Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 89 references

A microlensed compact-binary coalescence can be found with a product template bank—the usual unlensed bank times a ~4,000-template lensing bank—restoring 0.97 fitting factor and cutting mismatch tenfold.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 09:41 UTC pith:THI5F6V2

load-bearing objection A genuinely useful prescription for a microlensed-CBC template bank, with a real but fixable weakness in the block-diagonal assumption. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.20661 v1 pith:THI5F6V2 submitted 2026-07-22 gr-qc astro-ph.HEastro-ph.IM

A product template bank to search for compact binary coalescences microlensed by isolated point mass lenses

Sudhir Gholap , Sanjeev V. Dhurandhar , Shasvath J. Kapadia This is my paper
classification gr-qc astro-ph.HEastro-ph.IM MSC 83C35 PACS 04.30.-w95.85.Sz
keywords gravitational wavesmicrolensingtemplate bankmatched filteringgeometric opticspoint mass lenscompact binary coalescencephase metric
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Standard matched-filter searches for compact-binary coalescences lose up to 30% of the signal-to-noise ratio when a point-mass lens with Schwarzschild radius comparable to the gravitational-wave wavelength sits in front of the source. This matters because such microlensed signals could reveal isolated intermediate-mass black holes and constrain dark matter. The paper tries to close the gap by constructing a lensing template bank—roughly 4,000 templates in image time-delay and relative-magnification—that can be tacked onto any ordinary CBC bank. The key claim is that the full template metric is nearly block-diagonal, so the microlensed bank is a Cartesian product of the unlensed bank and a lensing bank built from the geometric-optics phase alone. Using that phase to lay out templates, the authors report fitting factors of at least 0.97 across the selected lensing region, a mismatch reduction of up to a factor of ten, and recovery of about 91% of the sensitive volume compared with about 35% without the lensing bank, while noting that the geometric-optics bank misses part of the wave-optics region for light systems.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the matched-filter phase metric for a point-mass-microlensed CBC splits into two nearly independent blocks: the binary parameters and the lensing parameters (image time delay t_d and relative magnification mu_r). Because the off-diagonal cross terms are negligible, the template bank for microlensed signals is, to very good approximation, the Cartesian product of an existing unlensed CBC bank and a separately built lensing bank. The lensing bank is laid out using the analytic phase of the geometric-optics amplification factor, whose derivatives define a phase metric; demanding a minimal match of 0.97 gives roughly 4,000 templates over t_d in 1–500 ms and mu_r in

What carries the argument

The central object is the geometric-optics lensing phase Phi_L(f; t_d, mu_r) = arctan[-cos(2*pi*f*t_d)/(mu_r + sin(2*pi*f*t_d))]. The phase metric derived from it—the covariance of its frequency-weighted derivatives—determines template spacing, with the off-diagonal t_d–mu_r term negligible and the diagonal lensing metric roughly constant for t_d >= 20 ms. The structural load-bearer is the block-diagonal approximation of the full metric, Eq. (20), which lets the lensing bank be built once and appended to any CBC bank; the paper supports this with a three-parameter Newtonian-chirp test showing less than 0.1% difference in proper volume.

Load-bearing premise

The construction collapses if the lens and binary parameters do interact in the matched-filter metric: the paper assumes the cross-terms are negligible and supports that with a single three-parameter Newtonian-chirp test, leaving spinning, eccentric, or higher-harmonic waveforms untested.

