Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 43 references

Thermodynamics with thermodynamic variable first-passage time. I. From stochastic trajectories to nonlinear transport equations

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that first-passage time acts as a thermodynamic coordinate, that transport relaxation times equal its mean, and that memory kernels are renewal kernels derived from its statistics.

desk verdict A synthesis of FPT thermodynamics with Zubarev's method whose advertised derivations rest on an explicit ansatz, acknowledged in Appendix A, not on a derivation from the Liouville equation. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.24078 v1 pith:7FDVTPGL submitted 2026-07-27 cond-mat.stat-mech physics.data-an

V. V. Ryazanov This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.data-an MSC 82C0582C3182C70 PACS 05.70.Ln05.40.-a05.60.-k
keywords first-passagetimenonequilibriumthermodynamicvariablememorykernelrenewaltheorynonlineartransportequationsmetastablestatesrelaxationpotential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to make the random first-passage time—the moment a fluctuating trajectory first hits an absorbing boundary—into a legitimate macroscopic variable of nonequilibrium thermodynamics, not just a feature of single-particle random walks. It argues that once a metastable state's lifetime is included as a coordinate with its own conjugate force, the old problem of where relaxation times come from is solved: the constant relaxation time in finite-speed heat-conduction (Cattaneo-type) equations is strictly replaced by the state-dependent mean first-passage time, which makes the equations intrinsically nonlinear. It also claims that the abstract operator memory kernel of the nonequilibrium statistical operator method is exactly the scalar renewal kernel K(s)=sρ(s)/(1−ρ(s)) built from the frequency-domain transform of the first-passage-time density, giving parameter-free memory structure for non-Markovian transport. A sympathetic reader would care because this replaces phenomenological transport coefficients and memory kernels with quantities fixed by the lifetime statistics of the system, and it predicts power-law (fractional) memory and critical slowing down near phase transitions as consequences rather than ad hoc insertions.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the generalized thermodynamic potential Φ(γ) = −ln Z(γ), constructed as the negative log of the transform of the first-passage-time density; it functions as a free energy for the new 'lifetime–force' pair, with derivatives generating mean lifetime, variance, and higher moments. The load-bearing identity is the renewal kernel formula K(s)=sρ(s)/(1−ρ(s)), which the paper argues is the exact macroscopic closure of the operator memory kernel: all multiparticle flow information is 'encapsulated' inside the scalar lifetime distribution. The closure procedure uses thermodynamic consistency: the kinetic mean lifetime and the thermodynamic derivative ∂Φ/∂γ are required to coincid

What would settle it

In a molecular-dynamics or experimental study of a metastable fluid, measure both the first-passage-time (lifetime) distribution of the metastable state and the memory kernel of a heat flux; the two must satisfy K(s)=sρ(s)/(1−ρ(s)). A mismatch, or a kernel that depends on which flow is chosen while the lifetime distribution is fixed, would refute the claimed identity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that first-passage time is a fully-fledged macroscopic coordinate: a generalized distribution containing a random 'lifetime' of a metastable state defines a generalized potential Φ(γ) = −ln Z(γ), where Z is the transform of the lifetime density. The first derivative of Φ with respect to the conjugate force γ gives the macroscopic mean lifetime (the state coordinate); the second derivative gives its variance and higher-order fluctuations. From this, the author establishes two results. First, in the finite-speed (hyperbolic) heat-conduction equation, the constant relaxation time is replaced exactly by the mean first-passage time, so the transport coefficients inherit a dep

