Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 289 references

4th TDAMM Workshop White Paper

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Time-domain astronomy's limit has shifted from discovery to coordination.

desk verdict A strong, operationally concrete community white paper whose real value is the detailed observing plans and coordination framework, but it needs a proofreading pass and a sensitivity analysis before agencies should treat its headline numbers as calibrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.22404 v1 pith:EY67VURN submitted 2026-07-24 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.IM

classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.IM
keywords time-domainastrophysicsmulti-messengercommunityobservingplansalertbrokeragetransientfollow-upcoordinationgravitational-wavealertsobservatorypolicyrareevents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that with the coming generation of wide-field surveys, gravitational-wave detectors, and neutrino telescopes, the field of time-domain and multi-messenger astrophysics is no longer primarily limited by how many events are discovered, but by whether the community can triage, prioritize, and act on them in time. A sympathetic reader should come away believing that the marginal scientific return of new facilities will be decided by alert distribution, automated classification, standardized observatory metadata, joint target-of-opportunity mechanisms, and pre-negotiated response plans for rare events. The paper's concrete proposal is a framework of community observing plans—prewritten, community-governed observing strategies for eight rare source classes—that would replace ad hoc, facility-by-facility follow-up with pre-committed baseline observations and immediate public data release. If the paper is right, the next few years' biggest astrophysical payoffs will be won or lost in the coordination layer, not at the telescope.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the community observing plan: a pre-agreed, living strategy that turns rare-event follow-up from improvised requests into anchored commitments by specific observatories. Its components are concrete triggering criteria tied to measurable quantities, pre-specified communication pathways through alert and broker systems, minimal baseline commitments that guarantee a scientific floor, and decision trees that redirect resources as early data arrive. The paper also treats alert distribution, brokers, classification models, and cross-observatory coordination services as core scientific infrastructure; the observing plans are designed to operate on top of that stack.

What would settle it

Measure the actual steady-state alert rate in the first year of Rubin operations and the actual timing of Swift's reboost. If the alert stream stays near one million alerts per night instead of ten million, or if Swift is successfully reboosted and survives past 2028, the near-term urgency and the specific capability-gap calculus change materially; conversely, if the alert rate reaches ten million promptly and the high-energy fleet's rapid-response capacity declines as projected, the paper's central diagnosis is confirmed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central diagnostic claim is that time-domain and multi-messenger astrophysics has become response-limited: with the coming alert volumes, the binding constraint on scientific return is operational coordination, not discovery power. It supports this with projected rates from the Rubin survey, gravitational-wave and neutrino networks, and the aging of rapid-response high-energy assets, then proposes the community observing plan framework—pre-negotiated triggering criteria, baseline observational commitments, decision trees, and immediate public data release for eight rare source classes—as the mechanism to keep exceptional events from being lost in the noise.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's urgency rests on forward-looking projections—about ten million alerts per night, five to fifteen binary-neutron-star alerts per year in O5, and Swift re-entry within roughly twelve months—cited without uncertainty ranges. If any of these numbers is off by a large factor, the required scale of infrastructure and the observing-plan trigger thresholds would be miscalibrated, even if the general direction stands.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If alert distribution and brokering are funded as long-lived infrastructure, Rubin-scale alert streams can be filtered and classified in tens of seconds, preserving the ability to catch fast-evolving kilonovae and shock-cooling supernovae.
  • If Swift re-enters before a successor exists, the community loses the only routine source of arcsecond gamma-ray burst localizations within minutes, and the rapid-follow-up ecosystem loses its anchor.
  • If the gravitational-wave A+ upgrade slips relative to new high-energy missions, the overlap between detector sensitivity and monitor availability shrinks, reducing the expected number of joint detections.
  • If community observing plans are adopted, rare events like nearby core-collapse supernovae or Galactic magnetar giant flares would receive pre-committed multi-facility coverage with data released immediately, removing delays that have previously cost key early-time observations.
  • If observatory metadata become standardized machine-readable deliverables, automated coordination and real-time feasibility assessment across dozens of facilities become possible, cutting the manual overhead that currently delays multi-facility responses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An inference beyond the paper: the community observing plan framework could be stress-tested on semi-predictable events such as recurrent novae, which the text mentions, before being asked to handle once-per-century events, providing a low-risk way to validate trigger governance and data-release mechanics.
  • An inference beyond the paper: the paper's rate projections—ten million alerts per night, five to fifteen binary-neutron-star alerts per year, Swift re-entry within a year—have no uncertainty bars; if any is off by a large factor, the alert-tsunami framing and COP trigger thresholds will need recalibration even though the general direction of the recommendations would likely survive.
  • An inference beyond the paper: the same coordination layer that supports human-governed community observing plans could eventually close the loop, letting broker classifications automatically trigger queue-scheduled observations without a committee in the loop, reducing latency below anything a standing committee can achieve.
  • An inference beyond the paper: treating alert systems and software as core infrastructure carries an implicit policy shift—maintenance, validation, and support work would need to count as scholarship in hiring and promotion, or the workforce to run the proposed infrastructure will not be sustainable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This white paper, produced by the 4th Time-Domain and Multi-Messenger Astrophysics Workshop, argues that TDAMM science is transitioning from a discovery-limited to a follow-up/response-limited regime. It surveys the near-term discovery landscape (Rubin, Roman, Argus, ULTRASAT/UVEX, LVK O5, IceCube, Swift/Fermi/IPN, Einstein Probe/SVOM, StarBurst/COSI, radio facilities), the supporting infrastructure (GCN, SCiMMA, brokers, TOM/marshal systems, ACROSS/HEROIC/AEON+), and three classes of challenges (infrastructure limits, policy barriers, capability gaps), each with numbered recommendations F1–F19. Its central proposal is a framework for community observing plans (COPs): pre-negotiated, trigger-criteria-based, publicly released multi-facility response programs for rare events, with governance via a Trigger Advocate Committee and implementation through NASA's ACROSS. Appendices A and B provide eight detailed science overviews and observing strategies (GRBs, TDEs, XRBs, novae, SNe, magnetars, compact binary mergers, neutrinos).