What would settle it

Compute the full phase metric, including the off-diagonal blocks between CBC and lens parameters, for a waveform family with spins or eccentricity over the same frequency band; if the off-diagonal blocks change the required template count by more than a percent or two, the product-bank claim is falsified. Independently, inject a wave-optics-microlensed signal with total mass near 11 solar masses and a small impact parameter and check whether the geometric-optics product bank returns a fitting factor below 0.97, as the paper's own plots suggest.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • One fixed lensing bank can be added to any existing CBC template bank, including future banks with spins, eccentricity, or higher harmonics, because the lensing-phase derivation does not assume a specific unlensed waveform.
  • Within the selected lensing region, the search sensitive volume roughly triples, from about 35% to about 91%, compared with using only unlensed templates.
  • A hierarchical search becomes feasible: first match with the unlensed bank to localize the CBC parameters, then apply the lensing bank only to superthreshold candidates, avoiding a full product-space search.
  • Subthreshold CBC candidates can be screened for microlensing cheaply: if adding lensing templates pushes the candidate above threshold, it becomes a microlensing follow-up candidate; if not, it can be dismissed.
  • For future third-generation detectors with far more events, the product bank provides a computationally tractable path to routine microlensing searches.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: If the block-diagonal approximation holds only for non-spinning, circular, dominant-mode waveforms, then realistic banks may need lensing templates placed separately for each binary; a natural next test is computing the full metric for spinning or eccentric waveform families and checking proper-volume changes.
  • Inference: The geometric-optics bank deliberately leaves the small-y, low-total-mass wave-optics corner under-covered; as detector sensitivity grows, that corner could become more important, motivating a hybrid bank that adds a few full wave-optics templates.
  • Inference: The same product-bank logic could apply to any multiplicative, frequency-dependent distortion of the waveform with a separable phase, suggesting analogous banks for propagation effects such as dark-matter substructure, not just point-mass lenses.
  • Inference: A direct end-to-end injection study in real detector data, measuring detection efficiency and false-alarm rates with and without the lensing bank, would test whether the 0.97 fitting-factor guarantee survives realistic noise, vetoes, and template-bank edge effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a prescription for constructing a product template bank to search for gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences (CBCs) microlensed by isolated point-mass lenses. The central idea is to approximate the full search parameter space as a Cartesian product of the standard unlensed CBC bank and a lensing bank in the two-dimensional space of time delay t_d and relative magnification mu_r, built from the geometric-optics phase of the point-mass lens amplification factor. The lensing region of interest is identified where the unlensed bank yields fitting factor below 0.97, and roughly 4000 lensing templates are placed using a phase metric. The paper validates the bank by computing fitting factors for full wave-optics microlensed injections with CBC total masses 11, 50, and 100 M_sun, reporting up to a factor of ~10 reduction in mismatch and consistency with the 0.97 minimal-match criterion, with an acknowledged residual low-FF region for light systems.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper provides a practical route to extend matched-filter searches to include microlensing without multiplying the template count by the full CBC parameter space: the lensing bank is constructed once and can be 'tacked on' to any existing CBC bank. The phase-metric derivation is standard, and validating the geometric-optics-based bank against independent full wave-optics injections is the right test. The approximate block-diagonal structure, if confirmed across realistic CBC parameter spaces, would be a useful simplification. However, the evidence for the block-diagonal assumption is presently thin, and the abstract-level FF>=0.97 claim is not fully supported by the paper's own residual low-FF region for Mtot=11 M_sun.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III, Eq. (20); §III.B] The Cartesian-product structure is the paper's central structural claim, but its only direct numerical support is a three-parameter Newtonian-chirp test showing <0.1% change in proper volume when off-diagonal metric elements are zeroed. This is not a convincing proxy for realistic CBC banks, which include at least two mass parameters, mass ratio, and spins. The cross-covariance between lensing and CBC phase derivatives is not computed for such parameters. Please provide either a direct calculation of the cross terms for a realistic waveform family (e.g., IMRPhenomD or TaylorF2 with varying mass ratio and spins) or a demonstration that the product bank maintains FF>=0.97 over the selected lensing region for a dense grid of CBC intrinsic parameters. Without this, the 'tack-on' claim is not established.
  2. [Abstract; §IV (Fig. 9)] The abstract and Sec. IV state consistency with the prescribed minimal match criterion of 0.97, but Sec. IV explicitly acknowledges an 'additional region of low fitting factor' for Mtot=11 M_sun that is 'not captured by the geometric-optics approximation.' Thus the bank does not meet the stated FF>=0.97 criterion over the entire selected domain. Please quantify this region (location in MLz and y, achieved FF values, fraction of the lensing parameter space) and either restrict the abstract and conclusions to the sub-domain where the criterion is actually met, or modify the bank (e.g., densify templates or include correction terms) to satisfy the criterion over the full stated domain.
  3. [§III.A, Eq. (24)] The phase metric is derived after replacing the oscillating amplitude prefactor in Eq. (24) by its average, justified by the statement that matched filtering is mostly phase-sensitive. This is plausible but unquantified; it may contribute to the residual low-FF region for lighter systems. I recommend a direct check: for representative lens parameters, compare the FF predicted by the phase metric with the exact normalized complex overlap computed from Eq. (21) or from the full F_ML, and report the mismatch. This would also clarify how much of the residual low-FF region is due to the geometric-optics phase versus the amplitude-averaging step.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction, 2nd paragraph] 'Cartesean' should be 'Cartesian'; the misspelling also appears in a few other places (e.g., Sec. V).
  2. [Data Availability] The data availability statement says data are available from the authors upon reasonable request, but no repository is given for the bank-construction or FF-validation scripts. Making the code publicly available would substantially strengthen reproducibility of the template count and placement results.
  3. [§II.C, Eqs. (10)-(11)] The description of the averaging as 'signal power divided by the PSD' is a little loose, since the integrand is f^{-7/3}/S_h(f) with N defined separately; consider clarifying that the weight is unnormalized and N fixes the normalization.
  4. [Fig. 6] The vertical axis label 'y' appears to denote the geometrical impact parameter while the horizontal axis is t_d and mu_r; making the mapping between y and mu_r explicit in the caption would avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: lensing bank built from analytic geometric-optics phase and validated against independent wave-optics injections.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The lensing bank is constructed from the analytic geometric-optics phase Φ_L(f), with the phase metric (Eq. 28) and template placement (Eq. 31) derived from first principles; no parameter is fitted to the injected signals. The bank is then validated against signals generated with the full wave-optics amplification factor F_ML (Eq. 4), which is a different model from the geometric-optics F_GO (Eq. 5) used to build the bank. The FF≥0.97 result in the covered region is a consequence of metric-based placement, but the nontrivial claim—that geometric-optics templates recover full wave-optics signals—is tested directly, and the admitted Mtot=11 exception shows the test is genuine rather than guaranteed. The block-diagonal approximation (Eq. 20) is an extrapolation supported by a single Newtonian-chirp proper-volume test, so it is a robustness concern, but it is not a circular reduction: the paper does not define the lensing metrics in terms of the CBC metrics or fit cross-terms to achieve the desired product structure. Self-citations appear only in contextual lists of lensing-search pipelines and hierarchical-search strategies; they are not load-bearing, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation. Overall, the central derivation is self-contained and the validation is independent.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The free parameters are design choices (minimum match and domain boundaries). The main load-bearing assumptions are the adequacy of geometric-optics templates and the block-diagonal metric; both are partly validated but with acknowledged gaps.

