Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 54 references

Spectral-Spatial Synergistic Guided Network for Hyperspectral Salient Object Detection

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that hyperspectral saliency detection improves when spectral derivatives replace raw reflectance as the material signature, and supports this with a network that sets new benchmark records at lower cost.

desk verdict A sensible, well-ablated architecture with potentially strong gains, but the SOTA claim needs a controlled multi-seed comparison before it's credible. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21032 v1 pith:AID6VA6I submitted 2026-07-23 cs.CV

Yanyan Peng , Tingfa Xu , Yao Xiao , Peifu Liu , Shuyan Bai , Fengxiang Xu , Jianan Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords hyperspectralsalientobjectdetectionspectralderivativeilluminationrobustnessspectral-spatialfusionattentionmechanismsaliencypriormulti-scalerefinementlightweightnetwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Hyperspectral salient object detection fails when models treat all spectral changes as meaningful, because illumination and other external factors cause incidental spectral variation. To fix this, the authors propose S3GNet, which replaces raw reflectance with first-order spectral derivatives as a stable signature of intrinsic material properties, and combines this spectral prior with spatial structure through attention-based fusion and progressive refinement. The result is a lightweight network that sets a new state of the art on HSOD-BIT-V2 and HS-SOD, improving Fβ by 10.8% over Hyper-HRNet while using only 33% of its parameters. A sympathetic reader would care because the work suggests a principled way to make spectral representations robust to lighting, which matters for real-world hyperspectral applications.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the first-order spectral derivative map G = {g_i}, where g_i = (v_{i+1} - v_i)/Δλ, normalized to a wavelength-invariant slope. This map replaces raw reflectance as the input to the Spectral Structure-Aware Module (SSAM), which partitions the image into superpixels, averages derivative features within each region, and scores each region's saliency as the area-weighted sum of Euclidean distances to all other regions. That spectral saliency prior S_m enters the network alongside a pseudo-color spatial stream; the Stream-Aware Attention Module (SAAM) fuses the streams through Weighted Correlation Attention (a 2x2 correlation matrix between streams mapped by an MLP t

What would settle it

A controlled illumination experiment—for example, taking hyperspectral images of the same scenes under different light intensities or with shadows, and checking whether the spectral saliency prior S_m stays stable—would directly test the core premise. If the prior changes substantially with lighting, the reported gains would not transfer to conditions with strong illumination gradients. Alternatively, an ablation that replaces first-order derivatives with normalized reflectance or second-order derivatives on a shadowed test set would show whether the derivative is the decisive factor.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

S3GNet's central claim is that a parameter-free spectral saliency prior computed from first-order spectral derivatives—rather than from raw reflectance—can serve as a reliable, illumination-robust input for hyperspectral saliency detection. The authors show that this prior, generated by the Spectral Structure-Aware Module (SSAM) through superpixel clustering and contrast weighting, combined with a dual-stream encoder that fuses spectral and spatial features via the Stream-Aware Attention Module (SAAM) and a Progressive Gated Refinement Decoder (PGRD), produces the best reported accuracy and efficiency on HSOD-BIT-V2 and HS-SOD benchmarks. On HSOD-BIT-V2, the method outperforms the previous l

