Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 123 references

Exploring Physics beyond the Standard Model from kHz-Gravitational-Wave Signals of Core-Collapse Supernovae

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A Galactic core-collapse supernova caught with a kilohertz-sensitive detector could reveal whether quark deconfinement, scalar-tensor gravity, or black-hole formation is at work inside the collapsing core.

desk verdict Solid topical review of kHz supernova GW predictions; the 'smoking gun' framing runs ahead of the 2D-axisymmetric burst templates, but it deserves peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.20921 v2 pith:RPDFWQX4 submitted 2026-07-23 astro-ph.HE gr-qchep-th

Kei Kotake , Takami Kuroda This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEgr-qchep-th
keywords core-collapsesupernovaegravitationalwaveskilohertzbandproto-neutronstaroscillationsQCDphasetransitionspontaneousscalarizationblackholeformationmulti-messengerastronomy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This topical review assembles the case that kilohertz gravitational waves from a core-collapse supernova are a direct, live readout of the proto-neutron star's internal state, and that the same band carries distinct signatures of exotic physics. The standard signal is a rising chirp: as the newborn neutron star accretes and contracts, its $g$- and $f$-mode oscillations sweep from a few hundred hertz into the kilohertz range, tracing the compactness $M/R$. The review then argues that three beyond-standard channels—rapid black-hole formation, a first-order QCD phase transition, and spontaneous scalarization in scalar-tensor gravity—each imprint a recognizable high-frequency pattern, including millisecond bursts above roughly 2 kHz and abrupt signal cutoffs. If true, one Galactic event caught by a kHz-sensitive detector, combined with a coincident neutrino burst, could discriminate among these scenarios and test both dense-matter physics and general relativity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the proto-neutron star and its characteristic oscillation modes, the buoyancy-driven $g$-mode and the fundamental $f$-mode, whose eigenfrequencies depend on the surface gravity ($M_{\mathrm{PNS}}/R_{\mathrm{PNS}}^2$) and the mean density ($\sqrt{M_{\mathrm{PNS}}/R_{\mathrm{PNS}}^3}$), respectively. The review uses the analytic peak-frequency relation $f_{\mathrm{peak}} \propto M_{\mathrm{PNS}}/R_{\mathrm{PNS}}^2$ to connect the time-dependent GW spectrogram to the remnant's compactness, and identifies the convective plumes behind the bounce shocks—standard, second-bounce, or scalarization-induced—as the common agent that excites the oscillations. This machinery turns a spectrogram into a diagnostic: the rising chirp measures contraction, the abrupt cutoff marks horizon formation, and the burst above roughly 2 kHz marks the QCD or scalarization second collapse.

What would settle it

Run the hybrid-equation-of-state and scalar-tensor collapse scenarios in full three-dimensional numerical relativity; if the convection behind the second-bounce shock is suppressed or quenched in 3D, the predicted bursts above roughly 2 kHz would not appear, and the claimed smoking-gun signatures lose their anchor. Alternatively, a Galactic supernova observed by a third-generation detector that shows the standard rising chirp but no kilohertz burst when such a channel is expected would count against these predictions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the evolution of the gravitational-wave peak frequency, set by the Brunt–Väisälä frequency at the proto-neutron-star surface and scaling as $f_{\mathrm{peak}} \propto M_{\mathrm{PNS}}/R_{\mathrm{PNS}}^2$, encodes the contraction of the remnant, while the amplitude tracks the mass-accretion rate that excites the oscillations. In the standard picture, the $g$-then-$f$ mode sweep reaching roughly 1 kHz within about a second after bounce is the expected baseline. The review argues that beyond-standard scenarios break this baseline in identifiable ways: a very massive progenitor produces an early, broad kHz band that dies abruptly when the black hole forms; a strong first-order QCD phase transition triggers a second collapse and bounce whose post-shock convection radiates a millisecond burst from roughly 500 Hz to beyond 2.5 kHz; and spontaneous scalarization in scalar-tensor theories causes repeated collapses with similar broadband kHz emission. Combined with the accompanying electron-antineutrino burst, these signals form what the authors call a multi-messenger pathway to smoking-gun signatures of new physics beyond the standard model of the core-collapse mechanism and general relativity.

Load-bearing premise

The predicted loud kilohertz bursts for the QCD-transition and scalarization scenarios come from two-dimensional axisymmetric simulations that leave out three-dimensional fluid instabilities; if those instabilities damp the convection behind the second shock, the bursts would be weaker or absent.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A Galactic core-collapse supernova observed with a kHz-sensitive third-generation detector would let astronomers read off the proto-neutron star's $M/R$ evolution directly from the chirping $g$/$f$-mode frequencies.
  • An early onset of kHz emission within the first few hundred milliseconds after bounce, followed by sudden silence, would be a strong indicator that the remnant collapsed to a black hole.
  • A millisecond burst stretching above roughly 2 kHz, coincident with an electron-antineutrino burst, would point to a first-order QCD phase transition inside the nascent remnant.
  • A similar broadband kHz burst without a clear single-collapse cutoff, repeated in time, would point toward spontaneous scalarization in scalar-tensor theories of gravity.
  • The same GW observations would distinguish these exotic scenarios from ordinary neutrino-driven explosions even though the frequencies lie above the most sensitive band of current ground-based detectors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: because $f_{\mathrm{peak}}$ tracks $M/R$ rather than the detailed nuclear equation of state, a single detected chirp could be inverted as a proto-neutron-star mass–radius measurement, turning each Galactic supernova into an asteroseismology experiment.
  • Inference: the QCD and scalarization bursts look similar in spectrograms, so combining the GW burst shape with neutrino arrival times and energies is a testable way to separate quark-matter deconfinement from modified gravity.
  • Inference: the predicted amplitudes rest on axisymmetric simulations; the immediate extension is to test the same hybrid-equation-of-state and scalar-tensor scenarios in full three dimensions, where non-axisymmetric instabilities and turbulence could either amplify or suppress the post-shock kHz emission.
  • Inference: if a future detector network sees a kHz burst but no coincident neutrino spike, that combination would favor an exotic mechanism over the standard neutrino-driven picture, whose second bounce is always accompanied by a neutrino signal.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This topical review surveys high-frequency (kHz) gravitational-wave (GW) emission from core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe), synthesizing results from recent multidimensional simulations. It first describes the standard mechanism: proto-neutron-star (PNS) g- and f-mode oscillations excited by accretion, with frequencies ramping up as the PNS contracts (Eq. (1)). It then covers non-standard scenarios: early black-hole formation in very massive progenitors, a first-order QCD phase transition inducing a second collapse and bounce, and spontaneous scalarization in scalar-tensor gravity. The review argues that the combined detection of kHz GW bursts and coincident neutrino signals by next-generation detectors could provide smoking-gun evidence of new physics in the collapse mechanism or in gravity. The paper is largely based on the authors' own recent simulations [50,53], with some new analysis (e.g., the Brunt–Väisälä frequency profile in Fig. 6).

