetic fields can leave a gravitational-wave imprint through a two-step, second-order channel: the field's anisotropic stress first sources scalar metric perturbations, and those scalars then induce gravitational waves at second order. The authors generalize the sourced scalar evolution to a finite post-inflationary epoch with constant equation of state w, showing superhorizon growth is faster than logarithmic for w>1/3 and slower for w<1/3. They find a narrow but viable parameter region — a kination-like era lasting 8–10 e-folds with a nearly scale-invariant magnetic spectrum — where this scalar-induced background dominates over the direct first-order magnetic tensor signal and could be detected by next-generation interferometers from mHz to kHz. If true, this makes primordial magnetic fields and the reheating equation of state jointly observable, and shows that the induced-GW mechanism need not rely on primordial curvature perturbations.

Core claim

The central claim is that PMF-sourced scalar perturbations, evolving through a stiff post-inflationary background, act as efficient seeds for second-order gravitational waves, and that in a narrow parameter window the resulting signal outshines the direct tensor emission from the same magnetic field. Concretely, for w tending to 1, about 8–10 e-folds of reheating, and a nearly scale-invariant non-helical PMF with initial magnetic-to-background ratio around 10^-14.8 (or 10^-18 for longer reheating), the SIGW spectrum reaches amplitudes with projected SNR above 10 at DECIGO, BBO, or ET, while satisfying backreaction and perturbativity bounds. The paper also derives the general sourced evolutio

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the magnetic anisotropic stress, the traceless part of the magnetic stress-energy tensor normalized by the background energy density. Since it scales as a power of the scale factor with exponent controlled by w, it grows with time for w>1/3 and decays for w<1/3. The paper derives a gauge-invariant second-order ODE for the Bardeen potential with this stress as the source, factorizes the solution into a time-independent mode amplitude times transfer functions, and feeds those transfer functions into the second-order tensor source to compute the SIGW spectrum. The disconnected-Wick approximation for the stress four-point function is what makes the semi-analytic estima

Load-bearing premise

The claimed signal size and channel dominance rest on the approximation that the four-point function of the magnetic anisotropic stress is only its disconnected part; connected corrections, which the paper explicitly leaves out, could change the overall normalization and spectral shape.

What would settle it

Compute, for a Gaussian PMF with the same power spectrum, the full connected trispectrum contribution to the induced GW two-point function and compare its magnitude to the disconnected result. If it shifts the SIGW amplitude by more than an order of magnitude, or if it changes the relative size of the SIGW and first-order channels, the claimed dominance and detectability are not robust. Alternatively, a post-reheating MHD simulation of the same magnetic configuration would test whether the later plasma era amplifies or suppresses the pre-radiation contribution.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A detection of this SIGW background would imply a stiff (kination-like) post-inflationary epoch with a nearly scale-invariant PMF, since the dominant channel requires both.
  • The induced channel scales as the fourth power of the initial magnetic-to-background ratio, while the direct channel scales quadratically, so weak PMFs favor direct emission and only sufficiently strong PMFs can make the SIGW channel visible.
  • Because the two channels have nearly identical spectral tilts, a measured background alone may not reveal whether it is first- or second-order; independent probes of the PMF spectrum would be needed to break the degeneracy.
  • The backreaction condition that the GW energy density stay well below the magnetic energy density selects a narrow band of parameters; pushing beyond it requires a non-perturbative treatment of the coupled Einstein-Maxwell system.
  • The formalism applies to any subdominant anisotropic-stress sector surviving between inflation and radiation domination, not just magnetic fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The disconnected-Wick approximation likely underestimates or reshapes the SIGW spectrum; a full connected trispectrum calculation is the natural next check and could move the signal in or out of detectability.
  • MHD turbulence after reheating, neglected here, could modify both channels on large scales and may break the spectral-tilt degeneracy, changing the forecasted SNR.
  • Because the magnetic field sources scalars quadratically, the scalar sector will be non-Gaussian even for a Gaussian PMF; higher-order statistics of the induced background could provide a new consistency test.
  • The same 'stiff background amplifies anisotropic-stress sourcing' mechanism might apply to other vector or tensor sources, such as vector fields or cosmic strings carrying anisotropic stress.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper develops a framework for scalar metric perturbations sourced by a primordial magnetic field (PMF) during a constant equation-of-state (w) post-inflationary epoch. It derives a sourced Bardeen-potential equation, shows that the w=1/3 radiation-dominated result is recovered, and constructs analytic transfer functions for the PMF-sourced curvature perturbation. It then computes the second-order scalar-induced gravitational wave (SIGW) background from these sourced scalars, compares it with the direct first-order PMF tensor signal, and identifies a narrow kination-like (w→1) parameter region, with n_B≈-2.95 and specific magnetic-to-background ratios, where the SIGW channel dominates and is claimed to be detectable by DECIGO/BBO/ET/CE. The paper also imposes backreaction and perturbativity conditions and presents SNR estimates for six benchmarks.