Load-bearing premise

The method's gains rely on the untested premise that first-order spectral derivatives isolate intrinsic material properties from illumination effects; the paper provides no controlled lighting experiment, and the superpixel parameters that control the spectral prior are left unspecified.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If spectral derivatives indeed provide illumination-robust material signatures, HSOD models can be made simpler and faster without sacrificing accuracy, enabling real-time deployment (137 FPS reported).
  • The same spectral-derivative prior could improve other hyperspectral tasks that suffer from lighting variation, such as material classification or change detection, by replacing raw reflectance inputs.
  • The cross-stream attention mechanism, which adaptively weights spectral and spatial streams based on their statistical correlation, suggests a general recipe for fusing complementary modalities in multi-modal saliency detection, and the paper's RGB-T results support this.
  • The progressive gated decoder offers a reusable component for boundary-preserving saliency prediction in other modalities.
  • The result on HS-SOD (smaller dataset) indicates the method transfers to different spectral ranges (380-780 nm vs 400-1000 nm), pointing to cross-sensor robustness.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the paper's logic, an alternative explanation for the improvement is that derivatives act as a strong hand-crafted feature that discards low-frequency baseline shifts; a controlled comparison against other illumination-invariant features (e.g., continuum removal or normalized reflectance) would clarify whether derivatives are uniquely responsible.
  • Since the spectral saliency prior is computed with an unspecified SLIC granularity (superpixel count N and spatial weight m are never reported), the method's sensitivity to these hyperparameters is unknown; ablation over N and m could reveal whether the prior's quality depends on them.
  • The failure cases on hollow and fine-structured objects suggest the region-level prior may over-smooth thin structures; a pixel-level or adaptive-resolution variant of SSAM might extend the method to those cases, so the paper's own limitation points to a concrete next step.
  • The RGB-T generalization, though promising, is demonstrated without SSAM, meaning the contribution of the spectral branch in that setting is untested; ablating the spectral prior on RGB-T would clarify whether the gains there come from the attention/decoder alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes S3GNet, a dual-stream hyperspectral salient object detection network. It combines a parameter-free Spectral Structure-Aware Module (SSAM) that computes first-order spectral derivatives and superpixel regional contrast to produce a spectral saliency prior; a band-selection strategy (ONR) to form pseudo-color spatial features; a Stream-Aware Attention Module (SAAM) with Weighted Correlation Attention and Coupled Enhancement Attention for spectral-spatial fusion; and a Progressive Gated Refinement Decoder (PGRD) for multi-scale refinement. Experiments on HSOD-BIT-V2, HS-SOD, and RGB-T datasets report state-of-the-art results, including an Fβ gain of 0.108 over Hyper-HRNet on HSOD-BIT-V2 with 33.0% of the parameters and 48.0% of the FLOPs. The paper also provides component ablations and visualizations.

Significance. If the reported results are robust, the paper makes a useful contribution: it demonstrates a lightweight architecture with a parameter-free spectral prior, a cross-stream attention fusion mechanism, and a gated refinement decoder, and it reports strong efficiency-accuracy trade-offs. The authors provide code and include detailed ablations, which are commendable. However, the significance is conditional because the central state-of-the-art claim rests on single-run comparisons on small test sets and on several unreported hyperparameters. The core ideas are plausible and the empirical direction is sensible, but the evidence as presented does not yet support the strength of the claims.

major comments (5)
  1. [§IV-B, Table I; §IV-D, Tables III/V/VIII/IX] The state-of-the-art claim is not supported by adequate statistical evidence. All results appear to come from a single training run with no error bars, no multiple-seed experiments, and no significance testing. On HSOD-BIT-V2, the 94-image test split is moderate, but the HS-SOD test set has only 12 images (Table II). The manuscript also does not describe a validation split used for checkpoint selection or hyperparameter tuning; Table III alone shows Fβ varying from 0.523 to 0.699 across configurations. Since ablation and design choices (Tables V, VIII, IX) are evaluated on the test set, the reported configuration may be an optimistic selection. Please report mean±std over at least 3–5 seeds, state the validation protocol, and perform paired significance tests where feasible.
  2. [§IV-A, §IV-B] The comparison protocol for baselines is not described. It is unclear whether Hyper-HRNet, SMN, DMSSN, and the RGB methods were retrained under the same training/test split, input resolution, data augmentation, and evaluation code, or whether the numbers are quoted from prior publications. Uncontrolled training conditions can easily produce several points of Fβ difference. Please either retrain all baselines under a common protocol or clearly state the source of each baseline number and justify comparability.
  3. [§III-A, §III-B; Eq. (20)] Several hyperparameters that likely affect the reported performance are unreported: the number of superpixels N and compactness factor m in SLIC, the number of bands selected by ONR, and any weighting coefficients in the hybrid loss of Eq. (20). These are free parameters and should be specified or shown to have little influence. In addition, Eq. (3) defines the distance with a spatial weight of 1/m, which is the opposite of the standard SLIC compactness convention (where larger m increases spatial regularization); this inconsistency should be fixed and the adopted value of m reported.
  4. [§III-A] The paper's core motivation—that first-order spectral derivatives are robust to illumination variations and capture intrinsic material properties—is asserted but never directly tested. Eq. (2) is a finite difference: it removes additive offsets but not multiplicative illumination scaling or shadow-induced gains. A controlled experiment with synthetic illumination changes (e.g., multiplicative scaling, gradient illumination, cast shadows) on HSOD-BIT-V2/HS-SOD would be needed to justify the claim. Without this, the risk remains that SSAM injects a misleading prior in scenes with strong illumination gradients, and the reported gains would not transfer.
  5. [§IV-C, Table II] On HS-SOD, the quantitative evidence is weak. The dataset has only 12 test images, and the reported improvements over Hyper-HRNet are small in absolute terms (e.g., Eξ +0.021). Table II also omits Fβ, the metric used to headline the HSOD-BIT-V2 result. With n=12, the claim of 'stable performance improvement' is not justified without per-image results or statistical testing. Please include Fβ, report per-image or paired statistics, and temper the claim accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§IV-E] The text says 'follow the setup of Tu et al.' but the cited reference [53] is Cong et al. Please correct this citation.
  2. [Abstract / §IV-B.2] The phrase 'increases Fβ by 10.8%' is ambiguous: it is an absolute increase of 0.108 in Fβ (from 0.591 to 0.699), which is 18.3% relative. State this as percentage points or relative change to avoid confusion.
  3. [Fig. 2 and §III-C] Some notation in the figure (e.g., GConv, AVP, C×H×W reshaping) is not fully defined in the text. Please add a short legend or caption explanation for all abbreviations.
  4. [§III-A, Eq. (6)] The definition of ω_j normalizes over k≠i, but the textual description 'weighted average of the contrast' is correct. It may help to explicitly state that the weights sum to one over j≠i.
  5. [§IV-E, Table VII] The adaptation of S3GNet to RGB-T is not described. It is unclear which stream replaces the spectral stream, and why SSAM is omitted. Please provide a short architectural description of the RGB-T variant.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: S3GNet is an empirical architecture paper whose modules are well-defined transformations of the input and whose final predictions are trained against ground truth; benchmark comparisons use fixed external test splits.