Significance. If the central claim holds, a single Galactic CCSN observed with a kHz-sensitive detector could simultaneously probe the QCD equation of state at supra-nuclear densities and test scalar-tensor gravity in a regime inaccessible to other experiments. The review is timely, clearly organized, and transparent about some of its uncertainties, including the ~100 Hz mismatch between perturbation theory and the spectrogram (Section 2.2), the unresolved g-to-f mode transition, and the present inability to distinguish QCD and scalarization scenarios. Its strengths include the explicit presentation of the f_peak scaling and the relativistic Brunt–Väisälä frequency formula, the use of publicly available or previously published simulation results, and a clear multi-messenger framing. The main weakness is that the detectability promise for the exotic bursts rests on 2D axisymmetric amplitudes whose 3D robustness is not assessed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sections 4.1, 4.2, and 5] The smoking-gun claim depends directly on the kilohertz burst amplitudes from 2D axisymmetric simulations: A_+ ~ 250 cm for model s50 (Section 4.1, Fig. 5) and the analogous bursts in the scalarization model (Section 4.2, Fig. 9). Axisymmetry restricts convection to toroidal cells, which artificially enhances quadrupole emission coherence; 3D turbulent convection generally reduces the strain at a given frequency, potentially by a factor of a few. Since Fig. 7 shows the s50 signal near the current detector noise floor, a factor-of-few suppression in a 3D realization could place the burst below the sensitivity of next-generation detectors. The review uses a 3D simulation for the standard mechanism in Section 2.1 and notes the importance of non-axisymmetric instabilities, but it never quantifies or even explicitly acknowledges this dimensional dependence for the exotic models. I recommend adding a dedicated caveat in Sections 4.1/4.2 and, ideally, a quantitative estimate of the 3D uncertainty band on the detectability claim.
  2. [Section 5 and Abstract] The central claim that the exotic bursts would be detectable by next-generation detectors is not supported by any quantitative sensitivity analysis. Fig. 7 compares the model spectra only with aLIGO, AdV, and KAGRA noise curves; despite repeated references to Cosmic Explorer, Einstein Telescope, and NEMO, neither their noise curves nor a signal-to-noise estimate for the 4 ms bursts at 10 kpc is provided. The paper should either add the relevant sensitivity curves to Fig. 7 or state explicitly that the detectability statement is qualitative, so that the 'smoking-gun' language in the abstract and Section 5 is commensurate with the evidence presented.
  3. [Section 4.2] The review acknowledges that it is 'not yet clear whether future GW and neutrino observations will be able to distinguish these two types of events' (QCD phase transition vs. scalarization), yet the abstract and Section 5 claim that combined analysis offers 'smoking-gun signatures of new physics beyond the standard model of the CCSN GW mechanism and general relativity.' These statements are not formally contradictory, but the notion of a smoking gun is weakened by the admitted degeneracy. The authors should clarify what discriminating observable (e.g., the timing of the anti-neutrino burst relative to the GW burst, or the number of collapse episodes) would uniquely identify each scenario, or temper the abstract accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.2] There is a typo: 'the deviation ... seen at a late phase (t_pb ≳400 Hz)' should read 't_pb ≳400 ms'.
  2. [Section 2.3, Figures 3–5] The sign convention for the mass accretion rate is used implicitly (negative ˙M means accretion, positive ˙M means net outflow), but it is never defined in the text or figure captions; this should be stated explicitly to avoid confusion.
  3. [Title and Abstract] The phrase 'Physics beyond the Standard Model' in the title is potentially misleading because a QCD phase transition is itself a Standard Model phenomenon; the abstract clarifies the intended meaning, but the title should be reworded (e.g., 'beyond the standard CCSN GW emission mechanism') to prevent misinterpretation in a particle-physics readership.
  4. [Section 1, footnote 1] The footnote is useful but slightly undercuts the main text's statement that rotating models do not produce high-frequency GWs; consider moving the detailed caveat into the main text for clarity.
  5. [Figure 7] The figure caption does not state that the plotted quantity is the characteristic GW amplitude (presumably \sqrt{f} h_c or similar); please make the definition explicit, since the comparison with detector noise curves depends on this convention.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review's claims rest on independent published simulations and established scalings; self-citations are not load-bearing reductions.

full rationale

This is a topical review, not a derivation paper. The central predictions (kHz bursts from a QCD phase transition and from spontaneous scalarization) are imported from [50] and [53], which are separate numerical-relativity studies with published methods and assumptions; the review does not fit any parameter and then rename it a prediction. Equation (1) is an established analytic scaling from Murphy et al. (2009) and Müller et al. (2013), used only as an overlay on spectrograms, while Equation (2) is the standard relativistic Brunt–Väisälä frequency from [22], used to interpret the simulated emission rather than to generate the signals. The f_peak curve is compared with the spectrograms, not fitted to them. The extended reliance on the authors' own earlier simulations is self-citation in a bibliographic sense, but those works are fully published, code-described, and parameter-free with stated assumptions, so they constitute independent evidence under the rules and do not raise the circularity score. The review also explicitly flags the small number of exotic-scenario simulations and the unknowns in the ST-theory parameters, so no claim is presented as forced by definition or by a self-citation chain. The skeptical concern about 2D axisymmetry inflating burst coherence is a modeling limitation and correctness risk, not a circularity of the argument.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This review introduces no new free parameters; the two listed are inherited from the cited hybrid EoS and scalar-tensor model. The central claims rest on domain assumptions about the existence of strong first-order QCD transitions and spontaneous scalarization, the fidelity of 2D simulations, and future detector performance. No new physical entities are invented.

free parameters (2)
  • QCD phase transition onset density (rho_trans)
    Sets the timing and strength of the second collapse in the s50 model (Section 4.1). Chosen in the hybrid EoS of [50,91], not by this review.
  • Scalar mass and coupling constants in the massive scalar-tensor theory
    Control whether spontaneous scalarization occurs in the beyond-GR model (Section 4.2). Values adopted from [53]; not fitted here.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption A strong first-order QCD phase transition from hadronic to quark matter occurs at densities reached in the PNS core.
    Section 4.1 depends on this to produce a second collapse and kHz burst. The existence of such a transition is not observationally established.
  • domain assumption Massive scalar-tensor theories of gravity exhibit spontaneous scalarization in proto-neutron stars.
    Section 4.2 relies on this for multiple collapses and bursts. This is an alternative theory with no observational evidence in this regime.
  • domain assumption The 2D axisymmetric simulations of [50,53] adequately capture the high-frequency GW emission mechanisms.
    All exotic-scenario waveforms and spectra are from 2D models; 3D effects could alter amplitudes and frequencies.
  • domain assumption Next-generation GW detectors will reach the sensitivity in the kHz band that the detectability discussion assumes.
    The central 'pathway' claim depends on detectors like Cosmic Explorer, Einstein Telescope, and NEMO achieving projected sensitivities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring Physics beyond the Standard Model from kHz-Gravitational-Wave Signals of Core-Collapse Supernovae." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RPDFWQX4

@misc{pith2026260720921,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring Physics beyond the Standard Model from kHz-Gravitational-Wave Signals of Core-Collapse Supernovae},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RPDFWQX4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20921}
}
abstract

