Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 78 references

Robust spin pseudogap and spin-charge separation in the $\sigma t$-$J$ model

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A sign flip in the t-J model makes both its spin pseudogap and spin-ordering transition survive doping up to 20 percent, and a symmetry-guided mean-field theory explains why.

desk verdict The finite-T results and PSG mean field are solid and worth refereeing; the robust-BKT-upon-doping claim needs more numerical control before it is believable. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09689 v1 pith:75WLVRNS submitted 2026-08-10 cond-mat.str-el

Zheng-Yuan Yue , Jia-Xin Zhang , Zheng-Cheng Gu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords sigmat-JmodelspinpseudogapBerezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thoulesstransitiontensornetworkrenormalizationprojectivesymmetrygroupslave-fermionmean-fieldtheoryspin-chargeseparationphasestring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the $\sigma t$-$J$ model—an ordinary $t$-$J$ model with the sign of the spin-down hopping flipped, which removes the phase-string interference between doped holes and the spin background—has a spin pseudogap that survives hole doping in a way the $t$-$J$ model's does not. The uniform spin susceptibility develops a maximum at $T^*$ near $0.9J$ and the specific heat a broad peak, and both remain nearly unchanged for dopings from about $0.05$ to $0.20$. Tensor network renormalization gives evidence that the spin sector undergoes a Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition at $T_{\mathrm{BKT}}$ near $0.33J$ over the same doping range, while the doped holes enhance rather than suppress the antiferromagnetic correlations in the $xy$ spin plane. A slave-fermion mean-field theory, whose ansatz is selected from projective symmetry group classes using the numerically observed hopping and pairing correlations, explains all three features: $T^*$ is the temperature at which short-range singlet pairing dissolves, and doping collapses the magnetic order-parameter manifold from a sphere to a circle, making the BKT transition possible. The work matters because it isolates which hole-spin interference effects are essential to pseudogap physics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the sign-flipped hopping term $H_{\sigma t}$ together with the slave-fermion ansatz it dictates. The $\sigma t$ term flips the spin-down hopping sign; combined with a staggered sublattice factor it forms an exact composite $Z_2$ symmetry that enforces opposite-sign nearest-neighbor spinon hopping for the two spin species. The projective symmetry group analysis leaves 32 algebraic classes, and the coexistence of nearest-neighbor hopping and pairing with next-nearest-neighbor hopping, as found numerically, selects the zero-flux $Z_2(0,0)$ class, whose mean-field pattern is uniform purely imaginary hopping and pairing on all nearest-neighbor bonds. In the self-consistent solution the spinons condense at momenta $\pm Q$ with locked amplitudes, producing staggered magnetization in the $xy$ plane whose phase parametrizes a circle, so the doped system has the $U(1)$ order-parameter manifold needed for a BKT transition, while at zero doping both Nambu sectors condense and the manifold becomes a sphere with no finite-temperature transition. The same theory sets $T^*$ as the temperature at which the RVB pairing amplitude vanishes, which is why that scale is controlled by $J$.