full rationale

This paper does not present a formal derivation chain that could reduce to its own inputs. The Spectral Structure-Aware Module computes spectral derivatives (Eq. 2), superpixel regional means (Eq. 4), pairwise contrasts (Eq. 5), and a weighted saliency score (Eq. 6) directly from the input hyperspectral image; no ground-truth information or target metric is used in computing this prior. The Stream-Aware Attention Module and Progressive Gated Refinement Decoder are learned feature-fusion components whose parameters are optimized by the hybrid BCE+IoU loss in Eq. 20 against ground-truth saliency maps. This is standard supervised learning, not a self-referential prediction. The self-citations present—notably the HSOD-BIT-V2 dataset and Hyper-HRNet baseline [13]—are used as a benchmark and a comparison method, respectively, not as load-bearing justifications for the method's correctness; the test split is fixed and the comparison is an empirical measurement. The untested motivation that first-order derivatives are robust to illumination is a scientific assumption, not a circular step: its validity is independent of whether the network's predictions are derived from its inputs. The paper even reports failure cases and limitations, further indicating that the claims are not being forced by construction. Therefore no claim reduces by definition or by self-citation to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes no new physical entities and makes no parameter-free derivation. Its central claim rests on unreported hyperparameters (superpixel count, compactness, band count) and on a domain assumption that first-order spectral derivatives provide illumination-robust material descriptors.

free parameters (5)
  • Number of superpixels N in SLIC
    Eqs. (3)-(6) define superpixel-based regional saliency; N controls granularity of spectral prior and is never specified in the paper.
  • SLIC spatial weighting factor m
    Appears in Eq. (3) as the compactness trade-off; value not reported despite being a key hyperparameter.
  • Number of bands selected by ONR
    Band selection is stated to 'screen out the key bands' (Section III-B) but the selected band count is not given; it determines the pseudo-color spatial stream.
  • Loss weights for BCE and IoU terms
    Eq. (20) sums three stages of BCE+IoU with equal weighting shown, but any additional weighting/balancing is not described; if unequal weights were used, they are omitted.
  • Superpixel update iterations / SLIC convergence parameters
    Improved CUDA-accelerated SLIC is referenced but iteration count and convergence criteria are not provided.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption First-order spectral derivatives are approximately invariant to illumination-dependent additive/multiplicative shading across the HSI bands (Eq. 2).
    Stated in Section III-A: 'the first-order derivative emphasizes the monotonic absorption trend and slope change... closely related to the inherent properties of the material.' No controlled illumination experiment supports this; it's a standard remote-sensing heuristic.
  • domain assumption Pixels within SLIC superpixels share approximately uniform spectral-derivative characteristics, so regional averaging (Eq. 4) preserves salient structure.
    SSAM's regional hierarchy assumes superpixels are semantically coherent; failure to align with object boundaries corrupts the spectral prior.
  • domain assumption The ONR band selection (cited [35]) returns the most discriminative bands for spatial saliency, and pseudo-color mapping preserves edge/texture cues.
    Section III-B relies on ONR to screen bands; no analysis of selected bands or robustness to band count is provided.
  • domain assumption Ground-truth saliency maps in HS-SOD and HSOD-BIT-V2 are reliable and the 12-image HS-SOD test split is representative.
    Section IV-C uses 12 test images; with such a small sample, results are sensitive to individual images.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectral-Spatial Synergistic Guided Network for Hyperspectral Salient Object Detection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AID6VA6I

