Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 92 references

Profile Analysis of the Multiwavelength 2.1-year Oscillations of PG 1553+113

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read PG 1553+113's ~2.1-year oscillation is a broad activity envelope whose internal shape changes from cycle to cycle and band to band—not a single repeating wave.

desk verdict Useful empirical census of the PG 1553+113 oscillation shapes, but the headline X-ray M6 result rests on sparse sampling and needs an injection-recovery check. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.03947 v1 pith:LUGJ4DUO submitted 2026-08-04 astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords blazarPG1553+1132.1-yearperiodicitymultiwavelengthvariabilityoscillationprofilemorphologysupermassiveblackholebinaryBayesianmodelselection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish what the well-known ~2.1-year rhythm of the blazar PG 1553+113—a galaxy whose jet is aimed nearly at Earth—looks like as a shape, not just as a period. Cutting the gamma-ray, X-ray, UV, and optical light curves into individual cycles and fitting each with thirteen analytical profiles, the authors show the oscillation is a broad activity envelope carrying shorter-timescale substructure: the cycle repeats its timing but not its form. The sharpest result is in X-rays, where all five analyzable cycles formally prefer the triple-exponential M6 profile with no statistically competitive alternative, whereas gamma-ray cycles often admit several equally good descriptions. Contemporaneous bands share a common envelope but not their secondary peaks, which argues for a long-term, possibly geometric modulation with intrinsic, energy-dependent processes layered on top. A reader should care because this reframes what the periodicity is and how to search for its mechanism—and the recurring twin-peak structures keep the supermassive-black-hole-binary interpretation in play.

What carries the argument

The central tool is a menu of thirteen empirical profile templates (five single-peaked, eight multi-peaked), fit to each oscillation and ranked by the Bayesian Information Criterion with a ΔBIC<2 comparability threshold. The workhorse is the triple-exponential rise–decay profile (M6), whose components carry independent rise and decay times; it is the most frequent winner overall and the unique choice in every X-ray cycle. Because BIC penalizes free parameters, M6's repeated victory turns 'the cycles have substructure' from visual impression into statistical claim—though the same flexibility that fits sub-flares can also bridge gaps in sparse light curves.

What would settle it

Dense-cadence X-ray monitoring over one full 2.1-yr cycle (daily or better Swift/XRT sampling): if the light curve resolves into a single smooth pulse rather than the triple-exponential three-component structure, the all-M6 X-ray result is a sampling artifact. Independently, inject simulated single-peaked flares into the actual sparse X-ray and UV sampling patterns and count how often the triple-exponential model wins the BIC ranking; if flexible templates routinely win on fabricated single pulses, the fitted morphology carries no physical information.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Fitting each ~2.1-yr cycle of blazar PG 1553+113 with thirteen empirical profile templates ranked by BIC, the authors find every cycle is a broad activity envelope with substructure that varies by cycle and band: neither sinusoidal nor self-similar. X-rays are decisive: all five cycles uniquely prefer the triple exponential profile M6, no competitor within ΔBIC<2, so X-ray emission is structured flare complexes; gamma-ray cycles often admit several equivalent profiles. Bands agree on main peaks but not on subpeaks, implying a common long-term modulation with intrinsic variability on top. New dominant-peak-plus-twin-peaks cycles keep the binary black hole scenario viable, not proven.

