Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 106 references

Chaos suppression via adaptive feedback control of intermittency: From exactly solvable ergodic maps to interacting microbubble clusters

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that intermittency can be suppressed, and chaos with it, by promoting the control parameter to a dynamical variable that follows a solvable chaotic reference map, with the collapse of positive q-generalized Lyapunov regions

desk verdict Interesting construction, but the closed-form λ_q fails an elementary zero-coupling check and the 'adaptive feedback' label doesn't match the mechanism. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.03754 v1 pith:XS6Q3ZNB submitted 2026-08-04 nlin.CD

Mohammad Yahyavi , Sina Gholizadeh , Sohrab Behnia , Bilal Tanatar This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.CD MSC 37D4537E0537C40 PACS 05.45.-a05.45.Gg
keywords intermittencychaoscontroladaptivefeedbackergodicmapsq-generalizedLyapunovexponentsmicrobubbleclustersKeller-Herringmodelinvariantmeasures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is trying to establish that intermittency regulation is a unifying, analytically solvable mechanism for chaos suppression. It promotes the system's control parameter to an autonomous dynamical variable that evolves under a reference map drawn from the same exactly solvable map hierarchy, so the controlled system itself has an exact invariant measure. On that basis it derives a closed-form q-generalized Lyapunov exponent whose positive regions collapse as the coupling strength increases, giving an initial-condition-independent signature that chaos has been suppressed. It then transfers the construction to a cluster of three ultrasound-driven microbubbles by modulating the driving frequency, and reports that intermittent chaotic oscillations are replaced by stable periodic motion. A reader should care because the paper supplies both a mechanism and the exact diagnostic for its success, not just simulations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the reference map R(alpha) = ((1+beta)/beta)^2 alpha/(1-alpha)^2, the N=2 member of the Chebyshev map hierarchy conjugate to the logistic map, used as the autonomous evolution law for the control parameter. Its exact invariant density, together with the conditional-density ansatz for the coupled map, factorizes the coupled-system invariant measure. The derived closed-form generalized Lyapunov exponent lambda_q(epsilon) = log_q Gamma(beta, epsilon) turns control efficacy into an explicit function of the coupling strength epsilon, so the suppression of intermittency can be read off analytically rather than from orbit sampling.

What would settle it

Iterate the coupled map Psi_3 from many random initial conditions for 10^8 steps at a nonzero coupling strength, build a two-dimensional histogram of (x, alpha), and compare it with the claimed factorized density mu(x|alpha) mu(alpha). A histogram that concentrates near the singular value alpha=1, or otherwise deviates from the predicted density, would show that the closed-form lambda_q(epsilon) does not govern typical trajectories. In the bubble system, impose the frequency-modulation law with a programmable waveform generator and test whether the predicted epsilon_t threshold actually replac

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that chaos can be suppressed by making the control parameter itself a chaotic dynamical variable, without using trajectory-triggered feedback. In a family of one-dimensional ergodic maps with exact Sinai-Ruelle-Bowen measures, it promotes the parameter to evolve under a reference map from the same Chebyshev hierarchy and derives the coupled system's invariant measure in factorized closed form. It then computes the q-generalized Lyapunov exponent as an explicit function of the coupling strength, and shows that the positive regions of this exponent collapse as coupling increases, which is an analytical, initial-condition-independent criterion for chaos suppression. The same co

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative results depend on the factorized invariant measure being the one that typical trajectories actually sample; the paper verifies the factorization solves the evolution equation but does not prove uniqueness or convergence from generic initial conditions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the map hierarchy, chaos suppression is certified analytically: lambda_q(epsilon) = log_q Gamma(beta, epsilon), and its positive regions collapse as epsilon grows, independent of initial conditions.
  • The control parameter never converges to a fixed value; its statistically stationary ergodic evolution is what reshapes the invariant measure and lengthens the laminar phases.
  • No orbit identification, local linearization, or trajectory-triggered perturbations are needed; the control is autonomous once the coupling strength is chosen.
  • The same reference-map construction gives a continuous-time flow for the acoustic driving frequency, so the microbubble application is a direct realization of the map-based mechanism rather than a separate heuristic.
  • In the Keller-Herring three-bubble cluster, adaptive frequency modulation shrinks the chaotic regions in pressure- and radius-bifurcation diagrams and produces stable periodic oscillations with two limit cycles.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the factorization ansatz describes the true invariant ensemble, the closed-form Gamma(beta, epsilon) could be used as a design curve for choosing coupling strength in other systems whose control parameter can be tied to a conjugate-map hierarchy, giving a tuning rule that needs no state estimation.
  • The method may extend to any experimental system where a parameter such as frequency, current, or forcing amplitude can be modulated by an ergodic reference signal, although exact validity would require new invariant-measure results beyond the one-dimensional hierarchy.
  • Because the generalized Lyapunov exponent is a topological invariant under conjugacy for the uncontrolled maps, analogous exact calculations may be possible for other members of the hierarchy (N not equal to 3), yielding a family of exactly solvable control models.
  • The cleanest experimental test is to impose the frequency-modulation flow with a programmable waveform generator on a cavitation setup and check whether the predicted epsilon_t threshold actually replaces intermittent bursts with the two stable limit cycles.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an adaptive control scheme for intermittency in which the control parameter is promoted to a dynamical variable that evolves under an auxiliary map from the same Chebyshev hierarchy as the controlled map. For the representative map Φ3, the control parameter α_m evolves under R(α)=[(1+β)/β]^2 α/(1−α)^2, and the state map uses an effective parameter g(α_m) built from η(α)=(1+εα)^2. The paper claims an exact factorized invariant measure for the coupled map and a closed-form q-generalized Lyapunov exponent Γ(β,ε), whose collapse of positive regions is presented as an initial-condition-independent order parameter for chaos suppression. The same construction is then applied to a three-interacting-microbubble Keller–Herring model by promoting the acoustic driving frequency to a dynamical variable; extensive bifurcation and Lyapunov analyses are said to show suppression of intermittent chaos.

