Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 81 references

Public Gaia flags, cleaned IR excess and variability turn up 990 unresolved binary candidates among crowded-field M dwarfs that already have good single-star astrometry.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 12:47 UTC pith:VYTZYR5H

load-bearing objection Useful public candidate list and caveated lower-limit fraction for unresolved M-dwarf binaries in a crowded bulge tile, but the headline 13–14.9% numbers rest heavily on two Gaia cuts whose false-positive rates are not bounded in this field. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.24510 v1 pith:VYTZYR5H submitted 2026-07-27 astro-ph.SR

Identification of unresolved binaries in the VVV b294 tile: A Pro-Am collaboration using the Virtual Observatory

classification astro-ph.SR
keywords surveysvirtual observatory toolsastrometrystars: binaries: generalstars: binaries: closestars: low-massM dwarfsVVV survey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that unresolved companions to M dwarfs can still be found even after a strict RUWE cut that was meant to keep only clean single-star solutions. Working in the dense VVV b294 tile toward the Galactic bulge, the authors combine Gaia statistical indicators, infrared excess cleaned by visual Pro-Am inspection, photometric variability and literature cross-matches. They recover 990 candidates plus 43 known binaries (13 percent of the parent catalogue, 14.9 percent in the best-covered subregion), including systems whose secondaries may be brown dwarfs. Nearby Gaia neighbours prove to have only a small effect on the adopted cuts, so the same selection logic used in the solar neighbourhood still works in crowded fields. The result supplies a practical lower-limit close-binary fraction and a ready list of 120 strong targets for follow-up.

Core claim

Among 7925 M dwarfs within 500 pc that already satisfy RUWE < 1.4, a multi-tracer search recovers 990 unresolved binary candidates and 43 previously known binaries (five of them possible triples), corresponding to 13 percent of the full catalogue and 14.9 percent in the homogeneously covered GLIMPSE+OGLE region; binary SED fits for 98 systems with infrared excess indicate that nearly half the secondaries may be substellar, and 95 percent of the candidates with measured tangential velocities belong to the young disc.

What carries the argument

A multi-tracer binarity filter: Gaia DR3 flags (especially ipd_frac_multi_peak > 30 and the G8 excess-noise combination), infrared excess retained only after Pro-Am visual cleaning of GLIMPSE counterparts, photometric-variability indicators, and literature cross-matches. The filter is applied after the parent sample has already been restricted to RUWE < 1.4.

Load-bearing premise

A positive flag under these cuts is assumed to trace a physically bound unresolved companion more often than residual field contamination, stellar activity, processing artefacts or chance alignments.

What would settle it

High-resolution imaging or multi-epoch spectroscopy of the 120 strong candidates that either confirms bound companions at the predicted separations and flux ratios or shows that the majority of the flags are false positives.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The same public-data cuts remain usable in dense bulge and plane fields, not only in the solar neighbourhood.
  • A ready list of 120 high-priority unresolved M-dwarf binary candidates is available for adaptive-optics or spectroscopic follow-up.
  • Nearly half of the IR-excess systems may host L or T secondaries, expanding the census of substellar companions at larger distances.
  • The recovered 13–15 percent fraction is a firm lower limit on the close multiplicity of M dwarfs toward the Galactic plane once RUWE-selected samples are examined.
  • Five known eclipsing or ellipsoidal binaries that also carry astrometric flags become candidate triple systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the false-positive rate among the strong candidates is low, the true close-binary fraction in this mass range and environment is closer to the 20 percent values reported for nearby M dwarfs than the raw 15 percent recovery suggests.
  • The method can be re-run automatically on future Gaia releases and other VVV tiles to map how unresolved multiplicity varies with Galactic latitude and stellar density.
  • Systems with secondaries cooler than ~2000 K are natural targets for JWST or ELT atmospheric characterisation once distances and luminosities are confirmed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper searches the Cruz et al. (2023, PC) catalogue of 7925 M dwarfs within 500 pc in the VVV b294 tile (all pre-selected to RUWE<1.4) for unresolved binary signatures using public data only: Gaia DR3 statistical flags (criteria G3-G8, substituting G8 — a combined ipd_gof_harmonic_amplitude, astrometric_excess_noise>1.4 mas, and excess_noise_sig>2 cut — for the RUWE-based criteria the catalogue cut removes), IR-excess SEDs cleaned by a Pro-Am visual inspection campaign, photometric variability from VVV and Gaia, and literature cross-matches (SIMBAD, WDS, OGLE). The authors report 990 binary candidates plus 43 known binaries (13% of the catalogue; 14.9% in the GLIMPSE+OGLE subregion with homogeneous coverage), 120 "strong" candidates with at least two independent flags, VOSA binary SED fits for 98 IR-excess systems with secondaries extending into the L/T regime, and young-disc kinematics for ~95% of candidates with tangential velocities. A Mann-Whitney test on candidates with vs. without Gaia neighbors within 2 arcsec (and separately within 1 arcsec) is used to argue that crowding does not materially affect the adopted parameter cuts. The 13-14.9% figure is framed as a maximum recoverable fraction given the methodology, with a 2-2.3% floor from known plus strong candidates.

