Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 268 references

Organizing transitions and their cascades: Generalized symmetry enforcement in massless flows or Higgs transitions

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that in the massless RG flows $M(p,p+1)\to M(p-1,p)$, the unbroken fusion ring $\mathrm{FR}(SU(2)_{p-2})$ makes every symmetry-preserving primary field in the infrared theory irrelevant, so the flow endpoint is stable…

desk verdict The paper's stability computation for M(p,p+1)->M(p-1,p) is correct and useful, but the abstract's 'demonstrate' overstates the conditional status of the flow and symmetry assumptions. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08428 v1 pith:BMX5JJTO submitted 2026-08-09 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elmath-phmath.MP

classification hep-thcond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elmath-phmath.MP PACS 73.43.Lp71.10.Pm
keywords masslessrenormalizationgroupflowunitaryminimalmodelsfusionringsymmetryalgebraicgeneralizedquantumdimensionsymmetry-enforcedgaplessness(half-)integerspinnonsimplecurrentlevel-rankdualitycascadeofphasetransitions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the massless renormalization-group flows between the unitary minimal conformal field theories $M(p,p+1)$ and $M(p-1,p)$ for integer $p>3$, under the assumption that the fusion ring $\mathrm{FR}(SU(2)_{p-2})$ is preserved along the flow. The central claim is that this unbroken symmetry eliminates every relevant perturbation in the infrared theory: any primary field that commutes with the preserved fusion-ring generators has conformal weight $h_{a'}>1$. If true, the endpoint $M(p-1,p)$ is stable at the level of scaling analysis without fine-tuning the perturbations, and the flow can be viewed as a sequence of weak symmetry-enforced gapless phases. The same structure explains why a seemingly irrelevant perturbation can become relevant when a relevant perturbation is present, producing cascades of phase transitions that the unbroken symmetry can stop.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the algebraic generalized quantum dimension (AGQD), $q_{\alpha,(a)}=S_{\alpha,a}/S_{I,a}$, where $S$ is the modular $S$ matrix; it converts the operator statement $[Q_{\alpha'},\Phi_{a'}]=0$ into the numerical equality $q_{\alpha',(I')}=q_{\alpha',(a')}$. Because the preserved fusion ring $\mathrm{FR}(SU(2)_{p-2})$ is generated by powers of the single object $|1,2|'$, the whole symmetry reduces to one equality, $2\cos(\pi/p)=2(-1)^{r'+s'}\cos(\pi s'/p)$, whose Kac-table solutions are $s'=1$ with $r'$ odd. A second ingredient is the folding trick: the pair of theories $M(p,p+1)$ and $M(p-1,p)$ combines into a coupled model containing a (half-)integer spin nonsimple current, an object of (half-)integer conformal spin whose fusion produces several fields, here playing the role of a paired object of nonabelian anyons and linking the unbroken symmetry to coset and level-rank duality structures.

What would settle it

Compute the full list of primary fields $|r',s'|'$ in $M(p-1,p)$ satisfying $q_{|1,2|',(a')}=2\cos(\pi/p)$ for $p=5,6,7$; the paper predicts only $|1,1|'$ and odd-$r'$ fields $|3,1|',|5,1|',\ldots$, all with $h>1$, so any additional solution with $h<1$ would falsify Eq. (13). A truncated-conformal-space simulation that finds a relevant symmetry-preserving direction at $M(p-1,p)$ would also disprove the stability claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery, on the paper's own terms, is Eq. (13): a bulk primary field $\Phi_{a'}$ of the infrared theory $M(p-1,p)$ that preserves the fusion ring symmetry $\mathrm{FR}(SU(2)_{p-2})$ is irrelevant, $h_{a'}>1$. The proof fixes the generator of the preserved ring to be $|1,2|'$ and uses the algebraic generalized quantum dimension $q_{|1,2|',(a')}=S_{|1,2|',a'}/S_{|1,1|',a'}$. Commutation with the symmetry forces $q_{|1,2|',(a')}=q_{|1,2|',(I')}=2\cos(\pi/p)$; substituting the minimal-model modular $S$ matrix shows that the only solutions are the vacuum and the Kac labels $|r',1|'$ with $r'$ odd. The conformal-weight formula then gives $h_{|r',1|'}-1 = (r'+1)(p r' - 3p + 2)/(4(p-1))$, which is positive for every nontrivial odd $r'$. Hence no relevant operator is invariant under the preserved symmetry, and the infrared theory is stable at the scaling level.

Load-bearing premise

The argument works only if the massless flow from $M(p,p+1)$ to $M(p-1,p)$ really exists and preserves precisely the fusion ring $\mathrm{FR}(SU(2)_{p-2})$ the whole way; if that identification is wrong, the no-relevant-perturbation conclusion does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every integer $p>3$, the infrared fixed point $M(p-1,p)$ of the massless flow has no relevant primary field that preserves $\mathrm{FR}(SU(2)_{p-2})$; the endpoint is stable at the scaling level.
  • The massless flows $M(p,p+1)\to M(p-1,p)$ form a sequence of weak symmetry-enforced gapless phases, with the unbroken fusion ring as the protecting symmetry.
  • Under the folding trick, the unbroken symmetry becomes a (half-)integer spin nonsimple current, which the paper identifies with the level-rank duality structure in the coset representation of the minimal models.
  • In the ultraviolet theory, the relevant operator $\Phi_{|1,3|}$ together with the naively irrelevant $\Phi_{|3,1|}$ can trigger a cascade $M(p,p+1)\to M(p-1,p)\to M(p-2,p-1)$, and enforcing the fusion ring symmetry can stop such cascades.
  • More generally, irrelevant perturbations cannot be neglected when a relevant perturbation is present; the paper argues they can become relevant at intermediate stages, so symmetry is needed to exclude them.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Read as a selection rule, Eq. (13) suggests that lattice or tensor-network realizations of these flows need only enforce the fusion ring symmetry to protect the endpoint; any remaining irrelevant terms are harmless unless they contain the specific $\Phi_{|3,1|}$-type mode that seeds a cascade.
  • The same AGQD-equality test applies to other families of massless flows; the paper's appendix shows that in the nonunitary flows treated there the equality can admit relevant solutions, so stability is not a generic consequence of symmetry preservation but depends on the Kac-label arithmetic of each family.
  • The cascade conjecture $\Phi_{|1,3|}+\Phi_{|3,1|}\to M(p-2,p-1)$ is concrete enough to test with truncated conformal space or tensor-network methods; if the system instead runs to an unexplored fixed point, the picture would need to be extended from symmetry-enforced stability to a landscape of symmetry-compatible endpoints.
  • Identifying the unbroken symmetry with level-rank duality structures hints that free-fermion models with nonabelian fusion rules could realize the same stopping mechanism, though the paper does not construct such a lattice model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies massless renormalization-group flows between unitary minimal models, M(p,p+1) → M(p−1,p) with p>3, that preserve the fusion ring FR(SU(2)_{p−2}). The central result is Eq. (13): every primary field in the IR theory that is invariant under the preserved fusion ring has chiral conformal dimension h > 1, so all symmetry-preserving perturbations are irrelevant and the IR fixed point is stable at the level of scaling analysis. The proof uses the algebraic generalized quantum dimension (AGQD): invariance under the generator |1,2|′ forces its AGQD to equal that of the vacuum, which, through the minimal-model S-matrix, fixes the Kac labels to s′=1, r′ odd; the conformal-weight formula then gives h−1>0 for every non-vacuum solution. The paper also gives a folding-trick, coset, and level-rank-duality interpretation of the preserved symmetry as a (half-)integer spin nonsimple current, and proposes a resonance mechanism by which an irrelevant UV perturbation can become relevant in the IR and trigger cascades of flows. The main result is explicitly conditional on the existence of the massless flow and on the identification of the preserved symmetry, as acknowledged in Sec. I.B.