free parameters (2)
  • Minimum match epsilon = 0.03
    Chosen by hand as the standard minimal-match criterion; not fitted to injections. It sets the template spacing dl = sqrt(2*epsilon).
  • Lensing bank domain boundaries = t_d in [1,500] ms; μ_r in (1,5.5]; M_Lz in [10^2,10^5] M_sun; y in [0.01,2]
    Selected from the FF<0.97 region in the authors' match study plus a practical cut at t_d=500 ms. This is a domain choice, not a waveform parameter fitted to data.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Point-mass lens, thin-lens and weak-field approximations; Fresnel-Kirchhoff diffraction integral (Eq. 1) and closed-form F_ML (Eq. 4) are valid.
    Standard lensing model; restricts validity to isolated point masses, not extended lenses or more complex mass distributions.
  • domain assumption Geometric-optics approximation (Eq. 5) is adequate for template construction across the selected lensing region.
    Used throughout Sec. III to build templates. The paper itself notes it fails to capture an additional low-FF region for Mtot=11 M_sun.
  • ad hoc to paper Matched filtering is sensitive mostly to phase, so the oscillating amplitude prefactor in Eq. (24) can be replaced by its average.
    Justified by appeal to phase sensitivity; underpins the phase metric derivation in Eq. (28). Not independently tested against amplitude-sensitive statistics.
  • ad hoc to paper The full parameter-space metric is block diagonal (Eq. 20); cross-terms between CBC and lensing parameters are negligible.
    Supported only by a Newtonian-chirp 3-parameter test with <0.1% volume difference; this is extrapolated to the full CBC parameter space without direct validation.
  • standard math Phase-metric formalism: match M ≈ 1 − g_ab ΔΛ^a ΔΛ^b with g_ab = 1/2(⟨Φ_a Φ_b⟩ − ⟨Φ_a⟩⟨Φ_b⟩) (Eq. 28).
    Standard phase-metric formalism from Owen and Sathyaprakash-Dhurandhar; derived in Appendix C.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 22531 in / 13079 out tokens · 101311 ms · 2026-08-01T09:41:37.575730+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Gravitational waves (GW) from stellar mass compact binary coalescences (CBCs) that encounter a lens whose Schwarzschild radius is comparable to the GW wavelength, will be microlensed, leading to frequency-dependent modulations in the observed signal. Neglecting such wave-optics effects in standard templated searches for CBCs can result in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) losses as large as 30%. Here, we present a prescription for constructing a template bank targeted at microlensed GWs. We consider CBCs microlensed by isolated point mass lenses, whose frequency-dependent amplification factor is known to have a closed-form analytical expression. However, to construct the template bank, it suffices to use the geometric optics approximation, effectively modeling the microlensed signal as overlapping signals. Moreover, given that matched filtering is mostly sensitive to the phase of the GW signal, we use the phase of the amplification factor to compute the metric elements. The usual CBC parameter space is appended by two extra parameters: (i) the time-delay ($t_d$) between images and (ii) the relative-magnification ($\mu_r$). By identifying the region of the lensing parameter space where the fitting factor (FF) falls below 97% due to wave-optics effects, we construct a template bank consisting of ~4000 templates covering the selected lensing region, independent of the values of the unlensed CBCs' parameters. We show that the bank targeting microlensed CBCs is, to a very good approximation, a Cartesian product of the unlensed CBC bank and the bank spanning the lensing parameters. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method by evaluating fitting factors using both the unlensed CBC bank and the product template bank, finding a reduction of up to a factor of ~10 in the mismatch, as well as consistency with the prescribed minimal match criterion of 0.97 used in the construction of the banks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20661 by Sanjeev V. Dhurandhar, Shasvath J. Kapadia, Sudhir Gholap.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Phase (top panel) and amplitude (middle panel) of the amplification factors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. A schematic for the frequency evolution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The variation of the average of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The metric elements [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. An illustration of the Mismatch Square. The green [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 18 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Advanced LIGO, Class