Significance. The paper's value is as a concrete community planning artifact. Each major finding is anchored to specific evidence: the ~10^6 alert/night ceiling of Kowalski (§6.1.1), the 1–2 week ALMA DDT latency for AT2018cow (§6.2.4), the >1-day spectral delay for SN2023ixf, and the 2015–2025 IPN detector drought (§4.4.3). The COP framework is unusually operational, with triggering criteria, decision trees, baseline observational commitments, governance, and funding models, and the eight Appendix B plans are substantial deliverables. The paper also commits to open-science principles (immediate public data release, DOI/citation mechanisms). Its main weakness is that the quantitative calibration rests on point-estimate projections without uncertainty framing, but the qualitative direction of the argument is well supported by the assembled evidence.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3 (and §1.1 vs §6.3)] Section 3 asserts that 'TDAMM is quickly becoming no longer limited by discovery capability' and that the dominant challenges are operational; §1.1 repeats the framing ('transitioning from a discovery-limited to a follow-up-limited era'). This central premise is in tension with the manuscript's own §6.3 findings: §6.3.1–6.3.2 (Swift re-entry within ~12 months; StarBurst not a full replacement for Swift/Fermi), §6.3.3 (no successor identified for Swift-XRT/Chandra/XMM X-ray follow-up), §6.3.4 (IPN single-point vulnerability, Konus-Wind), and §6.3.6 (spectroscopic classification capacity as a 'bottleneck'). If key high-energy discovery and X-ray follow-up capabilities may be lost within the paper's stated 3–4 year horizon, the field is not uniformly 'no longer limited by discovery capability'; the claim must be scoped (e.g., to optical/NIR and messenger discovery) and explicitly reconciled
  2. [§4.1.1, §4.3.1, §4.4.4, §6.3.1 (calibrating F1 and §7.3.1)] Findings F1 and the Appendix B triggering/rate tables are calibrated to forward-looking point estimates presented without error bars, source dates, or alternative scenarios: Rubin 'up to 10 million alerts per night' (§4.1.1, rendered '10–20× ZTF' in §6.1.1), O5 BNS median 5/10/15 public alerts per year (§4.3.1), Einstein Probe '~80 fast X-ray transients per year' (§4.4.4), Swift 'high likelihood of re-entry in the next 12 months' (§6.3.1), and the IPN's '2015–2025... fewest number of planetary detectors ever' (§4.4.3). The paper should add a brief sensitivity discussion (e.g., early Rubin ramp, O5 delay relative to StarBurst, successful Swift reboost). The qualitative direction likely survives any plausible scenario, but the quantitative targets and the urgency framing are single-scenario as written.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.4 vs §7.2–7.4.4] The findings are numbered inconsistently. §2.4 lists F15–F18 as (respectively) Trigger Advocate Committee, living document, immediate public release, and credit mechanisms; §7.2 introduces a different 'F15 – Community-defined observing plans should be limited in scope,' §7.4.1–7.4.3 use F16–F18 for the first three of the original items, and §7.4.4 assigns F19 to credit mechanisms. Renumber so one number denotes one finding and update the consolidated list.
  2. [§4.3.2] The sentence 'IceCube is operating an MeV neutrino trigger... from a Galactic SNe ()' contains an empty citation; supply the reference.
  3. [§6.3.5–6.3.6] The heading 'Spectroscopy Bottleneck' and its opening paragraph appear twice: once embedded at the end of §6.3.5 and again at the start of §6.3.6. Delete the duplicated passage.
  4. [§6.1.6 (F1)] The F1 text contains a duplicated block: the paragraph beginning 'Funding agencies should also ensure that at least one U.S.-led broker...' repeats nearly verbatim the subsequent 'The workshop consensus was that agencies should prioritize functions and interfaces...' paragraph (compiled core, Python-facing interfaces, ML models, anti-consolidation). Consolidate.
  5. [Throughout] Typos and LaTeX artifacts: 'T able 1' in the §5.2.1 caption, 'W orkshop' in the byline, 'neccessary' (§6.3.3), 'Rubin will provided' (§4.1.2), 'The white paper also present a framework' (Abstract), and 'F ermi' in section headings.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the paper is a workshop-consensus white paper making policy recommendations; its claims rest on external facility projections and community discussion, not on fitting parameters or self-citation chains.

full rationale

The paper does not contain a derivation chain in the sense the review targets. Its principal assertions are forward-looking statements about facility capabilities (e.g., Rubin's alert rate, O5 BNS alert projections, Swift's re-entry risk) and workshop-consensus recommendations (findings F1-F18). None of these are derived from fitted parameters or from equations; the rate projections are quoted from external sources such as LSST documentation and LIGO/Virgo user guides. The community observing plan concept is traced to the 2nd TDAMM workshop white paper, and ACROSS is described as an outcome of the PhysCOS TDAMM strategic study, but these self-citations function as historical provenance and context, not as the load-bearing justification for the recommendations. The recommendations are justified by the stated existence of coordination gaps, policy barriers, and aging missions, which are documented independently in the text. There is no self-definitional reduction, no 'fitted input called prediction,' no imported uniqueness theorem, and no renamed empirical result. The absence of error bars on some rate projections is a legitimate uncertainty/correctness concern, but it is not circularity: the paper's qualitative conclusions do not require the exact point estimates to be true, and no prediction is constructed to equal its input by definition. A score of 0 is therefore appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 3 invented entities

This is a policy/community document, not a derivation, so the ledger contains no fitted free parameters. Its load-bearing inputs are facility projections (Rubin alert rate, O5 BNS rates, EP transient rate) and status claims (Swift re-entry timeline, IPN node count) quoted without uncertainty quantification; these function as axioms for the argument. The only genuinely new entities are organizational: COPs, the Trigger Advocate Committee, and proposed funding vehicles. Their effectiveness is untestable until implemented, so independent_evidence is false by construction rather than by deficiency.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption TDAMM is transitioning from a discovery-limited to a follow-up-limited era.
    Sections 1.1 and 3 state this as the framing premise; if false, the infrastructure-first recommendations (F1-F4) are misdirected.
  • domain assumption Rubin will produce up to 10 million alerts per night with ~60 s latency, requiring brokers to scale 10-20x beyond ZTF.
    Sections 4.1.1 and 6.1.1 quote this from facility plans without variance; it drives the broker-scaling requirements in F1.
  • domain assumption O5 BNS alert rates will be a median of 5/10/15 public alerts per year over three years, assuming A+ completion.
    Section 4.3.1; underpins the multimessenger urgency and the StarBurst/O5 alignment concern in Section 6.3.5.
  • domain assumption Workshop consensus is a valid basis for agency-facing recommendations.
    The findings F1-F18 are presented as 'workshop consensus'; the paper's authority derives from the community process (Sections 2-3).
  • domain assumption Immediate public data release with no proprietary period maximizes scientific return for COP data.
    Section 7.4.3 presents this as a 'central conclusion'; it is a value judgment about incentive structures, not a demonstrated empirical claim.
  • domain assumption ACROSS can serve as the implementing and administrative home for COPs and their funding.
    Section 7.6.1 assumes agency adoption and that a NASA program office is the right owner of community-defined plans.
invented entities (3)
  • Community Observing Plans (COPs)
    purpose: Pre-negotiated baseline observing protocols activated for rare, high-value events; the paper's central policy mechanism.
    New organizational artifact proposed in Section 7; no falsifiable handle exists until implemented, making effectiveness untestable by construction.
  • Trigger Advocate Committee
    purpose: Standing small committee to validate COP activations and guide early-time decision trees.
    Proposed governance body in Section 7.4.1; a policy proposal with no independent empirical handle.
  • ACROSS Science Leaders / Community Infrastructure Teams
    purpose: Proposed funding models (service-component fellowships; multi-institution infrastructure grants) to staff COP operations.
    Administrative proposals in Section 7.5; no falsifiable handle; their viability depends on agency adoption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of 4th TDAMM Workshop White Paper." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EY67VURN

@misc{pith2026260722404,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: 4th TDAMM Workshop White Paper},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EY67VURN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22404}
}
read the original abstract

Time-Domain and Multi-Messenger Astrophysics (TDAMM) is entering a new era in which the rate and diversity of transient discoveries will grow rapidly across electromagnetic, gravitational-wave, neutrino, and cosmic-ray facilities. The scientific return from these investments will increasingly depend not on discovery alone, but on the ability to identify, prioritize, and coordinate follow-up observations across a heterogeneous and globally distributed network of observatories. This white paper summarizes the outcomes of the Fourth TDAMM Workshop and assesses the near-term discovery landscape, the infrastructure and tools that support coordinated observations, and the technical, policy, and capability gaps that may limit future progress. The workshop identified three principal challenges: insufficiently scalable and interoperable alert and coordination infrastructure, policies that impede rapid multi-facility observations and rare-event science, and the potential loss of critical high-energy, rapid-response, and spectroscopic capabilities. The white paper identifies the need for sustained support for alert distribution, brokers, standardized observatory metadata, cross-facility coordination platforms, and unified follow-up repositories; expanded joint observing opportunities and funding mechanisms for coordinated analysis; and strategic investment in future TDAMM facilities. The white paper also present a framework for community observing plans that would establish pre-coordinated responses to rare, high-impact events, supported by transparent governance, immediate public data release, and regular community revision. Science overviews and detailed observing strategies are provided for gamma-ray bursts, tidal disruption events, X-ray binaries, novae, supernovae, magnetars, compact binary mergers, and high-energy neutrino sources.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

289 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G., et al

    Aartsen, M. G., et al. 2013, Science, 342, 1242856, doi: 10.1126/science.1242856

  2. [2]

    G., et al

    Aartsen, M. G., et al. 2017, Astropart. Phys., 92, 30, doi: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2017.05.002

  3. [4]

    G., et al

    Aartsen, M. G., et al. 2018b, Science, 361, 147, doi: 10.1126/science.aat2890

  4. [5]

    G., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., et al

    Aartsen, M. G., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., et al. 2018, Science, 361, eaat1378, doi: 10.1126/science.aat1378

  5. [7]

    G., et al

    Aartsen, M. G., et al. 2021b, J. Phys. G, 48, 060501, doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/abbd48

  6. [8]