Significance. If the flow exists and preserves FR(SU(2)_{p−2}) as imported from [39] and [16], the derivation in Sec. II.B is elementary, self-contained, and correct. It provides a clean, parameter-free symmetry argument that no relevant primary field survives the symmetry constraint, and it usefully recasts the massless minimal-model flows as weak symmetry-enforced gaplessness. The paper is honest about the non-perturbative, conditional nature of the algebraic method in Sec. I.B and clearly labels the coset/level-rank and cascade discussions as phenomenological or conjectural. The main limitations are the external assumptions of flow existence and symmetry identification, and the abstract/conclusion wording that overstates the strength of the demonstration relative to the body.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. I.B; Sec. II.A] The central stability claim Eq. (13) is proved only under the external assumptions that the massless flow M(p,p+1)→M(p−1,p) exists and that the preserved symmetry is the full FR(SU(2)_{p−2}) with generator |1,2|′, both imported from [39] and [16]. The paper itself states in Sec. I.B that the algebraic method assumes the existence of the RG flow and does not by itself ensure stability. Nevertheless, the abstract and several concluding statements use the word 'demonstrate' without this qualification. Please revise the abstract and conclusion to make the conditional status explicit, for example by writing 'assuming the flow exists and preserves FR(SU(2)_{p−2}), the scaling-level stability follows.' This is a scoping and wording issue, but it is important because the physical interpretation as symmetry-enforced gaplessness inherits the unproven flow existence.
  2. [Sec. V.A, Eq. (79); Abstract] The abstract states that 'we demonstrate that the structure of (half-)integer spin nonsimple current plays a fundamental role in causing the resonance effect ... may result in the cascade of phase transitions,' but the body does not demonstrate this. Equation (79) is introduced explicitly as a conjecture ('we conjecture'), and the text says 'we do not provide conclusive arguments' and leaves numerical tests as an open problem. The scaling-level argument in Eqs. (81)–(85) is suggestive, but it assumes the operator mapping Φ_{α_c}→Φ_{α'_c} under the relevant perturbation, which is itself part of the conjecture. Please present the cascade mechanism as a conjectural scenario, not as a demonstrated result, in the abstract and conclusion.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. V.A] The first sentence of Sec. V.A says 'In the UV theory M(p−1,p), the set of FR(SU(2)_{p−2}) symmetric bulk fields is {Φ_{1,s}}_{s:odd}'; the UV theory of the flow under discussion is M(p,p+1), not M(p−1,p). Please correct this label.
  2. [Abstract] The overline in M(p−1,p) is used in the abstract but not defined there, and the main text drops it after Sec. II. Please define the notation once in the introduction and use it consistently.
  3. [Sec. III.B] The word 'intuitvely' should be 'intuitively'; the same section would benefit from displaying the Kac-label solution |3,1|′ alongside the AGQD calculation, since it is the only nontrivial field for p=5 and the logic is otherwise implicit.
  4. [Sec. IV] There are several typographical errors, including 'intereted' and 'compilcations' in Sec. IV; please proofread the manuscript.
  5. [Eq. (24)] The notation FR(SU(2)_{p−2}) = {Q_{|1,v′|′}}_{v′=1}^{p−1} could be misread as an equality of the fusion ring to a finite set of operators; it would be clearer to say that these are the simple objects, with Q_{|1,2|′} as the generator, as used in Eq. (25).
  6. [Sec. II.B after Eq. (28)] The sentence 'where we have labelled a′ = |r′, s′|′' should be 'where we have labelled a′ = |r′, s′|′' with standard grammar; also please state explicitly that Eq. (29) is to be read up to the Kac-table identification, as the body does.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the central stability proof is algebraic, external-input conditional, and does not reduce to its conclusion.

full rationale

The derivation of Eq. (13) is conditional on external inputs, not circular. The paper imports the existence of the massless flow M(p,p+1) -> M(p-1,p) and the identification of the unbroken fusion ring FR(SU(2)_{p-2}) from the prior literature ([39] and [16]); Sec. I.B states this explicitly: "the algebraic method usually (implicitly) requires one to assume the existence of the RG flow." Given those inputs, the proof is a direct calculation: invariance under the generator |1,2|' forces the AGQD equality q_{|1,2|',(a')} = q_{|1,2|',(I')}; substituting the standard modular S-matrix gives Eq. (28), whose solutions are s'=1 and r' odd; the Kac formula then yields h_{|r',1|'} - 1 = (r'+1)(p r' - 3p + 2)/(4(p-1)) > 0 for every non-vacuum odd r' >= 3. There is no fitted parameter, no post-hoc exclusion of unwanted fields, and no use of the target statement within the derivation. The acknowledged disorder-field subtlety concerns the converse direction and does not feed into the exclusion, since the paper only uses [Q,Phi]=0 as a necessary condition. The cascade discussion in Sec. V is explicitly conjectural (Eq. (79) is labeled a conjecture), and the coset/level-rank phenomenology is presented as organization of known structures, not as a derivation of Eq. (13). No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs, and the self-citations to the authors' prior framework are not used to replace the independent algebraic computation. Therefore the paper is not circular; at most it is conditional, and that conditionality is disclosed in the text.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central stability claim rests on the standard minimal-model data (Kac formula, modular S-matrix), the assumed existence of the massless flow, and the preservation of FR(SU(2)_{p-2}) along it. The coset and level-rank reinterpretations and the cascade mechanism additionally rely on explicitly conjectural equivalences and on an imported field-identification law; these do not feed into the core Eq. (13) but drive the paper's broader claims. No free parameters are fitted. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are postulated; the terms '(half-)integer spin nonsimple current' and 'spin-2 chiral-chiral nonsimple current' rename known algebraic objects (connected etale algebra, condensable algebra, phantom current) rather than introduce new entities.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The massless RG flow M(p,p+1) -> M(p-1,p) exists and preserves the fusion ring FR(SU(2)_{p-2}).
    Imported from [16] and [39]; used in Sec. II.A (Eqs. 11 and 24) to identify the unbroken symmetry at the IR. The stability claim (Eq. 14) is explicitly conditional on this assumption.
  • standard math A primary field commuting with the topological symmetry operator satisfies q_{alpha',(I')} = q_{alpha',(a')} (Eq. 23).
    Derived in Sec. II.B via operator-state correspondence (Eqs. 20-22). Standard in Verlinde-line arguments, but the paper acknowledges that direct commutators can generate disorder fields, so the step is a working assumption in full generality.
  • standard math The generator of FR(SU(2)_{p-2}) is |1,2|' and all other elements are polynomials in it (Eqs. 24-26).
    Follows from the Verlinde algebra of M(p-1,p); used to reduce the invariance condition to the single generator.
  • standard math Equality of AGQDs with the vacuum selects exactly the Kac labels s'=1, r' odd (Eq. 29).
    Direct solution of Eq. (28); uses the explicit modular S-matrix of minimal models (Appendix A).
  • ad hoc to paper Conjectural category equivalences underlying Eqs. (7), (61), (63): Witt equivalence SU(2)_{p-2} box-product SU(2)_{p-2} ~ C and the level-rank duality embedding of Eq. (64).
    Sec. IV uses these to present coset and level-rank representations of the unbroken symmetry. The paper explicitly says the mathematical framework is still in development and that the appearance of FR(SU(2)_{p-2}) from Eq. (64) is a conjecture.
  • domain assumption Field identification under the RG domain wall: Phi_{|1,3|} -> Phi_{|3,1|}' and Phi_{|3,1|} -> Phi_{|1,3|}' (Eq. 91).
    Sec. V.B imports this from [16,39] and uses it to argue the cascade can run down the entire minimal-model chain; the cascade conclusion (Eq. 92) is presented as conditional on this perturbative law.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Organizing transitions and their cascades: Generalized symmetry enforcement in massless flows or Higgs transitions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BMX5JJTO

@misc{pith2026260808428,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Organizing transitions and their cascades: Generalized symmetry enforcement in massless flows or Higgs transitions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BMX5JJTO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08428}
}
abstract

We study the role of generalized symmetry in massless renormalization group flows or Higgs transitions. In particular, we revisit the massless renormalization group flows in unitary minimal models, $\mathbf{M}(p,p+1) \rightarrow \overline{\mathbf{M}(p-1,p)}$ preserving the fusion ring symmetry $\text{FR} (SU(2)_{p-2})\subset \mathbf{M}(p,p+1)$ where $p$ is an integer satisfying $p>3$. In this series of flows, we demonstrate that the unbroken fusion ring symmetry $\text{FR} (SU(2)_{p-2})$ eliminates all relevant perturbations in the $\overline{\mathbf{M}(p-1,p)}$ model. Hence, the infrared theory $\overline{\mathbf{M}(p-1,p)}$ is stable at the level of the scaling analysis and can be interpreted as a (weak-)symmetry-enforced gapless phase in contemporary theoretical physics. Phenomenologically, by the folding trick, the unbroken fusion ring symmetry corresponds to a (half-)integer spin nonsimple current, a variant of the Cooper pair involving nonabelian anyons generated from the coset or level-rank duality structures. Moreover, we demonstrate that the structure of (half-)integer spin nonsimple current plays a fundamental role in causing the resonance effect of relevant and dangerously irrelevant perturbations. This resonance effect may result in the cascade of phase transitions (or the system flows to unexplored fixed points), and the symmetry can be a stopper of such unconventional flows.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08428 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Summary of nontrivial phenomena from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The conceptual picture of the RG flow between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. This figure shows how the (half-)integer spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Possible scenario for the resonance effect [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

268 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [39]

    Fukusumi and T

    Y. Fukusumi and T. Kawamoto,Generalizing quantum dimensions: Symmetry-based classification of local pseudo-Hermitian systems and the corresponding 21 domain walls,arXiv:2511.11059 [hep-th]

  2. [16]

    J. M. Leinaas and J. Myrheim,On the theory of identical particles,Nuovo Cim. B37(1977) 1–23

  3. [1]

    electron

    For example, one can consider pairing of a chiral CFT and a different antichiral CFT, but with the same fusion rule(see [218], for example). We address this problem in the forthcoming paper. In both cases, the unbroken symmetryAub ∼A ub ⊠ A′ub will correspond to the (half-)integer spin nonsim- ple current (see Figure 3), or nonabelian anyonic ana- log of ...

  4. [2]

    In this subsection, we provide the elementary data of the model that we used in the main text

    Elementary data of minimal conformal field theory The minimal model is a landmark conformal field the- ory established in [86]. In this subsection, we provide the elementary data of the model that we used in the main text. The model can be characterized by two integerp, q and denoted asM(p, q), and the central charge of the model is, c= 1−6 (q−p) 2 pq (A1...

  5. [3]

    Related arguments can be seen in the corre- sponding review parts of the works by the authors and collaborators[33, 35]

    Modular property and topological symmetry In this section, we introduce some basic aspects of min- imal conformal field theories and their topological sym- metries. Related arguments can be seen in the corre- sponding review parts of the works by the authors and collaborators[33, 35]. We note a few textbooks and re- views for references[131, 132, 135, 136...