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Advanced LIGO, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), Advanced Virgo: a second- generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Class

    F. Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), Advanced Virgo: a second- generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), Overview of KAGRA: Detec- tor design and construction history, PTEP2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

    T. Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), Overview of KAGRA: Detec- tor design and construction history, PTEP2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    L. S. Collaboration, V. Collaboration, K. Collaboration, et al., Gwtc-5.0: Observations from the second part of the fourth ligo-virgo-kagra observing run and updates to the gravitational-wave transient catalog, arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.27225 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    Cannon, S

    K. Cannon, S. Caudill, C. Chan, B. Cousins, J. D. Creighton, B. Ewing, H. Fong, P. Godwin, C. Hanna, S. Hooper,et al., Gstlal: A software framework for grav- itational wave discovery, SoftwareX14, 100680 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    All´ en´ e, F

    C. All´ en´ e, F. Aubin, I. Bentara, D. Buskulic, G. M. Guidi, V. Juste, M. Lethuillier, F. Marion, L. Mobilia, B. Mours,et al., The mbta pipeline for detecting compact binary coalescences in the fourth ligo-virgo-kagra ob- serving run, Classical and Quantum Gravity42, 105009 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Dal Canton, A

    T. Dal Canton, A. H. Nitz, B. Gadre, G. S. Cabourn Davies, V. Villa-Ortega, T. Dent, I. Harry, and L. Xiao, Real-time search for compact binary mergers in advanced ligo and virgo’s third observing run using pycbc live, The Astrophysical Journal923, 254 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Q. Chu, M. Kovalam, L. Wen, T. Slaven-Blair, J. Bosveld, Y. Chen, P. Clearwater, A. Codoreanu, Z. Du, X. Guo,et al., Spiir online coherent pipeline to search for gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences, Physical Review D105, 024023 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    B. S. Sathyaprakash and S. V. Dhurandhar, Choice of filters for the detection of gravitational waves from coa- lescing binaries, Phys. Rev. D44, 3819 (1991)

    1991

  10. [10]

    S. V. Dhurandhar and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Choice of filters for the detection of gravitational waves from coa- lescing binaries. ii. detection in colored noise, Phys. Rev. D49, 1707 (1994)

    1994

  11. [11]

    B. J. Owen, Search templates for gravitational waves from inspiraling binaries: Choice of template spacing, Phys. Rev. D53, 6749 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9511032

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  12. [12]

    B. J. Owen and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Matched filtering of gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: Computational cost and template placement, Phys. Rev. D60, 022002 (1999)

    1999

  13. [13]

    T. Cokelaer, Gravitational waves from inspiralling com- pact binaries: hexagonal template placement and its ef- ficiency in detecting physical signals, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology76, 102004 (2007)