Significance. If the quantitative estimates hold, the paper identifies a genuinely new and interesting channel: PMF anisotropic stress sources scalar perturbations, which in turn induce gravitational waves at second order, with different parametric dependence on w than the direct tensor channel. The derivation of the sourced Bardeen equation, the explicit reduction to the known w=1/3 limit, and the analytic form of the transfer functions are strong and transparent. The paper is also unusually careful in stating its approximations, including the disconnected-stress truncation, the truncation of spectra at reheating, and the neglect of post-reheating MHD and neutrino compensation. The main weakness is that the central amplitude—and hence the claimed dominance and detectability—rests on an unquantified connected stress trispectrum correction, which the authors acknowledge but do not bound. Thus the result is best viewed as a controlled order-of-magnitude estimate whose central quantitative claim needs further support before being considered established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.10)] The central SIGW amplitude is computed using only disconnected Wick contractions of the effective magnetic stress. Because Π_B is quadratic in B_i, even a Gaussian PMF has a nonzero connected stress trispectrum; the text itself states that this 'would correct the overall normalization and possibly the detailed shape' of the induced spectrum, but gives no size estimate or bound. The SIGW spectrum enters at fourth order in the magnetic-to-background ratio, so an O(1) connected contribution directly rescales Ω_SIGW and the Table 4 SNR values—for example, the DECIGO SNR of ~50.28 would fall below 10 under a suppression factor of only ~0.2—and could invert the claimed dominance over the direct tensor channel. Please provide a quantitative estimate or bound for the connected trispectrum contribution, or explicitly reformulate the detectability claim as a leading-order estimate subject to this
  2. [Sec. 4, Figs. 3–4, Table 4] The GW spectra are truncated at η_reh and described as 'controlled pre-radiation contributions rather than final all-era predictions.' The text further notes that post-reheating MHD turbulence, turbulent decorrelation, and neutrino compensation 'need not act as a simple overall enhancement.' Because the abstract and conclusion advertise SNR>10 at future detectors, the quoted SNR values are not full predictions of the final GW background at the present epoch. Either compute or estimate the post-reheating contribution, or present Table 4 explicitly as a pre-reheating, pre-MHD contribution and adjust the abstract and conclusion wording so that the detectability claim is not overstated.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, around Eq. (3.7)] The sentence 'The expression below is the scalar-scalar part...' is a fragment that interrupts the text; it should be integrated into the surrounding prose.
  2. [Eq. (3.2)] The display of the integration limits is garbled ('+1' and '−1' appear as superscripts); rewrite as ∫_{k_IR}^{k_UV} ... ∫_{-1}^{1} dμ.
  3. [Table 4] The 'N/A' entries for H_inf=10^9 GeV at DECIGO/BBO should be explained (presumably the signal band does not overlap the detector sensitivity), or replaced with explicit upper limits.
  4. [References] Reference [68] appears to duplicate [59]; one duplicate should be removed.
  5. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (4.3)–(4.4)] The fit ranges used for the quoted slopes are described only as 'the displayed subhorizon interval'; specify the exact frequency boundaries and state whether the fits are over log-spaced points or the plotted envelopes.
  6. [Footnote 3 and Sec. 4] The notation B(η_B)^2/ρ_w(η_B) is called a 'magnetic-to-background ratio' but the footnote clarifies it is not the true magnetic energy fraction. Consider introducing a distinct symbol (e.g., ε_B) to avoid confusion when comparing with Ω_B(η_reh).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the sourced-scalar and SIGW derivations are self-contained; the main caveats are omitted connected trispectrum terms and uncertain post-reheating physics, not input-output identity.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. Sec. 2 obtains the sourced Bardeen equation (2.9)/(2.19) from the linearized Einstein equations (2.3)-(2.6) for a constant-w background; the time dependence of the normalized stress, Π_B(η)∝η^{2(3w-1)/(1+3w)}, is an explicitly stated scaling input (ρ_B∝a^-4 vs ρ_w∝a^-3(1+w)), not a fitted target. The RD limit recovers the known Shaw-Lewis logarithmic growth, an external anchor. The SIGW calculation in Eq. (3.10) follows the standard second-order tensor formalism with an explicit Green's function (3.9) and transfer functions defined by Eq. (2.22); the channel comparison (Eqs. 3.10 vs 3.14) is a genuine convolution of different powers of the same stress spectrum with different kernels. The only self-citation in a numerically load-bearing position is ref. [41] for the first-order PMF tensor spectrum (Eq. 3.12); that formula is a standard, externally derivable baseline and does not contain the paper's new SIGW claim, so it does not make the argument circular. The acknowledged omission of the connected stress trispectrum (Sec. 3.2: 'The connected stress trispectrum would correct the overall normalization and possibly the detailed shape of the induced spectrum; its inclusion requires a dedicated higher-order magnetic correlator calculation') and the truncation at η_reh ('controlled pre-radiation contributions rather than final all-era predictions') are genuine robustness/validity limitations, but they are uncertainties in an approximation, not a reduction of the output to the input. No step is definitionally equal to its input, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness claim is imported from the authors' prior work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central predictions depend on several chosen input parameters (w, N_reh, H_inf, n_B, initial magnetic fraction) and on modeling assumptions about the magnetic field's evolution and statistical properties. No new particles, forces, or other invented entities are introduced. The benchmark magnetic fractions are tuned near the perturbativity edge, so the 'narrow viable region' is partly a consequence of the chosen inputs and imposed consistency conditions, not of a parameter-free prediction.

