Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 46 references

Sublattice-resolved coherent phonon dynamics in charge density waves

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read By tuning a soft X-ray probe to the Eu M absorption edges, time-resolved resonant X-ray scattering resolves three coherent phonon modes in EuTe4 and reveals a previously unseen Eu-sublattice charge-order component.

desk verdict A genuinely useful demonstration that tr-RXS can separate coherent phonons by sublattice; the qualitative claims are solid, but the quantitative two-component decomposition needs error analysis before the amplitude ratios are trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06456 v1 pith:AOTFDTWD submitted 2026-08-06 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Kyoung Hun Oh , Honglie Ning , Zongqi Shen , Yifan Su , Jack Maier , Gyeongbo Kang , Hyeongi Choi , Dong Wu
show 10 more authors
Qiaomei Liu Hyun-Woo J. Kim Seunghyeok Ha Jaehwon Kim Byungjune Lee B. J. Kim N. L. Wang Yao Wang Hoyoung Jang Nuh Gedik
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords time-resolvedresonantX-rayscatteringchargedensitywavecoherentphononssublattice-resolveddynamicsEuTe4element-specificphononeigenvectorssoftprobe
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that time-resolved resonant X-ray scattering can be tuned to a specific element's absorption edge to tell which atoms are moving in each coherent phonon mode, without needing to track many Bragg peaks or rely on energy-resolution-limited spectroscopies. Applying the method to the charge density wave material EuTe4, the authors find three coherent phonon modes at about 0.85, 1.3, and 1.6 THz with distinct sublattice character: the lowest is Te-dominated, the highest is Eu-dominated, and the middle one is mixed. Along the way, they obtain evidence that the CDW is not confined to the Te monolayers: an additional, previously unreported charge-order component develops on the Eu sublattice with the same wavevector. Because the approach works in the time domain and scans X-ray energy, it sidesteps the energy-resolution ceiling of inelastic X-ray scattering and should generalize to other multi-element materials.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is equation (1): the normalized CDW intensity at X-ray energy $E$ and delay $t$ is written as a weighted average $I(E,t) = (a_l I_{\mathrm{Te}}(t) + a_c(E) I_{\mathrm{Eu}}(t))/(a_l + a_c(E))$, where $I_{\mathrm{Te}}$ and $I_{\mathrm{Eu}}$ are the Te and Eu sublattice order-parameter dynamics, $a_l$ is an energy-independent Te weight, and $a_c(E)$ is an energy-dependent Eu weight whose line shape is read off the resonant enhancement of the static CDW peak across the Eu M edges. This identity turns a set of time traces measured at several probe energies into a determined system from which the two sublattice dynamics can be globally fitted, after normalizing for probe penetration depth. The second ingredient is the time-domain readout: Fourier-transforming the oscillatory part of the decoupled traces separates the modes by frequency without the energy-resolution limits of inelastic scattering.

What would settle it

Record the CDW diffraction intensity in a fully detuned probe (more than about 10 eV below the Eu M5 edge) after penetration-depth correction and Fourier-transform it: the paper's decomposition predicts that the decoupled Te trace contains no 1.6 THz component, so a robust 1.6 THz oscillation there would falsify the Eu-only assignment and the two-weight decomposition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims the following: when the incident X-ray energy is placed on the Eu M4/M5 absorption edges, the CDW superlattice diffraction peak gains a resonant enhancement that can only come from charge modulation on the Eu sublattice, establishing that EuTe4's CDW has an Eu component in addition to the known Te-lattice distortion. Using the energy dependence of that enhancement to decompose the time-dependent diffraction intensity into separate Te and Eu order parameters, the authors extract two sublattice-resolved time traces. Fourier analysis of these traces yields three coherent phonon modes at approximately 0.85, 1.3, and 1.6 THz: the first involves mainly Te monolayer motion, the third mainly EuTe spacer-layer motion, and the middle involves both. Density functional theory phonon eigenvectors at 0.70, 1.33, and 1.65 THz match these assignments. The claim is therefore that energy-dependent time-resolved resonant X-ray scattering provides element-level resolution of coherent phonon eigenvectors in a multi-element CDW material.