Load-bearing premise

That the fitted profile shapes are genuine emission structure, and not flexible multi-component functions bridging the gaps of the sparse, irregularly sampled X-ray and UV light curves.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Periodicity searches in blazars should be rebuilt around profile-aware templates: a complex, asymmetric oscillation spreads signal power from the fundamental into harmonics, so sine-based periodograms understate the significance of recurrences like this one.
  • A global cross-correlation lag of zero between bands no longer implies strictly simultaneous variability; agreement is at the envelope level, with each band's subpeaks arriving at their own times and strengths.
  • X-ray monitoring becomes the discriminating window: the consistent triple-exponential structure in all five X-ray cycles predicts that future dense X-ray campaigns will keep resolving multiple, asymmetric flare components rather than a single pulse.
  • The reappearance of dominant-peak-plus-twin-peaks morphologies in cycles observed after the original 2008–2018 study extends the empirical basis of the supermassive-black-hole-binary scenario for PG 1553+113 and argues for continued multiwavelength monitoring through future cycles.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct injection test, not run in the paper, would settle the sampling worry: simulate single-peaked flares, place them under the real sparse X-ray/UV cadences, and count how often the triple-exponential model wins on BIC; if it wins often, the all-M6 X-ray result is an artifact of function flexibility rather than source structure.
  • If the long-term envelope is genuinely geometric (line-of-sight alignment changing Doppler boosting), then the substructure's timing relative to the 2.1-yr phase should stay roughly constant while its amplitude varies; a phase-folded stack of many cycles is a testable prediction of that picture.
  • The same cycle-by-cycle profile decomposition could be applied to other periodic blazar candidates, turning 'is this periodicity real?' into 'does the period repeat a shape or just an epoch?', which separates clock-like binary modulation from recurring jet-plasma activity.
  • In the binary interpretation, the intermittency of the twin peaks becomes a feature: if binary-driven instabilities ignite sub-flares only in some orbits, the presence or absence of twin peaks in each cycle should correlate with cycle number or phase, a pattern future monitoring can look for.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes the multiwavelength variability of the blazar PG 1553+113 in the context of its reported ~2.1 yr periodicity. For gamma-ray, X-ray, UV, and optical light curves, the authors identify individual cycles, fit a set of single- and multi-component analytical profile models (S1–S5, M1–M8), and rank the fits using BIC with a ΔBIC<2 comparability threshold. They report that the oscillations are generally best described as a broad activity envelope with shorter-timescale substructure rather than as strictly sinusoidal or self-similar pulses; that the preferred morphology varies across cycles and bands, with X-rays formally preferring the triple-exponential M6 model in all five analyzed cycles; and that contemporaneous multiwavelength oscillations show broadly aligned envelopes but non-repeating internal substructure. They also identify cycles with dominant peaks accompanied by weaker twin-peak-like features, which they argue keeps a supermassive-black-hole-binary scenario viable. The analysis is entirely empirical and rests on public datasets, with extensive appendix tables and figures.

