Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 174 references

Toward Intelligent Skies: Signal Processing and AI Foundations of Low-Altitude Wireless Networks

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A unified low-altitude wireless network could carry drone data, control, sensing, and computing, all in one 3D infrastructure.

desk verdict A solid, clearly written tutorial that gives the LAWN field a useful shared vocabulary, but the central architecture is a taxonomy rather than a validated design, and the only quantitative support is a self-cited replot. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08225 v1 pith:NDZ5BILN submitted 2026-08-08 eess.SP cs.SYeess.SY

Weijie Yuan , Geng Sun , Jiacheng Wang , Jun Wu , Yuanhao Cui , Jiahui Li , Wei Zhang , George K. Karagiannidis
show 2 more authors
Sumei Sun Yonina C. Eldar
This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SPcs.SYeess.SY
keywords low-altitudewirelessnetworksUAVcommunicationsintegratedsensingandcommunicationsignalprocessingartificialintelligence3Dnetworkarchitecturefunctionalplanesrate-costcontrolbounds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a tutorial that tries to establish that low-altitude wireless networks (LAWNs) should be understood as one unified three-dimensional infrastructure, not as a collection of separate drone-communication, sensing, or traffic-management systems. It claims that a LAWN can simultaneously carry payload data, safety-critical control, environmental sensing, and distributed computation for aerial services below 3,000 meters, and that this integration is what makes the 'intelligent skies' vision tractable. The paper's contribution is a systematic architecture built from altitude-based layers and four functional planes, together with a signal-processing and AI toolkit for turning that architecture into working systems. A sympathetic reader would care because the framework gives regulators, standards bodies, and engineers a common structure for designing and testing low-altitude networks.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the LAWN architectural model: three altitude-based layers and four functional planes (data, control, sensing, computing/intelligence), described as a nervous system. The altitude layers map operational regimes to channel conditions, risk profiles, and infrastructure choices, while the planes modularize end-to-end function and define cross-plane scheduling. The argument is carried by this decomposition in the sense that every survey topic—ISAC waveforms, factor-graph receivers, Kalman and particle filters, reinforcement-learning agents, large-language-model supervisors—is placed into one of these planes or layers. A secondary load-bearing mechanism is the multi-function co-design formulation, which couples transmit beamforming, sensing covariance, and control inputs in a single optimization, with rate–cost bounds and outage constraints giving quantitative targets.

What would settle it

A field measurement campaign in a dense urban corridor could settle the tiering claim: if line-of-sight probability, handover rate, and outage probability do not cluster around the 100 m and 1,000 m boundaries, the altitude stratification is not universal. Separately, a testbed that tries to run control-plane traffic and sensing on the same integrated waveform while meeting the paper's stated reliability targets (for example sub-10 ms latency and greater than 99.999% reliability) would test whether the unified single-infrastructure claim holds under real hardware constraints.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a LAWN 'integrates these otherwise separate functions into a unified low-altitude infrastructure spanning communication, sensing, computing, control, and airspace management.' The paper proposes a working stratification of low-altitude airspace into three tiers—below 100 m, 100–1,000 m, and 1,000–3,000 m—and four functional planes: data, control, sensing, and computing/intelligence, which together act like a nervous system exchanging state and reconfiguring resources. On this substrate, the tutorial argues, signal processing (3D channel models, ISAC waveform and receiver design, localization and tracking, multi-function co-design) and AI (discriminative and generative models, reinforcement learning, foundation models) can be deployed hierarchically across onboard, edge, and cloud resources. The paper supports the synthesis with quantitative design anchors such as stabilizability rate thresholds, rate–cost bounds for closed-loop control, outage-constrained predictive control, and an AI-driven multi-tier case study.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that slicing low-altitude airspace into three fixed altitude bands and four functional planes is a generally useful and stable description of real LAWNs, and that the same physical nodes can simultaneously carry data, safety control, sensing, and computing—an assumption presented through examples and a case study rather than field evidence across many environments.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Regulators and standards bodies gain a common vocabulary: altitude tiers and functional planes let cellular, traffic-management, and spectrum rules be mapped onto one LAWN architecture.
  • Signal processing and AI become co-design partners rather than separate layers, so waveform design, beamforming, localization, and learning-based decisions can share the same physical resources.
  • Control theory enters network design directly: stabilizability rate thresholds and rate–cost bounds tell operators the minimum communication rate needed to keep a drone formation controllable at a given control cost.
  • Rate-splitting multiple access becomes a natural fit for LAWN control traffic, since common streams can carry system-level safety context while private streams serve individual plants.
  • The reported case study indicates that LLM-guided adjustment of reinforcement-learning hyperparameters can stabilize training and improve the rate–handover trade-off in a multi-tier satellite–high-altitude-platform–ground network.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to replace the fixed 100 m and 1,000 m boundaries with data-driven layer discovery, since local building heights, weather, and regulation may shift the true regime boundaries.
  • The nervous-system analogy suggests formalizing cross-plane interfaces as contracts with bounded latency and state age; a control-theoretic analysis could test whether the four-plane loop remains stable under realistic delays.
  • The rate–cost bounds imply a direct spectrum-dimensioning rule for LAWN command-and-control links: required rate grows unboundedly as the target LQR cost approaches its minimum, which could be validated in hardware-in-the-loop experiments.
  • The LLM-guided hyperparameter results invite an ablation separating the benefit of adaptive hyperparameters from the choice of a particular LLM, which the paper leaves for future work.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This tutorial proposes low-altitude wireless networks (LAWNs) as a unified 3D infrastructure integrating communication, sensing, computing, control, and airspace management. It organizes the field into altitude-based layers and four functional planes, surveys signal processing fundamentals and AI techniques, and presents a case study combining an LLM meta-controller with a TQC-based DRL policy for a LEO/HAP/user network. The paper concludes with open challenges in architecture design, signal processing-AI co-design, security, experimentation, and standardization.

Significance. The paper is a comprehensive, current, and well-structured entry point to an emerging cross-disciplinary area. Its strengths include the historical and regulatory tables, the compact treatment of standard signal-processing results (ISAC, message passing, tracking, rate-cost bounds), and an explicit research-challenges section that candidly lists unresolved problems. The case study illustrates a concrete LLM-guided DRL pipeline, which is valuable as an example of the proposed integration. The central limitation is that the proposed functional-plane architecture is not specified to the level of interfaces or information flows, and no independent evidence is provided that the altitude-layer and functional-plane decomposition is canonical; this is an important caveat for a tutorial that aims to shape future research and standardization.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II.A and Section VI.A.1] The central architectural claim that the four functional planes 'collectively provide a coordinated substrate' (Section II.A.2.e) is asserted but not specified. Section VI.A.1 concedes that 'what information should flow across planes, at which timescales, and via which standardized interfaces' remains unresolved, and the case study in Section V does not instantiate the control plane, sensing plane, or computing/intelligence plane. As written, the reader cannot distinguish a general architecture from an arbitrary topic labeling. Please add at least one concrete cross-plane information-flow example with message types and timescales, or explicitly reposition the planes as a research taxonomy rather than an implemented substrate.
  2. [Section II.A.1] The three-tier altitude partition (below 100 m, 100-1,000 m, 1,000-3,000 m) is introduced as 'a useful working stratification' without empirical support or citation, and the claimed distinct channel conditions and risk profiles for each tier are not justified. Since the tutorial's architectural framework rests on these layers, either cite measurements or field trials that motivate the thresholds, or state explicitly that these are illustrative ranges for structuring the discussion.
  3. [Section V.C] The evaluation claims for LTQC-DAM are presented as point estimates replotted from [165] with no error bars, no confidence intervals, and no multi-seed statistics. The statement that 'DeepSeek is more consistent with this adjustment pattern' and 'may partly explain its smoother convergence' is not supported by the displayed single-run reward curves. If this case study is meant to illustrate signal-processing-AI integration, provide artifacts or at least multi-seed statistics; otherwise, present it explicitly as illustrative output from prior work without comparative claims.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section III.D.1] The first paragraph of Section III.D.1 duplicates Section III.A.1 verbatim through the outage-probability sentence, interrupting the new material on control stabilizability; this copy-paste error should be removed.
  2. [Section VI.B.1] The phrase 'exhibiting intermittent LoS/NLoS transitions and and blockage dynamics' contains a duplicated 'and' that should be corrected.
  3. [Section V.C] The figures in Section V.C are described as 'replotted using the data reported in [165]', but no underlying data or repository link is provided; please include the data or a persistent link to support reproducibility.
  4. [Section II.B] The discussion of 3GPP Releases 16-18 would benefit from explicitly naming Release 15's TR 36.777 as the baseline for aerial-UE support, since it is cited only later in the references; unifying the release timeline would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity found: a tutorial taxonomy with a self-cited illustrative case study, not a derivation chain whose outputs are forced by its inputs.

