When Privileged Guidance Misaligns: State-Matched Routing and Contextualized Self-Distillation for Multi-Turn Agents

Jun Ling; Junzhuo Liu; Peng Wang; Weiwei Li

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 38 references

When Privileged Guidance Misaligns: State-Matched Routing and Contextualized Self-Distillation for Multi-Turn Agents

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Privileged reference guidance is trustworthy only at states the reference actually covers; SMRC-SD routes self-distillation to matched states and grounds teacher context there, improving ALFWorld Average@4 from 0.746 to 0.865 and WebShop…

desk verdict A genuinely new routing mechanism for privileged self-distillation with strong ALFWorld evidence, but the WebShop half of the claim rests on unverified reference traces. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05219 v1 pith:2JNV4G54 submitted 2026-08-05 cs.AI

Junzhuo Liu , Weiwei Li , Jun Ling , Peng Wang This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.AI

keywords state-matchedroutingself-distillationmulti-turnagentsprivilegedguidancestate-referencemismatchALFWorldWebShopon-policylearning

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Privileged on-policy distillation gives a multi-turn agent dense training signal by letting a synchronized teacher re-score the student's own responses while conditioning on a successful reference trajectory. The problem is that the student's actions can carry it to execution states the reference never visits, so the same reference that is task-correct can still be locally misleading at exactly the turns where it is used. The paper proposes State-Matched Routing and Contextualized Self-Distillation (SMRC-SD), which first verifies whether the reached state is compatible with a supported pre-action state on the reference and only then applies distillation, constructing teacher context from the full path, a summary of the reached state, and the grounded candidate action. Across ALFWorld and WebShop with two model families, the method consistently outperforms unconditional full-path distillation; on Qwen3-1.7B it raises ALFWorld Average@4 from 0.746 to 0.865 and WebShop accuracy from 0.574 to 0.693. The paper's controlled ablations indicate that both matched-only routing and state-contextualized teacher guidance contribute, and that the routing benefit comes from matched-turn identity rather than merely from distilling on fewer turns.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the structured-state matcher: compact environment-specific state signatures $\sigma_t$ for the on-policy reached state and $\bar{\sigma}_{g,k}$ for the reference pre-action states, reconstructed from task metadata and the action prefix, paired with the directional support relation $\sigma_t \models_g \bar{\sigma}_{g,k}$ and an action-grounding function $\Gamma_g$ that checks whether the reference action can be performed from the current admissible set. The matcher selects the latest compatible position $k_t = \max\{k : C_t(k) = 1\}$, sets the route mask $w_t$ to one only if such a position exists, and outputs the grounded candidate $\tilde{a}_{t,k_t}$. This compatibility test determines both whether the privileged loss is applied and which continuation localizes the teacher context, so all downstream gains reported in the paper are attributed to the quality of this certification.

What would settle it

Reuse the published adapters on a new interactive benchmark with different state semantics and compare SMRC-SD against FullPath-SD; if the matched candidate-plus-suffix replay success rate drops materially below the 100% reported on ALFWorld or the policy gain disappears, the support relation is not transferring. Likewise, score the 6,910 WebShop oracle traces with the environment's own WebShop scorer: if a substantial share of the traces used as references score below 1.0, one can test whether restricting references to scorer-verified successes changes the gains.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that an executable successful trajectory is a state-indexed resource, not a context to be applied unconditionally: each transition $\bar{a}_{g,k}$ is certified only at its demonstrated pre-action state $\bar{s}_{g,k}$, so when the on-policy rollout reaches a state $\sigma_t$ that the reference does not support, conditioned self-distillation can actively lower the score of a valid action. SMRC-SD treats the reference as a conditional plan: a hand-engineered adapter reconstructs compact execution signatures, a directional support relation $\sigma_t \models_g \bar{\sigma}_{g,k}$ together with an admissible-action grounding check decides whether a match exists, and distillation is routed to matched turns only. On matched turns the teacher context is rendered from the full successful path, a one-line summary of the reached state, and the grounded candidate continuation. The reported result is that this jointly matched-and-routed procedure beats unconditional full-path distillation on both benchmarks and both model families, with the largest Qwen3-1.7B gain from 0.746 to 0.865 Average@4 on ALFWorld and 0.574 to 0.693 accuracy on WebShop. The ablations further show that random same-count turn selection does not reproduce the routing gain and that neither the state summary nor the candidate alone improves matched-turn guidance; the complete bundle is needed.