What would settle it

Re-run the loop-TNR analysis with substantially larger bond dimensions or a truncation-free thermal TNR scheme and check whether the $c\approx 1$ plateau persists and whether the spin correlation length $\xi(T)$ shows the expected BKT divergence as $T$ approaches $T_{\mathrm{BKT}}$; if the plateau disappears or $\xi$ saturates instead of diverging, the BKT claim collapses. A separate decisive check is to measure the universal BKT jump in the spin stiffness (helicity modulus) of the $\sigma t$-$J$ model in the doping range $0.05\lesssim\delta\lesssim 0.15$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the finite-temperature spin physics of the $\sigma t$-$J$ model is robust against hole doping, in contrast to the $t$-$J$ model and its easy-plane variants. Using finite-temperature iPEPS and loop-TNR, it finds a spin-susceptibility maximum at $T^*$ close to $0.9J$ and a broad specific-heat peak that shift only weakly for $0.05\lesssim\delta\lesssim 0.20$, alongside a stable $c\approx 1$ compactified-boson regime in the renormalization-group flow that it interprets as a BKT transition at $T_{\mathrm{BKT}}\approx 0.33J$ in the $U(1)$-symmetric spin sector. Three-point conditional spin correlations show that holes suppress $z$-axis correlations but strengthen $xy$-plane antiferromagnetic correlations, so the spin background is preserved and even reinforced. The authors' slave-fermion mean-field theory, with fermionic holons and Schwinger-boson spinons, uses the projective symmetry group to fix the allowed ansatz and the numerical correlations to select the zero-flux $Z_2(0,0)$ class; its self-consistent solution gives a holon Fermi pocket of area $\delta$ times the Brillouin zone, spinon condensation at momenta $\pm Q$ producing staggered $xy$ magnetization whose moment grows under dilute doping, a $U(1)$ order-parameter manifold, and an RVB pairing amplitude that vanishes at $T^*$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the loop-TNR flow, run with the tensor bond dimension truncated from 144 to 48 and with conformal data read off after ten coarse-graining steps, faithfully reveals the true phase transition, so the stable scale-invariant regime is a genuine Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition rather than an artifact of the truncation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The spin pseudogap of a doped Mott antiferromagnet can be a two-scale phenomenon: a crossover at $T^*\approx J$ where short-range singlet correlations develop, and a genuine BKT transition at $T_{\mathrm{BKT}}\approx 0.33J$ below which only quasi-long-range $xy$-plane antiferromagnetism survives.
  • Doping does not inevitably destroy the spin background: in the $\sigma t$-$J$ model, holes increase the $xy$ component of the spin correlations, so the susceptibility peak and the BKT temperature remain near $0.9J$ and $0.33J$ up to $\delta\approx 0.20$.
  • The BKT transition is a spin-sector transition, not a superconducting one, because the fixed-point tensor network becomes purely bosonic and the staggered spin correlation exponent tends toward $\eta=1/4$ rather than toward an Ornstein-Zernike value.
  • The slave-fermion mean-field theory predicts a Fermi-liquid-like electron state: hole pockets of area $\delta\times A_{\mathrm{BZ}}$ shifted by the spinon condensation momenta, coexisting with in-plane antiferromagnetism.
  • Easy-plane anisotropy alone cannot explain the robustness, since the $t$-$J$ model under a Zeeman field and the $t$-XX model still show strongly doping-dependent $T^*$ and $T_{\mathrm{BKT}}$; suppressing the phase-string interference is the decisive ingredient.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not compute the electron spectral function; if its spin-charge-separation picture holds, above $T_{\mathrm{BKT}}$ the spinon condensate loses phase coherence and the spectral weight of the composite electron should be suppressed, producing a spectroscopic pseudogap that could be searched for in future tensor-network calculations.
  • The order-parameter manifold argument predicts a universal BKT jump in the spin-sector helicity modulus (spin stiffness) at $T_{\mathrm{BKT}}$; measuring this jump at $\delta\approx 0.12$ would give an independent test that the paper does not perform.
  • The PSG-selection procedure—using numerically determined bond correlations to narrow the algebraic PSG classes to a single ansatz—is a general recipe that could be applied to other strongly correlated models where parton mean-field theories are underdetermined by symmetry alone.
  • Because $T^*$ is controlled purely by $J$ in the mean-field theory, varying the exchange coupling while keeping $t/J$ fixed should move $T^*$ proportionally; a quantitative comparison of susceptibility curves across $J$ values would directly test the mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the finite-temperature properties of the σt-J model, a t-J variant with spin-dependent hopping designed to eliminate the phase-string sign frustration, using finite-temperature iPEPS/iPEPO methods (NTU) and loop-TNR. It reports a spin susceptibility maximum at T*≈0.9J and a broad specific-heat peak, and interprets a low-temperature c≈1 compactified-boson regime found by loop-TNR as a spin-sector BKT transition at T_BKT≈0.33J. A central claim is that both scales remain nearly doping independent for 0.05≲δ≲0.15, in contrast to the t-J model and its easy-plane variants, and that doped holes enhance xy-plane antiferromagnetic correlations. The paper then constructs a slave-fermion mean-field theory, with the PSG class selected from zero-temperature correlation data of Ref. [22], and shows that self-consistent solutions yield doping-enhanced in-plane order, a U(1) order-parameter manifold consistent with BKT physics, and a pseudogap-like magnetic response governed by the RVB pairing scale.