Significance. If the candidate list holds up, this is the first observational estimate of the unresolved M-dwarf binary fraction toward the Galactic bulge, extending multiplicity work from the usual 10-50 pc volume-complete samples out to 500 pc in a crowded field. Concrete strengths: the full methodology uses only public data and VO tools and is explicitly designed to be reusable; the catalogue is released through SVO/VizieR with cone-search access; the IR-excess classifications rest on 5750 independent visual inspections by five to six classifiers each with a documented consensus rule (Appendix A); and the authors quantify their own incompleteness (RUWE pre-cut, partial GLIMPSE/OGLE coverage, astrometric blindness to EBs, illustrated by the fact that only 5 of 43 known binaries satisfy any Gaia criterion). The comparison with Cifuentes et al. (2025) (12.6% in the solar vicinity) and the honest bracketing of the fraction (2-2.3% floor, 13-14.9% ceiling) are useful. However, the upper end of the bracket — the number most likely to be quoted — currently rests on two Gaia flags whose faint-end and crowding false-positive rates are conceded but not quantified, which limits the paper's quantitative,

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2 (criterion G8) / Section 5.2] The G8 excess-noise threshold is a single magnitude-independent value (1.4 mas, derived as mean+sigma of the median values across magnitudes in Table 4 of Lindegren et al. 2021). That same table gives typical single-star excess noise of 0.976 mas at G=19 and 1.801 mas at G=20, so at the faint end of the sample the cut sits at or below the typical value for ordinary single stars, and G8 (431 stars, jointly with G3 the dominant contributor to the 990 candidates) will flag a substantial fraction of faint single stars by construction. The excess_noise_sig>2 requirement mitigates this only partially, since sig is a formal-error ratio and the 1.4 mas floor remains absolute. The manuscript concedes the symptom (Section 5.2: candidates skew faint; 'some level of contamination is expected to remain') but never quantifies it. This is load-bearing for the headline 13%/14.9% fractions and for the co
  2. [Section 5.1 (Mann-Whitney validation)] The validation test compares the 504 candidates with a Gaia neighbor within 2 arcsec against the 486 without, and finds small effect sizes. This demonstrates that resolved neighbors do not drive the flags, but it cannot detect the two contamination modes that matter most: (a) noise-driven G8 positives at faint magnitudes (see previous comment), which occur regardless of neighbors, and (b) chance alignments below Gaia resolution, which are expected in a field with ~2.2e6 VVV sources per square degree and are a documented failure mode of ipd_frac_multi_peak (the paper itself cites Medan & Lepine 2023 for G3). The conclusion that 'the application of lower limits... has been proven to be still valid in dense fields' (Section 6) is therefore stronger than the test supports. The test should either be supplemented (e.g., a control sample of non-candidates at matched magnitudes, or the expected
  3. [Abstract / Section 4.5 / Section 6] The 990 candidates and the 13% figure are presented as the lead results, while the caveats that determine their reliability (faint-end noise contamination, G3 chance alignments, the fact that only 5 of 43 known binaries satisfy any Gaia criterion) appear only in Sections 5.2-5.5. Given the quantitative concerns above, the abstract and Section 6 should carry the essential qualification: that 13% (14.9%) is an upper envelope under the assumption that all flagged stars are binaries, with a plausible contamination fraction that the new magnitude-binned analysis should bound, and that the confirmed-plus-strong-candidate floor is 2-2.3%. Section 5.5 does interpret the fraction as 'the maximum close binary fraction recoverable with this methodology', but this framing is absent from the abstract.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 4.1 / Section 5.5] 153 sources are flagged inconclusive ('I') after visual inspection and dropped from the candidate pool. The multiplicity-fraction discussion (Section 5.5) lists several incompleteness channels but does not mention this one; it should be included for completeness, even if the effect is small.
  2. [Section 4.5 vs Section 6] The count of known binaries is given as 43 in Section 4.5 but as 42 (plus one RS CVn) in Section 6; Table 2 and the surrounding text should be reconciled. Relatedly, Table 2's column labels (IR, G3, ..., SVar, SBin) are cryptic without cross-referencing the text; a brief definition row or footnote would help.
  3. [Section 5.4 vs Abstract] Section 5.5 states 'at least one third lie at the substellar regime' based on 32 M+T systems out of 98, while the abstract says 'nearly half may be substellar' (counting the 19 M+L systems). Both statements are defensible but should be tied explicitly to their respective assumptions so readers do not conflate them.
  4. [Figure 5] Figure 5 caption: 'Solid line and filled bars stand for binary candidates with and without more than one Gaia counterpart within 2 arcsec' is ambiguous (solid line for the first sample, filled bars for the second?). Please clarify which graphical element corresponds to which sample.
  5. [Various] Typographical: 'spectophotometric' (Sections 2, Table 3 note); '1,arcsec' (Section 5.1); 'were they spread' should be 'where they spread' (Section 5.3); 'fulfills criterion G3' vs 'fulfill' inconsistencies; a run-on in the author list ('Rias Baixas, Pontevedra, Spain8Asociacion Astronomica de Mallorca') missing a line break; 'There are3+2binaries' and '1,arcsec' spacing issues (Sections 5.3, 5.1).
  6. [Section 3.2] The derivation of the 1.4 mas value ('average plus standard deviation of the median values in Table 4 of Lindegren et al. 2021') mixes medians from G=16 to G=20 into one number; showing the actual arithmetic (which magnitudes enter, and the resulting value) would make the choice auditable, particularly given its centrality to criterion G8.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Observational candidate count under stated external cuts; no derivation that reduces to its inputs by construction.