  6. [4]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, Generalized Global Symmetries,JHEP02(2015) 172, arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

  7. [5]

    (B12) can be solved completely

    Examples We provide two explicit examples in which Eq. (B12) can be solved completely. In the first example, every non- vacuum solution is irrelevant. In the second example, the solution set contains a non-vacuum relevant primary. a. An example without non-vacuum relevant solutions Let us first take q= 7, k= 1, I= 2,(B23) so thatP= 5and the flow is M(9,7)...

  8. [6]

    Cobanera, G

    E. Cobanera, G. Ortiz, and Z. Nussinov,Unified approach to Quantum and Classical Dualities,Phys. Rev. Lett.104(2010) 020402, arXiv:0907.0733 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

Show all 268 references
  1. [7]

    Cobanera, G

    E. Cobanera, G. Ortiz, and Z. Nussinov,The Bond-Algebraic Approach to Dualities,Adv. Phys.60 (2011) 679–798, arXiv:1103.2776 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

  2. [8]

    Cobanera, G

    E. Cobanera, G. Ortiz, and Z. Nussinov,Holographic symmetries and generalized order parameters for topological matter,Phys. Rev. B87(2013) 041105, arXiv:1211.0564 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

  3. [9]

    J. L. Cardy,Boundary Conditions, Fusion Rules and the Verlinde Formula,Nucl. Phys. B324(1989) 581–596

  4. [10]

    McGreevy,Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter,Ann

    J. McGreevy,Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter,Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys.14(2023) 57–82, arXiv:2204.03045 [cond-mat.str-el]

  5. [11]

    Cordova, T

    C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu, K. Intriligator, and S.-H. Shao,Snowmass White Paper: Generalized Symmetries in Quantum Field Theory and Beyond,in Snowmass 2021. 5, 2022. arXiv:2205.09545 [hep-th]

  6. [12]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre, and H. Tillim,Lectures on generalized symmetries,Phys. Rept.1051(2024) 1–87, arXiv:2307.07547 [hep-th]

  7. [13]

    V. B. Petkova and J. B. Zuber,Generalized Twisted Partition Functions,Phys. Lett. B504(2001) 157–164, arXiv:hep-th/0011021

  8. [14]

    Bockenhauer, D

    J. Bockenhauer, D. E. Evans, and Y. Kawahigashi, Chiral structure of modular invariants for subfactors, Commun. Math. Phys.210(2000) 733–784, arXiv:math/9907149

  9. [15]

    R. E. Behrend, P. A. Pearce, V. B. Petkova, and J.-B. Zuber,Boundary conditions in rational conformal field theories,Nucl. Phys. B570(2000) 525–589, arXiv:hep-th/9908036

  10. [17]

    G. A. Goldin, R. Menikoff, and D. H. Sharp,Particle Statistics From Induced Representations of a Local Current Group,J. Math. Phys.21(1980) 650

  11. [18]

    Ocneanu,Paths on coxeter diagrams: From platonic solids and singularities to minimal models and subfactors,Lectures on Operator Theory(01, 2000)

    A. Ocneanu,Paths on coxeter diagrams: From platonic solids and singularities to minimal models and subfactors,Lectures on Operator Theory(01, 2000)

  12. [19]

    Kitaev and L

    A. Kitaev and L. Kong,Models for Gapped Boundaries and Domain Walls,Commun. Math. Phys.313(2012) 351–373, arXiv:1104.5047 [cond-mat.str-el]

  13. [20]

    Kawahigashi,Two-dimensional topological order and operator algebras,Int

    Y. Kawahigashi,Two-dimensional topological order and operator algebras,Int. J. Mod. Phys. B35(2021) 2130003, arXiv:2102.10953 [math-ph]

  14. [21]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov,Renormalization Group and Perturbation Theory Near Fixed Points in Two-Dimensional Field Theory,Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.46 (1987) 1090

  15. [22]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov,Higher Order Integrals of Motion in Two-Dimensional Models of the Field Theory with a Broken Conformal Symmetry,JETP Lett.46(1987) 160–164

  16. [23]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov,Integrable field theory from conformal field theory,Adv. Stud. Pure Math.19 (1989) 641–674

  17. [24]

    Hung and Y

    L.-Y. Hung and Y. Wan,Generalized ADE classification of topological boundaries and anyon condensation,JHEP07(2015) 120, arXiv:1502.02026 [cond-mat.str-el]

  18. [25]

    T. Lan, J. C. Wang, and X.-G. Wen,Gapped Domain Walls, Gapped Boundaries and Topological Degeneracy,Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 076402, arXiv:1408.6514 [cond-mat.str-el]

  19. [26]

    R. B. Laughlin,Anomalous quantum Hall effect: An Incompressible quantum fluid with fractionallycharged excitations,Phys. Rev. Lett.50(1983) 1395

  20. [27]

    Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,Commun

    E. Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,Commun. Math. Phys.121(1989) 351–399

  21. [28]

    G. W. Moore and N. Read,Nonabelions in the fractional quantum Hall effect,Nucl. Phys. B360 (1991) 362–396

  22. [29]

    Antinucci, C

    A. Antinucci, C. Copetti, Y. Gai, and S. Schafer-Nameki,Categorical Anomaly Matching, arXiv:2508.00982 [hep-th]

  23. [30]

    Wan and C

    Y. Wan and C. Wang,Fermion Condensation and Gapped Domain Walls in Topological Orders,JHEP 03(2017) 172, arXiv:1607.01388 [cond-mat.str-el]

  24. [31]

    R. B. Zeev, B. Ergun, E. Milan, and S. S. Razamat, Categorical structure of the set of all CFTs,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 025019, arXiv:2212.11022 [hep-th]

  25. [32]

    Fukusumi,Composing parafermions: a construction ofZ N fractional quantum Hall systems and a modern understanding of confinement and duality, arXiv:2212.12999 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Y. Fukusumi,Composing parafermions: a construction ofZ N fractional quantum Hall systems and a modern understanding of confinement and duality, arXiv:2212.12999 [cond-mat.str-el]

  26. [33]

    Y. Fukusumi,Gauging or extending bulk and boundary conformal field theories: Application to bulk and domain wall problem in topological matter and their descriptions by mock modular covariant,Phys. Rev. B112(2025) 075144, arXiv:2412.19577 [hep-th]

  27. [34]

    Fukusumi and S

    Y. Fukusumi and S. Yahagi,Extending fusion rules with finite subgroups: A general construction ofZN extended conformal field theories and their orbifoldings,SciPost Phys.20(2026) 136, arXiv:2508.08639 [hep-th]

  28. [35]

    Kong,Anyon condensation and tensor categories, Nucl

    L. Kong,Anyon condensation and tensor categories, Nucl. Phys. B886(2014) 436–482, arXiv:1307.8244 [cond-mat.str-el]. [31]Cis the field of complex number. In this manuscript, we also useZas the set of integers

  29. [36]

    Y. Zhao, H. Wang, Y. Hu, and Y. Wan,Symmetry fractionalized (irrationalized) fusion rules and two domain-wall Verlinde formulae,JHEP04(2024) 115, arXiv:2304.08475 [cond-mat.str-el]

  30. [37]

    Fukusumi and Y

    Y. Fukusumi and Y. Furuta,Homomorphism, substructure, and ideal: Elementary but rigorous aspects of renormalization group or hierarchical structure of topological orders,Phys. Rev. B113 (2026) 155103, arXiv:2506.23155 [hep-th]

  31. [38]

    Brunner and D

    I. Brunner and D. Roggenkamp,Defects and bulk perturbations of boundary Landau-Ginzburg orbifolds, JHEP04(2008) 001, arXiv:0712.0188 [hep-th]

  32. [40]

    Fukusumi and T

    Y. Fukusumi and T. Kawamoto,Generalizing fusion rules by shuffle: Symmetry-based classifications of nonlocal systems constructed from similarity transformations,arXiv:2512.02139 [hep-th]

  33. [41]

    Fukusumi,Classifying fusion rules of anyons or SymTFTs: A general algebraic formula for domain wall problems and quantum phase transitions, arXiv:2512.21687 [hep-th]

    Y. Fukusumi,Classifying fusion rules of anyons or SymTFTs: A general algebraic formula for domain wall problems and quantum phase transitions, arXiv:2512.21687 [hep-th]

  34. [42]

    Poghosyan and R

    H. Poghosyan and R. Poghossian,RG flow between W3 minimal models by perturbation and domain wall approaches,JHEP08(2022) 307, arXiv:2205.05091 [hep-th]

  35. [43]

    Gaiotto,Domain Walls for Two-Dimensional Renormalization Group Flows,JHEP12(2012) 103, arXiv:1201.0767 [hep-th]

    D. Gaiotto,Domain Walls for Two-Dimensional Renormalization Group Flows,JHEP12(2012) 103, arXiv:1201.0767 [hep-th]

  36. [44]

    Stanishkov,RG domain wall for the generalcsu(2) coset models,JHEP08(2016) 096, arXiv:1606.03605 [hep-th]

    M. Stanishkov,RG domain wall for the generalcsu(2) coset models,JHEP08(2016) 096, arXiv:1606.03605 [hep-th]

  37. [45]

    Stanishkov,Second order RG flow in generalbsu(2) coset models,JHEP09(2016) 040, arXiv:1606.04328 [hep-th]

    M. Stanishkov,Second order RG flow in generalbsu(2) coset models,JHEP09(2016) 040, arXiv:1606.04328 [hep-th]

  38. [46]

    Klos and D

    F. Klos and D. Roggenkamp,Complementary projection defects and decomposition,JHEP03(2021) 195, arXiv:2006.08961 [hep-th]

  39. [47]

