Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 50 references

Eigenforms and special holonomy

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read On any gravitational instanton, nonzero-eigenvalue L2 eigenforms exist exactly when L2 eigenfunctions do, and on ALE and A_n ALF spaces they do not.

desk verdict The paper's central spectral rigidity results are credible and likely correct, but Lemma 5.2 contains a real gap that needs a standard repair before the proof of Theorem 1.8(b) is sound. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09878 v1 pith:EM7ZA6G4 submitted 2026-08-10 math.DG hep-th

Bobby Acharya , Lucía Cabrera , Simone Corbo , Jason D. Lotay This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGhep-th MSC 58J5053C2653C2953C25
keywords L2eigenformsHodgeLaplaciangravitationalinstantonsspecialholonomyhyperkählermanifoldsasymptoticallyconicalmulti-Taub-NUTmagneticSchrödingeroperators
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that on any gravitational instanton—a complete non-compact Ricci-flat 4-manifold with hyperkähler holonomy—the nonzero-eigenvalue spectrum of the Hodge Laplacian on forms is rigidly tied to the spectrum on functions: a nonzero-eigenvalue L2 eigenform exists in any degree exactly when a nonzero-eigenvalue L2 eigenfunction exists. Because asymptotically conical manifolds admit no L2 eigenfunctions, all ALE gravitational instantons therefore have no nonzero-eigenvalue L2 eigenforms at all. The same vanishing is proved for A_n ALF (multi-Taub–NUT) instantons, where the scalar eigenvalue problem is reduced by a circle-action Fourier decomposition to a family of magnetic Schrödinger operators. Partial analogues of the rigidity are proved for Calabi–Yau 3-folds, G2 manifolds, and Spin(7) manifolds. Physically, the vanishing theorems say that string and M-theory compactifications on ALE and A_n ALF spaces produce no massive Kaluza–Klein states from L2 forms.

What carries the argument

The mechanism carrying Theorem 1.8 is the hyperkähler structure: on a gravitational instanton the self-dual 2-form bundle is trivialised by three parallel Kähler forms $\omega_1,\omega_2,\omega_3$, so every self-dual 2-form is $\sum f_i\omega_i$ and the Hodge Laplacian acts componentwise, giving $E^2_+(\lambda) \cong E^0(\lambda)^3$. The 1-form and anti-self-dual cases are killed by Lemma 5.2, which uses Stokes theorem with the boundary term at infinity vanishing because $|\alpha\wedge d\alpha|=O(r^{-4+m})$ on an $AT^mC$ end; this forces $\|d\alpha\|_{L^2}^2=0$. For $A_n$ ALF instantons, the key machinery is the Gibbons–Hawking circle action: Fourier decomposition in the fibre direction reduces the scalar Laplacian eigenvalue equation to a family of magnetic Schrödinger operators $P_s^*P_s + W_{s,\lambda}$ on $\mathbb{R}^3\setminus\{x_1,\dots,x_n\}$, and the positive-energy modes are ruled out by an extension of the magnetic virial vanishing argument, adapted to a nontrivial line bundle over the sphere at infinity.