full rationale

The paper’s central results are direct tallies: stars in the prior PC M-dwarf sample that meet at least one of a stated set of Gaia flags, cleaned IR-excess, variability, or literature labels, yielding 990 candidates + 43 known binaries (13%; 14.9% in the GLIMPSE+OGLE subregion). That percentage is the ratio of selected objects to the parent catalogue under explicit cuts, not a quantity forced by fitting a parameter and re-predicting a related observable, nor by a uniqueness theorem. G3–G7 thresholds are taken from published Gaia-based criteria (Cifuentes et al. 2025); G8’s 1.4 mas excess-noise floor is defined from Lindegren et al. (2021) Table 4 medians, an external reference. The neighbor-contamination check is an independent Mann–Whitney comparison, and binary SED fits are standard VOSA/BT-Settl model matching. Mild self-reference exists only in using the authors’ own PC catalogue as the input sample and group-adjacent criteria papers—normal catalogue reuse, not load-bearing circular derivation. Correctness concerns about magnitude-independent G8 false positives or crowding-driven G3 hits are selection-bias issues, not circularity. Score 1 for that minor non-load-bearing self-dependence; steps empty of true circular reductions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The result is a multi-criterion observational selection on public catalogues. Load-bearing ingredients are adopted Gaia/photometric thresholds, the assumption that cleaned IR excess and IPD/excess-noise flags trace bound companions, BT-Settl SED models, and kinematic population boundaries from prior work—not new dynamical laws or free cosmological parameters.

