Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 62 references

Interacting dark-matter Q-balls flatten galactic density cusps by converting central rest mass into escaping radiation.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 04:51 UTC pith:C2KOH5MM

load-bearing objection Solid toy-model calculation showing Q-ball mergers can flatten NFW cusps via rest-mass loss, with a clean self-regulating σ/m drop; the mono-charge ODE is the real soft spot, not a fatal one. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.28517 v1 pith:C2KOH5MM submitted 2026-07-30 hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.GA

Dynamical flattening of halo density cusps by Q-ball dark matter

Alexander Libanov , Sergey Troitsky This is my paper
classification hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.GA
keywords dark matterQ-ballscusp-core problemself-interacting dark mattergalactic halosnontopological solitonshalo density profiles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Cold collisionless dark matter builds the large-scale universe well but leaves galaxy centers too dense and too uniform compared with what is observed. This paper shows that if dark matter is made of Q-balls—macroscopic solitons stabilized by a conserved charge—then mergers in the dense inner halo convert part of their rest mass into relativistic dark-sector particles that stream away. Because mergers are far more frequent at the center than in the outskirts, the inner cusp is preferentially eroded into a core while the outer halo stays largely intact. A single density-dependent evolution equation, constrained by cluster self-interaction limits and microlensing bounds, produces both cored and still-cuspy profiles across a wide range of halo masses. The result is a dynamical, self-regulating mechanism that can address the cusp-core problem and the diversity of inner rotation curves without spoiling large-scale structure.

Core claim

In a representative toy model of dark-sector Q-balls that constitute all dark matter, density-dependent merging converts a fraction of non-relativistic rest-mass energy into free-streaming relativistic particles and thereby transforms an initial NFW cusp into a cored inner density profile while leaving the outer halo essentially unchanged, for parameters satisfying 22.3 MeV ≲ v Q₀^{1/12} ≲ 81.2 MeV.

What carries the argument

The radial evolution equation for the dimensionless density ratio ξ = ρ_DM/ρ_NFW, driven by geometric Q-ball mergers that eject a fixed thin-wall mass defect as relativistic φ particles; the merger rate scales with local density and velocity dispersion, so the energy loss is strongest at the center and self-regulating.

Load-bearing premise

After formation the halo is treated as a closed box of equal-charge Q-balls at each radius that always merge with a fixed geometric cross-section and fixed probability, instantly ejecting the mass defect, with no later halo mergers or mixed-charge populations.

What would settle it

High-resolution inner density profiles of dwarfs and clusters that never develop cores inside the cross-section window still allowed by the Bullet Cluster, or microlensing that closes the entire allowed (v, Q₀) range, would rule the mechanism out.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Halo centers lose mass to dark radiation while outer profiles remain close to NFW.
  • The same parameter window can yield both cored and still-cuspy systems, supplying diversity at fixed halo mass.
  • Effective self-interaction cross-section per unit mass falls as Q-balls grow, automatically weakening interactions in denser regions.
  • Predicted Σ versus V_max tracks lie between pure NFW and Burkert loci and can cover the observed scatter.
  • Large-scale structure and outer-halo dynamics stay essentially standard cold dark matter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The escaping relativistic φ component could leave a late-time free-streaming or ΔN_eff signature if it couples even weakly outside the dark sector.
  • Because the core-forming process is purely dark-sector and radius-dependent, it can sit alongside mild baryonic feedback without double-counting the same mass deficit.
  • Including multi-charge populations or hierarchical halo mergers (omitted in the toy model) would likely widen the scatter in core sizes still further.
  • If Q-balls form in a dark-sector phase transition, the initial charge Q₀ becomes a cosmological parameter that could be tied to the present-day core fraction of galaxies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that dark-matter Q-balls in a dark-sector Friedberg–Lee–Sirlin model can dynamically flatten NFW density cusps. After an initial NFW halo forms at z0≈13 from equal-charge Q-balls, geometric mergers proceed preferentially in dense centers; because MQ∝Q^{3/4}, each merger converts a fixed thin-wall mass fraction (~16%) into relativistic φ particles that escape, reducing the nonrelativistic density via ρ_DM/ρ_NFW=(Q/Q0)^{-1/4}. The evolution is reduced to a closed dimensionless PDE (Eq. 3.12) for a single characteristic charge Q(t,r). Within 22.3 MeV ≲ v Q0^{1/12} ≲ 81.2 MeV the model satisfies Bullet-Cluster-scale SIDM bounds, microlensing limits, and produces cusp-to-core transitions, with outer halos largely intact and some diversity in Σ–Vmax.

