Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 236 references

The paper argues that a massive accretion disk torques binary stars into the Hills mechanism, producing bursts of S-stars and hypervelocity stars, and that the Galactic Center's young star disk drove about a hundred such disruptions.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 00:29 UTC pith:JQL5TOWB

load-bearing objection Well-validated new mechanism for disk-driven binary disruptions; the central ~10^2 Galactic Center estimate is soft because the evaporation model is a step function. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.26205 v1 pith:JQL5TOWB submitted 2026-07-28 astro-ph.GA

Binary disruptions driven by massive disks around massive black holes

Mark Dodici This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords accretion disksmassive black holesHills mechanismbinary disruptionshypervelocity starsS-starsGalactic Centertidal disruption events
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that when a massive accretion disk forms around a supermassive black hole in a galactic nucleus, its non-spherical gravity torques binary stars on nearly perpendicular orbits into extremely eccentric paths. This can fling the binary members apart through the Hills mechanism, implanting one star close to the black hole and ejecting the other as a hypervelocity star. Applying this to the Milky Way's ~5-million-year-old disk of young stars, the paper estimates a burst of roughly 100 binary disruptions, producing an excess of S-cluster stars and hypervelocity stars. This makes disk-driven disruptions a candidate explanation for the fastest known hypervelocity star and a new source of delayed tidal disruption events in other galaxies.

Core claim

The central claim is that accretion-disk-driven disruption (ADDD) is a generic, rich channel for binary destruction around massive black holes. For binaries whose outer orbits are nearly perpendicular to the disk, the disk torque drives their angular momentum down while conserving its component along the disk axis, pushing many of them into the loss cone on a timescale comparable to disk growth. The paper derives a semi-analytical formula for the fraction of binaries disrupted as a function of distance from the black hole, validates it numerically, and estimates that the disk that formed the Galactic Center's young stars disrupted on the order of 100 binaries. The byproducts—implanted S-star

What carries the argument

The key object is the 'librating island' of phase space, a set of orbits in the loss wedge whose argument of pericenter librates rather than circulates under the disk potential. Orbits in this island are the ones the disk torque can drive to the loss cone. The paper uses a fitting formula for the separatrix action of this island, which generalizes previous results to arbitrary disk and cluster density slopes, to write the disrupted-binary distribution as an integral over the loss wedge and island.

Load-bearing premise

The estimate that ~100 binaries were disrupted assumes that binaries survive unchanged until a single evaporation time and then vanish completely; the paper's own variant that lets hard binaries live longer increases the count dramatically, so the number is sensitive to this idealized binary depletion model.

What would settle it

Measuring the ejection-age distribution of hypervelocity stars: the model predicts a burst of ejections about 5 Myr ago, roughly isotropic, whereas steady-state mechanisms predict a flat age distribution. If a complete sample of HVSs shows no burst at that epoch, the ADDD burst estimate would be contradicted.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If a massive disk formed in the Galactic Center ~5 Myr ago, the model predicts a burst of ~100 disrupted binaries, producing an excess of S-stars and hypervelocity stars above the steady background.
  • Hypervelocity stars from ADDD are ejected roughly isotropically and in temporal bursts, a combination unique among known mechanisms; this signature can be searched for in future surveys.
  • In other galaxies, the S-star analogues implanted by ADDD can later be driven to tidal disruption, producing (possibly repeating) TDEs in the ~0.1–1 Gyr after an AGN phase, which may help explain TDE excesses in post-starburst galaxies.
  • The disk torque also drives secular chaos in binaries that are not disrupted, potentially shrinking stellar binaries and merging compact-object binaries via gravitational-wave emission.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If ~100 binaries were disrupted in a burst 5 Myr ago, the present-day S-star cluster should contain a population of older, low-mass stars with a distinctive age gap; future faint-object observations could test this by detecting the low-mass tail of implanted stars.
  • Because ADDD ejects stars nearly isotropically, surveys that look for a planar or axial signature might miss this channel; joint analysis of ejection times and velocities may be more discriminating than sky position alone.
  • The paper's evaporation model may be the main lever on the rate: if hard binaries survive many evaporation times, the number of disruptions in old nuclear clusters could be an order of magnitude higher than the fiducial estimate, making ADDD competitive with two-body relaxation as a steady HVS source.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper extends the Kaur & Stone (2025) disk-driven disruption mechanism from single stars to binaries. It characterizes the outer-orbit conditions for binary disruptions (loss wedge and librating island), proposes a fitting formula for the separatrix action (Eq. 4), constructs a toy binary population (§4.3), and derives semi-analytical plus Monte Carlo estimates of the number of disruptions (Eqs. 7–8). These estimates are compared with N-body integrations in Fig. 6. The application to the Galactic Center's ~5-Myr-old clockwise disk yields a burst of ~10^2 binary disruptions, which the authors connect to S-cluster stars, hypervelocity stars, and possibly S5-HVS1. They also discuss implications for TDEs in post-starburst galaxies and argue that ADDD produces near-isotropic, bursty HVS ejections.