Load-bearing premise

The whole separation into Te and Eu dynamics rests on assuming the measured intensity at each X-ray energy is a clean, weighted sum of a pure Te signal and a pure Eu signal, with the Te weight independent of energy; if the off-resonant X-rays also see Eu, or the weights do not cleanly separate the sublattices, the assignment of each mode to a sublattice breaks down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Targeted THz driving can selectively excite the 0.85 THz Te-dominated mode or the 1.6 THz Eu-dominated mode in EuTe4, providing a route to control the CDW sublattice by sublattice.
  • The decomposition method transfers to any multi-element material with element-specific absorption edges, including CDW superstructures and van der Waals heterostructures.
  • Models and calculations of EuTe4's electronic structure must include an Eu-sublattice charge modulation at the same wavevector as the Te CDW, not only the Te monolayer distortion.
  • Soft phonons below roughly 10 THz, which energy-domain inelastic scattering cannot resolve, become addressable in frequency by this time-domain resonant scattering approach.
  • The mixed character of the 1.3 THz mode shows dynamic coupling between Te monolayers and EuTe spacer layers, relevant to interlayer order.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Applying the same energy-scanning decomposition at the Te M edges would provide a consistency check: if the extracted Te dynamics reproduce the off-resonance trace, the model's energy-independent $a_l$ assumption is validated.
  • The roughly 0.1 THz difference between the Te and Eu FFT peaks near 1.3 THz hints that two closely spaced phonon modes, rather than a single mixed mode, may be present; longer time windows or higher fluence could split them.
  • Extending the scan across momentum transfer $q$ could map how the sublattice character of each mode disperses, distinguishing amplitude-type from phase-type CDW dynamics.
  • If the Eu charge component is intrinsic rather than a hybridization artifact, resonant pumping at the Eu M edge may allow direct optical addressing of the Eu sublattice order, a control channel not accessible through the Te sublattice.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The authors use time-resolved resonant X-ray scattering (tr-RXS) on the charge density wave material EuTe4, tuning the soft X-ray probe energy on and off the Eu M4/M5 absorption edges. They observe three coherent phonon modes near 0.85, 1.3, and 1.6 THz whose FFT visibility depends strongly on probe energy, and they interpret this as sublattice selectivity: a Te-dominated mode, an Eu-dominated mode, and a mixed mode. To make this quantitative, they introduce a two-component decomposition of the normalized CDW diffraction intensity (Eq. 1) as a weighted sum of independent Te and Eu order-parameter dynamics, with weights a_l and a_c(E) obtained from the energy-dependent equilibrium diffraction intensity. They then extract decoupled Te and Eu time traces, band-pass filter them at the three phonon frequencies, and compare with DFT phonon eigenvectors that suggest modes at 0.70, 1.65, and 1.33 THz with corresponding Te, Eu, and mixed character. The paper also claims a previously unreported Eu-sublattice charge order component in EuTe4, supported by the resonant enhancement of the CDW peak at the Eu edges.

Significance. If the quantitative decomposition is valid, the work introduces a broadly applicable tr-RXS protocol for sublattice-resolved coherent phonon identification in multi-element CDW materials, circumventing the energy-resolution limits of RIXS. The qualitative contrast between resonant and off-resonant FFT spectra is compelling and the central frequency identification is not circular, since the phonon frequencies are obtained from Fourier transforms of the data rather than from the decomposition model. The paper also provides a useful demonstration that resonant enhancement can reveal an Eu charge-order component not previously reported. However, the quantitative disentangling step rests on assumptions about energy-independent Te weights and on the same energy-dependent data used to fix the weights, and the manuscript does not report propagated uncertainties; these issues must be addressed before the strength of the quantitative claims can be assessed.

major comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (1), Fig. 3B] The central quantitative claim is the decomposition I(E,t) = (a_l I_Te(t) + a_c(E) I_Eu(t))/(a_l + a_c(E)), with a_l assumed independent of energy over the full 1076-1180 eV range. This assumption is load-bearing: if the off-resonant signal retains a non-negligible Eu resonant contribution, or if the Te non-resonant form factor and absorption corrections vary appreciably across the Eu M4/M5 edges, then the extracted I_Te(t) and I_Eu(t) are contaminated and the Te/Eu amplitude ratio of the 1.3 THz mode is not reliable. The weights are also determined from the same energy-dependent equilibrium diffraction intensity that normalizes the data, and no error propagation is reported. Please provide a quantitative justification for the energy independence of a_l (for example, calculated energy-dependent structure factors or a control measurement at the Te edge) and report uncertainties on a_l, a_c(E), and the extracted time traces.
  2. [Quantitative disentangling, Fig. 3A] The main text states that the penetration-depth-corrected time traces in Fig. 3A 'collapse onto a single curve,' yet the raw traces in Fig. 2A and their FFTs in Fig. 2B are clearly energy-dependent. If the full time traces, including oscillations, collapse after correction, then Eq. (1) cannot be inverted; if only the non-oscillatory melting background collapses, this must be stated explicitly. This ambiguity is central to the disentangling claim and should be resolved, for example by showing the corrected traces with the oscillatory components emphasized and by quantifying the residual spread among energies.
  3. [Fig. 3E,F] The acknowledged ~0.1 THz difference between the features near 1.3 THz in the Eu-decoupled and Te-decoupled FFT spectra is under-modeled. If these are two distinct phonon modes rather than a single mode, the single-mode band-pass filtering and the mixed-character assignment of the 1.3 THz mode become under-resolved. Please add a quantitative mode-discrimination analysis, such as two-oscillator fits with a statistical model comparison or a resolution-limited spectral decomposition, before treating this feature as a single mode.
  4. [Fig. 4, DFT comparison] The DFT comparison is explicitly hedged in the caption, where the calculated modes are called 'representative rather than unique assignment,' and the calculated 0.70 THz mode differs from the measured 0.85 THz mode by about 18%. Because the agreement with theory is used to corroborate the sublattice character of the modes, the manuscript should either provide a systematic assignment procedure (e.g., eigenvector overlap or displacement-participation ratios for nearby modes) or explicitly restrict the DFT claim to qualitative agreement only.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption uses 'Tr-RXS' while the text uses 'tr-RXS'; please unify the abbreviation.
  2. [Eq. (1) and Fig. 3B] The normalization convention for I(E,t) and for the weights a_l and a_c(E) is not fully specified. Please state whether I(E,0)=1 at all energies and how the absolute scale of the weights is fixed in Fig. 3B.
  3. [Fig. 3A] The claim that the corrected time traces 'collapse onto a single curve' should be supported by a quantitative measure, such as the RMS deviation among traces, since the eye is not sufficient given the multiple overlapping curves.
  4. [Figs. 2B and 3E,F] Adding error bars or shaded confidence intervals to the FFT spectra would make the energy-dependent visibility contrast and the 0.1 THz difference more assessable.
  5. [Throughout] The manuscript uses both 'space layer' and 'spacer layer' for the EuTe layers; please use one term consistently.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: frequencies and sublattice assignments come from raw FFTs and independent DFT, not from the fitted decomposition weights.

full rationale

The central claims are not circular. The three phonon frequencies (0.85, 1.3, 1.6 THz) are identified by FFT of the raw energy-dependent tr-RXS time traces (Fig. 2) before any model decomposition is introduced; Eq. (1) is a forward model used only to separate the already-visible oscillatory components into Te and Eu contributions. The weights a_l and a_c(E) are calibrated from the equilibrium energy-dependent CDW intensity (Fig. 3B), while the time-dependent I_Te(t) and I_Eu(t) are extracted from the multi-energy data; the extracted FFTs are not used to define the weights, so there is no fit-to-prediction loop. The qualitative sublattice character (0.85 Te-like, 1.6 Eu-like, 1.3 mixed) is directly visible in the raw resonant-versus-off-resonant FFT contrast (Fig. 2B) and is independently corroborated by DFT phonon eigenvectors (Fig. 4A-C), which are computed externally and not fitted to the experimental traces. The paper's own caveats, namely the ~0.1 THz difference between the 1.3 THz features in Figs. 3E,F and the statement that the DFT-assigned eigenvectors are 'representative rather than unique,' weaken the uniqueness of mode assignment but are limitations, not circularity. Self-citations to prior EuTe4 work establish the known Te-dominated CDW background but are not load-bearing for the new measurement, the resonant-enhancement evidence for an Eu component, or the DFT comparison. Concerns about energy-independence of a_l, q-resolved resonant structure factor changes, and missing propagated uncertainties are correctness and robustness issues, not reductions of the output to the input.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This paper introduces no new particles or forces; the Eu charge order is an inferred physical feature, not an invented entity. Its physical conclusions rely on the selectivity of resonant X-ray scattering, the linear two-component decomposition model, and standard Fourier analysis plus DFT eigenvectors.