full rationale

This paper is a tutorial and survey rather than a claim of new derivation. Its central architectural assertion—that a LAWN integrates communication, sensing, computing, control, and airspace management into a unified low-altitude infrastructure—is presented as a definition and organizing framework, not as a theorem derived from earlier equations. The altitude-based layers are explicitly introduced only as 'a useful working stratification,' and the four functional planes are described as a conceptual 'nervous system' that 'exchange state, reconfigure resources, and co-optimize safety, efficiency, and mission performance.' No fitted parameter is later renamed as a prediction, and no equation in the paper is shown to be equivalent by construction to a previously assumed quantity. The technical bounds in Section III.D (stabilizability, rate-cost tradeoff, outage-constrained control, rate-distortion) are imported from external, established sources rather than from the authors' own prior work. The only quantitative demonstration, the Section V case study, is explicitly based on the authors' previous paper [165], with Figures 7 and 8 stated to be 'replotted using the data reported in [165]'; this is self-referential illustration rather than circular derivation, and the paper itself concedes in Section VI.A.1 that cross-plane interfaces remain an open issue. The self-citations to [3], [19], [165], [169], [171], and [173] are normal in a survey and do not supply a uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or fitted input that makes the tutorial's conclusions true by construction. Hence no specific circular reduction is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The paper is a tutorial, so most of its content is imported from prior literature rather than derived. The architectural claims rest on domain assumptions about altitude tiers, channel models, control-theoretic rate bounds, and aerodynamic wake models, none of which are validated with new data in this preprint. The case-study algorithm and its reported benefits come from the same authors' prior work [165].

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The airspace below 3,000 meters is a coherent networking regime with the three altitude tiers below 100 m, 100-1,000 m, and 1,000-3,000 m.
    Section II.A.1 partitions the airspace and assigns channel, interference, and regulation profiles to each tier, but no empirical validation is provided for these boundaries.
  • standard math Information-theoretic control stabilizability and rate-cost tradeoff results from [92] and [94] apply to the LAWN control setting.
    Section III.D.1 and III.D.2 use the stabilizability rate in (24) and the rate-cost bound in (30) and (34) as the foundation for the control-oriented design narrative.
  • domain assumption The Rician fading model with LoS and NLoS components adequately represents the BS-to-UAV downlink in LAWNs.
    Section III.D uses equation (20) for the ISAC channel model without fitting to measured low-altitude channel data.
  • standard math The Bernstein-type inequality and the S-procedure are valid and applicable as stated for robust beamforming.
    Lemmas 1 and 2 in Section III.D.3 are invoked to convert chance constraints and worst-case constraints into convex deterministic forms.
  • domain assumption The NASA-Burnham-Hallock vortex model captures the aerodynamic wake interactions relevant for formation energy savings.
    Section III.D.5 uses equations (51)-(54) to convert formation positions into upwash and propulsion-power savings, assuming the model transfers to multi-UAV LAWN operations.
invented entities (2)
  • Low-altitude wireless network (LAWN) as a unified infrastructure class
    purpose: Unifies communication, sensing, computing, control, and airspace management in a single 3D network concept.
    Defined in Section I.A and Section II as an architectural proposal; no field demonstrator or falsifiable prediction is provided in this paper.
  • Functional planes (data, control, sensing, computing/intelligence)
    purpose: Organizes LAWN capabilities and cross-plane scheduling in an abstract architectural model.
    Introduced in Section II.A.2 as an organizing abstraction; no standardized interface, measurable overhead, or benchmark is defined.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Toward Intelligent Skies: Signal Processing and AI Foundations of Low-Altitude Wireless Networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NDZ5BILN

@misc{pith2026260808225,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Toward Intelligent Skies: Signal Processing and AI Foundations of Low-Altitude Wireless Networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NDZ5BILN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08225}
}
read the original abstract

The rapid growth of low-altitude aerial services and applications, driven by uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs), calls for a new class of digital infrastructure beyond conventional terrestrial networks. The low-altitude wireless network (LAWN) has been proposed as dynamically reconfigurable three-dimensional architectures that integrate aerial and ground nodes to provide connectivity, sensing, and control in open, safety-critical airspace. This tutorial presents a comprehensive treatment of LAWNs from the joint perspectives of artificial intelligence (AI) and signal processing. We first review the historical evolution and architectural foundations of LAWNs, introducing altitude-based layers and functional planes, and summarizing the regulatory and standardization landscape. Building on this system view, we then discuss signal processing fundamentals for LAWNs, including 3D channel and system models, performance metrics, waveform and receiver design, localization and tracking, and multi-functionality co-design. Next, we survey AI techniques for LAWNs, covering discriminative and generative models for perception, control, resource management, and security, as well as emerging paradigms such as foundation models, large language models, and digital twins for mission planning and closed-loop optimization. To illustrate AI-signal processing integration in practice, we provide a case study of an AI-driven multi-tier LAWN with hybrid satellite, high-altitude, and ground nodes. The tutorial concludes by outlining key research challenges in architecture design, signal processing-AI co-design, safety and security, experimentation, and standardization, and by highlighting opportunities for LAWNs to evolve into dependable, AI-native infrastructure for the intelligent skies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08225 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Multi-disciplinary convergence toward low-altitude wireless networks (LAWNs). LAWNs emerge from the coupling of (i) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Architectural perspective of LAWNs in terms of altitude-based layers and functional planes. (a) Altitude-based layering partitions low [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A general factor graph representation for the factorization of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic of a representative multi-functionality co-design loop. A remote ISAC base station simultaneously supports communication, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A diagram illustrating the multi-head attention mechanism. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Framework of the LTQC-DAM algorithm for LAWN systems, newly illustrated based on our previous work [165]. The framework integrates a discriminative TQC agent for real-time decisions and a generative LLM meta-controller for adaptive hyperparameter tuning. Dynamic action…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Hyperparameter adaptation patterns across different LLMs during training, replotted using the data reported in [165]. multiple hyperparameters in a coordinated manner. When increasing the entropy temperature to encourage exploration, DeepSeek also adjusts the number of…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Training and optimization-objective performance of LTQC￾DAM, replotted using the data reported in [165]. (a) reward compar￾ison with algorithm baselines; (b) reward comparison across LLM￾guided variants; (c) downlink transmission rate; (d) satellite handover frequency.…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

174 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [165]

    LLM-guided DRL for multi-tier LEO satellite networks with hybrid FSO/RF links,

    J. Li, G. Sun, Z. Sun, J. Wang, Y . Liu, R. Zhang, D. Niyato, and S. Mao, “LLM-guided DRL for multi-tier LEO satellite networks with hybrid FSO/RF links,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 44, pp. 2393–2410, 2026

    work page 2026

  2. [3]

    From ground to sky: Architectures, applications, and challenges shaping low-altitude wireless networks,

    W. Yuan, Y . Cui, J. Wang, F. Liu, G. Sun, T. Xiang, J. Xu, S. Jin, D. Niyato, S. Coleriet al., “From ground to sky: Architectures, applications, and challenges shaping low-altitude wireless networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.12308, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  3. [19]

    Low-altitude wireless networks: A comprehensive survey,

    J. Wu, Y . Yang, W. Yuan, W. Liu, J. Wang, T. Mao, L. Zhou, Y . Cui, F. Liu, G. Sunet al., “Low-altitude wireless networks: A comprehensive survey,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.11607, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  4. [1]

    Drones market size, trends & share analysis 2030,

    M. Intelligence, “Drones market size, trends & share analysis 2030,” 2025, accessed: December 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/drones-market

    2025

  5. [2]

    Market potential and investment prospects of the low-altitude economy,

    G. Rich, “Market potential and investment prospects of the low-altitude economy,” 2025, accessed: December 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://graphenerich.com/ market-potential-and-investment-prospects-of-the-low-altitude-economy/

    2025

  6. [4]

    Normalizing unmanned aircraft systems beyond visual line of sight operations,

    F. A. Administration, “Normalizing unmanned aircraft systems beyond visual line of sight operations,” 2025, accessed: December 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/07/2025-14992/ normalizing-unmanned-aircraft-systems-beyond-visual-line-of-sight-operations

    2025

  7. [5]

    The low-altitude economy explained: 2025 update. the dramatic transformation of urban air space,

    B. Aviation, “The low-altitude economy explained: 2025 update. the dramatic transformation of urban air space,” 2025, accessed: December 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://businessaviation.aero/ evtol-news-and-electric-aircraft-news/low-altitude-economy

    2025

  8. [6]

    Open category — low risk — civil drones,

    E. U. A. S. Agency, “Open category — low risk — civil drones,” 2025, accessed: December 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/domains/drones-air-mobility/ operating-drone/open-category-low-risk-civil-drones

    2025

Show all 174 references
  1. [7]

    Unmanned aircraft registration web portal,

    T. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Tourism, “Unmanned aircraft registration web portal,” 2025, accessed: December 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.mlit.go.jp/koku/drone/en/

    2025

  2. [8]

    Beyond visual line-of-sight operations,

    C. A. S. Authority, “Beyond visual line-of-sight operations,” 2025, ac- cessed: December 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.casa.gov. au/drones/flight-authorisations/beyond-visual-line-sight-operations

    2025

  3. [9]

    Unmanned aircraft systems traffic management (UTM) – a common framework with core principles for global harmonization,

    I. C. A. Organization, “Unmanned aircraft systems traffic management (UTM) – a common framework with core principles for global harmonization,” 2023, guidance for States on UTM capabilities and har- monization with ATM. [Online]. Available: https://www.icao.int/sites/ default/...