@misc{pith2026260721032,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectral-Spatial Synergistic Guided Network for Hyperspectral Salient Object Detection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AID6VA6I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21032}
}
read the original abstract

Hyperspectral salient object detection aims to identify visually salient regions from hyperspectral images. Existing methods often fail because they fundamentally misunderstand the data, confusing incidental spectral variations caused by external factors such as illumination with essential spectral differences caused by the intrinsic material properties of the object. This leads to fragile representations and noisy predictions. To this end, we propose a lightweight and efficient Spectral-Spatial Synergistic Guided Network (S3GNet), with structure perception as the core, to build a closed-loop information flow around spectrum robust modeling, cross-stream co-perception and multi-scale refinement decoding. S3GNet introduces a parameter-free Spectral Structure-Aware Module that leverages spectral derivatives and regional hierarchical modeling to extract intrinsic features of robustness against illumination variations. Our Stream-Aware Attention Module achieves effective spectral-spatial collaboration through inter-stream global interaction and intra-stream spatial guidance. Furthermore, a Progressive Gated Refinement Decoder ensures precise object boundaries and detail recovery by optimally integrating multi-scale features. Experimental results show that S3GNet achieves superior performance in both computational efficiency and detection accuracy compared to existing methods.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21032 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Existing methods (a) are difficult to effectively distinguish between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) presents the overall architecture of the proposed S3GNet. It begins by leveraging (b) SSAM to extract spectral derivative information and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Qualitative results on HSOD-BIT-V2 dataset. S3GNet has the best detection performance, especially in challenging scenarios. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spectral saliency map visual of SSAM output. The module effectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Visualization of feature distribution via t-SNE. Red indicates salient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Results with and without spectral features. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Qualitative results on RGB-T SOD datasets. S3GNet exhibits excellent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Visualization results of S3GNet and other advanced methods in some [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Cascaded partial decoder for fast and accurate salient object detection,

    Z. Wu, L. Su, and Q. Huang, “Cascaded partial decoder for fast and accurate salient object detection,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019, pp. 3907– 3916

    2019

  2. [2]

    Multispectral fusion transformer network for rgb-thermal urban scene semantic seg- mentation,

    H. Zhou, C. Tian, Z. Zhang, Q. Huo, Y . Xie, and Z. Li, “Multispectral fusion transformer network for rgb-thermal urban scene semantic seg- mentation,”IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 19, pp. 1–5, 2022

    2022

  3. [3]

    Position- aware relation learning for rgb-thermal salient object detection,

    H. Zhou, C. Tian, Z. Zhang, C. Li, Y . Ding, Y . Xie, and Z. Li, “Position- aware relation learning for rgb-thermal salient object detection,”IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 32, pp. 2593–2607, 2023

    2023

  4. [4]

    Lsnet: Lightweight spatial boosting network for detecting salient objects in rgb-thermal images,

    W. Zhou, Y . Zhu, J. Lei, R. Yang, and L. Yu, “Lsnet: Lightweight spatial boosting network for detecting salient objects in rgb-thermal images,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 32, pp. 1329–1340, 2023

    2023

  5. [5]

    Alignment-free rgbt salient object detection: Semantics-guided asymmetric correlation network and a unified benchmark,

    K. Wang, D. Lin, C. Li, Z. Tu, and B. Luo, “Alignment-free rgbt salient object detection: Semantics-guided asymmetric correlation network and a unified benchmark,”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2024

    2024

  6. [6]

    Spectrum-driven mixed-frequency network for hyperspectral salient object detection,