free parameters (7)
  • astrometric_excess_noise threshold (1.4 mas) in criterion G8 = 1.4 mas
    Set as average plus std of Lindegren et al. (2021) median values for G=16–20, and used as the main substitute for RUWE cuts; directly controls a large fraction of candidates.
  • ipd_frac_multi_peak threshold (G3) = >30
    Adopted cut >30 from Cifuentes-style criteria; alone flags ~7% of the sample.
  • ipd_gof_harmonic_amplitude threshold = >0.1
    Cut >0.1 combined with excess-noise significance in G8; literature-inherited free selection boundary.
  • Visual-inspection consensus fraction = ≥60%
    IR-excess stars kept as Y/C only if ≥60% of 5–6 inspectors agree; directly sets the 98 clean IR-excess systems.
  • VOSA binary-fit Vgf_b acceptance = Vgf_b <15 (with 3 kept to 24)
    Systems retained for secondary Teff discussion with Vgf_b up to ~24 (nominal good-fit guide ≲12–15).
  • Young-disc v_tan upper limit = 24 km/s
    24 km/s used to assign 95% of kinematically usable candidates to τ≲1 Ga (Leggett/Cortés-Contreras medians).
  • Strong-candidate rule (≥2 independent True flags) = ≥2 flags
    Hand-defined combination of IR, G3, G6, G8, and merged variability flags that selects the highlighted 120 systems.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Gaia IPD multi-peak, excess noise, and related statistics are useful tracers of unresolved or marginally resolved companions even when RUWE<1.4.
    Core of Sections 3.2 and 5.1; imported from Fabricius/Cifuentes/Lindegren and tested only via neighbor Mann–Whitney comparisons, not via orbital confirmation.
  • domain assumption After multi-inspector rejection of contaminated GLIMPSE matches, mid-IR SED excess is emission from a cooler bound companion rather than residual mismatch or extended dust.
    Section 3.1 and 5.4; underpins the 98 binary SED fits and substellar-secondary fraction.
  • domain assumption BT-Settl CIFIST solar-metallicity models with stated Teff/log g/AV grids adequately decompose unresolved M+M/L/T SEDs at VVV+Gaia+GLIMPSE wavelengths.
    Section 5.4 VOSA binary fits; secondary Teff and M+L/T counts inherit model systematics.
  • domain assumption Photometric variability (VVV χ² classes, Gaia VARIABLE flag, SIMBAD/OGLE variables) is allowable as a binarity prior even though activity and spots can mimic it.
    Section 3.3; authors note nature is unconfirmed but still fold variability into strong-candidate logic.
  • domain assumption Tangential-velocity population boundaries from Leggett (1992) and Cortés-Contreras et al. (2024) correctly map thin/young-disc membership without radial velocities.
    Section 5.2; supports the 95% young-disc statement.
  • domain assumption Standard catalogue crossmatch radii (e.g. 1 arcsec to SIMBAD/OGLE/WDS/GLIMPSE) identify the correct physical counterparts in this crowded field.
    Sections 3.4 and 4; crowding is the central observational risk the Pro-Am step tries to mitigate.
  • standard math Mann–Whitney comparisons of parameter distributions with vs without Gaia neighbors bound the practical contamination of the selection cuts.
    Section 5.1 non-parametric test; used to claim cuts remain valid under crowding.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-grok45-kimik3 · 25632 in / 4187 out tokens · 74236 ms · 2026-07-31T12:47:14.706139+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Stellar binaries and multiples are common objects. Their identification and characterization are primarily limited by the angular resolution of current instrumentation, survey depth and dynamic range. Towards the Galactic plane, stellar crowding further complicates these studies. We aim to identify unresolved binaries with good astrometric solutions and M dwarf primaries in the b294 field from the Vista Variables in the V\'ia L\'actea (VVV) survey using publicly available data. We examine the catalogue of M dwarfs within 500 pc in the b294 tile, employing binarity tracers based on statistical parameters from Gaia Data Release 3, multi-band photometry, and information in the literature. We reassess the astrometric and photometric parameters typically used for binary detection, establishing new boundaries and validating existing ones in the dense stellar field examined. We compare these results with those obtained in the solar vicinity. We present 990 unresolved binary candidates and 43 previously known binaries, including five possible triple systems. These represent the 13\% of the catalogue, rising to 14.9\% in well-covered regions. Binary-model SED fitting yields effective temperatures for 98 primary stars, with the properties of their secondary candidates indicating that nearly half may be substellar objects. We select 120 of the most promising binary candidates. Tangential velocities, where calculated, place 95\% of the studied binary candidates within the young disc population (tau <= 1 Ga). We demonstrate that the influence of nearby Gaia detections on the statistical parameters is small, allowing constraints similar to those that are applied in less crowded regions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.24510 by A. Elbaz-Sanz, A. Ginard, A. Romar, C. Cagigal-Olay, C. Morales-Socorro, E. M. Nicola, E. Solano, G. Gurrea-Ysasi, J. A. Cano D\'iez, J. C. Mora, J. E. Donate Lucas, J. Gonz\'alez-Edo, J. L. Navarro, J. M. Espinosa Gallardo, J. M. Perales, M. A. Almela Rubert, M. Cort\'es-Contreras, M. Zamora Rodr\'iguez, N. Echevarria Sainz-Ezquerra, P. Cruz, P. L'Huillier Seguel, R. Benavides Palencia, S. Langa, T. Poyato Romero, V. Pallares-L\'opez.