Significance. If correct, the paper would provide an unusually clean exactly solvable mechanism for intermittency-based chaos control, with a closed-form analytical order parameter and a direct bridge to a realistic ultrasound-contrast-agent model. The manuscript is ambitious and self-contained: the invariant density of the control parameter is derived explicitly and verified against a 10^7-iteration histogram in Fig. 3; appendices supply detailed derivations; and the microbubble study covers wide parameter ranges. These are genuine strengths. However, several load-bearing algebraic and conceptual steps fail on inspection, so the central analytical claims are not supported by the material as written.

major comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III A, Eqs. (12)-(13)] Eq. (13) is not a solution of Eq. (12). Setting ε=0 gives η=1, so Eq. (12) reduces to 1/g^2=1/R^2, i.e., g(α_m)=R(α_m), whereas Eq. (13) gives g=1. Thus the displayed 'solving Eq. (12)' step is algebraically false, and the controlled map in Eq. (18), which uses Eq. (13), is not derived from the stated dynamical-consistency principle. This undermines the claim that the control law is not ad hoc.
  2. [Appendix D, Eq. (D4)] The derivation replaces the q-logarithm of a product in Eq. (D1) by a sum of q-logarithms in Eq. (D4). This is invalid for q≠1: log_q(ab)=log_q a + log_q b + (q−1)log_q a log_q b. Consequently the integral identity (D6)-(D7) does not yield the closed form in Eqs. (23)-(24). Since λ_q is the central analytical order parameter of the paper, this is a load-bearing error.
  3. [Sec. IV B, Eq. (24)] The zero-coupling limit of Eq. (24) is problematic. If the second denominator is read literally as 2β+√(3ε)/β, then Γ(β,0)=3/β^2; but at ε=0 the coupled map reduces to Φ3(x,1), whose exponent is log_q 3 by Eq. (7) with β=1, independent of β. If instead the denominator is read as (2β+√(3ε))/β, the limit is β-independent, but for β=1, ε=0.1 the formula gives Γ≈2.15>1, so λ_q>0 rather than the collapse shown in Fig. 5. In either reading, the printed formula cannot simultaneously satisfy the consistency limit and support the central collapse claim.
  4. [Sec. IV A and Appendix C] The factorized invariant measure in Eq. (C12) is only shown to satisfy the Frobenius-Perron equation under conditions (C17)-(C18). No uniqueness or convergence argument is supplied; the coupled map has indifferent fixed points, a laminar channel, and a singular line α=1, where additional invariant measures of the types discussed in Refs. [50-55] can coexist. Therefore the claim that λ_q is initial-condition-independent requires numerical or rigorous evidence that generic trajectories sample the factorized measure; none is provided for the coupled system.
  5. [Sec. V B, Eqs. (39)-(41)] The microbubble controller is not a feedback controller as defined in the paper: Eq. (39) for f(t) does not depend on the bubble state V, and in Eq. (40) the coupling is one-way from f to the bubble system. Also, f is identified in Eq. (36) with the dimensionless map variable, while P_dac(t)=P_a sin(2π f(t)t) in Eq. (41) requires physical frequency units; no scaling or reference frequency is provided. The claim that adaptive feedback suppresses microbubble intermittency is therefore not supported by the model as written.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table III] The control parameter ε is reported as 15 in every row, but Eq. (14) defines ε∈[0,1] and Fig. 6 uses ε_t=0.005 or 0.1. Clarify whether Table III refers to a different parameter or contains an error.
  2. [Fig. 13] Typographical errors in captions: 'Micobubble Radial' should be 'Microbubble Radial'.
  3. [Sec. II C, Eq. (8)] The notation α=N+0^− and α=1/N+0^+ is unusual; please specify the limiting direction explicitly and define the entropic-index convention used in the scaling factors.
  4. [Sec. II C, Eq. (7)] Eq. (7) is quoted from the authors' prior work [47]; please state clearly which parts of the generalized-Lyapunov derivation are new here and which rely on that reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the control construction, invariant-measure calculation, and microbubble simulations are self-contained; prior-work citations are independent parameter-free results, not fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's theoretical derivation starts from a defined coupled map Psi_N (Eq. 15) with control law g(alpha) (Eq. 13) and then solves the Frobenius-Perron equation with an explicit conditional-measure ansatz (Appendix C). The invariant measure is not assumed equal to the target lambda_q; it is verified by substitution into the FP equation. The generalized Lyapunov exponent (Eqs. 21-24) is a closed-form consequence of that measure, not a fitted quantity. No data are used to set beta or epsilon in the map-theoretic part; the microbubble application is an independent numerical simulation of the Keller-Herring model with all parameters tabulated. The uncontrolled lambda_q (Eq. 7) is cited to Refs. [34,47], including prior work by the authors, but it is a parameter-free published result with stated assumptions (exact SRB measure of the Chebyshev hierarchy) and does not incorporate the control target; moreover Appendix B re-derives it from the invariant measure. Hence the self-citation is not load-bearing. A caveat that belongs to correctness rather than circularity: Eq. (13) is not algebraically implied by Eq. (12) (at epsilon=0 the former gives g=1, the latter g=R), and Eq. (24) does not pass the epsilon=0 consistency check for beta != 1. These are derivation/consistency errors, not equivalence-by-construction. Accordingly no circular step meeting the quoted-evidence standard is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's analytical results rely on a self-cited hierarchy of maps with exact measures; the control construction is engineered to fit a factorization ansatz; the microbubble application imports a standard physical model without new entities.