    2007

  14. [14]

    I. W. Harry, B. Allen, and B. Sathyaprakash, Stochas- tic template placement algorithm for gravitational wave data analysis, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology80, 104014 (2009)

    2009

  15. [15]

    S. Roy, A. S. Sengupta, and N. Thakor, Hybrid geometric-random template-placement algorithm for gravitational wave searches from compact binary coales- cences, Physical Review D95, 104045 (2017)

    2017

  16. [16]

    Dal Canton, A

    T. Dal Canton, A. P. Lundgren, and A. B. Nielsen, Im- pact of precession on aligned-spin searches for neutron- star–black-hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D91, 062010 (2015)

    2015

  17. [17]

    Calder´ on Bustillo, S

    J. Calder´ on Bustillo, S. Husa, A. M. Sintes, and M. P¨ urrer, Impact of gravitational radiation higher order modes on single aligned-spin gravitational wave searches for binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D93, 084019 (2016)

    2016

  18. [18]

    J. C. Bustillo, N. Sanchis-Gual, A. Torres-Forn´ e, and J. A. Font, Confusing head-on collisions with precessing intermediate-mass binary black hole mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 201101 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    Dietrich, S

    T. Dietrich, S. Khan, R. Dudi, S. J. Kapadia, P. Ku- mar, A. Nagar, F. Ohme, F. Pannarale, A. Samaj- dar, S. Bernuzzi, G. Carullo, W. Del Pozzo, M. Haney, C. Markakis, M. P¨ urrer, G. Riemenschneider, Y. E. Setyawati, K. W. Tsang, and C. Van Den Broeck, Mat- ter imprints in waveform models for neutron star bina- ries: Tidal and self-spin effects, Phys. Re...

    2019

  20. [20]

    Ramos-Buades, S

    A. Ramos-Buades, S. Tiwari, M. Haney, and S. Husa, Impact of eccentricity on the gravitational-wave searches for binary black holes: High mass case, Phys. Rev. D 102, 043005 (2020)

    2020

  21. [21]

    K. S. Phukon, P. Schmidt, and G. Pratten, Geomet- ric template bank for the detection of spinning low- mass compact binaries with moderate orbital eccentric- ity, Phys. Rev. D111, 043040 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    H. S. Chia, T. D. P. Edwards, D. Wadekar, A. Zimmer- man, S. Olsen, J. Roulet, T. Venumadhav, B. Zackay, and M. Zaldarriaga, In pursuit of love numbers: First templated search for compact objects with large tidal deformabilities in the ligo-virgo data, Phys. Rev. D110, 063007 (2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    A. K. Mehta, D. Wadekar, J. Roulet, I. Anantpurkar, T. Venumadhav, J. Mushkin, B. Zackay, M. Zaldarriaga, and T. Islam, Significant increase in sensitive volume of a gravitational wave search upon including higher har- monics, (2025), arXiv:2501.17939 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Schneider, J

    P. Schneider, J. Ehlers, and E. E. Falco,Gravitational Lenses(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992)

    1992

  25. [25]

    K. K. Y. Ng, K. W. K. Wong, T. Broadhurst, and T. G. F. Li, Precise ligo lensing rate predictions for binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D97, 023012 (2018)

    2018

  26. [26]

    S.-S. Li, S. Mao, Y. Zhao, and Y. Lu, Gravitational lensing of gravitational waves: A statistical perspective, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society476, 2220 (2018)

    2018

  27. [27]

    M. Oguri, Effect of gravitational lensing on the distri- bution of gravitational waves from distant binary black hole mergers, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society480, 3842 (2018)

    2018

  28. [28]

    G. P. Smith, M. Jauzac, J. Veitch, W. M. Farr, R. Massey, and J. Richard, What if ligo’s gravitational wave detections are strongly lensed by massive galaxy clusters?, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical So- ciety475, 3823 (2018)

    2018

  29. [29]

    R. J. Smith, G. Ashton, A. Vajpeyi, and C. Tal- bot, Massively parallel bayesian inference for transient gravitational-wave astronomy, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society498, 4492 (2020)

    2020

  30. [30]

    G. P. Smith, A. Robertson, M. Bianconi, and M. Jauzac 15 (LSST), Discovery of Strongly-lensed Gravitational Waves - Implications for the LSST Observing Strategy, (2019), arXiv:1902.05140 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    Robertson, G