Load-bearing premise

The whole structure rests on the assumption, which the paper labels a functional closure rather than a derivation, that the dissipation of a many-particle system is exactly equivalent to the time statistics of a single scalar first-passage-time variable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Relaxation times in finite-speed transport equations are no longer empirical constants but state-dependent mean first-passage times, making the equations intrinsically nonlinear.
  • Memory kernels for non-Markovian transport are fully determined by the lifetime distribution, eliminating phenomenological kernels in viscoelasticity and anomalous diffusion.
  • Near critical points and spinodals, heavy-tailed lifetime distributions automatically generate power-law (fractional) memory kernels and thus fractional transport equations.
  • Lifetime fluctuations, computed from the second derivative of Φ, remain macroscopically significant; in the finite-channel example the standard deviation is about 82% of the mean, so the first-passage-time variable cannot be averaged away.
  • The thermodynamic consistency closure guarantees that measuring a system's mean lifetime determines the conjugate force and closes the transport equations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the identity K(s)=sρ(s)/(1−ρ(s)) is taken as a universal closure, it suggests a direct experimental test: measure the lifetime (first-passage) distribution of a metastable fluid and the transient decay of a heat or mass flux in the same system; the paper's claim implies the two must match exactly through this formula.
  • The single-scalar variable assumption may be the limiting step; for systems with several coupled transported quantities or multiple independent absorbing boundaries, a vector-valued lifetime or a matrix generalization of the potential would be needed, and the paper's ansatz would require extension.
  • The same potential structure could provide a thermodynamic definition of 'fragility' or 'stiffness' of a metastable state: the second derivative of Φ with respect to γ measures lifetime susceptibility, analogous to a heat capacity, and might be extractable from fluctuation data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a synthesis of extended irreversible thermodynamics (EIT), Zubarev's nonequilibrium statistical operator (NSO) method, and first-passage time (FPT) thermodynamics. It introduces a generalized Gibbs distribution containing the FPT as an independent thermodynamic coordinate, defines a generalized potential Φ(β,γ), and claims that the classical Maxwell-Cattaneo relaxation time is strictly replaced by the mean first-passage time, thereby generating internal macroscopic nonlinearity. It further claims to derive the exact structure of memory kernels in non-Markovian transport equations via renewal theory, giving K(s)=sρ(s)/(1−ρ(s)). A one-dimensional diffusion channel is worked out: the potential derived from the FPT Laplace transform reproduces ⟨T_fpt⟩=L²/2D and the variance L⁴/6D². The paper closes with a qualitative comparison of thermodynamic approaches.

Significance. If the central identification between Zubarev's operator memory kernel and the scalar renewal kernel were proven, the paper would provide a microscopic route to memory kernels and a state-dependent Maxwell-Cattaneo equation. The 1D channel calculation is internally correct and the renewal-kernel formula is standard, but the paper's headline claims are not established. Appendix A explicitly concedes that Eq. (A.3), the identity between K_Zub and K_ren, is a 'postulate' and a 'functional closure of the theory, not a pure consequence of the Liouville equations.' Because this identification is load-bearing for the memory-kernel derivation and the Maxwell-Cattaneo replacement, the paper's main results are conditional on an acknowledged ansatz rather than derived consequences. The paper also does not supply a microscopic derivation of the generalized Gibbs distribution or the entropy-production formula. These gaps prevent the claimed exactness and universality.

major comments (4)
  1. [Appendix A, Eq. (A.3)] The identity K_Zub(s)=K_ren(s)=sρ(s)/(1−ρ(s)) is the load-bearing result. Appendix A states verbatim that this is 'a consistent physical postulate (structural ansatz)' and 'a functional closure of the theory, not a pure consequence of the Liouville equations.' This directly contradicts the abstract and conclusions, where Eq. (21) is called 'exact' and a 'fundamental identity.' The FDR/Onsager arguments in Appendix A are asserted rather than proved, and no explicit reduction of the full 6N-dimensional Liouville operator to a scalar FPT coordinate is constructed for the multiparticle examples.
  2. [Section 4, Eq. (21)] The derivation of K(s)=sρ(s)/(1−ρ(s)) from the survival equation dP/dt=−∫K P is standard renewal algebra, but it presupposes that the macroscopic flux obeys a scalar renewal equation with the same kernel. The paper does not demonstrate that the operator memory kernel of Zubarev's NSO collapses to this scalar kernel in the full Liouville space. The 'quasi-stationarity' and 'single distinct process coordinate' conditions in Appendix A are not established for the multiparticle boiling and channel examples. Hence the replacement τ→⟨T_fpt⟩ in the Maxwell-Cattaneo equation inherits this gap.
  3. [Section 2, Eqs. (2)-(8)] The generalized Gibbs distribution (2) and potential (3) are introduced with γ as a thermodynamic force conjugate to T_fpt, but no microscopic derivation from the Hamiltonian or Liouville dynamics is given. The entropy production formula (8), σ=k_B γ d⟨T_fpt⟩/dt, is asserted without justification from the standard definition of entropy production in the NSO method. These are additional axioms, not consequences. The 1D channel calculation (Eqs. (10)-(14)) is internally consistent and recovers known results, but it only tests the Laplace-transform potential, not the NSO-to-renewal identification.
  4. [Section 3, closure procedure] The closure condition ⟨T_fpt⟩=∂Φ/∂γ determines γ through the potential, but since Φ is defined as the negative logarithm of the Laplace transform of the FPT density, this relation is an identity by construction. The resulting transport coefficients become functions of γ, and hence of ⟨T_fpt⟩, through this definition. The paper does not provide an independent physical criterion selecting this closure over other closures; the claimed 'nonlinearity' of the Maxwell-Cattaneo equation is therefore a consequence of the ansatz rather than a derived prediction.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The name 'Maxwell-Catteneo' is a typo for 'Maxwell-Cattaneo.'
  2. [Section 2, Eq. (10)-(12)] The notation ρ(γ), ρ(s), and ρ(t) is used without distinguishing the FPT probability density in time from its Laplace transform; this causes ambiguity in Eqs. (10), (21), and Appendix A.
  3. [References] Several reference entries contain typographical errors, e.g., 'Phusik' (Ref. 23), 'Sttutgart' (Ref. 15), and 'F . Y. M. Wan's' (Ref. 41).
  4. [Section 5, table and conclusions] Comparisons with other approaches are qualitative and do not cite quantitative benchmarks; the claim that TFPT 'mathematically proves' results of Ref. [27] should be substantiated in the present text rather than referring to the author's prior work.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The headline memory-kernel and Maxwell–Cattaneo results rest on an admitted postulate (Eq. A.3) and a same-author citation; the derivation of Eq. (21) is an algebraic identity once the renewal equation is assumed.