    Poghosyan and R

    H. Poghosyan and R. Poghossian,RG flows between W3 minimal models,PoSRegio2021(2022) 039

  40. [48]

    P. W. Higgs,Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons,Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 508–509

  41. [49]

    Klos and D

    F. Klos and D. Roggenkamp,Realizing IR theories by projections in the UV,JHEP01(2020) 097, arXiv:1907.12339 [hep-th]

  42. [50]

    Wong and I

    E. Wong and I. Affleck,Tunneling in quantum wires: A Boundary conformal field theory approach,Nucl. Phys. B417(1994) 403–438, arXiv:cond-mat/9311040

  43. [51]

    Frohlich, J

    J. Frohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, Algebras in tensor categories and coset conformal field theories,Fortsch. Phys.52(2004) 672–677, arXiv:hep-th/0309269

  44. [52]

    Frohlich, J

    J. Frohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, Correspondences of ribbon categories,Adv. Math.199 (2006) 192–329, arXiv:math/0309465

  45. [53]

    Cordova, D

    C. Cordova, D. García-Sepúlveda, and K. Ohmori, Higgsing Transitions from Topological Field Theory & Non-Invertible Symmetry in Chern-Simons Matter Theories,arXiv:2504.03614 [hep-th]

  46. [54]

    Dijkgraaf, C

    R. Dijkgraaf, C. Vafa, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde,The Operator Algebra of Orbifold Models, Commun. Math. Phys.123(1989) 485

  47. [55]

    F. A. Bais and J. K. Slingerland,Condensate induced transitions between topologically ordered phases,Phys. Rev. B79(2009) 045316, arXiv:0808.0627 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

  48. [56]

    Cheng and N

    M. Cheng and N. Seiberg,Proliferation transitions from a topological phase in2 + 1dimensions, arXiv:2603.00245 [cond-mat.str-el]

  49. [57]

    Vafa,Modular Invariance and Discrete Torsion on Orbifolds,Nucl

    C. Vafa,Modular Invariance and Discrete Torsion on Orbifolds,Nucl. Phys. B273(1986) 592–606

  50. [58]

    Kreuzer and A

    M. Kreuzer and A. N. Schellekens,Simple currents versus orbifolds with discrete torsion: A Complete classification,Nucl. Phys. B411(1994) 97–121, arXiv:hep-th/9306145

  51. [59]

    A. N. Schellekens and S. Yankielowicz,Field Identification Fixed Points in the Coset Construction, Nucl. Phys. B334(1990) 67–102

  52. [60]

    A. N. Schellekens,Fusion rule automorphisms from integer spin simple currents,Phys. Lett. B244(1990) 255–260

  53. [61]

    Gato-Rivera and A

    B. Gato-Rivera and A. N. Schellekens,Complete classification of simple current automorphisms,Nucl. Phys. B353(1991) 519–537

  54. [62]

    Hansson, M

    T. Hansson, M. Hermanns, S. Simon, and S. Viefers, Quantum hall physics: Hierarchies and conformal field theory techniques,Reviews of Modern Physics89 (May, 2017) 025005

  55. [63]

    Fuchs, C

    J. Fuchs, C. Schweigert, and J. Walcher,Projections in string theory and boundary states for Gepner models, Nucl. Phys. B588(2000) 110–148, arXiv:hep-th/0003298

  56. [64]

    Cappelli and G

    A. Cappelli and G. Viola,Partition Functions of Non-Abelian Quantum Hall States,J. Phys. A44 (2011) 075401, arXiv:1007.1732 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

  57. [65]

    Schoutens and X.-G

    K. Schoutens and X.-G. Wen,Simple-current algebra constructions of 2+1-dimensional topological orders, Phys. Rev. B93(2016) 045109, arXiv:1508.01111 [cond-mat.str-el]

  58. [66]

    Kaidi, Z

    J. Kaidi, Z. Komargodski, K. Ohmori, S. Seifnashri, and S.-H. Shao,Higher central charges and topological boundaries in 2+1-dimensional TQFTs,SciPost Phys. 13(2022) 067, arXiv:2107.13091 [hep-th]

  59. [67]

    Davydov, M

    A. Davydov, M. Muger, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, The witt group of non-degenerate braided fusion categories,Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal)2013(2013) 135–177

  60. [68]

    Bardeen, L

    J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer,Theory of superconductivity,Phys. Rev.108(1957) 1175–1204

  61. [69]

    F. J. Burnell, S. H. Simon, and J. K. Slingerland, Condensation of achiral simple currents in topological lattice models: Hamiltonian study of topological symmetry breaking,Phys. Rev. B84(Sep, 2011) 125434

  62. [70]

    Kikuchi, K.-S

    K. Kikuchi, K.-S. Kam, and F.-H. Huang,Anyon condensation in mixed-state topological order, arXiv:2406.14320 [hep-th]

  63. [71]

    Huston, F

    P. Huston, F. Burnell, C. Jones, and D. Penneys, Composing topological domain walls and anyon mobility,SciPost Phys.15(2023) 076, arXiv:2208.14018 [cond-mat.str-el]

  64. [72]

    Fukusumi and B

    Y. Fukusumi and B. Yang,Fermionic fractional quantum Hall states: A modern approach to systems with bulk-edge correspondence,Phys. Rev. B108 (2023) 085123, arXiv:2212.12993 [cond-mat.str-el]

  65. [73]

    Zhang, A

    C. Zhang, A. Vishwanath, and X.-G. Wen,Hierarchy construction for non-Abelian fractional quantum Hall states via anyon condensation,Phys. Rev. B112 (2025) 125116, arXiv:2406.12068 [cond-mat.str-el]

  66. [74]

    J. L. Cardy,Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally Invariant Theories,Nucl. Phys. B270 (1986) 186–204

  67. [75]

    Kikuchi,Rational RG flow, extension, and Witt class,arXiv:2412.08935 [hep-th]

    K. Kikuchi,Rational RG flow, extension, and Witt class,arXiv:2412.08935 [hep-th]

  68. [76]

    Davydov, D

    A. Davydov, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik,On the structure of the witt group of braided fusion categories,2011

  69. [77]

    A. M. Polyakov,Nonhamiltonian approach to conformal quantum field theory,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 66(1974) 23–42. 22

  70. [78]

    A. J. A. James, R. M. Konik, P. Lecheminant, N. J. Robinson, and A. M. Tsvelik,Non-perturbative methodologies for low-dimensional strongly-correlated systems: From non-abelian bosonization to truncated spectrum methods,Reports on Progress in Physics81 (Feb, 2018) 046002

  71. [79]

    V. P. Yurov and A. B. Zamolodchikov,TRUNCATED CONFORMAL SPACE APPROACH TO SCALING LEE-YANG MODEL,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A5(1990) 3221–3246

  72. [80]

    V. P. Yurov and A. B. Zamolodchikov,Truncated fermionic space approach to the critical 2-D Ising model with magnetic field,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A6 (1991) 4557–4578

  73. [81]

    Hogervorst, S

    M. Hogervorst, S. Rychkov, and B. C. van Rees, Truncated conformal space approach in d dimensions: A cheap alternative to lattice field theory?,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 025005, arXiv:1409.1581 [hep-th]

  74. [82]

    Belletête, A

    J. Belletête, A. M. Gainutdinov, J. L. Jacobsen, H. Saleur, and T. S. Tavares,Topological defects in periodic RSOS models and anyonic chains, arXiv:2003.11293 [math-ph]

  75. [83]

    Grimm,The Quantum Ising Chain With a Generalized Defect,Nucl

    U. Grimm,The Quantum Ising Chain With a Generalized Defect,Nucl. Phys. B340(1990) 633–658, arXiv:hep-th/0310089

  76. [84]

    Grimm,Spectrum of a duality twisted Ising quantum chain,J

    U. Grimm,Spectrum of a duality twisted Ising quantum chain,J. Phys. A35(2002) L25–L30, arXiv:hep-th/0111157

  77. [85]

    Belletête, A

    J. Belletête, A. M. Gainutdinov, J. L. Jacobsen, H. Saleur, and T. S. Tavares,Topological Defects in Lattice Models and Affine Temperley–Lieb Algebra, Commun. Math. Phys.400(2023) 1203–1254, arXiv:1811.02551 [hep-th]

  78. [86]

    A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov,Infinite Conformal Symmetry in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,Nucl. Phys. B241(1984) 333–380

  79. [87]

    Giokas and G

    P. Giokas and G. Watts,The renormalisation group for the truncated conformal space approach on the cylinder,arXiv:1106.2448 [hep-th]

  80. [88]

    Poghosyan and H

    A. Poghosyan and H. Poghosyan,Mixing with descendant fields in perturbed minimal CFT models, JHEP10(2013) 131, arXiv:1305.6066 [hep-th]

  81. [89]

    Poghossian,Two Dimensional Renormalization Group Flows in Next to Leading Order,JHEP01 (2014) 167, arXiv:1303.3015 [hep-th]

    R. Poghossian,Two Dimensional Renormalization Group Flows in Next to Leading Order,JHEP01 (2014) 167, arXiv:1303.3015 [hep-th]

  82. [90]

    C. Wang, A. Nahum, M. A. Metlitski, C. Xu, and T. Senthil,Deconfined quantum critical points: symmetries and dualities,Phys. Rev. X7(2017) 031051, arXiv:1703.02426 [cond-mat.str-el]

  83. [91]