    2023

  4. [10]

    Future technology trends of terrestrial international mobile telecommunications towards 2030 and beyond,

    ITU-R, “Future technology trends of terrestrial international mobile telecommunications towards 2030 and beyond,” https://www.itu.int/ pub/R-REP-M.2516-2024, Tech. Rep. M.2516-0, 2024

    2024

  5. [11]

    Proposal for new rules for drone operation: Brazilian civil aviation regulation (rbac) no. 100,

    N. C. A. Agency, “Proposal for new rules for drone operation: Brazilian civil aviation regulation (rbac) no. 100,” June 2025, risk-based regulatory proposal with SORA for specific operations; includes SARPAS Next Generation features. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.br/ana...

    2025

  6. [12]

    Remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) traffic management services testing,

    T. Canada, “Remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) traffic management services testing,” 2020, concept for tracking, Remote ID, and BVLOS trials; updated regulations in 2025. [Online]. Available: https: //tc.canada.ca/en/aviation/drone-safety/drone-innovation-collaboration/ ...

    2020

  7. [13]

    Drone rules 2021 and national UTM policy framework,

    D. G. of Civil Aviation, “Drone rules 2021 and national UTM policy framework,” 2021, includes DigitalSky platform for registrations and approvals. [Online]. Available: https://digitalsky.dgca.gov.in/assets/ files/National-UTM-Policy-Framework-2021-24-Oct-2021.pdf

    2021

  8. [14]

    Korea urban air mobility (K-UAM) grand challenge and K-drone system,

    I. Ministry of Land and Transport, “Korea urban air mobility (K-UAM) grand challenge and K-drone system,” 2025, urban demonstrations for safety risks and 5G networks; K-Drone for multiple drone management. [Online]. Available: https://aviationweek.com/aerospace/advanced-air-mo...

    2025

  9. [15]

    Unmanned aircraft system operations in uk airspace – policy and guidance (cap 722),

    U. C. A. Authority, “Unmanned aircraft system operations in uk airspace – policy and guidance (cap 722),” 2024, guidance for UAS operations and authorizations. [Online]. Available: https: //www.caa.co.uk/publication/download/21784

    2024

  10. [16]

    Spectrum rules and policies for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems: 5030-5091 mhz band,

    F. C. Commission, “Spectrum rules and policies for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems: 5030-5091 mhz band,” 2025, final rule for UAS command-and-control communications. [Online]. Available: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/08/2024-29967/ spectrum-rules...

    2025

  11. [17]

    L. R. Newcome,Unmanned aviation: a brief history of unmanned aerial vehicles. Aiaa, 2004

    2004

  12. [18]

    J. D. Blom,Unmanned Aerial Systems: A Historical Perspective. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: Combat Studies Institute Press, US Army Com- bined Arms Center, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.armyupress. army.mil/Portals/7/combat-studies-institute/csi-books/OP37.pdf

    2010

  13. [20]

    Integrated target control system

    D. M. Barrow and J. E. Greenwood, “Integrated target control system.” Tech. Rep., 1970

    1970

  14. [21]

    Cellular communications using aerial platforms,

    B. El-Jabu and R. Steele, “Cellular communications using aerial platforms,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 686–700, 2002

    2002

  15. [22]

    An overview of 3GPP release-15 study on enhanced LTE support for connected drones,

    S. D. Muruganathan, X. Lin, H.-L. M ¨a¨att¨anen, J. Sedin, Z. Zou, W. A. Hapsari, and S. Yasukawa, “An overview of 3GPP release-15 study on enhanced LTE support for connected drones,”IEEE Commun. Standards Mag., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 140–146, 2022

    2022

  16. [23]

    Three-dimensional object recognition,

    P. J. Besl and R. C. Jain, “Three-dimensional object recognition,”ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 75–145, 1985

    1985

  17. [24]

    Vision-based odometry and SLAM for medium and high altitude flying UA Vs,

    F. Caballero, L. Merino, J. Ferruz, and A. Ollero, “Vision-based odometry and SLAM for medium and high altitude flying UA Vs,”J. Intell. Rob. Sys., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 137–161, 2009

    2009

  18. [25]

    Reinforcement learning in multiple- UA V networks: Deployment and movement design,

    X. Liu, Y . Liu, and Y . Chen, “Reinforcement learning in multiple- UA V networks: Deployment and movement design,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 8036–8049, 2019

    2019

  19. [26]

    UA Vs meet agentic AI: A multidomain survey of autonomous aerial intelligence and agentic uavs,

    R. Sapkota, K. I. Roumeliotis, and M. Karkee, “UA Vs meet agentic AI: A multidomain survey of autonomous aerial intelligence and agentic uavs,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.08045, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  20. [27]

    A novel actuation concept for a multi-rotor UA V,

    P. Segui-Gasco, Y . Al-Rihani, H.-S. Shin, and A. Savvaris, “A novel actuation concept for a multi-rotor UA V,”J. Intell. Rob. Sys., vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 173–191, 2014

    2014

  21. [28]

    A survey on aerial swarm robotics,

    S.-J. Chung, A. A. Paranjape, P. Dames, S. Shen, and V . Kumar, “A survey on aerial swarm robotics,”IEEE Trans. Rob., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 837–855, 2018

    2018

  22. [29]

    A robust h∞ controller for an UA V flight control system,

    J. L ´opez, R. Dormido, S. Dormido, and J. G ´omez, “A robust h∞ controller for an UA V flight control system,”The Sci. World J., vol. 2015, no. 1, p. 403236, 2015

    2015

  23. [30]

    Drone remote sensing for forestry research and practices,

    L. Tang and G. Shao, “Drone remote sensing for forestry research and practices,”J. Forestry Res., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 791–797, 2015

    2015

  24. [31]

    UA V detection and localization based on multi-dimensional signal features,

    W. Nie, Z.-C. Han, Y . Li, W. He, L.-B. Xie, X.-L. Yang, and M. Zhou, “UA V detection and localization based on multi-dimensional signal features,”IEEE Sensors J., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 5150–5162, 2021

    2021

  25. [32]

    Target perception and digital reconstruction for low altitude economy based on multi-radar data fusion,

    S. Hou, C. Zhu, Z. Yang, F. Liu, C. Huang, and Z. Zhang, “Target perception and digital reconstruction for low altitude economy based on multi-radar data fusion,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. Workshops. IEEE, 2025, pp. 732–738

    2025

  26. [33]

    Flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs): A survey,

    ˙I. Bekmezci, ¨O. K. S ¸ahing¨oz, and S ¸. Temel, “Flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs): A survey,”Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1254–1270, Mar. 2013

    2013

  27. [34]

    Reinforcement learning in flying ad-hoc networks: A survey,

    S. Rezwan, S. Raza, E. Gregori, and V . Barni, “Reinforcement learning in flying ad-hoc networks: A survey,”Electronics, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 419, Mar. 2021

    2021

  28. [35]

    A systematic literature review of flying ad hoc networks: State-of-the- art, challenges, and perspectives,

    M. Pasandideh-Sharif, B. Bejarbaneh, S. M. Razavizadeh, and et al., “A systematic literature review of flying ad hoc networks: State-of-the- art, challenges, and perspectives,”J. Field Robotics, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 955–979, Apr. 2023

    2023

  29. [36]

    Unmanned aerial vehicles in agriculture: A review of perspective of platform, control, and applications,

    J. Kim, S. Kim, C. Ju, and H. I. Son, “Unmanned aerial vehicles in agriculture: A review of perspective of platform, control, and applications,”Ieee Access, vol. 7, pp. 105 100–105 115, 2019

    2019

  30. [37]

    Review on the technological development and application of UA V systems,

    B. Fan, Y . Li, R. Zhang, and Q. Fu, “Review on the technological development and application of UA V systems,”Chinese Journal of Electronics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 199–207, Feb. 2020

