Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 50 references

Conductivity of the Landau levels of two-dimensional Dirac cones and gapped nodal-rings in the quantum limit under impurity-potentials

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In the ultraquantum limit, a gapped nodal-ring's effective lowest Landau level migrates with magnetic field, imprinted as resonant peaks in the longitudinal conductivity and zero-crossing sawteeth in the Hall conductivity.

desk verdict Gapped nodal rings get a new, coherent ultraquantum-limit transport fingerprint, but the predicted peak/zero-crossing positions rest on μ being pinned to the LLL; review should focus there. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.18769 v1 pith:75HB3STT submitted 2026-07-21 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.dis-nnhep-th

Ipsita Mandal , Sanskar Sharma This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.dis-nnhep-th PACS 73.43.-f72.10.-d71.70.Di
keywords Landaulevelsultraquantumlimitgappednodal-ringDiracconemagnetoconductivityimpurityscatteringHalleffectself-consistentBornapproximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that two two-dimensional systems with inequivalent Landau-level spectra are sharply distinguishable in the ultraquantum limit, the regime where only the lowest Landau level is occupied. For a 2D Dirac cone, the longitudinal conductivity is a smooth, monotonic function of field and the Hall conductivity is exactly zero. For a gapped nodal-ring, the non-monotonic 'stretched-checkmark' Landau-level spectrum makes the effective lowest Landau level migrate to successively lower indices as the field rises; this migration imprints a comb of resonant peaks on the longitudinal conductivity and a sign-alternating sawtooth on the Hall conductivity. The calculation, based on a disorder-averaged Green's-function formula with self-consistent Born self-energies, shows the oscillatory structure is independent of the impurity model while disorder sets only its envelope. A sympathetic reader would care because the predicted pattern is a concrete diagnostic for identifying nodal-ring materials in high magnetic fields.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the dimensionless ratio ρ = 2ε_r/ε_c, which positions the minimum of the GNR's stretched-checkmark Landau-level spectrum. The level index nearest the chemical potential is n_g = nint[(ρ−1)/2]; as B grows, ρ falls and n_g steps down through integers, and at each ρ = 2N the LLL is doubly degenerate. The calculation is carried by a disorder-averaged Green's-function expression for the dc conductivity in the Landau-level-overlap approximation, with a self-consistent Born self-energy for the LLL and non-self-consistent self-energies for its neighbours, together with the selection rule that only neighbouring indices (|n−n′| = 1) couple through the velocity operators.

What would settle it

Measure the dc magnetoconductivity of a candidate gapped nodal-ring material in the ultraquantum limit with μ tuned near the LLL. If σxx(B) does not show resonant peaks at the field values ρ=2N, or σxy(B) does not cross zero at those same fields, the central claim fails. Conversely, observation of a nonzero quantized Hall conductivity in a clean 2D Dirac cone would contradict the predicted vanishing σxy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in the ultraquantum limit a gapped nodal-ring's dc conductivity is governed by the field-driven migration of its effective lowest Landau level, whose index is n_g = nint[(ρ−1)/2] with ρ = 2ε_r/ε_c. Every time ρ passes through an even integer 2N, the LLL is momentarily degenerate with a neighbouring level: σxx develops a resonance peak and σxy crosses zero, flipping the sign of its sawtooth teeth. The Dirac cone, whose LLL sits at n=0 with particle-hole symmetric neighbours, instead gives a smooth monotonic σxx and an identically vanishing σxy. These results hold across pointlike, Gaussian, and Yukawa impurities, with disorder affecting only the amplitude and envelop