free parameters (5)
  • equation of state w = 1 (kination) for benchmarks; general 0<w<1 considered
    Controls the background expansion and the time dependence of the normalized magnetic stress; w→1 is required to satisfy all four viability criteria simultaneously.
  • reheating duration N_reh = 8 or 10 e-folds
    Longer durations extend superhorizon sourcing but force a smaller initial magnetic fraction to stay within the perturbativity bound.
  • inflationary Hubble scale H_inf = 10^3, 10^5, and 10^9 GeV
    Sets the comoving horizon scales k_inf and k_reh, and therefore the frequency band of the predicted GW spectra.
  • magnetic spectral index n_B = -2.95
    A nearly scale-invariant PMF spectrum; close to the n_B→-3 limit where cutoff terms regulate the divergence.
  • initial magnetic-to-background ratio B(η_B)^2/ρ_w(η_B) = 10^-14.8 (N_reh=8) and 10^-18.0 (N_reh=10)
    Chosen near the largest values allowed by backreaction and the nG-level present-day PMF bound, in order to make the SIGW signal detectable.
axioms (7)
  • standard math First-order perturbed Einstein equations with a barotropic fluid and c_s^2=w govern the Bardeen potentials.
    Used to derive the sourced ODE Eq. (2.19) from Eqs. (2.3)-(2.6); standard general-relativistic perturbation theory.
  • domain assumption Entropy perturbations are neglected during the post-inflationary epoch.
    Stated in Sec. 2.2 and Sec. 5: 'entropy perturbations have been neglected'; the fluid is treated as barotropic.
  • domain assumption The PMF is non-helical, switches on instantaneously at η_B=η_inf, and redshifts as ρ_B ∝ a^-4 with no plasma or MHD compensation before reheating.
    Sec. 2.2 and Sec. 4; this fixes the sourced-stress time dependence Π_B ∝ η^{2(3w-1)/(1+3w)} used throughout the paper.
  • domain assumption Primordial small-scale scalar perturbations are ignored; the PMF-sourced component starts from Φ(η_B)=ζ(η_B)=0.
    Sec. 2.2 and Appendix A: mode-matching conditions isolate the magnetically sourced scalar channel.
  • ad hoc to paper The four-point function of the magnetic anisotropic stress is approximated by disconnected Wick contractions only.
    Sec. 3.2: the authors explicitly retain only disconnected contractions and state that the connected trispectrum would correct normalization and possibly shape.
  • domain assumption The hierarchy Ω_SIGW + Ω_FO << Ω_B holds at the end of reheating.
    Sec. 3.5 Eq. (3.16) is used to select viable benchmarks; Table 3 shows ratios up to ~0.25, making the hierarchy only approximate.
  • domain assumption The subhorizon approximation k ≫ H(η) is valid at η_reh for all modes entering the GW abundance.
    Eq. (3.15) in Sec. 3.5; the analysis is restricted to k ≥ k_reh, explicitly excluding larger scales.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 33556 in / 13538 out tokens · 132762 ms · 2026-08-01T16:44:45.669369+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Primordial magnetic fields (PMFs) provide a well-motivated source of cosmological perturbations through their anisotropic stress and may leave observable imprints in both the scalar and tensor sectors. In this work, we study scalar metric perturbations sourced by a PMF evolving through a finite post-inflationary epoch characterized by a constant equation-of-state (EoS) parameter $w$. Working in a gauge-invariant framework, we derive the sourced evolution equation for the Bardeen gravitational potential in a general constant-$w$ background. Our analysis indicates faster (slower) growth of PMF-sourced scalar perturbations on superhorizon scales for a stiffer $w>1/3$ (softer $w<1/3$) background compared to the marginal radiation-dominated scenario with $w=1/3$. We then derive the scalar-induced gravitational wave (SIGW) background induced at second order by the magnetically generated scalar perturbations. Our analysis indicates a narrow viable parametric region for a kination-like post-inflationary era and a nearly scale-invariant PMF that may give rise to a PMF-sourced SIGW signal dominating over the direct PMF-generated tensor background. Simultaneously, the induced tensor modes are found to be perturbatively small compared to the magnetic sector, which, in turn, exerts negligible backreaction on the background. Interestingly enough, for an inflationary scale $H_{\rm inf}\sim10^3-10^9$ GeV and duration of reheating in $e$-folds $N_{\rm reh}\sim8-10$, the dominant PMF-sourced SIGW signal may be detectable by next-generation terrestrial and space-based interferometric GW detectors spanning the mHz$-$kHz frequency range.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 89 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Vallée,Cosmic magnetic fields - as observed in the Universe, in galactic dynamos, and in the Milky Way,New Astronomy Reviews48(2004) 763