Significance. If the morphological results are robust, this is a useful contribution to the long-standing debate on periodic blazar variability: it moves beyond a periodicity claim to the shape of the oscillation, shows that the 2.1-yr signal is not a clean sinusoid, and motivates physically grounded templates for future periodicity searches. The paper is transparent about its modeling choices, applies a consistent BIC criterion, uses public data, and explicitly cautions against over-interpretation of sparse-sampling bands. Its main limitations are that the quantitative claims—especially the X-ray morphology and the tuple-level component correspondences—are not backed by uncertainty estimates or simulated-cadence tests, and the number of cycles per band is small. As a result, the significance is conditional on those gaps being closed; the qualitative, hedged statements are largely defensible.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2, Table A2, Eq. (13)] The claim that X-ray oscillations are 'systematically structured' rests on the universal preference for the 12-parameter triple-exponential M6 model, with no competitor within ΔBIC<2 in any of the five cycles. The manuscript itself concedes (last paragraph of §4.2; also §4.3 and §5.2) that exponential multi-component functions are flexible enough to reproduce structured events while remaining smooth across poorly sampled intervals. No injection-recovery test is presented, so the formal BIC margins of hundreds to thousands are not calibrated against the observed irregular cadence and gaps. For example, Cycle 2 in Table A2 gives ΔBIC ≈ 2995 for the next-best model, but it is not shown that a truly single smooth component would not be overtaken by M6 when sampled with the same sparse X-ray pattern. I request simulated-cadence and noise-level injections with underlying S1/S2/S4/M1/M4/M6 prof
  2. [§5.1, Table A5; Tables A1–A4] The quantitative support for the claimed component-by-component correspondences is not assessable because no uncertainties are reported for any morphological parameter. The text reports offsets such as X-ray +87 d in Tuple 4 (Fig. 4) and component times in Table A5 to the day (e.g., gamma 59987/60078/60169; X-ray 59996/60075/60168), yet the X-ray light curve is sparse and irregularly sampled (Fig. 1). The 'close component-by-component correspondence' and the twin-peak-like recurrences are therefore statements about point estimates only. I ask for bootstrap or MCMC/covariance uncertainties on component centroids, amplitudes, widths, rise/decay times, and structure fractions, together with the number of points in each cycle and the local sampling windows. This is needed to judge whether the reported peak offsets and amplitude ratios are consistent with zero/with each other within errors, e
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figure 4] The panel titles show 'T uple 1', 'T uple 2', etc., with an erroneous space and nonstandard formatting. Please fix to 'Tuple 1', etc.
  2. [§3.2, S5] The phrase 'he Gaussian-rise plus exponential-decay profile' should be 'The Gaussian-rise plus exponential-decay profile'.
  3. [§4.5, Figure 2] The text describes the distribution of log10(1+ΔBIC), while the figure axis label reads 'log10 (1 + BIC)' in the extracted version. Clarify whether the plotted quantity is based on ΔBIC or the raw BIC, and make label and caption consistent.
  4. [§4.6] The interband comparison of morphological parameters (Fig. 3) uses only five X-ray and five UV cycles; the medians and interquartile ranges are likely unstable. The text is appropriately cautious, but consider stating explicitly that these distributions are illustrative rather than statistically comparable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No material circularity: the profile morphology is an empirical BIC-based fit to public light curves; self-citations supply inputs (periodicity, data reduction) but the morphological derivation is not reduced to them.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is an empirical model-selection analysis. The profile models are defined in §3.2 as mathematical functions (Eqs. 1–16) and fitted to each pre-identified oscillation; the BIC rankings in Tables A1–A4 are computed from those fits. The headline result—oscillations are broad envelopes with shorter-timescale substructure rather than strictly sinusoidal—is a descriptive output of those fits, not a quantity obtained by fitting a parameter to a subset and then predicting the same subset. The X-ray all-M6 preference is a formal BIC result, and the paper itself cautions that 'the frequent preference for exponential multi-component profiles may partly reflect the fact that such functions are flexible enough to reproduce structured events while remaining smooth across poorly sampled intervals' (§4.3, echoed in §4.2 and §5.2). That is an important validity caveat—it weakens the inference that X-ray substructure is real—but it is not a circular reduction: the BIC comparison is not defined in terms of the conclusion. Reliance on prior same-team works (e.g., Peñil et al. 2026b for cycle associations and the MJD 60000 monitoring campaign; Marcotulli & Torres-Albà 2026 for the Swift pipeline) supplies inputs such as the 2.1-yr periodicity and the reduced light curves. Those inputs are not re-derived here, and the profile fitting is performed independently on them. The SMBHB and dual-variability discussions in §6 are explicitly interpretive and do not feed back into the fits. No equation in the paper reduces to a fitted quantity by construction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from self-citations. Hence no specific circular step can be exhibited; the moderate self-referentiality does not make the central claim circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis is descriptive curve fitting, so its burden lies less in invented physics than in assumed inputs: the reality of the 2.1-yr periodicity (established by the same team), the adequacy of the 13 empirical templates, the validity of BIC on sparse windows, and the reliability of the public/SAPLE light curves. The main free choices are per-component fit parameters (the outputs), per-cycle baseline offsets, the unstated cycle-window boundaries, and the DeltaBIC < 2 threshold. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Per-component model parameters (amplitude, centroid, width, rise/decay times) for templates S1-S5 and M1-M8 = Reported per cycle in Tables A1-A5
    Each of the 13 empirical templates carries 3 to 5 free parameters per component, fitted to each of the 26 identified oscillations. These are descriptive fit parameters, the paper's measurement outputs, not derived quantities.
  • Baseline level F_c per cycle and band
    Constant offset fitted for every oscillation; it enters the reported peak amplitudes relative to baseline and hence the structure fraction and symmetry.
  • Cycle window boundaries
    The time interval defining each oscillation is chosen by the authors using the presumed 2.1-yr periodicity but the selection rule is never specified; BIC rankings can depend on window placement.
  • DeltaBIC < 2 comparability threshold = 2
    Adopted following Kass and Raftery (1995); standard but a modelling choice that determines whether profiles are called competitive.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The ~2.1-yr periodicity of PG 1553+113 is real and the segments analyzed are its oscillation cycles
    Cycle identification rests on the periodicity established by prior work, largely the authors' own (Ackermann et al. 2015; Penil et al. 2020, 2024, 2026a). The paper does not re-derive the period; if it is spurious, the identified cycles are arbitrary segments.
  • domain assumption The analytical templates are adequate and distinguishable descriptions of the true variability
    Fits are empirical; the paper itself notes multi-component exponential functions may absorb unresolved variability or sampling-induced discontinuities in sparse X-ray/UV data (sections 4.2, 4.3, 5.2).
  • standard math BIC model comparison is valid on small, unevenly sampled windows
    BIC penalizes parameter count as k ln(n); with a few dozen points and up to 10 or more parameters per cycle the penalty is weak, and the authors caution that large DeltaBIC separations in X-rays must be read against uneven sampling (sections 3.4, 4.2).
  • domain assumption The public datasets and the same-team SAPLE reduction of Swift data are correct as used
    Fermi-LAT repository, CSS, ASAS-SN, ZTF data are public; the Swift/XRT and UVOT light curves are produced by the SAPLE pipeline defined in the companion same-team paper Marcotulli and Torres-Alba (2026), not described here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Profile Analysis of the Multiwavelength 2.1-year Oscillations of PG 1553+113." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LUGJ4DUO