Load-bearing premise

The computation assumes the chemical potential is pinned near the LLL energy for every field (μ ≃ E_g); if μ instead follows a fixed carrier density, the LLL migration and the field positions of the resonances and zero-crossings could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At fields where ρ = 2N, σxx of a gapped nodal-ring shows resonant maxima that scale roughly as 1/(Γ_ng Γ_ngn); stronger disorder lowers and broadens them without moving them.
  • σxy shows a sawtooth with zero-crossings at exactly the same ρ = 2N fields, providing a sign-based counterpart to the longitudinal resonances.
  • For a Dirac cone, σxy is exactly zero for all disorder models, so a nonzero Hall response in the quantum limit singles out the nodal-ring case.
  • The peak and zero-crossing positions depend only on the band parameters via ρ, not on impurity type or density, making them a clean check against experiment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the chemical potential is set by a fixed carrier density rather than the assumed μ ≃ E_g pinning, the migration of n_g would be modified; the predicted peak and zero-crossing positions could shift, so the fingerprint is best sought in systems where μ can be tuned.
  • The same spectral resonances should show up in thermoelectric and Nernst coefficients, which the paper does not compute; measuring those would test the mechanism independently.
  • Introducing tilt or anisotropy in the nodal-ring Hamiltonian would modify velocity matrix elements and could distort the sawtooth; tracking how the zero-crossings move could help identify a specific material realization.
  • The 2D calculation suggests that a 3D nodal-ring semimetal, with toroidal Fermi surfaces, could show an analogous but more complex oscillatory transport once Landau quantisation of the ring plane is included.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper computes the dc magnetoconductivity of two-dimensional Dirac cones and gapped nodal-rings (GNRs) in the ultraquantum limit, using the Kubo–Bastin formalism with self-consistent Born self-energies for pointlike, Gaussian, and Yukawa impurity potentials. For the Dirac cone, the authors recover smooth, disorder-dependent longitudinal conductivity and show that the Hall conductivity vanishes identically by particle-hole symmetry. For the GNR, the non-monotonic 'stretched-checkmark' Landau-level spectrum causes the effective lowest Landau level (LLL) to migrate to lower indices as the magnetic field increases. This migration produces resonant peaks in the longitudinal conductivity and a sawtooth Hall conductivity with zero-crossings at the special field values ρ=2N, for all three disorder models. The paper also develops a 'vv selection rule' that restricts the contributing LL pairs and provides a classification of the ultraquantum-limit transport in different parameter regimes.