What would settle it

Exhibit a gravitational instanton and a nonzero $\lambda$ with an $L^2$ eigenform of the Hodge Laplacian in some degree but no $L^2$ eigenfunction; this would falsify Theorem 1.8(b). More locally, find an $L^2$ 1-form $\alpha$ with $d\alpha\in L^2$ on a gravitational instanton such that the flux of $\alpha\wedge d\alpha$ through large spheres does not tend to zero, which would falsify Lemma 5.2 and the vanishing of $E^1(\lambda)$ when $E^0(\lambda)=0$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that for $\lambda \neq 0$ the spaces $E^k(\lambda)$ of $L^2$ eigenforms of the Hodge Laplacian on a gravitational instanton are all simultaneously trivial or all simultaneously nontrivial, and both alternatives are controlled by functions. The argument uses the hyperkähler structure: the self-dual 2-form bundle on a gravitational instanton is flat and trivial, spanned by three parallel Kähler forms $\omega_1,\omega_2,\omega_3$, so the self-dual eigenform equation decomposes componentwise into three copies of the eigenfunction equation. The remaining form degrees are killed by a Stokes-boundary lemma: if $\alpha,d\alpha \in L^2$, the boundary term at infinity vanishes and forces $d\alpha = 0$ whenever $d\alpha$ is purely self-dual or anti-self-dual. As a consequence, once $E^0(\lambda)=0$, every $L^2$ eigenform with eigenvalue $\lambda$ vanishes in every degree. Combining this rigidity with known non-existence of $L^2$ eigenfunctions on asymptotically conical manifolds yields vanishing of all nonzero-eigenvalue $L^2$ eigenforms on ALE instantons; for $A_n$ ALF instantons the same conclusion is reached by proving $E^0(\lambda)=0$ via the circle action and a magnetic Schrödinger vanishing theorem.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that on a gravitational instanton, the boundary term at infinity in the Stokes identity for $\int d(\alpha\wedge d\alpha)$ vanishes whenever $\alpha,d\alpha\in L^2$; the stated pointwise decay does not follow from $L^2$-integrability alone, so if the flux through large spheres fails to tend to zero, the proof of Theorem 1.8(b) breaks down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On every ALE gravitational instanton, the only $L^2$ eigenforms of the Hodge Laplacian are harmonic forms: there are no nonzero-eigenvalue $L^2$ eigenforms in any degree.
  • On every $A_n$ ALF/multi-Taub–NUT gravitational instanton, the same vanishing holds: $E^k(\lambda)=0$ for all $\lambda\neq 0$ and all $k$.
  • On the Atiyah–Hitchin manifold and its double cover, there are infinitely many nonzero eigenvalues $\lambda$ for which $L^2$ eigenforms exist in every degree $k=0,1,2,3,4$.
  • On any Kähler, $G_2$, or $Spin(7)$ manifold, a nonzero-eigenvalue $L^2$ eigenfunction forces the existence of nonzero-eigenvalue $L^2$ eigenforms in many form degrees, by wedging with parallel forms.
  • The vanishing results rule out massive Kaluza–Klein states in string and M-theory compactifications on ALE and $A_n$ ALF gravitational instantons, leaving only zero-mode physics coupled to the ADE gauge sector.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Theorem 1.8(b) holds for all gravitational instantons as stated, the hyperkähler rigidity should extend unchanged to ALG, ALH, ALG* and ALH* types; what is missing there is only the input $E^0(\lambda)=0$, which the paper's Fourier method does not currently reach.
  • The stark contrast between $A_n$ ALF spaces (no massive eigenforms) and Atiyah–Hitchin (infinitely many) suggests the sign of the Gibbons–Hawking mass at infinity is the controlling feature; this could be tested by studying $D_n$ ALF instantons with negative-mass asymptotics.
  • In the physical picture, the vanishing results imply that only the zero-mode sector—ADE harmonic 2-forms together with brane states—contributes to the low-energy effective theory on ALE spaces; if any non-AC special-holonomy manifold admitted massive $L^2$ eigenforms, those would be genuine massive Kaluza–Klein particles rather than geometric artifacts.
  • The AC vanishing result (Proposition 1.17) is independent of holonomy, so the paper suggests that asymptotic conicality, not special holonomy per se, is what suppresses massive $L^2$ eigenforms; a direct test would be to look for nonzero-eigenvalue $L^2$ eigenforms on asymptotically cylindrical special-holonomy manifolds, where the paper predicts they should exist.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies L² eigenforms of the Hodge Laplacian on complete non-compact Ricci-flat manifolds with special holonomy, with the main focus on 4-dimensional gravitational instantons. It defines the eigenspaces E^k(λ) and proves Theorem 1.8: for λ ≠ 0 on any gravitational instanton, the absence of L² eigenfunctions implies the absence of L² eigenforms in every degree, while the presence of an eigenfunction produces eigenforms in all degrees. Combining this with known non-existence of eigenfunctions on ALE spaces (via Donnelly's exhaustion theorem) and with a new non-existence theorem on A_n ALF/multi-Taub–NUT spaces (via dimensional reduction and magnetic Schrödinger vanishing), the paper derives Corollaries 1.13 and 1.15: no nonzero-eigenvalue L² eigenforms on these families, while Atiyah–Hitchin and its double cover have infinitely many such eigenforms. The paper also proves partial analogues for Calabi–Yau 3-folds, G₂ manifolds and Spin(7) manifolds using holonomy decompositions, and it gives a physical discussion of massive Kaluza–Klein modes in string and M-theory.