@misc{pith2026260803947,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Profile Analysis of the Multiwavelength 2.1-year Oscillations of PG 1553+113},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LUGJ4DUO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03947}
}
abstract

We investigate the morphology of the oscillation profiles of the blazar PG~1553+113 in relation to its well-known $\sim$2.1 yr periodicity. We identify individual cycles in the $\gamma$-ray, X-ray, UV, and optical light curves and characterize their temporal profiles using analytical models for single- and multi-peaked events. We find that the oscillations are generally described by a broad activity envelope with shorter-timescale substructure, showing that the $\sim$2.1 yr signal is not a strictly sinusoidal or self-similar modulation. The internal morphology varies across cycles and energy bands. This is particularly evident in X-rays, where all analyzed cycles show a strong formal preference for multi-component profiles, unlike the $\gamma$-ray band, where several cycles admit statistically comparable empirical descriptions. The contemporaneous MWL oscillations show broadly aligned activity episodes, but the timing and relative amplitudes of secondary components are not systematically repeated. This suggests that a common long-term modulation affects the broadband emission, while additional local or energy-dependent processes shape individual cycles. Such a picture is compatible with a geometric, jet-related contribution to the broad recurrent envelope, with intrinsic variability superimposed on it. We also identify new cycles with a dominant peak accompanied by weaker twin-peak-like features, similar to structures previously discussed in a supermassive black hole binary scenario for PG~1553+113. Although our results do not provide definitive evidence for this interpretation, the recurrence of comparable morphologies in newly analyzed cycles keeps this scenario viable.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.03947 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. — Light curves used in this study. From top to the bottom: Fermi￾LAT (𝛾 rays), Swift-XRT (X-rays), UVOT (UV), and optical (V-band). pernovae; Shappee et al. 2014; Kochanek et al. 2017) 4 , and ZTF (Zwicky Transient Facility; Masci et al. 2019) 5 databases. By merging the V-band observations from these databases, we obtained an optical data set spanning the interval 2005–2026. The UV and optical profiles are fitted i… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. — Global comparison of the empirical profile models across all ana￾lyzed oscillations and wavelength bands. Top: distributions of the 𝑅 2 values and log10 (1 + ΔBIC) for each profile model, where (ΔBIC) is computed rel￾ative to the minimum BIC obtained for each individual oscillation and band. Bottom: number of cases in which each model is selected as the best-ranked profile ΔBIC=0 and number of cases in which it re… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. — Distribution of the morphological parameters derived from the best-fit oscillation profiles in the 𝛾-ray, X-ray, UV, and optical bands of Table A1, Table A2, Table A3, and Table A4, respectively. From top left to bottom: oscillation width, rise time, decay time, profile symmetry, and structure fraction. Individual points represent the fitted oscillations in each energy band. Parameters that did not converge are om… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: — Tuples of contemporaneous multiwavelength oscillations. The gray dashed vertical line marks the highest-amplitude fitted component of 𝛾-ray profile, while the red dotted vertical lines mark the corresponding highest-amplitude fitted components at the other wavelength…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Multiwavelength Evidence for Quasi-periodic Modulation in the Gamma-Ray Blazar PG 1553+113. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/813/2/L41 , archivePrefix =. 1509.02063 , primaryClass =

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    The variability patterns of the TeV blazar PG 1553 + 113 from a decade of MAGIC and multiband observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae649 , archivePrefix =. 2403.02159 , primaryClass =

  3. [3]