Significance. If the central claims are correct, the paper offers a clear, experimentally relevant transport fingerprint distinguishing a 2D Dirac cone from a gapped nodal-ring in the extreme quantum limit. The derivation is largely analytic and self-contained, with explicit velocity matrix elements, a transparent selection-rule analysis, and a full treatment of three disorder models. The Hall zero-crossing mechanism is elegant and appears robust: at ρ=2N the two degenerate neighboring levels give cancelling contributions independent of the detailed position of the chemical potential. The paper also supplies a useful explicit derivation of the vanishing Dirac Hall conductivity. However, the quantitative predictions for the longitudinal resonance positions depend on the assumption μ≃E_g, and the formal classification for regimes involving negative-energy LLs contains an internal inconsistency with the stated disorder model. These issues do not destroy the central qualitative picture for the plotted parameter range, but they require correction or clarification before the claims can be fully accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV.B.1, Eqs. (69) and (72)] The self-energy equations for the s=− branches are inconsistent with the scalar-disorder assumption stated in Sec. III.B.1. There the authors correctly note that a scalar potential V(r)∝I₂ does not mix the s=+ and s=− sectors. Yet Eq. (69) computes Σ_{n_g,−} from M_{n_g,−;n_g,+}, which is identically zero for scalar disorder, and Eq. (72) similarly uses M_{n1,−;n1,+} and M_{n1+1,−;n1,+}. The self-energy of an s=− state should be built from the diagonal s=− channel, whose Green's function at μ≈E_g is not resonant (the energy denominator is ≈2E_g). Consequently the s=− contributions retained in Eq. (73) and the corresponding conductivities in the 2E_g<min{Δ±} regimes are not correctly evaluated. Since the paper claims a complete classification of all possible cases, this is a load-bearing gap, not a mere typo.
  2. [Sec. III.B, Eq. (24), and Sec. V.A] The central assumption that μ is pinned to the LLL energy E_g(B) for every field is asserted but not justified against the experimentally natural fixed-density condition. With fixed carrier density n, the LLL filling ν=nh/(eB) decreases as B increases, so μ(B) moves within the broadened LLL and does not generally track E_g(B). The longitudinal resonances in σ_xx occur where μ=E_n; under a fixed-density preparation this condition is not equivalent to E_n=E_g, so the predicted peak locations at ρ=2N can shift substantially. The Hall zero-crossings at ρ=2N appear to survive because the two degenerate neighbors cancel by sgn(n−n_0) regardless of the precise value of μ, but the longitudinal fingerprint is sensitive. The authors should either justify the μ≃E_g limit (e.g., half-filled LLL, gate-tuned μ) or provide a companion fixed-density calculation demonstrating that the peak positions rema
  3. [Sec. III.B, Eq. (25)] The neighbor self-energy Σ_{n_gn}(μ) is non-self-consistent and is approximated by the single LLL-scattering term. The authors correctly state this is an approximation, but the resulting error is not quantified. Since the longitudinal peak heights scale as 1/(Γ_{n_g}Γ_{n_gn}) and the Hall tooth amplitudes also depend on Γ, an O(1) error in Γ_{n_gn} directly changes the predicted amplitudes, though not the resonance positions. I would like to see an estimate of the neglected terms, for example by retaining the next term in the n' sum in Eq. (23) for a representative parameter set, or a bound showing that the omitted contribution is suppressed by a small parameter such as Γ/E_g or Γ/Δ±.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. I] Typo: 'the associated linear response get modified i the presence' should read '...is modified in the presence'.
  2. [Eq. (19)] There is an extra comma in the definition of A_n(μ): '...,B_n(μ)' should be '..., B_n(μ)'.
  3. [Sec. III.B] Typo: 'evaluate the self energy if the LLL' should be '...of the LLL'.
  4. [Eq. (B10)] The displayed formula for the Yukawa case contains garbled typesetting ('1vuuut'); the equation should be reformatted.
  5. [Sec. IV.B.4] The classification assumes n₁≥1, but the case n₁=0 (i.e., ρ=2, where the LLL index reaches zero) is not explicitly covered. Since ρ decreases with increasing B, the high-field end of the plots may enter this edge regime; the authors should state how the selection rules and self-energies behave there.
  6. [Sec. VI] The authors appropriately list limitations of the single-band non-interacting picture and the neglect of tilt/anisotropy and electron-electron interactions. These are useful and should be retained; they do not affect the internal validity of the presented calculation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the GNR magnetoconductivity fingerprints are derived from the stated LL spectrum and a standard Kubo–Bastin/SCBA transport chain, with no fitted parameter or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The GNR Landau levels in Eq. (9) follow directly from the Hamiltonian in Eq. (2) by Landau quantization; the selection rules follow from the velocity matrix elements in Eqs. (57)–(62); and the conductivity is computed from the Kubo–Bastin formula, Eq. (16), with the SCBA self-energies in Eqs. (24)–(25). The oscillatory structure is a computed consequence, not an input: σxx peaks at ρ=2N because the spectral function A_n(μ)=2Γ_n/[(μ−E_n)^2+Γ_n^2] resonates when a neighboring LL becomes degenerate with the LLL under the stated μ≃E_g condition, and σxy zero-crossings follow from Eq. (66) through the combination of the dispersive kernel B_{n,s}(μ) and sgn(n−n0). No parameter is fitted to the target output; the only governing assumption, μ≃E_g, is an explicitly stated state-preparation condition, not a quantity constructed from the results it is used to explain. Ref. [14] supplies the external GNR model/LL context, and Ref. [12] is an external benchmark whose self-energy is explicitly corrected rather than adopted. The authors' self-citations (Refs. 16–23, 28–29, 40) are contextual and non-load-bearing. The possible fragility under fixed carrier density is a limitation of the assumed preparation condition, not a circularity in the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central computation depends on the chosen Hamiltonian and disorder parameters and on the SCBA truncation scheme; none of the constants are fitted to a target output, so there is no data-fitting circularity, but the quantitative curves (peak heights, envelope shapes) are contingent on these choices.