    J.P. Vallée,Cosmic magnetic fields - as observed in the Universe, in galactic dynamos, and in the Milky Way,New Astronomy Reviews48(2004) 763

    2004

  2. [2]

    Van Eck, J.C

    C.L. Van Eck, J.C. Brown, J.M. Stil, K. Rae, S.A. Mao, B.M. Gaensler et al.,Modeling the Magnetic Field in the Galactic Disk Using New Rotation Measure Observations from the Very Large Array,Astrophys. J.728(2011) 97 [1012.2938]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  3. [3]

    O’Sullivan, J

    S.P. O’Sullivan, J. Machalski, C.L. Van Eck, G. Heald, M. Brüggen, J.P.U. Fynbo et al.,The intergalactic magnetic field probed by a giant radio galaxy,Astron. Astrophys.622(2019) A16 [1811.07934]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    Neronov and I

    A. Neronov and I. Vovk,Evidence for strong extragalactic magnetic fields from Fermi observations of TeV blazars,Science328(2010) 73

    2010

  5. [5]

    Dolag, M

    K. Dolag, M. Kachelriess, S. Ostapchenko and R. Tomàs,Lower Limit on the Strength and Filling Factor of Extragalactic Magnetic Fields,Astrophys. J. Lett.727(2011) L4 [1009.1782]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    Tiede, A.E