free parameters (3)
  • a_l = not given in main text
    Weight of the Te CDW component in Eq. 1, assumed constant over the probe energy range. Determined from energy-dependent CDW intensity in Fig. 3B; central to separating Te and Eu contributions.
  • a_c(E) = function of photon energy, not tabulated
    Energy-dependent weight of the Eu CDW component in Eq. 1. Determined from the same energy-dependent intensity data used for the decomposition, creating potential circularity in the quantitative separation.
  • Damped-oscillator fit parameters per time trace = not reported
    Frequencies, amplitudes, damping constants, and exponential background for each time trace. Used to extract phonon frequencies and amplitudes; frequencies are cross-checked by FFT. Uncertainties are not given.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption At X-ray energies far from any resonance, the (0, 1-q_b, 2) CDW diffraction intensity is dominated by the Te charge-lattice distortion.
    Invoked in Fig. 1D and the paragraph starting 'We first examine'; it underpins the claim that off-resonant probing reports Te sublattice dynamics.
  • domain assumption The normalized intensity I(E,t) can be expressed as a weighted average of independent Te and Eu order-parameter dynamics, I(E,t) = (a_l I_Te(t) + a_c(E) I_Eu(t))/(a_l + a_c(E)).
    Eq. 1. The entire quantitative decoupling rests on this linear two-component ansatz and on a_l being E-independent while a_c(E) varies strongly with E. It is not derived from first principles.
  • domain assumption The resonant enhancement at the Eu M4/M5 edges arises from a genuine Eu-sublattice charge modulation with wavevector q, not from fluorescence background or Eu-Te hybridization.
    Stated in the first results paragraph and Supplemental Notes 3-4; the claim of a previously unreported Eu charge order depends on this interpretation.
  • domain assumption Photoexcitation does not change the average lattice structure, so diffraction intensity changes solely reflect order-parameter dynamics.
    Stated in the Figure 2A analysis and Supplemental Note 9; used to interpret oscillations as coherent phonon-induced order parameter modulation.
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA DFT phonon eigenvectors are sufficiently accurate for mode assignment.
    The authors compare measured modes to DFT (Supplemental Note 10) and concede eigenvectors are 'representative rather than unique', so the corroboration is not definitive.
  • domain assumption The 1.3 THz features in the Te and Eu decoupled spectra correspond to a single shared mode despite a ~0.1 THz difference.
    Stated in the Fig. 3E-F caption; if they were distinct modes, the mixed-character assignment would need revision.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sublattice-resolved coherent phonon dynamics in charge density waves." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AOTFDTWD

@misc{pith2026260806456,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sublattice-resolved coherent phonon dynamics in charge density waves},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AOTFDTWD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06456}
}
read the original abstract

Phonons govern fundamental material properties and play a central role in various electronic phase transitions. Coherent driving of specific phonon modes enables on-demand phase control, motivating sublattice-resolved identification of real-space phonon motions. Yet experimentally resolving these motions remains challenging, limiting precise phonon-based control. Here, we introduce a dynamical protocol to track element-resolved phonon dynamics in the charge density wave material EuTe4, in which the dominant Te-sublattice charge order is accompanied by a previously unreported Eu-sublattice component. We leverage the elemental selectivity of time-resolved resonant X-ray scattering to reveal three coherent phonon modes with distinct sublattice character, thereby disentangling Eu- and Te-dominated lattice dynamics, in good agreement with theoretical calculations of the phonon eigenvectors. This time-domain approach, which surpasses the energy-resolution limits of conventional frequency-domain inelastic scattering, provides a broadly applicable framework for decomposing coherent phonons in multi-element materials, which is crucial for the targeted control of phases of matter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06456 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Illustration of the experimental scheme. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Energy-dependent time-resolved resonant X-ray scattering (Tr-RXS) results. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Quantitatively disentangling the Te and Eu charge components dynamics. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Phonon eigenvectors and a physical picture account [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin,Solid State Physics (Holt-Saunders, 1976)