    G., et al

    Abac, A. G., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 970, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5beb

  7. [9]

    G., Abbott, R., Abouelfettouh, I., et al

    Abac, A. G., Abbott, R., Abouelfettouh, I., et al. 2024, ApJ, 977, 255, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8de0

  8. [10]

    G., et al

    Abac, A. G., et al. 2026, Physical Review Letters, 136, 041403, doi: 10.1103/6c61-fm1n

Show all 289 references
  1. [11]

    2011, A&A, 535, A109, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117810

    Abbasi, R., Abdou, Y., Abu-Zayyad, T., et al. 2011, A&A, 535, A109, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117810

  2. [12]

    2021, Astrophys

    Abbasi, R., et al. 2021, Astrophys. J., 910, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe123

  3. [13]

    2022a, Science, 378, 538, doi: 10.1126/science.abg3395

    Abbasi, R., et al. 2022a, Science, 378, 538, doi: 10.1126/science.abg3395

  4. [14]

    2022b, Astrophys

    Abbasi, R., et al. 2022b, Astrophys. J., 939, 116, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9785

  5. [15]

    2022c, Astrophys

    Abbasi, R., et al. 2022c, Astrophys. J. Lett., 930, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac67d8

  6. [16]

    2023a, Science, 380, adc9818, doi: 10.1126/science.adc9818

    Abbasi, R., et al. 2023a, Science, 380, adc9818, doi: 10.1126/science.adc9818

  7. [17]

    2023b, Astrophys

    Abbasi, R., et al. 2023b, Astrophys. J. Lett., 946, L26, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acc077

  8. [18]

    2023c, Astrophys

    Abbasi, R., et al. 2023c, Astrophys. J., 959, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aceefc

  9. [19]

    2023d, Astrophys

    Abbasi, R., et al. 2023d, Astrophys. J. Lett., 949, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acd2c9

  10. [20]

    2025a, Astrophys

    Abbasi, R., et al. 2025a, Astrophys. J., 988, 141, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/addd05

  11. [21]

    2025b, Phys

    Abbasi, R., et al. 2025b, Phys. Rev. Lett., 135, 031001, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.135.031001

  12. [22]

    2026a, Astrophys

    Abbasi, R., et al. 2026a, Astrophys. J. Lett., 1000, L37, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae4aac

  13. [23]

    2026b, Phys

    Abbasi, R., et al. 2026b, Phys. Rev. Lett., 136, 121002, doi: 10.1103/2gh9-d4q7

  14. [24]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2017, ApJL, 848, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c

  15. [25]

    P., et al

    Abbott, B. P., et al. 2017, Astrophys. J. Lett., 848, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9

  16. [26]

    D., Acernese, F., et al

    Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., et al. 2023, Physical Review X, 13, 011048, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048

  17. [27]

    A., Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., et al

    Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., et al. 2010, Science, 329, 817, doi: 10.1126/science.1192537

  18. [28]

    A., Ansoldi, S., Antonelli, L

    Acciari, V. A., Ansoldi, S., Antonelli, L. A., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 689, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01640-z

  19. [29]

    2014, Science, 345, 554, doi: 10.1126/science.1253947

    Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., Albert, A., et al. 2014, Science, 345, 554, doi: 10.1126/science.1253947

  20. [30]

    2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 913, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1182-4

    Agostini, M., B¨ ohmer, M., Bosma, J., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 913, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1182-4

  21. [31]

    2021, Journal of Instrumentation, 16, P03025, doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/16/03/P03025

    Aguilar, J., Allison, P., Beatty, J., et al. 2021, Journal of Instrumentation, 16, P03025, doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/16/03/P03025

  22. [32]

    P., Anand, S., et al

    Ahumada, T., Singer, L. P., Anand, S., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 917, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01428-7

  23. [33]

    E., Antier, S., et al

    Ahumada, T., Andrews, J. E., Antier, S., et al. 2024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2401.02063

  24. [34]

    B., Baldini, L., et al

    Ajello, M., Atwood, W. B., Baldini, L., et al. 2022, Science, 376, 521, doi: 10.1126/science.abm3231

  25. [35]

    2007, ApJL, 665, L51, doi: 10.1086/521145

    Albert, J., Aliu, E., Anderhub, H., et al. 2007, ApJL, 665, L51, doi: 10.1086/521145

  26. [36]

    D., Margutti, R., Gomez, S., et al

    Alexander, K. D., Margutti, R., Gomez, S., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1000, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae40ab

  27. [37]

    2020, ApJ, 896, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab91ba ´Alvarez-Mu˜ niz, J., Alves Batista, R., Balagopal V., A., et al

    Alp, D., & Larsson, J. 2020, ApJ, 896, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab91ba ´Alvarez-Mu˜ niz, J., Alves Batista, R., Balagopal V., A., et al. 2019, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 63, 219501, doi: 10.1007/s11433-018-9385-7

  28. [38]

    2025, ApJL, 995, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae2028

    An, T. 2025, ApJL, 995, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae2028

  29. [39]

    R., & Stone, N

    Coughlin, E. R., & Stone, N. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 510, 1627, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3444

  30. [40]

    L., Quataert, E., Coughlin, E

    Andalman, Z. L., Quataert, E., Coughlin, E. R., & Nixon, C. J. 2025, Resolving the (Debate About) Nozzle Shocks in Tidal Disruption Events, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.08928

  31. [41]

    2017, PASA, 34, e069, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2017.65

    Andreoni, I., Ackley, K., Cooke, J., et al. 2017, PASA, 34, e069, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2017.65

  32. [42]

    W., Perley, D

    Andreoni, I., Coughlin, M. W., Perley, D. A., et al. 2022, Nature, 612, 430, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05465-8 130

  33. [43]

    2023, The Dynamic Universe: Realizing the Science Potential of Time Domain and Multi-Messenger Astrophysics (TDAMM), Workshop report, NASA Astrophysics Division

    Andrews, J., Branchesi, M., Breivik, K., et al. 2023, The Dynamic Universe: Realizing the Science Potential of Time Domain and Multi-Messenger Astrophysics (TDAMM), Workshop report, NASA Astrophysics Division. https://assets.science.nasa.gov/content/dam/ science/astro/programs...

  34. [44]

    R., Baldassare, V

    Angus, C. R., Baldassare, V. F., Mockler, B., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 1452, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01811-y

  35. [45]

    A., et al

    Arcavi, I., Hosseinzadeh, G., Howell, D. A., et al. 2017, Nature, 551, 64, doi: 10.1038/nature24291 Arg¨ uelles, C. A., Halzen, F., & Kurahashi, N. 2025, Phys. Rev. X, 15, 030501, doi: 10.1103/1z9l-kb1d

  36. [46]

    B., Abdo, A

    Atwood, W. B., Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, 1071, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1071

  37. [47]

    P., et al

    Aydi, E., Orio, M., Beardmore, A. P., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 572, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1759

  38. [48]

    V., Chomiuk, L., et al

    Aydi, E., Sokolovsky, K. V., Chomiuk, L., et al. 2020a, Nature Astronomy, 4, 776, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1070-y

  39. [49]

    2020b, ApJ, 905, 62, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc3bb

    Aydi, E., Chomiuk, L., Izzo, L., et al. 2020b, ApJ, 905, 62, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc3bb

  40. [50]

    D., M´ erand, A., et al

    Aydi, E., Monnier, J. D., M´ erand, A., et al. 2026, Nature Astronomy, 10, 271, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02725-1

  41. [52]

    2017, Rept

    Baiotti, L., & Rezzolla, L. 2017, Rept. Prog. Phys., 80, 096901, doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/aa67bb

  42. [53]

    A., & Hawley, J

    Balbus, S. A., & Hawley, J. F. 1991, ApJ, 376, 214, doi: 10.1086/170270

  43. [54]

    1993, ApJ, 413, 281, doi: 10.1086/172995

    Band, D., Matteson, J., Ford, L., et al. 1993, ApJ, 413, 281, doi: 10.1086/172995

  44. [55]

    2013, ApJ, 775, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/18

    Barnes, J., & Kasen, D. 2013, ApJ, 775, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/18

  45. [56]