Recent advances in multidimensional modeling of core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) have enabled detailed predictions of high-frequency gravitational-wave (GW) signals, offering a new probe of extreme matter and gravity. A proto-neutron star (PNS) emits quasi-continuous GWs through the excitation of its characteristic oscillation modes. State-of-the-art CCSN simulations show that these oscillations, in particular $g$- and $f$-modes, dominate the GW spectrum, with frequencies rising from a few hundred hertz to the kilohertz (kHz) range as the PNS compactness increases in the post-bounce phase. Therefore, the temporal evolution of these GW frequencies, if detected, would provide a direct and quantitative tracer of the PNS internal structure and the surrounding explosive dynamics. In addition to such standard GW emission mechanism, fully general relativistic (GR) simulations have revealed additional GW sources linked to more exotic physical processes. In highly massive progenitors, continuous mass accretion drives rapid PNS contraction and early black-hole (BH) formation, producing strong kHz GW emission that abruptly ceases when the PNS core is swallowed by the BH horizon. Similarly, a strong first-order quantum chromodynamics (QCD) phase transition can induce a secondary collapse and rebound of the nascent quark core, generating powerful, millisecond-duration GW bursts with frequencies exceeding $\sim$2 kHz. Alternative theories of gravity, such as scalar-tensor frameworks, predict spontaneous scalarization that can trigger multiple collapses of the PNS, yielding analogous high-frequency and broadband GW signals. The combined analysis of these GW signals, together with their detection by next-generation GW detectors, offers a promising multi-messenger pathway to identify smoking-gun signatures of new physics beyond the standard model of the CCSN GW mechanism and general relativity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20921 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. GW waveform (top panel) and the spectrogram from a 3D CCSN model (bottom panel) using a binary progenitor model of SN 1987A [33]. An observer is assumed to be located along the equatorial direction at a distance of 10 kpc. In the bottom panel, some characteristic GW frequencies of the f, gi, and pi modes with the subscript of i being the radial node numbers are overplotted, where an open source code (GREAT; [4]) was… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Post-bounce evolution of the averaged shock radius rshock (top left) and the diagnostic explosion energy Eexp (bottom left), taken from [50], and the non-dimensional compactness parameter M/R of the PNS for all models (right). In the upper-left panel, we distinguish the core-bounce shock (dash-dotted line) and the second-bounce shock (solid line). 2.3 Dependence on the progenitor mass In the previous section, we dis… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. GW waveform A+ (black line in the top panels) and the corresponding spectrogram (colour coded in the bottom panels), mass accretion rate measured at r = 500 km (red line in the top panels), and the analytical expression for fpeak (black/white line in the bottom panels), for z9.6 (left) and s11.2 (right). We show only the non-vanishing component of the axisymmetric profile A+ ≡ Dh+ as seen along the equatorial plane,… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spherically averaged spatial profiles of the Brunt–V¨ais¨al¨a frequency ωBV for s50 around the second bounce. We focus on the region above the quark-matter core and select two representative time slices at tp2b = −0.01 ms (red line) and tp2b = 0.05 ms (blue line). The …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Characteristic GW spectral amplitudes for the models discussed in Sections 2, 3, and 4.1, assuming a source distance of 10 kpc. The noise amplitudes of aLIGO (orange line), AdV (magenta line), and KAGRA (green line) are shown for comparison. Taken from [50]. 4.2 Format…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Overall evolution of all models. Panel (a): maximum rest-mass density ρmax; (b): PNS rest mass MPNS and central lapse function αc; (c): central scalar field φc and 2-norm of the Hamiltonian constraint ||H||2 × 10−4 ; (d): averaged shock radius Rs (dashed) and diagnosti…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Panel (a): matter-origin GWs Dh+; (b): spectrogram h˜(f, t) of h+. We assume a source distance of D = 10 kpc. Modified from the original version in [53]. Taken from [53], but slightly modified. across a wider parameter space become available, our understanding will imp…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Long-Term Multidimensional Models of Core-Collapse Supernovae: Progress and Challenges

    Hans-Thomas Janka. Long-Term Multidimensional Models of Core-Collapse Supernovae: Progress and Challenges. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 75(1):425–461, September 2025

    2025

  2. [2]

    Kokkotas and Bernd G

    Kostas D. Kokkotas and Bernd G. Schmidt. Quasi-Normal Modes of Stars and Black Holes. Living Reviews in Relativity, 2(1):2, December 1999

    1999

  3. [3]

    Jim Fuller, Hannah Klion, Ernazar Abdikamalov, and Christian D. Ott. Supernova seismology: gravitational wave signatures of rapidly rotating core collapse. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 450(1):414–427, June 2015

    2015

  4. [4]

    Alejandro Torres-Forn´ e, Pablo Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, Andrea Passamonti, Martin Obergaulinger, and Jos´ e A. Font. Towards asteroseismology of core-collapse supernovae with gravitational wave 14 IOP PublishingCQG(2026) observations - II. Inclusion of space-time perturbations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 482(3):3967–3988, January 2019

    2026

  5. [5]

    The Gravitational Wave Signal from Core-collapse Supernovae

    Viktoriya Morozova, David Radice, Adam Burrows, and David Vartanyan. The Gravitational Wave Signal from Core-collapse Supernovae. Astrophys. J., 861(1):10, July 2018

    2018

  6. [6]

    Font, and Renate Meyer

    Marie-Anne Bizouard, Patricio Maturana-Russel, Alejandro Torres-Forn´ e, Martin Obergaulinger, Pablo Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, Nelson Christensen, Jos´ e A. Font, and Renate Meyer. Inference of protoneutron star properties from gravitational-wave data in core-collapse supernovae. Phys. Rev. D, 103(6):063006, March 2021

    2021

  7. [7]

    Font, and Renate Meyer

    Tristan Bruel, Marie-Anne Bizouard, Martin Obergaulinger, Patricio Maturana-Russel, Alejandro Torres-Forn´ e, Pablo Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, Nelson Christensen, Jos´ e A. Font, and Renate Meyer. Inference of protoneutron star properties in core-collapse supernovae from a gravitational-wave detector network. Phys. Rev. D, 107(8):083029, April 2023

    2023

  8. [8]

    Dimmelmeier, C

    H. Dimmelmeier, C. D. Ott, A. Marek, and H.-T. Janka. Gravitational wave burst signal from core collapse of rotating stars. Phys. Rev. D, 78(6):064056, September 2008

    2008

Show all 123 references
  1. [10]

    C. D. Ott, C. Reisswig, E. Schnetter, E. O’Connor, U. Sperhake, F. L¨ offler, P. Diener, E. Abdikamalov, I. Hawke, and A. Burrows. Dynamics and Gravitational Wave Signature of Collapsar Formation. Physical Review Letters, 106(16):161103, April 2011

    2011

  2. [11]

    DeMaio, and Christian D

    Ernazar Abdikamalov, Sarah Gossan, Alexandra M. DeMaio, and Christian D. Ott. Measuring the angular momentum distribution in core-collapse supernova progenitors with gravitational waves. Phys. Rev. D, 90:044001, Aug 2014

    2014

  3. [12]

    Zwerger and E

    T. Zwerger and E. M¨ uller. Dynamics and gravitational wave signature of axisymmetric rotational core collapse. Astron. Astrophys., 320:209–227, April 1997