free parameters (6)
  • m* = 1.0 (figures)
    Band mass; sets cyclotron energy scale; chosen by hand in Figs. 3-8.
  • ε_r = 3.0
    Ring energy scale; controls when the LLL index migrates; chosen by hand.
  • Δ = 0.9
    Gap at the ring; sets LL energies and E_g; chosen by hand.
  • n_imp = 0.1, 0.2, 0.5
    Impurity density; sets Γ scales; varied to show 1/n_imp scaling.
  • d = 0.3, 0.8
    Range/screening length for Gaussian/Yukawa potentials; varied to show envelope reshaping.
  • V_0 = 1 (implicit)
    Impurity strength; enters Γ via γ = n_imp V_0^2/(8π v_F^2); not explicitly varied.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Kubo linear response and Kubo-Bastin formula (Eqs. 16, 18)
    Starting point for conductivity; standard many-body result.
  • domain assumption SCBA with neglect of ladder vertex corrections
    Stated in Sec. III.A; justified for weak short-range disorder but approximate for long-range potentials.
  • domain assumption Ultraquantum-limit truncation: only LLL and its nearest neighbor participate; μ=E_g
    Assumed in Sec. II.C/III.B; valid if LL spacing exceeds broadening and μ pins to LLL.
  • ad hoc to paper Non-self-consistent treatment of neighbor self-energy (Eq. 25)
    The neighbor's broadening is approximated as scattering into the LLL, not solved self-consistently; paper's specific shortcut.
  • domain assumption GNR Hamiltonian (Eq. 2) with persistent gap Δ at finite B
    Taken from Ref [14]; single-band two-level model.
  • domain assumption Single-band, non-interacting, untilted, isotropic description
    Stated in Sec. VI; extensions to tilt/interactions are deferred.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Conductivity of the Landau levels of two-dimensional Dirac cones and gapped nodal-rings in the quantum limit under impurity-potentials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/75HB3STT

@misc{pith2026260718769,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Conductivity of the Landau levels of two-dimensional Dirac cones and gapped nodal-rings in the quantum limit under impurity-potentials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/75HB3STT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.18769}
}
abstract

We investigate the dc magnetoconductivity of two-dimensional Dirac cones and gapped nodal rings (GNRs) subjected to a perpendicular magnetic field, which quantises the electronic spectrum into Landau levels (LLs). Working in the ultraquantum limit, where only the lowest LL (LLL) is partially occupied, we employ the Kubo--Bastin formalism to compute the transport coefficients for pointlike, Gaussian, and Yukawa impurity-potentials. For the Dirac case, the longitudinal conductivity is field-independent for pointlike impurities and a monotonic function of $B$ for the Gaussian and Yukawa potentials, while the Hall conductivity vanishes identically owing to the particle-hole symmetry of the two neighbouring LLs. The GNR case is qualitatively different: its non-monotonic stretched-checkmark LL spectrum causes the effective LLL to migrate to successively lower indices as the field increases, producing a pronounced oscillatory structure in both conductivities. The longitudinal response develops resonant peaks at LLL degeneracies, while the Hall conductivity traces out a sawtooth pattern with sharp zero-crossings at these same points. These results establish distinct transport fingerprints for the two systems in the extreme quantum limit, and provide a theoretical framework for interpreting magnetotransport experiments on GNRs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18769 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. LLs of GNR as functions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Schematics illustrating the selection rules of Secs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. , the tallest peak drops from σ ql xx ≈ 3.9 at nimp = 0.1 to ≈ 2.0 at nimp = 0.2 and ≈ 0.8 at nimp = 0.5, demonstrating explicitly that stronger disorder broadens the resonance and suppresses its peak value, even though it does not change where the peaks occur. (II) Second, the resonance prefactor in Eq. (63) carries a factor B2 max(n0, n). Taken alone, the explicit B2 term would make the peaks grow rapidly with B. … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. GNR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. GNR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. GNR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. GNR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. GNR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [12]

    N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015001 (2018)

    2018

  2. [14]

    Mandal, Chiral anomaly and internode scatterings in multifold semimetals, Phys

    I. Mandal, Chiral anomaly and internode scatterings in multifold semimetals, Phys. Rev. B111, 165116 (2025)

    2025

  3. [1]