    2022, Mon

    Bednarek, W., & ´Smia lkowski, A. 2022, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 511, 3339, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac243

  46. [57]

    2019, MNRAS, 487, 1426, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1391

    Kouveliotou, C. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 1426, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1391

  47. [58]

    B., & Granot, J

    Beniamini, P., Perets, H. B., & Granot, J. 2026, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 9, 57985, doi: 10.33232/001c.157985

  48. [59]

    2023, MNRAS, 520, 1872, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad208

    Beniamini, P., Wadiasingh, Z., Hare, J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 1872, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad208

  49. [60]

    2025, ApJ, 980, 211, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada947

    Beniamini, P., Wadiasingh, Z., Trigg, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 980, 211, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada947

  50. [61]

    2014, ARA&A, 52, 43, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035926

    Berger, E. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 43, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035926

  51. [62]

    2013, ApJL, 774, L23, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/774/2/L23

    Berger, E., Fong, W., & Chornock, R. 2013, ApJL, 774, L23, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/774/2/L23

  52. [63]

    M., Frail, D

    Berger, E., Soderberg, A. M., Frail, D. A., & Kulkarni, S. R. 2003, ApJL, 587, L5, doi: 10.1086/375158

  53. [64]

    2022, in 2022 4th International Conference on Robotics and Computer Vision (ICRCV) (IEEE), 606, doi: 10.22323/1.395.0606

    Bhatta, G., & Dhital, N. 2022, in 2022 4th International Conference on Robotics and Computer Vision (ICRCV) (IEEE), 606, doi: 10.22323/1.395.0606

  54. [65]

    M., Blewitt, G., Bratton, C

    Bionta, R. M., Blewitt, G., Bratton, C. B., et al. 1987, PhRvL, 58, 1494, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1494

  55. [66]

    Polnarev, A. G. 1984, Soviet Astronomy Letters, 10, 177, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1808.05287

  56. [67]

    S., Frail, D

    Bloom, J. S., Frail, D. A., & Kulkarni, S. R. 2003, ApJ, 594, 674, doi: 10.1086/377125

  57. [68]

    D., Ravi, V., Belov, K

    Bochenek, C. D., Ravi, V., Belov, K. V., et al. 2020, Nature, 587, 59, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2872-x

  58. [69]

    F., & Evans, A

    Bode, M. F., & Evans, A. 2008, Classical Novae, Vol. 43, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511536168

  59. [70]

    Bonnerot, C., Lu, W., & Hopkins, P. F. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 504, 4885, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab398

  60. [71]

    2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1912.12699, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1912.12699

    Braun, R., Bonaldi, A., Bourke, T., Keane, E., & Wagg, J. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1912.12699, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1912.12699

  61. [72]

    2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 890, 73, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6989

    Bricman, K., & Gomboc, A. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 890, 73, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6989

  62. [73]

    S., Fender, R

    Bright, J. S., Fender, R. P., Motta, S. E., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 697, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1023-5

  63. [74]

    2013, ApJ, 764, 179, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/179

    Bromberg, O., Nakar, E., Piran, T., & Sari, R. 2013, ApJ, 764, 179, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/179

  64. [75]

    M., Bagheri, M., Doro, M., et al

    Brown, A. M., Bagheri, M., Doro, M., et al. 2021, in Proceedings of Science, Vol. ICRC2021, Proceedings of the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2021), 1179, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2109.03125

  65. [76]

    2021, ApJL, 907, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abd8c8

    Burns, E., Svinkin, D., Hurley, K., et al. 2021, ApJL, 907, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abd8c8

  66. [77]

    L., Agullo, I., et al

    Burns, E., Fryer, C. L., Agullo, I., et al. 2025, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.03577

  67. [79]

    J., et al

    Campana, S., Mangano, V., Blustin, A. J., et al. 2006, Nature, 442, 1008, doi: 10.1038/nature04892

  68. [80]

    2017, Advances in Astronomy, 2017, 8929054, doi: 10.1155/2017/8929054

    Cano, Z., Wang, S.-Q., Dai, Z.-G., & Wu, X.-F. 2017, Advances in Astronomy, 2017, 8929054, doi: 10.1155/2017/8929054

  69. [81]

    2025, ApJL, 994, L46, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae1d67

    Carney, J., Andreoni, I., O’Connor, B., et al. 2025, ApJL, 994, L46, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae1d67

  70. [82]

    A., Kheirandish, A., & Murase, K

    Carpio, J. A., Kheirandish, A., & Murase, K. 2026a, https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08684 131

  71. [83]

    A., Kheirandish, A., & Zhang, B

    Carpio, J. A., Kheirandish, A., & Zhang, B. 2026b, JHEAp, 51, 100538, doi: 10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100538

  72. [84]

    D., et al

    Cendes, Y., Berger, E., Alexander, K. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 185, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5541

  73. [85]

    B., Krimm, H

    Cenko, S. B., Krimm, H. A., Horesh, A., et al. 2012, ApJ, 753, 77, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/77

  74. [86]

    C., Magnier, E

    Chambers, K. C., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05560, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1612.05560

  75. [87]

    2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 980, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adace7

    Natarajan, P. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 980, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adace7

  76. [88]

    Chen, X., Sesana, A., Madau, P., & Liu, F. K. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 729, 13, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/729/1/13

  77. [89]

    C.-K., Pitik, T., Longo Micchi, L

    Cheong, P. C.-K., Pitik, T., Longo Micchi, L. F., & Radice, D. 2025, ApJL, 978, L38, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ada1cc

  78. [90]

    C., Jean, P., Shore, S

    Cheung, C. C., Jean, P., Shore, S. N., et al. 2016, ApJ, 826, 142, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/142

  79. [91]

    A., & Li, Z.-Y

    Chevalier, R. A., & Li, Z.-Y. 2000, ApJ, 536, 195, doi: 10.1086/308914 CHIME/FRB Collaboration, Andersen, B. C., Bandura, K. M., et al. 2020, Nature, 587, 54, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2863-y

  80. [92]

    D., & Shen, K

    Chomiuk, L., Metzger, B. D., & Shen, K. J. 2021, ARA&A, 59, 391, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-114502

  81. [93]

    D., Yang, J., et al

    Chomiuk, L., Linford, J. D., Yang, J., et al. 2014, Nature, 514, 339, doi: 10.1038/nature13773

  82. [94]

    2017, ApJL, 848, L19, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa905c

    Chornock, R., Berger, E., Kasen, D., et al. 2017, ApJL, 848, L19, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa905c

  83. [95]

    A., Gaspari, N., Levan, A

    Chrimes, A. A., Gaspari, N., Levan, A. J., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A168, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555128

  84. [96]

    O., Mazzarella, J

    Cook, D. O., Mazzarella, J. M., Helou, G., et al. 2023, ApJS, 268, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acdd06

  85. [97]

    J., Gaggero, D., Markoff, S., & Zhang, S

    Cooper, A. J., Gaggero, D., Markoff, S., & Zhang, S. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 3212, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa373

  86. [98]

    J., & Wadiasingh, Z

    Cooper, A. J., & Wadiasingh, Z. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 2133, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1813

  87. [99]

    Y., Tanvir, N

    Cordier, B., Wei, J. Y., Tanvir, N. R., et al. 2025, A&A, 704, L7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556580 Core Community Survey Definition Committees, R. . 2025, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.10574

  88. [100]

    1997, Nature, 387, 783, doi: 10.1038/42885 Coti Zelati, F., Rea, N., Pons, J

    Costa, E., Frontera, F., Heise, J., et al. 1997, Nature, 387, 783, doi: 10.1038/42885 Coti Zelati, F., Rea, N., Pons, J. A., Campana, S., &

  89. [101]

    2018, MNRAS, 474, 961, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2679

    Esposito, P. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 961, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2679

  90. [102]

    W., Bloom, J

    Coughlin, M. W., Bloom, J. S., Nir, G., et al. 2023, ApJS, 267, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acdee1

  91. [103]

    A., Foley, R

    Coulter, D. A., Foley, R. J., Kilpatrick, C. D., et al. 2017, Science, 358, 1556, doi: 10.1126/science.aap9811