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The sky distribution of the sample of 7 925 M dwarfs in the b294 tile is shown in red. The shadowed area corresponds to the VVV coverage [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Distribution of effective temperatures obtained for the input sample. The used grid of models has a step in temperature of 100 K, which was adopted here as the bin size. 2 SAMPLE We use as input the sample of 7 925 M dwarfs identified in Cruz et al. (2023) in the b294 tile of the VVV survey (Minniti et al. (2010, 2018)), hereafter the PC catalogue. The sample includes stars located within 500 pc from the S… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Aladin sky view with the 2MASS colour image as a background. Red dots and green circles stand for the M dwarfs in the PC catalogue and the 1228 stars with IR excess, respectively. Orange-shaded region represent the MOC coverage of GLIMPSE. (WDS, Mason et al. 2001) and with several catalogues from the OGLE project (Paczynski 1986; Udalski et al. 1993), in order to identify known systems that may not be full… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distribution of angular separations of the closest Gaia counterpart for the binary candidates (grey) and other Gaia detections within 2 arcsec (black). Moreover, within our binary sample we flag the strongest binary candidates by requiring them to present at least two True flags out of those defined above. For this task, we combine the 47 stars with “𝜒 2 ” variability flag with the seven stars with Gaia va… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Distributions of the astrometric_excess_noise, ipd_frac_multi_peak, ipd_gof_harmonic_amplitude and RUWE parameters. Solid line and filled bars stand for binary candidates with and without more than one Gaia counterpart within 2 arcsec, respectively. Yellow bars represent the sample of known binaries. MNRAS 000, 1–14 (2026) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Sky distribution of the 870 binary candidates (blue circles), the 120 strong candidates (magenta rhombs), and the 43 known binaries (orange squares), respectively. The 7 925 M dwarfs of the sample are displayed with gray pluses. 98 stars with an IR excess in their photometric SEDs obtained with VOSA in Cruz et al. (2023). For them, we perform a binary model fit of their SEDs using VOSA, aiming at character… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distribution of effective temperatures (top) and distances (middle) obtained from Cruz et al. 2023, and Gaia’s 𝐺 band magnitudes (bottom). these parameters can still provide signs of the presence of an unresolved wider companion, turning the system into a triple: there are 3 + 2 binaries with ipd_frac_multi_peak > 30 and astrometric_excess_noise > 1.4, respectively. They are listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:fig… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Aladin sky view of the three potentially resolved companions: Gaia DR3 4063009066137457792, Gaia DR3 4063058101640048512, and Gaia DR3 4063295871084813568 from left to right. Magenta reticle shows the target position and the Gaia detections are represented with red squares over the VVV DR4 colour image displayed in the background [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Tangential velocity vs. distance. Color code is the same as in pre￾vious figures. Solid, dashed, dot-dashed and dotted black lines represent the mean values of 𝑣tan of the young, thin, thick-thin, and thick discs populations from Cortés-Contreras et al. 2024. Pecaut & Mamajek (2013) 5 . According to this, there are 47, 19 and 32 M+M, M+L and M+T systems, respectively. This implies that at least one third l… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Top: Example of SED binary fitting using VOSA. Blue and red filled circles represent the synthetic photometric calculated from the best-fit model and the observed photometry, respectively. Grey and blue solid lines show the stellar observed and modeled SED of the composed system, while cyan and purple solid lines represent the modeled stellar SED of the primary and secondary components, respectively. MNRA… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Summary of the variability processing and analysis

    Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the variability processing and analysis. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244242 , archivePrefix =. 2206.06416 , primaryClass =

  2. [2]

    Multiplicity from close spectroscopic binaries to ultra-wide systems

    CARMENES input catalogue of M dwarfs: IX. Multiplicity from close spectroscopic binaries to ultra-wide systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452527 , archivePrefix =. 2412.12264 , primaryClass =

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    M dwarf stars in the b294 field from the VISTA Variables in the V \' a L \'a ctea (VVV). , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad353 , archivePrefix =. 2301.13491 , primaryClass =

  4. [4]

    A reference tool for identification of astronomical sources

    The ALADIN interactive sky atlas. A reference tool for identification of astronomical sources. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/aas:2000331 , adsurl =

  5. [5]

    Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV , year = 2005, series =

    TOPCAT STIL: Starlink Table/VOTable Processing Software. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV , year = 2005, series =

  6. [6]

    Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV , year = 2006, editor =

    STILTS - A Package for Command-Line Processing of Tabular Data. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV , year = 2006, editor =

  7. [7]

    The CDS reference database for astronomical objects

    The SIMBAD astronomical database. The CDS reference database for astronomical objects. , eprint =. doi:10.1051/aas:2000332 , adsurl =

  8. [8]

    Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXI , year = 2012, editor =

    The CDS Cross-Match Service. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXI , year = 2012, editor =

  9. [9]

    Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXVII , year = 2020, editor =

    The CDS Cross-match Service: Key Figures, Internals and Future Plans. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXVII , year = 2020, editor =

  10. [10]

    , eprint =

    The VizieR database of astronomical catalogues. , eprint =. doi:10.1051/aas:2000169 , adsurl =

  11. [11]

    VizieR Online Data Catalog: GLIMPSE Source Catalog (I + II + 3D) (IPAC 2008)

  12. [12]

    An application to the Collinder 69 open cluster

    VOSA: virtual observatory SED analyzer. An application to the Collinder 69 open cluster. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810395 , archivePrefix =. 0808.0270 , primaryClass =

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    The Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) for the Spitzer Space Telescope. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/422843 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0405616 , primaryClass =

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Classification of OGLE Eclipsing Binary Stars Based on Their Morphology Type with Locally Linear Embedding. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac082c , archivePrefix =. 2106.01039 , primaryClass =

  15. [15]

    Contact Binaries in OGLE-I Database

    Contact Binaries in OGLE-I Database. , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0110314 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0110314 , primaryClass =

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Search for Long-Period and Non-Periodic Variable Stars in the OGLE-I Databases. , keywords =

  17. [17]

    The OGLE-III Catalog of Variable Stars

    The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. The OGLE-III Catalog of Variable Stars. XV. Long-Period Variables in the Galactic Bulge. , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1304.2787 , archivePrefix =. 1304.2787 , primaryClass =

  18. [18]

    Over 450 000 Eclipsing and Ellipsoidal Binary Systems Toward the Galactic Bulge

    The OGLE Collection of Variable Stars. Over 450 000 Eclipsing and Ellipsoidal Binary Systems Toward the Galactic Bulge. , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1701.03105 , archivePrefix =. 1701.03105 , primaryClass =

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    Gravitational Microlensing by the Galactic Halo. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/164140 , adsurl =

  20. [20]

    Discovery of the First Candidate Microlensing Event in the Direction of the Galactic Bulge

    The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Discovery of the First Candidate Microlensing Event in the Direction of the Galactic Bulge. , keywords =

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    Exploring Thousands of Nearby Hierarchical Systems with Gaia and Speckle Interferometry. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acc464 , adsurl =

  22. [22]

    Gaia scan-angle-dependent signals and spurious periods

    Gaia Data Release 3. Gaia scan-angle-dependent signals and spurious periods. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245353 , archivePrefix =. 2212.11971 , primaryClass =

  23. [23]

    Detecting New Visual Binaries in Gaia DR3 with Gaia and Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) Photometry. I. New Candidate Binaries within 200 pc of the Sun. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acffb0 , archivePrefix =. 2310.02256 , primaryClass =

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    Gaia DR3 detectability of unresolved binary systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450172 , archivePrefix =. 2404.14127 , primaryClass =

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    New companions to nearby low-mass stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts382 , adsurl =

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    Lucky Imaging survey for southern M dwarf binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014114 , archivePrefix =. 1006.2377 , primaryClass =

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    The AstraLux Large M-dwarf Multiplicity Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/754/1/44 , archivePrefix =. 1205.4718 , primaryClass =

  28. [28]

    Catalogue validation

    Gaia Early Data Release 3. Catalogue validation. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039834 , archivePrefix =. 2012.06242 , primaryClass =

  29. [29]

    The astrometric solution

    Gaia Early Data Release 3. The astrometric solution. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039709 , archivePrefix =. 2012.03380 , primaryClass =

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    Astrometric excess noise in Gaia EDR3 and the search for X-ray binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3771 , archivePrefix =. 2201.00833 , primaryClass =

  31. [31]

    The TESS Ten Thousand Catalog: 10,001 uniformly-vetted and -validated Eclipsing Binary Stars detected in Full-Frame Image data by machine learning and analyzed by citizen scientists

    The TESS Ten Thousand Catalog: 10,001 uniformly-vetted and -validated Eclipsing Binary Stars detected in Full-Frame Image data by machine learning and analyzed by citizen scientists. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.05631 , archivePrefix =. 2506.05631 , primaryClass =

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Parallax Systematics and Photocenter Motions of Benchmark Eclipsing Binaries in Gaia EDR3. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abdaad , archivePrefix =. 2101.03425 , primaryClass =