Load-bearing premise

The method's transfer rests on the hand-engineered environment adapters and the directional support relation certifying state compatibility correctly: if the signatures misclassify a reached state, both the route mask and the grounded candidate used in training are wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Unconditional full-path self-distillation should be replaced by state-matched routing in interactive environments, since applying the reference at unmatched states can actively reduce the probability of valid actions.
State-matched routing selects turns by execution-state identity; a random same-count control shows the gain is not from distilling on fewer turns.
The structured-state matcher retains 98.8% of history-based matches while adding coverage, and matched candidate-plus-suffix replay succeeds on all sampled structured-state matches.
The trained policy needs none of the privileged machinery at deployment: references, signatures, matcher, and teacher context are all removed.
Because routing abstains on unmatched turns, those turns still receive GRPO training, so the method changes how much privileged supervision enters the update without dropping the turn from on-policy learning.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural extension is to replace the hard binary route with a confidence-weighted or learned compatibility score, which could capture partial matches the current hand-engineered relation rejects.
Because the adapters must be re-authored for each environment, the method's practical scope is the set of environments where such directional support relations can be specified; the paper demonstrates this for two benchmarks only.
The WebShop oracle traces are not required to score 1.0 under the environment's own scorer, so an untested variant is to require scorer-verified success as an additional routing condition and measure whether that changes policy quality.
The abstention design effectively turns the reference into a curriculum: the agent first learns on states it can certify, and one could test annealing the matching strictness during training to gradually admit harder states.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's my take on arXiv:2608.05219. The core idea is real: prior selection methods for privileged distillation regulate the teacher signal by confidence, outcome, or rollout structure, but nobody checks whether the reference trajectory actually contains a state compatible with the student's reached state. SMRC-SD does that with hand-engineered signatures, and the fixed-state interventions (Table 1) give clean evidence that FullPath-SD helps matched turns and hurts unmatched ones. The ablations in Tables 3-5 support both routing and contextualization as separate contributors. The replay audit on ALFWorld is the strongest piece: 781/781 structured-state matches re-execute the candidate plus the remaining suffix to success, and the same-count random-turn control rules out sparsity as the explanation. The paper is also unusually honest about its interpretive limits (Section J).

Now the soft spots. The WebShop references are 'oracle traces' deterministically constructed from the target ASIN and options, not verified as successful under the benchmark's own reward. The paper explicitly says the bundled scorer can give less than 1.0 even for a perfect trace. That undermines the certified-transition premise of Eqs. 5-6 on WebShop. There's no executable-continuation replay on WebShop—only an offline matcher audit—so the mechanism that works so cleanly on ALFWorld is not demonstrated on the second benchmark. This doesn't break the paper, but it does mean the headline 'consistently outperforms' is only fully supported on ALFWorld.

The other issues are more minor. The main results have no confidence intervals, the 128-task evaluation isn't justified against standard splits, and everything is a single seed. These are addressable. The hand-engineered matching rules are environment-specific and could be a fragility, but the paper is upfront about that and provides a common interface.