Significance. If the mechanism survives more realistic multi-charge kinetics and hierarchical assembly, it offers a distinctive, self-regulating alternative to velocity-dependent SIDM and baryonic feedback: the cross section per mass falls automatically as Q grows, so interactions shut off after core formation without fine-tuned velocity dependence. The derivation from thin-wall FLS relations through charge conservation to Eq. (3.12) is transparent and falsifiable in principle via the predicted radial dependence of effective σ/m and residual dark radiation. The work is honestly framed as a toy model and identifies concrete future steps (formation, multi-charge kinetics, halo mergers). That combination makes it a useful contribution to the small-scale DM literature even if quantitative bands shift under refined kinetics.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eqs. (3.5)–(3.12); Sec. 4.3–4.4; Fig. 7] Sec. 3.2, Eqs. (3.5)–(3.12): The entire quantitative pipeline (parameter window (4.18), density profiles in Figs. 3–5, rotation curves in Fig. 6, and the Σ–Vmax band in Fig. 7) rests on a mono-charge closure in which every radius is described by a single Q(t,r) with ∂Q/∂t = Q σ_r σ_Q n_Q. After the first mergers a broad charge spectrum develops; because σ_Q/M_Q ∝ Q^{-1/4}, large-Q objects freeze out while small-Q objects continue to merge, so the net rest-mass conversion into φ is an integral over pairs, not the mono-charge rate. The paper correctly flags multi-charge kinetics as future work (Sec. 6), but the claimed dynamical mechanism and the observational comparison are presented as if the mono-charge ODE were representative. At minimum the manuscript needs either (i) a controlled estimate of the spectral correction to the mass-loss rate (e.g., a two- or few-bin calculation) showing t
  2. [Sec. 4.3, Eqs. (4.15)–(4.18); Fig. 2] Sec. 4.3, Eqs. (4.15)–(4.18): The upper and lower edges of the ‘allowed’ window on v Q0^{1/12} are defined by requiring Σ_B ≲ Σ_DM ≲ Σ_N over a chosen Vmax range. That makes the statement that the model ‘exhibits a cusp-to-core transition’ for parameters in (4.18) partly true by construction of the window, rather than an independent prediction. The Bullet-Cluster lower bound (4.3) is external and useful; the upper bound from (4.16) is not. The paper should separate externally constrained parameters from those selected to produce cores, and report how much core formation (e.g., central density reduction or core radius) occurs as a continuous function of C (Eq. 3.13) without folding the desired outcome into the definition of the viable region.
  3. [Sec. 3.1–3.2, Eqs. (3.1), (3.8)] Sec. 3.1–3.2, Eqs. (3.1), (3.8): Two idealizations that control the amplitude of mass loss are stated but not stress-tested: (i) the post-merger mass defect is instantly converted to free-streaming relativistic φ that leave the halo and never return, so that ρ_NFW = ρ_DM + ρ_φ with ρ_φ inert; (ii) the halo is a closed, isolated system with no accretion or halo–halo mergers after z0≈13. If a non-negligible fraction of the defect remains bound, thermalizes, or is re-accreted, or if late mergers reset the inner charge distribution, the net inner mass deficit can change by O(1). A short discussion or order-of-magnitude estimate of the sensitivity of the final core to the escaped fraction and to a simple accretion/merger term would make the central claim much more robust.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. 1; Fig. 7] The abstract and introduction state that the mechanism ‘may contribute to observed diversity,’ but the only diversity shown is the band from varying v Q0^{1/12} at fixed halo mass (Figs. 3b, 6–7). A sentence clarifying that halo-to-halo scatter in Q0 or formation time is not yet modeled would avoid over-reading Fig. 7.
  2. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.3)] Eq. (3.3) and the text adopt a fixed ~50% merge probability from MSSM Q-ball collision studies. A brief note on whether that fraction is expected to be similar for macroscopic thin-wall FLS Q-balls (and how C scales with it) would help.
  3. [Sec. 4.1; Fig. 1] Figure 1 caption and the Bullet-Cluster discussion use σ̄_Q0(z=z0) ≲ 10 cm²/g to guarantee σ̄_Q(z=0.3) < 1 cm²/g at ~150 kpc. Stating the adopted M200 and concentration for that cluster run explicitly in the caption would improve reproducibility.
  4. [Title page; Abstract] Minor typographical/formatting issues in the compiled text: author name spacing (‘T roitsky’), missing spaces in the abstract PDF extraction, and inconsistent use of σ̄_Q vs σ_Q for the cross section per mass. A proofreading pass is warranted.
  5. [Sec. 3.1–3.2, Eq. (3.4)] The Jeans equation (3.4) is applied under a ‘weakly collisional’ assumption while the inner halo is building large σ/m early on. A one-sentence caveat on when the isotropic Jeans σ_r remains adequate would be useful.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Dynamical mass-loss ODE is independent, but the quantitative ‘allowed’ window is cut so that Σ lies between NFW and Burkert, then Fig. 7 presents that same band as explaining observed diversity.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 4.3, Eqs. (4.15)–(4.17); Sec. 5 / Fig. 7]
    "to satisfy Σ_B ≲ Σ_DM ≲ Σ_N for V_1 ≲ V_max ≲ V_2, it is sufficient to require Σ_DM|_{V1} ≲ Σ_N|_{V1} and Σ_DM|_{V2} ≳ Σ_B|_{V2}. Numerical solution of Eq. 3.12 allows us to reformulate the conditions (4.15), (4.16) as 1.3 MeV ≲ v Q_0^{1/12} ≲ 81.2 MeV. ... Finally, we solve equation (3.12) for ... v Q_0^{1/12} satisfying (4.18). ... we obtain Σ_DM(V_max) relation at z=0 and compare it with Ref. [9] in Fig. 7."