  1. self definitional [Section 4, Eq. (21); Appendix A derivation of Eq. (21)]
    "Let be P(t) the survival function... the evolution of the survival function is described by an integro-differential equation with a memory kernel K(t): dP(t)/dt = −∫ K(t−t′)P(t′)dt′. ... From here it is easy to express the Laplace image of the memory core: K(s)=sρ(s)/(1−ρ(s))."

    The kernel K is introduced as the coefficient in the renewal equation, and ρ is defined from the same survival function via ρ(s)=1−sP(s). Therefore K(s)=sρ(s)/(1−ρ(s)) is an algebraic identity, not a physical derivation. The claim that this gives the 'exact mathematical structure of transport memory kernels' is true by construction for the renewal kernel, but it does not establish that the Zubarev operator kernel obeys the scalar renewal equation. The load-bearing physical content is assumed when the scalar renewal equation is written for macroscopic fluxes.

  2. other [Appendix A, after Eq. (A.3)]
    "Thus, an operator mapping of the form (A.3) is introduced within the framework of the developed formalism as a consistent physical postulate (structural ansatz). This assumption of the article asserts the equivalence of the macroscopic dissipation of a multiparticle system and the time statistics of the stochastic random walks ... This is a functional closure of the theory, not a pure consequence of the Liouville equations."

    The paper's own concluding paragraph reduces the central identification K_Zub(s)=K_ren(s) to an unproved structural ansatz. Yet the abstract and conclusion present Eq. (21) as an 'exact mathematical structure of transport memory kernels' and a 'fundamental identity.' The headline result is therefore conditional on an admitted closure assumption, so what is called a derivation is in fact an input of the theory.

1 more flagged steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Section 4, 'Modified Maxwell-Cattaneo equation' paragraph; also Conclusion]
    "In Ref. [27] it is mathematically proven that extended nonequilibrium thermodynamics (EIT) maps onto the stochastic thermodynamics of Ref. [27], with the classical deterministic relaxation time τ strictly replaced by the mean first-passage time ⟨T_fpt⟩."

    The replacement τ→⟨T_fpt⟩ is the central premise of the Maxwell–Cattaneo result, but it is justified exclusively by citing the same author's prior work. That prior work is itself based on the FPT-as-thermodynamic-variable ansatz, which Appendix A admits is a functional closure rather than a consequence of the Liouville equations. The nonlinearity of the resulting Cattaneo equation is thus built into the choice of ⟨T_fpt⟩ as the relaxation time, not independently derived here.