    P. Tiede, A.E. Broderick, M. Shalaby, C. Pfrommer, E. Puchwein, P. Chang et al.,Constraints on the Intergalactic Magnetic Field from Bow Ties in the Gamma-ray Sky,1702.02586

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Turner and L.M

    M.S. Turner and L.M. Widrow,Inflation-produced, large-scale magnetic fields,Phys. Rev. D 37(1988) 2743

    1988

  8. [8]

    Ratra,Cosmological ‘seed’ magnetic field from inflation,Astrophys

    B. Ratra,Cosmological ‘seed’ magnetic field from inflation,Astrophys. J. Lett.391(1992) L1

    1992

  9. [9]

    Widrow,Origin of galactic and extragalactic magnetic fields,Rev

    L.M. Widrow,Origin of galactic and extragalactic magnetic fields,Rev. Mod. Phys.74(2002) 775 [astro-ph/0207240]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  10. [10]

    Durrer and A

    R. Durrer and A. Neronov,Cosmological magnetic fields: Their generation, evolution and observation,Astron. Astrophys. Rev.21(2013) 62 [1303.7121]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  11. [12]

    Sethi and K

    S.K. Sethi and K. Subramanian,Primordial magnetic fields in the post-recombination era and early reionization,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.356(2005) 778 [astro-ph/0405413]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  12. [13]

    Shaw and A

    J.R. Shaw and A. Lewis,Constraining primordial magnetism,Physical Review D86(2012) 043510 [1006.4242]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  13. [14]

    Durrer,Cosmic Magnetic Fields and the CMB,New Astron

    R. Durrer,Cosmic Magnetic Fields and the CMB,New Astron. Rev.51(2007) 275 [astro-ph/0609216]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  14. [16]

    Kunze and E

    K.E. Kunze and E. Komatsu,Constraining primordial magnetic fields with distortions of the black-body spectrum of the cosmic microwave background: pre- and post-decoupling contributions,JCAP01(2014) 009 [1309.7994]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  15. [17]

    Ferreira, R.K

    R.J.Z. Ferreira, R.K. Jain and M.S. Sloth,Inflationary Magnetogenesis without the Strong Coupling Problem II: Constraints from CMB anisotropies and B-modes,JCAP06(2014) 053 [1403.5516]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  16. [18]

    Planck Collaboration,Planck 2015 results. xix. constraints on primordial magnetic fields, Astron. Astrophys.594(2016) A19 [1502.01594]. – 32 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  17. [19]

    Zucca, Y

    A. Zucca, Y. Li and L. Pogosian,Constraints on Primordial Magnetic Fields from Planck combined with the South Pole Telescope CMB B-mode polarization measurements,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 063506 [1611.00757]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  18. [20]

    Jedamzik and L

    K. Jedamzik and L. Pogosian,Relieving the hubble tension with primordial magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 181302 [2004.09487]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  19. [21]

    E.-j. Kim, A. Olinto and R. Rosner,Generation of density perturbations by primordial magnetic fields,Astrophys. J.468(1996) 28 [astro-ph/9412070]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  20. [22]

    Kahniashvili, Y

    T. Kahniashvili, Y. Maravin, A. Natarajan, N. Battaglia and A.G. Tevzadze,Constraining primordial magnetic fields through large scale structure,Astrophys. J.770(2013) 47 [1211.2769]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  21. [23]

    Kunze,Magnetic field back reaction on the matter power spectrum,JCAP09(2022) 047 [2207.09859]

    K.E. Kunze,Magnetic field back reaction on the matter power spectrum,JCAP09(2022) 047 [2207.09859]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  22. [24]

    Adi, H.A.G

    T. Adi, H.A.G. Cruz and M. Kamionkowski,Primordial density perturbations from magnetic fields,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 023521 [2306.11319]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [25]

    Ralegankar, E

    P. Ralegankar, E. Garaldi and M. Viel,Matter power spectrum induced by primordial magnetic fields: from the linear to the non-linear regime,JCAP08(2025) 011 [2410.02676]

    arXiv 2025

  24. [26]