Net: this is a solid, novel contribution with careful evidence on ALFWorld and a genuine gap on WebShop. It deserves peer review, and I would expect the reviewers to ask for CIs, a WebShop replay audit, and a bit more justification of the eval split. I'd cite the state-matching idea. Not a desk reject.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies state-reference mismatch in privileged on-policy self-distillation for multi-turn agents. It proposes SMRC-SD, which at each turn reconstructs compact state signatures from the student's execution and from a same-task successful reference, routes reference-conditioned self-distillation only to turns where the reached state matches a reference pre-action state and the reference action grounds in the current admissible set, and constructs the teacher context from the full successful path, a current-state summary, and the grounded candidate. The paper reports consistent gains over the unconditional FullPath-SD baseline on ALFWorld and WebShop for two model families, and supports the mechanism with fixed-state teacher interventions, routing and context ablations, matcher comparisons, and an executable-continuation replay on ALFWorld.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper makes a useful contribution by identifying a concrete failure mode of unconditional reference-conditioned distillation and by proposing a principled way to decide when a successful trajectory is locally valid for the state actually reached on policy. The fixed-state intervention design in Table 1 is a strong complement to end-to-end policy results, and the ALFWorld executable-continuation replay (781/781 structured-state matches) is convincing evidence that the matcher's matches correspond to executable continuations on that benchmark. The paper is honest about the training-only nature of the privileged components and releases code. The main concerns are the absence of uncertainty quantification for the headline policy comparisons and the lack of equivalent reference certification on WebShop.

major comments (3)

[Main Results, Table 2; Eqs. (4), (15)] The central claim that SMRC-SD consistently outperforms FullPath-SD is supported only by single-run point estimates. No confidence intervals, standard errors, or task-level bootstrap results are reported for Table 2 or for the ablations in Tables 3-5. With 128 tasks and four rollouts per task, a task-level bootstrap is straightforward and the paper already uses a game-cluster bootstrap for Table 1. Without this uncertainty quantification, the size and reliability of the gains cannot be assessed; for example, the Qwen2.5 WebShop Acc difference of 0.734 versus 0.736 is essentially a tie in point estimate, and the Qwen3 ALFWorld improvement of 0.746 to 0.865 needs a confidence interval to support the claim of consistent improvement. Please report per-task bootstrap intervals and, ideally, at least two independent seeds for the main configurations.
[Supplementary C; Eqs. (5)-(6); Table 11] The conditional-transition premise in Eqs. (5)-(6) is that each reference transition is demonstrated from a pre-action state on a successful path. Section C concedes that the WebShop oracle traces are deterministically constructed and that the bundled WebShop scorer can assign less than 1.0 even when a trace reaches the exact goal product and options. The references are therefore not certified as successful under the environment's own reward, and on WebShop the matched/unmatched route is computed against plausible paths rather than demonstrated successful continuations. The offline audit in Table 11 verifies only that candidates are admissible and that sampled actions belong to the rendered compatible set; it never executes the candidate plus the remaining suffix and measures terminal reward, unlike the ALFWorld replay audit in Table 17. Please add a WebShop executable-continuation replay (student prefix plus candidate plus suffix, scored by the benchmark reward) or verify the constructed traces under the scorer; until then, the state-matched routing premise is validated on ALFWorld only.
[Experimental Setup; Supplementary C] The paper says it uses the official test splits and evaluates 128 tasks, but for WebShop the described protocol is a fixed 128-task subset of the first 500 held-out goals, not the full WebShop test set. The choice of 128 is not justified, and the phrase 'official test splits' is at least imprecise for WebShop. Since Table 2 is the headline evidence for the WebShop claim, please either evaluate the full 500-task held-out split, or justify the 128-task subset by citing prior work or by demonstrating that the subset is representative, and report per-task bootstrap intervals over it.

minor comments (3)