full rationale

The paper is not wholly without independent content: the channel example is self-contained, derives ⟨T_fpt⟩ and its variance from the assumed FPT density, and matches the known Pontryagin-equation results; the renewal identity K(s)=sρ(s)/(1−ρ(s)) is also a known CTRW result, which the paper explicitly acknowledges. However, the two headline claims—the 'exact' memory-kernel structure and the replacement of the Maxwell–Cattaneo relaxation time by ⟨T_fpt⟩—are not independently established. The first reduces to a definitional identity once the scalar renewal equation is assumed for macroscopic fluxes, and the second is imported from a same-author citation whose own basis is the closure ansatz. The appendix's explicit admission that Eq. (A.3) is 'a functional closure of the theory, not a pure consequence of the Liouville equations' confirms that the claimed microscopic justification is an input rather than a derived output. This is partial circularity: the derivations are internally consistent but the central physical predictions are built in by construction, hence a score of 6 rather than a lower non-circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The derivation rests on a sequence of postulates: an extended Gibbs ensemble with a hand-added force γ; an asserted entropy-production formula; and — most critically — the identification of Zubarev's operator kernel with a scalar renewal kernel, which the appendix labels a structural ansatz. The channel example is the only calculational check, and it reproduces standard FPT results rather than testing the ansatz.

free parameters (1)
  • thermodynamic force γ
    Introduced by hand as a new intensive variable in the generalized Gibbs distribution (2)/(17). It is not fitted to data, but it is a hand-added parameter whose value is fixed only by the closure condition ⟨T_fpt⟩=∂Φ/∂γ, so it carries no independent predictive content.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption FPT is defined by first hitting an absorbing hypersurface ∂Ω; Dirichlet boundary condition f=0 on ∂Ω (Section 2).
    Standard FPT setup; for superheated liquid it is identified with max(R_i)=R_cr.
  • ad hoc to paper Generalized Gibbs distribution Z=∫ρ(E,T_fpt)e^{-βE-γT_fpt}dE dT_fpt (Eq. 2) and potential Φ=-ln Z (Eq. 3).
    This is the core extension of equilibrium statistical mechanics; no derivation from underlying dynamics is given.
  • ad hoc to paper Entropy production σ = k_B γ d⟨T_fpt⟩/dt (Eqs. 8, 16).
    Asserted by analogy with Zubarev; dimensions and sign conventions are not carefully justified.
  • ad hoc to paper Zubarev's infinitesimal parameter ε is replaced by γ(t) in the Liouville equation/NSO (Section 3).
    The modified NSO (17) is postulated; no limit or derivation is given.
  • ad hoc to paper Operator memory kernel of Zubarev NSO equals scalar renewal kernel (A.3)/(21).
    Explicitly called a 'structural ansatz' and 'functional closure ... not a pure consequence of the Liouville equations' in Appendix A; this is load-bearing for the paper's main claim.
  • domain assumption Bogolyubov timescale separation: macroscopic forces are quasi-stationary during microscopic fluctuations (Appendix A).
    Needed to justify the Laplace-factorization of kernel and forces.
  • domain assumption Onsager regression hypothesis and FDR of second kind (Kubo) are used to equate fluctuation and dissipation (Appendix A).
    Standard but unproven here; used to pass from flow correlators to FPT statistics.
  • ad hoc to paper Maxwell-Cattaneo relaxation time τ is replaced by ⟨T_fpt⟩ (Section 4).
    This identification is the paper's central result, but it is a definitional substitution, not a derived theorem.
invented entities (2)
  • thermodynamic force γ (conjugate to first-passage time)
    purpose: Added intensive variable that controls FPT statistics in the generalized ensemble and is eliminated by the closure condition; claimed to physically represent 'intensity of tendency to cross the boundary'.
    No independent measurement or falsifiable prediction is attached to γ; its value is set by the mean FPT through Eq. (5)/(18), so it is an internal bookkeeping variable.
  • first-passage time as macroscopic thermodynamic coordinate
    purpose: New state variable extending Gibbs thermodynamics; used to define averages, fluctuations, and entropy production.
    No experimental protocol is proposed to measure this variable independently of the model; its values come from model FPT distributions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermodynamics with thermodynamic variable first-passage time. I. From stochastic trajectories to nonlinear transport equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7FDVTPGL

@misc{pith2026260724078,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermodynamics with thermodynamic variable first-passage time. I. From stochastic trajectories to nonlinear transport equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7FDVTPGL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.24078}
}
read the original abstract