    1997

  4. [13]

    Dimmelmeier, J

    H. Dimmelmeier, J. A. Font, and E. M¨ uller. Relativistic simulations of rotational core collapse II. Collapse dynamics and gravitational radiation. Astron. Astrophys., 393:523–542, October 2002

    2002

  5. [14]

    J. M. Blondin and A. Mezzacappa. Pulsar spins from an instability in the accretion shock of supernovae. Nature, 445:58–60, January 2007

    2007

  6. [15]

    Kuroda, T

    T. Kuroda, T. Takiwaki, and K. Kotake. Gravitational wave signatures from low-mode spiral instabilities in rapidly rotating supernova cores. Phys. Rev. D, 89(4):044011, February 2014

    2014

  7. [16]

    Anisotropic emission of neutrino and gravitational-wave signals from rapidly rotating core-collapse supernovae

    Tomoya Takiwaki and Kei Kotake. Anisotropic emission of neutrino and gravitational-wave signals from rapidly rotating core-collapse supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 475(1):L91–L95, Mar 2018

    2018

  8. [17]

    Characteristic time variability of gravitational-wave and neutrino signals from three-dimensional simulations of non-rotating and rapidly rotating stellar core collapse

    Shota Shibagaki, Takami Kuroda, Kei Kotake, and Tomoya Takiwaki. Characteristic time variability of gravitational-wave and neutrino signals from three-dimensional simulations of non-rotating and rapidly rotating stellar core collapse. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 502(2):3066–308...

    2021

  9. [18]

    Bugli, J

    M. Bugli, J. Guilet, T. Foglizzo, and M. Obergaulinger. Three-dimensional core-collapse supernovae with complex magnetic structures - II. Rotational instabilities and multimessenger signatures. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 520(4):5622–5634, April 2023

    2023

  10. [19]

    Trends in gravitational wave emission in axisymmetric simulations of rotating core-collapse supernovae

    Bailey Sykes and Bernhard M¨ uller. Trends in gravitational wave emission in axisymmetric simulations of rotating core-collapse supernovae. Phys. Rev. D, 113(10):103049, May 2026

    2026

  11. [20]

    Core-Collapse Supernovae and their Gravitational Wave Signals: The Status of Theory and Modeling

    Bernhard M¨ uller. Core-Collapse Supernovae and their Gravitational Wave Signals: The Status of Theory and Modeling. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2603.24243, March 2026

    2026 arXiv

  12. [21]

    J. W. Murphy, C. D. Ott, and A. Burrows. A Model for Gravitational Wave Emission from Neutrino-Driven Core-Collapse Supernovae. Astrophys. J., 707:1173–1190, December 2009. 15 IOP PublishingCQG(2026)

    2026

  13. [22]

    M¨ uller, H.-T

    B. M¨ uller, H.-T. Janka, and A. Marek. A New Multi-dimensional General Relativistic Neutrino Hydrodynamics Code of Core-collapse Supernovae. III. Gravitational Wave Signals from Supernova Explosion Models. Astrophys. J., 766:43, March 2013

    2013

  14. [23]

    M¨ uller and H.-T

    E. M¨ uller and H.-T. Janka. Gravitational radiation from convective instabilities in Type II supernova explosions. Astron. Astrophys., 317:140–163, January 1997

    1997

  15. [24]

    M¨ uller, M

    E. M¨ uller, M. Rampp, R. Buras, H.-T. Janka, and D. H. Shoemaker. Toward Gravitational Wave Signals from Realistic Core-Collapse Supernova Models. Astrophys. J., 603:221–230, March 2004

    2004

  16. [25]

    M¨ uller, H.-T

    E. M¨ uller, H.-T. Janka, and A. Wongwathanarat. Parametrized 3D models of neutrino-driven supernova explosions. Neutrino emission asymmetries and gravitational-wave signals. Astron. Astrophys., 537:A63, January 2012

    2012

  17. [26]

    Andresen, B

    H. Andresen, B. M¨ uller, E. M¨ uller, and H.-T. Janka. Gravitational wave signals from 3D neutrino hydrodynamics simulations of core-collapse supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 468:2032–2051, June 2017

    2017

  18. [27]

    Characterizing the Gravitational Wave Signal from Core-collapse Supernovae

    David Radice, Viktoriya Morozova, Adam Burrows, David Vartanyan, and Hiroki Nagakura. Characterizing the Gravitational Wave Signal from Core-collapse Supernovae. Astrophys. J. Lett., 876(1):L9, May 2019

    2019

  19. [28]

    Three-dimensional core-collapse supernova simulations of massive and rotating progenitors

    Jade Powell and Bernhard M¨ uller. Three-dimensional core-collapse supernova simulations of massive and rotating progenitors. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 494(4):4665–4675, June 2020

    2020

  20. [29]

    Andresen, R

    H. Andresen, R. Glas, and H. Th Janka. Gravitational-wave signals from 3D supernova simulations with different neutrino-transport methods. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 503(3):3552–3567, May 2021

    2021

  21. [30]

    Couch, and Evan P

    Oliver Eggenberger Andersen, Shuai Zha, Andr´ e da Silva Schneider, Aurore Betranhandy, Sean M. Couch, and Evan P. O’Connor. Equation-of-state Dependence of Gravitational Waves in Core-collapse Supernovae. Astrophys. J., 923(2):201, December 2021

    2021

  22. [31]

    Insights into non-axisymmetric instabilities in three-dimensional rotating supernova models with neutrino and gravitational-wave signatures

    Tomoya Takiwaki, Kei Kotake, and Thierry Foglizzo. Insights into non-axisymmetric instabilities in three-dimensional rotating supernova models with neutrino and gravitational-wave signatures. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 508(1):966–985, November 2021

    2021

  23. [32]

    Richardson, Michele Zanolin, Haakon Andresen, Marek J

    Colter J. Richardson, Michele Zanolin, Haakon Andresen, Marek J. Szczepa´ nczyk, Kiranjyot Gill, and Annop Wongwathanarat. Modeling core-collapse supernovae gravitational-wave memory in laser interferometric data. Phys. Rev. D, 105(10):103008, May 2022

    2022

  24. [33]

    Three-dimensional simulation of a core-collapse supernova for a binary star progenitor of SN 1987A

    Ko Nakamura, Tomoya Takiwaki, and Kei Kotake. Three-dimensional simulation of a core-collapse supernova for a binary star progenitor of SN 1987A. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 514(3):3941–3952, August 2022

    2022

  25. [34]

    David Vartanyan, Adam Burrows, Tianshu Wang, Matthew S. B. Coleman, and Christopher J. White. Gravitational-wave signature of core-collapse supernovae. Phys. Rev. D, 107(10):103015, May 2023

    2023

  26. [35]

    Landfield, Eric J

    Anthony Mezzacappa, Pedro Marronetti, Ryan E. Landfield, Eric J. Lentz, R. Daniel Murphy, W. Raphael Hix, J. Austin Harris, Stephen W. Bruenn, John M. Blondin, O. E. Bronson Messer, Jordi Casanova, and Luke L. Kronzer. Core collapse supernova gravitational wave emission for pr...