Significance. If the main theorems hold, this is a clean and useful structural result: on gravitational instantons it reduces a form-spectrum question to the scalar Laplacian, and it gives the first rigorous non-existence statements for nonzero-eigenvalue L² eigenforms on ALE and A_n ALF spaces. The proof strategy is attractive: it uses the hyperkähler parallel self-dual 2-forms, the stability of the self-dual/anti-self-dual splitting, and exactness to force dα = d*α = 0 for an eigen-1-form once no eigenfunctions exist. The paper also gives genuinely useful partial extensions in higher special-holonomy settings and correctly identifies where the argument uses curvature decay. The reliance on external results (Donnelly [21], scattering calculus [17], and magnetic Schrödinger theory [6]) is appropriate; no quantity is fitted and the argument is a priori rather than circular. However, one boundary-integration step in the proof of the central theorem is not justified as written, and the ALG*/ALH* and line-bundle extensions are asserted rather than proved in full detail.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.2, Lemma 5.2, Eq. (5.5)] The assertion that |α∧dα| = O(r^{-4+m}) follows from α,dα ∈ L² is not valid. L² integrability gives only average decay over spheres, not pointwise decay, and for general L² forms the pointwise estimate is false. This step is load-bearing: Proposition 5.3 uses Lemma 5.2 to conclude dα = 0 for an eigen-1-form once E⁰(λ) = 0, and Theorem 1.8(b) and Corollary 1.15(a) depend on it. The standard repair is to avoid pointwise decay: use Cauchy–Schwarz and the coarea formula to choose radii r_j → ∞ with ∫_{Σ_{r_j}} |α∧dα| dσ → 0, so that the boundary term in (5.4) vanishes along a subsequence. The same repair is needed in Lemma 7.1, whose proof copies this argument. Please supply this sequence argument and state explicitly that the boundary term vanishes along a sequence of cutoffs rather than by pointwise decay.
  2. [§3.2 and §5.2, ALG*/ALH* cases] Lemma 3.3 and the final paragraph of Lemma 5.2 dismiss the ALG* and ALH* cases with 'the argument is essentially the same' and 'we omit the details.' These cases are included in the statement of Theorem 1.8, so the proof is incomplete for a class of gravitational instantons in the theorem. In particular, one needs a radius function, the volume growth of the model spheres at infinity, and the analogue of (5.5)–(5.6) for these geometries; the paper does not provide them. Please either add these estimates or restrict Theorem 1.8 to the four AT^mC classes and state the ALG*/ALH* case as an open extension.
  3. [§6.7, Theorem 6.13, Steps 4–5] The proof of Theorem 6.13 is an extension of [6] from Euclidean R³ to a Hermitian line bundle over an exterior domain with possibly nontrivial topology at infinity. The manuscript correctly identifies the needed replacement of the magnetic term by s ι_X dη, but the key step 'the proof of [6, Proposition 4.1] goes through' is asserted rather than demonstrated. It must be checked that the hypotheses of [6, Prop. 4.1] hold for H_s on D_{R_0}, including the treatment of the inner boundary and the nontrivial holonomy of L_s at infinity. The estimates (6.33), (6.36) and (6.37) are the right ingredients, but the derivation of (6.53)–(6.54) from them is not written out. Since Theorem 6.13 is the technical heart of Theorem 1.14, and hence of Corollary 1.15(a), this point needs to be closed before the result can be considered fully proved.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§1.1, Remark 1.7] The word 'gravitional' should be 'gravitational'.
  2. [§3.2, Eqs. (3.12) and (3.15)] In the displayed equations, the terms written as '2∫_M f_k ∧ α ∧ ∗dα' are missing the factor df_k; they should read '2∫_M f_k df_k ∧ α ∧ ∗dα'. The same typo appears in the estimate after (3.14).
  3. [§6.5, Remark 6.5] 'dual cover' should be 'double cover' in both occurrences.
  4. [§6.4] The notation 'E^0_λ(s)' is used where the paper elsewhere writes 'E^0_s(λ)'; please make the notation uniform.
  5. [§6.7, Step 5] In '⟨v_k, i[H_s,D]]v_k⟩' there is a stray closing bracket; it should be '⟨v_k, i[H_s,D]v_k⟩'.