Significance. If the central estimate holds, ADDD would be a new, observationally relevant channel for Hills-mechanism disruptions, with a distinctive combination of bursty and near-isotropic ejection. The paper's strengths include a generic semi-analytical framework that extends KS25 to arbitrary disk/cluster density slopes, a careful Monte Carlo-vs-N-body comparison in Fig. 6, and falsifiable predictions for S-star magnitudes, HVS sky positions, and TDE delay timescales. The S5-HVS1 comparison is post-hoc but not used to fit parameters. The main weakness is that the headline number ~10^2 depends on a step-function binary-evaporation model whose sensitivity the authors themselves demonstrate in Fig. 7. The mechanism is well founded; the quantitative population-level prediction is not yet robust.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.3 (items 5–6), Eq. (12), Fig. 7] The step-function evaporation model — binaries are kept unchanged until t_age = t_evap and then removed — is the single most load-bearing population assumption in the paper. Equations (7)–(8) inherit it through r_m in Eq. (10), and Eq. (12) sets t_evap. The authors themselves show in Fig. 7 (purple points) that replacing this by 'long-lived hard binaries' raises N_d by more than an order of magnitude for the Chen+23 SFH, and the text acknowledges that this 'improved physics can cause a drastic increase.' Since the N-body validation in §5 only checks which orbits reach r_t for a prescribed binary population, it does not constrain this survival assumption. The headline '~10^2' is therefore not pinned by the validated orbital dynamics. I request either a calibration of the survival model against the observed binary-fraction profile, or a reframing of the central claim as a conditional estim
  2. [§4.3, Eq. (10), Eq. (14)] The binary population model takes f_b,h=1 and λ=0 'throughout this work', yet the observational constraints are admittedly sparse. N_d is linear in f_b,h (see the d f_b,h/dain factor in Eq. (14)) and λ enters the radial exponent Λ in Eq. (B11); taking f_b,h~0.3–0.5 and λ>0 would reduce N_d by factors of 2–5 or more. The paper does not explore this in Fig. 7, so the plotted range understates the model uncertainty. The central estimate should be accompanied by a calculation of its sensitivity to these parameters.
  3. [§5, Fig. 6] The 'excellent agreement' between Monte Carlo and N-body validates the orbit-averaged loss-wedge/librating-island selection, not the full binary-disruption count. The simulations assign a_in and m_b from the population model and record whether the outer orbit reaches r_t; they do not evolve the binary population, evaporate binaries, or model binary-single interactions. Thus the validation is narrower than the abstract's 'validated with numerical simulations' implies. Please state explicitly that the population-level assumptions in §4.3 are not validated by Fig. 6.
  4. [§6.2, Fig. 7] The text states estimates range 'from a few to a few hundred' and 'our most detailed models suggest the number was 50–100,' while the abstract and conclusions state '~10^2.' Given the factor-of-several spread from β, μ, and IMF, plus the >10 effect of the long-lived-hard-binary variant, calling this 'order-of-magnitude-accurate' is not supported by the model's own sensitivity. I recommend a more cautious summary of the quantitative payload, and a discussion of which future observations (e.g., HVS ejection-time distribution, low-mass S-star population) could discriminate among the variants.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (6) and Fig. 4] The piecewise scaling for f_d(a) is stated without derivation in the main text; the Appendix B derivation is clear, but a one-sentence justification in §3.3.1 would help. Also, Fig. 4's dashed lines are arbitrarily normalized; please state the normalization in the caption.
  2. [§6.2 vs Fig. 7 caption] The text says 'our most detailed models suggest the number was 50–100' while the Fig. 7 caption says 'between ~10 and ~10^2'; make these consistent.
  3. [References] 'von Ziepel, H. V. 1909' should be 'von Zeipel, H. V. 1909' (standard spelling of the ZLK mechanism).
  4. [Appendix C] The 'factor 10' in p(shrink|enter) is introduced as the only fine-tuning; since it is set to match the Dodici et al. (2026) simulations, please report its sensitivity (e.g., how N_d changes if this factor is 3 or 30).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the ~10^2 estimate is a conditional prediction from an explicit population model, not a fitted or self-referential quantity.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The orbital-dynamics input—loss wedge, librating island, separatrix action—is taken from Kaur & Stone (2025) and generalized; the separatrix fit (eq. 4) and its J_sat, χ_sat parameters are fitted to numerically evaluated phase-space separatrices, not to the target disruption count. The population integrals (eqs. 7–8) convolve this dynamics with an explicit toy binary population, with the paper stating 'We take f_b,h = 1 and λ = 0 throughout' and 'Observational constraints for our model are sparse'—these are stated assumptions, not fitted values. The '~10^2' estimate is therefore a conditional prediction under those assumptions. The paper itself flags the key sensitivity ('This improved physics can cause a drastic increase in the number of disruptions from older populations') and lists 'Primary sources of uncertainty are the velocity anisotropy, the star-formation history, and the initial mass function slope.' The S5-HVS1 coincidence is post-hoc and is not used to calibrate any model parameter. Self-citations to Dodici et al. (2026) appear in Appendix C and Section 6.2 for binary shrinking, but the paper states this 'only leads to a small increase in the number of disruptions,' so the self-citation is not load-bearing for the central claim. No constructed equality between inputs and predictions was found.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