    Wang and T

    C. Wang and T. Senthil,Interacting fermionic topological insulators/superconductors in three dimensions,Phys. Rev. B89(2014) 195124, arXiv:1401.1142 [cond-mat.str-el]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.B 91, 239902 (2015)]

  84. [92]

    Wang and T

    C. Wang and T. Senthil,Composite fermi liquids in the lowest Landau level,Phys. Rev. B94(2016) 245107, arXiv:1604.06807 [cond-mat.str-el]

  85. [93]

    Sodemann, I

    I. Sodemann, I. Kimchi, C. Wang, and T. Senthil, Composite fermion duality for half-filled multicomponent Landau Levels,Phys. Rev. B95 (2017) 085135, arXiv:1609.08616 [cond-mat.str-el]

  86. [94]

    Goddard, A

    P. Goddard, A. Kent, and D. I. Olive,Unitary Representations of the Virasoro and Supervirasoro Algebras,Commun. Math. Phys.103(1986) 105–119

  87. [95]

    M. L. Kim, S. D. Pace, and S.-H. Shao, Symmetry-Enforced Fermi Surfaces,Phys. Rev. Lett. 136(2026) 176502, arXiv:2512.04150 [cond-mat.str-el]

  88. [96]

    Goddard, A

    P. Goddard, A. Kent, and D. I. Olive,Virasoro Algebras and Coset Space Models,Phys. Lett. B152 (1985) 88–92

  89. [97]

    Goddard and D

    P. Goddard and D. I. Olive,Kac-Moody Algebras, Conformal Symmetry and Critical Exponents,Nucl. Phys. B257(1985) 226–252

  90. [98]

    Nakanishi and A

    T. Nakanishi and A. Tsuchiya,Level rank duality of WZW models in conformal field theory,Commun. Math. Phys.144(1992) 351–372

  91. [99]

    Goddard and A

    P. Goddard and A. Schwimmer,Unitary Construction of Extended Conformal Algebras,Phys. Lett. B206 (1988) 62–70

  92. [100]

    Kuniba and T

    A. Kuniba and T. Nakanishi,LEVEL RANK DUALITY IN FUSION RSOS MODELS,in International Colloquium on Modern Quantum Field Theory. 1, 1990

  93. [101]

    Kuniba, T

    A. Kuniba, T. Nakanishi, and J. Suzuki, Ferromagnetizations and antiferromagnetizations in RSOS models,Nucl. Phys. B356(1991) 750–774

  94. [102]

    Hsin and N

    P.-S. Hsin and N. Seiberg,Level/rank Duality and Chern-Simons-Matter Theories,JHEP09(2016) 095, arXiv:1607.07457 [hep-th]

  95. [103]

    Altschuler, M

    D. Altschuler, M. Bauer, and H. Saleur,Level rank duality in nonunitary coset theories,J. Phys. A23 (1990) L789–L794

  96. [104]

    S. G. Naculich and H. J. Schnitzer,Duality Between SU(N)-k and SU(k)-NWZW Models,Nucl. Phys. B 347(1990) 687–742

  97. [105]

    Aharony, F

    O. Aharony, F. Benini, P.-S. Hsin, and N. Seiberg, Chern-Simons-matter dualities withSOandU Sp gauge groups,JHEP02(2017) 072, arXiv:1611.07874 [cond-mat.str-el]

  98. [106]

    M. J. Martins,The Thermodynamic Bethe ansatz for deformed W A(N)-1 conformal field theories,Phys. Lett. B277(1992) 301–305, arXiv:hep-th/9201032

  99. [107]

    Blumenhagen, W

    R. Blumenhagen, W. Eholzer, A. Honecker, K. Hornfeck, and R. Hubel,Unifying W algebras, Phys. Lett. B332(1994) 51–60, arXiv:hep-th/9404113

  100. [108]

    Blumenhagen, W

    R. Blumenhagen, W. Eholzer, A. Honecker, K. Hornfeck, and R. Hubel,Coset realization of unifying W algebras,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A10(1995) 2367–2430, arXiv:hep-th/9406203

  101. [109]

    Crnkovic, R

    C. Crnkovic, R. Paunov, G. M. Sotkov, and M. Stanishkov,Fusions of Conformal Models,Nucl. Phys. B336(1990) 637–690

  102. [110]

    Antinucci, C

    A. Antinucci, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, Defect Conformal Manifolds from Phantom 23 (Non-Invertible) Symmetries, arXiv:2505.09668 [hep-th]

  103. [111]

    Dunning,Massless flows between minimal W models,Phys

    C. Dunning,Massless flows between minimal W models,Phys. Lett. B537(2002) 297–305, arXiv:hep-th/0204090

  104. [112]

    We thank Yunqin Zheng for the corresponding discussion

  105. [113]

    Ambrosino and T

    F. Ambrosino and T. Procházka,RG flows of minimal W-algebra CFTs via non-invertible symmetries, arXiv:2601.18667 [hep-th]

  106. [114]

    Seiberg,Electric - magnetic duality in supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories,Nucl

    N. Seiberg,Electric - magnetic duality in supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories,Nucl. Phys. B435(1995) 129–146, arXiv:hep-th/9411149

  107. [115]

    Furuta, Y

    Y. Furuta, Y. Kusuki, and T. Onagi,Transmission coefficients from phantom currents,Phys. Rev. D113 (2026) 045008, arXiv:2511.00356 [hep-th]

  108. [116]

    Zhang, J.-H

    J.-R. Zhang, J.-H. Jin, T.-K. Chen, and J. Chen, Defect Conformal Manifolds along RG Domain Walls betweenZ N-Parafermions and Minimal Models, arXiv:2605.24978 [hep-th]

  109. [117]

    Gukov,Counting RG flows,JHEP01(2016) 020, arXiv:1503.01474 [hep-th]

    S. Gukov,Counting RG flows,JHEP01(2016) 020, arXiv:1503.01474 [hep-th]

  110. [118]

    Kutasov, A

    D. Kutasov, A. Schwimmer, and N. Seiberg,Chiral rings, singularity theory and electric - magnetic duality,Nucl. Phys. B459(1996) 455–496, arXiv:hep-th/9510222

  111. [119]

    Kutasov and A

    D. Kutasov and A. Schwimmer,On duality in supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Lett. B354 (1995) 315–321, arXiv:hep-th/9505004

  112. [120]

    Kutasov,A Comment on duality in N=1 supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories,Phys

    D. Kutasov,A Comment on duality in N=1 supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories,Phys. Lett. B351(1995) 230–234, arXiv:hep-th/9503086

  113. [121]

    K. A. Intriligator,New RG fixed points and duality in supersymmetric SP(N(c)) and SO(N(c)) gauge theories,Nucl. Phys. B448(1995) 187–198, arXiv:hep-th/9505051

  114. [122]

    D. J. Amit and L. Peliti,ON DANGEROUS IRRELEVANT OPERATORS,Annals Phys.140 (1982) 207

  115. [123]

    R. G. Leigh and M. J. Strassler,Accidental symmetries and N=1 duality in supersymmetric gauge theory,Nucl. Phys. B496(1997) 132–148, arXiv:hep-th/9611020

  116. [124]

    Gorbenko, S

    V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov, and B. Zan,Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs,JHEP10 (2018) 108, arXiv:1807.11512 [hep-th]

  117. [125]

    Gukov,RG Flows and Bifurcations,Nucl

    S. Gukov,RG Flows and Bifurcations,Nucl. Phys. B 919(2017) 583–638, arXiv:1608.06638 [hep-th]

  118. [126]

    Buican and A

    M. Buican and A. Gromov,Anyonic Chains, Topological Defects, and Conformal Field Theory, Commun. Math. Phys.356(2017) 1017–1056, arXiv:1701.02800 [hep-th]

  119. [127]

    Nakayama and T

    Y. Nakayama and T. Tanaka,Infinitely many new renormalization group flows between Virasoro minimal models from non-invertible symmetries,JHEP11 (2024) 137, arXiv:2407.21353 [hep-th]

  120. [128]

    This incompatibility withC-linear structure in category theories is fundamental in studying boundary conditions and defects, but this is sometimes inconvenient in studyingoperatorsand theiralgebra

  121. [129]

    J. L. Cardy,Scaling and renormalization in statistical physics. 1996

  122. [130]

    After constructing a series of homomorphisms or monoidal functors, we noticed that the connection between homomorphisms and the massless RGs is not straightforward. There exist many homomorphisms by fixing a UV and IR theory, and these homomorphisms should be interpreted as in...