    2020

  31. [38]

    A survey on swarming with micro air vehicles: Fundamental challenges and constraints,

    M. Coppola, K. N. McGuire, C. De Wagter, and G. C. De Croon, “A survey on swarming with micro air vehicles: Fundamental challenges and constraints,”Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 7, p. 18, Apr. 2020

    2020

  32. [39]

    Control schemes for quadrotor UA V: taxonomy and survey,

    A. Khalid, Z. Mushtaq, S. Arif, K. Zeb, M. A. Khan, and S. Bakshi, “Control schemes for quadrotor UA V: taxonomy and survey,”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1–32, May 2023

    2023

  33. [40]

    Past, present, and future of aerial robotic manipulators,

    A. Ollero, M. Tognon, A. Suarez, D. Lee, and A. Franchi, “Past, present, and future of aerial robotic manipulators,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 626–645, Jan. 2022

    2022

  34. [41]

    Current status, challenges, and prospects for new types of aerial robots,

    X. Zhou, H. Zhong, H. Zhang, W. He, H. Hua, and Y . Wang, “Current status, challenges, and prospects for new types of aerial robots,” Engineering, vol. 41, pp. 19–34, 2024

    2024

  35. [42]

    A review of UA V autonomous navigation in GPS-denied environments,

    Y . Chang, Y . Cheng, U. Manzoor, and J. Murray, “A review of UA V autonomous navigation in GPS-denied environments,”Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 170, p. 104533, Sep. 2023

    2023

  36. [43]

    Survey of simulators for aerial robots: An overview and in-depth systematic comparisons [survey],

    C. A. Dimmig, G. Silano, K. McGuire, C. Gabellieri, W. H ¨onig, J. Moore, and M. Kobilarov, “Survey of simulators for aerial robots: An overview and in-depth systematic comparisons [survey],”IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 153–166, Feb. 2024

    2024

  37. [44]

    A survey on the unmanned aircraft system traffic management (utm),

    A. Hamissi, A. Dhraief, A. Belghith, and L. Saidane, “A survey on the unmanned aircraft system traffic management (utm),”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 1–37, Mar. 2023

    2023

  38. [45]

    Urban air mobility communications and networking: Recent advances, techniques, and challenges,

    M. U. Arafat and S. Moh, “Urban air mobility communications and networking: Recent advances, techniques, and challenges,”Drones, vol. 8, no. 12, Aug. 2024

    2024

  39. [46]

    A review of global and regional frameworks for the integration of an unmanned aircraft system in air traffic management,

    P. Aposporis, “A review of global and regional frameworks for the integration of an unmanned aircraft system in air traffic management,” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, vol. 24, p. 101064, 2024

    2024

  40. [47]

    A critical review of information provision for U-space traffic autonomous guidance,

    I. Panov and A. Ul Haq, “A critical review of information provision for U-space traffic autonomous guidance,”Aerospace, vol. 11, no. 6, p. 471, Jun. 2024

    2024

  41. [48]

    Survey on computer vision for UA Vs: Current developments and trends,

    C. Kanellakis and G. Nikolakopoulos, “Survey on computer vision for UA Vs: Current developments and trends,”Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 141–168, 2017

    2017

  42. [49]

    A compre- hensive survey on artificial intelligence for unmanned aerial vehicles,

    S. Sai, A. Garg, K. Jhawar, V . Chamola, and B. Sikdar, “A compre- hensive survey on artificial intelligence for unmanned aerial vehicles,” IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology, vol. 4, pp. 713–738, 2023

    2023

  43. [50]

    Ai for UA V-assisted IoT applications: A comprehensive review,

    N. Cheng, S. Wu, X. Wang, Z. Yin, C. Li, W. Chen, and F. Chen, “Ai for UA V-assisted IoT applications: A comprehensive review,”IEEE Internet of Things J., vol. 10, no. 16, pp. 14 438–14 461, Aug. 2023

    2023

  44. [51]

    A survey on UA V control with multi-agent reinforcement learning,

    C. C. Ekechi, T. Elfouly, A. Alouani, and T. Khattab, “A survey on UA V control with multi-agent reinforcement learning,”Drones, vol. 9, no. 7, p. 484, Jul. 2025

    2025

  45. [52]

    Survey on UA V cellular communications: Practical aspects, standardization advancements, regulation, and secu- rity challenges,

    A. Fotouhi, H. Qiang, M. Ding, M. Hassan, S. Giordano, ´A. Garc´ıa- Rodr´ıguez, and J. Yuan, “Survey on UA V cellular communications: Practical aspects, standardization advancements, regulation, and secu- rity challenges,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 4...

    2019

  46. [53]

    What will the future of UA V cellular communications be? a flight from 5G to 6G,

    G. Geraci, A. Zappone, M. Kountouris, D. L ´opez-P´erez, N. Gonz ´alez- Prelcic, S. M. Azimi-Abarghouyi, S. Peters, M. Giordani, D. G ¨und¨uz, A. Shojaeifard, and P. Popovski, “What will the future of UA V cellular communications be? a flight from 5G to 6G,”IEEE Communications...

    2022

  47. [54]

    A survey of security in UA Vs and FANETs: Issues, threats, analysis of attacks, and solutions,

    O. Ceviz, S. Sen, and P. Sadioglu, “A survey of security in UA Vs and FANETs: Issues, threats, analysis of attacks, and solutions,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2024

    2024

  48. [55]

    Unmanned aerial systems for photogram- metry and remote sensing: A review,

    I. Colomina and P. Molina, “Unmanned aerial systems for photogram- metry and remote sensing: A review,”ISPRS Journal of photogramme- try and remote sensing, vol. 92, pp. 79–97, 2014

    2014

  49. [56]

    Review on application of drone systems in precision agriculture,

    U. R. Mogili and B. Deepak, “Review on application of drone systems in precision agriculture,”Procedia computer science, vol. 133, pp. 502– 509, 2018

    2018

  50. [57]

    Unmanned aerial vehicles for search and rescue: A survey,

    M. Lyu, Y . Zhao, C. Huang, and H. Huang, “Unmanned aerial vehicles for search and rescue: A survey,”Remote Sensing, vol. 15, no. 13, p. 3266, 2023

    2023

  51. [58]

    Unmanned aerial geophysical remote sensing: a systematic review,

    F. Dadrass Javan, F. Samadzadegan, A. Toosi, and M. van der Meijde, “Unmanned aerial geophysical remote sensing: a systematic review,” Remote Sensing, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 110, Jan. 2024. 30

    2024

  52. [59]

    Accessing from the sky: A tutorial on UA V communications for 5G and beyond,

    Y . Zeng, Q. Wu, and R. Zhang, “Accessing from the sky: A tutorial on UA V communications for 5G and beyond,”Proc. IEEE, vol. 107, no. 12, pp. 2327–2375, Dec. 2019

    2019

  53. [60]

    A survey of air-to-ground propagation channel modeling for unmanned aerial vehicles,

    W. Khawaja, I. Guvenc, D. W. Matolak, U.-C. Fiebig, and N. Schneck- enberger, “A survey of air-to-ground propagation channel modeling for unmanned aerial vehicles,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 2361–2391, Sep. 2019

    2019

  54. [61]

    A survey on UA V-aided maritime communications: Deployment considerations, applications, and future challenges,

    N. Nomikos, P. K. Gkonis, P. S. Bithas, and P. Trakadas, “A survey on UA V-aided maritime communications: Deployment considerations, applications, and future challenges,”IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc., volume=4, pages=56–78, year=Sep. 2022, publisher=IEEE

    2022

  55. [62]

    A tutorial on environment-aware communica- tions via channel knowledge map for 6G,

    Y . Zeng, J. Chen, J. Xu, D. Wu, X. Xu, S. Jin, X. Gao, D. Gesbert, S. Cui, and R. Zhang, “A tutorial on environment-aware communica- tions via channel knowledge map for 6G,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tut., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1478–1519, Sep. 2024

    2024

  56. [63]

    5g nr evolution: Release 16 and 17 overview,

    M. Berg, E. Dahlmanet al., “5g nr evolution: Release 16 and 17 overview,”Ericsson Technology Review, Mar. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.ericsson.com/en/reports-and-papers/ ericsson-technology-review/articles/5g-nr-evolution

    2020

  57. [64]

    Non-terrestrial networks (ntn) in 3gpp,

    3GPP, “Non-terrestrial networks (ntn) in 3gpp,” https://www.3gpp.org/ technologies/ntn-overview, 2024

    2024

  58. [65]

    Service requirements for cyber-physical control applications in vertical domains (release 18),

    ——, “Service requirements for cyber-physical control applications in vertical domains (release 18),” Tech. Rep. TR 22.125 V18.0.0, March 2024. [66]IEEE Standard for Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications Amendment: Enhancements for Nex...