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    Gaia's binary star renaissance. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.newar.2024.101694 , archivePrefix =. 2403.12146 , primaryClass =

  34. [34]

    Ellipsoidal variables with possible black hole or neutron star secondaries

    Gaia Data Release 3. Ellipsoidal variables with possible black hole or neutron star secondaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243626 , archivePrefix =. 2206.06032 , primaryClass =

  35. [35]

    The second Gaia catalogue of long-period variable candidates

    Gaia Data Release 3. The second Gaia catalogue of long-period variable candidates. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244241 , archivePrefix =. 2206.05745 , primaryClass =

  36. [36]

    The first Gaia catalogue of eclipsing-binary candidates

    Gaia Data Release 3. The first Gaia catalogue of eclipsing-binary candidates. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245330 , archivePrefix =. 2211.00929 , primaryClass =

  37. [37]

    Validating the classification of variable young stellar object candidates

    Gaia Data Release 3. Validating the classification of variable young stellar object candidates. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244101 , archivePrefix =. 2206.05796 , primaryClass =

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    Bayesian Analysis to Identify New Star Candidates in Nearby Young Stellar Kinematic Groups. , keywords =. 2013. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/88 , archivePrefix =

  39. [39]

    BANYAN. II. Very Low Mass and Substellar Candidate Members to Nearby, Young Kinematic Groups with Previously Known Signs of Youth. , keywords =. 2014. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/121 , archivePrefix =

  40. [40]

    Kinematics in the solar neighbourhood

    CARMENES input catalogue of M dwarfs: VIII. Kinematics in the solar neighbourhood. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451585 , archivePrefix =. 2411.06825 , primaryClass =

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Infrared Colors of Low-Mass Stars. , keywords =. 1992

  42. [42]

    BANYAN. XI. The BANYAN Multivariate Bayesian Algorithm to Identify Members of Young Associations with 150 pc. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaae09 , archivePrefix =. 1801.09051 , primaryClass =

  43. [43]

    The Gaia Catalogue of Nearby Stars

    Gaia Early Data Release 3. The Gaia Catalogue of Nearby Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039498 , archivePrefix =. 2012.02061 , primaryClass =

  44. [44]

    Stellar multiplicity, a teaser for the hidden treasure

    Gaia Data Release 3. Stellar multiplicity, a teaser for the hidden treasure. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243782 , archivePrefix =. 2206.05595 , primaryClass =

  45. [45]

    Colour-based selection, spectral types and light curves

    M dwarfs in the b201 tile of the VVV survey. Colour-based selection, spectral types and light curves. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424066 , archivePrefix =. 1409.0862 , primaryClass =

  46. [46]

    , keywords =

    Unveiling short-period binaries in the inner VVV bulge. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab888 , archivePrefix =. 2103.16023 , primaryClass =

  47. [47]

    The 2001 US Naval Observatory Double Star CD-ROM. I. The Washington Double Star Catalog. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/323920 , adsurl =

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    Intrinsic Colors, Temperatures, and Bolometric Corrections of Pre-main-sequence Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9 , archivePrefix =. 1307.2657 , primaryClass =

  49. [49]

    16th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun , year = 2011, editor =

    Model Atmospheres From Very Low Mass Stars to Brown Dwarfs. 16th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun , year = 2011, editor =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1011.5405 , archivePrefix =. 1011.5405 , primaryClass =

  50. [50]

    Reaching the boundary between stellar kinematic groups and very wide binaries. IV. The widest Washington Double Star systems with 1000 arcsec in Gaia DR3. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245476 , archivePrefix =. 2301.01722 , primaryClass =

  51. [51]

    , keywords =

    Calibrating the metallicity of M dwarfs in wide physical binaries with F-, G-, and K-primaries - I: High-resolution spectroscopy with HERMES: stellar parameters, abundances, and kinematics. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1295 , archivePrefix =. 1805.05394 , primaryClass =

  52. [52]

    , keywords =

    The evolution of wide binary stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15744.x , archivePrefix =. 0907.2952 , primaryClass =

  53. [53]

    Reaching the boundary between stellar kinematic groups and very wide binaries . II. Librae + KU Librae: a common proper motion system in Castor separated by 1.0 pc. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913986 , archivePrefix =. 1001.5432 , primaryClass =

  54. [54]

    , keywords =

    VISTA Variables in the Via Lactea (VVV): The public ESO near-IR variability survey of the Milky Way. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.newast.2009.12.002 , archivePrefix =. 0912.1056 , primaryClass =