    The lower/upper edges of the parameter window are defined by demanding that the model’s Σ_DM already lie between the Burkert and NFW curves over a chosen V_max range. Fig. 7 then displays that same window as the model’s explanation of the observed Σ–V_max diversity. The placement between NFW and Burkert is therefore guaranteed by the cut (4.17), not an out-of-sample prediction. (The orthogonal Bullet-Cluster floor 22.3 MeV is independent; only the diversity-band claim is circular.)

  2. self citation load bearing [Sec. 3.1–3.2; Sec. 4.2; Ref. [40]]
    "Based on [40], we deduce that Q-balls actively merge in the central parts of the halo. ... Ref. [40] demonstrated that the main part of the Q-balls in the halo do not interact and, hence, do not change their masses and radii. Therefore, it is sufficient to constrain the mass of the initial Q-ball with charges Q_0 ... We assume that most of the solitons are born with charges close to a certain value Q_0; this is indeed the case for the phase-transition production mechanism [40]."

    The mono-charge, single-characteristic-Q(r) ansatz and the claim that the bulk of the halo mass remains in unmerged Q_0 objects (used for the microlensing bound and for closing the ODE) are imported from the first author’s prior paper [40] rather than re-derived or externally validated here. The present ODE (3.12) is written down afresh, so the self-citation is only partially load-bearing; it does not by itself force the cusp-flattening result, but it underwrites the simplifications that make the quantitative band possible.

full rationale

The core mechanism is not tautological. Within the FLS thin-wall relations M_Q ∝ Q^{3/4} and geometric σ_Q, two equal-charge mergers necessarily shed a fixed rest-mass fraction (~0.16), and the mono-charge continuity equation (3.5)–(3.11) yields a genuine density-dependent ODE (3.12) whose solutions can flatten an NFW cusp. Bullet-Cluster and microlensing cuts are external. Circularity appears only at the quantitative claim level: Sec. 4.3 defines the viable interval on v Q_0^{1/12} by requiring the evolved Σ_DM(V_max) to sit between the Burkert and NFW loci (Eqs. 4.15–4.17); Sec. 5 and Fig. 7 then plot precisely that interval as the model’s account of observed halo diversity. That step is true by construction of the cut, not an independent prediction. A secondary, non-load-bearing self-citation to the first author’s prior mono-charge framework [40] supplies the equal-charge ansatz and the claim that most Q-balls never merge, but the ODE itself is re-derived here. Overall score 4: partial circularity confined to the diversity-band presentation; the dynamical mass-loss argument retains independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 7 axioms · 2 invented entities