    1976

  2. [2]

    Fausti, R

    D. Fausti, R. I. Tobey, N. Dean, S. Kaiser, A. Dienst, M. C. Hoffmann, S. Pyon, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced superconductivity in a stripe- ordered cuprate, Science331, 189 (2011)

    2011

  3. [3]

    Mankowsky, A

    R. Mankowsky, A. Subedi, M. Först, S. O. Mariager, M. Chollet, H. T. Lemke, J. S. Robinson, J. M. Glow- nia, M. P. Minitti, A. Frano, M. Fechner, N. A. Spaldin, T. Loew, B. Keimer, A. Georges, and A. Cavalleri, Non- linear lattice dynamics as a basis for enhanced supercon- ductivity in YBa2Cu3O6.5, Nature516, 71 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    A. S. Disa, M. Fechner, T. F. Nova, B. Liu, M. Först, D. Prabhakaran, P. G. Radaelli, and A. Cavalleri, Po- larizing an antiferromagnet by optical engineering of the crystal field, Nature Physics16, 937 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    T. F. Nova, A. S. Disa, M. Fechner, and A. Cavalleri, Metastable ferroelectricity in optically strained SrTiO3, Science364, 1075 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    A. S. Disa, T. F. Nova, and A. Cavalleri, Engineering crystal structures with light, Nature Physics17, 1087 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    A. C. Albrecht, On the Theory of Raman Intensities, The Journal of Chemical Physics34, 1476 (1961)

    work page 1961

  8. [8]

    Data and network services at PAL-XFEL were supported by GSDC and KREONET, provided by the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI)

    of the PAL-XFEL funded by the Korea government (MSIT). Data and network services at PAL-XFEL were supported by GSDC and KREONET, provided by the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI). ∗ These authors contributed equally to this work † email: gedik@mit.edu

    work page

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    D. L. De Faria, S. Venâncio Silva, and M. T. De Oliveira, Ramanmicrospectroscopyofsomeironoxidesandoxyhy- droxides, Journal of Raman Spectroscopy28, 873 (1997)

    1997

  2. [10]

    C.-Y. Kuo, M. M. F. Vieira, and C. K. N. Patel, Infrared Spectroscopy of Phonons in Hexagonal-Phase Solid Hy- drogen, Physical Review Letters49, 1284 (1982)

    1982

  3. [11]

    Merklein, I

    M. Merklein, I. V. Kabakova, A. Zarifi, and B. J. Eggle- ton, 100 years of Brillouin scattering: Historical and fu- ture perspectives, Applied Physics Reviews9, 041306 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    M. Hase, K. Mizoguchi, H. Harima, S.-i. Nakashima, and K. Sakai, Dynamics of coherent phonons in bismuth gen- erated by ultrashort laser pulses, Physical Review B58, 5448 (1998)

    1998

  5. [13]

    J.Qi, X.Chen, W.Yu, P.Cadden-Zimansky, D.Smirnov, N. H. Tolk, I. Miotkowski, H. Cao, Y. P. Chen, Y. Wu, 6 S. Qiao, and Z. Jiang, Ultrafast carrier and phonon dy- namics in Bi2Se3 crystals, Applied Physics Letters97, 182102 (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    Ibach, Optical Surface Phonons in Zinc Oxide De- tected by Slow-Electron Spectroscopy, Physical Review Letters24, 1416 (1970)

    H. Ibach, Optical Surface Phonons in Zinc Oxide De- tected by Slow-Electron Spectroscopy, Physical Review Letters24, 1416 (1970)

    1970

  7. [15]

    Mittal, S

    R. Mittal, S. L. Chaplot, and N. Choudhury, Modeling of anomalous thermodynamic properties using lattice dy- namics and inelastic neutron scattering, Progress in Ma- terials Science51, 211 (2006)

    2006

  8. [16]

    Burkel, J

    E. Burkel, J. Peisl, and B. Dorner, Observation of Inelas- tic X-Ray Scattering from Phonons, Europhys. Lett.3, 957 (1987)