    2023

  27. [36]

    Gravitational Waves from Neutrino-Driven Core Collapse Supernovae: Predictions, Detection, and Parameter Estimation

    Anthony Mezzacappa and Michele Zanolin. Gravitational Waves from Neutrino-Driven Core Collapse Supernovae: Predictions, Detection, and Parameter Estimation. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2401.11635, January 2024

    2024 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Gravitational-wave and Gravitational-wave Memory Signatures of Core-collapse Supernovae

    Lyla Choi, Adam Burrows, and David Vartanyan. Gravitational-wave and Gravitational-wave Memory Signatures of Core-collapse Supernovae. Astrophys. J., 975(1):12, November 2024

    2024

  29. [38]

    Gravitational-Wave Signatures of Nonstandard Neutrino Properties in Collapsing Stellar Cores

    Jakob Ehring, Sajad Abbar, Hans-Thomas Janka, Georg Raffelt, Ko Nakamura, and Kei Kotake. Gravitational-Wave Signatures of Nonstandard Neutrino Properties in Collapsing Stellar Cores. Phys. Rev. Lett., 136(2):021201, January 2026. 16 IOP PublishingCQG(2026)

    2026

  30. [39]

    Gravitational-Wave Signals for Supernova Explosions of Three-Dimensional Progenitors

    Alessandro Lella, Giuseppe Lucente, Daniel Kresse, Robert Glas, H.-Thomas Janka, and Alessandro Mirizzi. Gravitational-Wave Signals for Supernova Explosions of Three-Dimensional Progenitors. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2602.02651, February 2026

    2026

  31. [40]

    Anthony Mezzacappa, Eirik Endeve, O. E. Bronson Messer, and Stephen W. Bruenn. Physical, numerical, and computational challenges of modeling neutrino transport in core-collapse supernovae. Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics, 6(1):4, December 2020

    2020

  32. [41]

    Physical mechanism of core-collapse supernovae that neutrinos drive

    Shoichi Yamada, Hiroki Nagakura, Ryuichiro Akaho, Akira Harada, Shun Furusawa, Wakana Iwakami, Hirotada Okawa, Hideo Matsufuru, and Kohsuke Sumiyoshi. Physical mechanism of core-collapse supernovae that neutrinos drive. Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B, 100(3):190–23...

    2024

  33. [42]

    Burrows and D

    A. Burrows and D. Vartanyan. Core-collapse supernova explosion theory. Nature, 589(7840):29–39, January 2021

    2021

  34. [43]

    Kotake, K

    K. Kotake, K. Sumiyoshi, S. Yamada, T. Takiwaki, T. Kuroda, Y. Suwa, and H. Nagakura. Core-collapse supernovae as supercomputing science: A status report toward six-dimensional simulations with exact Boltzmann neutrino transport in full general relativity. Progress of Theoreti...

    2012

  35. [44]

    Sagert, T

    I. Sagert, T. Fischer, M. Hempel, G. Pagliara, J. Schaffner-Bielich, A. Mezzacappa, F. K. Thielemann, and M. Liebend¨ orfer. Signals of the QCD Phase Transition in Core-Collapse Supernovae. Phys. Rev. Lett., 102(8):081101, Feb 2009

    2009

  36. [45]

    Stellar core collapse with hadron-quark phase transition

    Ken’ichiro Nakazato, Kohsuke Sumiyoshi, and Shoichi Yamada. Stellar core collapse with hadron-quark phase transition. Astron. Astrophys., 558:A50, October 2013

    2013

  37. [46]

    Bastian, Meng-Ru Wu, Petr Baklanov, Elena Sorokina, Sergei Blinnikov, Stefan Typel, Thomas Kl¨ ahn, and David B

    Tobias Fischer, Niels-Uwe F. Bastian, Meng-Ru Wu, Petr Baklanov, Elena Sorokina, Sergei Blinnikov, Stefan Typel, Thomas Kl¨ ahn, and David B. Blaschke. Quark deconfinement as a supernova explosion engine for massive blue supergiant stars. Nature Astronomy, 2:980–986, October 2018

    2018

  38. [47]

    Can phase transitions of superdense matter strengthen supernova explosions

    Mariko Takahara and Katsuhiko Sato. Can phase transitions of superdense matter strengthen supernova explosions. Physics Letters B, 156:17–21, 1985

    1985

  39. [48]

    N. A. Gentile, M. B. Aufderheide, G. J. Mathews, F. D. Swesty, and G. M. Fuller. The QCD Phase Transition and Supernova Core Collapse. Astrophys. J., 414:701, September 1993

    1993

  40. [49]

    Noshad Khosravi Largani, Tobias Fischer, and Niels Uwe F. Bastian. Constraining the onset density for the QCD phase transition with the neutrino signal from core-collapse supernovae. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2304.12316, April 2023

    2023 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Core-collapse Supernova Simulations and the Formation of Neutron Stars, Hybrid Stars, and Black Holes

    Takami Kuroda, Tobias Fischer, Tomoya Takiwaki, and Kei Kotake. Core-collapse Supernova Simulations and the Formation of Neutron Stars, Hybrid Stars, and Black Holes. Astrophys. J., 924(1):38, January 2022

    2022

  42. [51]

    O’Connor, Ming-chung Chu, Lap-Ming Lin, and Sean M

    Shuai Zha, Evan P. O’Connor, Ming-chung Chu, Lap-Ming Lin, and Sean M. Couch. Gravitational-wave Signature of a First-order Quantum Chromodynamics Phase Transition in Core-Collapse Supernovae. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125(5):051102, July 2020

    2020

  43. [52]

    Gravitational Waves from a Core g Mode in Supernovae as Probes of the High-Density Equation of State

    Pia Jakobus, Bernhard M¨ uller, Alexander Heger, Shuai Zha, Jade Powell, Anton Motornenko, Jan Steinheimer, and Horst St¨ ocker. Gravitational Waves from a Core g Mode in Supernovae as Probes of the High-Density Equation of State. Phys. Rev. Lett., 131(19):191201, November 2023

    2023

  44. [53]

    Spontaneous scalarization as a new core-collapse supernova mechanism and its multimessenger signals

    Takami Kuroda and Masaru Shibata. Spontaneous scalarization as a new core-collapse supernova mechanism and its multimessenger signals. Phys. Rev. D, 107(10):103025, May 2023

    2023

  45. [54]

    The final core collapse of pulsational pair instability supernovae

    Jade Powell, Bernhard M¨ uller, and Alexander Heger. The final core collapse of pulsational pair instability supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 503(2):2108–2122, May 2021

    2021

  46. [55]

    Rahman, H

    N. Rahman, H. T. Janka, G. Stockinger, and S. E. Woosley. Pulsational pair-instability supernovae: gravitational collapse, black hole formation, and beyond. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 512(3):4503–4540, May 2022. 17 IOP PublishingCQG(2026)

    2026

  47. [56]

    Failed supernova simulations beyond black hole formation

    Takami Kuroda and Masaru Shibata. Failed supernova simulations beyond black hole formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 526(1):152–159, November 2023