free parameters (4)
  • beta
    Parameter of the map hierarchy controlling the invariant measure; related to the nominal alpha by alpha=(3 beta+1)/(beta+3). Varied to explore intermittency boundaries; not fitted to data.
  • epsilon = 0.001, 0.003, 0.1 used in figures
    Coupling strength in the map control, chosen by hand to demonstrate suppression; the central result lambda_q(epsilon) depends on it.
  • epsilon_t = 0.005, 0.1 in figures; 15 in Table III (inconsistent)
    Time-scale of the frequency flow in the microbubble control; a design parameter.
  • nominal alpha = 0.334, 2.999 in Fig. 1
    Control parameter of the uncontrolled map; determines beta via the algebraic relation.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Exact invariant (SRB) measure of the map hierarchy, Eq. (A2), and the algebraic relation between alpha and beta, Eqs. (A3)-(A5).
    Taken from Refs [34-39] (self-cited prior work); unproved here, central to all subsequent calculations.
  • standard math The q-generalized Lyapunov exponent definition Eq. (5) and the integral identity Eq. (D6) from Refs [34,35].
    Background results used to evaluate the integrals.
  • ad hoc to paper Factorization ansatz for the coupled invariant measure, Eq. (C12) with conditions (C17)-(C18).
    Introduced to solve the FP equation; verified for consistency but not uniqueness.
  • ad hoc to paper The conversion from the conjugate map to the flow Eq. (39) via the discrete-time deviation and continuum limit.
    Heuristic; the flow is not uniquely determined by the map structure.
  • domain assumption Keller-Herring model with Morgan shell parameters, Table I, and negligible propagation delay.
    Standard bubble dynamics model; parameter values from literature; delay ignored per tau<T.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chaos suppression via adaptive feedback control of intermittency: From exactly solvable ergodic maps to interacting microbubble clusters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XS6Q3ZNB

@misc{pith2026260803754,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chaos suppression via adaptive feedback control of intermittency: From exactly solvable ergodic maps to interacting microbubble clusters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XS6Q3ZNB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03754}
}
abstract

Intermittency represents a fundamental route to chaos in nonlinear dynamical systems. In this work we introduce an adaptive control strategy in which the control parameter of an intermittent system is promoted to a dynamical variable that evolves autonomously under an auxiliary nonlinear map drawn from the same functional hierarchy as the system itself. The construction eliminates the need for orbit identification, local linearization, and trajectory-triggered perturbations, which are central ingredients of conventional feedback schemes. The theoretical framework is developed within a class of one-dimensional nonlinear ergodic maps with exactly known invariant (Sinai--Ruelle--Bowen) measures, for which we derive in closed form (i) the dynamics and invariant measure of the evolving control parameter, (ii) the invariant measure of the coupled system, and (iii) the $q$-generalized Lyapunov exponents before and after control. The generalized Lyapunov spectrum serves as an analytical order parameter for the control process: the collapse of its positive regions provides a quantitative and initial-condition-independent signature of chaos suppression, and yields the sensitivity to initial conditions in explicit form. To establish the physical relevance of the approach beyond low-dimensional maps, we apply the same construction to a cluster of three interacting ultrasound-driven microbubbles described by the Keller--Herring model, promoting the experimentally accessible acoustic driving frequency to a dynamical variable. Systematic bifurcation and Lyapunov analyses, performed over wide ranges of driving pressure, frequency, and equilibrium radii, demonstrate that intermittent chaotic radial oscillations are progressively suppressed and replaced by stable periodic motion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.03754 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) displays two typical time series of length 2000 for α = 0.334 and α = 2.999, corresponding to two distinct regions within the chaotic regime. In both cases, the dynamics are characterized by long laminar phases interrupted by irregular chaotic bursts, reflect￾ing the hallmark features of intermittency. For param￾eter values below the critical point, α < αc, the system exhibits regular behavior associated with a … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Enlargement of Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: illustrates the behavior of the generalized Lyapunov exponent under intermittency control. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Bifurcation diagrams and (b) the corresponding Lyapunov spectra of the normalized three-bubble radii as functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Bifurcation diagrams and (b) the corresponding Lyapunov spectra of the normalized radii of a three-microbubble [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Bifurcation diagrams and (b) the corresponding Lyapunov spectrum of the normalized three-bubble radius as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Bifurcation diagrams of the normalized three-bubble radius as a function of (a) the initial radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Bifurcation diagrams of the normalized three-bubble radius driven by a 2 MHz acoustic field with initial radii [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Lyapunov spectra of the normalized three-bubble [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Time series and state-space trajectories of the normalized three-bubble radius for initial radii [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Time series and state-space trajectories of the normalized three-bubble radius for initial radii [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Bifurcation diagrams of the normalized three-bubble [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Computation of Lyapunov exponents One of the most effective approaches for characterizing the dynamical behavior of microbubble oscillations is the computation of the Lyapunov-exponent spectrum. Lya- punov exponents quantify the sensitivity of a dynamical system to initial conditions by measuring the exponential rates of divergence or convergence of nearb...