The theoretical foundation of combining external nonequilibrium thermodynamics, the nonequilibrium statistical operator method, and stochastic first passage time thermodynamics are explored. It is shown that including a random lifetime of a metastable state in the generalized distribution function allows the first passage time to be considered as a fully - fledged macroscopic coordinate. A microscopic justification for this approach is provided, and a generalized thermodynamic potential is introduced. A procedure for closing the transport equations based on on thermodynamic consistency conditions is developed. It is shown that in the generalized Maxwell - Catteneo equation, the classical relaxation time is strictly replaced by the mean first passage time, which imparts internal macroscopic nonlinearity to the system. Using renewal theory, the exact mathematical structure of transport memory kernels for non-Markovian processes is derived. A qualitative comparative analysis of various approaches to the thermodynamic description of nonequilibrium phenomena is presented.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    T. D. Donder, L’Affinitè (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, France, 1936)

    1936

  2. [2]

    Prigogine, Etude Thermodinamique des Phènomènes Irrèversibles (Desoer, Liege, Belgium, 1947)

    I. Prigogine, Etude Thermodinamique des Phènomènes Irrèversibles (Desoer, Liege, Belgium, 1947)

    1947

  3. [3]

    Onsager and S

    L. Onsager and S. Machlup, Phys. Rev. 9, 1505 (1953)

    1953

  4. [4]

    de Groot and P

    S. de Groot and P. Mazur, Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics (North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1962)

    1962

  5. [5]

    Glansdorff and I

    P. Glansdorff and I. Prigogine, Thermodynamic Theory of Structure, Stability, and Fluctuations (Wiley- Interscience. New York, USA, 1971)

    1971

  6. [6]

    Truesdell, Rational Thermodynamics (McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 1985) [second enlarged edition (Springer, Berlin, Germany)] (1988)]

    C. Truesdell, Rational Thermodynamics (McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 1985) [second enlarged edition (Springer, Berlin, Germany)] (1988)]

    1985

  7. [7]

    D. Jou, J. Casas-Vazquez and G. Lebon, Extended Irreversible Thermodynamics (Springer, Berlin , 1993), First edition. Second edition (1996). Third edition (2001). Fourth edition (2010)

    1993

  8. [8]

    Lebon, D

    G. Lebon, D. Jou, J. Casas-Vázquez, Understanding Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics, Foundations, Applications, Frontiers (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008)

    2008

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    R. V. Velasco, and L. S. García-Colín, J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn. 18, 157 (1993)

    1993

  2. [10]

    Gyarmati, J

    I. Gyarmati, J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn. 2, 233-260 (1977)

    1977

  3. [11]

    Grmela, Phys

    M. Grmela, Phys. Rev. E, 48:2, 919–930 (1993)

    1993

  4. [12]

    Seifert, The European Physical Journal B, 64 (3–4): 423–431 (2008); arXiv:0710.1187

    U. Seifert, The European Physical Journal B, 64 (3–4): 423–431 (2008); arXiv:0710.1187

    2008 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Hobson, J

    A. Hobson, J. Chem. Phys. 45, 1352 (1966)

    1966

  6. [14]

    L. S. Garcia-Colin, Á. R. Vasconcellos and R. Luzzi, J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn. 19, 24 (1994)

    1994

  7. [15]

    Luzzi, Á

    R. Luzzi, Á. R. Vasconcellos and J. G. Ramos, Statistical Foundations of Irreversible Thermodynamics (Teubner-Bertelsmann Springer, Sttutgart, Germany, 2000)

    2000

  8. [16]

    Luzzi, Á

    R. Luzzi, Á. R. Vasconcellos and J. G. Ramos, La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento, 29:2, 1–82 (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    Luzzi, Á

    R. Luzzi, Á. R. Vasconcellos and J. G. Ramos, et al. Theor. Math. Phys. 194, 4 -29 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/

    2018

  10. [18]

    D. N. Zubarev, Non-equilibrium statistical thermodynamics. Plenum-Consultants Bureau, New York, USA (1974)

    1974

  11. [19]

    D. N. Zubarev, V. Morozov and G. Röpke, Statistical Mechanics of Non-equilibrium Processes: Basic Concepts, Kinetic Theory, (Akademie-Wiley VCH, Berlin, Germany, Vol. 1, 1996)

    1996

  12. [20]

    D. N. Zubarev, V. Morozov and G. Röpke, Statistical Mechanics of Non -equilibrium Processes: Relaxation and Hydrodynamic Processes, (Akademie-Wiley VCH, Berlin, Germany, Vol. 2, 1997)

    1997

  13. [21]