    Multiwavelength Variability Analysis of Fermi-LAT Blazars

    Multiwavelength variability analysis of Fermi-LAT blazars. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae594 , archivePrefix =. 2403.01520 , primaryClass =

  4. [4]

    Multiwavelength Analysis of Fermi-LAT Blazars with High-Significance Periodicity: Detection of a Long-Term Rising Emission in PG 1553+113

    Multiwavelength analysis of Fermi-LAT blazars with high-significance periodicity: detection of a long-term rising emission in PG 1553+113. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3246 , archivePrefix =. 2310.12754 , primaryClass =

  5. [5]

    Distortions in Periodicity Analysis of Blazars: The Impact of Flares

    Distortions in periodicity analysis of blazars: the impact of flares. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf482 , archivePrefix =. 2504.05092 , primaryClass =

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Distortions in periodicity analysis of blazars ─ II: the impact of gaps. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1842 , archivePrefix =. 2510.19610 , primaryClass =

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    Search for periodic variability in -ray blazars Using Fermi-LAT. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1108 , archivePrefix =. 2211.01894 , primaryClass =

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Extensive analysis of -ray periodicity in jetted AGNs from the 4FGL catalogue using Fermi-LAT observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1598 , archivePrefix =. 2509.14013 , primaryClass =

Show all 92 references
  1. [9]

    , keywords =

    Search for Kink Events in Variable Fermi-LAT Blazars. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adcbab , archivePrefix =. 2504.10308 , primaryClass =

  2. [10]

    , keywords =

    Testing X-ray Periodicity and Long-Term Trend in PG 1553+113 via Targeted Swift-XRT Monitoring. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202659801 , archivePrefix =. 2604.05905 , primaryClass =

  3. [11]

    The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =

    Transient QPOs of Fermi-LAT blazars with Linearly Multiplicative Oscillations. The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.33232/001c.154123 , archivePrefix =. 2507.13906 , primaryClass =

  4. [12]

    , keywords =

    Gamma-Ray Periodicity in Jetted AGN: Revisiting Periodicity Candidates with >17 years of Fermi-LAT Data. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stag1141 , archivePrefix =. 2606.15676 , primaryClass =

  5. [13]

    , keywords =

    The Fermi-LAT Lightcurve Repository. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acbb6a , archivePrefix =. 2301.01607 , primaryClass =

  6. [14]

    , keywords =

    Blazar Jets Perturbed by Magneto-gravitational Stresses in Supermassive Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/220 , archivePrefix =. 1701.05350 , primaryClass =

  7. [15]

    , keywords =

    The X-Ray Outburst of PG 1553+113: A Precession Effect of Two Jets in the Supermassive Black Hole Binary System. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2d98 , archivePrefix =. 2110.01769 , primaryClass =

  8. [16]

    , keywords =

    Fermi Observations of the Very Hard Gamma-ray Blazar PG 1553+113. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/708/2/1310 , archivePrefix =. 0911.4252 , primaryClass =

  9. [17]

    , keywords =

    Gamma-ray Light Curves and Variability of Bright Fermi-detected Blazars. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/520 , archivePrefix =. 1004.0348 , primaryClass =

  10. [18]

    , keywords =

    Systematic Search for -Ray Periodicity in Active Galactic Nuclei Detected by the Fermi Large Area Telescope. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab910d , archivePrefix =. 2002.00805 , primaryClass =

  11. [19]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Singular Spectrum Analysis of Fermi-LAT Blazar Light Curves: A Systematic Search for Periodicity and Trends in the Time Domain. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  12. [20]

    , keywords =

    Constraining the PG 1553+113 Binary Hypothesis: Interpreting Hints of a New, 22 yr Period. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad310a , archivePrefix =. 2307.11696 , primaryClass =

  13. [21]

    , keywords =

    Decade-long periodicity study of 2FHL blazars with historical optical data. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf783 , archivePrefix =. 2409.18334 , primaryClass =

  14. [22]

    , keywords =

    Unveiling the periodic variability patterns of the X-ray emission from the blazar PG 1553+113. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449515 , archivePrefix =. 2404.07089 , primaryClass =

  15. [23]

    , keywords =

    The Physical Origins of the Identified and Still Missing Components of the Warm-Hot Intergalactic Medium: Insights from Deep Surveys in the Field of Blazar 1ES1553+113. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab479a , archivePrefix =. 1909.11667 , primaryClass =