  92. [104]

    J., Fox, D

    Cucchiara, A., Levan, A. J., Fox, D. B., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 7, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/7

  93. [105]

    C., & Miller, M

    Dai, L., McKinney, J. C., & Miller, M. C. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 812, L39, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/812/2/L39

  94. [106]

    Miller, M. C. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 859, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aab429

  95. [107]

    J., Henze, M., Bode, M

    Darnley, M. J., Henze, M., Bode, M. F., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 149, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/149 De Sarkar, A., Nayana, A. J., Roy, N., Razzaque, S., &

  96. [108]

    Anupama, G. C. 2023, ApJ, 951, 62, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd6ed della Valle, M., Bianchini, A., Livio, M., & Orio, M. 1992, A&A, 266, 232 Della Valle, M., Chincarini, G., Panagia, N., et al. 2006, Nature, 444, 1050, doi: 10.1038/nature05374

  97. [109]

    M., Metzger, B

    Derdzinski, A. M., Metzger, B. D., & Lazzati, D. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 1314, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx829

  98. [110]

    G., Kulkarni, S

    Djorgovski, S. G., Kulkarni, S. R., Bloom, J. S., et al. 1998, ApJL, 508, L17, doi: 10.1086/311729

  99. [111]

    R., Piro, A

    Drout, M. R., Piro, A. L., Shappee, B. J., et al. 2017, Science, 358, 1570, doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0049

  100. [112]

    C., & Thompson, C

    Duncan, R. C., & Thompson, C. 1992, ApJL, 392, L9, doi: 10.1086/186413

  101. [113]

    J., et al

    Dyer, M. J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.17176. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.17176

  102. [114]

    Eichler, D., Livio, M., Piran, T., & Schramm, D. N. 1989, Nature, 340, 126, doi: 10.1038/340126a0

  103. [115]

    2022, Astrophys

    Eichmann, B., Oikonomou, F., Salvatore, S., Dettmar, R.-J., & Becker Tjus, J. 2022, Astrophys. J., 939, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9588

  104. [116]

    2026, https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15644

    Eichmann, B., Salvatore, S., del Palacio, S., et al. 2026, https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15644

  105. [117]

    2020, ApJL, 896, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab9742

    Esposito, P., Rea, N., Borghese, A., et al. 2020, ApJL, 896, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab9742

  106. [118]

    R., & Kochanek, C

    Evans, C. R., & Kochanek, C. S. 1989, ApJL, 346, L13, doi: 10.1086/185567

  107. [119]

    A., Cenko, S

    Evans, P. A., Cenko, S. B., Kennea, J. A., et al. 2017, Science, 358, 1565, doi: 10.1126/science.aap9580

  108. [120]

    Eyles-Ferris, R. A. J., King, A., Starling, R. L. C., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 546, stag005, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stag005

  109. [121]

    2006, ApJL, 641, L93, doi: 10.1086/504111

    Taniguchi, K. 2006, ApJL, 641, L93, doi: 10.1086/504111

  110. [122]

    2004, A&A, 414, 895, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031683 132

    Falcke, H., K¨ ording, E., & Markoff, S. 2004, A&A, 414, 895, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031683 132

  111. [123]

    2006, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, ed

    Fender, R. 2006, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, ed. W. H. G. Lewin & M. van der Klis, Vol. 39, 381–419, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0303339

  112. [124]

    P., et al

    Fender, R., Stewart, A., Macquart, J. P., et al. 2015, in Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), 51, doi: 10.22323/1.215.0051 Fern´ andez, R., & Metzger, B. D. 2016, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 66, 23, doi: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-102115-044819

  113. [125]

    Fiorillo, D. F. G., Comisso, L., Peretti, E., Petropoulou, M., & Sironi, L. 2025, ApJ, 989, 215, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adec9c

  114. [126]

    2023, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics (Springer Nature Singapore), 143, doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0 95-1

    Fornasini, F., Antoniou, V., & Dubus, G. 2023, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics (Springer Nature Singapore), 143, doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0 95-1

  115. [127]

    B., DeLaunay, J

    Fox, D. B., DeLaunay, J. J., Keivani, A., et al. 2017, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 10845, 1

  116. [128]

    Yost, S. A. 2004, ApJ, 600, 828, doi: 10.1086/380108

  117. [129]

    A., Waxman, E., & Kulkarni, S

    Frail, D. A., Waxman, E., & Kulkarni, S. R. 2000, ApJ, 537, 191, doi: 10.1086/309024

  118. [130]

    A., Kulkarni, S

    Frail, D. A., Kulkarni, S. R., Sari, R., et al. 2001, ApJL, 562, L55, doi: 10.1086/338119

  119. [131]

    2023, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 675, A100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346565

    Franchini, A., Bonetti, M., Lupi, A., et al. 2023, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 675, A100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346565

  120. [132]

    2018, A&A, 609, A120, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731516

    Buson, S. 2018, A&A, 609, A120, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731516

  121. [133]

    D., Arcavi, I., & Zabludoff, A

    French, K. D., Arcavi, I., & Zabludoff, A. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 818, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/818/1/L21

  122. [134]

    Zabludoff, A. I. 2020, Space Science Reviews, 216, 32, doi: 10.1007/s11214-020-00657-y

  123. [135]

    2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2110.01622

    Frostig, D., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2110.01622. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.01622

  124. [136]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.12384

    Frostig, D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.12384. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.12384

  125. [137]

    L., & Woosley, S

    Fryer, C. L., & Woosley, S. E. 1998, ApJL, 502, L9, doi: 10.1086/311493

  126. [138]

    Fynbo, J. P. U., Watson, D., Th¨ one, C. C., et al. 2006, Nature, 444, 1047, doi: 10.1038/nature05375

  127. [139]

    B., Price, P

    Gal-Yam, A., Fox, D. B., Price, P. A., et al. 2006, Nature, 444, 1053, doi: 10.1038/nature05373

  128. [140]

    J., Vreeswijk, P

    Galama, T. J., Vreeswijk, P. M., van Paradijs, J., et al. 1998, Nature, 395, 670, doi: 10.1038/27150

  129. [141]

    A., Jencson, J

    Gandhi, K., Mahabal, A. A., Jencson, J. E., et al. 2026, https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05103

  130. [142]

    2015, ApJ, 807, 163, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/807/2/163

    Gao, H., Ding, X., Wu, X.-F., Dai, Z.-G., & Zhang, B. 2015, ApJ, 807, 163, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/807/2/163

  131. [143]

    2019, Nature Astron., 3, 88, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0610-1

    Gao, S., Fedynitch, A., Winter, W., & Pohl, M. 2019, Nature Astron., 3, 88, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0610-1

  132. [144]

    L., De Colle, F., Cabrera, J

    Garcia-Cifuentes, K., Becerra, R. L., De Colle, F., Cabrera, J. I., & Del Burgo, C. 2023, ApJ, 951, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd176

  133. [145]

    2004, ApJ, 611, 1005, doi: 10.1086/422091

    Gehrels, N., Chincarini, G., Giommi, P., et al. 2004, ApJ, 611, 1005, doi: 10.1086/422091

  134. [146]

    P., Barthelmy, S

    Gehrels, N., Norris, J. P., Barthelmy, S. D., et al. 2006, Nature, 444, 1044, doi: 10.1038/nature05376

  135. [147]

    L., et al

    Gendre, B., Stratta, G., Atteia, J. L., et al. 2013, ApJ, 766, 30, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/30

  136. [148]

    2021, ARA&A, 59, 21, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-111720-030029

    Gezari, S. 2021, ARA&A, 59, 21, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-111720-030029

  137. [149]

    2022, ApJ, 932, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6e43

    Ghirlanda, G., & Salvaterra, R. 2022, ApJ, 932, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6e43

  138. [150]

    2019, Science, 363, 968, doi: 10.1126/science.aau8815

    Ghirlanda, G., et al. 2019, Science, 363, 968, doi: 10.1126/science.aau8815

  139. [151]

    2025, A&A, 703, A92, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555450

    Gianfagna, G., Piro, L., Bruni, G., et al. 2025, A&A, 703, A92, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555450

  140. [152]