    A. Robertson, G. P. Smith, R. Massey, V. Eke, M. Jauzac, M. Bianconi, and D. Ryczanowski, What does strong gravitational lensing? the mass and redshift dis- tribution of high-magnification lenses, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society495, 3727 (2020)

    2020

  32. [32]

    Ryczanowski, G

    D. Ryczanowski, G. P. Smith, M. Bianconi, R. Massey, A. Robertson, and M. Jauzac, On building a clus- ter watchlist for identifying strongly lensed supernovae, gravitational waves and kilonovae, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society495, 1666 (2020)

    2020

  33. [33]

    Dai and T

    L. Dai and T. Venumadhav, On the waveforms of gravitationally lensed gravitational waves, (2017), arXiv:1702.04724 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Gholap, K

    S. Gholap, K. Soni, S. J. Kapadia, and S. Dhurandhar,χ 2 statistic for the identification of strongly lensed gravita- tional waves from compact binary coalescences, Physical Review D112, 124074 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    Goyal, S

    S. Goyal, S. J. Kapadia, and P. Ajith, Rapid identification of strongly lensed gravitational-wave events with machine learning, Physical Review D104, 124057 (2021)

    2021

  36. [36]

    Goyal, S

    S. Goyal, S. J. Kapadia, J.-R. Cudell, A. K. Y. Li, and J. C. L. Chan, Rapid method for preliminary identifi- cation of subthreshold strongly lensed counterparts to superthreshold gravitational-wave events, Phys. Rev. D 109, 023028 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Haris, A

    K. Haris, A. K. Mehta, S. Kumar, T. Venumadhav, and P. Ajith, Identifying strongly lensed gravitational wave signals from binary black hole mergers, (2018), arXiv:1807.07062 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [38]

    Kopty, S

    A. Kopty, S. Mitra, and A. More, Optimal cross- correlation technique to search for strongly lensed gravi- tational waves, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.22138 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    Chakraborty and S

    A. Chakraborty and S. Mukherjee, Glance–gravitational lensing authenticator using non-modelled cross- correlation exploration of gravitational wave signals, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society532, 4842 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Janquart, O

    J. Janquart, O. A. Hannuksela, K. Haris, and C. Van den Broeck, GOLUM: A fast and precise methodology to search for, and analyze, strongly lensed gravitational- wave events, in56th Rencontres de Moriond on Gravi- tation(2022) arXiv:2203.06444 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Janquart, K

    J. Janquart, K. Haris, O. A. Hannuksela, and C. Van Den Broeck, The return of GOLUM: improving dis- tributed joint parameter estimation for strongly lensed gravitational waves, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.526, 3088 (2023), arXiv:2304.12148 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    R. K. L. Lo and I. Maga˜ na Hernandez, Bayesian statistical framework for identifying strongly lensed gravitational-wave signals, Phys. Rev. D107, 123015 (2023)

    2023

  43. [43]

    Barsode, S

    A. Barsode, S. Goyal, and P. Ajith, Fast and efficient bayesian method to search for strongly lensed gravita- tional waves, The Astrophysical Journal980, 258 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    J. M. Ezquiaga, W. Hu, and R. K. L. Lo, Identifying strongly lensed gravitational waves through their phase consistency, Phys. Rev. D108, 103520 (2023)

    2023

  45. [45]

    Campailla, M

    G. Campailla, M. Raveri, W. Hu, and J. M. Ezquiaga, Machine learning assisted parameter-space searches for lensed gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D113, 083510 (2026)

    2026

  46. [46]

    A. K. Y. Li, R. K. L. Lo, S. Sachdev, J. C. L. Chan, E. T. Lin, T. G. F. Li, and A. J. Weinstein, Targeted subthresh- old search for strongly lensed gravitational-wave events, Phys. Rev. D107, 123014 (2023)

    2023

  47. [47]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), Search for Lensing Signatures in the Gravitational-Wave Observa- tions from the First Half of LIGO–Virgo’s Third Observ- ing Run, Astrophys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), Search for Lensing Signatures in the Gravitational-Wave Observa- tions from the First Half of LIGO–Virgo’s Third Observ- ing Run, Astrophys. J.923, 14 (2021), arXiv:2105.06384 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, VIRGO), Search for Gravitational-lensing Signatures in the Full Third Observing Run of the LIGO–Virgo Network, As- trophys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, VIRGO), Search for Gravitational-lensing Signatures in the Full Third Observing Run of the LIGO–Virgo Network, As- trophys. J.970, 191 (2024), arXiv:2304.08393 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Searches for Gravitational-Wave Lensing Signatures, (2025), arXiv:2512.16347 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Takahashi and T