  123. [131]

    M. R. Gaberdiel and L. Merkens,Defects inN= 1 minimal models and RG flows,JHEP05(2026) 018, arXiv:2601.03879 [hep-th]

  124. [132]

    Benedetti, P

    V. Benedetti, P. Fendley, and J. M. Magan, Non-invertible symmetries and selection rules for RG flows of coset models,arXiv:2603.09591 [hep-th]

  125. [133]

    Fukusumi and S

    Y. Fukusumi and S. Nakashiba,Characterizing gapped phases by smeared boundary conformal field theories: Duality in unusual ordering with spontaneously broken generalized symmetries,arXiv:2605.07734 [hep-th]

  126. [134]

    Graham and G

    K. Graham and G. M. T. Watts,Defect lines and boundary flows,JHEP04(2004) 019, arXiv:hep-th/0306167

  127. [135]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Senechal, Conformal Field Theory. Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997

  128. [136]

    P. H. Ginsparg,APPLIED CONFORMAL FIELD THEORY,inLes Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics: Fields, Strings, Critical Phenomena. 9, 1988. arXiv:hep-th/9108028

  129. [137]

    Ribault,Minimal lectures on two-dimensional conformal field theory,SciPost Phys

    S. Ribault,Minimal lectures on two-dimensional conformal field theory,SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes1 (2018) 1, arXiv:1609.09523 [hep-th]

  130. [138]

    T. D. Schultz, D. C. Mattis, and E. H. Lieb, Two-Dimensional Ising Model as a Soluble Problem of Many Fermions,Rev. Mod. Phys.36(1964) 856–871

  131. [139]

    Recknagel and V

    A. Recknagel and V. Schomerus,Boundary Conformal Field Theory and the Worldsheet Approach to D-Branes. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 11, 2013

  132. [140]

    Northe,Young Researchers School 2024 Maynooth: Lectures on CFT, BCFT and DCFT, arXiv:2411.03381 [hep-th]

    C. Northe,Young Researchers School 2024 Maynooth: Lectures on CFT, BCFT and DCFT, arXiv:2411.03381 [hep-th]

  133. [141]

    E. H. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis,Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain,Annals Phys.16 (1961) 407–466

  134. [142]

    Yao, C.-T

    Y. Yao, C.-T. Hsieh, and M. Oshikawa,Anomaly matching and symmetry-protected critical phases in SU(N)spin systems in 1+1 dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 180201, arXiv:1805.06885 [cond-mat.str-el]

  135. [143]

    S. C. Furuya and M. Oshikawa,Symmetry Protection of Critical Phases and a Global Anomaly in1 + 1 Dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 021601, arXiv:1503.07292 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

  136. [144]

    Lecheminant,Massless renormalization group flow in SU(N)k perturbed conformal field theory,Nucl

    P. Lecheminant,Massless renormalization group flow in SU(N)k perturbed conformal field theory,Nucl. Phys. B901(2015) 510–525, arXiv:1509.01680 [cond-mat.str-el]

  137. [145]

    Numasawa and S

    T. Numasawa and S. Yamaguch,Mixed Global Anomalies and Boundary Conformal Field Theories, JHEP11(2018) 202, arXiv:1712.09361 [hep-th]

  138. [146]

    F. D. M. Haldane,Nonlinear field theory of large spin Heisenberg antiferromagnets. Semiclassically quantized solitons of the one-dimensional easy Axis Neel state, Phys. Rev. Lett.50(1983) 1153–1156

  139. [147]

    Tanizaki and T

    Y. Tanizaki and T. Sulejmanpasic,Anomaly and global inconsistency matching:θ-angles,SU(3)/U(1) 2 nonlinear sigma model,SU(3)chains and its generalizations,Phys. Rev. B98(2018) 115126, arXiv:1805.11423 [cond-mat.str-el]

  140. [148]

    Wess and B

    J. Wess and B. Zumino,Consequences of anomalous Ward identities,Phys. Lett. B37(1971) 95–97

  141. [149]

    F. D. M. Haldane,Luttinger liquid theory of one-dimensional quantum fluids. I. Properties of the Luttinger model and their extension to the general 1D interacting spinless Fermi gas,J. Phys. C14(1981) 24 2585–2609

  142. [150]

    Pollmann, E

    F. Pollmann, E. Berg, A. M. Turner, and M. Oshikawa, Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems,Phys. Rev. B 85(2012) 075125, arXiv:0909.4059 [cond-mat.str-el]

  143. [151]

    Wamer, M

    K. Wamer, M. Lajkó, F. Mila, and I. Affleck, Generalization of the Haldane conjecture to SU(n) chains,Nucl. Phys. B952(2020) 114932, arXiv:1910.08196 [cond-mat.str-el]

  144. [152]

    Oshikawa,Hiddenz 2 ×z 2 symmetry in quantum spin chains with arbitrary integer spin,Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter4(Sep, 1992) 7469

    M. Oshikawa,Hiddenz 2 ×z 2 symmetry in quantum spin chains with arbitrary integer spin,Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter4(Sep, 1992) 7469

  145. [153]

    Pollmann, A

    F. Pollmann, A. M. Turner, E. Berg, and M. Oshikawa,Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension,Phys. Rev. B81(2010) 064439, arXiv:0910.1811 [cond-mat.str-el]

  146. [154]

    G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg,Classical and Quantum Conformal Field Theory,Commun. Math. Phys.123 (1989) 177

  147. [155]

    Scaffidi, D

    T. Scaffidi, D. E. Parker, and R. Vasseur,Gapless Symmetry Protected Topological Order,Phys. Rev. X 7(2017) 041048, arXiv:1705.01557 [cond-mat.str-el]

  148. [156]

    We drop space-time coordinates and spatial integrals to simplify the notations

  149. [157]

    G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg,Naturality in Conformal Field Theory,Nucl. Phys. B313(1989) 16–40

  150. [158]

    V. S. Dotsenko, J. L. Jacobsen, and S. Raoul, Parafermionic theory with the symmetry Z(N), for N odd,Nucl. Phys. B664(2003) 477–511, arXiv:hep-th/0303126

  151. [159]

    G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg,Lectures on RCFT,in Strings ’89, Proceedings of the Trieste Spring School on Superstrings.World Scientific, 1990.http://www. physics.rutgers.edu/~gmoore/LecturesRCFT.pdf

  152. [160]

    Fuchs, I

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert,TFT construction of RCFT correlators 1. Partition functions,Nucl. Phys. B646(2002) 353–497, arXiv:hep-th/0204148

  153. [161]

    V. A. Fateev and A. B. Zamolodchikov,Parafermionic Currents in the Two-Dimensional Conformal Quantum Field Theory and Selfdual Critical Points in Z(n) Invariant Statistical Systems,Sov. Phys. JETP62 (1985) 215–225

  154. [162]

    Konechny and V

    A. Konechny and V. Vergioglou,On local fields invariant under the action of topological defects,JHEP 09(2025) 114, arXiv:2505.04316 [hep-th]

  155. [163]

    V. S. Dotsenko, J. L. Jacobsen, and R. Santachiara, Conformal field theories with Z(N) and Lie algebra symmetries,Phys. Lett. B584(2004) 186–191, arXiv:hep-th/0310102

  156. [164]

    V. S. Dotsenko, J. L. Jacobsen, and R. Santachiara, Parafermionic theory with the symmetry Z(N), for N even,Nucl. Phys. B679(2004) 464–494, arXiv:hep-th/0310131

  157. [165]

    Runkel,Non-local conserved charges from defects in perturbed conformal field theory,J

    I. Runkel,Non-local conserved charges from defects in perturbed conformal field theory,J. Phys. A43(2010) 365206, arXiv:1004.1909 [hep-th]

  158. [166]

    Nivesvivat and S

    R. Nivesvivat and S. Ribault,Fusion rules and structure constants of E-series minimal models,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 163, arXiv:2502.14295 [hep-th]

  159. [167]

    Fuchs,Fusion rules in conformal field theory, Fortsch

    J. Fuchs,Fusion rules in conformal field theory, Fortsch. Phys.42(1994) 1–48, arXiv:hep-th/9306162

  160. [168]

    Rida and T

    A. Rida and T. Sami,The nonchiral fusion rules in rational conformal field theories,Lett. Math. Phys.58 (2001) 239–248, arXiv:hep-th/9907137

  161. [169]

    Rida and T

    A. Rida and T. Sami,Nonchiral fusion rules, structure constants of D(m) minimal models, arXiv:hep-th/9910070

  162. [170]

    D. R. Green, M. Mulligan, and D. Starr,Boundary Entropy Can Increase Under Bulk RG Flow,Nucl. Phys. B798(2008) 491–504, arXiv:0710.4348 [hep-th]

  163. [171]

    However, for our purpose, the detailed data are not necessary

    However, this is not a sufficient condition for fixing the preserved sectors. However, for our purpose, the detailed data are not necessary

  164. [172]

    P. W. Anderson,More Is Different,Science177(1972) 393–396

  165. [173]

    Dorey, A

    P. Dorey, A. Lishman, C. Rim, and R. Tateo, Reflection factors and exact g-functions for purely elastic scattering theories,Nucl. Phys. B744(2006) 239–276, arXiv:hep-th/0512337

  166. [174]

    Fukusumi,Protected edge modes based on the bulk and boundary renormalization group: A relationship between duality and generalized symmetry, arXiv:2312.12887 [hep-th]

    Y. Fukusumi,Protected edge modes based on the bulk and boundary renormalization group: A relationship between duality and generalized symmetry, arXiv:2312.12887 [hep-th]

  167. [175]

    Dorey, C

    P. Dorey, C. Rim, and R. Tateo,Exact g-function flow between conformal field theories,Nucl. Phys. B834 (2010) 485–501, arXiv:0911.4969 [hep-th]

  168. [176]

    Fredenhagen, M

    S. Fredenhagen, M. R. Gaberdiel, and C. Schmidt-Colinet,Bulk flows in Virasoro minimal models with boundaries,J. Phys. A42(2009) 495403, arXiv:0907.2560 [hep-th]

  169. [177]

    Chang, Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang, and X. Yin,Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions,JHEP01(2019) 026, arXiv:1802.04445 [hep-th]

  170. [178]

    Fukusumi and S

    Y. Fukusumi and S. Iino,Open spin chain realization of a topological defect in a one-dimensional Ising model: Boundary and bulk symmetry,Phys. Rev. B 104(2021) 125418, arXiv:2004.04415 [hep-th]

  171. [179]