Significance. If the numerical identification holds, the σt-J model is a valuable controlled companion to the t-J model: it removes the phase-string interference while retaining pseudogap-like thermodynamics, and it admits a concrete slave-fermion mean-field theory whose parameters are solved self-consistently rather than fitted. The paper is commendably explicit about its algorithmic setup, including fermionic tensor conventions, the NTU environment, bond dimensions, and the limitation that the data are not high-precision. The Appendix A benchmarks against the XXZ model and the Heisenberg transient flow are useful checks on the loop-TNR machinery. However, the headline BKT claim currently rests on heavily truncated tensor-network data without convergence checks or error bars, so the significance of the paper is conditional on strengthening this evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III C, Figs. 6–8, Eq. (23), Appendix A] The BKT identification is the load-bearing step for the claim that T_BKT≈0.33 is robust upon doping, but it currently rests on truncated tensor-network data without convergence checks. The input iPEPO is obtained with D=12 and then projected from D²=144 to D_pre=48 via Eq. (16); loop-TNR is run at D_TNR=24, and the c≈1 plateau and compactified-boson spectrum are read at RG step 10 (Figs. 6–7), i.e., over only about five RG steps. No D_TNR or D_pre dependence is reported, and no error bars are given for c, R, or the scaling dimensions. The Appendix A benchmark is the pure XXZ model, which validates the loop-TNR machinery for a bosonic model but does not test the projector truncation in a doped fermionic model. The independent check in Eq. (23) fits η over r=2–7 and does not resolve the expected ξ divergence near T_BKT (Fig. 8). Because a truncated U(1)-symmetric tensor network can show an extended c≈1 window even when the true transition temperature is shifted, I ask for a helicity-modulus/stiffness measurement or an equivalent universal-jump diagnostic, plus at least one convergence test (e.g., D_TNR=32 and D_pre=64 at δ=0.12), before T_BKT≈0.33 and its doping robustness can be considered established.
  2. [Section III B, Fig. 4] The weak-doping-dependence claim for T* is quantitative, but the susceptibility data are taken at a single bond dimension D=12 with probe field h=0.1, and T* is extracted from fourth-order polynomial fits and numerical derivatives without uncertainty estimates. The paper itself states in Section III that the data 'should not be regarded as a high-precision determination.' Because T*≈0.9 with only a mild decrease at δ=0.20 is one of the two headline scales, I request at least one D-convergence check (e.g., D=16 at δ=0.10 and 0.15) and an h→0 check at one doping to confirm that the maximum in χ is not a truncation artifact.
  3. [Section IV A and IV B] The mean-field ansatz is selected using zero-temperature hopping and pairing correlations from Ref. [22], whose author list overlaps with that of this manuscript, and the same numerical family is then presented as evidence for the resulting mean-field theory. This is not a fitting circularity—κ, χ, and Δ are solved self-consistently, and no finite-T data are used as input—but it does weaken the claim of independent confirmation. Please state this dependence explicitly and, where feasible, test the selected Z2(0,0) ansatz against an independent ground-state method (e.g., DMRG on cylinders) for the σt-J model.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'provides strong evidences' should be 'provides strong evidence.'
  2. [Section III C] The sentence introducing Fig. 7 contains a typesetting artifact ('theσt-JRG flow'); similar missing spaces appear around 'σt-Jmodel' in several places and should be corrected.
  3. [Figure 7 caption] The statement that 'R is the compactification radius obtained from the lowest nonzero Δ' should specify which lowest nonzero scaling dimension is used and how the modular parameter τ is fixed in the fits.
  4. [Section IV B] The mean-field calculation sets t=1 as the energy unit while the numerical simulations use t=2, J=1; please state the conversion explicitly so the mean-field T*/J can be compared directly with Fig. 4.
  5. [Section II C] The fourth-order polynomial fitting used to convert observables from fixed chemical potential to fixed doping is described, but no fit-quality measure (e.g., residuals or number of μ points) is reported; adding this would help assess the T* extraction.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the finite-T predictions are self-contained iPEPS/loop-TNR results; only a mild self-citation appears in the PSG ansatz selection.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section IV A, 'Projective symmetry group analysis and mean-field ansatz']
    "Previous tensor-network results for the σt-J model found that the NN hopping and pairing correlations, together with the NNN hopping for each spin species, are all nonzero [22]. These observations restrict the PSG directly through Table I."

    The mean-field ansatz is selected using ground-state correlation data from Ref. [22], whose author list overlaps the present paper (Zheng, Zhang, Yue, Gu). This is the one self-referential step in the derivation chain: the same iPEPS numerical family that motivated the PSG choice is later cited as evidence for the physics the ansatz explains. However, it is not a definitional reduction: the finite-temperature observables (χ maximum at T*, c≈1 loop-TNR plateau at T_BKT) are computed in this paper, not imported from [22], and κ, χ, Δ are solved self-consistently from Eqs. (40a)-(40e) rather than fitted to those observables. The self-citation is therefore mild and not load-bearing for the central finite-T claims.