The claim rests on a dark-sector FLS Q-ball population that constitutes all DM, forms NFW halos at fixed z0, and evolves only by equal-charge geometric mergers with fixed mass defect escaping as φ radiation. Free parameters v and Q0 (through v Q0^{1/12}) are scanned to satisfy external bounds and to place profiles between NFW and Burkert. Invented/postulated content is the dark-only FLS Q-ball DM sector with the stated merger and energy-loss rules; standard gravity, ΛCDM distances, and NFW/Burkert phenomenology are imported.

free parameters (6)
  • v (FLS vacuum scale) = example 13.5 keV; constrained via v Q0^{1/12}
    Lagrangian parameter setting Q-ball mass and radius; scanned jointly with Q0. Not fixed by a first-principles calculation in this paper.
  • Q0 (initial characteristic charge) = example 10^43; enters as Q0^{1/12} in constraints
    Assumed birth charge of most Q-balls; free starting parameter (Sec. 3.1). Example 10^43.
  • v Q0^{1/12} combination = 22.3–81.2 MeV (allowed band)
    Single combination controlling σ/m and merger rate; window 22.3–81.2 MeV chosen so Bullet Cluster, microlensing, and cusp-to-core Σ conditions hold simultaneously (Eq. 4.18).
  • z0 (initial NFW formation redshift) = ≈13
    Sets t=0 for the evolution integral; taken as ≈13 from Ref. [41], not derived here.
  • merge probability ≈50% = ≈0.5
    Taken from prior Q-ball collision studies [46,47] and fixed in σ_Q = 2π R_Q^2; not recomputed for FLS kinematics in-halo.
  • mass-defect fraction ≈0.16 = ≈0.16
    Thin-wall equal-charge estimate (2M(Q)-M(2Q))/(2M(Q)) used for energy lost to φ (Eq. 3.1); assumed universal and fully escaping.
axioms (7)
  • ad hoc to paper All dark matter is FLS Q-balls in a dark sector coupled to the SM only by gravity.
    Sec. 2.2 and 3.1; production mechanism not fixed, only assumed to yield mostly charge Q0.
  • domain assumption At z0 the halo is pure NFW and thereafter evolves as an isolated closed system without halo mergers.
    Sec. 3.1; explicitly a toy-model choice that removes hierarchical assembly.
  • ad hoc to paper At each radius all Q-balls share one characteristic charge Q(t,r) and merge with relative speed set by isotropic Jeans σ_r.
    Sec. 3.1–3.2, Eqs. 3.4–3.5; collapses the charge and velocity distribution to a single fluid-like ODE.
  • domain assumption Mergers use geometric cross section with ~50% coalescence probability; post-merger excess energy is promptly radiated as free-streaming relativistic φ.
    Eqs. 3.1, 3.3 and text in Sec. 3.1–3.2; imported from prior soliton-collision literature and thin-wall energetics.
  • domain assumption Thin-wall FLS relations M_Q ∝ v Q^{3/4}, R_Q ∝ Q^{1/4}/v hold for the macroscopic charges of interest.
    Eqs. 2.2–2.3; standard for large-Q FLS Q-balls, used everywhere in the evolution.
  • standard math Flat ΛCDM distances and critical density with fixed H0, ΩM, ΩΛ from Planck 2018.
    Eq. 3.9 and cosmology paragraph in Sec. 3.2.
  • domain assumption Bullet Cluster and microlensing bounds can be applied as hard cuts on σ̄_Q and M_{Q0} in this macroscopic-soliton setting.
    Sec. 4.1–4.2; maps particle SIDM and MACHO limits onto evolving Q-ball σ/m and mass.
invented entities (2)
  • Dark-sector FLS Q-ball dark matter (φ, χ with U(1) charge Q, no SM couplings except gravity) no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide macroscopic, charge-stabilized DM whose merger rate and σ/m evolve with density so that centers lose mass and form cores.
    Q-balls exist in many theories, but this specific all-DM, dark-only, equal-birth-charge cosmological population with the stated merger radiation channel is postulated for the mechanism.
  • Relativistic φ dark radiation from Q-ball merger mass defects no independent evidence
    purpose: Carry away rest-mass energy so the nonrelativistic density drops inside the cusp without violating charge conservation.
    Required by M(2Q)<2M(Q) plus the assumption that excess energy leaves the halo; no separate observational handle is given.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-daily-grok45 · 19337 in / 4728 out tokens · 88814 ms · 2026-07-31T04:51:41.071877+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Cold, collisionless dark matter successfully explains a wide range of observations, including the formation of large-scale structure. Nevertheless, tensions remain on small, galactic scales, most notably the cusp-core, or inner-mass-deficit, problem and the diversity of inner rotation-curve shapes and central densities at fixed halo mass. These observations suggest that additional dark-sector physics may affect the inner structure of halos, although no generally accepted explanation has yet emerged. Here, making use of a toy but representative model, we show that interacting dark-matter Q-balls -- non-topological solitons stabilized by a conserved charge -- can provide a natural mechanism for halo cusp flattening and may contribute to observed diversity of inner halo profiles. Produced in the early Universe in the dark sector, these Q-balls grow in the dense central regions of halos, while their interaction cross section decreases as the soliton mass increases. This process operates preferentially in halo centers, converting part of the rest-mass energy stored in massive Q-balls into relativistic dark-sector particles and thereby modifying the inner mass-density profile. The resulting density-dependent, self-regulating energy loss provides a dynamical mechanism for flattening halo cusps while leaving the outer halo largely unaffected.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 48 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Salucci,The distribution of dark matter in galaxies,Astron