8 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model relies on several adopted parameters (mu, gamma_d, beta, IMF, binary-fraction parameters) and on the KS25 disk potential family. The only explicitly fine-tuned quantity is the factor 10 in the binary-shrinking stochastic model (Appendix C). No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (8)
  • mu (disk-to-MBH mass ratio) = 0.1 (fiducial); varied 0.05-1
    Sets disk potential strength; chosen from AGN disk models and CWD mass estimate (Sec. 2.3, 6.2).
  • gamma_d (disk density slope) = 5/2 (fiducial)
    Motivated by Sirko & Goodman (2003) and Thompson et al. (2005) AGN disk models (Sec. 2.3).
  • beta (velocity anisotropy) = 0 (fiducial)
    Assumed isotropic (Sec. 2.3); varied to -0.3 in Fig. 7.
  • J_sat, chi_sat (separatrix-action fit parameters) = Table 2 values per gamma_d (e.g., 0.685±0.005, 3.58±0.14 for gamma_d=2.5)
    Fitted to numerical evaluations of the orbit-averaged potential (eq. 4).
  • alpha_m (IMF slope) = 1.7 (fiducial); varied 1.5, 2.3
    Sets binary mass distribution; observational uncertainty (Sec. 6.2).
  • f_b,h (binary fraction at r_h) = 1
    Toy model choice; 'We take f_b,h = 1 and lambda = 0 throughout this work' (Sec. 4.3).
  • lambda (binary formation efficiency power) = 0
    Chosen for simplicity; nonzero implies fewer binaries at small a (Sec. 4.3).
  • factor 10 in p(shrink|enter) = 10
    Explicitly 'the only fine-tuning of this model, set to match the empirical p(shrink|enter) from the Dodici et al. (2026) simulations' (Appendix C).
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption KS25 axisymmetric potential-density pairs represent AGN disk torques
    Adopted in Sec. 2.2; Appendix A.5 shows qualitative equivalence with Sirko & Goodman (2003) and Thompson et al. (2005) disk models.
  • domain assumption Spherical power-law cluster potential (gamma_c)
    Sec. 2.2; standard NSC model.
  • domain assumption Secular orbit-averaged treatment for analytical estimates
    Used for phase portraits and analytic scalings; caveat noted near r_h (footnote in Sec. 3.2), numerical work avoids averaging.
  • domain assumption Binary disrupts when outer orbit reaches tidal radius r_t
    Eq. (2) and Sec. 3.1; paper notes disruption may occur outside/inside r_t and justifies via deep plunges (Sec. 5).
  • domain assumption Milky Way's young stellar disk formed in situ from a massive gas disk ~5 Myr ago
    Observational interpretation cited in Sec. 6 (Genzel et al. 2003; Paumard et al. 2006; Yelda et al. 2014; von Fellenberg et al. 2022).
  • domain assumption NSC star formation histories (three models)
    Sec. 6.1 based on Schödel et al. 2020, Chen et al. 2023, uniform; highly uncertain.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 30317 in / 14899 out tokens · 123142 ms · 2026-08-01T00:29:13.228178+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Accretion disks around massive black holes (MBHs) in galactic nuclei can contain significant mass, in which case their non-spherical potentials exert significant torques on single and binary stars orbiting the MBHs. These torques can drive orbits to very large eccentricities. Previous works have shown that this driving can cause disruptions of single stars by the tidal gravity of the MBH. Here, we characterize the ability of these torques to drive binary stars to the point of disruption via the Hills mechanism. We derive semi-analytical estimates, validated with numerical simulations, of the number of binary disruptions driven by a generic disk in a generic nucleus. Using these results, we estimate that the formation of the ~5-Myr-old disk of stars in the Galactic Center drove a burst of ~10^2 binary disruptions. These disruptions produced an excess of S-cluster stars and hypervelocity stars --- possibly including S5-HVS1, the fastest-known hypervelocity star. In other galaxies, analogues of S-cluster stars produced by this process may evolve into tidal disruption events following a disk phase. Hypervelocity star observations may help clarify the importance of disk-driven disruptions, which eject stars nearly isotropically and in temporal bursts --- a unique combination among processes driving binary disruptions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26205 by Mark Dodici.