    2023

  48. [57]

    Liebend¨ orfer, O

    M. Liebend¨ orfer, O. E. B. Messer, A. Mezzacappa, S. W. Bruenn, C. Y. Cardall, and F.-K. Thielemann. A Finite Difference Representation of Neutrino Radiation Hydrodynamics in Spherically Symmetric General Relativistic Spacetime. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 150:263–316, January 2004

    2004

  49. [58]

    Sumiyoshi, S

    K. Sumiyoshi, S. Yamada, and H. Suzuki. Dynamics and Neutrino Signal of Black Hole Formation in Nonrotating Failed Supernovae. I. Equation of State Dependence. Astrophys. J., 667:382–394, September 2007

    2007

  50. [59]

    O’Connor and C

    E. O’Connor and C. D. Ott. Black Hole Formation in Failing Core-Collapse Supernovae. Astrophys. J., 730:70–+, April 2011

    2011

  51. [60]

    C. Chan, B. M¨ uller, A. Heger, R. Pakmor, and V. Springel. Black Hole Formation and Fallback during the Supernova Explosion of a 40 M ⊙ Star. Astrophys. J. Lett., 852:L19, January 2018

    2018

  52. [61]

    A full general relativistic neutrino radiation-hydrodynamics simulation of a collapsing very massive star and the formation of a black hole

    Takami Kuroda, Kei Kotake, Tomoya Takiwaki, and Friedrich-Karl Thielemann. A full general relativistic neutrino radiation-hydrodynamics simulation of a collapsing very massive star and the formation of a black hole. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 477(1):L80–L84, June 2018

    2018

  53. [62]

    C. D Ott. TOPICAL REVIEW: The gravitational-wave signature of core-collapse supernovae. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 26(6):063001, March 2009

    2009

  54. [63]

    C. L. Fryer and K. C. B. New. Gravitational Waves from Gravitational Collapse. Living Reviews in Relativity, 14:1–+, January 2011

    2011

  55. [64]

    K. Kotake. Multiple physical elements to determine the gravitational-wave signatures of core-collapse supernovae. Comptes Rendus Physique, 14:318–351, April 2013

    2013

  56. [65]

    Gravitational Waves from Core-Collapse Supernovae

    Ernazar Abdikamalov, Giulia Pagliaroli, and David Radice. Gravitational Waves from Core-Collapse Supernovae. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2010.04356, October 2020

    2010 arXiv

  57. [66]

    A progenitor model of SN 1987A based on the slow-merger scenario

    Takaki Urushibata, Koh Takahashi, Hideyuki Umeda, and Takashi Yoshida. A progenitor model of SN 1987A based on the slow-merger scenario. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 473(1):L101–L105, January 2018

    2018

  58. [67]

    Langanke, G

    K. Langanke, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, J. M. Sampaio, D. J. Dean, W. R. Hix, O. E. Messer, A. Mezzacappa, M. Liebend¨ orfer, H.-T. Janka, and M. Rampp. Electron Capture Rates on Nuclei and Implications for Stellar Core Collapse. Physical Review Letters, 90(24):241102, June 2003

    2003

  59. [68]

    Kotake, K

    K. Kotake, K. Sato, and K. Takahashi. Explosion mechanism, neutrino burst and gravitational wave in core-collapse supernovae. Reports on Progress in Physics, 69:971–1143, April 2006

    2006

  60. [69]

    Fischer, M

    T. Fischer, M. Hempel, I. Sagert, Y. Suwa, and J. Schaffner-Bielich. Symmetry energy impact in simulations of core-collapse supernovae. European Physical Journal A, 50:46, February 2014

    2014

  61. [70]

    Liebend¨ orfer, A

    M. Liebend¨ orfer, A. Mezzacappa, F.-K. Thielemann, O. E. Messer, W. R. Hix, and S. W. Bruenn. Probing the gravitational well: No supernova explosion in spherical symmetry with general relativistic Boltzmann neutrino transport. Phys. Rev. D, 63(10):103004, May 2001

    2001

  62. [71]

    Buras, M

    R. Buras, M. Rampp, H.-Th. Janka, and K. Kifonidis. Two-dimensional hydrodynamic core-collapse supernova simulations with spectral neutrino transport. I. Numerical method and results for a 15M odot star. Astron. Astrophys., 447(3):1049–1092, March 2006

    2006

  63. [72]

    Foglizzo

    T. Foglizzo. A Simple Toy Model of the Advective-Acoustic Instability. I. Perturbative Approach. Astrophys. J., 694:820–832, April 2009

    2009

  64. [73]

    Foglizzo, P

    T. Foglizzo, P. Galletti, L. Scheck, and H.-T. Janka. Instability of a Stalled Accretion Shock: Evidence for the Advective-Acoustic Cycle. Astrophys. J., 654:1006–1021, January 2007. 18 IOP PublishingCQG(2026)

    2026

  65. [74]

    Foglizzo, F

    T. Foglizzo, F. Masset, J. Guilet, and G. Durand. Shallow Water Analogue of the Standing Accretion Shock Instability: Experimental Demonstration and a Two-Dimensional Model. Physical Review Letters, 108(5):051103, February 2012

    2012

  66. [75]

    Krueger, J´ erˆ ome Novak, Micaela Oertel, J´ erˆ ome Margueron, Julien Faure, No¨ el Martin, Patrick Blottiau, Bruno Peres, and Gilles Durand

    Thierry Foglizzo, R´ emi Kazeroni, J´ erˆ ome Guilet, Fr´ ed´ eric Masset, Matthias Gonz´ alez, Brendan K. Krueger, J´ erˆ ome Novak, Micaela Oertel, J´ erˆ ome Margueron, Julien Faure, No¨ el Martin, Patrick Blottiau, Bruno Peres, and Gilles Durand. The Explosion Mechanism of...

    2015

  67. [76]

    Kuroda, K

    T. Kuroda, K. Kotake, and T. Takiwaki. A New Gravitational-wave Signature from Standing Accretion Shock Instability in Supernovae. Astrophys. J. Lett., 829:L14, September 2016

    2016

  68. [77]

    Circular polarization of gravitational waves from non-rotating supernova cores: a new probe into the pre-explosion hydrodynamics

    Kazuhiro Hayama, Takami Kuroda, Kei Kotake, and Tomoya Takiwaki. Circular polarization of gravitational waves from non-rotating supernova cores: a new probe into the pre-explosion hydrodynamics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 477(1):L96–L100, June 2018

    2018

  69. [78]

    A Linear and Quadratic Time-Frequency Analysis of Gravitational Waves from Core-collapse Supernovae

    Hajime Kawahara, Takami Kuroda, Tomoya Takiwaki, Kazuhiro Hayama, and Kei Kotake. A Linear and Quadratic Time-Frequency Analysis of Gravitational Waves from Core-collapse Supernovae. Astrophys. J., 867(2):126, November 2018

    2018

  70. [79]

    Kuroda, T

    T. Kuroda, T. Takiwaki, and K. Kotake. A New Multi-energy Neutrino Radiation-Hydrodynamics Code in Full General Relativity and Its Application to the Gravitational Collapse of Massive Stars. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 222:20, February 2016