[Supplementary B, Table 8] The raw candidate-minus-sampled action margins are negative for every teacher context, which may confuse readers. The paper correctly emphasizes the paired change relative to the no-privilege row, but a one-sentence clarification that the raw margins embed the fixed reasoning produced for the sampled action would prevent misinterpretation.
[Supplementary D, Table 11] The WebShop audit reports 100.0% matching on search-home turns. Because a search action is almost always available at that page type, it would be more informative to also report the distribution of matched candidate types (query, option click, buy) for the other page types, so that the reader can see what the matcher actually certifies.
[Main Results, Figure 3] Figure 3 reports training dynamics from a single Qwen3 ALFWorld run. If the checkpoint and seed are the same as in Table 2, please state this explicitly in the caption; otherwise the dynamics plot should be labeled as a representative run rather than the main result.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reported gains are end-to-end policy measurements, and the state-matching/routing design is tested by independent ablations rather than being fit to the reported outcomes.

full rationale

The paper's central claims (Table 2) are task-success and graded-score measurements of trained policies on ALFWorld and WebShop. Nothing in Eqs. 1-15 fits a parameter to these outcomes: the route mask w_t (Eq. 13) and context c_t (Eq. 14) are constructed by the hand-engineered environment adapters (Eqs. 9-11) and then held fixed while the policy is trained under a combined GRPO+SDL objective (Eq. 15). The matched/unmatched distinction is an experimental intervention rather than an output. Table 3 varies routing and context while keeping the matcher fixed; Table 4 compares matched selection against random same-count turn selection; Table 5 ablates the context components. The fixed-state teacher interventions (Table 1 and Supplementary B) use pre-registered anchor strata and frozen scorers, and are not used to fit the final policy numbers. No load-bearing self-citation chain appears: the cited methods (GRPO, Skill-SD, SDAR, etc.) are external baselines or standard algorithms, and the adapters are documented locally rather than imported from prior work. The main weakness is WebShop reference certification: Supplementary Section C calls the WebShop records 'oracle traces' and admits 'the bundled WebShop scorer can assign less than 1.0 even when a trace reaches the exact goal product and options,' so those references are not verified as successful under the benchmark's own reward. This is a correctness and external-validity risk for one of the two benchmarks, not a circularity: the reported WebShop gains are still measured end-to-end against the benchmark scorer, and the paper does not define those gains in terms of the oracle-trace construction. Similarly, the lack of an executable candidate-plus-suffix replay on WebShop (Table 11 explicitly states 'This is an offline matcher audit, not a policy evaluation or an executable candidate-plus-suffix replay') weakens support for the routing premise on WebShop but does not make any derivation equivalent to its inputs. The paper's own interpretive limits (Supplementary J) correctly describe matched/unmatched as operational matcher labels rather than action-correctness labels, further showing that the design is not masquerading as a fitted prediction. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to circularity concerns; the residual issues are evidential and external-validity concerns, not conceptual circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method introduces no new physical entity. Its empirical claims rest on hand-designed state signatures and matching rules (Eqs. 9-13), which are the main ad hoc elements, and on standard GRPO/K3 optimization. The WebShop reference construction is an additional domain assumption that may diverge from the successful reference framing.

free parameters (6)

lambda_SDL (self-distillation coefficient) = 0.01
Weight of the SDL term in Eq. 15; chosen by hand and shared across distillation methods, so it does not differentially favor SMRC-SD.
Actor learning rate = 1e-6
Constant LR for all runs; standard choice, not tuned per method.
On-policy batch = 16 tasks/update, 8 rollouts/task
Batch construction for GRPO; held fixed across methods.
Turn horizon = 50 (Qwen2.5 ALFWorld), 30 (Qwen3 ALFWorld), 15 (WebShop)
Episode length caps; computational choices, not fitted.
Checkpoint step = 150 or 250 depending on config
Fixed checkpoints explicitly not selected by validation; reasonable but arbitrary.
Prompt/response token caps = 2048/512 (Qwen3 ALFWorld), 4096/512 or 1024 (others)
Hardware constraints; shared across methods.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption A successful reference trajectory certifies each action only at its demonstrated pre-action state (Eqs. 5-6).
The paper defines references as state-conditional transitions; the entire state-reference mismatch problem presupposes this local validity.
domain assumption Execution state can be reconstructed from action prefixes, observations, and admissible actions without hidden simulator state (Eq. 9, adapter rules).
The adapters are hand-engineered; if reconstruction misses state changes, the matcher routes incorrectly.
ad hoc to paper The directional support relation |=_g is correctly specified by hand for each environment (Eq. 11, supplementary D).
Field checks and admissible grounding are designed by the authors; no learning, theoretical guarantee, or cross-environment validation is provided.
ad hoc to paper The constructed WebShop oracle traces are valid privileged references even though the environment scorer may not assign reward 1.0 at the exact goal.
Section C: the paper calls these records oracle traces because the bundled WebShop scorer can assign less than 1.0; this weakens the successful trajectory premise.
domain assumption GRPO and the inherited chosen-token K3 estimator are appropriate optimization objectives for this setting.
Standard in the cited OPD literature; the paper does not derive or justify them beyond citation.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of When Privileged Guidance Misaligns: State-Matched Routing and Contextualized Self-Distillation for Multi-Turn Agents." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2JNV4G54