  6. [§7.3, Lemma 7.7] 'analogus' should be 'analogous'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the analytic results are proved from external tools with no fitted parameters and no load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation, Theorem 1.8(b), is assembled from Lemma 3.3, Lemma 5.1, Proposition 5.3 and Lemma 5.4. None of these steps assumes the conclusion E^k(lambda)=0 in order to prove it. Lemma 5.1 relates E^2_+(lambda) to E^0(lambda) by writing a self-dual 2-form as alpha = f_1 omega_1 + f_2 omega_2 + f_3 omega_3 and computing Delta alpha = sum (Delta f_j) omega_j; this is a direct calculation from the hyperkaehler structure, not a definitional equivalence. Proposition 5.3 shows that if E^0(lambda)=0, then d*alpha=0, d+alpha=0 by Lemma 5.1, and dalpha=0 by Lemma 5.2, forcing alpha=0 because lambda is nonzero. Lemma 5.4 then reduces E^2_-(lambda) to E^1(lambda), and the Hodge star gives the remaining degrees. The proof relies on external results: Donnelly's exhaustion-function theorem [21, Cor. 5.3] for Proposition 4.5, the scattering-calculus result [17, Cor. 5.5] for Proposition 4.6, and the magnetic Schroedinger vanishing theorem [6, Thm. 4.8] adapted in Theorem 6.13 for Theorem 1.14. These are independent analytic inputs, not restatements of the paper's conclusions. The self-citations [1,2,3] appear only in the physical interpretation in Section 8 and in motivational remarks; they do not support the vanishing theorems. The one substantive concern in the text is the boundary-term assertion in Lemma 5.2, Eq. (5.5), where |alpha wedge dalpha| = O(r^{-4+m}) is claimed from alpha, dalpha in L^2 alone; this is a possible correctness gap in the proof of Proposition 5.3, not a circularity, because it does not presuppose the target result and involves no fitted parameter or self-citation. Overall circularity score is therefore 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The theorems depend on external analytic results (Donnelly, scattering calculus, magnetic Schroedinger, the classification of gravitational instantons) and on two sketched adaptations (ALG*/ALH* asymptotics, and the line-bundle extension of [6]). There are no fitted parameters or invented physical entities.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Classification of gravitational instantons into ALE, ALF, ALG, ALH, ALG*, ALH* with specified asymptotic geometry, from Sun-Zhang [48].
    Invoked in Remark 1.7, Lemma 3.3, and Lemma 5.2 to cover all possible asymptotic types.
  • standard math Donnelly's exhaustion-function criterion [21, Cor 5.3] that a suitable exhaustion function forces absence of L^2 eigenfunctions.
    Used in Proposition 4.5 to prove E^0(lambda) = 0 on AC manifolds.
  • standard math Scattering calculus eigenvalue theorem [17, Cor 5.5] that solutions to H alpha = lambda alpha vanish outside a compact set for scattering metrics with decaying perturbation, plus [42, p. 78].
    Used in Proposition 4.6 and Remark 4.7 to obtain vanishing of all eigenforms on AC manifolds.
  • ad hoc to paper The magnetic Schroedinger absence-of-eigenvalues technology of Avramska-Lukarska, Hundertmark and Kovarik [6, Prop 4.1, Thm 4.8] extends to Hermitian line bundles over exterior domains with possibly nontrivial topology.
    Theorem 6.13 depends on this extension; Step 1 (radial gauge) and Step 5 assert the extension goes through, but the details are sketched rather than proven.
  • standard math Unique continuation for second order elliptic operators on complete manifolds.
    Used at the end of Proposition 4.6 and Theorem 1.14 to pass from vanishing outside a compact set to vanishing everywhere.
  • ad hoc to paper ALG* and ALH* model geometries admit the same cutoff and boundary estimates as in Lemmas 3.2 and 5.2.
    The paper states in Lemma 3.3 that 'one can adapt the construction' and in Lemma 5.2 that the argument is 'essentially the same'; details are omitted.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Eigenforms and special holonomy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EM7ZA6G4