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: shows our setup, now described in detail. We choose a reference frame such that the z-axis coincides with the normal vector of the disk (i.e., the symmetry axis of the overall potential). The MBH sits at the ori￾gin; the distance from it is r. Most orbits of interest are bound to the MBH, so it is natural to use the classical orbit elements, including MBH cluster disk "outer" orbit "inner" orbit [PITH_FUL… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Two outer orbits evolve under a disk potential. In one (pink line), the binary on the orbit is driven to dis￾ruption — its angular momentum reaches the critical value ℓcrit (eq. 3). The binary on the orange orbit is not driven to disruption. Semimajor axes are equal and constant, as is ℓz. The only difference between the orbits is their initial ℓ; the pink orbit is in the librating island, while the orange… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: For fixed binary properties, the fraction of sys￾tems reaching the tidal disruption radius (rt) is approxi￾mately a piecewise power law in distance from the MBH (eq. 6). The break occurs at the separatrix saturation ra￾dius, rsat (green line; eq. 5). Here, the black line shows results of numerical integrations of outer orbits; rt is set by mb = 4 M⊙ and ain = 1 au. The dashed lines show the noted scalings,… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The number of disrupted binaries increases with cluster anisotropy β and decreases with cluster age (left). The number increases with disk mass µ and decreases with disk concentration γd (right), but less steeply than with cluster properties. The numbers shown are for a cluster of 105 M⊙ of stars. The small circle shows the fiducial parameters, which are also used in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: — an isotropic cluster born 100 Myr before the disk arose. 4.7. Monte Carlo sampling of population The (semi-)analytical work done so far provides useful insight into the dependence of ADDD on various prop￾erties of the cluster and disk. That said, Monte Carlo solutions to integrals (7) and (8) provide more flexibility and do not require any approximation. For the remainder of this work, results come from … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: During the formation of the young disk of stars around Sgr A*, between ∼ 10 and ∼ 102 binaries should have been disrupted by ADDD. Each column shows estimates for a given NSC star formation history, with a variety of as￾sumptions about cluster and disk properties (triangles, xs, and small dots) and improved aspects of pre-disk binary dy￾namics (different colors). These variations are discussed in Section 6… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Properties of S-star analogues implanted by ADDD during the formation of the CWD, under three as￾sumed NSC star-formation histories. We show the distri￾butions of masses (top), K-band magnitudes (middle), and semimajor axes (bottom); the latter two panels also show distributions of detected S-stars (Gillessen et al. 2017). The￾oretical distributions are not corrected with selection func￾tions or post-impla… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: On-sky positions, in ra and dec (degrees), of simulated HVSs ejected during the formation of the CWD (oversampled by a factor of 50 for visualization). Color and size indicate ejection speed and current heliocentric distance, respectively. S5-HVS1 is shown for reference, circled in red at (344, −51). The black line and x show the Galactic midplane and Center, respectively. The grey region shows the DESI fo… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: HVS ejections are only anisotropic at the ∼ 10% level, which may be difficult to detect in observed distribu￾tions. This figure shows the deviation from isotropy across a range of polar angles for velocity vectors at disruption among simulated outer orbits. Bin widths are shown by horizontal lines; vertical lines show Poisson errors. The velocity distribution of ejected stars may be esti￾mated by combinin… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Secular chaos, driven by outer-orbit evolution, can cause binaries that do not become disrupted to reach very large inner-orbit eccentricities. Here, we compare the re￾sults of quadrupole-order ZLK cycles (blue) to binaries sub￾ject to the same equations of motion, but with their outer orbits torqued by a massive disk (orange). A thermal CDF is shown in grey, for reference. pericenter separations; stellar… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The action of the librating island separatrix is well-fit by equation (4). In the left panel, we show numerically evaluted separatrix actions as a function of a for KS25 disks with a range of physical properties. Color indicates γd (dark purple is small, bright green is large). We also show the action for Sirko & Goodman (2003) and Thompson et al. (2005) disk models, which have similar shapes to KS25 disk… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Cumulative distributions of | cos i| at disruption for a mock population of binaries under a range of possible distributions of γz ≡ ℓz/ℓcrit (colored lines) and for the binaries disrupted in our simulations (black, dotted line). underlying the two studies. In their work, a static loss wedge must be refilled. In ours, a transient disk arises and presents a brand new loss wedge; disruptions come from orbit… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