    2022, Galaxies, 10, 74, doi: 10.3390/galaxies10030074

    Gill, R., & Granot, J. 2022, Galaxies, 10, 74, doi: 10.3390/galaxies10030074

  141. [153]

    H., & Smartt, S

    Gillanders, J. H., & Smartt, S. J. 2025, MNRAS, 538, 1663, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf287

  142. [154]

    C., & Steinberg, E

    Giron, I., Krief, M., Stone, N. C., & Steinberg, E. 2026, Multigroup Radiation Diffusion on a Moving Mesh: Implementation in RICH and Application to Tidal Disruption Events, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.05120

  143. [155]

    2017, ApJL, 848, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8f41

    Goldstein, A., Veres, P., Burns, E., et al. 2017, ApJL, 848, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8f41

  144. [156]

    2022, MNRAS, 511, 1454, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac029

    Vecchio, A. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 1454, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac029

  145. [157]

    P., Levan, A

    Gompertz, B. P., Levan, A. J., Laskar, T., et al. 2026, ApJL, 997, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae2ed9

  146. [158]

    C., Aydi, E., Page, K

    Gordon, A. C., Aydi, E., Page, K. L., et al. 2021, ApJ, 910, 134, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe547

  147. [159]

    N., & Lander, S

    Gourgouliatos, K. N., & Lander, S. K. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 3578, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1869

  148. [160]

    J., Kulkarni, S

    Graham, M. J., Kulkarni, S. R., Bellm, E. C., et al. 2019, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 131, 078001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab006c

  149. [161]

    Granot, J., Panaitescu, A., Kumar, P., & Woosley, S. E. 2002, ApJL, 570, L61, doi: 10.1086/340991

  150. [162]

    B., Gill, R., Beniamini, P., & O’Connor, B

    Granot, J., Perets, H. B., Gill, R., Beniamini, P., & O’Connor, B. 2026, MNRAS, 547, stag328, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stag328

  151. [163]

    2002, ApJ, 568, 820, doi: 10.1086/338966 133

    Granot, J., & Sari, R. 2002, ApJ, 568, 820, doi: 10.1086/338966 133

  152. [164]

    E., Strader, J., & Ho, L

    Greene, J. E., Strader, J., & Ho, L. C. 2020, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 58, 257, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021835

  153. [165]

    A., Kann, D

    Greiner, J., Mazzali, P. A., Kann, D. A., et al. 2015, Nature, 523, 189, doi: 10.1038/nature14579

  154. [166]

    2019, in The La Silla Observatory - From the Inauguration to the Future, 33, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3471366

    Groot, P., Bloemen, S., & Jonker, P. 2019, in The La Silla Observatory - From the Inauguration to the Future, 33, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3471366

  155. [167]

    2023, JCAP, 2023, 015, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2023/03/015

    Guetta, D., Hillman, Y., & Della Valle, M. 2023, JCAP, 2023, 015, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2023/03/015

  156. [169]

    2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 767, 25, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/25

    Guillochon, J., & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 767, 25, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/25

  157. [170]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.13019, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2308.13019

    Guolo, M., Gezari, S., Yao, Y., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.13019, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2308.13019

  158. [172]

    Hameury, J. M. 2020, Advances in Space Research, 66, 1004, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2019.10.022

  159. [173]

    2025, ApJ, 988, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/addd13

    Hamidani, H., Ioka, K., Kashiyama, K., & Tanaka, M. 2025, ApJ, 988, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/addd13

  160. [174]

    2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 908, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abdcb4

    Hammerstein, E., Gezari, S., van Velzen, S., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 908, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abdcb4

  161. [175]

    2023, ApJ, 942, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca283

    Hammerstein, E., van Velzen, S., Gezari, S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 942, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca283

  162. [176]

    B., Andreoni, I., et al

    Hammerstein, E., Cenko, S. B., Andreoni, I., et al. 2026, ApJ, 996, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1838

  163. [177]

    H., Seth, A

    Hannah, C. H., Seth, A. C., Stone, N. C., & van Velzen, S. 2024, The Astronomical Journal, 168, 137, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad630a

  164. [178]

    K., & Lai, D

    Harding, A. K., & Lai, D. 2006, Reports on Progress in Physics, 69, 2631, doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/69/9/R03

  165. [179]

    Hashimoto, T., Goto, T., On, A. Y. L., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 4107, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2238

  166. [180]

    2021, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01309-z

    Hayasaki, K. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01309-z

  167. [181]

    2018, Astrophys

    He, H.-N., Kusenko, A., Nagataki, S., Fan, Y.-Z., & Wei, D.-M. 2018, Astrophys. J., 856, 119, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab360

  168. [182]

    I., Kippen, R

    Heise, J., Zand, J. I., Kippen, R. M., & Woods, P. M. 2001, in Gamma-ray Bursts in the Afterglow Era, ed. E. Costa, F. Frontera, & J. Hjorth, 16, doi: 10.1007/10853853 4 H.E.S.S. Collaboration, Aharonian, F., Ait Benkhali, F., et al. 2022, Science, 376, 77, doi: 10.1126/scienc...

  169. [183]

    Hills, J. G. 1975, Nature, 254, 295, doi: 10.1038/254295a0

  170. [184]

    T., Shappee, B

    Hinkle, J. T., Shappee, B. J., Auchettl, K., et al. 2025, Science Advances, 11, eadt0074, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adt0074

  171. [185]

    1987, PhRvL, 58, 1490, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1490

    Hirata, K., Kajita, T., Koshiba, M., et al. 1987, PhRvL, 58, 1490, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1490

  172. [186]

    2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 371, 20120275, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0275

    Hjorth, J. 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 371, 20120275, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0275

  173. [188]

    Hjorth, J., & Bloom, J. S. 2012b, in Chapter 9 in ”Gamma-Ray Bursts, ed. C. Kouveliotou, R. A. M. J. Wijers, & S. Woosley, 169–190, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1104.2274

  174. [189]

    2003, Nature, 423, 847, doi: 10.1038/nature01750

    Hjorth, J., Sollerman, J., Møller, P., et al. 2003, Nature, 423, 847, doi: 10.1038/nature01750

  175. [190]

    2019, Nature Astron., 3, 940, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0820-1

    Hotokezaka, K., Nakar, E., Gottlieb, O., et al. 2019, Nature Astron., 3, 940, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0820-1

  176. [191]

    2026, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol

    Howell, A. 2026, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 247, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 417.04

  177. [192]

    A., & Global Supernova Project

    Howell, D. A., & Global Supernova Project. 2017, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 230, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #230, 318.03

  178. [193]

    2020, ApJ, 902, 1, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb3c9

    Hu, C.-P., Begi¸ carslan, B., G¨ uver, T., et al. 2020, ApJ, 902, 1, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb3c9

  179. [194]

    2024, Nature, 626, 500, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-07012-5

    Hu, C.-P., Narita, T., Enoto, T., et al. 2024, Nature, 626, 500, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-07012-5

  180. [195]

    Hu, C.-P., Wadiasingh, Z., Ho, W. C. G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 989, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adea4e

  181. [196]

    F., Mandel, I., Nealon, R., & Price, D

    Hu, F. F., Mandel, I., Nealon, R., & Price, D. J. 2026, The Astrophysical Journal, 996, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae27cc

  182. [197]

    W., & Jiang, Y.-f

    Huang, X., Davis, S. W., & Jiang, Y.-f. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 953, 117, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace0be

  183. [198]

    W., & Jiang, Y.-f

    Huang, X., Davis, S. W., & Jiang, Y.-f. 2024, ApJ, 974, 165, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6c39

  184. [199]

    B., Roberts, C

    Humensky, T. B., Roberts, C. J., Barclay, T., et al. 2024, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 11, 1401785, doi: 10.3389/fspas.2024.1401785

  185. [201]

    J., Veilleux, S., et al

    Hung, T., Foley, R. J., Veilleux, S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 917, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf4c3

  186. [202]

    E., Smith, D

    Hurley, K., Boggs, S. E., Smith, D. M., et al. 2005, Nature, 434, 1098, doi: 10.1038/nature03519

  187. [203]

    J., et al

    Hurley-Walker, N., Rea, N., McSweeney, S. J., et al. 2023, Nature, 619, 487, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06202-5 134 IceCube Collaboration, Aartsen, M. G., Ackermann, M., et al. 2018, Science, 361, eaat1378, doi: 10.1126/science.aat1378 IceCube Collaboration, Abbasi, R., Ackermann...