    2024

  59. [69]

    Enhanced lte support for aerial vehicles,

    3GPP, “Enhanced lte support for aerial vehicles,” 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Tech. Rep. TR 36.777, 2017, release 15. [Online]. Available: https://www.3gpp.org/dynareport/36777.htm

    2017

  60. [70]

    Ai/ml management for 5g systems (ts 28.105, rel-18),

    ——, “Ai/ml management for 5g systems (ts 28.105, rel-18),” https: //www.3gpp.org/technologies/ai-ml-management, 2023

    2023

  61. [71]

    5g nr for uavs: Field trial results,

    Qualcomm, “5g nr for uavs: Field trial results,” https: //www.qualcomm.com/content/dam/qcomm-martech/dm-assets/ documents/5G NR for UA VsField Trial Results.pdf, 2024

    2024

  62. [72]

    Aeromacs: An ieee 802.16 standard-based technology for the next generation of air transportation systems,

    B. Kamali, “Aeromacs: An ieee 802.16 standard-based technology for the next generation of air transportation systems,” 2018

    2018

  63. [73]

    Orthogonal time-frequency space modulation: A promising next-generation waveform,

    Z. Wei, W. Yuan, S. Li, J. Yuan, G. Bharatula, R. Hadani, and L. Hanzo, “Orthogonal time-frequency space modulation: A promising next-generation waveform,”IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 136–144, 2021

    2021

  64. [74]

    New delay doppler communication paradigm in 6G era: A survey of orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS),

    W. Yuan, S. Li, Z. Wei, Y . Cui, J. Jiang, H. Zhang, and P. Fan, “New delay doppler communication paradigm in 6G era: A survey of orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS),”China Commun., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1–25, 2023

    2023

  65. [75]

    AFDM: A full diversity next generation waveform for high mobility communications,

    A. Bemani, N. Ksairi, and M. Kountouris, “AFDM: A full diversity next generation waveform for high mobility communications,” inProc. 2021 IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. Workshops. IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–6

    2021

  66. [76]

    Factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm,

    F. R. Kschischang, B. J. Frey, and H.-A. Loeliger, “Factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm,”IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 498–519, 2002

    2002

  67. [77]

    Gaussian message passing for overloaded massive MIMO-NOMA,

    L. Liu, C. Yuen, Y . L. Guan, Y . Li, and C. Huang, “Gaussian message passing for overloaded massive MIMO-NOMA,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 210–226, 2018

    2018

  68. [78]

    Expectation propagation detection for high-order high-dimensional MIMO systems,

    J. Cespedes, P. M. Olmos, M. S ´anchez-Fern´andez, and F. Perez-Cruz, “Expectation propagation detection for high-order high-dimensional MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 2840– 2849, 2014

    2014

  69. [79]

    A GAMP-based low complexity sparse bayesian learning algorithm,

    M. Al-Shoukairi, P. Schniter, and B. D. Rao, “A GAMP-based low complexity sparse bayesian learning algorithm,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 294–308, 2017

    2017

  70. [80]

    Vector approximate message passing,

    S. Rangan, P. Schniter, and A. K. Fletcher, “Vector approximate message passing,”IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 6664– 6684, 2019

    2019

  71. [81]

    Iterative detection for orthogonal time frequency space modulation with uni- tary approximate message passing,

    Z. Yuan, F. Liu, W. Yuan, Q. Guo, Z. Wang, and J. Yuan, “Iterative detection for orthogonal time frequency space modulation with uni- tary approximate message passing,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 714–725, 2021

    2021

  72. [82]

    Hybrid MAP and PIC detection for OTFS modulation,

    S. Li, W. Yuan, Z. Wei, J. Yuan, B. Bai, D. W. K. Ng, and Y . Xie, “Hybrid MAP and PIC detection for OTFS modulation,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 7193–7198, 2021

    2021

  73. [83]

    On hybrid detection of wireless communications over interference channels: A generalized framework,

    W. Yuan, S. Li, Z. Wei, Y . Li, and P. Fan, “On hybrid detection of wireless communications over interference channels: A generalized framework,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1214– 1229, 2025

    2025

  74. [84]

    Wireless localization and formation control with asynchronous agents,

    W. Yuan, Z. Yang, L. Chen, R. Zhang, Y . Yao, Y . Cui, H. Zhang, and D. W. K. Ng, “Wireless localization and formation control with asynchronous agents,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 2890–2904, 2024

    2024

  75. [85]

    Particle filtering,

    P. M. Djuric, J. H. Kotecha, J. Zhang, Y . Huang, T. Ghirmai, M. F. Bugallo, and J. Miguez, “Particle filtering,”IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 19–38, 2003

    2003

  76. [86]

    Multiple hypothesis tracking for multiple target tracking,

    S. S. Blackman, “Multiple hypothesis tracking for multiple target tracking,”IEEE Aero. Elec. Sys. Mag., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2004

    2004

  77. [87]

    Bayesian filtering with random finite set observations,

    B.-T. V o, B.-N. V o, and A. Cantoni, “Bayesian filtering with random finite set observations,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Process., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1313–1326, 2008

    2008

  78. [88]

    Toward dual-functional LAWN: Control-aware system design for aerodynamics-aided UA V formations,

    J. Wu, W. Yuan, Q. Cheng, and H. Jin, “Toward dual-functional LAWN: Control-aware system design for aerodynamics-aided UA V formations,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 2025, early access, doi:10.1109/JSAC.2025.3608746

    2025

  79. [89]

    Full-duplex communication for isac: Joint beamforming and power optimization,

    Z. He, W. Xu, H. Shen, D. W. K. Ng, Y . C. Eldar, and X. You, “Full-duplex communication for isac: Joint beamforming and power optimization,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 2920–2936, 2023

    2023

  80. [90]

    An iteratively weighted mmse approach to distributed sum-utility maximization for a mimo in- terfering broadcast channel,

    Q. Shi, M. Razaviyayn, Z.-Q. Luo, and C. He, “An iteratively weighted mmse approach to distributed sum-utility maximization for a mimo in- terfering broadcast channel,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 4331–4340, 2011

    2011

  81. [91]

    Fractional programming for communication systems—part i: Power control and beamforming,

    K. Shen and W. Yu, “Fractional programming for communication systems—part i: Power control and beamforming,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 2616–2630, 2018

    2018

  82. [92]

    Control over noisy channels,

    S. Tatikonda and S. Mitter, “Control over noisy channels,”IEEE transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1196–1201, 2004

    2004

  83. [93]

    Rate-splitting multiple access: Fundamentals, survey, and future research trends,

    Y . Mao, O. Dizdar, B. Clerckx, R. Schober, P. Popovski, and H. V . Poor, “Rate-splitting multiple access: Fundamentals, survey, and future research trends,”IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2073–2126, 2022

    2022

  84. [94]

    Rate-cost tradeoffs in control,

    V . Kostina and B. Hassibi, “Rate-cost tradeoffs in control,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 4525–4540, 2019

    2019

  85. [95]

    Mpc-based path tracking and power allocation for wncs: An outage probability perspective,

    H. Jin, J. Wu, and W. Yuan, “Mpc-based path tracking and power allocation for wncs: An outage probability perspective,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2025

    2025

  86. [96]

    Downlink optimization with interference pricing and statistical csi,

    T. A. Le and M. R. Nakhai, “Downlink optimization with interference pricing and statistical csi,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 2339–2349, 2013

    2013

  87. [97]

    Robust cognitive beamform- ing with bounded channel uncertainties,

    G. Zheng, K.-K. Wong, and B. Ottersten, “Robust cognitive beamform- ing with bounded channel uncertainties,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 4871–4881, 2009

    2009

  88. [98]

    SAGIN-oriented covert communications: Joint robust beamforming and coverage opti- mization,

    N. Wu, J. Wu, W. Yuan, R. Chong, and M. Matthaiou, “SAGIN-oriented covert communications: Joint robust beamforming and coverage opti- mization,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2025

    2025

  89. [99]

    Probabilistic sinr constrained robust transmit beamforming: A bernstein-type inequality based conservative approach,

    K.-Y . Wang, T.-H. Chang, W.-K. Ma, A. M.-C. So, and C.-Y . Chi, “Probabilistic sinr constrained robust transmit beamforming: A bernstein-type inequality based conservative approach,” in2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEE...