236 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    The Loss-cone Problem in Axisymmetric Nuclei. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/87 , archivePrefix =. 1301.3150 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    Disruptions of stars and binary systems on chaotic orbits in an axisymmetric Milky Way centre. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1237 , archivePrefix =. 2505.06344 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1220 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1220 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1220

  4. [4]

    arXiv , author =:1903.00010 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1e4d , eid =. arXiv , author =:1903.00010 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

  5. [5]

    arXiv , author =:2312.17319 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad61e1 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2312.17319 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    arXiv , author =:1910.02079 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8461 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1910.02079 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910

  7. [7]

    arXiv , author =:2303.16231 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf65b , eid =. arXiv , author =:2303.16231 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    arXiv , author =:1509.03633 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526757 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1509.03633 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    doi:10.1086/177864 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1086/177864 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1086/177864

  10. [10]

    doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1556-x , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1556-x , eprint =

    doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1556-x

  11. [11]

    arXiv , author =:2002.08967 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037610 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2002.08967 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  12. [12]

    doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03394-6 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03394-6 , eprint =

    doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03394-6

  13. [13]

    arXiv , author =:2110.10786 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac313b , eid =. arXiv , author =:2110.10786 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  14. [14]

    arXiv , author =:2207.07511 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244512 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2207.07511 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02073-y , eprint =

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02073-y , eprint =

    doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02073-y

  16. [16]

    arXiv , author =:2009.03321 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe38d , eid =. arXiv , author =:2009.03321 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  17. [17]

    arXiv , author =:2208.12452 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244805 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2208.12452 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    arXiv , author =:2209.07538 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9f36 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2209.07538 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  19. [19]

    doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa020 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa020 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa020

  20. [20]

    doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad113 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad113 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad113

  21. [21]

    arXiv , author =:2001.03504 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb3cc , eid =. arXiv , author =:2001.03504 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  22. [22]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/176.3.633 , journal =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/176.3.633

  23. [23]

    doi:10.1038/331687a0 , journal =

    doi:10.1038/331687a0

  24. [24]

    arXiv , author =:2203.08162 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6021 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2203.08162 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  25. [25]

    An Estimate of the Binary Star Fraction Among Young Stars at the Galactic Center: Possible Evidence of a Radial Dependence

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2401.12555 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2401.12555 , journal =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.12555

  26. [26]

    arXiv , author =:2303.16977 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc93e , eid =. arXiv , author =:2303.16977 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    doi:10.1086/172607 , journal =

    doi:10.1086/172607

  28. [28]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/173.3.729 , journal =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/173.3.729

  29. [29]

    Eccentricity dynamics of wide binaries -- II. The effect of stellar encounters and constraints on formation channels

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2311.04352 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2311.04352 , journal =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.04352

  30. [30]

    doi:10.1086/313392 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1086/313392 , eprint =

    doi:10.1086/313392

  31. [31]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3470 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3470 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3470

  32. [32]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1933 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1933 , eprint =

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/2/1933 1933

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    Dynamics of recaptures, ejections, and mergers of stellar mass binaries over multiple encounters with Sgr A*. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1766 , archivePrefix =. 2505.08499 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    The Two Young Star Disks in the Central Parsec of the Galaxy: Properties, Dynamics, and Formation. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/503273 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0601268 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    The Young Stars in the Galactic Center. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac68ef , archivePrefix =. 2205.07595 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  36. [38]