@misc{pith2026260805219,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: When Privileged Guidance Misaligns: State-Matched Routing and Contextualized Self-Distillation for Multi-Turn Agents},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2JNV4G54}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05219}
}

abstract

Privileged on-policy distillation provides dense supervision for multi-turn agents by allowing a synchronized teacher to re-score the student's response at every turn with access to training-only references, such as successful trajectories. In interactive environments, however, the student's preceding actions continually change the execution state. As the student takes different actions or completes subgoals in a different order, its rollout may reach states not covered by the reference, making the reference an unreliable source of guidance for the state actually reached. Applying privileged distillation indiscriminately therefore creates state--reference mismatch. This mismatch motivates a central objective: providing privileged reference guidance that remains compatible with the student's current execution state. We introduce State-Matched Routing and Contextualized Self-Distillation (SMRC-SD), which explicitly determines when and how a privileged trajectory should guide an on-policy student. At each turn, SMRC-SD verifies whether the student's current execution state matches a supported state along the reference trajectory. Distillation is applied only at matched states, filtering out turns for which the reference lacks locally compatible guidance. For each matched state, SMRC-SD further constructs state-conditioned teacher context from the successful trajectory, grounding supervision in the state actually reached. Across ALFWorld and WebShop, SMRC-SD consistently outperforms unconditional successful full-path distillation. With Qwen3-1.7B, it improves task success from $0.746$ to $0.865$ on ALFWorld and from $0.574$ to $0.693$ on WebShop. Controlled routing and context ablations support both selecting locally supported turns and constructing state-compatible teacher context as contributors to these gains. Code is available at https://github.com/liujunzhuo/SMRC-SD.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05219 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** SMRC-SD overview. A. State-matched routing compares the current state signature with pre-action states reconstructed from the same-task successful reference, jointly checking task identity, execution progress, and candidate admissibility. B. Contextualized self-distillation forms teacher context from the full successful path, current-state summary, and grounded candidate; the student and detached synchronized teach… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** ALFWorld Qwen3-1.7B training dynamics. Left: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: ALFWorld Average@4 with the SMRC teacher [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

[1]

2015 , eprint =

Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network , author =. 2015 , eprint =

2015
[2]

Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , year =

Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillation , author =. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , year =. doi:10.18653/v1/D16-1139 , url =

doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1139 2016
[3]

Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning , year =

Born Again Neural Networks , author =. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning , year =

work page
[4]

International Conference on Learning Representations , year =

On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakes , author =. International Conference on Learning Representations , year =
[5]

2024 , url =

Gu, Yuxian and Dong, Li and Wei, Furu and Huang, Minlie , booktitle =. 2024 , url =

work page 2024
[6]

2026 , eprint =

Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillation , author =. 2026 , eprint =

2026
[7]

2026 , eprint =

Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Models , author =. 2026 , eprint =

2026
[8]