  16. [24]

    , keywords =

    Improving blazar redshift constraints with the edge of the Ly forest: 1ES 1553+113 and implications for observations of the WHIM. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3331 , archivePrefix =. 2111.06927 , primaryClass =

  17. [25]

    , keywords =

    Jet Precession Driven by a Supermassive Black Hole Binary System in the BL Lac Object PG 1553+113. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa9fea , archivePrefix =. 1712.06881 , primaryClass =

  18. [26]

    , keywords =

    The Blazar PG 1553+113 as a Binary System of Supermassive Black Holes. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa3f4 , archivePrefix =. 1801.03335 , primaryClass =

  19. [27]

    , keywords =

    A model for periodic blazars. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2684 , archivePrefix =. 1610.04709 , primaryClass =

  20. [28]

    , keywords =

    A Geometric Model to Interpret the -Ray Quasiperiodic Oscillation of PG 1553+113. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbe3e , adsurl =

  21. [29]

    A geometric originof intraday variability

    The lighthouse effect of relativistic jets in blazars. A geometric originof intraday variability. , keywords =

  22. [30]

    , keywords =

    Lense-Thirring precession around supermassive black holes during tidal disruption events. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2417 , archivePrefix =. 1510.04879 , primaryClass =

  23. [31]

    , keywords =

    Tidal disruption event discs around supermassive black holes: disc warp and inclination evolution. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1610 , archivePrefix =. 1902.09546 , primaryClass =

  24. [32]

    Helical jets in blazars. I. The case of MKN 501. , keywords =

  25. [33]

    , keywords =

    Multiband light curves from eccentric accreting supermassive black hole binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103010 , archivePrefix =. 2111.06882 , primaryClass =

  26. [34]

    , keywords =

    Binary Black Hole Accretion from a Circumbinary Disk: Gas Dynamics inside the Central Cavity. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/134 , archivePrefix =. 1310.0492 , primaryClass =

  27. [35]

    , keywords =

    Quasi-periodic oscillations in the -ray light curves of bright active galactic nuclei. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244754 , archivePrefix =. 2204.13051 , primaryClass =

  28. [36]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Covino, S and Sandrinelli, A and Treves, A , title = ". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2720 , url =

  29. [37]

    , keywords =

    A reduced orbital period for the supermassive black hole binary candidate in the quasar PG 1302-102?. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1457 , archivePrefix =. 1502.03112 , primaryClass =

  30. [38]

    , keywords =

    Periodic Gamma-Ray Modulation of the Blazar PG 1553+113 Confirmed by Fermi-LAT and Multiwavelength Observations. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad64c5 , archivePrefix =. 2501.08015 , primaryClass =

  31. [39]

    and Peitz, J

    Gracia, J. and Peitz, J. and Keller, Ch. and Camenzind, M. , title = ". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2003 , month =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06832.x , url =

  32. [40]

    , keywords =

    Wavelets for period analysis of unevenly sampled time series. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/118137 , adsurl =

  33. [41]

    The Universe of Digital Sky Surveys , year = 2016, editor =

    Singular Spectrum Analysis for Astronomical Time Series: Constructing a Parsimonious Hypothesis Test. The Universe of Digital Sky Surveys , year = 2016, editor =. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19330-4_16 , archivePrefix =. 1509.03342 , primaryClass =

  34. [42]

    Singular Spectrum Analysis for Time Series , year =

    Nina Golyandina, Anatoly Zhigljavsky , publisher =. Singular Spectrum Analysis for Time Series , year =

  35. [44]

    [arXiv:1305.0304] Light Curve Simulation Algorithm

    A Python Code for the Emmanoulopoulos et al. [arXiv:1305.0304] Light Curve Simulation Algorithm. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  36. [45]

    A new formalism for the floating-mean and Keplerian periodograms

    The generalised Lomb-Scargle periodogram. A new formalism for the floating-mean and Keplerian periodograms. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200811296 , archivePrefix =. 0901.2573 , primaryClass =

  37. [46]

    , keywords =

    Least-Squares Frequency Analysis of Unequally Spaced Data. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/BF00648343 , adsurl =

  38. [47]

    Studies in astronomical time series analysis. II. Statistical aspects of spectral analysis of unevenly spaced data. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/160554 , adsurl =

  39. [48]

    , keywords =

    Period determination using phase dispersion minimization. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/156444 , adsurl =