full rationale

The central finite-temperature claims (T* ≈ 0.9J with weak doping dependence, T_BKT ≈ 0.33J, doping-enhanced xy-plane antiferromagnetism) are direct iPEPS/CTMRG and loop-TNR computations in Section III, benchmarked against the pure XXZ BKT transition in Appendix A and the known transient Heisenberg flow. The slave-fermion mean-field theory in Section IV is not fitted to these results: its parameters are fixed by self-consistency equations (40a)-(40e), and its T* is identified with the self-consistently vanishing RVB pairing amplitude, not with the numerical susceptibility maximum. The PSG selection in Section IV A does use correlation data from Ref. [22] with overlapping authorship, but this constrains only the zero-temperature ansatz; the doping robustness of T* and T_BKT is established by the present paper's own numerical data and would stand even if the PSG choice were altered, as the loop-TNR and susceptibility analyses are independent of the mean-field theory. The paper's stated bond-dimension limitations (D=12, D_pre=48, D_TNR=24; 'the present data should not be regarded as a high-precision determination') are accuracy concerns, not circularity. No equation-level reduction of a prediction to an input was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central finite-T claims do not introduce free parameters fitted to the target data: the mean-field amplitudes κ, χ, and Δ are self-consistent saddle-point values, and the PSG selection uses only qualitative nonzero or sign information from Ref. [22]. The assumptions listed above are the load-bearing idealizations: parton mean-field decoupling, a uniform checkerboard thermal ansatz, PSG enumeration, TNR CFT extraction, the Mermin-Wagner constraint, and the exact sign cancellation. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced; the bosonic spinon and fermionic holon are standard slave-fermion degrees of freedom.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The slave-fermion decomposition c̃_iσ = b_iσ f_i† with the no-double-occupancy constraint and a self-consistent mean-field decoupling captures the σt-J model's low-energy physics.
    Introduced in Section IV, Eq. (24); this postulates spin-charge separation, precisely the phenomenon the paper aims to establish.
  • domain assumption The thermal state is well approximated by a checkerboard-uniform iPEPS/iPEPO with two independent tensors, excluding stripe or charge-density-wave modulations.
    Stated in Section II B and motivated by prior ground-state work [18,22]; a finite-T stripe instability would invalidate the phase diagrams in Figs. 4-6.
  • standard math The 32 algebraic PSGs of the square-lattice space group with IGG=Z2 and without a time-reversal generator exhaust the symmetric spinon ansätze relevant to σt-J.
    Based on the PSG framework of Wen [40] and Yang-Wang [43]; the lack of time-reversal is proved in Appendix B 1 c.
  • domain assumption Central charges and scaling dimensions extracted from loop-TNR transfer matrices via Eq. (17) faithfully represent the CFT data of the thermal transition at the used truncation.
    Used in Section III C; benchmarked on XXZ in Appendix A, but the doped-fermion flows are less stable and no error bars are given.
  • standard math Mermin-Wagner theorem permits only quasi-long-range spin order in 2D at finite temperature, so the c=1 critical region must be interpreted as BKT rather than conventional symmetry breaking.
    Invoked in Section III; consistent with the order-parameter manifold analysis in Section IV B.
  • domain assumption The exact sign-cancellation result τ_C = (−1)^{N_h^ex} for the σt-J partition function is valid.
    Quoted from Ref. [18] in Section V; the paper does not re-derive it, and this sign structure is the physical mechanism invoked for robustness.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Robust spin pseudogap and spin-charge separation in the $\sigma t$-$J$ model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/75WLVRNS

@misc{pith2026260809689,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Robust spin pseudogap and spin-charge separation in the $\sigma t$-$J$ model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/75WLVRNS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09689}
}
abstract

The $\sigma t$-$J$ model, obtained from the usual $t$-$J$ model by flipping the sign of the spin-down hopping term, has been proposed to eliminate the strong interference between doped holes and the spin background, known as the phase string effect. In this work, we investigate the finite-temperature properties of the $\sigma t$-$J$ model using infinite projected entangled-pair state (iPEPS) algorithms, in comparison with the $t$-$J$ model and its easy-plane variants. We show that these models share similar spin-pseudogap thermodynamics, with a maximum in the spin susceptibility at $T^* \sim J$ and a broad specific-heat peak. Tensor network renormalization (TNR) further provides strong evidences for a Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) transition in the spin sector of the $\sigma t$-$J$ model at a lower temperature $T_\text{BKT} < T^*$ due to its reduced $\mathrm{U}(1)$ spin-rotation symmetry. Crucially, in contrast to the $t$-$J$ model and to its easy-plane variants that also exhibit BKT transitions, these signatures remain robust upon doping: the doped holes preserve and even enhance the antiferromagnetic correlations in the $xy$ spin plane, leading to a weak doping dependence of both $T^*$ and $T_\text{BKT}$. Finally, we develop a slave-fermion mean-field theory for the $\sigma t$-$J$ model, whose projective symmetry group (PSG) is selected based on numerically determined hopping and pairing correlations, and show that it explains the robust spin pseudogap upon doping.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.09689 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) A transfer matrix along the vertical direction consisting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The 3P conditional correlators Cab|i involving NN or NNN spins at temperature β = 3 and doping δ ≈ 0.078 in σt-J and t-J models. i is the center site, while (a, b) is an NN or NNN bond in the 3 × 3 window not overlapping with i. adding a uniform Zeeman field along the z axis to the t-J model, Hz h = −h X i S z i . (19) As long as the uniform magnetization mz = P i ⟨S z i ⟩ /N remains small, it effectively induces an… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The spin correlation ⟨Sa · Sb⟩ and the 3P correlator Cab|i as a function of doping at temperature β = 3 in (a) the σt-J model and (b) the t-J model. (c) The hole is at site i = (0, 0), and the two spins are at site a and b specified by the legend. Cab|i = C ⊥ ab|i + C z ab|i , where C ⊥ ab|i = ⟨B⊥ abhi⟩ ⟨hi⟩ − ⟨B ⊥ ab⟩, C z ab|i = ⟨Bz abhi⟩ ⟨hi⟩ − ⟨B z ab⟩. (20) Here hi = 1 − ni is the hole number operator, B⊥ ab = … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spin susceptibility χ obtained with a small probe field for (a) σt-J model (D = 12), (b) t-J model (D = 18) and (c) t-XX model (D = 12), all with t = 2, J = 1. The field is applied along the x direction for (a,c) and along the z direction for (b). The inset of each pan…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Specific heat Cv = ∂E/∂T for (a) σt-J model (D = 12), (b) t-J model (D = 18) and (c) t-XX model (D = 12), all with t = 2, J = 1. The energy E excludes the chemical potential terms. the Heisenberg model, with relatively weak spin rotation sym￾metry breaking. Therefore, …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Finite-temperature diagram of the central charge at RG step [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: CFT central charge c (red crosses) and scaling dimension spectrum ∆ (blue dots, including both NS and R sectors) for data points marked by red squares in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Spin correlation length ξ and (b) algebraic exponent η [defined in Eq. (23)] of the σt-J model at doping δ = 0.12, for which TBKT ≈ 0.33 estimated from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Zero-temperature mean-field dispersions of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Mean-field magnetic response of the σt-J model. (a) In-plane spin susceptibility χxx at δ = 1/12 (blue), in units of µ 2 B, compared with the Curie’s law behavior (1 − δ)/T of independent local moments (red), valid above T ∗ . The shaded region marks the crossover aro…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (a) Finite-temperature central charge diagram (after RG [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Transient RG flow of the square lattice Heisenberg model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Finite-temperature central charge diagram for the Heisen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [22]