    Ifρis non-integer, there is no degeneracy of any LL. 5 FIG. 1. LLs of GNR as functions ofρ, settingm ∗ = 1.0,ε r = 3.0, and ∆ = 0.9

  4. [2]

    For this case, (2n+ 1−ρ) 2/4 = (n−N) 2, leading to (N+N ′ −N) 2 = (N−N ′ −N) 2 — this impliesE ng+N ′ =E ng−N ′

    Ifρ= 2N+ 1 (odd integer) withN∈0∪Z +, then min(f) = 0,n g =N, andE g = ∆. For this case, (2n+ 1−ρ) 2/4 = (n−N) 2, leading to (N+N ′ −N) 2 = (N−N ′ −N) 2 — this impliesE ng+N ′ =E ng−N ′. Therefore, as long as ng −N ′ ≥0, we have doubly-degenerate LLs flanking the two sides of the LLL. One can easily observe this characteristic in Fig. 1. Forn g −N ′ <0 (o...

  5. [3]

    This gives a doubly-degenerate LLL where 2 LLs overlap with indicesn 1 =N−1 and n2 =N=n 1 + 1

    Ifρ= 2N(even integer) withN∈0∪Z +, thenn=N−1 andn=Ngive same energy because [2 (N−1) + 1−ρ] 2 = [2N+ 1−ρ] 2 = 1. This gives a doubly-degenerate LLL where 2 LLs overlap with indicesn 1 =N−1 and n2 =N=n 1 + 1. For this case, (2n+ 1−ρ) 2 = [2 (n−N) + 1] 2, leading to [2 (N+N ′ −1−N) + 1] 2 = [2 (N−N ′ −N) + 1] 2 = (2N ′ −1) 2 — this impliesE n1+N ′ =E n2−N ′...

  6. [4]

    (16) applies universally to both short-ranged and long-ranged disorder

    Short-ranged versus long-ranged impurities The conductivity formula Eq. (16) applies universally to both short-ranged and long-ranged disorder. However, the physical consequences of disorder type enter through the matrix elements that feed into the disorder-averaged Green’s functions. The selection of which LLs participate in transport (discussed in Sec. ...

  7. [5]

    The terminology originates from the fact that the impurity-correlator in the momentum space is constant, being equal toV 2 0

    Pointlike impurities Let us take the simplest case of pointlike impurities, such that the total perturbing potential is created by V(r−r i) =V 0 δ(r−r i),leading tou(q) =V 0 .(27) This model for short-ranged scatterers is referred to as white-noise disorder. The terminology originates from the fact that the impurity-correlator in the momentum space is con...

  8. [6]

    Long-ranged impurity potentials: Gaussian We now turn to the case where the impurity scattering potential extends over length scales that are comparable to or larger than the magnetic length. This situation arises naturally in systems where charged impurities are screened by a finite Debye length, or where the disorder originates from smooth potential var...

Show all 50 references
  1. [7]

    This potential arises when charged impurities are screened by a Debye lengthd −1 in the host material

    Long-ranged impurity potentials: Yukawa We now consider the case of a screened Coulomb interaction, modelled by a Yukawa potential. This potential arises when charged impurities are screened by a Debye lengthd −1 in the host material. We model this through a Yukawa potential o...

  2. [8]

    Short-ranged potential For pointlike impurities (viz. Fig. 3), Γng ≃ q nimp V 2 0 2π ℓ2 B ∝ p nimp B, obtained by solving the self-consistent Eq. (24) for the LLL and found to be independent of the value ofn g itself. Thisn g-independence follows directly from the momentum- in...

  3. [9]

    Long-ranged potentials The Gaussian and Yukawa panels (viz. Figs. 4 and 5, respectively) look qualitatively different from the pointlike case for a simple reason: for a long-ranged potential, the matrix elements retain an explicit dependence on the Landau-level 19 FIG. 4. GNR:...