    2011

  90. [100]

    On the robustness of transmit beamforming,

    J. Wang and M. Payar ´o, “On the robustness of transmit beamforming,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 5933– 5938, 2010

    2010

  91. [101]

    Communication-assisted sensing in 6g networks,

    F. Dong, F. Liu, S. Lu, Y . Xiong, Q. Zhang, Z. Feng, and F. Gao, “Communication-assisted sensing in 6g networks,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2025

    2025

  92. [102]

    Energy-efficient uav communication with tra- jectory optimization,

    Y . Zeng and R. Zhang, “Energy-efficient uav communication with tra- jectory optimization,”IEEE Transactions on wireless communications, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 3747–3760, 2017

    2017

  93. [103]

    Resource allocation for simultaneous wireless information and power transfer systems: A tutorial overview,

    Z. Wei, X. Yu, D. W. K. Ng, and R. Schober, “Resource allocation for simultaneous wireless information and power transfer systems: A tutorial overview,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 127– 149, 2021

    2021

  94. [104]

    Perception and navigation in autonomous systems in the era of learning: A survey,

    Y . Tang, C. Zhao, J. Wang, C. Zhang, Q. Sun, W. X. Zheng, W. Du, F. Qian, and J. Kurths, “Perception and navigation in autonomous systems in the era of learning: A survey,”IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 9604–9624, 2023. 31

    2023

  95. [105]

    MPFusionNet: Transformer-based multi-modal percep- tion fusion for predictive beamforming in low-altitude UA V com- munication networks,

    Y . Xie, Y . Gong, Y . Zhao, M. Zhou, S. Wang, D. Zhang, Y . Wang, and J. Wang, “MPFusionNet: Transformer-based multi-modal percep- tion fusion for predictive beamforming in low-altitude UA V com- munication networks,”IEEE Internet Things J., 2025, early access, doi:10.1109/JI...

    2025

  96. [106]

    Research on autonomous navigation algorithm of quadrotor UA V based on CNN,

    M. Ma, P. Mao, Z. Chen, Z. Miao, and J. Liu, “Research on autonomous navigation algorithm of quadrotor UA V based on CNN,” inProc. IEEE CCSB, 2025, pp. 103–110

    2025

  97. [107]

    Spectralmamba: Ef- ficient mamba for hyperspectral image classification,

    J. Yao, D. Hong, C. Li, and J. Chanussot, “Spectralmamba: Ef- ficient mamba for hyperspectral image classification,”CoRR, vol. abs/2404.08489, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  98. [108]

    DRL- driven optimization for energy efficiency and fairness in NOMA-UA V networks,

    B. I. Ghomri, M. Y . Bendimerad, and F. T. Bendimerad, “DRL- driven optimization for energy efficiency and fairness in NOMA-UA V networks,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1048–1052, 2024

    2024

  99. [109]

    Fairness-based 3-D multi- UA V trajectory optimization in multi-uav-assisted MEC system,

    Y . He, Y . Gan, H. Cui, and M. Guizani, “Fairness-based 3-D multi- UA V trajectory optimization in multi-uav-assisted MEC system,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 10, no. 13, pp. 11 383–11 395, 2023

    2023

  100. [110]

    Truncated quantile critics algorithm for cryptocurrency portfolio op- timization,

    L. Xiao, X. Wei, Y . Xu, X. Xu, K. Gong, H. Li, and F. Zhang, “Truncated quantile critics algorithm for cryptocurrency portfolio op- timization,” inProc. IEEE SMC, 2023, pp. 2208–2213

    2023

  101. [111]

    On spectral unmixing resolution using extended support vector machines,

    X. Li, X. Jia, L. Wang, and K. Zhao, “On spectral unmixing resolution using extended support vector machines,”IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 4985–4996, 2015

    2015

  102. [112]

    DTF-VPP: A dynamic intrusion detection method combining transformer and feature filtering for virtual power plant network security,

    H. Zhao, D. Li, J. Sun, X. Li, H. Tang, and G. Huang, “DTF-VPP: A dynamic intrusion detection method combining transformer and feature filtering for virtual power plant network security,”IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur., vol. 20, pp. 11 080–11 092, 2025

    2025

  103. [113]

    Generative AI for advanced UA V networking,

    G. Sun, W. Xie, D. Niyato, H. Du, J. Kang, J. Wu, S. Sun, and P. Zhang, “Generative AI for advanced UA V networking,”IEEE Netw., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 244–253, 2025

    2025

  104. [114]

    Predictive control over LAWN: Joint trajectory design and resource allocation,

    H. Jin, J. Wu, W. Yuan, R. Ruan, J. Wang, D. Niyato, D. I. Kim, and A. Jamalipour, “Predictive control over LAWN: Joint trajectory design and resource allocation,”CoRR, 2025

    2025

  105. [115]

    Generative neural network channel modeling for millimeter-wave UA V communication,

    W. Xia, S. Rangan, M. Mezzavilla, A. Lozano, G. Geraci, V . Semkin, and G. Loianno, “Generative neural network channel modeling for millimeter-wave UA V communication,”IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 9417–9431, 2022

    2022

  106. [116]

    Distributed condi- tional generative adversarial networks (gans) for data-driven millimeter wave communications in UA V networks,

    Q. Zhang, A. Ferdowsi, W. Saad, and M. Bennis, “Distributed condi- tional generative adversarial networks (gans) for data-driven millimeter wave communications in UA V networks,”IEEE Trans. Wirel. Com- mun., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1438–1452, 2022

    2022

  107. [117]

    Uncertainty, edge, and reverse- attention guided generative adversarial network for automatic building detection in remotely sensed images,

    S. Chattopadhyay and A. C. Kak, “Uncertainty, edge, and reverse- attention guided generative adversarial network for automatic building detection in remotely sensed images,”IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote. Sens., vol. 15, pp. 3146–3167, 2022

    2022

  108. [118]

    A probabilistic optimal UA V trajectory planning approach to minimise the uncertainty of traffic density estimations,

    Y . Englezou, S. Timotheou, and C. G. Panayiotou, “A probabilistic optimal UA V trajectory planning approach to minimise the uncertainty of traffic density estimations,” inProc. IEEE ITSC, 2024, pp. 4250– 4255

    2024

  109. [119]

    Uncertainty- aware multi-agent reinforcement learning for anti-interference trajec- tory planning of cellular-connected UA Vs,

    Q. Zhou, W. Mao, J. Nakazato, Y . Ji, and M. Tsukada, “Uncertainty- aware multi-agent reinforcement learning for anti-interference trajec- tory planning of cellular-connected UA Vs,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2025, early access, doi:10.1109/TVT.2025.3606201

    2025

  110. [120]

    UA V trajectory planning for AoI-minimal data collection in UA V-aided IoT networks by transformer,

    B. Zhu, E. Bedeer, H. H. Nguyen, R. Barton, and Z. Gao, “UA V trajectory planning for AoI-minimal data collection in UA V-aided IoT networks by transformer,”IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 22, pp. 1343–1358, 2023

    2023

  111. [121]

    Diffusion- based reinforcement learning for cooperative offloading and resource allocation in multi-UA V assisted edge-enabled metaverse,

    Z. Zhang, J. Wang, J. Chen, H. Fu, Z. Tong, and C. Jiang, “Diffusion- based reinforcement learning for cooperative offloading and resource allocation in multi-UA V assisted edge-enabled metaverse,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 74, pp. 11 281–11 293, 2025

    2025

  112. [122]

    Cloud removal method for single-point-of-view optical satellite images in tidal flat environ- ment using guided sampling of DDPM,

    L. Donguk, J. Hyeong-Tae, and R. Joo-Hyung, “Cloud removal method for single-point-of-view optical satellite images in tidal flat environ- ment using guided sampling of DDPM,”IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 63, pp. 1–14, 2025

    2025

  113. [123]

    DAWN: dynamic task planning of multi-UA V with two-layer optimization mechanism in uncertain environments,

    D. Liu, B. Fei, W. Bao, X. Zhu, and X. Li, “DAWN: dynamic task planning of multi-UA V with two-layer optimization mechanism in uncertain environments,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 11, no. 23, pp. 37 813–37 830, 2024

    2024

  114. [124]

    Sitatlas: an ai-enhanced geospatial navigation system for smart campus environments,

    H. K. M. Krishnan and H. Guo, “Sitatlas: an ai-enhanced geospatial navigation system for smart campus environments,” inProc. IEEE ISC2, 2024, pp. 1–5

    2024

  115. [125]

    Learning minimum-time flight for fixed-wing UA Vs with high-fidelity dynamics,

    G. Wang, R. Feng, X. Wang, and Z. Liu, “Learning minimum-time flight for fixed-wing UA Vs with high-fidelity dynamics,” inProc. IEEE YAC, 2025, pp. 292–298

    2025

  116. [126]

    Single- and multiagent actor-critic for initial UA V’s deployment and 3-D trajectory design,

    M. Nasr-Azadani, J. Abouei, and K. N. Plataniotis, “Single- and multiagent actor-critic for initial UA V’s deployment and 3-D trajectory design,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 9, no. 16, pp. 15 372–15 389, 2022