    P. A. Lee, Amperean Pairing and the Pseudogap Phase of Cuprate Superconductors, Phys. Rev. X4, 031017 (2014)

    work page 2014

  2. [1]

    It may be ac- companied by a gauge transformationGg(i)≡e iϕg(i) ∈U(1) according to Eq

    Projective symmetry group analysis As introduced in Section IV A of the main text, owing to theU(1)gauge redundancy of the Schwinger-boson represen- tation, a symmetrygin the group ofphysicalsymmetriesSG acts on the bosonic spinons only projectively. It may be ac- companied by a gauge transformationGg(i)≡e iϕg(i) ∈U(1) according to Eq. (26). Distinct spin...

    work page

  3. [2]

    Semiclassical analysis The easy-plane order can also be understood semiclassi- cally, by evaluating on spin coherent states the two bond amplitudes that acquire mean values in Eq

    Further analysis of theZ 2(0,0)state a. Semiclassical analysis The easy-plane order can also be understood semiclassi- cally, by evaluating on spin coherent states the two bond amplitudes that acquire mean values in Eq. (33). The pair- ing∆ =⟨b i↑bj↓ −b i↓bj↑⟩and the spin-weighted hopping χ=⟨b † i↑bj↑ −b † i↓bj↓⟩, the latter being the combinationP σ σˆχij...

    work page

  4. [3]

    Substituting the labels of Eq

    Mean-field theory of theZ 2(0, π)state Finally, we briefly present the mean-field theory of the other allowed zero-flux state,Z 2(0, π). Substituting the labels of Eq. (28) into Eq. (27), the PSG differs from Eq. (30) only throughG d(x, y) =i. Applying the transformation rules Eqs. (B7) and (B8) to the representativex-bond amplitudes of Eq. (31), the hopp...

    work page

  5. [4]

    P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17 (2006)

    2006

  6. [5]

    Keimer, S

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, From quantum matter to high-temperature supercon- ductivity in copper oxides, Nature518, 179–186 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [6]

    Timusk and B

    T. Timusk and B. Statt, The pseudogap in high-temperature superconductors: an experimental survey, Rep. Prog. Phys.62, 61 (1999)

    work page 1999

  8. [7]

    W. W. Warren, Jr., R. E. Walstedt, G. F. Brennert, R. J. Cava, R. Tycko, R. F. Bell, and G. Dabbagh, Cu spin dynamics and superconducting precursor effects in planes aboveT c in YBa2Cu3O6.7, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 1193 (1989)

    work page 1989

Show all 78 references
  1. [8]

    Alloul, T

    H. Alloul, T. Ohno, and P. Mendels, 89Y NMR evidence for a Fermi-liquid behavior in YBa 2Cu3O6+x, Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 1700 (1989)

    1989

  2. [9]

    H. Ding, T. Yokoya, J. C. Campuzano, T. Takahashi, M. Ran- deria, M. R. Norman, T. Mochiku, K. Kadowaki, and J. Giap- intzakis, Spectroscopic evidence for a pseudogap in the normal state of underdoped high-T c superconductors, Nature382, 51 (1996)

    1996

  3. [10]