  4. [10]

    Comparison across disorder types Taken together, the three impurity models illustrate a single unifying idea: the ultraquantum-limit conductivity is controlled almost entirely by how sharply the disorder-induced self-energies Γ ng and Γngn resonate at each level crossing, sinc...

  5. [11]

    A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 109 (2009)

    2009

  6. [13]

    D. T. Son and B. Z. Spivak, Chiral anomaly and classical negative magnetoresistance of Weyl metals, Phys. Rev. B88, 104412 (2013)

    2013

  7. [15]

    K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure constant based on quantized Hall resistance, Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 494 (1980)

    1980

  8. [16]

    D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard, Two-dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1559 (1982)

    1982

  9. [17]

    S. M. Girvin and T. Jach, Formalism for the quantum Hall effect: Hilbert space of analytic functions, Phys. Rev. B29, 5617 (1984)

    1984

  10. [18]

    J. N. Fuchs, F. Pi´ echon, M. O. Goerbig, and G. Montambaux, Topological Berry phase and semiclassical quantization of cyclotron orbits for two dimensional electrons in coupled band models, Eur. Phys. J. Plus77, 351 (2010)

    2010

  11. [19]

    N. H. Shon and T. Ando, Quantum transport in two-dimensional graphite system, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.67, 2421 (1998)

    1998

  12. [20]

    Gusynin, S

    V. Gusynin, S. Sharapov, and J. Carbotte, Magneto-optical conductivity in graphene, Journal of Phys.: Condensed Matter19, 026222 (2006)

    2006

  13. [21]

    M. O. Goerbig, Electronic properties of graphene in a strong magnetic field, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1193 (2011)

    2011

  14. [22]

    Qiang, H.-Y

    X.-B. Qiang, H.-Y. Xu, R.-J. Tong, S. Li, Z.-X. Gao, P.-L. Zhao, and H.-Z. Lu, Linear magnetoresistance of two-dimensional massless Dirac fermions in the quantum limit, Phys. Rev. B112, 224208 (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    A. A. Abrikosov, Quantum magnetoresistance, Phys. Rev. B58, 2788 (1998)

    1998

  16. [24]

    Barati, H

    S. Barati, H. Rahimpoor, and S. H. Abedinpour, Quantum Hall effect and optical magnetoconductivity of two-dimensional topological nodal-line semimetals, Phys. Rev. B111, 075125 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    N. Xin, J. Lourembam, P. Kumaravadivel, A. Kazantsev, Z. Wu, C. Mullan, J. Barrier, A. A. Geim, I. Grigorieva, A. Mishchenko, et al., Giant magnetoresistance of Dirac plasma in high-mobility graphene, Nature616, 270 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Mandal, Linear response of tilted anisotropic two-dimensional Dirac cones, Eur

    I. Mandal, Linear response of tilted anisotropic two-dimensional Dirac cones, Eur. Phys. J. B98, 123 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    Sharma and I

    S. Sharma and I. Mandal, Linear response from tilted Dirac cones under strain-induced pseudomagnetic fields, arXiv e-prints 10.48550/arXiv.2604.25758 (2026), arXiv:2604.25758 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2026 doi arXiv

  20. [28]

    Mandal and K

    I. Mandal and K. Saha, Thermopower in an anisotropic two-dimensional Weyl semimetal, Phys. Rev. B101, 045101 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    Mandal and K

    I. Mandal and K. Saha, Thermoelectric response in nodal-point semimetals, Ann. Phys. (Berlin)536, 2400016 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Yadav, S

    S. Yadav, S. Sekh, and I. Mandal, Magneto-optical conductivity in the type-I and type-II phases of Weyl/multi-Weyl semimetals, Physica B: Condensed Matter656, 414765 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Mandal, Signatures of two- and three-dimensional semimetals from circular dichroism, International Journal of Modern Physics B38, 2450216 (2024)

    I. Mandal, Signatures of two- and three-dimensional semimetals from circular dichroism, International Journal of Modern Physics B38, 2450216 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Medel, R