@misc{pith2026260809878,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Eigenforms and special holonomy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EM7ZA6G4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09878}
}
abstract

We prove existence and non-existence results for $L^2$ eigenforms for the Hodge Laplacian on complete non-compact Ricci flat manifolds with special holonomy, with a particular focus on gravitational instantons. We briefly describe the physical interpretation of these results in superstring and M-theory.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [6]

    Ab- sence of positive eigenvalues of magnetic Schr¨ odinger operators.Calc

    Silvana Avramska-Lukarska, Dirk Hundertmark, and Hynek Kovaˇ r´ ık. Ab- sence of positive eigenvalues of magnetic Schr¨ odinger operators.Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 62(2):Paper No. 63, 66, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [21]

    Exhaustion functions and the spectrum of Riemannian manifolds.Indiana Univ

    Harold Donnelly. Exhaustion functions and the spectrum of Riemannian manifolds.Indiana Univ. Math. J., 46(2):505–527, 1997

    work page 1997

  3. [17]

    Chru´ sciel, Luc Nguyen, Paul Tod, and Andr´ as Vasy

    Piotr T. Chru´ sciel, Luc Nguyen, Paul Tod, and Andr´ as Vasy. Asymp- totically flat Einstein-Maxwell fields are inheriting.Comm. Anal. Geom., 29(3):579–627, 2021

    work page 2021

  4. [1]

    M theory, Joyce orbifolds and super Yang-Mills

    Bobby Samir Acharya. M theory, Joyce orbifolds and super Yang-Mills. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 3(2):227–248, 1999. 34

    work page 1999

  5. [2]

    Confinement in Five Dimensions

    Bobby Samir Acharya. Confinement in Five Dimensions. arXiv:2407.03171, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  6. [3]

    M theory and singularities of exceptional holonomy manifolds.Phys

    Bobby Samir Acharya and Sergei Gukov. M theory and singularities of exceptional holonomy manifolds.Phys. Rept., 392:121–189, 2004

    work page 2004

  7. [4]

    Michael Atiyah and Nigel Hitchin.The geometry and dynamics of magnetic monopoles. M. B. Porter Lectures. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1988

    work page 1988

  8. [5]

    M-theory dynamics on a manifold of G2 holonomy.Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 6:1–106, 2003

    Michael Atiyah and Edward Witten. M-theory dynamics on a manifold of G2 holonomy.Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 6:1–106, 2003

    work page 2003

Show all 50 references
  1. [7]

    Heckman, Craig Lawrie, Ethan Torres, and Gianluca Zoccarato

    Rodrigo Barbosa, Mirjam Cvetiˇ c, Jonathan J. Heckman, Craig Lawrie, Ethan Torres, and Gianluca Zoccarato. T-branes andG 2 backgrounds. Phys. Rev. D, 101(2):026015, 23, 2020

    2020

  2. [8]

    Schroers, and Kim Smedley-Williams

    Lyonell Boulton, Bernd J. Schroers, and Kim Smedley-Williams. Quantum bound states in Yang-Mills-Higgs theory.Comm. Math. Phys., 363(1):261– 287, 2018

    2018

  3. [9]

    Bryant and Simon M

    Robert L. Bryant and Simon M. Salamon. On the construction of some complete metrics with exceptional holonomy.Duke Math. J., 58(3):829– 850, 1989

    1989

  4. [10]

    de la Ossa

    Philip Candelas and Xenia C. de la Ossa. Comments on conifolds.Nuclear Phys. B, 342(1):246–268, 1990

    1990

  5. [11]

    Complete non-compact Spin(7)-manifolds fromT 2- bundles over AC Calabi Yau manifolds

    Nicol´ o Cavalleri. Complete non-compact Spin(7)-manifolds fromT 2- bundles over AC Calabi Yau manifolds. arXiv:2407.19486, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Spectral geometry of singular Riemannian spaces.J

    Jeff Cheeger. Spectral geometry of singular Riemannian spaces.J. Differ- ential Geom., 18(4):575–657 (1984), 1983

    1984

  7. [13]

    Gravitational instantons with faster than quadratic curvature decay (II).J

    Gao Chen and Xiuxiong Chen. Gravitational instantons with faster than quadratic curvature decay (II).J. Reine Angew. Math., 756:259–284, 2019

    2019

  8. [14]

    Gravitational instantons with faster than quadratic curvature decay

    Gao Chen and Xiuxiong Chen. Gravitational instantons with faster than quadratic curvature decay. I.Acta Math., 227(2):263–307, 2021

    2021

  9. [15]

    Gravitational instantons with faster than quadratic curvature decay (III).Math

    Gao Chen and Xiuxiong Chen. Gravitational instantons with faster than quadratic curvature decay (III).Math. Ann., 380(1-2):687–717, 2021