  55. [55]

    , keywords =

    A new near-IR window of low extinction in the Galactic plane. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732099 , archivePrefix =. 1804.07785 , primaryClass =

  56. [56]

    and Whitney, Donald R

    Mann, Henry B. and Whitney, Donald R. , title =. Annals of Mathematical Statistics , year =

  57. [57]

    Photometric content and validation

    Gaia Early Data Release 3. Photometric content and validation. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039587 , archivePrefix =. 2012.01916 , primaryClass =

  58. [58]

    , keywords =

    The VST Photometric H Survey of the Southern Galactic Plane and Bulge (VPHAS+). , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu394 , archivePrefix =. 1402.7024 , primaryClass =

  59. [59]

    , keywords =

    Milky Way Tomography with K and M Dwarf Stars: The Vertical Structure of the Galactic Disk. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa77fd , archivePrefix =. 1706.01900 , primaryClass =

  60. [60]

    , keywords =

    The Stellar Number Density Distribution in the Local Solar Neighborhood is North-South Asymmetric. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/91 , archivePrefix =. 1309.2300 , primaryClass =

  61. [61]

    The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =

    The local vertical density distribution of ultracool dwarfs M7 to L2.5 and their luminosity function. The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.21105/astro.2010.11093 , archivePrefix =. 2010.11093 , primaryClass =

  62. [62]

    Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIII , year = 2014, series =

    Aladin Lite: Embed your Sky in the Browser. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIII , year = 2014, series =

  63. [63]

    , keywords =

    Multiplicity among Solar Type Stars in the Solar Neighbourhood - Part Two - Distribution of the Orbital Elements in an Unbiased Sample. , keywords =

  64. [64]

    , keywords =

    Multiplicity among M Dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/171708 , adsurl =

  65. [65]

    , keywords =

    A Survey of Stellar Families: Multiplicity of Solar-type Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/190/1/1 , archivePrefix =. 1007.0414 , primaryClass =

  66. [66]

    Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =

    The Origin and Evolution of Multiple Star Systems. Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2203.10066 , archivePrefix =. 2203.10066 , primaryClass =

  67. [67]

    , keywords =

    Stellar, brown dwarf and multiple star properties from a radiation hydrodynamical simulation of star cluster formation. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19955.x , archivePrefix =. 1110.1092 , primaryClass =

  68. [68]

    , keywords =

    Wide binaries in the solar neighborhood. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/159725 , adsurl =

  69. [69]

    , keywords =

    Identifying and characterizing ultracool dwarfs ejected from post-encounter disintegrating systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1037 , archivePrefix =. 2304.02236 , primaryClass =

  70. [70]

    , year = 1968, month = dec, volume =

    Stars of Higher Multiplicity. , year = 1968, month = dec, volume =

  71. [71]

    , keywords =

    Searching for compact hierarchical triple system candidates in astrometric binaries and accelerated solutions. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452637 , archivePrefix =. 2411.17819 , primaryClass =

  72. [72]

    Galaxies , keywords =

    Eclipsing Binaries in Dynamically Interacting Close, Multiple Systems. Galaxies , keywords =. doi:10.3390/galaxies10010009 , archivePrefix =. 2201.01243 , primaryClass =

  73. [73]

    From Binaries to Multiples. II. Hierarchical Multiplicity of F and G Dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/147/4/87 , archivePrefix =. 1401.6827 , primaryClass =

  74. [74]

    , keywords =

    The Gaia mission. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 , archivePrefix =. 1609.04153 , primaryClass =

  75. [75]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The Gaia mission. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 , adsurl =

  76. [76]

    Summary of the contents and survey properties

    Gaia Early Data Release 3. Summary of the contents and survey properties. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039657 , archivePrefix =. 2012.01533 , primaryClass =

  77. [77]

    CARMENES input catalogue of M dwarfs. V. Luminosities, colours, and spectral energy distributions. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038295 , archivePrefix =. 2007.15077 , primaryClass =

  78. [78]

    , keywords =

    Astrometry in crowded fields towards the Galactic bulge. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346257 , archivePrefix =. 2307.13719 , primaryClass =

  79. [79]

    , keywords =

    Stellar Multiplicity. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102602 , archivePrefix =. 1303.3028 , primaryClass =

  80. [80]

    The Solar Neighborhood. XLV. The Stellar Multiplicity Rate of M Dwarfs Within 25 pc. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab05dc , archivePrefix =. 1901.06364 , primaryClass =

Showing first 80 references.