    P. Salucci,The distribution of dark matter in galaxies,Astron. Astrophys. Rev.27(2019) 2 [1811.08843]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    Sales, A

    L.V. Sales, A. Wetzel and A. Fattahi,Baryonic solutions and challenges for cosmological models of dwarf galaxies,Nature Astron.6(2022) 897 [2206.05295]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Del Popolo and M

    A. Del Popolo and M. Le Delliou,Review of solutions to the cusp-core problem of theΛCDM model,Galaxies9(2021) 123 [2209.14151]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Flores and J.R

    R.A. Flores and J.R. Primack,Observational and theoretical constraints on singular dark matter halos,Astrophys. J. Lett.427(1994) L1 [astro-ph/9402004]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  5. [5]

    Moore,Evidence against dissipationless dark matter from observations of galaxy haloes, Nature370(1994) 629

    B. Moore,Evidence against dissipationless dark matter from observations of galaxy haloes, Nature370(1994) 629

    1994

  6. [6]

    Oman et al.,The unexpected diversity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves,Mon

    K.A. Oman et al.,The unexpected diversity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.452(2015) 3650 [1504.01437]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Zavala, M.R

    J. Zavala, M.R. Lovell, M. Vogelsberger and J.D. Burger,Diverse dark matter density at sub-kiloparsec scales in Milky Way satellites: Implications for the nature of dark matter,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 063007 [1904.09998]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Relatores, A.B

    N.C. Relatores, A.B. Newman, J.D. Simon, R.S. Ellis, P. Truong, L. Blitz et al.,The dark matter distributions in low-mass disk galaxies. II. The inner density profiles,Astrophys. J.887 (2019) 94 [1911.05836]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    Hayashi, Y

    K. Hayashi, Y. Kaneda, M. Mori and M. Shinozaki,Cusp-to-core transition of dark matter halos across galaxy mass scales,2507.22155

    arXiv

  10. [10]

    Navarro, V.R

    J.F. Navarro, V.R. Eke and C.S. Frenk,The cores of dwarf galaxy halos,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.283(1996) L72 [astro-ph/9610187]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  11. [11]