    L. Medel, R. Ghosh, A. Mart ´ ın-Ruiz, and I. Mandal, Electric, thermal, and thermoelectric magnetoconductivity for Weyl/multi- Weyl semimetals in planar Hall set-ups induced by the combined effects of topology and strain, Scientific Reports14, 21390 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Mandal, Anisotropic conductivity for the type-I and type-II phases of Weyl/multi-Weyl semimetals in planar Hall set-ups, Annals of Physics482, 170181 (2025)

    I. Mandal, Anisotropic conductivity for the type-I and type-II phases of Weyl/multi-Weyl semimetals in planar Hall set-ups, Annals of Physics482, 170181 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    J.-L. Lu, W. Luo, X.-Y. Li, S.-Q. Yang, J.-X. Cao, X.-G. Gong, and H.-J. Xiang, Two-dimensional node-line semimetals in a honeycomb-Kagome lattice, Chin. Phys. Lett.34, 057302 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    B. Yang, X. Zhang, and M. Zhao, Dirac node lines in two-dimensional Lieb lattices, Nanoscale9, 8740 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Y. Jin, R. Wang, J. Zhao, Y. Du, C. Zheng, L. Gan, J. Liu, H. Xu, and S. Y. Tong, The prediction of a family group of two-dimensional node-line semimetals, Nanoscale9, 13112 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    W. L. Min-Xue Yang and W. Chen, Quantum transport in topological nodal-line semimetals, Advances in Physics: X7, 2065216 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    Hussain Rather, M

    F. Hussain Rather, M. Jaffar A., and I. Mandal, Direction-dependent linear response for gapped nodal-line semimetals in planar-Hall configurations, Eur. Phys. J. B99, 41 (2026)

    2026

  31. [39]

    Haidar, M

    F. Haidar, M. Jaffar A., and I. Mandal, Interplay of strain-induced axial gauge fields and intrinsic band-topology in the magnetoelectric conductivity of gapped nodal rings, arXiv e-prints (2026), arXiv:2604.12275 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2026 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Kubo, Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes

    R. Kubo, Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. i. general theory and simple applications to magnetic and conduction problems, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan12, 570 (1957). 28

    1957

  33. [41]

    Bruus and K

    H. Bruus and K. Flensberg,Many-Body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    D. A. Greenwood, The Boltzmann equation in the theory of electrical conduction in metals, Proceedings of the Physical Society 71, 585 (1958)

    1958

  35. [43]

    N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin,Solid State Physics, reprint ed. (Cengage Learning, 2011) original publication: 1976, Holt, Rinehart and Winston

    2011

  36. [44]

    Bastin, C

    A. Bastin, C. Lewiner, O. Betbeder-Matibet, and P. Nozi` eres, Quantum oscillations of the Hall effect of a fermion gas with random impurity scattering, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids32, 1811 (1971)

    1971

  37. [45]

    Morpurgo, C

    G. Morpurgo, C. Berthod, and T. Giamarchi, Universal low-density power laws of the dc conductivity and Hall constant in the self-consistent Born approximation, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033038 (2025)

    2025

  38. [46]

    G. D. Mahan,Many-Particle Physics, 3rd ed. (Springer, New York, 2000)

    2000

  39. [47]

    Chen and W

    W. Chen and W. Zhu, Viscosity of disordered Dirac electrons, Phys. Rev. B106, 014205 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    M. G. Vavilov and I. L. Aleiner, Magnetotransport in a two-dimensional electron gas at large filling factors, Phys. Rev. B69, 035303 (2004)

    2004

  41. [49]

    Pongsangangan, Kinetic equation from Landau level basis: Beyond relaxation-time approximation, arXiv e-prints (2025), arXiv:2509.06019 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    K. Pongsangangan, Kinetic equation from Landau level basis: Beyond relaxation-time approximation, arXiv e-prints (2025), arXiv:2509.06019 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Mandal, Unconventional magnetoelectric conductivity and electrochemical response from dipole-like sources of Berry curva- ture, arXiv:2602.08844 [cond-mat.mes-hall] (2026)

    I. Mandal, Unconventional magnetoelectric conductivity and electrochemical response from dipole-like sources of Berry curva- ture, arXiv:2602.08844 [cond-mat.mes-hall] (2026)

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.