    2022

  117. [127]

    Vision-based hierarchical reinforcement learning for quadrotor UA V navigation,

    Q. Sun, J. Ji, J. Mu, J. Xu, L. Kocarev, J. Kurths, and Y . Tang, “Vision-based hierarchical reinforcement learning for quadrotor UA V navigation,”IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 2025, early access, doi:10.1109/TMECH.2025.3596019

    2025

  118. [128]

    Offline and distributional reinforcement learning for wireless communications,

    E. Eldeeb and H. Alves, “Offline and distributional reinforcement learning for wireless communications,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 71–76, 2025

    2025

  119. [129]

    Joint optimization of UA V-carried IRS for urban low altitude mmwave communications with deep reinforcement learning,

    W. Xie, G. Sun, B. Liu, J. Li, J. Wang, H. Du, D. Niyato, and D. I. Kim, “Joint optimization of UA V-carried IRS for urban low altitude mmwave communications with deep reinforcement learning,”CoRR, vol. abs/2501.02787, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  120. [130]

    Consensus-based control for unmanned aerial vehicle formation with speed adaptability,

    H. Zhang, Y . Li, and G. Xu, “Consensus-based control for unmanned aerial vehicle formation with speed adaptability,” inProc. IEEE CCDC, 2018, pp. 6106–6111

    2018

  121. [131]

    Coverage control for UA V swarm communication networks: A distributed learning approach,

    N. Gao, L. Liang, D. Cai, X. Li, and S. Jin, “Coverage control for UA V swarm communication networks: A distributed learning approach,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 9, no. 20, pp. 19 854–19 867, 2022

    2022

  122. [132]

    Collision-avoiding flocking with multiple fixed-wing UA Vs in obstacle-cluttered environments: A task-specific curriculum- based MADRL approach,

    C. Yan, C. Wang, X. Xiang, K. H. Low, X. Wang, X. Xu, and L. Shen, “Collision-avoiding flocking with multiple fixed-wing UA Vs in obstacle-cluttered environments: A task-specific curriculum- based MADRL approach,”IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 10...

    2024

  123. [133]

    Generative AI-driven multiagent DRL for task allocation in UA V- assisted EMPD within 6G-enabled SAGIN networks,

    M. L. Betalo, I. Ullah, F. B. Tesema, Z. Wu, J. Li, and X. Bai, “Generative AI-driven multiagent DRL for task allocation in UA V- assisted EMPD within 6G-enabled SAGIN networks,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 12, no. 17, pp. 35 890–35 907, 2025

    2025

  124. [134]

    AI-driven UA V-NOMA-MEC in next generation wireless networks,

    Z. Yang, M. Chen, X. Liu, Y . Liu, Y . Chen, S. Cui, and H. V . Poor, “AI-driven UA V-NOMA-MEC in next generation wireless networks,” IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 66–73, 2021

    2021

  125. [135]

    Vehicle-mounted multi-UA V cooperative collection and scheduling mechanism for multi- source heterogeneous tasks,

    J. Yan, M. Guo, J. Liu, J. Deng, and H. Yuan, “Vehicle-mounted multi-UA V cooperative collection and scheduling mechanism for multi- source heterogeneous tasks,”IEEE Internet Things J., 2025, early access, doi:10.1109/JIOT.2025.3627329

    2025

  126. [136]

    Joint task offloading and resource allocation in aerial-terrestrial UA V networks with edge and fog computing for post-disaster rescue,

    G. Sun, L. He, Z. Sun, Q. Wu, S. Liang, J. Li, D. Niyato, and V . C. M. Leung, “Joint task offloading and resource allocation in aerial-terrestrial UA V networks with edge and fog computing for post-disaster rescue,” IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 8582–8600, 2024

    2024

  127. [137]

    Efficient and secure aggregation framework for federated-learning- based spectrum sharing,

    W. Li, G. Chen, X. Zhang, N. Wang, D. Ouyang, and C. Chen, “Efficient and secure aggregation framework for federated-learning- based spectrum sharing,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 17 223–17 236, 2024

    2024

  128. [138]

    Robust AI-assisted successive interference cancellation for coexistence of RF sensors and 5G signals in shared spectrum,

    H. Mohammadi, F. Faisal, and V . Marojevic, “Robust AI-assisted successive interference cancellation for coexistence of RF sensors and 5G signals in shared spectrum,” inProc. IEEE DySPAN, 2025, pp. 1–8

    2025

  129. [139]

    Joint speed control and energy replenishment opti- mization for UA V-assisted IoT data collection with deep reinforcement transfer learning,

    N. H. Chu, D. T. Hoang, D. N. Nguyen, N. V . Huynh, and E. Dutkiewicz, “Joint speed control and energy replenishment opti- mization for UA V-assisted IoT data collection with deep reinforcement transfer learning,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 5778– 5793, 2023

    2023

  130. [140]

    Time and energy minimization communications based on collaborative beamforming for UA V networks: A multi-objective optimization method,

    G. Sun, J. Li, Y . Liu, S. Liang, and H. Kang, “Time and energy minimization communications based on collaborative beamforming for UA V networks: A multi-objective optimization method,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 3555–3572, 2021

    2021

  131. [141]

    Joint UA V trajectory planning, DAG task scheduling, and service function deployment based on DRL in UA V-empowered edge computing,

    X. Wei, L. Cai, N. Wei, P. Zou, J. Zhang, and S. Subramaniam, “Joint UA V trajectory planning, DAG task scheduling, and service function deployment based on DRL in UA V-empowered edge computing,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 10, no. 14, pp. 12 826–12 838, 2023

    2023

  132. [142]

    MADRL-based multi- UA V 3D trajectory planning for 6G-oriented communication as- sistance,

    T. Yu, F. Cao, X. Wang, and J. Hu, “MADRL-based multi- UA V 3D trajectory planning for 6G-oriented communication as- sistance,”IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2025, early access, doi:10.1109/TITS.2025.3620891

    2025

  133. [143]

    UA V application with XAI and soft computing methods to protect privacy of power-data in smart grids,

    Y . Gan, Z. Xiao, T. Ke, and Z. Liang, “UA V application with XAI and soft computing methods to protect privacy of power-data in smart grids,”IEEE Trans. Consumer Electron., vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 3921–3929, 2025

    2025

  134. [144]

    Secure offloading with adversarial multi-agent reinforcement learning against intelligent eavesdroppers in UA V-enabled mobile edge computing,

    X. Li, W. Huangfu, X. Xu, J. Huo, and K. Long, “Secure offloading with adversarial multi-agent reinforcement learning against intelligent eavesdroppers in UA V-enabled mobile edge computing,”IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 13 914–13 928, 2024

    2024

  135. [145]

    Wireless security and IoT device identification using RF fingerprinting and deep learning,

    N. Quadar, A. Chehri, and B. Debaque, “Wireless security and IoT device identification using RF fingerprinting and deep learning,” in Proc. IEEE VTC, 2024, pp. 1–5

    2024

  136. [146]

    Hypercube graph self-attention mechanisms for intelligent vehicular 32 intrusion detection in autonomous transport systems,

    L. Lin, X. Wang, X. Zhu, Y . Huang, D. Fang, and M. J. Piran, “Hypercube graph self-attention mechanisms for intelligent vehicular 32 intrusion detection in autonomous transport systems,”IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 17 967–17 980, 2025

    2025

  137. [147]

    A privacy-aware approach for managing the energy of cloud-based IoT resources using an improved optimization algorithm,

    Y . Chen, S. Hao, and H. Nazif, “A privacy-aware approach for managing the energy of cloud-based IoT resources using an improved optimization algorithm,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 7362–7374, 2022

    2022

  138. [148]

    Sociodiff: A socio-aware diffusion model for residential electricity consumption data generation,

    W. Chen, X. Liu, X. Zhang, J. Shi, H. Yang, Z. Han, and Y . Zhang, “Sociodiff: A socio-aware diffusion model for residential electricity consumption data generation,”IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 3786–3800, 2025

    2025

  139. [149]

    Long-range ship detection system: Enhancing accuracy with generative AI and data augmentation,

    G.-R. Chang, C.-A. Chan, S.-F. Lin, and C.-Y . Lin, “Long-range ship detection system: Enhancing accuracy with generative AI and data augmentation,” inProc. IEEE ICCE-Taiwan, 2025, pp. 505–506

    2025

  140. [150]

    Super- resolution of satellite lidars for forest studies using diffusion generative models,

    A. Ramirez–Jaime, G. R. Arce, M. Stephen, and J. MacKinnon, “Super- resolution of satellite lidars for forest studies using diffusion generative models,” inProc. IEEE CISA, 2024, pp. 01–05

    2024

  141. [151]