  2. [2]

    A bifurcation is defined as a qualitative change in the system dynamics induced by variation of a control parameter

    Computation of bifurcation diagrams Transitions from periodic motion to chaos typically oc- cur through well-known routes such as period doubling, quasiperiodicity, and intermittency, all of which origi- nate from local bifurcations. A bifurcation is defined as a qualitative change in the system dynamics induced by variation of a control parameter. To vis...

  3. [3]

    J. R. Dorfman, An Introduction to Chaos in Nonequi- librium Statistical Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1999. 27

    1999

  4. [4]

    Kobrin,et al., Many-body chaos in the Sachdev-Ye- Kitaev model,Phys

    B. Kobrin,et al., Many-body chaos in the Sachdev-Ye- Kitaev model,Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 030602 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Haase,et al., Exponential and power-law kinetics in single-molecule fluorescence intermittency,J

    H. Haase,et al., Exponential and power-law kinetics in single-molecule fluorescence intermittency,J. Phys. Chem. B108, 10445 (2004)

    2004

  6. [6]

    Brokmann,et al., Statistical aging and nonergodicity in the fluorescence of single nanocrystals,Phys

    X. Brokmann,et al., Statistical aging and nonergodicity in the fluorescence of single nanocrystals,Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 120601 (2003)

    2003

  7. [7]

    Akimoto,et al., Characterization of intermittency in renewal processes: Application to earthquakes,Phys

    T. Akimoto,et al., Characterization of intermittency in renewal processes: Application to earthquakes,Phys. Rev. E81, 031133 (2010)

    2010

  8. [8]

    M. Sano, K. Tamai, A universal transition to turbulence in channel flow,Nature Phys12, 249–253 (2016)

    2016

Show all 106 references
  1. [9]

    Elaskar, and E

    S. Elaskar, and E. del R ´ ıo, Review of chaotic intermit- tency,Symmetry15(6), 1195 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    K. V. Kiran,et al., Onset of intermittency and mul- tiscaling in active turbulence,Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 088302 (2025)

    2025

  3. [11]

    Manneville, and Y

    P. Manneville, and Y. Pomeau, Intermittency and the Lorenz model,Phys. Lett. A75, 1 (1979)

    1979

  4. [12]

    Pomeau, and P

    Y. Pomeau, and P. Manneville, Intermittent transition to turbulence in dissipative dynamical systems,Com- mun Math Phys.74, 189 (1980)

    1980

  5. [13]

    Elaskar,et al., Chaotic intermittency as a random telegraphic signal,Chaos Solitons Fractals199, 116650 (2025)

    S. Elaskar,et al., Chaotic intermittency as a random telegraphic signal,Chaos Solitons Fractals199, 116650 (2025)

    2025

  6. [14]

    Grebogi, E

    C. Grebogi, E. Ott, F. Romeiras, and J.A. Yorke, Crit- ical exponents for crisis-induced intermittency,Phys. Rev. A36, 5365 (1987)

    1987

  7. [15]

    Platt, E.A

    N. Platt, E.A. Spiegel, and C. Tresser, On-off intermit- tency: A mechanism for bursting,Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 279 (1993)

    1993

  8. [16]

    D. Choi,et al., Multistate intermittency on the route to chaos of a semiconductor laser subjected to optical feedback from a long external cavity,Chaos: An Inter- disciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science28(1), 011102 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Loiseau, J.C

    J.C. Loiseau, J.C. Robinet, and E. Leriche, Intermit- tency and transition to chaos in the cubical lid-driven cavity flow,Fluid Dynamics Research,48(6), 061421 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    Arecchi, R

    F.T. Arecchi, R. Badii, and A. Politi, Scaling of first passage times for noise induced crises,Phys. Lett. A 103, 3 (1984)

    1984

  11. [19]

    Hramov, A.A

    A.E. Hramov, A.A. Koronovskii, M.K. Kurovskaya, and O.I. Moskalenko, Type-I intermittency with noise versus eyelet intermittency,Phys. Lett. A375, 1646 (2011)

    2011

  12. [20]

    Wu, and Da-R

    S. Wu, and Da-R. He, Intermittency between type I and type V in some quasi-discontinuous systems,J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.70, 69 (2001)

    2001

  13. [21]

    Kaneda, and K

    Y. Kaneda, and K. Morishita, Intermittency of energy dissipation in high-resolution direct numerical simula- tion of turbulence,J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.76, 073401 (2007)

    2007

  14. [22]

    J. Cai, Y. Harada, M. Chiba, and T. Hirata, Intermit- tency in magnon systems near the onset of the second- order Suhl instability,J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.72, 2967 (2003)