    R. Takahashi and T. Nakamura, Wave effects in the grav- itational lensing of gravitational waves from chirping bi- naries, The Astrophysical Journal595, 1039 (2003)

    2003

  51. [51]

    M. H. Cheung, J. Gais, O. A. Hannuksela, and T. G. Li, Stellar-mass microlensing of gravitational waves, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society503, 3326 (2021)

    2021

  52. [52]

    X. Shan, B. Hu, X. Chen, and R.-G. Cai, An interference- based method for the detection of strongly lensed gravi- tational waves, Nature Astronomy9, 916 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    E. Seo, O. A. Hannuksela, and T. G. F. Li, Improving Detection of Gravitational-wave Microlensing Using Re- peated Signals Induced by Strong Lensing, Astrophys. J. 932, 50 (2022), arXiv:2110.03308 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    Basak, A

    S. Basak, A. Ganguly, K. Haris, S. Kapadia, A. K. Mehta, and P. Ajith, Constraints on Compact Dark Matter from Gravitational Wave Microlensing, Astrophys. J.926, L28 (2022), arXiv:2109.06456 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    Prabhu, U

    G. Prabhu, U. Deka, S. Chakraborty, and S. J. Ka- padia, Probing the spin of compact objects with grav- itational microlensing of gravitational waves, (2025), arXiv:2512.18707 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    U. Deka, S. Chakraborty, S. J. Kapadia, M. A. Shaikh, and P. Ajith, Probing the charge of compact objects with gravitational microlensing of gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D111, 064028 (2025), arXiv:2401.06553 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    E. Seo, X. Shan, J. Janquart, O. Hannuksela, M. Hendry, and B. Hu, Residual test to search for microlensing sig- natures in strongly lensed gravitational wave signals, The Astrophysical Journal988, 159 (2025)

    2025

  58. [58]

    Chakraborty and S

    A. Chakraborty and S. Mukherjee,µ-glance: A novel technique to detect chromatically and achromatically lensed gravitational-wave signals, The Astrophysical Journal984, 107 (2025)

    2025

  59. [59]

    Chakraborty and S

    A. Chakraborty and S. Mukherjee, The first model- independent chromatic microlensing search: No evidence in the gravitational wave catalog of ligo–virgo–kagra, The Astrophysical Journal990, 68 (2025)

    2025

  60. [60]

    Chakraborty and S

    A. Chakraborty and S. Mukherjee, The first model- independent upper bound on microlensing signature of the highest-mass binary black hole event gw231123, The Astrophysical Journal1003, 20 (2026)

    2026

  61. [61]

    A. Nitz, I. Harry, D. Brown, C. M. Biwer, J. Willis, T. D. Canton, C. Capano, T. Dent, L. Pekowsky, A. R. Williamson, S. De, M. Cabero, B. Machen- schalk, D. Macleod, P. Kumar, S. Reyes, F. Pannar- ale, G. S. C. Davies, dfinstad, S. Kumar, M. T´ apai, L. Singer, S. Khan, S. Fairhurst, A. Nielsen, S. Singh, 16 T. Massinger, K. Chandra, Shasvath, and Veroni...

    2022

  62. [62]

    J. C. Chan, E. Seo, A. K. Li, H. Fong, and J. M. Ezquiaga, Detectability of lensed gravitational waves in matched-filtering searches, Physical Review D111, 084019 (2025)

    2025

  63. [63]

    Mishra, N

    A. Mishra, N. Krishnendu, and A. Ganguly, Unveiling mi- crolensing biases in testing general relativity with gravi- tational waves, Physical Review D110, 084009 (2024)

    2024

  64. [64]

    S. Husa, S. Khan, M. Hannam, M. P¨ urrer, F. Ohme, X. J. Forteza, and A. Boh´ e, Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. i. new nu- merical waveforms and anatomy of the signal, Physical Review D93, 044006 (2016)

    2016

  65. [65]

    S. Khan, S. Husa, M. Hannam, F. Ohme, M. P¨ urrer, X. J. Forteza, and A. Boh´ e, Frequency-domain gravita- tional waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. ii. a phenomenological model for the advanced detector era, Physical Review D93, 044007 (2016)

    2016

  66. [66]