    P. Liu, T. Xu, H. Chen, S. Zhou, H. Qin, and J. Li, “Spectrum-driven mixed-frequency network for hyperspectral salient object detection,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 26, pp. 5296–5310, 2023

    2023

  7. [7]

    Spectral-wise implicit neural representation for hyperspectral image reconstruction,

    H. Chen, W. Zhao, T. Xu, G. Shi, S. Zhou, P. Liu, and J. Li, “Spectral-wise implicit neural representation for hyperspectral image reconstruction,”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 3714–3727, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    Hyperspectral remote sensing images salient object detection: The first benchmark dataset and baseline,

    P. Liu, H. Bai, T. Xu, J. Wang, H. Chen, and J. Li, “Hyperspectral remote sensing images salient object detection: The first benchmark dataset and baseline,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 63, pp. 1–14, 2025

    2025

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    A lightweight fusion strategy with enhanced inter-layer feature correlation for small object detection,

    Y . Xiao, T. Xu, X. Yu, Y . Fang, and J. Li, “A lightweight fusion strategy with enhanced inter-layer feature correlation for small object detection,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Perceptive self-supervised learning network for noisy image watermark removal,

    C. Tian, M. Zheng, B. Li, Y . Zhang, S. Zhang, and D. Zhang, “Perceptive self-supervised learning network for noisy image watermark removal,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 7069–7079, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Spectrum-oriented point-supervised saliency detector for hyperspectral images,

    P. Liu, T. Xu, G. Shi, J. Xu, H. Chen, and J. Li, “Spectrum-oriented point-supervised saliency detector for hyperspectral images,”IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 74, pp. 1–15, 2025

    2025

  4. [12]

    Salient object detection on hyperspectral images in wireless network using cnn and saliency optimization,

    C. Huang, T. Xu, Y . Zhang, C. Pan, J. Hao, and X. Li, “Salient object detection on hyperspectral images in wireless network using cnn and saliency optimization,”Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 112, p. 102369, 2021

    2021

  5. [13]

    Hsod-bit-v2: A challenging benchmark for hyperspectral salient object detection,

    Y . Qiu, S. Bai, T. Xu, P. Liu, H. Qin, and J. Li, “Hsod-bit-v2: A challenging benchmark for hyperspectral salient object detection,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2025, pp. 6630–6638

    2025

  6. [14]

    Dmssn: Distilled mixed spectral–spatial network for hyperspectral salient object detection,

    H. Qin, T. Xu, P. Liu, J. Xu, and J. Li, “Dmssn: Distilled mixed spectral–spatial network for hyperspectral salient object detection,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 62, pp. 1–18, 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Salient object detection on hyperspectral images using features learned from unsupervised segmentation task,

    N. ˙Imamo˘glu, G. Ding, Y . Fang, A. Kanezaki, T. Kouyama, and R. Nakamura, “Salient object detection on hyperspectral images using features learned from unsupervised segmentation task,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech Signal Process., 2019, pp. 2192–2196

    2019

  8. [16]

    Salient object detection: A discriminative regional feature integration approach,

    H. Jiang, J. Wang, Z. Yuan, Y . Wu, N. Zheng, and S. Li, “Salient object detection: A discriminative regional feature integration approach,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2013, pp. 2083–2090. 11

    2013

  9. [17]

    A simple method for detecting salient regions,

    P. L. Rosin, “A simple method for detecting salient regions,”Pattern recognition, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 2363–2371, 2009

    2009

  10. [18]

    Frequency-tuned salient region detection,

    R. Achanta, S. Hemami, F. Estrada, and S. Susstrunk, “Frequency-tuned salient region detection,” in2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. IEEE, 2009, pp. 1597–1604

    2009

  11. [19]

    Frequency-aware feature aggregation network with dual-task consistency for rgb-t salient object detection,

    H. Zhou, C. Tian, Z. Zhang, C. Li, Y . Xie, and Z. Li, “Frequency-aware feature aggregation network with dual-task consistency for rgb-t salient object detection,”Pattern Recognition, vol. 146, p. 110043, 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    A survey on deep learning fundamentals,

    C. Tian, T. Cheng, Z. Peng, W. Zuo, Y . Tian, Q. Zhang, F.-Y . Wang, and D. Zhang, “A survey on deep learning fundamentals,”Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 58, no. 12, p. 381, 2025

    2025

  13. [21]