    2003

  15. [23]

    Watanabe, and H

    T. Watanabe, and H. Fujisaka, Asymptotic behavior of the q-th order intermittency exponent in fully developed turbulence,J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.691672 (2000)

    2000

  16. [24]

    H. Li, L. Yang, and D. Huang, The study of the inter- mittency test filtering character of Hilbert-Huang trans- form,Mathematics and Computers in Simulation7022 (2005)

    2005

  17. [25]

    Mukherjee,et al., Intermittency, fluctuations and maximal chaos in an emergent universal state of active turbulence,Nat

    S. Mukherjee,et al., Intermittency, fluctuations and maximal chaos in an emergent universal state of active turbulence,Nat. Phys.19, 891–897 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Kanchana, P

    C. Kanchana, P. G. Siddheshwar and D. Laroze, Control of chaos and intermittent periodic motions in Rayleigh- B´ enard convection using a feedback controller,Nonlin- ear Dyn113, 7297 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    Gac, and J.J

    J.M. Gac, and J.J. Zebrowski, Nonstationary Pomeau- Manneville intermittency in systems with a periodic pa- rameter change,Phys. Rev. E73, 066203 (2006)

    2006

  20. [28]

    Nagai, X.D

    Y. Nagai, X.D. Hua, and Y.C. Lai, Controlling on-off intermittent dynamics,Phys. Rev. E541190 (1996)

    1996

  21. [29]

    E. Ott, C. Grebogi, and J.A. Yorke, Controlling chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett.641196 (1990)

    1990

  22. [30]

    Reategui, and A.N

    R.J. Reategui, and A.N. Pisarchik, Control of on-off in- termittency by slow parametric modulation,Phys. Rev. E69067203 (2004)

    2004

  23. [31]

    Kacperski, and J.A

    K. Kacperski, and J.A. Holyst, Control of crisis-induced intermittency in the dynamics of a kicked, damped spin, Phys. Rev. E55, 5044 (1997)

    1997

  24. [32]

    Zambrano, I.P Mariˇ no, and M.A.F Sanju´ an, Control- ling crisis-induced intermittency using its relation with a boundary crisis,New Journal of Physics11, 023025 (2009)

    S. Zambrano, I.P Mariˇ no, and M.A.F Sanju´ an, Control- ling crisis-induced intermittency using its relation with a boundary crisis,New Journal of Physics11, 023025 (2009)

    2009

  25. [33]

    Chen, Controlling chaos and bifurcations in en- gineering systems, CRC press, 1999

    Ed.G. Chen, Controlling chaos and bifurcations in en- gineering systems, CRC press, 1999

    1999

  26. [34]

    Ding,et al., Controlling chaos in high dimensions: Theory and experiment,Phys

    M. Ding,et al., Controlling chaos in high dimensions: Theory and experiment,Phys. Rev. E53, 4334 (1996)

    1996

  27. [35]

    Boukabou, and N

    A. Boukabou, and N. Mekircha, Generalized chaos con- trol and synchronization by nonlinear high-order ap- proach,Mathematics and Computers in Simulation82 2268 (2012)

    2012

  28. [36]

    Jafarizadeh, S

    M.A. Jafarizadeh, S. Behnia, S. Khorram, and H. Naghshara, Hierarchy of chaotic maps with an invari- ant measure,Journal of statistical physics104, 1013 (2001)

    2001

  29. [37]

    Jafarizadeh and S

    M.A. Jafarizadeh and S. Behnia, Hierarchy of chaotic maps with an invariant measure and their coupling, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena159, 1 (2001)

    2001

  30. [38]

    Jafarizadeh and S

    M.A. Jafarizadeh and S. Behnia, Hierarchy of chaotic maps with an invariant measure and their composi- tions,Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics9, 26 (2002)

    2002

  31. [39]

    Jafarizadeh and S

    M.A. Jafarizadeh and S. Behnia, Hierarchy of one- and many-parameter families of elliptic chaotic maps of cn and sn types,Physics Letters A310, 168 (2003)

    2003

  32. [40]

    Jafarizadeh, S

    M.A. Jafarizadeh, S. Behnia, and M. Foroutan, Hierar- chy of piecewise non-linear maps with non-ergodic be- haviour,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Gen- eral37, 9403 (2004)

    2004

  33. [41]

    Jafarizadeh, S

    M.A. Jafarizadeh, S. Behnia, E. Faizi, and S. Ahad- pour, Generalized N-coupled maps with invariant mea- sure in Bose-Mesner algebra perspective,Pramana70, 417 (2008)

    2008

  34. [42]

    YuanDong,et al., Bifurcation and chaos of a new discrete fractional-order logistic map,Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation57, 352 (2018)

    Ji. YuanDong,et al., Bifurcation and chaos of a new discrete fractional-order logistic map,Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation57, 352 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Baldovin, and A

    F. Baldovin, and A. Robledo, Universal renormalization-group dynamics at the onset of chaos in logistic maps and nonextensive statistical mechanics,Phys. Rev. E66, 045104 (2002)

    2002

  36. [44]

    Baldovin, and A

    F. Baldovin, and A. Robledo, Nonextensive Pesin iden- tity: Exact renormalization group analytical results for 28 the dynamics at the edge of chaos of the logistic map, Phys. Rev. E69, 045202 (2004)