    2021

  10. [16]

    Invariant Ricci-flat metrics of cohomogeneity one with Wallach spaces as principal orbits.Ann

    Hanci Chi. Invariant Ricci-flat metrics of cohomogeneity one with Wallach spaces as principal orbits.Ann. Global Anal. Geom., 56(2):361–401, 2019. 35

    2019

  11. [18]

    Conlon and Hans-Joachim Hein

    Ronan J. Conlon and Hans-Joachim Hein. Classification of asymptotically conical Calabi-Yau manifolds.Duke Math. J., 173(5):947–1015, 2024

    2024

  12. [19]

    Conlon and Fr´ ed´ eric Rochon

    Ronan J. Conlon and Fr´ ed´ eric Rochon. New examples of complete Calabi- Yau metrics onC n forn≥3.Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´ er. (4), 54(2):259– 303, 2021

    2021

  13. [20]

    Schroers

    Erik Jan de Vries and Bernd J. Schroers. Supersymmetric quantum me- chanics of magnetic monopoles: a case study.Nuclear Phys. B, 815(3):368– 403, 2009

    2009

  14. [22]

    ALF gravitational instantons and collapsing Ricci-flat metrics on theK3 surface.J

    Lorenzo Foscolo. ALF gravitational instantons and collapsing Ricci-flat metrics on theK3 surface.J. Differential Geom., 112(1):79–120, 2019

    2019

  15. [23]

    Complete noncompact Spin(7) manifolds from self-dual Einstein 4-orbifolds.Geom

    Lorenzo Foscolo. Complete noncompact Spin(7) manifolds from self-dual Einstein 4-orbifolds.Geom. Topol., 25(1):339–408, 2021

    2021

  16. [24]

    Complete noncompact G2-manifolds from asymptotically conical Calabi-Yau 3-folds

    Lorenzo Foscolo, Mark Haskins, and Johannes Nordstr¨ om. Complete noncompact G2-manifolds from asymptotically conical Calabi-Yau 3-folds. Duke Math. J., 170(15):3323–3416, 2021

    2021

  17. [25]

    Infinitely many new families of complete cohomogeneity one G 2-manifolds: G 2 analogues of the Taub-NUT and Eguchi-Hanson spaces.J

    Lorenzo Foscolo, Mark Haskins, and Johannes Nordstr¨ om. Infinitely many new families of complete cohomogeneity one G 2-manifolds: G 2 analogues of the Taub-NUT and Eguchi-Hanson spaces.J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 23(7):2153–2220, 2021

    2021

  18. [26]

    Gibbons and Stephen W

    Gary W. Gibbons and Stephen W. Hawking. Gravitational multi- instantons.Physics Letters B, 78(4):430–432, 1978

    1978

  19. [27]

    Gibbons and Nicholas S

    Gary W. Gibbons and Nicholas S. Manton. Classical and quantum dynam- ics of BPS monopoles.Nuclear Phys. B, 274(1):183–224, 1986

    1986

  20. [28]

    Asymptoti- cally cylindrical Calabi-Yau manifolds.J

    Mark Haskins, Hans-Joachim Hein, and Johannes Nordstr¨ om. Asymptoti- cally cylindrical Calabi-Yau manifolds.J. Differential Geom., 101(2):213– 265, 2015

    2015

  21. [29]

    Hodge cohomology of gravitational instantons.Duke Math

    Tam´ as Hausel, Eugenie Hunsicker, and Rafe Mazzeo. Hodge cohomology of gravitational instantons.Duke Math. J., 122(3):485–548, 2004

    2004

  22. [30]

    Hull and Paul K

    Chris M. Hull and Paul K. Townsend. Unity of superstring dualities.Nucl. Phys. B, 438:109–137, 1995. 36

    1995

  23. [31]

    Morrison, and Nathan Seiberg

    Kenneth Intriligator, David R. Morrison, and Nathan Seiberg. Five- dimensional supersymmetric gauge theories and degenerations of Calabi– Yau spaces.Nuclear Physics B, 497:56–100, 1997

    1997

  24. [32]

    Schroers

    Rogelio Jante and Bernd J. Schroers. Taub-NUT dynamics with a magnetic field.J. Geom. Phys., 104:305–328, 2016

    2016

  25. [33]