    Read and G

    J.I. Read and G. Gilmore,Mass loss from dwarf spheroidal galaxies: The Origins of shallow dark matter cores and exponential surface brightness profiles,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.356 (2005) 107 [astro-ph/0409565]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  12. [12]

    Pontzen and F

    A. Pontzen and F. Governato,How supernova feedback turns dark matter cusps into cores, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.421(2012) 3464 [1106.0499]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  13. [13]

    Kuzio de Naray, S.S

    R. Kuzio de Naray, S.S. McGaugh and W.J.G. de Blok,Mass models for low surface brightness galaxies with high resolution optical velocity fields,Astrophys. J.676(2008) 920 [0712.0860]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  14. [14]

    Oh et al.,High-resolution mass models of dwarf galaxies from LITTLE THINGS,Astron

    S.-H. Oh et al.,High-resolution mass models of dwarf galaxies from LITTLE THINGS,Astron. J.149(2015) 180 [1502.01281]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  15. [15]

    Di Cintio, C.B

    A. Di Cintio, C.B. Brook, A.V. Macciò, G.S. Stinson, A. Knebe, A.A. Dutton et al.,The dependence of dark matter profiles on the stellar-to-halo mass ratio: a prediction for cusps versus cores,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.437(2014) 415 [1306.0898]. – 14 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  16. [16]

    Koudmani, D

    S. Koudmani, D. Rennehan, R.S. Somerville, C.C. Hayward, D. Anglés-Alcázar, M.E. Orr et al.,Diverse dark matter profiles in FIRE dwarfs: black holes, cosmic rays and the cusp–core enigma,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.540(2025) 1928 [2409.02172]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Santos-Santos, J.F

    I.M.E. Santos-Santos, J.F. Navarro, A. Robertson, A. Benítez-Llambay, K.A. Oman, M.R. Lovell et al.,Baryonic clues to the puzzling diversity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.495(2020) 58 [1911.09116]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Spergel and P.J

    D.N. Spergel and P.J. Steinhardt,Observational evidence for selfinteracting cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.84(2000) 3760 [astro-ph/9909386]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  19. [19]

    Tulin and H.-B

    S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu,Dark matter self-interactions and small scale structure,Phys. Rept.730 (2018) 1 [1705.02358]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [21]

    Markevitch, A.H

    M. Markevitch, A.H. Gonzalez, D. Clowe, A. Vikhlinin, L. David, W. Forman et al.,Direct constraints on the dark matter self-interaction cross-section from the merging galaxy cluster 1E0657-56,Astrophys. J.606(2004) 819 [astro-ph/0309303]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  21. [22]

    Balberg, S.L

    S. Balberg, S.L. Shapiro and S. Inagaki,Selfinteracting dark matter halos and the gravothermal catastrophe,Astrophys. J.568(2002) 475 [astro-ph/0110561]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  22. [23]

    Kahlhoefer, M

    F. Kahlhoefer, M. Kaplinghat, T.R. Slatyer and C.-L. Wu,Diversity in density profiles of self-interacting dark matter satellite halos,JCAP12(2019) 010 [1904.10539]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  23. [24]

    Nadler, D

    E.O. Nadler, D. Yang and H.-B. Yu,A self-interacting dark matter solution to the extreme diversity of low-mass halo properties,Astrophys. J. Lett.958(2023) L39 [2306.01830]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [25]

    Roberts, M

    M.G. Roberts, M. Kaplinghat, M. Valli and H.-B. Yu,Gravothermal collapse and the diversity of galactic rotation curves,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 103041 [2407.15005]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [26]

    Meshveliani, J

    T. Meshveliani, J. Zavala and M.R. Lovell,Gravothermal collapse of self-interacting dark matter halos as the origin of intermediate mass black holes in Milky Way satellites,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 083010 [2210.01817]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [27]

    Hennawi and J.P

    J.F. Hennawi and J.P. Ostriker,Observational constraints on the self interacting dark matter scenario and the growth of supermassive black holes,Astrophys. J.572(2002) 41 [astro-ph/0108203]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  27. [28]

    Yang, Y.-L.S

    D. Yang, Y.-L.S. Tsai and Y.-Z. Fan,Diversifying halo structures in two-component self-interacting dark matter models via mass segregation,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083011 [2504.02303]

    arXiv 2025

  28. [29]