    A tree- guided cnn for image super-resolution,

    C. Tian, M. Song, X. Fan, X. Zheng, B. Zhang, and D. Zhang, “A tree- guided cnn for image super-resolution,”IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2025

    2025

  14. [22]

    Multi-scale interactive network for salient object detection,

    Y . Pang, X. Zhao, L. Zhang, and H. Lu, “Multi-scale interactive network for salient object detection,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2020, pp. 9413–9422

    2020

  15. [23]

    R2net: Residual refinement network for salient object detection,

    J. Zhang, Q. Liang, Q. Guo, J. Yang, Q. Zhang, and Y . Shi, “R2net: Residual refinement network for salient object detection,”Image and Vision Computing, vol. 120, p. 104423, 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    Catnet: A cascaded and aggregated transformer network for rgb-d salient object detection,

    F. Sun, P. Ren, B. Yin, F. Wang, and H. Li, “Catnet: A cascaded and aggregated transformer network for rgb-d salient object detection,”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 26, pp. 2249–2262, 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    A model of saliency-based visual at- tention for rapid scene analysis,

    L. Itti, C. Koch, and E. Niebur, “A model of saliency-based visual at- tention for rapid scene analysis,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1254–1259, 1998

    1998

  18. [26]

    Salient object detection in hyperspectral imagery,

    J. Liang, J. Zhou, X. Bai, and Y . Qian, “Salient object detection in hyperspectral imagery,” in2013 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 2013, pp. 2393–2397

    2013

  19. [27]

    Saliency for spectral image analysis,

    S. Le Moan, A. Mansouri, J. Y . Hardeberg, and Y . V oisin, “Saliency for spectral image analysis,”IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 2472–2479, 2013

    2013

  20. [28]

    Progressive attention guided recurrent network for salient object detection,

    X. Zhang, T. Wang, J. Qi, H. Lu, and G. Wang, “Progressive attention guided recurrent network for salient object detection,” inProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018, pp. 714–722

    2018

  21. [29]

    Visual saliency transformer,

    N. Liu, N. Zhang, K. Wan, L. Shao, and J. Han, “Visual saliency transformer,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021, pp. 4722–4732

    2021

  22. [30]

    Heterogeneous window transformer for image denoising,

    C. Tian, M. Zheng, C.-W. Lin, Z. Li, and D. Zhang, “Heterogeneous window transformer for image denoising,”IEEE Transactions on Sys- tems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    Bi-directional progressive guidance network for rgb-d salient object detection,

    Y . Yang, Q. Qin, Y . Luo, Y . Liu, Q. Zhang, and J. Han, “Bi-directional progressive guidance network for rgb-d salient object detection,”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 5346–5360, 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    Derivative analysis of hyperspectral data,

    F. Tsai and W. Philpot, “Derivative analysis of hyperspectral data,” Remote sensing of environment, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 41–51, 1998

    1998

  25. [33]

    Wavelets for computationally efficient hy- perspectral derivative analysis,

    L. M. Bruce and J. Li, “Wavelets for computationally efficient hy- perspectral derivative analysis,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1540–1546, 2001

    2001

  26. [34]

    Slic superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods,

    R. Achanta, A. Shaji, K. Smith, A. Lucchi, P. Fua, and S. S ¨usstrunk, “Slic superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods,”IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 2274–2282, 2012

    2012

  27. [35]

    Hyperspectral band selection via optimal neighborhood reconstruction,

    Q. Wang, F. Zhang, and X. Li, “Hyperspectral band selection via optimal neighborhood reconstruction,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 8465–8476, 2020

    2020

  28. [36]

    Coordinate attention for efficient mobile network design,

    Q. Hou, D. Zhou, and J. Feng, “Coordinate attention for efficient mobile network design,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2021, pp. 13 713–13 722

    2021

  29. [37]

    Basnet: Boundary-aware salient object detection,

    X. Qin, Z. Zhang, C. Huang, C. Gao, M. Dehghan, and M. Jagersand, “Basnet: Boundary-aware salient object detection,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019, pp. 7479–7489

    2019

  30. [38]

    U2-net: Going deeper with nested u-structure for salient object detection,

    X. Qin, Z. Zhang, C. Huang, M. Dehghan, O. R. Zaiane, and M. Jager- sand, “U2-net: Going deeper with nested u-structure for salient object detection,”Pattern recognition, vol. 106, p. 107404, 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    Salient object detection via integrity learning,