2604.10674 , archivePrefix =

Wang, Hao and Wang, Guozhi and Xiao, Han and Zhou, Yufeng and Pan, Yue and Wang, Jichao and Xu, Ke and Wen, Yafei and Ruan, Xiaohu and Chen, Xiaoxin and Qi, Honggang , year =. 2604.10674 , archivePrefix =

arXiv

Show all 38 references

[9]

2026 , eprint =

Self-Distilled Agentic Reinforcement Learning , author =. 2026 , eprint =

2026
[10]

2026 , pages =

Tang, Guokai and Zhao, Feng , booktitle =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.1349 , url =

2026 doi
[11]

2606.30626 , archivePrefix =

Yu, Xinlei and Li, Gen and Si, Qingyi and Zhang, Guibin and Xu, Yuqi and Wang, Congcong and Dong, Shuai and Tuo, Kaiwen and Zeng, Xiangyu and Feng, Kaituo and Wang, Qunzhong and Shi, Yang and Hu, Xiaobin and Yue, Xiangyu and Wang, Jiaqi and Yan, Shuicheng , year =. 2606.30626 ...

arXiv
[12]

2604.24005 , archivePrefix =

Wang, Jiaqi and Zhang, Wenhao and Shi, Weijie and Li, Yaliang and Cheng, James , year =. 2604.24005 , archivePrefix =

arXiv
[13]

2026 , eprint =

Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation with Prefix Replay , author =. 2026 , eprint =

2026
[14]

2606.19659 , archivePrefix =

Zhou, Yuhang and Zhang, Lizhu and Wu, Yifan and Wang, Mingyi and Peng, Bo and Liu, Jiayi and Fan, Xiangjun and Zhao, Zhuokai , year =. 2606.19659 , archivePrefix =

arXiv
[15]

2026 , eprint =

What and When to Distill: Selective Hindsight Distillation for Multi-Turn Agents , author =. 2026 , eprint =

2026
[16]

2605.27140 , archivePrefix =

Zhang, Yanfei and Lin, Xu and Wu, Chenglin , year =. 2605.27140 , archivePrefix =

arXiv
[17]

2605.17873 , archivePrefix =

Yeo, Woongyeng and Choi, Yumin and Ki, Taekyung and Hwang, Sung Ju , year =. 2605.17873 , archivePrefix =

arXiv
[18]

2607.05804 , archivePrefix =

Zhou, Yuhang and Zheng, Kai and Li, Haoling and Peng, Dengyun and Xu, Can and Chen, Jingjing , year =. 2607.05804 , archivePrefix =

arXiv
[19]

Shao, Zhihong and Wang, Peiyi and Zhu, Qihao and Xu, Runxin and Song, Junxiao and Bi, Xiao and Zhang, Haowei and Zhang, Mingchuan and Li, Y. K. and Wu, Y. and Guo, Daya , year =. 2402.03300 , archivePrefix =

arXiv
[20]

International Conference on Learning Representations , year =

Shridhar, Mohit and Yuan, Xingdi and C. International Conference on Learning Representations , year =
[21]

2020 , pages =

Shridhar, Mohit and Thomason, Jesse and Gordon, Daniel and Bisk, Yonatan and Han, Winson and Mottaghi, Roozbeh and Zettlemoyer, Luke and Fox, Dieter , booktitle =. 2020 , pages =

2020
[22]

2022 , volume =

Yao, Shunyu and Chen, Howard and Yang, John and Narasimhan, Karthik , booktitle =. 2022 , volume =. doi:10.52202/068431-1508 , url =

2022 doi
[23]

2023 , url =

Yao, Shunyu and Zhao, Jeffrey and Yu, Dian and Du, Nan and Shafran, Izhak and Narasimhan, Karthik and Cao, Yuan , booktitle =. 2023 , url =

2023
[24]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year =

Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning , author =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year =. doi:10.52202/075280-0377 , url =

doi
[25]

2025 , pages =

Kim, Jeonghye and Rhee, Sojeong and Kim, Minbeom and Kim, Dohyung and Lee, Sangmook and Sung, Youngchul and Jung, Kyomin , booktitle =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1697 , url =