    2016

  71. [80]

    Alejandro Torres-Forn´ e, Pablo Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, Andrea Passamonti, and Jos´ e A. Font. Towards asteroseismology of core-collapse supernovae with gravitational-wave observations - I. Cowling approximation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 474(4):5272–5286, March 2018

    2018

  72. [81]

    Daniel Murphy, Anthony Mezzacappa, Eric J

    R. Daniel Murphy, Anthony Mezzacappa, Eric J. Lentz, and Pedro Marronetti. Core collapse supernova gravitational wave sourcing and characterization based on three-dimensional models. Phys. Rev. D, 112(6):063062, September 2025

    2025

  73. [82]

    S. W. Bruenn, E. A. Raley, and A. Mezzacappa. Fluid Stability Below the Neutrinospheres of Supernova Progenitors and the Dominant Role of Lepto-Entropy Fingers. arXiv e-prints, pages astro–ph/0404099, April 2004

    2004

  74. [83]

    Buras, H.-T

    R. Buras, H.-T. Janka, M. Rampp, and K. Kifonidis. Two-dimensional hydrodynamic core-collapse supernova simulations with spectral neutrino transport. II. Models for different progenitor stars. Astron. Astrophys., 457:281–308, October 2006

    2006

  75. [84]

    Foglizzo, L

    T. Foglizzo, L. Scheck, and H.-T. Janka. Neutrino-driven Convection versus Advection in Core-Collapse Supernovae. Astrophys. J., 652:1436–1450, December 2006

    2006

  76. [85]

    Coughlin, Duncan A

    Chaitanya Afle, Suman Kumar Kundu, Jenna Cammerino, Eric R. Coughlin, Duncan A. Brown, David Vartanyan, and Adam Burrows. Measuring the properties of f -mode oscillations of a protoneutron star by third-generation gravitational-wave detectors. Phys. Rev. D, 107(12):123005, June 2023

    2023

  77. [86]

    Determination of properties of protoneutron stars toward black hole formation via gravitational wave observations

    Hajime Sotani and Kohsuke Sumiyoshi. Determination of properties of protoneutron stars toward black hole formation via gravitational wave observations. Phys. Rev. D, 100(8):083008, October 2019

    2019

  78. [87]

    Understanding supernova gravitational waves with protoneutron star asteroseismology

    Hajime Sotani. Understanding supernova gravitational waves with protoneutron star asteroseismology. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 43(9):093001, May 2026

    2026

  79. [88]

    Universal relation for supernova gravitational waves

    Hajime Sotani, Tomoya Takiwaki, and Hajime Togashi. Universal relation for supernova gravitational waves. Phys. Rev. D, 104:123009, Dec 2021

    2021

  80. [89]

    Accuracy of the relativistic Cowling approximation in protoneutron star asteroseismology

    Hajime Sotani and Tomoya Takiwaki. Accuracy of the relativistic Cowling approximation in protoneutron star asteroseismology. Phys. Rev. D, 102(6):063025, September 2020

    2020

  81. [90]

    Sotani, T

    H. Sotani, T. Kuroda, T. Takiwaki, and K. Kotake. Probing mass-radius relation of protoneutron stars from gravitational-wave asteroseismology. Phys. Rev. D, 96(6):063005, September 2017. 19 IOP PublishingCQG(2026)

    2026

  82. [91]

    Niels-Uwe F. Bastian. Phenomenological quark-hadron equations of state with first-order phase transitions for astrophysical applications. Phys. Rev. D, 103(2):023001, January 2021

    2021

  83. [92]

    Impact of Neutrino Opacities on Core-collapse Supernova Simulations

    Kei Kotake, Tomoya Takiwaki, Tobias Fischer, Ko Nakamura, and Gabriel Mart´ ınez-Pinedo. Impact of Neutrino Opacities on Core-collapse Supernova Simulations. Astrophys. J., 853(2):170, Feb 2018

    2018

  84. [93]

    Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational-wave experiments

    Demetrios Christodoulou. Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational-wave experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett., 67:1486–1489, Sep 1991

    1991

  85. [94]

    Shapiro, and Branson C

    Masaru Shibata, Yuk Tung Liu, Stuart L. Shapiro, and Branson C. Stephens. Magnetorotational collapse of massive stellar cores to neutron stars: Simulations in full general relativity. Phys. Rev. D, 74(10):104026, November 2006

    2006

  86. [95]

    Obergaulinger, M

    M. Obergaulinger, M. A. Aloy, and E. M¨ uller. Axisymmetric simulations of magneto-rotational core collapse: dynamics and gravitational wave signal. Astron. Astrophys., 450(3):1107–1134, May 2006

    2006

  87. [96]

    Scheidegger, R

    S. Scheidegger, R. K¨ appeli, S. C. Whitehouse, T. Fischer, and M. Liebend¨ orfer. The influence of model parameters on the prediction of gravitational wave signals from stellar core collapse. Astron. Astrophys., 514:A51, May 2010

    2010

  88. [97]

    Circular polarization of gravitational waves from magnetorotational supernovae

    Shota Shibagaki, Tomoya Takiwaki, Kei Kotake, Takami Kuroda, and Tobias Fischer. Circular polarization of gravitational waves from magnetorotational supernovae. Astron. Astrophys., 711:L6, July 2026

    2026

  89. [98]

    Schnauck, Swapnil Shankar, Philipp M¨ osta, Roland Haas, and Erik Schnetter

    Sophia C. Schnauck, Swapnil Shankar, Philipp M¨ osta, Roland Haas, and Erik Schnetter. Gravitational waves from magnetorotational core-collapse supernovae using 3D GRMHD simulations: effect of rotation and magnetic fields. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 546(2):stag056, February 2026

    2026

  90. [99]

    Gravitational Waves from Neutrino Emission Asymmetries in Core-collapse Supernovae

    David Vartanyan and Adam Burrows. Gravitational Waves from Neutrino Emission Asymmetries in Core-collapse Supernovae. Astrophys. J., 901(2):108, October 2020

    2020

  91. [100]

    The neutrino gravitational memory from a core collapse supernova: phenomenology and physics potential

    Mainak Mukhopadhyay, Carlos Cardona, and Cecilia Lunardini. The neutrino gravitational memory from a core collapse supernova: phenomenology and physics potential. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2105.05862, May 2021

    2021 arXiv

  92. [101]

    Milli-to-Deci-Hertz Detection Prospects for Gravitational Waves from Core-Collapse Supernovae

    Kiranjyot Gill. Milli-to-Deci-Hertz Detection Prospects for Gravitational Waves from Core-Collapse Supernovae. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2405.13211, May 2024

    2024 arXiv

  93. [102]

    Richardson, Haakon Andresen, Anthony Mezzacappa, Michele Zanolin, Michael G

    Colter J. Richardson, Haakon Andresen, Anthony Mezzacappa, Michele Zanolin, Michael G. Benjamin, Pedro Marronetti, Eric J. Lentz, and Marek J. Szczepa´ nczyk. Detecting Gravitational Wave Memory in the Next Galactic Core-Collapse Supernova. Phys. Rev. Lett., 133(23):231401, De...