    1987

  9. [17]

    J. Fink, E. Schierle, E. Weschke, and J. Geck, Reso- nant elastic soft x-ray scattering, Reports on Progress in Physics76, 056502 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    W. S. Lee, Y. D. Chuang, R. G. Moore, Y. Zhu, L. Patthey, M. Trigo, D. H. Lu, P. S. Kirchmann, O. Krupin, M. Yi, M. Langner, N. Huse, J. S. Robinson, Y. Chen, S. Y. Zhou, G. Coslovich, B. Huber, D. A. Reis, R. A. Kaindl, R. W. Schoenlein, D. Doering, P. Denes, W. F. Schlotter,...

    2012

  11. [19]

    Y. D. Chuang, W. S. Lee, Y. F. Kung, A. P. Sorini, B. Moritz, R. G. Moore, L. Patthey, M. Trigo, D. H. Lu, P. S. Kirchmann, M. Yi, O. Krupin, M. Langner, Y. Zhu, S. Y. Zhou, D. A. Reis, N. Huse, J. S. Robin- son, R. A. Kaindl, R. W. Schoenlein, S. L. Johnson, M. Först, D. Doer...

    2013

  12. [20]

    R. G. Moore, W. S. Lee, P. S. Kirchman, Y. D. Chuang, A.F.Kemper, M.Trigo, L.Patthey, D.H.Lu, O.Krupin, M. Yi, D. A. Reis, D. Doering, P. Denes, W. F. Schlotter, J. J. Turner, G. Hays, P. Hering, T. Benson, J.-H. Chu, T.P.Devereaux, I.R.Fisher, Z.Hussain,andZ.-X.Shen, Ultrafas...

    2016

  13. [21]

    Rettig, C

    L. Rettig, C. Dornes, N. Thielemann-Kühn, N. Pon- tius, H. Zabel, D. L. Schlagel, T. A. Lograsso, M. Chol- let, A. Robert, M. Sikorski, S. Song, J. M. Glownia, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, S. L. Johnson, and U. Staub, Itinerant and Localized Magnetization Dynamics in An- tiferromag...

    2016

  14. [22]

    Rettig, A

    L. Rettig, A. Caviezel, S. O. Mariager, G. Ingold, C. Dornes, S. W. Huang, J. A. Johnson, M. Radovic, T. Huber, T. Kubacka, A. Ferrer, H. T. Lemke, M. Chol- let, D. Zhu, J. M. Glownia, M. Sikorski, A. Robert, M. Nakamura, M. Kawasaki, Y. Tokura, S. L. Johnson, P. Beaud, and U....

    2019

  15. [23]

    Y. W. Windsor, S. E. Lee, D. Zahn, V. Borisov, D. Thonig, K. Kliemt, A. Ernst, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, N. Pontius, U. Staub, C. Krellner, D. V. Vyalikh, O. Eriksson, and L. Rettig, Exchange scaling of ultra- fast angular momentum transfer in 4f antiferromagnets, Nature Materia...

    2022

  16. [24]

    H. Jang, H. Ueda, H. D. Kim, M. Kim, K. W. Shin, K. H. Kim, S. Y. Park, H. J. Shin, P. Borisov, M. J. Rosseinsky, D. Jang, H. Choi, I. Eom, U. Staub, and S. H. Chun, 4D Visualization of a Nonthermal Coherent Magnon in a Laser Heated Lattice by an X-ray Free Electron Laser, Adv...

    2023

  17. [25]

    Jiang, Q

    X. Jiang, Q. Qiu, C. Peng, H. Jang, W. Chen, X. Jin, L. Yue, B. Lee, S.-Y. Park, M. Kim, H.-D. Kim, X. Cai, Q. Li, T. Dong, N. Wang, J. J. Turner, Y. Li, Y. Wang, and Y. Peng, Using magnetic dynamics to measure the spin gap in a candidate Kitaev material, npj Quantum Materials...