    Spiro Karigiannis and Jason D. Lotay. Deformation theory of G 2 conifolds. Comm. Anal. Geom., 28(5):1057–1210, 2020

    2020

  26. [34]

    Noncompact Riemannian manifolds with purely continuous spectrum.Michigan Math

    Leon Karp. Noncompact Riemannian manifolds with purely continuous spectrum.Michigan Math. J., 31(3):339–347, 1984

    1984

  27. [35]

    Geometric engineering of quantum field theories.Nuclear Physics B, 497:173–195, 1997

    Sheldon Katz, Albrecht Klemm, and Cumrun Vafa. Geometric engineering of quantum field theories.Nuclear Physics B, 497:173–195, 1997

    1997

  28. [36]

    Asymptotically cylindrical manifolds with holonomy Spin(7)

    Alexei Kovalev. Asymptotically cylindrical manifolds with holonomy Spin(7). I. arXiv:1309.5027, 2013

    2013 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Asymptotically cylindrical 7- manifolds of holonomyG 2 with applications to compact irreducibleG 2- manifolds.Ann

    Alexei Kovalev and Johannes Nordstr¨ om. Asymptotically cylindrical 7- manifolds of holonomyG 2 with applications to compact irreducibleG 2- manifolds.Ann. Global Anal. Geom., 38(3):221–257, 2010

    2010

  30. [38]

    Kronheimer

    Peter B. Kronheimer. The construction of ALE spaces as hyper-K¨ ahler quotients.J. Differential Geom., 29(3):665–683, 1989

    1989

  31. [39]

    Geometric transitions with Spin(7) holonomy via a dy- namical system.Comm

    Fabian Lehmann. Geometric transitions with Spin(7) holonomy via a dy- namical system.Comm. Math. Phys., 394(1):309–353, 2022

    2022

  32. [40]

    Deformations of asymptotically conical Spin(7)- manifolds.Comm

    Fabian Lehmann. Deformations of asymptotically conical Spin(7)- manifolds.Comm. Anal. Geom., 32(2):605–666, 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    A new complete Calabi-Yau metric onC 3.Invent

    Yang Li. A new complete Calabi-Yau metric onC 3.Invent. Math., 217(1):1–34, 2019

    2019

  34. [42]

    Melrose.Geometric scattering theory

    Richard B. Melrose.Geometric scattering theory. Stanford Lectures. Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995

    1995

  35. [43]

    On the asymptotic geometry of gravitational instantons

    Vincent Minerbe. On the asymptotic geometry of gravitational instantons. Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´ er. (4), 43(6):883–924, 2010

    2010

  36. [44]

    Rigidity for multi-Taub-NUT metrics.J

    Vincent Minerbe. Rigidity for multi-Taub-NUT metrics.J. Reine Angew. Math., 656:47–58, 2011

    2011

  37. [45]

    Ricci-flat deformations of metrics with exceptional holonomy.Bull

    Johannes Nordstr¨ om. Ricci-flat deformations of metrics with exceptional holonomy.Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 45(5):1004–1018, 2013

    2013

  38. [46]

    Schroers and Michael A

    Benrd J. Schroers and Michael A. Singer.D k gravitational instantons as superpositions of Atiyah-Hitchin and Taub-NUT geometries.Q. J. Math., 72(1-2):277–337, 2021. 37

    2021

  39. [47]

    Matthew B. Stenzel. Ricci-flat metrics on the complexification of a compact rank one symmetric space.Manuscripta Math., 80(2):151–163, 1993

    1993

  40. [48]

    Collapsing geometry of hyperk¨ ahler 4- manifolds and applications.Acta Math., 232(2):325–424, 2024

    Song Sun and Ruobing Zhang. Collapsing geometry of hyperk¨ ahler 4- manifolds and applications.Acta Math., 232(2):325–424, 2024

    2024

  41. [49]

    Degenerations ofCn and Calabi-Yau metrics.Duke Math

    G´ abor Sz´ ekelyhidi. Degenerations ofCn and Calabi-Yau metrics.Duke Math. J., 168(14):2651–2700, 2019

    2019

  42. [50]

    McKenzie Y. Wang. Preserving parallel spinors under metric deformations. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 40(3):815–844, 1991. Bobby S. Acharya The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Strada Costiera 11, I-34151 Trieste, Italy bacharya@ictp.it Luc´ıa M. Cab...

    1991

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.