  188. [204]

    S., Lehtinen, N

    Inan, U. S., Lehtinen, N. G., Moore, R. C., et al. 2007, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L08103, doi: 10.1029/2006GL029145

  189. [205]

    2020, Astrophys

    Inoue, Y., Khangulyan, D., & Doi, A. 2020, Astrophys. J. Lett., 891, L33, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab7661

  190. [206]

    2016, ApJ, 833, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/110

    Ioka, K., Hotokezaka, K., & Piran, T. 2016, ApJ, 833, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/110

  191. [207]

    L., Belloni, T., Stella, L., et al

    Israel, G. L., Belloni, T., Stella, L., et al. 2005, ApJL, 628, L53, doi: 10.1086/432615 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 873, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c

  192. [208]

    A., Nomoto, K., et al

    Iwamoto, K., Mazzali, P. A., Nomoto, K., et al. 1998, Nature, 395, 672, doi: 10.1038/27155

  193. [209]

    2015, ApJL, 808, L14, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/808/1/L14

    Izzo, L., Della Valle, M., Mason, E., et al. 2015, ApJL, 808, L14, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/808/1/L14

  194. [210]

    Janka, H. T. 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5 4

  195. [211]

    K., Severin, J

    Jespersen, C. K., Severin, J. B., Steinhardt, C. L., et al. 2020, ApJL, 896, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab964d

  196. [212]

    Jiang, S.-Q., Xu, D., van Hoof, A. P. C., et al. 2025, ApJL, 988, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/addebf

  197. [213]

    2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 830, 125, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/125

    Jiang, Y.-F., Guillochon, J., & Loeb, A. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 830, 125, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/125

  198. [214]

    G., Glennie, A., Heida, M., et al

    Jonker, P. G., Glennie, A., Heida, M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, 14, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/14 Jos´ e, J., & Hernanz, M. 1998, ApJ, 494, 680, doi: 10.1086/305244

  199. [215]

    J., et al

    Kantzas, D., Markoff, S., Cooper, A. J., et al. 2023, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 524, 1326, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1909

  200. [216]

    M., Reynolds, C., & Dai, L

    Kara, E., Miller, J. M., Reynolds, C., & Dai, L. 2016, Nature, 535, 388, doi: 10.1038/nature18007

  201. [217]

    L., et al

    Kara, M., Torres-Lara, S., Baxter, A. L., et al. 2024, Journal of Instrumentation, 19, P10017, doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/19/10/P10017

  202. [218]

    Karavola, D., Petropoulou, M., Fiorillo, D. F. G., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.01533, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.01533

  203. [220]

    2017, Nature, 551, 80, doi: 10.1038/nature24453

    Ramirez-Ruiz, E. 2017, Nature, 551, 80, doi: 10.1038/nature24453

  204. [221]

    M., Nakar, E., Singer, L

    Kasliwal, M. M., Nakar, E., Singer, L. P., et al. 2017, Science, 358, 1559, doi: 10.1126/science.aap9455

  205. [222]

    Katz, J. I. 1982, The Astrophysical Journal, 260, 371, doi: 10.1086/160262

  206. [223]

    2006, Nature, 440, 184, doi: 10.1038/nature04498

    Kawai, N., Kosugi, G., Aoki, K., et al. 2006, Nature, 440, 184, doi: 10.1038/nature04498

  207. [224]

    2022, ApJ, 937, 64, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8d5e

    Kawash, A., Chomiuk, L., Strader, J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 937, 64, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8d5e

  208. [225]

    2018, ApJ, 864, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad59a

    Keivani, A., Murase, K., Petropoulou, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 864, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad59a

  209. [226]

    2012, PhRvD, 85, 024037, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.024037

    Kesden, M. 2012, PhRvD, 85, 024037, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.024037

  210. [227]

    2023, Astrophys

    Kheirandish, A., & Murase, K. 2023, Astrophys. J. Lett., 956, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf84f

  211. [228]

    Kheirandish, A., Murase, K., & Kimura, S. S. 2021, Astrophys. J., 922, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1c77

  212. [229]

    D., Coulter, D

    Kilpatrick, C. D., Coulter, D. A., Arcavi, I., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 258, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac23c6

  213. [230]

    Kimura, S. S. 2023, , 433doi: 10.1142/9789811282645 0009 KM3NeT Collaboration. 2025, Nature, 638, 376, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08543-1

  214. [231]

    E., Briggs, M., et al

    Kocevski, D., Grove, J. E., Briggs, M., et al. 2024, in AAS High Energy Astrophysics Division Meeting #21

  215. [232]

    2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 765, 116, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/116

    Kocevski, D., & Petrosian, V. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 765, 116, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/116

  216. [233]

    Kochanek, C. S. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 458, 127, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw267

  217. [234]

    2022, ApJ, 938, 91, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9184 K¨ onig, O., Wilms, J., Arcodia, R., et al

    Kojima, Y. 2022, ApJ, 938, 91, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9184 K¨ onig, O., Wilms, J., Arcodia, R., et al. 2022, Nature, 605, 248, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04635-y

  218. [235]

    2017, GRB Coordinates Network, 21916, 1

    Kopper, C., & Blaufuss, E. 2017, GRB Coordinates Network, 21916, 1

  219. [236]

    A., Fishman, G

    Kouveliotou, C., Meegan, C. A., Fishman, G. J., et al. 1993, ApJL, 413, L101, doi: 10.1086/186969

  220. [237]

    1998, Nature, 393, 235, doi: 10.1038/30410

    Kouveliotou, C., Dieters, S., Strohmayer, T., et al. 1998, Nature, 393, 235, doi: 10.1038/30410

  221. [238]

    1999, ApJL, 510, L115, doi: 10.1086/311813

    Kouveliotou, C., Strohmayer, T., Hurley, K., et al. 1999, ApJL, 510, L115, doi: 10.1086/311813

  222. [239]

    R., Frail, D

    Kulkarni, S. R., Frail, D. A., Wieringa, M. H., et al. 1998, Nature, 395, 663, doi: 10.1038/27139

  223. [240]

    R., Harrison, F

    Kulkarni, S. R., Harrison, F. A., Grefenstette, B. W., et al. 2021, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2111.15608

  224. [241]

    2003, ApJ, 591, 1075, doi: 10.1086/375186

    Kumar, P., & Granot, J. 2003, ApJ, 591, 1075, doi: 10.1086/375186

  225. [242]

    2015, PhR, 561, 1, doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008

    Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. 2015, PhR, 561, 1, doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008

  226. [243]

    2023, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers Conference Series, Vol

    Kutyrev, A., et al. 2023, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers Conference Series, Vol. 12680 135

  227. [244]

    S., & Fang, K

    Kuze, R., Kimura, S. S., & Fang, K. 2025, Astrophys. J., 985, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adcc1b

  228. [245]

    Lamb, D. Q. 1982, AIP Conference Proceedings, 77, 249, doi: 10.1063/1.33222

  229. [246]

    K., Andersson, N., Antonopoulou, D., & Watts, A

    Lander, S. K., Andersson, N., Antonopoulou, D., & Watts, A. L. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 2047, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv432

  230. [247]

    M., Corbett, H., Galliher, N

    Law, N. M., Corbett, H., Galliher, N. W., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 035003, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac4811

  231. [248]

    J., Tanvir, N

    Levan, A. J., Tanvir, N. R., Cenko, S. B., et al. 2011, Science, 333, 199, doi: 10.1126/science.1207143

  232. [249]

    J., Tanvir, N

    Levan, A. J., Tanvir, N. R., Starling, R. L. C., et al. 2014, ApJ, 781, 13, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/13

  233. [250]

    J., Malesani, D

    Levan, A. J., Malesani, D. B., Gompertz, B. P., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 976, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01998-8

  234. [251]