    2025

  18. [26]

    L. J. Ament, M. Van Veenendaal, T. P. Devereaux, J. P. Hill, and J. Van Den Brink, Resonant inelastic x-ray scat- tering studies of elementary excitations, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics83, 705 (2011)

    2011

  19. [27]

    F. M. de Groot, M. W. Haverkort, H. Elnaggar, A. Juhin, K. J. Zhou, and P. Glatzel, Resonant inelastic X-ray scat- tering, Nature Reviews Methods Primers4, 45 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    D. Wu, Q. M. Liu, S. L. Chen, G. Y. Zhong, J. Su, L. Y. Shi, L. Tong, G. Xu, P. Gao, and N. L. Wang, Layered semiconductor EuTe4 with charge density wave order in square tellurium sheets, Physical Review Mate- rials3, 024002 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    B. Q. Lv, A. Zong, D. Wu, A. Rozhkov, B. V. Fine, S.- D. Chen, M. Hashimoto, D.-H. Lu, M. Li, Y.-B. Huang, J. P. Ruff, D. A. Walko, Z. Chen, I. Hwang, Y. Su, X. Shen, X. Wang, F. Han, H. C. Po, Y. Wang, P. Jarillo- Herrero, X. Wang, H. Zhou, C.-J. Sun, H. Wen, Z.-X. Shen, N. W...

    2022

  22. [30]

    Rathore, A

    R. Rathore, A. Pathak, M. K. Gupta, R. Mittal, R. Kulkarni, A. Thamizhavel, H. Singhal, A. H. Said, andD.Bansal,Evolutionofstaticchargedensitywaveor- der, amplitude mode dynamics, and suppression of Kohn anomalies at the hysteretic transition in EuTe4, Physical Review B107, 02...

    2023

  23. [31]

    Q. Q. Zhang, Y. Shi, K. Y. Zhai, W. X. Zhao, X. Du, J. S. Zhou, X. Gu, R. Z. Xu, Y. D. Li, Y. F. Guo, Z. K. Liu, C. Chen, S.-K. Mo, T. K. Kim, C. Cacho, J. W. Yu, W. Li, Y. L. Chen, J.-H. Chu, and L. X. Yang, Ther- mal hysteretic behavior and negative magnetoresistance in the ...

    2023

  24. [32]

    B. Q. Lv, Y. Su, A. Zong, Q. Liu, D. Wu, N. F. Q. Yuan, Z. Nie, J. Li, S. Sarker, S. Meng, J. P. C. Ruff, N. L. Wang, and N. Gedik, Large moiré superstructure of stacked incommensurate charge density waves, Nature Materials25, 420 (2026)

    2026

  25. [33]

    Xiao, W.-H

    K. Xiao, W.-H. Dong, X. Wang, J. Yu, D. Fu, Z. Hu, Y. Guo, Q. Zhang, X. Hou, Y. Guo, L. Yang, Y. Xu, P. Tang, W. Duan, Q. Xue, and W. Li, Hidden Charge Order and Multiple Electronic Instabilities in EuTe 4, Nano Letters24, 7681 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    W. S. Lee, A. P. Sorini, M. Yi, Y. D. Chuang, B. Moritz, W. L. Yang, J. H. Chu, H. H. Kuo, A. G. Gonzalez, I. R. Fisher, Z. Hussain, T. P. Devereaux, and Z. X. Shen, Res- 7 onant enhancement of charge density wave diffraction in therare-earthtritellurides,PhysicalReviewB85,155...

    2012

  27. [35]

    H. Li, G. Fabbris, A. H. Said, J. P. Sun, Y. X. Jiang, J. X. Yin, Y. Y. Pai, S. Yoon, A. R. Lupini, C. S. Nel- son, Q. W. Yin, C. S. Gong, Z. J. Tu, H. C. Lei, J. G. Cheng, M.Z.Hasan, Z.Wang, B.Yan, R.Thomale, H.N. Lee, and H. Miao, Discovery of conjoined charge density waves ...

    2022

  28. [36]

    A. Zong, A. Kogar, Y.-Q. Bie, T. Rohwer, C. Lee, E. Bal- dini, E. Ergeçen, M. B. Yilmaz, B. Freelon, E. J. Sie, H. Zhou, J. Straquadine, P. Walmsley, P. E. Dolgirev, A. V. Rozhkov, I. R. Fisher, P. Jarillo-Herrero, B. V. Fine, and N. Gedik, Evidence for topological defects in ...