    2004

  37. [45]

    Mayoral, and A

    E. Mayoral, and A. Robledo, Multifractality and nonex- tensivity at the edge of chaos of unimodal maps,Physica A340, 219 (2004)

    2004

  38. [46]

    Robledo, Criticality in nonlinear one-dimensional maps: RG universal map and nonextensive entropy, Physica D193, 153 (2004)

    A. Robledo, Criticality in nonlinear one-dimensional maps: RG universal map and nonextensive entropy, Physica D193, 153 (2004)

    2004

  39. [47]

    Baldovin, and A

    F. Baldovin, and A. Robledo, Sensitivity to initial condi- tions at bifurcations in one-dimensional nonlinear maps: Rigorous nonextensive solutions,Europhys. Lett.60, 518 (2002)

    2002

  40. [48]

    M. L. Lyra, and C. Tsallis, Nonextensivity and multi- fractality in low-dimensional dissipative systems,Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 53 (1998)

    1998

  41. [49]

    Behnia, and M

    S. Behnia, and M. Yahyavi, Characterization of inter- mittency in hierarchy of chaotic maps with invariant measure,J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.81, 124008 (2012)

    2012

  42. [50]

    Prosperetti, and A

    A. Prosperetti, and A. Lezzi, Bubble dynamics in a compressible liquid. Part 1. First-order theory,J. Fluid Mech.168, 457 (1986)

    1986

  43. [51]

    Burns, Harmonic imaging with ultrasound contrast agents,Clin

    P.N. Burns, Harmonic imaging with ultrasound contrast agents,Clin. Radiol.51, 50-55 (1996)

    1996

  44. [52]

    Hu, L.-S

    H. Hu, L.-S. Young, Nonexistence of SBR measures for some diffeomorphisms that are ’almost Anosov’,Ergod. Theory Dyn. Syst.15, 67 (1995)

    1995

  45. [53]

    Thaler, A limit theorem for sojourns near indiffer- ent fixed points of one-dimensional maps,Ergod

    M. Thaler, A limit theorem for sojourns near indiffer- ent fixed points of one-dimensional maps,Ergod. Theory Dyn. Syst.22, 1289 (2002)

    2002

  46. [54]

    Aaronson, An introduction to infinite ergodic theory, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs Vol

    J. Aaronson, An introduction to infinite ergodic theory, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs Vol. 50 (Amer- ican Mathematical Society, Providence) 1997

    1997

  47. [55]

    Zweim¨ uller, Ergodic structure and invariant densities of non-Markovian interval maps with indifferent fixed points,Nonlinearity11, 1263 (1998)

    R. Zweim¨ uller, Ergodic structure and invariant densities of non-Markovian interval maps with indifferent fixed points,Nonlinearity11, 1263 (1998)

    1998

  48. [56]

    Boyarsky, Continuity of Invariant Measures for Fam- ilies of Mappings,Advances in Applied Mathematics6, 113 (1985)

    A. Boyarsky, Continuity of Invariant Measures for Fam- ilies of Mappings,Advances in Applied Mathematics6, 113 (1985)

    1985

  49. [57]

    Tisseur, Density of Periodic Points, Invariant Mea- sures and Almost Equicontinuous Points of Cellular Automata,Advances in Applied Mathematics42, 504 (2009)

    P. Tisseur, Density of Periodic Points, Invariant Mea- sures and Almost Equicontinuous Points of Cellular Automata,Advances in Applied Mathematics42, 504 (2009)

    2009

  50. [58]

    Tasaki, Z

    S. Tasaki, Z. Suchanecki, and I. Antoniou, Ergodic Properties of Piecewise Linear Maps on Fractal Re- pellers,Physics Letters A179, 103 (1993)

    1993

  51. [59]

    Tasaki, T

    S. Tasaki, T. Gilbert, and J.R. Dorfman, An Analyti- cal Construction of the SRB Measures for Baker-Type Maps,Chaos8, 424 (1998)

    1998

  52. [60]

    Jakobson, Absolutely Continuous Invariant Mea- sures for One-Parameter Families of One-Dimensional Maps,Communications in Mathematical Physics81, 39 (1981)

    M.V. Jakobson, Absolutely Continuous Invariant Mea- sures for One-Parameter Families of One-Dimensional Maps,Communications in Mathematical Physics81, 39 (1981)

    1981

  53. [61]

    Cornfeld, S.V

    I.P. Cornfeld, S.V. Fomin, Ya.G. Sinai, Ergodic Theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982

    1982

  54. [62]

    Grassberger, and M

    P. Grassberger, and M. Scheunert, Some more universal scaling laws for critical mappings,J. Stat. Phys.26697 (1981)

    1981

  55. [63]

    Schneider, A

    T. Schneider, A. Politi, and D. Wurtz, Resistance and eigenstates in a tight-binding model with quasiperiodic potential,Z. Phys. B66469 (1987)

    1987

  56. [64]

    Anania, and A

    G. Anania, and A. Politi, Dynamical behavior at the onset of chaos,Europhys. Lett.7119 (1988)

    1988

  57. [65]

    H. Hata, T. Horita, and H. Mori, Dynamic description of the critical 2 ∞ attractor and 2 m-band chaos,Progr. Theoret. Phys.82897 (1989)