  40. [49]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Improved AGN light curve analysis with the z-transformed discrete correlation function. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1302.1508 , archivePrefix =. 1302.1508 , primaryClass =

  41. [50]

    , keywords =

    Systematic Search for Long-term Trends in Fermi-LAT Jetted Active Galactic Nuclei. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada4b3 , archivePrefix =. 2501.01310 , primaryClass =

  42. [51]

    and Ringle, C.M

    Hair, J.F. and Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. , title =. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice , volume =. 2011 , publisher =. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202 , URL =

  43. [52]

    , keywords =

    Photometric calibration of the Swift ultraviolet/optical telescope. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12563.x , archivePrefix =. 0708.2259 , primaryClass =

  44. [53]

    2008 Nanjing Gamma-ray Burst Conference , year = 2008, editor =

    UV/Optical Properties of GRBs with the Swift UVOT. 2008 Nanjing Gamma-ray Burst Conference , year = 2008, editor =. doi:10.1063/1.3027964 , adsurl =

  45. [54]

    Gamma Ray Bursts 2010 , year = 2011, editor =

    An Updated Ultraviolet Calibration for the Swift/UVOT. Gamma Ray Bursts 2010 , year = 2011, editor =. doi:10.1063/1.3621807 , archivePrefix =. 1102.4717 , primaryClass =

  46. [55]

    , keywords =

    Radio to gamma-ray variability study of blazar S5 0716+714. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321058 , archivePrefix =. 1301.7087 , primaryClass =

  47. [56]

    Studies in astronomical time series analysis. VI. Bayesian block representations , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  48. [57]

    , volume=

    Systematic Physical Characterization of the -Ray Spectra of 2FHL Blazars , author=. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  49. [58]

    , volume=

    Correlation between optical and -ray flux variations in BL Lacs , author=. , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  50. [59]

    , keywords =

    First Results from the Catalina Real-Time Transient Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/870 , archivePrefix =. 0809.1394 , primaryClass =

  51. [60]

    , keywords =

    The Man behind the Curtain: X-Rays Drive the UV through NIR Variability in the 2013 Active Galactic Nucleus Outburst in NGC 2617. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/48 , archivePrefix =. 1310.2241 , primaryClass =

  52. [61]

    , keywords =

    The All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae (ASAS-SN) Light Curve Server v1.0. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aa80d9 , archivePrefix =. 1706.07060 , primaryClass =

  53. [62]

    , keywords =

    The Zwicky Transient Facility: Data Processing, Products, and Archive. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac , archivePrefix =. 1902.01872 , primaryClass =

  54. [63]

    , keywords =

    On the Reliability of Cross-Correlation Function Lag Determinations in Active Galactic Nuclei. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/316457 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9911112 , primaryClass =

  55. [64]

    , keywords =

    On the Bardeen-Petterson effect in black hole accretion discs. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv014 , archivePrefix =. 1501.01687 , primaryClass =

  56. [65]

    , keywords =

    Multiband variability of the TeV blazar PG 1553+113 with XMM-Newton. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1743 , archivePrefix =. 2106.08514 , primaryClass =

  57. [66]

    An analysis of its flux and polarization variability

    Synchrotron emission from the blazar PG 1553+113. An analysis of its flux and polarization variability. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3333 , archivePrefix =. 1612.07000 , primaryClass =

  58. [67]

    Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , year = 1998, month = jan, volume = 79, pages =

    A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , year = 1998, month = jan, volume = 79, pages =. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0061:APGTWA>2.0.CO;2 , adsurl =

  59. [68]

    , keywords =

    Coexistence of chromatic flares and an achromatic quasi-periodic oscillation in the gamma-ray blazar PG 1553+113. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202659239 , archivePrefix =. 2603.04527 , primaryClass =

  60. [69]

    , keywords =

    Time correlation between the radio and gamma-ray activity in blazars and the production site of the gamma-ray emission. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1749 , archivePrefix =. 1408.6264 , primaryClass =

  61. [70]

    , keywords =

    On the Geometrical Origin of Periodicity in Blazar-type Sources. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/426018 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0410188 , primaryClass =

  62. [71]

    , keywords =

    Probing the jets of blazars using the temporal symmetry of their multiwavelength outbursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2748 , archivePrefix =. 1810.06585 , primaryClass =

  63. [72]