    Affleck, T

    I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Rigorous Results on Valence Bond Ground States in Antiferromagnets,Phys. Rev. Lett.59(1987) 799

  172. [180]

    Verresen, R

    R. Verresen, R. Thorngren, N. G. Jones, and F. Pollmann,Gapless Topological Phases and Symmetry-Enriched Quantum Criticality,Phys. Rev. X11(2021) 041059, arXiv:1905.06969 [cond-mat.str-el]

  173. [181]

    A. Y. Kitaev,Unpaired Majorana Fermions in Quantum Wires,Phys. Usp.44(2001) 131–136, arXiv:cond-mat/0010440

  174. [182]

    J. L. Cardy,Effect of Boundary Conditions on the Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally 25 Invariant Theories,Nucl. Phys. B275(1986) 200–218

  175. [183]

    Boyle Smith,Boundary States and Anomalous Symmetries of Fermionic Minimal Models, arXiv:2102.02203 [hep-th]

    P. Boyle Smith,Boundary States and Anomalous Symmetries of Fermionic Minimal Models, arXiv:2102.02203 [hep-th]

  176. [184]

    Fukusumi, Y

    Y. Fukusumi, Y. Tachikawa, and Y. Zheng, Fermionization and boundary states in 1+1 dimensions,SciPost Phys.11(2021) 082, arXiv:2103.00746 [hep-th]

  177. [185]

    Ebisu and M

    H. Ebisu and M. Watanabe,Fermionization of conformal boundary states,Phys. Rev. B104(2021) 195124, arXiv:2103.01101 [hep-th]

  178. [186]

    O’Brien and P

    E. O’Brien and P. Fendley,Lattice supersymmetry and order-disorder coexistence in the tricritical Ising model,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 206403, arXiv:1712.06662 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

  179. [187]

    Okada and Y

    M. Okada and Y. Tachikawa,Non-invertible symmetries act locally by quantum operations, arXiv:2403.20062 [hep-th]

  180. [188]

    Grover, D

    T. Grover, D. N. Sheng, and A. Vishwanath,Emergent Space-Time Supersymmetry at the Boundary of a Topological Phase,Science344(2014) 280–283, arXiv:1301.7449 [cond-mat.str-el]

  181. [189]

    Rahmani, X

    A. Rahmani, X. Zhu, M. Franz, and I. Affleck, Emergent Supersymmetry from Strongly Interacting Majorana Zero Modes,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 166401, arXiv:1504.05192 [cond-mat.str-el]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 116, 109901 (2016)]

  182. [190]

    Witten,Global Aspects of Current Algebra,Nucl

    E. Witten,Global Aspects of Current Algebra,Nucl. Phys. B223(1983) 422–432

  183. [191]

    Etingof, S

    P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Tensor categories, vol. 205. American Mathematical Soc., 2015

  184. [192]

    More precisely, we study theC-linear realization of the representation category, but to simplify notation, we do not distinguish the Lie group and representation category

  185. [193]

    The coset decomposition involves more complicated processes coming from the identification (or orbifolding) of (non)simple current. We expect this difficulty will be resolved by extending (i.e., inverse of orbifolding) the underlying theory by the (non)simple current or by rep...

  186. [194]

    Cremmer and B

    E. Cremmer and B. Julia,The N=8 Supergravity Theory. 1. The Lagrangian,Phys. Lett. B80(1978) 48

  187. [195]

    Witten,Nonabelian Bosonization in Two-Dimensions,Commun

    E. Witten,Nonabelian Bosonization in Two-Dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.92(1984) 455–472

  188. [196]

    Bowcock and P

    P. Bowcock and P. Goddard,Coset Constructions and Extended Conformal Algebras,Nucl. Phys. B305 (1988) 685

  189. [197]

    J. J. Sakurai,Theory of strong interactions,Annals Phys.11(1960) 1–48

  190. [198]

    Georgi,Vector Realization of Chiral Symmetry, Nucl

    H. Georgi,Vector Realization of Chiral Symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B331(1990) 311–330

  191. [199]

    Cremmer and B

    E. Cremmer and B. Julia,The SO(8) Supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B159(1979) 141–212

  192. [200]

    Bando, T

    M. Bando, T. Kugo, S. Uehara, K. Yamawaki, and T. Yanagida,Is rho Meson a Dynamical Gauge Boson of Hidden Local Symmetry?,Phys. Rev. Lett.54 (1985) 1215

  193. [201]

    Bando, T

    M. Bando, T. Fujiwara, and K. Yamawaki,Generalized Hidden Local Symmetry and the A1 Meson,Prog. Theor. Phys.79(1988) 1140

  194. [202]

    In this kind of dual group, the level of the WZW model takes negative values, and the central charge also becomes negative

    There exist some canonical relations between a dual groupH c and antichiral oneH. In this kind of dual group, the level of the WZW model takes negative values, and the central charge also becomes negative. Because of this negative sign, the theory has a connection to the antic...

  195. [203]

    Bando, T

    M. Bando, T. Kugo, and K. Yamawaki,Nonlinear Realization and Hidden Local Symmetries,Phys. Rept. 164(1988) 217–314

  196. [204]

    Gannon and M

    T. Gannon and M. A. Walton,On the classification of diagonal coset modular invariants,Commun. Math. Phys.173(1995) 175–198, arXiv:hep-th/9407055

  197. [205]

    Ishikawa and T

    H. Ishikawa and T. Tani,Novel construction of boundary states in coset conformal field theories,Nucl. Phys. B649(2003) 205–242, arXiv:hep-th/0207177

  198. [206]

    D. Seo, T. Lee, and G. Y. Cho,A Unified Categorical Description of Quantum Hall Hierarchy and Anyon Superconductivity,arXiv:2602.03848 [cond-mat.str-el]

  199. [207]

    Cordova and D

    C. Cordova and D. García-Sepúlveda,Non-Invertible Anyon Condensation and Level-Rank Dualities, arXiv:2312.16317 [hep-th]

  200. [208]

    We have included the information of braiding or conformal spin to the theory, we distinguished the UV and IR fusion ring by the prime symbol ’

  201. [209]

    Kong and H

    L. Kong and H. Zheng,A mathematical theory of gapless edges of 2d topological orders. Part II,Nucl. Phys. B966(2021) 115384, arXiv:1912.01760 [cond-mat.str-el]

  202. [210]

    Gannon and B

    T. Gannon and B. C. Rayhaun,Hypergroup Symmetry in Relative Quantum Field Theories and Chiral Algebras,arXiv:2606.05279 [hep-th]

  203. [211]

    Etingof, D

    P. Etingof, D. Nikshych, V. Ostrik, and w. a. a. b. E. Meir,Fusion categories and homotopy theory, arXiv:0909.3140 [math.QA]

  204. [212]

    C. L. Douglas, C. J. Schommer-Pries, and N. Snyder, Dualizable tensor categories,Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society(2013)

  205. [213]

    C. L. Douglas, C. J. Schommer-Pries, and N. Snyder, The balanced tensor product of module categories, Kyoto Journal of Mathematics(2014)

  206. [214]

    Schwarz,Field theories with no local conservation of the electric charge,Nuclear Physics B208(1982) 141–158

    A. Schwarz,Field theories with no local conservation of the electric charge,Nuclear Physics B208(1982) 141–158. 26

  207. [215]

    Wei and Y

    P. Wei and Y. Zheng,Non-invertible Symmetries in Weyl Fermions, and Applications to Fermion-Boundary Scattering Problem,arXiv:2605.19363 [hep-th]

  208. [216]

    Cordova, D

    C. Cordova, D. García-Sepúlveda, and J. A. Harvey, Generalized Level-Rank Duality, Holomorphic Conformal Field Theory, and Non-Invertible Anyon Condensation,arXiv:2512.24419 [hep-th]

  209. [217]

    Bourgine and Y

    J.-E. Bourgine and Y. Matsuo,Calogero model for the non-Abelian quantum Hall effect,Phys. Rev. B109 (2024) 155158, arXiv:2401.03087 [hep-th]

  210. [218]

    J. A. Harvey, Y. Hu, and Y. Wu,Galois Symmetry Induced by Hecke Relations in Rational Conformal Field Theory and Associated Modular Tensor Categories,J. Phys. A53(2020) 334003, arXiv:1912.11955 [hep-th]

  211. [219]

    Schwarz and Y

    A. Schwarz and Y. Tyupkin,Grand unification and mirror particles,Nuclear Physics B209(1982) 427–432

  212. [220]

    J. S. Schwinger,The Theory of quantized fields. 1., Phys. Rev.82(1951) 914–927

  213. [221]

    Pauli,The Connection Between Spin and Statistics,Phys

    W. Pauli,The Connection Between Spin and Statistics,Phys. Rev.58(1940) 716–722

  214. [222]

    Georgiou and K

    G. Georgiou and K. Sfetsos,The most general λ-deformation of CFTs and integrability,JHEP03 (2019) 094, arXiv:1812.04033 [hep-th]

  215. [223]

    LeClair,Chiral stabilization of the renormalization group for flavor and color anisotropic current interactions,Phys

    A. LeClair,Chiral stabilization of the renormalization group for flavor and color anisotropic current interactions,Phys. Lett. B519(2001) 183–187, arXiv:hep-th/0105092

  216. [224]

    Georgiou and K

    G. Georgiou and K. Sfetsos,Integrable flows between exact CFTs,JHEP11(2017) 078, arXiv:1707.05149 [hep-th]

  217. [225]