    A. G. Loeser, Z.-X. Shen, D. S. Dessau, D. S. Marshall, C. H. Park, P. Fournier, and A. Kapitulnik, Excitation gap in the nor- mal state of underdoped Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ, Science273, 325 (1996)

    1996

  4. [11]

    Fradkin, S

    E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, and J. M. Tranquada, Colloquium: Theory of intertwined orders in high temperature superconduc- tors, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 457 (2015)

    2015

  5. [12]

    Proust and L

    C. Proust and L. Taillefer, The remarkable underlying ground states of cuprate superconductors, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics10, 409 (2019)

    2019

  6. [13]

    D. F. Agterberg, J. S. Davis, S. D. Edkins, E. Fradkin, D. J. Van Harlingen, S. A. Kivelson, P. A. Lee, L. Radzihovsky, J. M. Tranquada, and Y. Wang, The physics of pair-density waves: cuprate superconductors and beyond, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics11, 231 (2020)

    2020

  7. [14]

    Zhang and Z.-Y

    J.-X. Zhang and Z.-Y. Weng, Crossover from Fermi arc to full Fermi surface, Phys. Rev. B108, 235156 (2023)

    2023

  8. [15]

    F. C. Zhang and T. M. Rice, Effective Hamiltonian for the su- perconducting Cu oxides, Phys. Rev. B37, 3759(R) (1988)

    1988

  9. [16]

    Corboz, S

    P. Corboz, S. R. White, G. Vidal, and M. Troyer, Stripes in the two-dimensionalt-Jmodel with infinite projected entangled- pair states, Phys. Rev. B84, 041108(R) (2011)

    2011

  10. [17]

    Corboz, T

    P. Corboz, T. M. Rice, and M. Troyer, Competing States in the t-JModel: Uniformd-Wave State versus Stripe State, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 046402 (2014)

    2014

  11. [18]

    Jiang, D

    S. Jiang, D. J. Scalapino, and S. R. White, Ground-state phase diagram of thet-t ′-Jmodel, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2109978118 (2021), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2109978118

    2021 doi

  12. [19]

    S. Gong, W. Zhu, and D. N. Sheng, Robustd-Wave Supercon- ductivity in the Square-Latticet−JModel, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 097003 (2021)

    2021

  13. [20]

    J.-W. Li, B. Bruognolo, A. Weichselbaum, and J. von Delft, Study of spin symmetry in the dopedt−Jmodel using infinite projected entangled pair states, Phys. Rev. B103, 075127 (2021)

    2021

  14. [21]

    Lu, J.-X

    X. Lu, J.-X. Zhang, S.-S. Gong, D. N. Sheng, and Z.-Y. Weng, Sign structure of thet−t ′ −Jmodel and its physical conse- quences, Phys. Rev. B110, 165127 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Schmitt-Rink, C

    S. Schmitt-Rink, C. M. Varma, and A. E. Ruckenstein, Spectral Function of Holes in a Quantum Antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 2793 (1988)

    1988

  16. [24]

    C. L. Kane, P. A. Lee, and N. Read, Motion of a single hole in a quantum antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B39, 6880 (1989)

    1989

  17. [25]

    Zheng, J.-X

    W. Zheng, J.-X. Zhang, Z.-Y. Yue, Z.-C. Gu, and Z.-Y. Weng, Revealing quantum phase string effect in a doped Mott insulator: A tensor network state study, Phys. Rev. B112, 214514 (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    Q. Li, Y. Gao, Y.-Y. He, Y. Qi, B.-B. Chen, and W. Li, Tangent Space Approach for Thermal Tensor Network Simulations of the 2D Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 226502 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Haegeman, J

    J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, I. Piˇ zorn, H. Verschelde, and F. Verstraete, Time-Dependent Variational Principle for Quantum Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 070601 (2011)

    2011

  20. [28]

    D.-W. Qu, Q. Li, S.-S. Gong, Y. Qi, W. Li, and G. Su, Phase Diagram,d-Wave Superconductivity, and Pseudogap of thet− t ′ −JModel at Finite Temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 256003 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Li, D.-W

    Q. Li, D.-W. Qu, B.-B. Chen, T. Shi, and W. Li, Thermal tensor network simulations of lattice fermions with fixed filling, Phys. Rev. B113, 085150 (2026)

    2026

  22. [30]

    Q. Li, Y. Qi, and W. Li, Fluctuating Pair Density Wave in Finite- temperature Phase Diagram of thet-t ′ Hubbard Model (2026), arXiv:2604.16293 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2026 arXiv

  23. [31]

    A. Ueda, S. De Meyer, A. Naravane, V. Vanthilt, and F. Ver- straete, Global Tensor Network Renormalization for 2D Quan- tum systems: A new window to probe universal data from ther- mal transitions (2025), arXiv:2508.05406 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Czarnik, L