    D. N. Zubarev, in Reviews of Science and Technology: Modern Problems of Mathematics. Vol.15, 131- 226, (in Russian) ed. by R. B. Gamkrelidze (Nauka, Moscow, 1980) [English Transl.: J. Soviet Math. 16, 1509-1571 (1981)]

    1980

  14. [22]

    Röpke, Nonequilibrium Statistical Operator

    G. Röpke, Nonequilibrium Statistical Operator. In: Non-Equilibrium Particle Dynamics; Kim A.S., Ed.; Intech Open: London, UK (2019); ISBN 978-1-83968-079-3, doi:10.5772/intechopen.84707

    2019 doi

  15. [23]

    V. V. Ryazanov, Fortschritte der Phusik/Progress of Physics. 49, N8-9, 885-893 (2001)

    2001

  16. [24]

    V. V. Ryazanov, Eur. Phys. J. B, 94, 242 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00246-0

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    V. V. Ryazanov, S. G. Shpyrko, Condensed Matter Physics, 9, 1(45), 71-80 (2006)

    2006

  18. [26]

    V. V. Ryazanov, European Physical Journal B. 72, 629–639 (2009). 27 V. V. Ryazanov, Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics. — 2024. — Vol. 36, No. 6. — P. 1493–

    2009

  19. [28]

    Metzler, G

    First-Passage Phenomena and Their Applications, edited by R. Metzler, G. Oshanin, and S. Redner (World Scientific, Singapore, 2014) 608 p

    2014

  20. [29]

    Masoliver, Random Processes: First-Passage and Escape (World Scientific, Singapore, 2018) 388 р

    J. Masoliver, Random Processes: First-Passage and Escape (World Scientific, Singapore, 2018) 388 р

    2018

  21. [30]

    V. V. Ryazanov, Journal of thermodynamics , Volume 2011, Article ID 203203, 10 pages (2011). doi:10.1155/2011/203203

    2011 doi

  22. [31]

    V. V. Ryazanov, Journal of Thermodynamics , Vol. 2012, Article ID 318032, 5 pages (2012). doi:10.1155/2012/318032

    2012 doi

  23. [32]

    B. B. Markiv, I. P. Omelyan, M. V. Tokarchuk, Condensed Matter Physics, 12(4), 573–580 (2009)

    2009

  24. [33]

    M. C. Schwarzwälder, Non -Fourier Heat Conduction. The Maxwell -Cattaneo Equations, Master's Degree Thesis (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Facultat de Matemàtiques i Estadística, 2015)

    2015

  25. [34]

    Metzler, J

    R. Metzler, J. Klafter, Physics Reports , Volume 339, Issue 1 , December, Pages 1-77 (2000)

    2000

  26. [35]

    Barkai, R

    E. Barkai, R. Metzler, and J. Klafter, Phys. Rev. E 61, 132 (2000)

    2000

  27. [36]

    Seifert, Stochastic Thermodynamics (Cambridge University Press, 2025)

    U. Seifert, Stochastic Thermodynamics (Cambridge University Press, 2025)

    2025

  28. [37]

    Seifert, Reports on Progress in Physics, 75(12), 126001 (2012)

    U. Seifert, Reports on Progress in Physics, 75(12), 126001 (2012)

    2012

  29. [38]

    Seifert, The European Physical Journal B, 64(3), 423-431 (2005)

    U. Seifert, The European Physical Journal B, 64(3), 423-431 (2005)

    2005

  30. [39]

    Jarzynski, Physical Review Letters, 78(14), 2690 (1997)

    C. Jarzynski, Physical Review Letters, 78(14), 2690 (1997)

    1997

  31. [40]

    G. E. Crooks, Physical Review E, 60(3), 2721 (1999)

    1999

  32. [41]

    H . C. Tuckwell and F . Y. M. Wan's, Journal of Applied Probability , 21(4) (1984) DOI: 10.2307/3213688

    1984 doi

  33. [42]

    Raghu and I, Neri, New Journal of Physics, 27, 124602 (2025) DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/ae249e

    A. Raghu and I, Neri, New Journal of Physics, 27, 124602 (2025) DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/ae249e

    2025 doi

  34. [43]

    Wardak, J

    A. Wardak, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53, 375001. DOI 10.1088/1751-8121/ab8b37 (2020)

    2020 doi

  35. [1513]

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-024-01311-6. 31

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.