    Sfetsos and K

    K. Sfetsos and K. Siampos,Integrable deformations of theG k1 ×G k2 /Gk1+k2 coset CFTs,Nucl. Phys. B927 (2018) 124–139, arXiv:1710.02515 [hep-th]

  218. [226]

    Affleck and A

    I. Affleck and A. W. W. Ludwig,The Kondo effect, conformal field theory and fusion rules,Nucl. Phys. B 352(1991) 849–862

  219. [227]

    Quella, I

    T. Quella, I. Runkel, and G. M. T. Watts,Reflection and transmission for conformal defects,JHEP04 (2007) 095, arXiv:hep-th/0611296

  220. [228]

    Kimura and M

    T. Kimura and M. Murata,Current Reflection and Transmission at Conformal Defects: Applying BCFT to Transport Process,Nucl. Phys. B885(2014) 266–279, arXiv:1402.6705 [hep-th]

  221. [229]

    Kimura and M

    T. Kimura and M. Murata,Transport Process in Multi-Junctions of Quantum Systems,JHEP07 (2015) 072, arXiv:1505.05275 [hep-th]

  222. [230]

    Fendley, A

    P. Fendley, A. W. W. Ludwig, and H. Saleur,Exact nonequilibrium transport through point contacts in quantum wires and fractional quantum hall devices, Physical Review B52(Sep, 1995) 8934–8950

  223. [231]

    C. L. Kane and M. P. A. Fisher,Transport in a one-channel Luttinger liquid,Phys. Rev. Lett.68 (1992) 1220

  224. [232]

    C. L. Kane and M. P. A. Fisher,Transmission through barriers and resonant tunneling in an interacting one-dimensional electron gas,Phys. Rev. B46(1992) 15233–15262

  225. [233]

    Affleck,Conformal Field Theory Approach to the Kondo Effect,Acta Phys

    I. Affleck,Conformal Field Theory Approach to the Kondo Effect,Acta Phys. Polon. B26(1995) 1869–1932, arXiv:cond-mat/9512099

  226. [234]

    R. R. Caldwell,A Phantom menace?,Phys. Lett. B 545(2002) 23–29, arXiv:astro-ph/9908168

  227. [235]

    Oshikawa and I

    M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck,Defect lines in the ising model and boundary states on orbifolds,Phys. Rev. Lett.77(Sep, 1996) 2604–2607

  228. [236]

    Saleur,Lectures on nonperturbative field theory and quantum impurity problems, arXiv:cond-mat/9812110

    H. Saleur,Lectures on nonperturbative field theory and quantum impurity problems, arXiv:cond-mat/9812110

  229. [237]

    Affleck,Quantum impurity problems in condensed matter physics,2009

    I. Affleck,Quantum impurity problems in condensed matter physics,2009. https://arxiv.org/abs/0809.3474

  230. [238]

    B. L. Feigin and D. B. Fuks,Invariant skew symmetric differential operators on the line and verma modules over the Virasoro algebra,Funct. Anal. Appl.16 (1982) 114–126

  231. [239]

    Hogan and C

    G. Hogan and C. Webb,Pre-ionization and discharge breakdown in the copper vapour laser: the phantom current,Optics Communications117(1995) 570–579

  232. [240]

    V. S. Dotsenko and V. A. Fateev,Four Point Correlation Functions and the Operator Algebra in the Two-Dimensional Conformal Invariant Theories with the Central Charge c<1,Nucl. Phys. B251(1985) 691–734

  233. [241]

    V. S. Dotsenko and V. A. Fateev,Conformal Algebra and Multipoint Correlation Functions in Two-Dimensional Statistical Models,Nucl. Phys. B 240(1984) 312

  234. [242]

    However, as a domain wall between TQFTs, it is well-defined

    It should be remarked that the charge preservation is broken in charged domain walls, and there exists some subtlety in interpreting the phenomena in RGs. However, as a domain wall between TQFTs, it is well-defined

  235. [243]

    Bernard, B

    D. Bernard, B. Doyon, and J. Viti,Non-Equilibrium Conformal Field Theories with Impurities,J. Phys. A 48(2015) 05FT01, arXiv:1411.0470 [math-ph]

  236. [244]

    C. G. Callan, Jr. and J. A. Harvey,Anomalies and Fermion Zero Modes on Strings and Domain Walls, Nucl. Phys. B250(1985) 427–436

  237. [245]

    G. Yue, A. Bai, L. Wu, and T. Lan,Pro-Tensor Network,arXiv:2605.06661 [cond-mat.str-el]

  238. [246]

    Kikuchi,Monotonicities of Tanaka-Nakayama flows, arXiv:2503.04587 [hep-th]

    K. Kikuchi,Monotonicities of Tanaka-Nakayama flows, arXiv:2503.04587 [hep-th]

  239. [247]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov,Irreversibility of the Flux of the Renormalization Group in a 2D Field Theory,JETP Lett.43(1986) 730–732

  240. [248]

    More or less, both cascades and the first-order transition seem unconventional when applying CFTs, and further clarification by other methods is necessary

    with a remark on theQ-state Potts models with Q >4. More or less, both cascades and the first-order transition seem unconventional when applying CFTs, and further clarification by other methods is necessary. at the continuous RG trajectory by the relevant pertur- bation. Hence...

  241. [249]

    Moudgalya, B

    S. Moudgalya, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Quantum many-body scars and Hilbert space fragmentation: a review of exact results,Rept. Prog. Phys.85(2022) 086501, arXiv:2109.00548 [cond-mat.str-el]

  242. [250]

    Matsui,Exactly solvable subspaces of nonintegrable spin chains with boundaries and quasiparticle interactions,Physical Review B109(Mar., 2024)

    C. Matsui,Exactly solvable subspaces of nonintegrable spin chains with boundaries and quasiparticle interactions,Physical Review B109(Mar., 2024)

  243. [251]

    G. E. Andrews, R. J. Baxter, and P. J. Forrester,Eight vertex SOS model and generalized Rogers-Ramanujan type identities,J. Statist. Phys.35(1984) 193–266

  244. [252]

    D. A. Huse,Exact exponents for infinitely many new multicritical points,Phys. Rev. B30(1984) 3908–3915

  245. [253]

    Kuniba and T

    A. Kuniba and T. Nakanishi,Fusion RSOS models and rational coset models,Lect. Notes Math.1510(1992) 303–311

  246. [254]

    C. H. O. Chui, C. Mercat, W. P. Orrick, and P. A. Pearce,Integrable lattice realizations of conformal twisted boundary conditions,Phys. Lett. B517(2001) 429–435, arXiv:hep-th/0106182

  247. [255]

    C. H. O. Chui, C. Mercat, and P. A. Pearce,Integrable and conformal twisted boundary conditions for sl(2) A-D-E lattice models,J. Phys. A36(2003) 2623–2662, arXiv:hep-th/0210301

  248. [256]

    Aasen, P

    D. Aasen, P. Fendley, and R. S. K. Mong,Topological Defects on the Lattice: Dualities and Degeneracies, arXiv:2008.08598 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

  249. [257]

    P. A. Pearce, J. Heymann, and T. Quella,Unitary and Nonunitary A-D-E minimal models: Coset graph fusion algebras, defects, entropies, SREEs and 27 dilogarithm identities,arXiv:2512.21808 [hep-th]

  250. [258]

    J. I. Cirac, D. Perez-Garcia, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete,Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems,Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) 045003, arXiv:2011.12127 [quant-ph]

  251. [259]

    Vancraeynest-De Cuiper, W

    B. Vancraeynest-De Cuiper, W. Wiesiolek, and F. Verstraete,Les Houches Lecture Notes on Tensor Networks,arXiv:2512.24390 [cond-mat.str-el]

  252. [260]

    Konechny,RG boundaries and Cardy’s variational ansatz for multiple perturbations,JHEP11(2023) 004, arXiv:2306.13719 [hep-th]

    A. Konechny,RG boundaries and Cardy’s variational ansatz for multiple perturbations,JHEP11(2023) 004, arXiv:2306.13719 [hep-th]

  253. [261]

    Delfino and G

    G. Delfino and G. Mussardo,Nonintegrable aspects of the multifrequency Sine-Gordon model,Nucl. Phys. B 516(1998) 675–703, arXiv:hep-th/9709028

  254. [262]

    G. Z. Toth,A Nonperturbative study of phase transitions in the multi-frequency sine-Gordon model, J. Phys. A37(2004) 9631–9650, arXiv:hep-th/0406139

  255. [263]

    Fukusumi and O

    Y. Fukusumi and O. S. Barišić,Kubo’s response theory and bosonization with a background gauge field and irrelevant perturbations,Phys. Rev. B104(2021) 235145, arXiv:2106.07339 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

  256. [264]

    Ando and K

    T. Ando and K. Ohmori,Symmetry Spans and Enforced Gaplessness, arXiv:2602.11696 [cond-mat.str-el]

  257. [265]

    Altschuler,Quantum Equivalence of Coset Space Models,Nucl

    D. Altschuler,Quantum Equivalence of Coset Space Models,Nucl. Phys. B313(1989) 293

  258. [266]

    Bouwknegt and K

    P. Bouwknegt and K. Schoutens,W symmetry in conformal field theory,Phys. Rept.223(1993) 183–276, arXiv:hep-th/9210010

  259. [267]

    We kindly remind again that we studied the dangerously irrelevant perturbation in quantum field theory, but it is different from that in statistical physics

  260. [268]

    E. P. Verlinde,Fusion Rules and Modular Transformations in 2D Conformal Field Theory,Nucl. Phys. B300(1988) 360–376

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.