2025 doi
[26]

From History to State: Constant-Context Skill Learning for

Xie, Haoyang and Wang, Xinyuan and Wang, Yancheng and Zhao, Puda and Ju, Feng , year =. From History to State: Constant-Context Skill Learning for. 2605.05413 , archivePrefix =

arXiv
[27]

2505.09388 , archivePrefix =

Yang, An and others , year =. 2505.09388 , archivePrefix =

arXiv
[28]

2412.15115 , archivePrefix =

Yang, An and others , year =. 2412.15115 , archivePrefix =

arXiv
[29]

Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning , year =

Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning, Acting, and Planning in Language Models , author =. Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning , year =
[30]

2024 , pages =

Zhao, Andrew and Huang, Daniel and Xu, Quentin and Lin, Matthieu and Liu, Yong-Jin and Huang, Gao , booktitle =. 2024 , pages =

2024
[31]

Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning , year =

Agent Workflow Memory , author =. Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning , year =
[32]

International Conference on Learning Representations , year =

Synapse: Trajectory-as-Exemplar Prompting with Memory for Computer Control , author =. International Conference on Learning Representations , year =
[33]

2025 , pages =

Rozanov, Nikolai and Rei, Marek , booktitle =. 2025 , pages =

2025
[34]

2026 , url =

Pan, Zhiming and Luo, Junyu and Xiao, Zhiping and Ding, Kaize and Luo, Xiao and Zhang, Ming , journal =. 2026 , url =

2026
[35]

2026 , pages =

Wang, Tong and Xu, Pei and Cao, Shiyue and Yang, Likun and Li, Daipeng and Jiao, Jianbin and Huang, Kaiqi , booktitle =. 2026 , pages =

2026
[36]

and Thangali, Avinash and Pan, Zijie and Shekhar, Shivani and Ge, Yirou and Li, Yixi and Kona, Uma and Pang, Linsey and Mehrotra, Prakhar , booktitle =

Chuang, Yun-Shiuan and Kulkarni, Chaitanya and Chiu, Alec M. and Thangali, Avinash and Pan, Zijie and Shekhar, Shivani and Ge, Yirou and Li, Yixi and Kona, Uma and Pang, Linsey and Mehrotra, Prakhar , booktitle =. Toward Scalable Verifiable Reward: Proxy State-Based Evaluation...

2026 doi
[37]

2026 , eprint =

Beyond Absolute Imitation: Anchored Residual Guidance for Privileged On-Policy Distillation , author =. 2026 , eprint =

2026
[38]

2026 , eprint =

Bridging Reasoning Trajectories in On-Policy Distillation via Near-Future Guidance , author =. 2026 , eprint =

2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

2015 , eprint =

Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network , author =. 2015 , eprint =

2015

[2] [2]

Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , year =

Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillation , author =. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , year =. doi:10.18653/v1/D16-1139 , url =

doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1139 2016

[3] [3]

Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning , year =

Born Again Neural Networks , author =. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning , year =

work page

[4] [4]

International Conference on Learning Representations , year =

On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakes , author =. International Conference on Learning Representations , year =

[5] [5]

2024 , url =

Gu, Yuxian and Dong, Li and Wei, Furu and Huang, Minlie , booktitle =. 2024 , url =

work page 2024

[6] [6]

2026 , eprint =

Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillation , author =. 2026 , eprint =

2026

[7] [7]

2026 , eprint =

Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Models , author =. 2026 , eprint =

2026

[8] [8]

2604.10674 , archivePrefix =

Wang, Hao and Wang, Guozhi and Xiao, Han and Zhou, Yufeng and Pan, Yue and Wang, Jichao and Xu, Ke and Wen, Yafei and Ruan, Xiaohu and Chen, Xiaoxin and Qi, Honggang , year =. 2604.10674 , archivePrefix =

arXiv