    , TITLE=

    Finke, Justin D. , TITLE=. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , VOLUME=. 2024 , URL=. doi:10.3389/fspas.2024.1384234 , ISSN=

  64. [73]

    , keywords =

    Statistical analysis of variability properties of the Kepler blazar W2R 1926+42. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1082 , archivePrefix =. 1804.10245 , primaryClass =

  65. [74]

    , volume =

    Sarkar, Arkadipta and Gupta, Alok C and Chitnis, Varsha R and Wiita, Paul J , title =. , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3211 , url =

  66. [75]

    , volume =

    Nalewajko, Krzysztof , title =. , volume =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts711 , url =

  67. [76]

    , volume =

    Bhatta, Gopal and Zola, Staszek and Drozdz, M and Reichart, Daniel and Haislip, Joshua and Kouprianov, Vladimir and Matsumoto, Katsura and Sonbas, Eda and Caton, D and Pajdosz-Śmierciak, Urszula and Simon, A and Provencal, J and Góra, Dariusz and Stachowski, Grzegorz , title =...

  68. [77]

    and Pavlidou, V

    Blinov, D. and Pavlidou, V. and Papadakis, I. and Kiehlmann, S. and Liodakis, I. and Panopoulou, G. V. and Angelakis, E. and Baloković, M. and Hovatta, T. and King, O. G. and Kus, A. and Kylafis, N. and Mahabal, A. and Maharana, S. and Myserlis, I. and Paleologou, E. and Papam...

  69. [78]

    , keywords =

    Expanding Relativistic Shells and Gamma-Ray Burst Temporal Structure. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/178210 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9607163 , primaryClass =

  70. [79]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Yan, Zhen and Xie, Fu-Guo , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3259 , url =

  71. [80]

    Total Flux Density Variations in Extragalactic Radio Sources. I. Decomposition of Variations into Exponential Flares. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/313170 , adsurl =

  72. [81]

    , keywords =

    Multiwavelength variability of the blazar AO 0235+164. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2491 , archivePrefix =. 2411.01497 , primaryClass =

  73. [82]

    , keywords =

    Doppler factors, Lorentz factors and viewing angles for quasars, BL Lacertae objects and radio galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200811150 , archivePrefix =. 0811.4278 , primaryClass =

  74. [83]

    , keywords =

    AGN flares as counterparts to LIGO/Virgo mergers: no confident causal connection in spatial correlation analysis. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2787 , archivePrefix =. 2405.05318 , primaryClass =

  75. [84]

    , keywords =

    Candidate Electromagnetic Counterpart to the Binary Black Hole Merger Gravitational-Wave Event S190521g ^ *. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.251102 , archivePrefix =. 2006.14122 , primaryClass =

  76. [85]

    Annals of Statistics , year = 1978, month = jul, volume =

    Estimating the Dimension of a Model. Annals of Statistics , year = 1978, month = jul, volume =

  77. [86]

    , keywords =

    X-ray variability patterns in blazars. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015871 , archivePrefix =. 1010.4511 , primaryClass =

  78. [87]

    , keywords =

    Rapid variability in the synchrotron self-Compton model for blazars. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02538.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9810263 , primaryClass =

  79. [88]

    , keywords =

    Very Rapid High-amplitude Gamma-Ray Variability in Luminous Blazar PKS 1510-089 Studied with Fermi-LAT. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/766/1/L11 , archivePrefix =. 1302.0335 , primaryClass =

  80. [89]

    , keywords =

    Turbulent, Extreme Multi-zone Model for Simulating Flux and Polarization Variability in Blazars. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/87 , archivePrefix =. 1311.7665 , primaryClass =

  81. [90]

    , keywords =

    Models for high-frequency radio outbursts in extragalactic sources, with application to the early 1983 millimeter-to-infrared flare of 3C 273. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/163592 , adsurl =

  82. [91]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    SAPLE: Swift Analysis Pipeline for Lightcurve Extraction. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2605.10423 , archivePrefix =. 2605.10423 , primaryClass =

  83. [92]

    Burnham and David R

    Kenneth P. Burnham and David R. Anderson , title =. Sociological Methods & Research , volume =. 2004 , doi =

  84. [93]

    and Raftery, Adrian E

    Kass, Robert E. and Raftery, Adrian E. , title =. Journal of the American Statistical Association , year =

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.