    Conditional denoising diffusion probabilistic models for data reconstruction enhancement in wireless communications,

    M. Letafati, S. Ali, and M. Latva-Aho, “Conditional denoising diffusion probabilistic models for data reconstruction enhancement in wireless communications,”IEEE Trans. Mach. Learn. Commun. Netw., vol. 3, pp. 133–146, 2025

    2025

  142. [152]

    Toward multi-task gener- alization in autonomous navigation: A human-in-the-loop adversarial reinforcement learning with diffusion policy,

    D. Hu, C. Huang, J. Wu, and X. Yuan, “Toward multi-task gener- alization in autonomous navigation: A human-in-the-loop adversarial reinforcement learning with diffusion policy,”IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2025, early access, doi:10.1109/tits.2025.3591239

    2025

  143. [153]

    Probabilistic fine-grained urban flow inference with normalizing flows,

    T. Zhong, H. Yu, R. Li, X. Xu, X. Luo, and F. Zhou, “Probabilistic fine-grained urban flow inference with normalizing flows,” inProc. IEEE ICASSP, 2022, pp. 3663–3667

    2022

  144. [154]

    Multi-UA V cooperative pursuit strategy with limited visual field in urban airspace: A multi-agent reinforcement learning approach,

    Z. Peng, G. Wu, B. Luo, and L. Wang, “Multi-UA V cooperative pursuit strategy with limited visual field in urban airspace: A multi-agent reinforcement learning approach,”IEEE CAA J. Autom. Sinica, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1350–1367, 2025

    2025

  145. [155]

    Synthetic aircraft trajectory generation using time-based VQ-V AE,

    A. Murad and M. Ruocco, “Synthetic aircraft trajectory generation using time-based VQ-V AE,”CoRR, vol. abs/2504.09101, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  146. [156]

    A variational autoencoder- based dimensionality reduction technique for generation forecasting in cyber-physical smart grids,

    D. Kaur, S. N. Islam, and M. A. Mahmud, “A variational autoencoder- based dimensionality reduction technique for generation forecasting in cyber-physical smart grids,” inProc. IEEE ICC, 2021, pp. 1–6

    2021

  147. [157]

    Trajectory design and beamforming in UA V-assisted wireless networks: A fine- tuned M2LLM-driven DRL-based framework,

    B. Yin, X. Fang, X. Wang, L. Yan, J. Wu, and J. Wang, “Trajectory design and beamforming in UA V-assisted wireless networks: A fine- tuned M2LLM-driven DRL-based framework,”IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 2025, early access, doi:10.1109/twc.2025.3605277

    2025

  148. [158]

    Getting LLM to think and act like a human being: logical path reasoning and replanning,

    L. Zhang, Q. Li, Y . Wang, and J. Zhao, “Getting LLM to think and act like a human being: logical path reasoning and replanning,” inProc. IEEE ICCAI, 2025, pp. 301–308

    2025

  149. [159]

    Exploring LLM-based multi-agent situation awareness for zero-trust space-air- ground integrated network,

    X. Cao, G. Nan, H. Guo, H. Mu, L. Wang, Y . Lin, Q. Zhou, J. Li, B. Qin, Q. Cui, X. Tao, H. Fang, H. Du, and T. Q. S. Quek, “Exploring LLM-based multi-agent situation awareness for zero-trust space-air- ground integrated network,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 43, no. 6, pp....

    2025

  150. [160]

    A novel UA V swarm decision-making system under unified task and spatial view,

    M. Zhu, H. Xu, T. Pang, G. Yu, M. Gao, and F. Xia, “A novel UA V swarm decision-making system under unified task and spatial view,” in Pro. IEEE AIoTC, 2025, pp. 790–797

    2025

  151. [161]

    VELO: A vector database- assisted cloud-edge collaborative LLM qos optimization framework,

    Z. Yao, Z. Tang, J. Lou, P. Shen, and W. Jia, “VELO: A vector database- assisted cloud-edge collaborative LLM qos optimization framework,” inProc. IEEE ICWS, 2024, pp. 865–876

    2024

  152. [162]

    Real-time integration of fine-tuned large language model for improved decision- making in reinforcement learning,

    X. Xiang, J. Xue, L. Zhao, Y . Lei, C. Yue, and K. Lu, “Real-time integration of fine-tuned large language model for improved decision- making in reinforcement learning,” inProc. IEEE IJCNN, 2024, pp. 1–8

    2024

  153. [163]

    Chatscene: Knowledge-enabled safety- critical scenario generation for autonomous vehicles,

    J. Zhang, C. Xu, and B. Li, “Chatscene: Knowledge-enabled safety- critical scenario generation for autonomous vehicles,” inProc. IEEE/CVF CVPR, 2024, pp. 15 459–15 469

    2024

  154. [164]

    Towards communication efficient multi-agent cooperations: Reinforcement learning and LLM,

    Y . Su, Y . Du, Y . Deng, and M. Dohler, “Towards communication efficient multi-agent cooperations: Reinforcement learning and LLM,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., pp. 1–15, 2025

    2025

  155. [166]

    Communication-efficient federated learning for LEO constellations integrated with HAPs using hybrid NOMA-OFDM,

    M. Elmahallawy, T. Luo, and K. Ramadan, “Communication-efficient federated learning for LEO constellations integrated with HAPs using hybrid NOMA-OFDM,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1097–1114, 2024

    2024

  156. [167]

    GATO: Global transmission optimization for SAGIN-assisted IoRT data collection,

    Y . Fan, Y . Bi, Y . Liu, D. Niyato, L. Zhao, Q. He, and A. Hawbani, “GATO: Global transmission optimization for SAGIN-assisted IoRT data collection,”IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 12 867–12 884, 2025

    2025

  157. [168]

    A survey on the unmanned aircraft system traffic management,

    A. Hamissi and A. Dhraief, “A survey on the unmanned aircraft system traffic management,”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 1–37, Mar. 2023

    2023

  158. [169]

    Stackelberg game-driven defense for isac against channel attacks in low-altitude networks,

    J. Wang, C. Zhao, D. Niyato, G. Sun, W. Yuan, A. Jamalipour, and T. Xiang, “Stackelberg game-driven defense for isac against channel attacks in low-altitude networks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.06359, 2025

    2025

  159. [170]

    Generative ai based secure wireless sensing for isac networks,

    J. Wang, H. Du, Y . Liu, G. Sun, D. Niyato, S. Mao, D. I. Kim, and X. Shen, “Generative ai based secure wireless sensing for isac networks,”IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2025

    2025

  160. [171]

    Security-aware joint sensing, communication, and comput- ing optimization in low altitude wireless networks,

    J. Wang, C. Zhao, J. He, G. Sun, W. Yuan, D. Niyato, L. Zhu, and T. Xiang, “Security-aware joint sensing, communication, and comput- ing optimization in low altitude wireless networks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.01451, 2025

    2025

  161. [172]

    Security threats and countermeasures of unmanned aerial vehicle communications,

    L. Wang, Y . Chen, P. Wang, and Z. Yan, “Security threats and countermeasures of unmanned aerial vehicle communications,”IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 41–47, 2022

    2022

  162. [173]

    Toward realization of low-altitude economy networks: Core architecture, integrated technologies, and future direc- tions,

    Y . Wang, G. Sun, Z. Sun, J. Wang, J. Li, C. Zhao, J. Wu, S. Liang, M. Yin, P. Wanget al., “Toward realization of low-altitude economy networks: Core architecture, integrated technologies, and future direc- tions,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21583, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  163. [174]

    Advanced wireless for unmanned aerial systems: 5g standardization, research challenges, and AERPAW architecture,

    V . Marojevic, I. Guvenc, R. Dutta, M. L. Sichitiu, and B. A. Floyd, “Advanced wireless for unmanned aerial systems: 5g standardization, research challenges, and AERPAW architecture,”IEEE Vehicular Tech- nology Magazine, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 22–30, Jun. 2020

    2020

  164. [175]

    AirSim: High-fidelity visual and physical simulation for autonomous vehicles,

    S. Shah, D. Dey, C. Lovett, and A. Kapoor, “AirSim: High-fidelity visual and physical simulation for autonomous vehicles,” inField and Service Robotics, ser. Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics, vol. 5. Springer, 2018, pp. 621–635

    2018

  165. [176]

    An end-to-end simulator for 5G NR networks,

    N. Patriciello, S. Lagen, B. Bojovic, and L. Giupponi, “An end-to-end simulator for 5G NR networks,”Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 96, p. 101933, 2019

    2019

  166. [177]

    DeepMIMO: A generic deep learning dataset for millimeter wave and massive MIMO applications,

    A. Alkhateeb, “DeepMIMO: A generic deep learning dataset for millimeter wave and massive MIMO applications,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.06435, 2019

    1902 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.