    Patil and M.S

    Y. Patil and M.S. Fischer,To collapse or not to collapse: Halo evolution with self-interacting dark matter mass segregation,2506.06272

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [30]

    Yang, Y.-Z

    D. Yang, Y.-Z. Fan, S. Hou and Y.-L.S. Tsai,Self-interacting dark matter with mass segregation: a unified explanation of dwarf cores and small-scale lenses,Sci. Bull.71(2026) 1349 [2506.14898]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  30. [31]

    Kusenko and P.J

    A. Kusenko and P.J. Steinhardt,Q ball candidates for selfinteracting dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 141301 [astro-ph/0106008]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  31. [32]

    Sanchez-Salcedo,The dark halo of NGC 5963 as a constraint on dark matter self-interaction at the low velocity regime,Astrophys

    F.J. Sanchez-Salcedo,The dark halo of NGC 5963 as a constraint on dark matter self-interaction at the low velocity regime,Astrophys. J.631(2005) 244 [astro-ph/0506345]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  32. [33]

    Friedberg, T.D

    R. Friedberg, T.D. Lee and A. Sirlin,Class of scalar-field soliton solutions in three space dimensions,Phys. Rev. D13(1976) 2739

    1976

  33. [34]

    Coleman,Q-balls,Nucl

    S.R. Coleman,Q-balls,Nucl. Phys. B262(1985) 263

    1985

  34. [35]

    Friedberg, T

    R. Friedberg, T. Lee and A. Sirlin,Gauge-field non-topological solitons in three space-dimensions (ii),Nuclear Physics B115(1976) 32. – 15 –

    1976

  35. [36]

    Troitsky,Supermassive dark-matter Q-balls in galactic centers?,JCAP11(2016) 027 [1510.07132]

    S. Troitsky,Supermassive dark-matter Q-balls in galactic centers?,JCAP11(2016) 027 [1510.07132]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [37]

    Kusenko and M.E

    A. Kusenko and M.E. Shaposhnikov,Supersymmetric Q balls as dark matter,Phys. Lett. B 418(1998) 46 [hep-ph/9709492]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  37. [38]

    Krylov, A

    E. Krylov, A. Levin and V. Rubakov,Cosmological phase transition, baryon asymmetry and dark matter Q-balls,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 083528 [1301.0354]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  38. [39]

    McDonald,Superheavy Q-Balls and Cosmology,2508.08931

    J. McDonald,Superheavy Q-Balls and Cosmology,2508.08931

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [40]

    Libanov,Can dark-matter Q-balls grow to the mass gap masses?,Phys

    A. Libanov,Can dark-matter Q-balls grow to the mass gap masses?,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 063540 [2412.08803]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [41]

    Ogiya, M

    G. Ogiya, M. Mori, T. Ishiyama and A. Burkert,The connection between the cusp-to-core transformation and observational universalities of DM halos,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.440 (2014) L71 [1309.1646]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  41. [42]

    Battye and P.M

    R.A. Battye and P.M. Sutcliffe,Q-ball dynamics,Nuclear Physics B590(2000) 329–363

    2000

  42. [43]

    Heeck and M

    J. Heeck and M. Sokhashvili,Revisiting the Friedberg–Lee–Sirlin soliton model,Eur. Phys. J. C 83(2023) 526 [2303.09566]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  43. [44]

    Ciurla, P

    D. Ciurla, P. Dorey, T. Romańczukiewicz and Y. Shnir,Perturbations of q-balls: from spectral structure to radiation pressure,Journal of High Energy Physics2024(2024)

    2024

  44. [45]

    Almumin, J

    Y. Almumin, J. Heeck, A. Rajaraman and C.B. Verhaaren,Excited q-balls,The European Physical Journal C82(2022)

    2022

  45. [46]

    Multamaki and I

    T. Multamaki and I. Vilja,Q Ball collisions in the MSSM: Gravity mediated supersymmetry breaking,Phys. Lett. B482(2000) 161 [hep-ph/0003270]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  46. [47]