    2019

  29. [37]

    H. Ning, K. H. Oh, Y. Su, A. von Hoegen, Z. Porter, A. Capa Salinas, Q. L. Nguyen, M. Chollet, T. Sato, V. Esposito, M. C. Hoffmann, A. White, C. Melendrez, D. Zhu, S. D. Wilson, and N. Gedik, Dynamical decod- ing of the competition between charge density waves in a kagome sup...

    2024

  30. [38]

    H.Ning, K.H.Oh, Y.Su, Z.D.Shi, D.Wu, Q.Liu, B.Lv, A. Zong, G. Kang, H. Choi, H.-W. J. Kim, S. Ha, J. Kim, S. Sarker, J. P. Ruff, B. Kim, N. Wang, T. Senthil, H. Jang, and N. Gedik, Bidirectional Ultrafast Control of Charge Density Waves via Phase Competition, Physi- cal Review...

    2025

  31. [39]

    K. H. Oh, Y. Su, H. Ning, B. Q. Lv, A. Zong, D. Wu, Q. Liu, G. Kang, H. Choi, H.-W. J. Kim, S. Ha, J. Kim, S. Sarker, J. P. C. Ruff, X. Shen, D. Luo, S. Weathersby, P. Kramer, X. Cheng, D. Choi, D. Azoury, M. Mogi, B. J. Kim, N. L. Wang, H. Jang, and N. Gedik, Dynamics of a jo...

    2025 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Huber, S

    T. Huber, S. Mariager, A. Ferrer, H. Schäfer, J. Johnson, S. Grübel, A. Lübcke, L. Huber, T. Kubacka, C. Dornes, C. Laulhe, S. Ravy, G. Ingold, P. Beaud, J. Demsar, and S. Johnson, Coherent Structural Dynamics of a Prototyp- ical Charge-Density-Wave-to-Metal Transition, Physic...

    2014

  33. [41]

    Singer, S

    A. Singer, S. Patel, R. Kukreja, V. Uhlíř, J. Wingert, S. Festersen, D. Zhu, J. Glownia, H. Lemke, S. Nel- son, M. Kozina, K. Rossnagel, M. Bauer, B. Murphy, O. Magnussen, E. Fullerton, and O. Shpyrko, Photoin- duced Enhancement of the Charge Density Wave Ampli- tude, Physical...

    2016

  34. [42]

    Trigo, P

    M. Trigo, P. Giraldo-Gallo, M. E. Kozina, T. Henighan, M. P. Jiang, H. Liu, J. N. Clark, M. Chollet, J. M. Glow- nia, D. Zhu, T. Katayama, D. Leuenberger, P. S. Kirch- mann, I. R. Fisher, Z. X. Shen, and D. A. Reis, Coherent order parameter dynamics in SmTe3, Physical Review B...

    2019

  35. [43]

    Q. L. Nguyen, R. A. Duncan, G. Orenstein, Y. Huang, V. Krapivin, G. De La Peña, C. Ornelas-Skarin, D. A. Reis, P. Abbamonte, S. Bettler, M. Chollet, M. C. Hoff- mann, M. Hurley, S. Kim, P. S. Kirchmann, Y. Kubota, F. Mahmood, A. Miller, T. Osaka, K. Qu, T. Sato, D. P. Shoemake...

    2023

  36. [44]

    A. J. Achkar, F. He, R. Sutarto, J. Geck, H. Zhang, Y. J. Kim, and D. G. Hawthorn, Resonant X-ray scattering measurements of a spatial modulation of the Cu 3d and O 2p energies in stripe-ordered cuprate superconductors, Physical Review Letters110, 017001 (2013)

    2013

  37. [45]

    Takubo, R

    K. Takubo, R. Comin, D. Ootsuki, T. Mizokawa, H. Wa- dati, Y. Takahashi, G. Shibata, A. Fujimori, R. Sutarto, F. He, S. Pyon, K. Kudo, M. Nohara, G. Levy, I. S. Elfi- mov, G. A. Sawatzky, and A. Damascelli, Bond order and the role of ligand states in stripe-modulated IrTe2, Ph...

    2014

  38. [46]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Physical Review Letters77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.