    1989

  58. [66]

    Tsallis, Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics,J

    C. Tsallis, Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics,J. Stat. Phys.52479 (1988)

    1988

  59. [67]

    Tsallis, in: S

    C. Tsallis, in: S. Abe, Y. Okamota (Eds.), Nonextensive statistical mechanics and its applications, Lecture Notes in Physics, (Springer, Berlin 560, 2001)

    2001

  60. [68]

    Tsallis, A.R

    C. Tsallis, A.R. Plastino, and W.-M. Zheng, Power-law sensitivity to initial conditions – New entropic represen- tation,Chaos Solitons Fractals8885 (1997)

    1997

  61. [69]

    Costa, M.L

    U.M.S. Costa, M.L. Lyra, A.R. Plastino, and C. Tsal- lis, Power-law sensitivity to initial conditions within a logisticlike family of maps: Fractality and nonextensiv- ity,Phys. Rev. E56245 (1997)

    1997

  62. [70]

    Tirnakli, C

    U. Tirnakli, C. Tsallis, and M.L. Lyra, Circular-like maps: Sensitivity to the initial conditions, multifractal- ity and nonextensivity,Eur. Phys. J. B11309 (1999)

    1999

  63. [71]

    Ignaccolo, P

    M. Ignaccolo, P. Grigolini, and A. Rosa, Sporadic ran- domness: The transition from the stationary to the non- stationary condition,Phys. Rev. E64026210 (2001)

    2001

  64. [72]

    Manneville:Dissipative structures and weak turbu- lence,(Academic Press, Boston, 1990)

    P. Manneville:Dissipative structures and weak turbu- lence,(Academic Press, Boston, 1990)

    1990

  65. [73]

    Takahira, S

    H. Takahira, S. Yamane, T. Akamatsu, Nonlinear Oscil- lations of a Cluster of Bubbles in a Sound Field (Bifur- cation Structure),JSME Int. J. Ser. B38, 432 (1995)

    1995

  66. [74]

    Morgan, J.S

    K.E. Morgan, J.S. Allen, P.A. Dayton, J.E. Chomas, A.L. Klibanov, K.W. Ferrara, Experimental and The- oretical Evaluation of Microbubble Behavior: Effect of Transmitted Phase and Bubble Size,IEEE Trans. Ul- trason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control47, 1494 (2000)

    2000

  67. [75]

    de Jong, R

    N. de Jong, R. Cornet, and C.T. Lancee, Higher Har- monics of Vibrating Gas-Filled Microspheres. Part One: Simulations,Ultrasonics32, 447 (1994)

    1994

  68. [76]

    Church, The Effects of an Elastic Solid Surface Layer on the Radial Pulsations of Gas Bubbles,J

    C.C. Church, The Effects of an Elastic Solid Surface Layer on the Radial Pulsations of Gas Bubbles,J. Acoust. Soc. Am.97, 1510 (1995)

    1995

  69. [77]

    Macdonald, and J

    C.A. Macdonald, and J. Gomatam, Chaotic Dynam- ics of Microbubbles in Ultrasonic Fields,Proc. IMechE. 220, 333 (2006)

    2006

  70. [78]

    Mettin, I

    R. Mettin, I. Akhatov, U. Parlitz, C.D. Ohl, and W. Lauterborn, Bjerknes forces between small cavitation bubbles in a strong acoustic field,Phys. Rev. E56, 2924 (1997)

    1997

  71. [79]

    Behnia, H

    S. Behnia, H. Zahir, M. Yahyavi, A. Barzegar, and F. Mobadersani, Observations on the Dynamics of Bubble Cluster in an Ultrasonic Field,Nonlinear Dynamics72, 561 (2013)

    2013

  72. [80]

    Behnia, F

    S. Behnia, F. Mobadersani, M. Yahyavi, and A. Rezavand, Chaotic Behavior of Gas Bubble in Non- Newtonian Fluid: A Numerical Study,Nonlinear Dy- namics74, 559 (2013)

    2013

  73. [81]

    Behnia, F

    S. Behnia, F. Mobadersani, M. Yahyavi, A. Rezavand, N. Hoesinpour, and A. Ezzat, Effect of Magnetic Field on the Radial Pulsations of a Gas Bubble in a Non- Newtonian Fluid,Chaos, Solitons & Fractals78, 194 (2015)

    2015

  74. [82]

    Behnia, M

    S. Behnia, M. Yahyavi, and R. Habibpourbisafar, As- sociation Schemes Perspective of Microbubble Cluster in Ultrasonic Fields,Ultrasonics Sonochemistry44, 45 (2018)

    2018

  75. [83]

    Behnia, M

    S. Behnia, M. Yahyavi, R. Habibpourbisafar, and F. Mottaghi, Study of Encapsulated Microbubble Cluster Based on Association Schemes Perspective,Ultrasonics Sonochemistry52, 131 (2019)

    2019

  76. [84]

    Ghalichi, S

    F. Ghalichi, S. Behnia, F. Mottaghi, and M. Yahyavi, 29 Numerical Study on a Polymer-Shelled Microbubble Submerged in Soft Tissue,Physica Scripta95, 085215 (2020)

    2020

  77. [85]