    Tashiro and N

    H. Tashiro and N. Sugiyama,Probing Primordial Magnetic Fields with the 21cm Fluctuations, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.372(2006) 1060 [astro-ph/0607169]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  25. [27]

    Schleicher, R

    D.R.G. Schleicher, R. Banerjee and R.S. Klessen,Influence of primordial magnetic fields on 21 cm emission,Astrophys. J.692(2009) 236 [0808.1461]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  26. [28]

    Kunze,21 cm line signal from magnetic modes,JCAP01(2019) 033 [1805.10943]

    K.E. Kunze,21 cm line signal from magnetic modes,JCAP01(2019) 033 [1805.10943]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [29]

    Minoda, H

    T. Minoda, H. Tashiro and T. Takahashi,Insight into primordial magnetic fields from 21-cm line observation with EDGES experiment,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.488(2019) 2001 [1812.00730]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [30]

    Bera, K.K

    A. Bera, K.K. Datta and S. Samui,Primordial magnetic fields during the cosmic dawn in light of EDGES 21-cm signal,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.498(2020) 918 [2005.14206]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  29. [31]

    H.A.G. Cruz, T. Adi, J. Flitter, M. Kamionkowski and E.D. Kovetz,21-cm fluctuations from primordial magnetic fields,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 023518 [2308.04483]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [32]

    Bhaumik, D

    A. Bhaumik, D. Paul and S. Pal,Revisiting primordial magnetic fields through 21-cm physics: bounds and forecasts,JCAP01(2025) 089 [2407.11923]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [33]

    Pavičević, V

    M. Pavičević, V. Iršič, M. Viel, J.S. Bolton, M.G. Haehnelt, S. Martin-Alvarez et al., Constraints on Primordial Magnetic Fields from the Lyman-αForest,Phys. Rev. Lett.135 (2025) 071001 [2501.06299]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [34]

    Bhaumik, S

    A. Bhaumik, S. Pal and S. Pal,Primordial magnetic fields in the light of upcoming post-EoR Lyman-αand 21-cm observations,2604.07327

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [35]

    A. Mack, T. Kahniashvili and A. Kosowsky,Microwave background signatures of a primordial stochastic magnetic field,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 123004 [astro-ph/0105504]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  34. [36]

    Sharma, K

    R. Sharma, K. Subramanian and T.R. Seshadri,Gravitational wave generation in a viable scenario of inflationary magnetogenesis,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 103526 [1912.12089]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  35. [37]

    Brandenburg, Y

    A. Brandenburg, Y. He and R. Sharma,Simulations of Helical Inflationary Magnetogenesis and Gravitational Waves,Astrophys. J.922(2021) 192 [2107.12333]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  36. [38]

    Maiti, D

    S. Maiti, D. Maity and L. Sriramkumar,Constraining inflationary magnetogenesis and reheating via GWs in light of PTA data,2401.01864. – 33 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [39]

    Atkins, D

    B. Atkins, D. Chowdhury, A. Marriott-Best and G. Tasinato,Inflationary magnetogenesis beyond slow-roll and its induced gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 063534 [2507.01772]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [40]

    Maiti,Magnetogenesis from a sawtooth coupling: Gravitational wave probe of reheating, Phys

    S. Maiti,Magnetogenesis from a sawtooth coupling: Gravitational wave probe of reheating, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 043536 [2506.06183]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [41]

    Bhaumik, T

    A. Bhaumik, T. Papanikolaou and A. Ghoshal,Vector induced gravitational waves sourced by primordial magnetic fields,JCAP08(2025) 054 [2504.10477]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [42]

    Teuscher, R

    M. Teuscher, R. Durrer, K. Martineau and A. Barrau,Gravitational waves sourced by gauge fields during inflation,JCAP03(2026) 043 [2510.00869]

    arXiv 2026

  41. [43]

    Teuscher, R

    M. Teuscher, R. Durrer, K. Martineau and A. Barrau,A universal scaling law for gravitational waves induced during inflation,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 103545 [2512.14670]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  42. [44]

    Maiti,Gravitational Waves from Post-Inflationary Magnetism: Direct and Scalar-Induced Contributions,2605.24715