    P. Czarnik, L. Cincio, and J. Dziarmaga, Projected entangled pair states at finite temperature: Imaginary time evolution with ancillas, Phys. Rev. B86, 245101 (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    Czarnik and J

    P. Czarnik and J. Dziarmaga, Fermionic projected entangled pair states at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. B90, 035144 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    Dziarmaga, Time evolution of an infinite projected entan- gled pair state: Neighborhood tensor update, Phys

    J. Dziarmaga, Time evolution of an infinite projected entan- gled pair state: Neighborhood tensor update, Phys. Rev. B104, 094411 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    Zhang, A

    Y. Zhang, A. Sinha, M. M. Rams, and J. Dziarmaga, Finite temperature dopant-induced spin reorganization explored via tensor networks in the two-dimensionalt−Jmodel, Phys. Rev. B113, 085113 (2026)

    2026

  28. [36]

    V. L. Berezinskii, Destruction of long-range order in one- dimensional and two-dimensional systems having a continuous symmetry group I. Classical systems, Sov. Phys. JETP32, 493 (1971)

    1971

  29. [37]

    V. L. Berezinskii, Destruction of long-range order in one- dimensional and two-dimensional systems possessing a con- tinuous symmetry group. II. Quantum systems, Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 610 (1972)

    1972

  30. [38]

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics6, 1181 (1973)

    1973

  31. [39]

    Jayaprakash, H

    C. Jayaprakash, H. R. Krishnamurthy, and S. Sarker, Mean-field theory for thet-Jmodel, Phys. Rev. B40, 2610 (1989). 20

    1989

  32. [40]

    Yoshioka, Slave-fermion mean field theory of the Hubbard model, J

    D. Yoshioka, Slave-fermion mean field theory of the Hubbard model, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.58, 1516 (1989)

    1989

  33. [41]

    D. P. Arovas and A. Auerbach, Functional integral theories of low-dimensional quantum Heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. B38, 316 (1988)

    1988

  34. [42]

    Read and S

    N. Read and S. Sachdev, Large-Nexpansion for frustrated quan- tum antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 1773 (1991)

    1991

  35. [43]

    Wen, Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids, Phys

    X.-G. Wen, Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B65, 165113 (2002)

    2002

  36. [44]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 016502 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    Wang and A

    F. Wang and A. Vishwanath, Spin-liquid states on the triangular and kagom´e lattices: A projective-symmetry-group analysis of Schwinger boson states, Phys. Rev. B74, 174423 (2006)

    2006

  38. [46]

    Yang and F

    X. Yang and F. Wang, Schwinger boson spin-liquid states on square lattice, Phys. Rev. B94, 035160 (2016)

    2016

  39. [47]

    Bultinck, D

    N. Bultinck, D. J. Williamson, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete, Fermionic matrix product states and one-dimensional topologi- cal phases, Phys. Rev. B95, 075108 (2017)

    2017

  40. [48]

    Mortier, L

    Q. Mortier, L. Devos, L. Burgelman, B. Vanhecke, N. Bultinck, F. Verstraete, J. Haegeman, and L. Vanderstraeten, Fermionic tensor network methods, SciPost Phys.18, 012 (2025)

    2025

  41. [49]

    Corboz, R

    P. Corboz, R. Or´ us, B. Bauer, and G. Vidal, Simulation of strongly correlated fermions in two spatial dimensions with fermionic projected entangled-pair states, Phys. Rev. B81, 165104 (2010)

    2010

  42. [50]

    Verstraete, J

    F. Verstraete, J. J. Garc´ıa-Ripoll, and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product density operators: Simulation of finite-temperature and dissipa- tive systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 207204 (2004)

    2004

  43. [51]

    A. D. King, A. Nocera, M. M. Rams, J. Dziarmaga, R. Wiersema, W. Bernoudy, J. Raymond, N. Kaushal, N. Heins- dorf, R. Harris, K. Boothby, F. Altomare, M. Asad, A. J. Berkley, M. Boschnak, K. Chern, H. Christiani, S. Cibere, J. Connor, M. H. Dehn, R. Deshpande, S. Ejtemaee, P. ...

    2025

  44. [52]

    H. C. Jiang, Z. Y. Weng, and T. Xiang, Accurate Determination of Tensor Network State of Quantum Lattice Models in Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 090603 (2008)

    2008

  45. [53]

    Yang, Z.-C

    S. Yang, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, Loop Optimization for Tensor Network Renormalization, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 110504 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    Gu and X.-G

    Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen, Tensor-entanglement-filtering renor- malization approach and symmetry-protected topological order, Phys. Rev. B80, 155131 (2009)

    2009

  47. [55]

    Bao, Loop Optimization of Tensor Network Renormalization: Algorithms and Applications (2019)

    C. Bao, Loop Optimization of Tensor Network Renormalization: Algorithms and Applications (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of Ferromagnetism or Antiferromagnetism in One- or Two-Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.17, 1133 (1966)

    1966

  49. [57]