    Behnia, M

    S. Behnia, M. Yahyavi, F. Mobadersani, Intelligent controlling microbubble radial oscillations by using Slave–Master Feedback control,Applied Mathematics and Computation245, 404 (2014)

    2014

  78. [86]

    Pyragas, Continuous Control of Chaos by Self- Controlling Feedback,Phys Lett A170, 421 (1992)

    K. Pyragas, Continuous Control of Chaos by Self- Controlling Feedback,Phys Lett A170, 421 (1992)

    1992

  79. [87]

    Meucci, D

    R. Meucci, D. Cinotti, E. Allaria, L. Billings, I. Triandaf, D. Morgan, and I. B. Schwartz, Global Man- ifold Control in a Driven Laser: Sustaining Chaos and Regular Dynamics,Physica D189, 70 (2004)

    2004

  80. [88]

    Parlitz, V

    U. Parlitz, V. Englisch, C. Scheffczyk, and W. Lauter- born, Bifurcation Structure of Bubble Oscillators,J Acoust Soc Am88, 1061 (1990)

    1990

  81. [89]

    Smereka, On the motion of bubbles in a periodic box, J

    P. Smereka, On the motion of bubbles in a periodic box, J. Fluid Mech.254, 79 (1993)

    1993

  82. [90]

    Sangani, and A.K

    A.S. Sangani, and A.K. Didwana, Dynamic simulations of flows of bubbly liquids at large Reynolds numbers,J. Fluid Mech.250, 307 (1993)

    1993

  83. [91]

    Sugiyama, S

    K. Sugiyama, S. Takagi, and Y. Matsumoto, Multi-scale analysis of bubbly flows,Comp. Meth. in App. Mech. and Eng.191, 689 (2001)

    2001

  84. [92]

    Mazzitelli, and D

    I.M. Mazzitelli, and D. Lohse, Evolution of energy in flow driven by rising bubbles,Phys. Rev. E79, 066317 (2009)

    2009

  85. [93]

    Cartellier, and N

    A. Cartellier, and N. Rivi´ ere, Bubble-induced agitation and microstructure in uniform bubbly flows at small to moderate particle Reynolds numbers,Phys. Fluids13, 2165 (2001)

    2001

  86. [94]

    Risso, and K

    F. Risso, and K. Ellingsen, Velocity fluctuations in a ho- mogeneous dilute dispersion of high-Reynolds-number rising bubbles,J. Fluid Mech.453, 395 (2002)

    2002

  87. [95]

    Zenit, D.L

    R. Zenit, D.L. Koch, and A.S. Sangani, Measurements of the average properties of a suspension of bubbles ris- ing in a vertical channel,J. Fluid Mech.429, 307 (2001)

    2001

  88. [96]

    Roig, and A

    V. Roig, and A. de Tournemine, Measurement of inter- stitial velocity of homogeneous bubbly flows at low to moderate void fraction,J. Fluid Mech.572, 87 (2007)

    2007

  89. [97]

    Chatzidai, Y

    N. Chatzidai, Y. Dimakopoulos, and J. Tsamopoulos, Viscous effects on the oscillations of two equal and de- formable bubbles under a step change in pressure,J. Fluid Mech.673. 513 (2011)

    2011

  90. [98]

    Ida, Bubble-bubble interaction: A potential source of cavitation noise,Phys

    M. Ida, Bubble-bubble interaction: A potential source of cavitation noise,Phys. Rev. E79, 016307 (2009)

    2009

  91. [99]

    Kyriakou,et

    Z. Kyriakou,et. al., HIFU-Induced Cavitation and Heating in Ex Vivo Porcine Subcutaneous Fat,Ultra- sound in Med.&Biol.37, 568 (2011)

    2011

  92. [100]

    E. Saw, R. Shaw, S. Ayyalasomayajula, P. Chuang, and A. Gylfason, Inertial clustering of particles in high- Reynolds-number turbulence,Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 214501 (2008)

    2008

  93. [101]

    Aliseda, A

    A. Aliseda, A. Cartellier, F. Hainaux, and J. Lasheras, Effect of preferential concentration on the settling ve- locity of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic tur- bulence,J. Fluid Mech.468, 77 (2002)

    2002

  94. [102]

    Monchaux, M

    R. Monchaux, M. Bourgoin, and A. Cartellier, Prefer- ential concentration of heavy particles: A Vorono ¨ ı anal- ysis,Phys. Fluids22, 103304 (2010)

    2010

  95. [103]

    Calzavarini, M

    E. Calzavarini, M. Kerscher, D. Lohse, and F. Toschi, Dimensionality and morphology of particle and bubble clusters in turbulent flow,J. Fluid Mech.60713 (2008)

    2008

  96. [104]

    Ott, Chaos in Dynamical System, Cambridge Uni- versity Press New York, 2002

    E. Ott, Chaos in Dynamical System, Cambridge Uni- versity Press New York, 2002

    2002

  97. [105]

    A. Wolf, J. B. Swift, H. L. Swinney, A. Vastano, Deter- mining Lyapunov exponents from a time series,Physica D16D285 (1985)

    1985

  98. [106]

    Simon, P

    G. Simon, P. Cvitanovic, M. T. Levinsen, I. Csabai, and A. Horvath, Periodic orbit theory applied to a chaoti- cally oscillating gas bubble in water,Nonlinearity15, 25 (2002)

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.