    , keywords =

    Enhanced activity of massive black holes by stellar capture assisted by a self-gravitating accretion disc. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066068 , archivePrefix =. 0704.2781 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [39]

    arXiv , author =:2101.05825 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abdc25 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2101.05825 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [40]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab609 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab609 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab609

  39. [41]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2203 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2203 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2203

  40. [42]

    arXiv , author =:2210.09945 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbfb6 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2210.09945 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [43]

    arXiv , author =:2304.00775 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346565 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2304.00775 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [44]

    arXiv , author =:2211.09851 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbd3d , eid =. arXiv , author =:2211.09851 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [45]

    arXiv , author =:2102.08135 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac05c6 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2102.08135 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [46]

    arXiv , author =:2110.10855 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac31aa , eid =. arXiv , author =:2110.10855 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  45. [47]

    arXiv , author =:2404.08138 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5cf2 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2404.08138 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [48]

    arXiv , author =:2001.03626 , journal =

    doi:10.1007/s00159-020-00125-0 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2001.03626 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  47. [49]

    doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3121 , eprint =

    Reviews of Modern Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3121 , eprint =

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.3121

  48. [50]

    arXiv , author =:1403.6657 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423481 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1403.6657 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [51]

    arXiv , author =:2307.11821 , journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347416 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2307.11821 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [52]

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055306 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055306 , eprint =

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055306

  51. [53]

    doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.15.1 , journal =

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.15.1

  52. [54]

    doi:10.1016/S1384-1076(96)00012-7 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S1384-1076(96)00012-7 , eprint =

    doi:10.1016/s1384-1076(96)00012-7

  53. [56]

    arXiv , author =:1805.10313 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aadae2 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1805.10313 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [57]

    arXiv , author =:1802.08890 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aac88e , eid =. arXiv , author =:1802.08890 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  55. [58]

    doi:10.1086/118405 , journal =

    doi:10.1086/118405

  56. [59]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1730 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1730 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1730

  57. [60]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2026 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2026 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2026

  58. [61]

    arXiv , author =:1812.07053 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2f78 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1812.07053 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [62]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv057 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv057 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv057

  60. [63]

    arXiv , author =:2306.03703 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0be2 , eid =. arXiv , author =:2306.03703 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [64]

    doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2552 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2552 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2552

  62. [65]

    , month = jul, pages =

  63. [66]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2720 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2720 , eprint =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2720

  64. [67]

    arXiv , author =:1710.02542 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaa970 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1710.02542 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [68]

    arXiv , author =:2203.01947 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8aff , eid =. arXiv , author =:2203.01947 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [69]

    arXiv , author =:1110.6655 , journal =

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/4 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1110.6655 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [70]

    arXiv , author =:1405.6029 , journal =

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/118 , eid =. arXiv , author =:1405.6029 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [71]

    doi:10.1086/305670 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1086/305670 , eprint =

    doi:10.1086/305670

  69. [72]

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315 , eprint =

    , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315 , eprint =

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315

  70. [73]

    doi:doi/10.1002/asna.19091832202 , journal =

    doi:10.1002/asna.19091832202

  71. [74]

    doi:10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0 , journal =

    doi:10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0

  72. [75]

    doi:10.1086/108790 , journal =

    doi:10.1086/108790

  73. [76]

    doi:10.1086/111815 , journal =

    doi:10.1086/111815

  74. [77]

    arXiv , author =:2002.10547 , journal =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab94bc , eid =. arXiv , author =:2002.10547 , journal =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  75. [78]

    , keywords =

    A Stream of Hypervelocity Stars from the Galactic Center. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbf4f , archivePrefix =. 2005.10267 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  76. [79]

    The distribution of stars around the Milky Way's central black hole. II. Diffuse light from sub-giants and dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730452 , archivePrefix =. 1701.03817 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [80]

    The distribution of stars around the Milky Way's central black hole. I. Deep star counts. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730451 , archivePrefix =. 1701.03816 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [81]

    , keywords =

    The old nuclear star cluster in the Milky Way: dynamics, mass, statistical parallax, and black hole mass. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2452 , archivePrefix =. 1403.5266 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [82]

    , keywords =

    The nuclear star cluster of the Milky Way: proper motions and mass. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200810922 , archivePrefix =. 0902.3892 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [83]

    , keywords =

    Three-dimensional Stellar Kinematics at the Galactic Center: Measuring the Nuclear Star Cluster Spatial Density Profile, Black Hole Mass, and Distance. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/779/1/L6 , archivePrefix =. 1311.0886 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

Showing first 80 references.