    Brehmer, L

    P. Brehmer, L. Burgelman, Z.-Y. Yue, G. Fedorovich, J. Haege- man, and L. Devos, PEPSKit.jl: A Julia package for projected entangled-pair state simulations (2026), arXiv:2605.19960 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2026 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Vanthilt, A

    V. Vanthilt, A. Naravane, C. Meng, and A. Ueda, A practical introduction to tensor network renormalization with TNRKit.jl, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 77 (2026)

    2026

  51. [59]

    Vanthilt, A

    V. Vanthilt, A. Naravane, C. Meng, and A. Ueda, Codebase release 0.7 for TNRKit.jl, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 77 (2026)

    2026

  52. [60]

    Devos and J

    L. Devos and J. Haegeman, TensorKit.jl: A Julia package for large-scale tensor computations, with a hint of category theory (2025), arXiv:2508.10076 [cs.MS]

    2025 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. S ´en´echal,Conformal field theory(Springer Science & Business Media, 1997)

    1997

  54. [62]

    Ueda and M

    A. Ueda and M. Oshikawa, Tensor network renormalization study on the crossover in classical Heisenberg andRP2 models in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. E106, 014104 (2022)

    2022

  55. [63]

    Ding, Phase transition and thermodynamics of quantum XY model in two dimensions, Phys

    H.-Q. Ding, Phase transition and thermodynamics of quantum XY model in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B45, 230 (1992)

    1992

  56. [64]

    M. S. Makivi ´c and H.-Q. Ding, Two-dimensional spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet: A quantum Monte Carlo study, Phys. Rev. B43, 3562 (1991)

    1991

  57. [65]

    Auerbach and D

    A. Auerbach and D. P. Arovas, Spin dynamics in the square- lattice antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 617 (1988)

    1988

  58. [66]

    Sarker, C

    S. Sarker, C. Jayaprakash, H. R. Krishnamurthy, and M. Ma, Bosonic mean-field theory of quantum Heisenberg spin systems: Bose condensation and magnetic order, Phys. Rev. B40, 5028 (1989)

    1989

  59. [67]

    Chakravarty, B

    S. Chakravarty, B. I. Halperin, and D. R. Nelson, Two- dimensional quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet at low tem- peratures, Phys. Rev. B39, 2344 (1989)

    1989

  60. [68]

    K. Wu, Z. Y. Weng, and J. Zaanen, Sign structure of thet−J model, Phys. Rev. B77, 155102 (2008)

    2008

  61. [69]

    D. N. Sheng, Y. C. Chen, and Z. Y. Weng, Phase String Effect in a Doped Antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 5102 (1996)

    1996

  62. [70]

    Z. Y. Weng, D. N. Sheng, Y.-C. Chen, and C. S. Ting, Phase string effect in thet-Jmodel: General theory, Phys. Rev. B55, 3894 (1997)

    1997

  63. [71]

    Vanhecke, L

    B. Vanhecke, L. Vanderstraeten, and F. Verstraete, Symmet- ric cluster expansions with tensor networks, Phys. Rev. A103, L020402 (2021)

    2021

  64. [72]

    Vanhecke, D

    B. Vanhecke, D. Devoogdt, F. Verstraete, and L. Vanderstraeten, Simulating thermal density operators with cluster expansions and tensor networks, SciPost Phys.14, 085 (2023)

    2023

  65. [73]

    De Meyer, A

    S. De Meyer, A. Ueda, Y. He, N. Bultinck, and J. Haegeman, Lowering the temperature of two-dimensional fermionic ten- sor networks with cluster expansions (2026), arXiv:2602.22113 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2026

  66. [74]

    Miao, Z.-Y

    J.-J. Miao, Z.-Y. Yue, H. Zhang, W.-Q. Chen, and Z.-C. Gu, Spin-charge separation and unconventional superconductivity in thet-Jmodel on the honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B111, 174518 (2025)

    2025

  67. [75]

    Zheng, Z.-Y

    W. Zheng, Z.-Y. Yue, J.-H. Zhang, and Z.-C. Gu, Competing pair density wave orders in the square latticet-Jmodel, Commun. Phys.8, 456 (2025)

    2025

  68. [76]

    Yue, Z.-T

    Z.-Y. Yue, Z.-T. Xu, S. Yang, and Z.-C. Gu, Pseudogap phase as fluctuating pair density wave (2024), arXiv:2404.16770 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Harada and N

    K. Harada and N. Kawashima, Universal jump in the helicity modulus of the two-dimensional quantum XY model, Phys. Rev. B55, R11949(R) (1997)

    1997

  70. [78]

    Biagini, A

    C. Biagini, A. Cuccoli, V. Tognetti, R. Vaia, and P. Verrucchi, Quantum correction to the BKT transition for 2D easy-plane antiferromagnets, Journal of Applied Physics79, 4638 (1996)

    1996

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.