    S. Maiti,Gravitational Waves from Post-Inflationary Magnetism: Direct and Scalar-Induced Contributions,2605.24715

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [45]

    Ragavendra, G

    H.V. Ragavendra, G. Tasinato and L. Sriramkumar,Chiral gravitational waves from multiphase magnetogenesis,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 103547 [2602.16575]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  44. [47]

    Caprini and R

    C. Caprini and R. Durrer,Gravitational wave production: A strong constraint on primordial magnetic fields,Phys. Rev. D65(2001) 023517 [astro-ph/0106244]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  45. [49]

    Ananda, C

    K.N. Ananda, C. Clarkson and D. Wands,The cosmological gravitational wave background from primordial density perturbations,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 123518 [gr-qc/0612013]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  46. [52]

    Domènech,Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review,Universe7(2021) 398 [2109.01398]

    G. Domènech,Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review,Universe7(2021) 398 [2109.01398]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  47. [53]

    Saito and J

    R. Saito and J. Yokoyama,Gravitational-wave constraints on the abundance of primordial black holes,Prog. Theor. Phys.123(2010) 867 [0912.5317]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  48. [54]

    Espinosa, D

    J.R. Espinosa, D. Racco and A. Riotto,A cosmological signature of the standard model higgs instability: gravitational waves,JCAP09(2018) 012 [1804.07731]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [55]

    R.-g. Cai, S. Pi and M. Sasaki,Gravitational Waves Induced by non-Gaussian Scalar Perturbations,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 201101 [1810.11000]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  50. [56]

    Bartolo, V

    N. Bartolo, V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, M. Peloso, D. Racco and A. Riotto,Testing primordial black holes as dark matter with LISA,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 103521 [1810.12224]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [57]

    Yuan, Z.-C

    C. Yuan, Z.-C. Chen and Q.-G. Huang,Probing primordial–black-hole dark matter with scalar induced gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 8 [1906.11549]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  52. [58]

    Pi and M

    S. Pi and M. Sasaki,Gravitational waves induced by scalar perturbations with a lognormal peak,JCAP09(2020) 037 [2005.12306]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  53. [60]

    Y.-F. Cai, C. Chen, X. Tong, D.-G. Wang and S.-F. Yan,When Primordial Black Holes from Sound Speed Resonance Meet a Stochastic Background of Gravitational Waves,Phys. Rev. D 100(2019) 043518 [1902.08187]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [61]

    Bhattacharya, S

    S. Bhattacharya, S. Mohanty and P. Parashari,Primordial black holes and gravitational waves in nonstandard cosmologies,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 043522 [1912.01653]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  55. [62]

    Zhou, Y.-T

    J.-Z. Zhou, Y.-T. Kuang, D. Wu, F.-Y. Chen, H. Lü and Z. Chang,Scalar induced gravitational waves in f(R) gravity,JCAP12(2024) 021 [2409.07702]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  56. [63]

    Maity, N

    S. Maity, N. Bhaumik, M.R. Haque, D. Maity and L. Sriramkumar,Constraining the history of reheating with the NANOGrav 15-year data,JCAP01(2025) 118 [2403.16963]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [64]

    Kugarajh, M

    A.A. Kugarajh, M. Traforetti, A. Maselli, S. Matarrese and A. Ricciardone,Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves in Modified Gravity,2502.20137

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [65]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin,Encyclopaedia inflationaris,Phys. Dark Univ.5-6 (2014) 75 [1303.3787]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  59. [66]

    J.L. Cook, E. Dimastrogiovanni, D.A. Easson and L.M. Krauss,Reheating predictions in single field inflation,JCAP04(2015) 047 [1502.04673]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  60. [67]

    L. Dai, M. Kamionkowski and J. Wang,Reheating constraints to inflationary models,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 041302 [1404.6704]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  61. [68]

    Domènech,Induced gravitational waves in a general cosmological background,Int

    G. Domènech,Induced gravitational waves in a general cosmological background,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D29(2020) 2050028 [1912.05583]. [69]EPTAcollaboration,European Pulsar Timing Array Limits On An Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.453(2015) 2576 [1504.03692]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  62. [70]