    2024

  94. [103]

    Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO

    Seiji Kawamura, Masaki Ando, Naoki Seto, Shuichi Sato, Mitsuru Musha, Isao Kawano, Jun’ichi Yokoyama, Takahiro Tanaka, Kunihito Ioka, Tomotada Akutsu, Takeshi Takashima, Kazuhiro Agatsuma, Akito Araya, Naoki Aritomi, Hideki Asada, Takeshi Chiba, Satoshi Eguchi, Motohiro Enoki,...

    2026

  95. [104]

    Numerical relativity simulations of black hole and relativistic jet formation

    Takami Kuroda and Masaru Shibata. Numerical relativity simulations of black hole and relativistic jet formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 533(1):L107–L112, September 2024

    2024

  96. [105]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler. Gravitation. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Co., 1973

    1973

  97. [106]

    Moenchmeyer, G

    R. Moenchmeyer, G. Schaefer, E. Mueller, and R. E. Kates. Gravitational waves from the collapse of rotating stellar cores. Astron. Astrophys., 246:417–440, June 1991

    1991

  98. [107]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, and et al. Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA. Living Reviews in Relat...

    2018

  99. [108]

    Ballmer, Sylvia Biscoveanu, Ssohrab Borhanian, Duncan A

    Matthew Evans, Rana X Adhikari, Chaitanya Afle, Stefan W. Ballmer, Sylvia Biscoveanu, Ssohrab Borhanian, Duncan A. Brown, Yanbei Chen, Robert Eisenstein, Alexandra Gruson, Anuradha Gupta, Evan D. Hall, Rachael Huxford, Brittany Kamai, Rahul Kashyap, Jeff S. Kissel, Kevin Kuns,...

    2021 arXiv

  100. [109]

    S. Hild, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, P. Amaro-Seoane, N. Andersson, K. Arun, F. Barone, B. Barr, M. Barsuglia, M. Beker, N. Beveridge, S. Birindelli, S. Bose, L. Bosi, S. Braccini, C. Bradaschia, T. Bulik, E. Calloni, G. Cella, E. Chassande Mottin, S. Chelkowski, A. Chincarini,...

    2011

  101. [110]

    Jade Powell, Alberto Iess, Miquel Llorens-Monteagudo, Martin Obergaulinger, Bernhard M¨ uller, Alejandro Torres-Forn´ e, Elena Cuoco, and Jos´ e A. Font. Determining the core-collapse supernova explosion mechanism with current and future gravitational-wave observatories. Phys....

    2024

  102. [111]

    Ackley, V

    K. Ackley, V. B. Adya, P. Agrawal, P. Altin, G. Ashton, M. Bailes, E. Baltinas, A. Barbuio, D. Beniwal, C. Blair, D. Blair, G. N. Bolingbroke, V. Bossilkov, S. Shachar Boublil, D. D. Brown, B. J. Burridge, J. Calderon Bustillo, J. Cameron, H. Tuong Cao, J. B. Carlin, S. Chang,...

    2026

  103. [112]

    Clifford M. Will. The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment. Living Reviews in Relativity, 17(1):4, December 2014

    2014

  104. [113]

    Probes and Tests of Strong-Field Gravity with Observations in the Electromagnetic Spectrum

    Dimitrios Psaltis. Probes and Tests of Strong-Field Gravity with Observations in the Electromagnetic Spectrum. Living Reviews in Relativity, 11(1):9, November 2008

    2008

  105. [114]

    Stein, Norbert Wex, Kent Yagi, Tessa Baker, C

    Emanuele Berti, Enrico Barausse, Vitor Cardoso, Leonardo Gualtieri, Paolo Pani, Ulrich Sperhake, Leo C. Stein, Norbert Wex, Kent Yagi, Tessa Baker, C. P. Burgess, Fl´ avio S. Coelho, Daniela Doneva, Antonio De Felice, Pedro G. Ferreira, Paulo C. C. Freire, James Healy, Carlos ...

    2015

  106. [115]

    Perlmutter, G

    S. Perlmutter, G. Aldering, G. Goldhaber, R. A. Knop, P. Nugent, P. G. Castro, S. Deustua, S. Fabbro, A. Goobar, D. E. Groom, I. M. Hook, A. G. Kim, M. Y. Kim, J. C. Lee, N. J. Nunes, R. Pain, C. R. Pennypacker, R. Quimby, C. Lidman, R. S. Ellis, M. Irwin, R. G. McMahon, P. Ru...

    1999

  107. [116]

    Komatsu, K

    E. Komatsu, K. M. Smith, J. Dunkley, C. L. Bennett, B. Gold, G. Hinshaw, N. Jarosik, D. Larson, M. R. Nolta, L. Page, D. N. Spergel, M. Halpern, R. S. Hill, A. Kogut, M. Limon, S. S. Meyer, N. Odegard, G. S. Tucker, J. L. Weiland, E. Wollack, and E. L. Wright. Seven-year Wilki...

    2011

  108. [117]

    T. M. C. Abbott, S. Allam, P. Andersen, C. Angus, J. Asorey, A. Avelino, S. Avila, B. A. Bassett, K. Bechtol, G. M. Bernstein, E. Bertin, D. Brooks, D. Brout, P. Brown, D. L. Burke, J. Calcino, A. Carnero Rosell, D. Carollo, M. Carrasco Kind, J. Carretero, R. Casas, F. J. Cast...

    2026

  109. [118]

    Aghanim, Y

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, R. Battye, K. Benabed, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boula...

    2018

  110. [119]

    Nonperturbative strong-field effects in tensor-scalar theories of gravitation

    Thibault Damour and Gilles Esposito-Farese. Nonperturbative strong-field effects in tensor-scalar theories of gravitation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 70(15):2220–2223, April 1993

    1993

  111. [120]

    Ramazanoˇ glu and Frans Pretorius

    Fethi M. Ramazanoˇ glu and Frans Pretorius. Spontaneous scalarization with massive fields. Phys. Rev. D, 93(6):064005, March 2016

    2016

  112. [121]

    Ib´ a˜ nez

    J´ erˆ ome Novak and Jos´ e M. Ib´ a˜ nez. Gravitational Waves from the Collapse and Bounce of a Stellar Core in Tensor-Scalar Gravity. Astrophys. J., 533(1):392–405, April 2000

    2000

  113. [122]

    Davide Gerosa, Ulrich Sperhake, and Christian D. Ott. Numerical simulations of stellar collapse in scalar-tensor theories of gravity. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 33(13):135002, July 2016

    2016

  114. [123]

    Moore, Michalis Agathos, Davide Gerosa, and Christian D

    Roxana Rosca-Mead, Ulrich Sperhake, Christopher J. Moore, Michalis Agathos, Davide Gerosa, and Christian D. Ott. Core collapse in massive scalar-tensor gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 102(4):044010, August 2020

    2020

  115. [124]

    Coalescence of binary neutron stars in a scalar-tensor theory of gravity

    Masaru Shibata, Keisuke Taniguchi, Hirotada Okawa, and Alessandra Buonanno. Coalescence of binary neutron stars in a scalar-tensor theory of gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 89(8):084005, April 2014. 23

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.