    J., Gompertz, B

    Levan, A. J., Gompertz, B. P., Salafia, O. S., et al. 2024, Nature, 626, 737, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06759-1

  235. [252]

    J., Schneider, B., Le Floc’h, E., et al

    Levan, A. J., Schneider, B., Le Floc’h, E., et al. 2025a, A&A, 704, L8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556581

  236. [253]

    J., Martin-Carrillo, A., Laskar, T., et al

    Levan, A. J., Martin-Carrillo, A., Laskar, T., et al. 2025b, ApJL, 990, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf8e1

  237. [254]

    J., Jonker, P

    Levan, A. J., Jonker, P. G., Saccardi, A., et al. 2025c, Nature Astronomy, 9, 1375, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02612-9 LHAASO Collaboration, Cao, Z., Aharonian, F., et al. 2025, National Science Review, 12, nwaf496, doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaf496

  238. [255]

    K., Lin, L., Xiong, S

    Li, C. K., Lin, L., Xiong, S. L., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01302-6

  239. [256]

    2026, Science Bulletin, 71, 538, doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2025.12.050

    Li, D., Zhang, W., Yang, J., et al. 2026, Science Bulletin, 71, 538, doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2025.12.050

  240. [257]

    D., Chomiuk, L., et al

    Li, K.-L., Metzger, B. D., Chomiuk, L., et al. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 697, doi: 10.1038/s41550-017-0222-1

  241. [258]

    1998, ApJL, 507, L59, doi: 10.1086/311680

    Li, L.-X., & Paczy´ nski, B. 1998, ApJL, 507, L59, doi: 10.1086/311680

  242. [259]

    P., & Antiochos, S

    Liang, E. P., & Antiochos, S. K. 1984, Nature, 310, 121, doi: 10.1038/310121a0

  243. [260]

    D., & Quataert, E

    Linial, I., Metzger, B. D., & Quataert, E. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 991, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adfa0e

  244. [261]

    2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 564, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02449-8

    Liu, Y., Sun, H., Xu, D., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 564, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02449-8

  245. [262]

    Livio, M., Shankar, A., Burkert, A., & Truran, J. W. 1990, ApJ, 356, 250, doi: 10.1086/168836

  246. [263]

    R., & Pringle, J

    Lodato, G., King, A. R., & Pringle, J. E. 2009, MNRAS, 392, 332, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14049.x

  247. [264]

    R., Bailes, M., McLaughlin, M

    Lorimer, D. R., Bailes, M., McLaughlin, M. A., Narkevic, D. J., & Crawford, F. 2007, Science, 318, 777, doi: 10.1126/science.1147532

  248. [265]

    E., Shannon, R

    Lower, M. E., Shannon, R. M., Johnston, S., & Bailes, M. 2020, ApJL, 896, L37, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab9898

  249. [266]

    2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 492, 686, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3405

    Lu, W., & Bonnerot, C. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 492, 686, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3405

  250. [267]

    2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 865, 128, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad54a

    Lu, W., & Kumar, P. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 865, 128, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad54a

  251. [268]

    Luna, G. J. M., Page, K. L., Kuin, N. P. M., et al. 2025, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 17436, 1

  252. [269]

    A., Burns, E., et al

    Macquet, A., Bizouard, M. A., Burns, E., et al. 2021, ApJ, 918, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0efd

  253. [270]

    2013, A&A, 551, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220289

    Martin, P., & Dubus, G. 2013, A&A, 551, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220289

  254. [271]

    M., Stanek, K

    Matheson, T., Garnavich, P. M., Stanek, K. Z., et al. 2003, ApJ, 599, 394, doi: 10.1086/379228

  255. [272]

    P., Golentskii, S

    Mazets, E. P., Golentskii, S. V., Ilinskii, V. N., Aptekar, R. L., & Guryan, I. A. 1979, Nature, 282, 587, doi: 10.1038/282587a0

  256. [273]

    A., Deng, J., Tominaga, N., et al

    Mazzali, P. A., Deng, J., Tominaga, N., et al. 2003, ApJL, 599, L95, doi: 10.1086/381259

  257. [274]

    2026, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol

    McCully, C., & Street, R. 2026, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 247, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 326.02

  258. [275]

    G., D’Avanzo, P., et al

    Melandri, A., Bernardini, M. G., D’Avanzo, P., et al. 2015, A&A, 581, A86, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526660

  259. [276]

    2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 960, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acfee0

    Ramirez-Ruiz, E. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 960, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acfee0

  260. [277]

    2020, ApJL, 898, L29, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aba2cf

    Mereghetti, S., Savchenko, V., Ferrigno, C., et al. 2020, ApJL, 898, L29, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aba2cf

  261. [279]

    2024b, Nature, 629, 58, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07285-4

    Mereghetti, S., Rigoselli, M., Salvaterra, R., et al. 2024b, Nature, 629, 58, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07285-4

  262. [280]

    2003, MNRAS, 345, 1057, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07017.x M´ esz´ aros, P., & Rees, M

    Merloni, A., Heinz, S., & di Matteo, T. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 1057, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07017.x M´ esz´ aros, P., & Rees, M. J. 1997, ApJ, 476, 232, doi: 10.1086/303625 M´ esz´ aros, P., & Rees, M. J. 2001, ApJL, 556, L37, doi: 10.1086/322934 M´ esz´ aros, P., Rees, M. J...

  263. [281]

    Metzger, B. D. 2017, Living Reviews in Relativity, 20, 3, doi: 10.1007/s41114-017-0006-z

  264. [283]

    Metzger, B. D. 2020, Living Rev. Rel., 23, 1, doi: 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0 136

  265. [284]

    D., Caprioli, D., Vurm, I., et al

    Metzger, B. D., Caprioli, D., Vurm, I., et al. 2016, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 457, 1786, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw123

  266. [285]

    D., Finzell, T., Vurm, I., et al

    Metzger, B. D., Finzell, T., Vurm, I., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 2739, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv742

  267. [286]

    D., Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, G., Darbha, S., et al

    Metzger, B. D., Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, G., Darbha, S., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 2650, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16864.x

  268. [287]

    R., Djorgovski, S

    Metzger, M. R., Djorgovski, S. G., Kulkarni, S. R., et al. 1997, Nature, 387, 878, doi: 10.1038/43132

  269. [288]

    2025, in Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, Vol

    Krawczyk, A., & Kotysz, K. 2025, in Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, Vol. 59, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, 167–172, doi: 10.22201/ia.14052059p.2025.59.26

  270. [289]

    M., Kaastra, J

    Miller, J. M., Kaastra, J. S., Miller, M. C., et al. 2015, Nature, 526, 542, doi: 10.1038/nature15708

  271. [290]

    M., Mockler, B., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., et al

    Miller, J. M., Mockler, B., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 953, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace03c

  272. [291]

    M., & Ramirez-Ruiz, E

    Mockler, B., Gallegos-Garcia, M., G¨ otberg, Y., Miller, J. M., & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 973, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad6c34

  273. [292]

    2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 872, 151, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab010f

    Mockler, B., Guillochon, J., & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 872, 151, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab010f

  274. [293]

    R., & Nicholl, M

    Mockler, B., Hammerstein, E., Coughlin, E. R., & Nicholl, M. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.14911, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.14911

  275. [294]

    2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 906, 101, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc955

    Mockler, B., & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 906, 101, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc955

  276. [295]

    A., Auchettl, K., et al

    Mockler, B., Twum, A. A., Auchettl, K., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 924, 70, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac35d5

  277. [296]

    P., Deller, A

    Mooley, K. P., Deller, A. T., Gottlieb, O., et al. 2018, Nature, 561, 355, doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0486-3

  278. [297]

    B., & Sakamoto, T

    Moss, M., Lien, A., Guiriec, S., Cenko, S. B., & Sakamoto, T. 2022, ApJ, 927, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4d94

  279. [298]

    Markwardt, C. B. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.03032, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.03032

  280. [299]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 2452, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3001

    Mummery, A., van Velzen, S., Nathan, E., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 2452, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3001

  281. [300]

    2022, Astrophys

    Murase, K. 2022, Astrophys. J. Lett., 941, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aca53c

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.