    Shannon et al.,Gravitational waves from binary supermassive black holes missing in pulsar observations,Science349(2015) 1522 [1509.07320]

    R.M. Shannon et al.,Gravitational waves from binary supermassive black holes missing in pulsar observations,Science349(2015) 1522 [1509.07320]. [71]NANOGra vcollaboration,The NANOGrav Nine-year Data Set: Limits on the Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background,Astrophys. J.821(2016) 13 [1508.03024]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  63. [72]

    Qin, K.K

    W. Qin, K.K. Boddy, M. Kamionkowski and L. Dai,Pulsar-timing arrays, astrometry, and gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 063002 [1810.02369]. [73]LISAcollaboration,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,1702.00786

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  64. [74]

    Ruan, Z.-K

    W.-H. Ruan, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai and Y.-Z. Zhang,Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35(2020) 2050075 [1807.09495]. [75]TianQincollaboration,TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector,Class. Quant. Grav.33(2016) 035010 [1512.02076]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  65. [76]

    N. Seto, S. Kawamura and T. Nakamura,Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space, Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 221103 [astro-ph/0108011]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  66. [77]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Seto,Detector configuration of DECIGO/BBO and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 044011 [1101.3940]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  67. [78]

    Kawamura, M

    S. Kawamura, M. Ando, N. Seto, S. Sato, T. Nakamura et al.,The japanese space gravitational wave antenna: Decigo,Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011) 094011

    2011

  68. [79]

    Badurina et al.,AION: An Atom Interferometer Observatory and Network,JCAP05 (2020) 011 [1911.11755]

    L. Badurina et al.,AION: An Atom Interferometer Observatory and Network,JCAP05 (2020) 011 [1911.11755]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  69. [80]

    Punturo, M

    M. Punturo, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, B. Allen, N. Andersson et al.,The einstein telescope: a third-generation gravitational wave observatory,Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 194002

    2010

  70. [81]

    Maggiore et al.,Science Case for the Einstein Telescope,JCAP03(2020) 050 [1912.02622]

    M. Maggiore et al.,Science Case for the Einstein Telescope,JCAP03(2020) 050 [1912.02622]. – 35 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  71. [82]

    Shaw and A

    J.R. Shaw and A. Lewis,Massive neutrinos and magnetic fields in the early universe,Physical Review D81(2010) 043517 [0911.2714]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  72. [83]

    Bonvin and C

    C. Bonvin and C. Caprini,CMB temperature anisotropy at large scales induced by a causal primordial magnetic field,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2010(2010) 022 [1004.1405]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  73. [84]

    Kohri and T

    K. Kohri and T. Terada,Semianalytic calculation of gravitational wave spectrum nonlinearly induced from primordial curvature perturbations,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 123532 [1804.08577]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  74. [85]

    Tomberg,Unit conversions and collected numbers in cosmology,2110.12251

    E. Tomberg,Unit conversions and collected numbers in cosmology,2110.12251

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  75. [86]

    S. Saga, H. Tashiro and S. Yokoyama,Limits on primordial magnetic fields from primordial black hole abundance,JCAP05(2020) 039 [2002.01286]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  76. [87]

    Kosowsky, A

    A. Kosowsky, A. Mack and T. Kahniashvili,Gravitational radiation from cosmological turbulence,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 024030 [astro-ph/0111483]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  77. [88]

    Baumann, P.J

    D. Baumann, P.J. Steinhardt, K. Takahashi and K. Ichiki,Gravitational Wave Spectrum Induced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 084019 [hep-th/0703290]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  78. [89]

    Maggiore,Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology,Phys

    M. Maggiore,Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology,Phys. Rept.331 (2000) 283 [gr-qc/9909001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  79. [90]

    Banerjee and K

    R. Banerjee and K. Jedamzik,The Evolution of cosmic magnetic fields: From the very early universe, to recombination, to the present,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 123003 [astro-ph/0410032]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  80. [91]

    Subramanian,The origin, evolution and signatures of primordial magnetic fields,Rept

    K. Subramanian,The origin, evolution and signatures of primordial magnetic fields,Rept. Prog. Phys.79(2016) 076901 [1504.02311]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

Showing first 80 references.