    Multamaki and I

    T. Multamaki and I. Vilja,Q ball collisions in the MSSM: Gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking,Phys. Lett. B484(2000) 283 [hep-ph/0005162]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  47. [48]

    Navarro, C.S

    J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White,A universal density profile from hierarchical clustering,The Astrophysical Journal490(1997) 493–508

    1997

  48. [49]

    Diemer,COLOSSUS: A python toolkit for cosmology, large-scale structure, and dark matter halos,Astrophys

    B. Diemer,COLOSSUS: A python toolkit for cosmology, large-scale structure, and dark matter halos,Astrophys. J. Suppl.239(2018) 35 [1712.04512]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [50]

    Ishiyama et al.,The Uchuu simulations: Data Release 1 and dark matter halo concentrations,Mon

    T. Ishiyama et al.,The Uchuu simulations: Data Release 1 and dark matter halo concentrations,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.506(2021) 4210 [2007.14720]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  50. [51]

    Binney and S

    J. Binney and S. Tremaine,Galactic dynamics, Princeton university press (2011)

    2011

  51. [52]

    Balberg, S.L

    S. Balberg, S.L. Shapiro and S. Inagaki,Self-interacting dark matter halos and the gravothermal catastrophe,The Astrophysical Journal568(2002) 475–487

    2002

  52. [53]

    Aghanim, Y

    N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini et al.,Planck 2018 results,Astronomy and Astrophysics641(2020) A6

    2018

  53. [54]

    Adhikari et al.,Astrophysical tests of dark matter self-interactions,Rev

    S. Adhikari et al.,Astrophysical tests of dark matter self-interactions,Rev. Mod. Phys.97 (2025) 045004 [2207.10638]

    arXiv 2025

  54. [55]

    Nadler, A

    E.O. Nadler, A. Banerjee, S. Adhikari, Y.-Y. Mao and R.H. Wechsler,Signatures of velocity-dependent dark matter self-interactions in Milky Way-mass halos,Astrophys. J.896 (2020) 112 [2001.08754]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  55. [56]

    Silverman, J.S

    M. Silverman, J.S. Bullock, M. Kaplinghat, V.H. Robles and M. Valli,Motivations for a large self-interacting dark matter cross-section from Milky Way satellites,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.518(2022) 2418 [2203.10104]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  56. [57]

    Cho, M.J

    B.Y. Cho, M.J. Jee, H. Joo, S. Cha and K. HyeongHan,Joint jwst-decam lensing reveals that the bullet cluster is a minor merger, 2025. – 16 – [58]MACHO, EROScollaboration,EROS and MACHO combined limits on planetary mass dark matter in the galactic halo,Astrophys. J. Lett.499(1998) L9 [astro-ph/9803082]. [59]EROS-2collaboration,Limits on the MACHO content o...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [60]

    Griest, A.M

    K. Griest, A.M. Cieplak and M.J. Lehner,Experimental limits on primordial black hole dark matter from the first 2 yr of Kepler data,Astrophys. J.786(2014) 158 [1307.5798]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  58. [61]

    Smyth, S

    N. Smyth, S. Profumo, S. English, T. Jeltema, K. McKinnon and P. Guhathakurta,Updated constraints on asteroid-mass primordial black holes as dark matter,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 063005 [1910.01285]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  59. [62]

    Moliné et al.,ΛCDM halo substructure properties revealed with high-resolution and large-volume cosmological simulations,Mon

    Á. Moliné et al.,ΛCDM halo substructure properties revealed with high-resolution and large-volume cosmological simulations,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.518(2023) 157 [2110.02097]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  60. [63]

    Kaneda, M

    Y. Kaneda, M. Mori and K. Otaki,A universal scaling relation incorporating the cusp-to-core transition of dark matter haloes,2407.03614

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [64]

    Burkert,The structure of dark matter halos in dwarf galaxies,Astrophys

    A. Burkert,The structure of dark matter halos in dwarf galaxies,Astrophys. J. Lett.447 (1995) L25 [astro-ph/9504041]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  62. [65]

    Salucci and A

    P. Salucci and A. Burkert,Dark matter scaling relations,Astrophys. J. Lett.537(2000) L9 [astro-ph/0004397]. – 17 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000