    M. Zhuge, D.-P. Fan, N. Liu, D. Zhang, D. Xu, and L. Shao, “Salient object detection via integrity learning,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 3738–3752, 2022

    2022

  32. [40]

    Multi-scale and detail-enhanced segment anything model for salient object detection,

    S. Gao, P. Zhang, T. Yan, and H. Lu, “Multi-scale and detail-enhanced segment anything model for salient object detection,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04326

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Towards a complete and detail-preserved salient object detection,

    Y . K. Yun and W. Lin, “Towards a complete and detail-preserved salient object detection,”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 26, pp. 4667– 4680, 2024

    2024

  34. [42]

    Admnet: Attention-guided densely multi-scale network for lightweight salient object detection,

    X. Zhou, K. Shen, and Z. Liu, “Admnet: Attention-guided densely multi-scale network for lightweight salient object detection,”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 26, pp. 10 828–10 841, 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    Rapid salient object detection with difference convo- lutional neural networks,

    Z. Su, L. Liu, M. M ¨uller, J. Zhang, D. Wofk, M.-M. Cheng, and M. Pietik ¨ainen, “Rapid salient object detection with difference convo- lutional neural networks,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 9061–9077, 2025

    2025

  36. [44]

    Generative transformer for accurate and reliable salient object detection,

    Y . Mao, J. Zhang, Z. Wan, X. Tian, A. Li, Y . Lv, and Y . Dai, “Generative transformer for accurate and reliable salient object detection,”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 1041–1054, 2025

    2025

  37. [45]

    Hyperspectral image dataset for benchmarking on salient object detection,

    N. Imamoglu, Y . Oishi, X. Zhang, G. Ding, Y . Fang, T. Kouyama, and R. Nakamura, “Hyperspectral image dataset for benchmarking on salient object detection,” in2018 Tenth international conference on quality of multimedia experience (qoMEX). IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–3

    2018

  38. [46]

    Delving into cal- ibrated depth for accurate rgb-d salient object detection,

    J. Li, W. Ji, M. Zhang, Y . Piao, H. Lu, and L. Cheng, “Delving into cal- ibrated depth for accurate rgb-d salient object detection,”International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. 855–876, 2023

    2023

  39. [47]

    Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Rgb-t saliency detection benchmark: Dataset, baselines, analysis and a novel approach,

    G. Wang, C. Li, Y . Ma, A. Zheng, J. Tang, and B. Luo, “Rgb-t saliency detection benchmark: Dataset, baselines, analysis and a novel approach,” inProc. 13th Image Graph. Technol. Appl., 2018, pp. 359–369

    2018

  41. [49]

    Weakly alignment-free rgbt salient object detection with deep correlation network,

    Z. Tu, Z. Li, C. Li, and J. Tang, “Weakly alignment-free rgbt salient object detection with deep correlation network,”IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 31, pp. 3752–3764, 2022

    2022

  42. [50]

    Caver: Cross-modal view- mixed transformer for bi-modal salient object detection,

    Y . Pang, X. Zhao, L. Zhang, and H. Lu, “Caver: Cross-modal view- mixed transformer for bi-modal salient object detection,”IEEE Trans- actions on Image Processing, vol. 32, pp. 892–904, 2023

    2023

  43. [51]

    Learning adaptive fusion bank for multi-modal salient object detection,

    K. Wang, Z. Tu, C. Li, C. Zhang, and B. Luo, “Learning adaptive fusion bank for multi-modal salient object detection,”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 7344– 7358, 2024

    2024

  44. [52]

    Cbam: Convolutional block attention module,

    S. Woo, J. Park, J.-Y . Lee, and I. S. Kweon, “Cbam: Convolutional block attention module,” inProceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), 2018, pp. 3–19

    2018

  45. [53]

    Does thermal really always matter for rgb-t salient object detection?

    R. Cong, K. Zhang, C. Zhang, F. Zheng, Y . Zhao, Q. Huang, and S. Kwong, “Does thermal really always matter for rgb-t salient object detection?”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 25, pp. 6971–6982, 2022. Yanyan Pengreceived the B.S. degree from the School of Physics, Northe...

    2022

  46. [2025]

    degree in control science and engineering with the Col- lege of Control Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

    He is currently pursuing the Ph.D. degree in control science and engineering with the Col- lege of Control Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. His research interests include object detection and related computer vision problems. Peifu Liureceived his...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.