    K.-H. Lai, O. A. Hannuksela, A. Herrera-Mart ´ ın, J. M. Diego, T. Broadhurst, and T. G. F. Li, Discovering intermediate-mass black hole lenses through gravita- tional wave lensing, Phys. Rev. D98, 083005 (2018)

    2018

  67. [67]

    Deguchi and W

    S. Deguchi and W. D. Watson, Diffraction in Gravita- tional Lensing for Compact Objects of Low Mass, Astro- phys. J.307, 30 (1986)

    1986

  68. [68]

    T. T. Nakamura, Gravitational lensing of gravitational waves from inspiraling binaries by a point mass lens, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1138 (1998)

    1998

  69. [69]

    Buonanno, B

    A. Buonanno, B. R. Iyer, E. Ochsner, Y. Pan, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Comparison of post-newtonian templates for compact binary inspiral signals¡? for- mat?¿ in gravitational-wave detectors, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology80, 084043 (2009)

    2009

  70. [70]

    J. M. Ezquiaga, D. E. Holz, W. Hu, M. Lagos, and R. M. Wald, Phase effects from strong gravitational lensing of gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D103, 064047 (2021)

    2021

  71. [71]

    As will be clear in the forthcoming text, the prescription to construct the product template bank is independent of the nature of the templates and the physics that goes into their construction (e.g, spinning vs non-spinning, etc)

  72. [72]

    S. D. Mohanty and S. V. Dhurandhar, Hierarchical search strategy for the detection of gravitational waves from co- alescing binaries, Phys. Rev. D54, 7108 (1996)

    1996

  73. [73]

    S. D. Mohanty, Hierarchical search strategy for the de- tection of gravitational waves from coalescing binaries: Extension to post-newtonian waveforms, Phys. Rev. D 57, 630 (1998)

    1998

  74. [74]

    A. S. Sengupta, S. V. Dhurandhar, A. Lazzarini, and T. Prince, Extended hierarchical search (ehs) algorithm for detection of gravitational waves from inspiralling com- pact binaries, Classical and Quantum Gravity19, 1507 (2002)

    2002

  75. [75]

    A. S. Sengupta, S. Dhurandhar, and A. Lazzarini, Faster implementation of the hierarchical search algorithm for detection of gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D67, 082004 (2003)

    2003

  76. [76]

    Gadre, S

    B. Gadre, S. Mitra, and S. Dhurandhar, Hierarchical search strategy for the efficient detection of gravitational waves from nonprecessing coalescing compact binaries with aligned-spins, Phys. Rev. D99, 124035 (2019)

    2019

  77. [77]

    K. Soni, B. U. Gadre, S. Mitra, and S. Dhurandhar, Hi- erarchical search for compact binary coalescences in the advanced ligo’s first two observing runs, Phys. Rev. D 105, 064005 (2022)

    2022

  78. [78]

    Because of enhanced sensitivity, the number of merger events is expected to increase drastically, by 103 or more

    and the Einstein Telescope [79]. Because of enhanced sensitivity, the number of merger events is expected to increase drastically, by 103 or more. This, in turn, would increase the chance of observing microlensed events. A product template bank such as the one we describe in this work, in tandem with a hierarchical search strategy mentioned above, will be...

    2023

  79. [79]

    Punturo, M

    M. Punturo, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, B. Allen, N. Andersson, K. Arun, F. Barone, B. Barr, M. Bar- suglia, M. Beker, N. Beveridge, S. Birindelli, S. Bose, L. Bosi, S. Braccini, C. Bradaschia, T. Bulik, E. Cal- loni, G. Cella, E. C. Mottin, S. Chelkowski, A. Chin- carini, J. Clark, E. Coccia, C. Colacino, J. Colas, A. Cumming, L. Cunningham, E. Cuoco, S. ...

    2010

  80. [80]

    Evans, A

    M. Evans, A. Corsi, C. Afle, A. Ananyeva, K. G. Arun, S. Ballmer, A. Bandopadhyay, L. Barsotti, M. Baryakhtar, E. Berger, E. Berti, S. Biscov- eanu, S. Borhanian, F. Broekgaarden, D. A. Brown, C. Cahillane, L. Campbell, H.-Y. Chen, K. J. Daniel, A. Dhani, J. C. Driggers, A. Effler, R. Eisenstein, S. Fairhurst, J. Feicht, P. Fritschel, P. Fulda, I. Gupta, ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.